Social Justice

社会正义
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    受大规模和长期工业污染影响的社区通常渴望了解他们的健康是否因这种污染而受到损害。这需要将环境公共卫生和环境正义观点结合起来的答案。在这些地点,随着时间的推移,多种化学品造成的环境污染的暴露情景,通常涉及不同的环境矩阵,重建是复杂且具有挑战性的。
    提出了一种描述与环境污染相关的此类社区健康的方法,这些方法应用于环境污染的三个领域,人群暴露和毒理学,环境和社会流行病学,和环境公共卫生传播。从应用到托雷斯港的案例研究,都用实例描述了该方法,具有实质性工业条件演变的城镇。
    环境污染领域的活动,人口暴露和毒理学侧重于现有污染数据的收集和系统化,根据其毒理学特征确定优先污染物,对人群暴露于优先污染物的可能性及其已知健康影响的定性评估。环境和社会流行病学方法用于描述当地人口的健康状况和社会经济状况,考虑到来自当地信息系统的多种健康结果,并根据暴露和毒理学评估考虑特定疾病。环境公共卫生沟通方法旨在制定沟通计划,并通过与当地机构和社会行为者的互动来实施。对健康概况的解释得益于对结果的跨学科分析。
    拟议的方法结合了环境公共卫生和环境正义的需求,允许整合多学科知识,以定义减少和/或预防危险环境暴露和不利健康影响的建议。刺激利益相关者之间的互动,使公民更容易获得研究结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Communities affected by large scale and long lasting industrial contamination are often keen to understand whether their health has been impaired by such contamination. This requires answers that integrate environmental public health and environmental justice perspectives. At these sites, exposure scenarios from environmental contamination over time by multiple chemicals, often involving different environmental matrices, are complex and challenging to reconstruct.
    UNASSIGNED: An approach for describing the health of such communities in association with environmental contamination is presented, with the methods applied across the three domains of environmental contamination, population exposure and toxicology, environmental and social epidemiology, and environmental public health communication. The approach is described with examples from its application to the case study of Porto Torres, a town with a substantial industrially conditioned evolution.
    UNASSIGNED: Activities in the field of environmental contamination, population exposure and toxicology focus on the collection and systematization of available contamination data, the identification of priority pollutants based on their toxicological profiles, the qualitative assessment of the likelihood of exposure for the population to priority pollutants and their known health effects. Environmental and social epidemiology methods are applied to describe the health profiles and socioeconomic conditions of the local population, taking into account multiple health outcomes from local information systems and considering specific diseases based on exposure and toxicological assessments. The environmental public health communication methods are directed to produce a communication plan and for its implementation through interaction with local institutional and social actors. The interpretation of health profiles benefits from a transdisciplinary analysis of the results.
    UNASSIGNED: The proposed approach combines the needs of environmental public health and environmental justice allowing the integration of multidisciplinary knowledge to define recommendations for reducing and/or preventing hazardous environmental exposures and adverse health effects, stimulating the interactions between stakeholders, and making the study results more accessible to citizens.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    粮食安全是一个具有不断演变的定义和含义的概念,由有争议的知识和不断变化的环境塑造。政府对粮食安全的理解方式会影响公共政策如何解决这一问题。这项研究调查了1994年至2023年塔斯马尼亚食品和营养政策中话语和实践的演变。使用定性文档分析对四个基础文档进行了分析,揭示了三十年来持续存在的粮食不安全问题。该分析确定了解决营养相关健康问题和粮食不安全的持续政策挑战的双重性:促进公共卫生改善和保护塔斯马尼亚经济之间的平衡行为。研究表明,从1994年到2023年,塔斯马尼亚的食品和营养政策和战略具有各种转变和紧张的特点。传统方法,主要强调粮食供应,在有限的程度上,access,坚持了三十多年。向更现代的粮食安全方法过渡,结合使用的尺寸,稳定性,可持续性和机构,明显缓慢,表明系统惯性。这表明未来政策演变的机会,走向动态和全面的方法。这种方法将超越粮食供应的狭隘重点,解决粮食安全的复杂多层面性质。
    Food security is a concept with evolving definitions and meanings, shaped by contested knowledge and changing contexts. The way in which food security is understood by governments impacts how it is addressed in public policy. This research investigates the evolution of discourses and practices in Tasmanian food and nutrition policies from 1994 to 2023. Four foundational documents were analysed using qualitative document analysis, revealing persistent food insecurity issues over three decades. The analysis identified a duality in addressing the persistent policy challenges of nutrition-related health issues and food