Testing

Testing
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:ChatGPT(OpenAI),最先进的大型语言模型,在各种专业应用中表现出卓越的性能。尽管人工智能越来越受欢迎和有效,很少有研究使用Rasch分析的KIDMAP来评估ChatGPT解决多项选择题(MCQ)的能力,这是一种用于评估ChatGPT在MCQ回答中的表现的网站工具。
    目的:本研究旨在(1)展示网站的实用性(Rasch分析,特别是RaschOnline),和(2)确定ChatGPT与正常样品相比所达到的等级。
    方法:使用2023年台湾高考英语考试的10个项目评估了ChatGPT的能力。在Rasch模型下,对300名正态分布的模拟学生进行了模拟,以与ChatGPT的回答进行竞争。RaschOnline用于生成5个视觉演示,包括项目困难,差分项目功能,项目特性曲线,赖特地图,还有KIDMAP,为了实现研究目标。
    结果:研究结果表明:(1)10个项目的难度以单调的方式从更容易到更难增加,用logits(-2.43,-1.78,-1.48,-0.64,-0.1,0.33,0.59,1.34,1.7和2.47)表示;(2)在第5项的性别组之间观察到不同项目功能的证据(P=.04);(3)第5项显示出与Rasch模型的良好拟合(P=.61);(4)由Infit均方误差低于阈值1.5表示;(5)性别组之间获得的测量结果没有显着差异(P=.83);(6)能力等级之间存在显着差异(P<.001);(7)ChatGPT的能力等级为A,超越等级B到E。
    结论:通过使用RaschOnline,这项研究提供的证据表明,与正常样本相比,ChatGPT具有达到A级的能力。它在回答2023年台湾高考英语考试的MCQ方面表现出出色的能力。
    BACKGROUND: ChatGPT (OpenAI), a state-of-the-art large language model, has exhibited remarkable performance in various specialized applications. Despite the growing popularity and efficacy of artificial intelligence, there is a scarcity of studies that assess ChatGPT\'s competence in addressing multiple-choice questions (MCQs) using KIDMAP of Rasch analysis-a website tool used to evaluate ChatGPT\'s performance in MCQ answering.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to (1) showcase the utility of the website (Rasch analysis, specifically RaschOnline), and (2) determine the grade achieved by ChatGPT when compared to a normal sample.
    METHODS: The capability of ChatGPT was evaluated using 10 items from the English tests conducted for Taiwan college entrance examinations in 2023. Under a Rasch model, 300 simulated students with normal distributions were simulated to compete with ChatGPT\'s responses. RaschOnline was used to generate 5 visual presentations, including item difficulties, differential item functioning, item characteristic curve, Wright map, and KIDMAP, to address the research objectives.
    RESULTS: The findings revealed the following: (1) the difficulty of the 10 items increased in a monotonous pattern from easier to harder, represented by logits (-2.43, -1.78, -1.48, -0.64, -0.1, 0.33, 0.59, 1.34, 1.7, and 2.47); (2) evidence of differential item functioning was observed between gender groups for item 5 (P=.04); (3) item 5 displayed a good fit to the Rasch model (P=.61); (4) all items demonstrated a satisfactory fit to the Rasch model, indicated by Infit mean square errors below the threshold of 1.5; (5) no significant difference was found in the measures obtained between gender groups (P=.83); (6) a significant difference was observed among ability grades (P<.001); and (7) ChatGPT\'s capability was graded as A, surpassing grades B to E.
    CONCLUSIONS: By using RaschOnline, this study provides evidence that ChatGPT possesses the ability to achieve a grade A when compared to a normal sample. It exhibits excellent proficiency in answering MCQs from the English tests conducted in 2023 for the Taiwan college entrance examinations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于引起无症状感染的病原体,评估疫苗对无症状感染的疗效(VE)对于了解疫苗的潜在流行病学影响很重要。定期检测亚临床感染是一种潜在的有价值的策略,但其成功取决于参与者的依从性和最大限度地减少假阳性。本文介绍了COVID-19疫苗试验中每周检测的实施和依从性。
    方法:COV002是评估ChAdOx1nCoV-19疫苗对抗SARS-CoV-2的2/3期试验。使用每周自我施用的拭子进行RT-PCR测试来检测无症状感染。我们使用混合效应回归模型分析了依从性,并使用依从性和测试特征的估计值估计了真阳性和假阳性无症状感染的概率。
    结果:在13个月的随访中,有10,811名参与者自行进行了356,551项测试。依从性中位数为75.0%(IQR42·6-90·9),这意味着在拭子期间检测到阳性无症状感染的概率为74·5%(IQR50·9-78·8),在VE评估过程中,有21到96个假阳性。每周返回拭子的几率下降了8%,并且在测试阳性和脱盲后进一步下降。老年群体的依从性较高,女性和非医疗工作者。
    结论:COV002试验证明了运行长期定期无症状测试策略的可行性。这些信息对于设计以感染为结果的未来III期疫苗试验可能是有价值的。
    背景:英国研究与创新,美国国立卫生研究院(NIHR),防疫创新联盟,NIHR牛津生物医学研究中心,泰晤士河谷和南米德兰的NIHR临床研究网络,阿斯利康。
    BACKGROUND: For pathogens which cause infections that present asymptomatically, evaluating vaccine efficacy (VE) against asymptomatic infection is important for understanding a vaccine\'s potential epidemiological impact. Regular testing for subclinical infections is a potentially valuable strategy but its success hinges on participant adherence and minimising false positives. This paper describes the implementation and adherence to weekly testing in a COVID-19 vaccine trial.
