BACKGROUND: Traditional 3D motion analysis typically considers the spine as a rigid entity. Nevertheless, previous single-joint models have proven inadequate in evaluating the movement across different spinal segments in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS). Scoliosis significantly impairs movement functions, especially during activities such as ascending and descending stairs. There is a lack of research on the patterns of stair movement specifically for patients with IS.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate trunk kinematics in college students with IS during stair ascent and descent tasks. A total of 56 participants, 28 with IS and 28 with healthy controls, were recruited for this case-control study. The trunk movements were analyzed using a motion analysis system that incorporated a multisegment spine model. Understanding the multi-segment spine kinematics during stair tasks can contribute to the development of effective rehabilitation programs for individuals with IS.
METHODS: Case-control study.
METHODS: Twenty-eight IS and 28 controls.
METHODS: Cobb angle, spinal curvature, spinal active range of motion (ROM), Kinematics.
METHODS: The Qualisys system (Gothenburg, Sweden) was utilized in this study with a sampling frequency of 150 Hz. It recorded the kinematics in the thoracic, lumbar, thoracic cage, and pelvis while ascending and descending stairs for both the 28 IS individuals and the 28 control participants. Additionally, clinical parameters such as the Cobb angle, curvature of the spine, spinal range of motion (ROM), and other relevant factors were concurrently assessed among the subjects. Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82205306). The authors declare no conflict of interest in preparing this article.
RESULTS: The findings of this study revealed that IS individuals exhibited reduced kyphotic curvature in the sagittal plane (p<.05) when compared to the control group. In contrast, these IS patients displayed greater coronal curvature (Cobb angle) in the frontal plane and a more substantial difference in thoracic side bending range of motion in comparison to the control group (p.05). Moreover, during the ascending stair activity, IS patients showed reduced thoracic cage flexion-extension range of motion (p<.05), while displaying increased lumbar rotation range of motion and anterior-posterior pelvic tilt range of motion (p<.05) in contrast to the control group. Notably, the kinematic analysis during the descent of stairs indicated that IS patients exhibited a larger range of motion in thoracic flexion-extension, thoracic side bending, thoracic cage side bending, thoracic rotation, and thoracic cage rotation when compared to the control group (p<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The results showed significant differences in trunk kinematics between the two groups during both stair ascent and descent tasks. The utilization of the \"multisegment spine model\" facilitates the acquisition of motion information across multiple segments of the spine in patients diagnosed with IS, effectively enhancing the assessment outcomes derived from imaging information. The three-dimensional structural deformity in the trunk affects both static and dynamic activity patterns. In different activity states, IS patients demonstrate stiff movements in certain segments while experiencing compensatory instability in others. In the future, clinical rehabilitation programs for IS should prioritize stair-related activity training.

UNASSIGNED: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection may decrease respiratory and physical functions.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate whether robot-assisted stair climbing training (RASCT) would improve pulmonary and physical functions in a patient post-severe COVID-19 infection.
UNASSIGNED: A 48-year-old woman who had experienced severe COVID-19 underwent a 6-week inpatient rehabilitation. She persistently exhibited impaired pulmonary and physical functions, including walking and balance impairment. We provided a 30-min outpatient RASCT biweekly for 6 weeks.
UNASSIGNED: After training, maximal inspiratory and maximal expiratory pressures improved from 81 and 74 cmH2O to 104 and 81 cmH2O, respectively. The walking speed improved from 1.15 to 1.21 m/s. In balance ability, physical performance battery score and timed up-and-go test improved from 8 to 11 s and 10.89 to 9.95 s, respectively. Regarding exercise capacity, the 6-min walk test distance improved from 453 to 482 m, and the number of 1-min sit-to-stand test improved from 20 to 23, with improved pulse rate and saturation level. The physical and psychological domain scores of the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale-BREF improved from 44 to 63 and 69 to 81, respectively; Falls Efficacy Scale-International scores improved from 38 to 21.
UNASSIGNED: RASCT, as part of a rehabilitation plan, was feasible and effective for this patient after severe COVID-19 infection.

BACKGROUND: To raise the effectiveness of interventions, clinicians should evaluate important biopsychosocial aspects of the patient\'s situation. There is limited knowledge of which factors according to the International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health (ICF) are most deviant between patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and healthy individuals. To assist in measures\' selection, we aimed to quantify the differences between patients with KOA and healthy controls on various measures across the ICF dimensions of body function, activity, and participation.
METHODS: We performed an exploratory cross-sectional case-control study. In total, 28 patients with mild-to-moderate KOA (mean age 61 years, 64% women) referred by general physicians to a hospital\'s osteoarthritis-school, and 31 healthy participants (mean age 55 years, 52% women), volunteered. We compared between-group differences on 27 physical and self-reported measures derived from treatment guidelines, trial recommendations, and trial/outcome reviews. Independent t-test, Chi-square, and Mann-Whitney U test evaluated the significance for continuous parametric, dichotomous, and ordinal data, respectively. For parametric data, effect sizes were calculated as Cohen\'s d. For non-parametric data, ds were estimated by p-values and sample sizes according to statistical formulas. Finally, all ds were ranked and interpreted after Hopkins\' scale. An age-adjusted sensitivity-analysis on parametric data validated those conclusions.
RESULTS: Very large differences between patients and controls were found on the Pain numeric rating scale1, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Scale (KOOS, all subscales)2, as well as the Örebro Musculoskeletal psychosocial scale3 (P < 0.0001). Large differences were found on the Timed 10-steps-up-and-down stair climb test4 and Accelerometer registered vigorous-intensity physical activity in daily life5 (P < 0.001). Respectively, these measures clustered on ICF as follows: 1body function, 2all three ICF-dimensions, 3body function and participation, 4activity, and 5participation.
CONCLUSIONS: The limited sample excluded elderly patients with severe obesity.
CONCLUSIONS: Very large differences across all ICF dimensions were indicated for the KOOS and Örebro questionnaires together for patients aged 45-70 with KOA. Clinicians are suggested to use them as means of selecting supplementary measures with appropriate discriminative characteristics and clear links to effective therapy. Confirmative studies are needed to further validate these explorative and partly age-unadjusted conclusions.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate risk and protective factors for stair falls in children aged <5 years.
METHODS: Multicentre case-control study at hospitals, minor injury units and general practices in and around four UK study centres. Cases were children with medically attended stair fall injuries. Controls were matched on age, sex, calendar time and study centre. A total of 610 cases and 2658 controls participated.
RESULTS: Cases\' most common injuries were bangs on the head (66%), cuts/grazes not requiring stitches (14%) and fractures (12%). Parents of cases were significantly more likely not to have stair gates (adjusted OR (AOR) 2.50, 95% CI 1.90 to 3.29; population attributable fraction (PAF) 21%) or to leave stair gates open (AOR 3.09, 95% CI 2.39 to 4.00; PAF 24%) both compared with having closed stair gates. They were more likely not to have carpeted stairs (AOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.10; PAF 5%) and not to have a landing part-way up their stairs (AOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.65; PAF 18%). They were more likely to consider their stairs unsafe to use (AOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.99; PAF 5%) or to be in need of repair (AOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.50; PAF 5%).
CONCLUSIONS: Structural factors including having landings part-way up the stairs and keeping stairs in good repair were associated with reduced stair fall injury risk. Family factors including having stair gates, not leaving gates open and having stair carpets were associated with reduced injury risk. If these associations are causal, addressing these factors in housing policy and routine child health promotion could reduce stair fall injuries.