insecurity: the balancing act between advancing public health improvements and safeguarding Tasmania\'s economy. The research revealed that from 1994 to 2023, Tasmania\'s food and nutrition policies and strategies have been characterised by various transitions and tensions. Traditional approaches, predominantly emphasising food availability and, to a limited extent, access, have persisted for over thirty years. The transition towards a more contemporary approach to food security, incorporating dimensions of utilisation, stability, sustainability, and agency, has been markedly slow, indicating systemic inertia. This points to an opportunity for future policy evolution, to move towards a dynamic and comprehensive approach. Such an approach would move beyond the narrow focus of food availability to address the complex multi-dimensional nature of food security.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在日本,医生在地理上的不公平分配长期以来一直是一个严重的社会问题。政府通过建立和管理Jichi医科大学(JMU)和医学院的地区配额(RQ)来解决这一问题。JMU/RQ招募希望在农村地区担任医生的当地学生,教育他们6年没有学费(JMU)或奖学金(RQs),毕业后,将他们分配到他们的家乡9年,包括4-6年的农村服务。JMU/RQ进入者现在占所有医学院进入者的11.6%。虽然JMU/RQ已被证明在确保农村地区的医生方面非常有效,与这些政策相关的道德问题已经被提出,比如政府是否真的需要用税收来实施这些政策,以及限制医生的个人自由是否可以接受。在本文中,我们从社会正义的角度讨论这些问题,功利主义,运气平均主义,自由,医疗专业精神以及与国家健康保险和日本宪法的一致性。我们得出的结论是,JMU/RQ是必要的和道德上有效的政策,并提出一些制度改进,以更好地确保这些系统的完整性和成熟度。
    The geographically inequitable distribution of physicians has long posed a serious social problem in Japan. The government tackled this problem by establishing and managing Jichi Medical University (JMU) and regional quotas (RQs) for medical schools. JMU/RQs recruit local students who hope to work as physicians in rural areas, educate them for 6 years without tuition (JMU) or with scholarship (RQs), and after graduation, assign them to their home prefectures for 9 years, including 4-6 years of rural service. JMU/RQs entrants now occupy 11.6% of all medical school entrants. While JMU/RQs have been shown to be highly effective in securing physicians for rural areas, ethical issues related to these policies have been raised, such as whether the government truly needs to implement these policies using tax money, and whether it is acceptable to limit the personal freedoms of the physicians. In this paper, we discuss these issues from the perspectives of social justice, utilitarianism, luck egalitarianism, liberty, medical professionalism and consistency with national health insurance and the Japanese Constitution. We conclude that JMU/RQs are necessary and ethically valid policies, and also propose some institutional improvements to better secure the integrity and maturity of these systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于绿色和蓝色空间的健康益处的基于证据的信息的研究通常在其设计中,潜在的内在或内隐偏见,可以无意识地将此类研究的结果导向先入为主的假设。许多研究都位于特定或通用的绿色和蓝色空间附近(因此,构成绿色或蓝色空间主导的方法),其他是由于绿色和蓝色空间数据的可用性而进行的(因此,应用绿色或蓝色空间数据引导方法),虽然其他研究是由特定健康状况与存在的特定兴趣形成的,或与绿色或蓝色空间的约定(因此,采用健康或健康状况主导的方法)。为了解决这种偏见并开发更客观的研究设计,以研究人类健康结果与绿色和蓝色空间之间的关联,本文讨论了适用于该目的的方法论框架的特点,长达一年,爱尔兰探索性研究。本研究探索的创新方法(即,Thehealth-dataledapproach)firstidentifysamplessiteswithgoodandbadhealthoutcomesfromavailablehealthdata(usingdataclusteringtechniques)beforeexaminingthepotentialroleofthepresenceof,或参与绿色和蓝色空间创造这样的健康结果。通过这样做,我们认为,与其他三种方法相关的一些偏见可以减少甚至消除。最后,我们推断,健康数据主导方法采用的原则和范式可以适用和有效地分析人类健康结果与绿色和蓝色空间之间的关联之外的其他可持续性问题(例如,健康,能源,食物,收入,环境和气候的不平等和正义等。).本文还讨论了这种可能性。
    Research producing evidence-based information on the health benefits of green and blue spaces often has within its design, the potential for inherent or implicit bias which can unconsciously orient the outcomes of such studies towards preconceived hypothesis. Many studies are situated in proximity to specific or generic green and blue spaces (hence, constituting a green or blue space led approach), others are conducted due to availability of green and blue space data (hence, applying a green or blue space data led approach), while other studies are shaped by particular interests in the association of particular health conditions with presence of, or engagements with green or blue spaces (hence, adopting a health or health status led approach). In order to tackle this bias and develop