    METHODS: COV002 was a phase 2/3 trial assessing the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Asymptomatic infections were detected using weekly self-administered swabs for RT-PCR testing. We analysed adherence using mixed-effects regression models and estimated the probability of true and false positive asymptomatic infections using estimates of adherence and testing characteristics.
    RESULTS: 356,551 tests were self-administered by 10,811 participants during the 13-month follow-up. Median adherence was 75.0% (IQR 42·6-90·9), which translated to a 74·5% (IQR 50·9-78·8) probability of detecting a positive asymptomatic infection during the swabbing period, and between 21 and 96 false positives during VE evaluation. The odds of returning a swab declined by 8% per week and further after testing positive and unblinding. Adherence was higher in older age groups, females and non-healthcare workers.
    CONCLUSIONS: The COV002 trial demonstrated the feasibility of running a long-term regular asymptomatic testing strategy. This information could be valuable for designing future phase III vaccine trials in which infection is an outcome.
    BACKGROUND: UK Research and Innovation, National Institutes for Health Research (NIHR), Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Thames Valley and South Midland\'s NIHR Clinical Research Network, AstraZeneca.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    男男性行为者(MSM)之间的性传播已成为主要的HIV传播途径。然而,在中国,已经进行了有限的研究来调查交易性行为(TS)与HIV发病率之间的关系。
    本研究旨在调查在中国从事TS(MSM-TS)的MSM中的HIV发病率,并区分与HIV发病率相关的社会人口统计学和性行为危险因素。
    我们使用基于微信的平台进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以评估中国MSM的HIV发病率。包括宁波的MSM-TS,从2019年7月至2022年6月招募。每次访问,参与者在接受线下HIV检测之前,在微信平台上完成了一份问卷并预约了HIV咨询和检测.HIV发病率密度计算为HIV血清转化数除以随访的人年(PYs),进行单因素和多因素Cox比例风险回归,以确定与HIV发病率相关的因素.
    共有932名参与者贡献了630.9个PYs的随访,在研究期间观察到25例HIV血清转化,导致每100个PYs的HIV发病率估计为4.0(95%CI2.7-5.8)。MSM-TS中的HIV发病率为每100个PYs18.4(95%CI8.7-34.7),显着高于不从事TS的MSM中每100个PYs3.2(95%CI2.1-5.0)的发生率。在调整了社会人口统计学特征后,与HIV感染相关的因素是MSM-TS(调整后的风险比[AHR]3.93,95%CI1.29-11.93),与男性发生无保护性行为(aHR10.35,95%CI2.25-47.69),并且在过去6个月中有多个男性性伴侣(aHR3.43,95%CI1.22-9.64)。
    这项研究发现,宁波的MSM-TS中HIV的发病率很高,中国。与艾滋病毒发病率相关的危险因素包括TS,与男人发生无保护的性行为,有多个男性性伴侣.这些发现强调需要制定有针对性的干预措施,并提供全面的医疗服务,艾滋病毒检测,和MSM的暴露前预防,特别是那些从事TS的人。
    UNASSIGNED: Sexual transmission among men who have sex with men (MSM) has become the major HIV transmission route. However, limited research has been conducted to investigate the association between transactional sex (TS) and HIV incidence in China.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to investigate HIV incidence and distinguish sociodemographic and sexual behavioral risk factors associated with HIV incidence among MSM who engage in TS (MSM-TS) in China.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a prospective cohort study using a WeChat-based platform to evaluate HIV incidence among Chinese MSM, including MSM-TS in Ningbo, recruited from July 2019 until June 2022. At each visit, participants completed a questionnaire and scheduled an appointment for HIV counseling and testing on the WeChat-based platform before undergoing offline HIV tests. HIV incidence density was calculated as the number of HIV seroconversions divided by person-years (PYs) of follow-up, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was conducted to identify factors associated with HIV incidence.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 932 participants contributed 630.9 PYs of follow-up, and 25 HIV seroconversions were observed during the study period, resulting in an estimated HIV incidence of 4.0 (95% CI 2.7-5.8) per 100 PYs. The HIV incidence among MSM-TS was 18.4 (95% CI 8.7-34.7) per 100 PYs, which was significantly higher than the incidence of 3.2 (95% CI 2.1-5.0) per 100 PYs among MSM who do not engage in TS. After adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics, factors associated with HIV acquisition were MSM-TS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.93, 95% CI 1.29-11.93), having unprotected sex with men (aHR 10.35, 95% CI 2.25-47.69), and having multiple male sex partners (aHR 3.43, 95% CI 1.22-9.64) in the past 6 months.
    UNASSIGNED: This study found a high incidence of HIV among MSM-TS in Ningbo, China. The risk factors associated with HIV incidence include TS, having unprotected sex with men, and having multiple male sex partners. These findings emphasize the need for developing targeted interventions and providing comprehensive medical care, HIV testing, and preexposure prophylaxis for MSM, particularly those who engage in TS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:亚特兰大的四个县,美国“结束艾滋病毒流行”(EHE)倡议目前将佐治亚州20个县的符合条件的大都市区(EMA)列为优先事项,该倡议的目标是到2030年将艾滋病毒发病率降低90%。造成亚特兰大艾滋病毒流行的差异需要对当地服务的可用性进行检查,未满足的需求和实现EHE目标的组织能力。我们对亚特兰大EMA进行了混合方法评估,以检查地理HIV流行病学和服务分布,EHE计划每个支柱的服务需求和组织基础设施。
    方法:我们收集了2021年县级数据(2022年6月),来自多个来源,包括:AIDSVu(艾滋病毒流行率和新诊断),疾病控制和预防中心基于网络的工具(艾滋病毒检测和暴露前预防[PrEP]地点)和佐治亚州公共卫生部(艾滋病毒检测,PrEP筛查,病毒抑制和合作伙伴服务访谈)。我们还向在EMA的主要艾滋病毒护理机构工作的主要当地利益相关者分发了一份在线调查,以评估服务的可用性。未满足的需求和组织基础设施(2022年6月至12月)。组织实施变革的准备情况调查表评估了需要扩大或实施的服务的组织氛围。
    结果:我们发现了整个EMA在HIV疾病负担和服务可用性方面的种族/族裔和地理差异,特别是在EMA南部县的HIV检测和PrEP方面。EHE目前没有优先考虑的五个县(克莱顿,道格拉斯,亨利,Newton和Rockdale)占EMA新诊断的16%,但在其177个测试站点中<9%,在其130个PrEP站点中<7%。调查受访者(N=48;42%的卫生机构经理/主任)报告说,对艾滋病毒自我检测试剂盒的需求尚未满足,移动诊所测试,艾滋病毒病例管理,同伴外展和导航,综合护理,住房支持和运输服务。受访者强调,现有人员配置和基础设施不足以促进必要的服务扩展,以及减少不平等和解决交叉污名的需要。
    结论:所有EHE支柱的服务交付必须大大扩展,以实现国家目标并解决亚特兰大都会区的艾滋病毒差异。关于艾滋病毒流行病学和服务提供的高分辨率地理数据以及社区投入可以提供有针对性的指导,以支持当地的EHE工作。
    BACKGROUND: Four counties within the Atlanta, Georgia 20-county eligible metropolitan area (EMA) are currently prioritized by the US \"Ending the HIV Epidemic\" (EHE) initiative which aims for a 90% reduction in HIV incidence by 2030. Disparities driving Atlanta\'s HIV epidemic warrant an examination of local service availability, unmet needs and organizational capacity to reach EHE targets. We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation of the Atlanta EMA to examine geographic HIV epidemiology and distribution of services, service needs and organization infrastructure for each pillar of the EHE initiative.
    METHODS: We collected 2021 county-level data (during June 2022), from multiple sources including: AIDSVu (HIV prevalence and new diagnoses), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention web-based tools (HIV testing and pre-exposure prophylaxis [PrEP] locations) and the Georgia Department of Public Health (HIV testing, PrEP screenings, viral suppression and partner service interviews). We additionally distributed an online survey to key local stakeholders working at major HIV care agencies across the EMA to assess the availability of services, unmet needs and organization infrastructure (June-December 2022). The Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change questionnaire assessed the organization climate for services in need of scale-up or implementation.
    RESULTS: We found racial/ethnic and geographic disparities in HIV disease burden and service availability across the EMA-particularly for HIV testing and PrEP in the EMA\'s southern counties. Five counties not currently prioritized by EHE (Clayton, Douglas, Henry, Newton and Rockdale) accounted for 16% of the EMA\'s new diagnoses, but <9% of its 177 testing sites and <7% of its 130 PrEP sites. Survey respondents (N = 48; 42% health agency managers/directors) reported high unmet need for HIV self-testing kits, mobile clinic testing, HIV case management, peer outreach and navigation, integrated care, housing support and transportation services. Respondents highlighted insufficient existing staffing and infrastructure to facilitate the necessary expansion of services, and the need to reduce inequities and address intersectional stigma.
    CONCLUSIONS: Service delivery across all EHE pillars must substantially expand to reach national goals and address HIV disparities in metro Atlanta. High-resolution geographic data on HIV epidemiology and service delivery with community input can provide targeted guidance to support local EHE efforts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2020年,在法国的COVID-19回应期间,来自医院和协会的医疗保健专业人员在马赛的脆弱社区发起了健康调解干预措施,由地区卫生当局资助。这项混合方法研究评估了持续到2022年6月的CORHESAN计划。
    我们检查了CORHESAN文件和报告,进行访谈,并分析了活动数据,将其与每周在邻里一级确定的COVID-19热点进行比较,使用广义线性混合模型(GLMM)。
    CORHESN由多达9名健康调解员组成的团队实施,临时聘用了六名私人护士,由一名总协调员和两名兼职医疗和护理协调员监督。与庇护所建立了多种伙伴关系,协会,社会住房房东和当地机构。该团队陪同6,253名受COVID-19或接触者影响的人实际实施隔离和接触者追踪。在用于RT-PCR的5,180个鼻咽样本和用于抗原检测的1,875个样本中:12%在家中,27%在目标社区的伙伴设施中;32%取自有症状的患者,30%取自接触者追踪;40%为阳性。在街头举行了多次关于预防方法和分发个人防护包和自我诊断测试的提高认识会议,在避难所,在协会或在家里。在一个步入式疫苗接种中心共接种了5929剂COVID-19疫苗,在临时街道疫苗接种站,在合作伙伴设施的运营期间,或在对自主性有限的患者进行家访期间。GLMMs显示,干预措施显着针对具有社会经济劣势和/或过去测试不足的社区的测试干预措施(调整后的优势比(aOR),2.75[1.50-5.00])和具有高热点水平的那些(3级与0级的AOR,1.83[1.24-2.71])。
    大流行强调了健康调解干预措施在解决健康差异方面的潜力。在这个基础上,2022年7月开始了一项新计划,旨在加强马赛贫困地区的癌症筛查和疫苗接种。正在进行评估,以评估其活动和影响,并为未来的实施举措提供证据。
    UNASSIGNED: In 2020, during France\'s COVID-19 response, healthcare professionals from a hospital and an association initiated health mediation interventions in Marseille\'s vulnerable neighbourhoods, funded by the regional health authorities. This mixed method research evaluates the CORHESAN program that lasted until June 2022.
    UNASSIGNED: We examined CORHESAN documents and reports, conducted interviews, and analysed activity data, comparing it to the COVID-19 hotspots identified on a weekly basis at the neighbourhood level, using generalised linear mixed models (GLMMs).
    UNASSIGNED: CORHESAN was implemented by a team of up to nine health mediators, six private nurses hired on an ad hoc basis, supervised by a general coordinator and two part-time medical and nursing coordinators. Multiple partnerships were established with shelters, associations, social-housing landlords and local institutions. The team accompanied 6,253 people affected by COVID-19 or contact in the practical implementation of their isolation and contact tracing. Of the 5,180 nasopharyngeal samples for RT-PCR and 1,875 for antigenic testing: 12% were taken at home and 27% in partner facilities in the targeted neighbourhoods; 32% were taken from symptomatic patients and 30% in the context of contact tracing; and 40% were positive. Multiple awareness sessions on prevention methods and distributions of personal protection kits and self-diagnostic tests were conducted in the streets, in shelters, in associations or at home. A total of 5,929 doses of COVID-19 vaccine were administered in a walk-in vaccination centre, at temporary street vaccination posts, during operations at partner facilities, or during home-visits to patients with limited autonomy. GLMMs showed that the intervention significantly targeted its testing interventions in neighbourhoods with socioeconomic disadvantage and/or past under-testing (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.75 [1.50-5.00]) and those with high hotspot level (aOR for level-3 versus level-0, 1.83 [1.24-2.71]).
    UNASSIGNED: The pandemic emphasised the potential of health mediation interventions to address health disparities. Building on this, a new program began in July 2022, aiming at enhancing cancer screening and vaccinations in deprived areas of Marseille. Evaluations are ongoing to assess its activities and impact, and provide evidence to future implementation initiatives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:B族链球菌(GBS)是英国20-25%的孕妇携带的细菌,它可以在出生时从孕妇传播给婴儿。女性可以在怀孕期间使用阴道直肠拭子进行GBS测试,然而,这项测试目前在英国并不例行提供.正在进行一项大型临床试验,以确定常规测试的临床和成本效益(ISRCTN参考号ISRCTN49639731)。了解是否应该实施这种类型的测试的一个关键部分是女性对提供GBS测试的可接受性的看法,他们对测试程序的偏好和接受这些测试的意愿。
    目的:探讨妇女对妊娠B族链球菌(GBS)不同检测方法的可接受性的看法,包括自我擦拭程序。
    方法:使用半结构化访谈指南对19名妇女(5名孕妇和14名产后妇女)进行了访谈。使用系统的主题分析对访谈进行转录和分析。
    结果:研究结果表明,许多接受采访的女性并不担心被提供GBS测试,愿意提供样本,并对检测GBS的样本呈阳性。妇女在最佳采样时间上的喜好各不相同。一些人认为在怀孕期间接触给了他们时间来理解测试的目的,准备接下来可能发生的事情,并在需要时询问有关潜在治疗的问题。其他人认为分娩是在出生时提供准确的GBS运输结果并减少怀孕期间不必要的担忧的好时机。然而,妇女担心,由于时间的原因,她们可能无法做出明智的劳动决定,疼痛和快速分娩的前景。女性认为临床医生擦拭比自我取样更准确;然而,许多人认为临床医生拭子可能会令人尴尬,因此应该使用自我拭子来增加某些女性的摄入量。
    结论:总体而言,女性认为妊娠和分娩时间都是GBS检测的可接受时间.大多数人认为临床医生和自我擦拭程序都可以接受;然而,许多人都有首选的拭子选择,并认为女性应该选择她们最接受的拭子程序。重要的是,无论何时进行GBS擦拭,都应向妇女提供有关GBS测试及其怀孕过程的信息。
    BACKGROUND: Group B streptococcus (GBS) is a bacterium carried by 20-25 % of pregnant women in the UK, which can be transmitted from pregnant women to their babies at the time of birth. Women can be tested for GBS in pregnancy using a vaginal-rectal swab, however, this testing is currently not routinely offered in the UK. A large clinical trial is underway to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of routine testing (ISRCTN reference number ISRCTN49639731). A crucial part of understanding whether this type of test should be implemented is women\'s views on the acceptability of being offered GBS tests, their preferences towards testing procedures and their willingness to receive these tests.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore women\'s views on the acceptability of different methods of Group B streptococcal bacteria (GBS) testing in pregnancy, including self-swabbing procedures.
    METHODS: A convenience sample of 19 women (5 pregnant and 14 postpartum) were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using systematic thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: Findings show that many of the women interviewed were not concerned about being offered a GBS test, were willing to provide a sample and felt positive towards samples being taken to detect GBS. Women varied in their preferences on the best time for sampling. Some thought being approached during pregnancy gave them time to understand the purpose of testing, prepare for what may happen next and ask questions about potential treatment if needed. Others thought labour was a good time to provide accurate results on GBS carriage at birth and reduce unnecessary worry during pregnancy. However, women were concerned that they may be unable to make an informed decision in labour due to time, pain and the prospect of birthing quickly. Women perceived clinician swabbing as more accurate than self-sampling; however, many thought clinician swabbing might be embarrassing so self-swabs should be available to increase uptake for some women.
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, women thought both pregnancy and labour were acceptable times to test for GBS. The majority found both clinician and self-swabbing procedures acceptable; however, many had a preferred swabbing option and thought women should be given the choice of the swabbing procedure most acceptable to them. It is important that women are given information about GBS testing and its procedures in pregnancy regardless of when the GBS swabbing is performed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:男男性行为者(MSM)构成了感染HIV患者的重要群体。近年来,在中国,已经做出了一些努力来促进MSM中的HIV检测。
    目的:本研究旨在评估MSM中HIV检测覆盖率和与首次HIV检测相关的因素,为实现到2030年诊断95%HIV感染者的目标提供科学依据。
    方法:这项横断面研究是在2023年7月至2023年12月之间进行的。MSM是从阳光测试中招募的,“一个互联网平台,通过访问浙江省的微信公众号,使用基于位置的服务向MSM提供免费的HIV检测服务,中国。参与者被要求填写一份关于其人口统计学特征的问卷,性行为,物质使用,和艾滋病毒检测史。采用logistic回归模型分析首次HIV检测及其相关因素。
    结果:共有7629名MSM参与了这项研究,87.1%(6647)以前接受过HIV检测,12.9%(982)首次接受HIV检测。多因素logistic回归分析显示,首次HIV检测与年龄较小相关(校正比值比[aOR]2.55,95%CI1.91-3.42),较低的教育程度(AOR1.39,95%CI1.03-1.88),学生身份(AOR1.35,95%CI1.04-1.75),低收入(AOR1.55,95%CI1.16-2.08),插入性肛交作用(aOR1.28,95%CI1.05-1.56),双性恋(aOR1.69,95%CI1.40-2.03),性伴侣较少(aOR1.44,95%CI1.13-1.83),使用急速爆裂剂(AOR2.06,95%CI1.70-2.49),性伴侣的HIV状况未知(aOR1.40,95%CI1.17-1.69),缺乏对HIV暴露前预防的认识(aOR1.39,95%CI1.03-1.88),和离线HIV检测摄取(aOR2.08,95%CI1.80-2.41)。
    结论:在这项大型互联网调查之前,值得注意的12.9%(982/7629)的MSM从未接受过HIV检测。我们建议通过基于互联网的平台和同性恋应用程序加强艾滋病毒干预和检测,以促进MSM的检测,并实现到2030年诊断95%感染艾滋病毒的患者的目标。
    BACKGROUND: Men who have sex with men (MSM) constitute a significant population of patients infected with HIV. In recent years, several efforts have been made to promote HIV testing among MSM in China.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess HIV testing coverage and factors associated with first-time HIV testing among MSM to provide a scientific basis for achieving the goal of diagnosing 95% of patients infected with HIV by 2030.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted between July 2023 and December 2023. MSM were recruited from the \"Sunshine Test,\" an internet platform that uses location-based services to offer free HIV testing services to MSM by visiting the WeChat official account in Zhejiang Province, China. Participants were required to complete a questionnaire on their demographic characteristics, sexual behaviors, substance use, and HIV testing history. A logistic regression model was used to analyze first-time HIV testing and its associated factors.
    RESULTS: A total of 7629 MSM participated in the study, with 87.1% (6647) having undergone HIV testing before and 12.9% (982) undergoing HIV testing for the first time. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that first-time HIV testing was associated with younger age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.55, 95% CI 1.91-3.42), lower education (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.03-1.88), student status (aOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.04-1.75), low income (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 1.16-2.08), insertive anal sex role (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.05-1.56), bisexuality (aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.40-2.03), fewer sex partners (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.13-1.83), use of rush poppers (aOR 2.06, 95% CI 1.70-2.49), unknown HIV status of sex partners (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.17-1.69), lack of awareness of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (aOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.03-1.88), and offline HIV testing uptake (aOR 2.08, 95% CI 1.80-2.41).
    CONCLUSIONS: A notable 12.9% (982/7629) of MSM had never undergone HIV testing before this large internet survey. We recommend enhancing HIV intervention and testing through internet-based platforms and gay apps to promote testing among MSM and achieve the target of diagnosing 95% of patients infected with HIV by 2030.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:SARS-CoV-2的检测对于为重症高危人群提供早期COVID-19治疗和限制感染在社会中的传播至关重要。正确收集上呼吸道标本是在公共场所诊断SARS-CoV-2病毒的最关键步骤,在COVID-19大流行期间,在许多国家/地区,咽拭子是用于大规模检测的首选标本。然而,关于咽喉拭子是否对SARS-CoV-2诊断测试具有足够高的灵敏度仍然存在讨论,正如以前的研究报道的那样,灵敏度从52%到100%存在很大的差异。许多以前探索咽拭子诊断准确性的研究缺乏对采样技术的详细描述,这使得很难比较不同的诊断准确性结果。一些研究仅通过从口咽后壁收集标本来进行咽喉拭子,而其他人还包括用于SARS-CoV-2测试的pat扁桃体拭子。然而,研究表明,扁桃体可能对SARS-CoV-2具有组织嗜性,这可能会改善采样过程中SARS-CoV-2的检测。这可以解释报告的灵敏度变化,但是还没有临床研究探讨在咽喉拭子期间是否包括腭扁桃体的敏感性和患者不适的差异。
    目的:本研究的目的是检查包括腭扁桃体在内的咽喉拭子的敏感性和患者不适,而在SARS-CoV-2的分子测试中,仅擦拭后口咽壁。
    方法:我们将进行一项随机对照研究,比较从口咽后壁和腭扁桃体(干预组)或仅在口咽后壁(对照组)进行的咽拭子对SARS-CoV-2的分子检出率。参与者将以1:1的比例随机分配。所有参与者在参加试验时填写基线问卷,检查他们被测试的原因,症状,和以前的扁桃体切除术。随访问卷将发送给参与者,以探索测试后症状的发展。
    结果:在2022年11月10日至2022年12月22日期间,共有2315名参与者参加了这项研究。后续问卷的结果预计将于2024年初完成。
    结论:这项随机临床试验将为我们提供关于咽喉拭子(包括腭扁桃体标本)是否会提高SARS-CoV-2分子检测的诊断敏感性的信息。这些结果可以,因此,用于改进未来的测试建议,并提供有关SARS-CoV-2的组织嗜性的其他信息。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05611203;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05611203。
    DERR1-10.2196/47446。
    BACKGROUND: Testing for SARS-CoV-2 is essential to provide early COVID-19 treatment for people at high risk of severe illness and to limit the spread of infection in society. Proper upper respiratory specimen collection is the most critical step in the diagnosis of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in public settings, and throat swabs were the preferred specimens used for mass testing in many countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is still a discussion about whether throat swabs have a high enough sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing, as previous studies have reported a large variability in the sensitivity from 52% to 100%. Many previous studies exploring the diagnostic accuracy of throat swabs lack a detailed description of the sampling technique, which makes it difficult to compare the different diagnostic accuracy results. Some studies perform a throat swab by only collecting specimens from the posterior oropharyngeal wall, while others also include a swab of the palatine tonsils for SARS-CoV-2 testing. However, studies suggest that the palatine tonsils could have a tissue tropism for SARS-CoV-2 that may improve the SARS-CoV-2 detection during sampling. This may explain the variation of sensitivity reported, but no clinical studies have yet explored the differences in sensitivity and patient discomfort whether the palatine tonsils are included during the throat swab or not.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the sensitivity and patient discomfort of a throat swab including the palatine tonsils compared to only swabbing the posterior oropharyngeal wall in molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2.
    METHODS: We will conduct a randomized controlled study to compare the molecular detection rate of SARS-CoV-2 by a throat swab performed from the posterior oropharyngeal wall and the palatine tonsils (intervention group) or the posterior oropharyngeal wall only (control group). Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. All participants fill out a baseline questionnaire upon enrollment in the trial, examining their reason for being tested, symptoms, and previous tonsillectomy. A follow-up questionnaire will be sent to participants to explore the development of symptoms after testing.
    RESULTS: A total of 2315 participants were enrolled in this study between November 10, 2022, and December 22, 2022. The results from the follow-up questionnaire are expected to be completed at the beginning of 2024.
    CONCLUSIONS: This randomized clinical trial will provide us with information about whether throat swabs including specimens from the palatine tonsils will improve the diagnostic sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 molecular detection. These results can, therefore, be used to improve future testing recommendations and provide additional information about tissue tropism for SARS-CoV-2.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05611203; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05611203.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/47446.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景虽然GBMSM占加纳人口的不到2%,他们的艾滋病毒感染率超过全国平均水平八倍以上,强调迫切需要有针对性的干预措施来提高检测,护理联动,减少社区传播。这项研究旨在增加艾滋病毒检测,暴露前预防(PrEP),和抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)吸收(HPART)YGBMSM通过适应循证干预(LAFIYA)。方法我们将采用ADAPTT-IT框架来适应LAFIYA,并评估其在解决加纳贫民窟YGBMSM之间的交叉污名和增加HPART吸收方面的可行性和有效性。在目标1中,我们将在YGBMSM中举行焦点小组(n=5)和访谈(n=20),在GBMSM领导的组织中举行两个FGD。在HCF水平,我们将在护士中举行6次FGD和访谈(n=20)。在AIM2中,我们将随机分配6个医疗机构(HCF)来接收LAFIYA(n=3)或等待列表控制(n=3)。YGBMSM(N=240)的朋友组(集群)将被分配为接收LAFIYA(n=120)或等待列表控件(n=120)。我们将收集3,6-,以及YGBMSM(n=240)和HCWs(n=300)的干预后9个月数据,以测量HPART依从性(主要结果),ISD减少,HIV和状态中性知识(次要结果),和干预的可接受性,适当性,和可行性(实施结果)。结论干预组会观察到HPART依从性的提高,降低ISD,与等待名单对照组相比,HPART知识和疗效得到增强。调查结果将为减少ISD和艾滋病毒地位中立的实施战略以及基于地点的干预措施提供信息,以解决YGBMSM中获得艾滋病毒预防和护理的问题。贫民窟和不同的设置。跟踪注册这项研究在clinicalTrail.gov上注册,标识符号为NCT06312514,日期为2023年3月14日。https://经典。clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06312514.
    UNASSIGNED: While GBMSM constitute less than 2% of Ghana\'s population, their HIV prevalence surpasses the national average by more than eightfold, emphasizing the critical need for targeted interventions to improve detection, care linkage, and reduce community transmission. This study seeks to increase HIV testing, Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), and Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) uptake (HPART) among YGBMSM through the adaptation of an evidence-based intervention (LAFIYA).
    UNASSIGNED: We will employ the ADAPTT-IT framework to adapt LAFIYA and evaluate its feasibility and effectiveness in addressing intersectional stigma and increasing HPART uptake among YGBMSM residing in Ghanaian slums. In aim 1, we will hold focus groups (n=5) and interviews (n=20) among YGBMSM and two FGDs among GBMSM-led organizations. At the HCF level, we will hold 6 FGDs and interviews (n=20) among nurses. In AIM 2, we will randomly assign 6 healthcare facilities (HCFs) to receive the LAFIYA (n=3) or wait-list control (n=3). Friend groups (cluster) of YGBMSM (N=240) will be assigned to receive LAFIYA (n=120) or a wait-list control (n=120). We will collect 3-, 6-, and 9-months post-intervention data among YGBMSM(n=240) and HCWs(n=300) to measure HPART adherence (primary outcomes), ISD reduction, HIV and status-neutral knowledge (secondary outcomes), and intervention acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility (implementation outcomes).
    UNASSIGNED: The intervention group will observe increased HPART adherence, reduced ISD, and enhanced HPART knowledge and efficacy relative to the wait-list control group. The findings will inform ISD reduction and HIV status-neutral implementation strategies - and place-based interventions that address access to HIV prevention and care among YGBMSM, slum and in different settings.
    UNASSIGNED: This study was registered on clinicalTrail.gov, with identifier number NCT06312514 on 03/14/2023. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06312514.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项研究中,我们探讨了与加拿大国家接受HIV检测相关的因素.使用2015-16年加拿大社区健康调查并应用logistic回归分析,我们研究了HIV检测与安徒生医疗保健利用行为模型确定的因素之间的关联.我们发现一系列的诱因,启用,和需要因素与艾滋病毒检测显著相关。例如,与年龄最大的受访者(即55-64)相比,他们的年轻同行(即45-54,35-44和25-34)更有可能接受艾滋病毒检测.与加拿大大西洋相比,魁北克的受访者(OR=1.96,p<.001),安大略省(OR=1.44,p<.001),草原(OR=1.37,p<.001),不列颠哥伦比亚省(OR=1.99,p<.001),和领土(OR=2.22,p<.001)都更有可能接受艾滋病毒检测。基于这些发现,我们为政策制定者和未来的研究提供了一些重要的建议。
    In this study, we explore the factors associated with the uptake of HIV testing at the national level in Canada. Using the 2015-16 Canadian Community Health Survey and applying logistic regression analysis, we examine the associations between HIV testing and factors identified by the Andersen\'s behavioral model of healthcare utilization. We find that a range of predisposing, enabling, and need factors are significantly associated with HIV testing. For example, compared to the oldest respondents (i.e. 55-64), their younger counterparts (i.e. 45-54, 35-44, and 25-34) are more likely to have been tested for HIV. Compared to those in Atlantic Canada, respondents in Quebec (OR = 1.96, p < .001), Ontario (OR = 1.44, p < .001), Prairies (OR = 1.37, p < .001), British Columbia (OR = 1.99, p < .001), and the Territories (OR = 2.22, p < .001) are all more likely to have been tested for HIV. Based on these findings, we provide several important suggestions for policymakers and future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号