a more objective research design for studying associations between human health outcomes and green and blue spaces, this paper discussed the features of a methodological framework suitable for that purpose after an initial, year-long, exploratory Irish study. The innovative approach explored by this study (i.e., the health-data led approach) first identifies sample sites with good and poor health outcomes from available health data (using data clustering techniques) before examining the potential role of the presence of, or engagement with green and blue spaces in creating such health outcomes. By doing so, we argue that some of the bias associated with the other three listed methods can be reduced and even eliminated. Finally, we infer that the principles and paradigm adopted by the health data led approach can be applicable and effective in analyzing other sustainability problems beyond associations between human health outcomes and green and blue spaces (e.g., health, energy, food, income, environment and climate inequality and justice etc.). The possibility of this is also discussed within this paper.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:越来越多,边缘化社区不成比例地面临环境危害的日益恶化的影响,包括空气污染,水污染,和气候变化。语言隔离和可及性已被作为健康的决定因素进行了充分研究。西班牙语,尽管是美国第二常见的语言,约有4180万使用者,在环境健康科学家中被忽视了。建设高质量的西班牙语科学传播能力,对于科学和非科学的观众来说,可以改善健康差异研究,公共卫生素养,国际合作,多样性和包容性的努力。
    目的:在本文中,我们讨论了环境健康科学中语言多样性的背景,并为改善西班牙语的科学交流提供了建议。
    结论:英语目前是科学话语的主要语言,但是西班牙语和其他非英语语言经常被许多环境健康科学的学生和专业人士使用,以及许多公众。为了更有效地开展和传达西班牙语的环境卫生工作,我们建议研究人员和科研机构a)促进结构变革,b)培训新兴学者并支持既有研究人员,C)利用社区的知识方式,d)利用新兴技术。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12306.
    Increasingly, marginalized communities are disproportionately facing the worsening effects of environmental hazards, including air pollution, water pollution, and climate change. Language isolation and accessibility has been understudied as a determinant of health. Spanish, despite being the second-most common language in the United States with some 41.8 million speakers, has been neglected among environmental health scientists. Building capacity in high-quality Spanish-language science communication, both for scientific and nonscientific audiences, can yield improvements in health disparities research, public health literacy, international collaborations, and diversity and inclusion efforts.
    In this article, we discuss the context of language diversity in environmental health sciences and offer recommendations for improving science communication in Spanish.
    English is currently the predominant language for scientific discourse, but Spanish and other non-English languages are routinely used by many environmental health science students and professionals, as well as much of the public. To more effectively conduct and communicate environmental health work in Spanish, we suggest that researchers and scientific institutions a) foster structural changes, b) train emerging scholars and support established researchers, c) tap into community ways of knowing, and d) leverage emerging technologies. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12306.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于潜在基因组编辑技术的使用分配不平等,社会正义一直存在担忧。在非理想理论中工作,科林·法雷利提出了使用专利的理由,以加快为所有人提供安全有效的干预措施,包括社会弱势群体。本文认为,当人们在生物技术创新的背景下考虑专利的实际功能和专利制度的实际含义时,这种成功就不那么可靠了。我认为,非理想的理论方法有可能回到理想理论的一种形式,如果它们只是指现实世界的约束——例如专利——但没有批判性地评估和全面检查这些约束在实践中是如何表现出来的。我强调了一些重要的考虑因素,以便在生物技术发展中发展和促进更强大的非理想司法方法。
    There are ongoing concerns of social justice regarding inequalities in the distribution of access to potential genome editing technologies. Working within non-ideal theory, Colin Farrelly advances a justification for the use of patents to speed up the arrival of safe and effective interventions for all, including the socially disadvantaged. This paper argues that such success is less assured when one considers the actual functioning of patents and the practical implications of the patent system in the context of biotechnological innovations. I suggest that non-ideal theoretical approaches risk reverting back to a form of ideal theory if they simply refer to such real-world constraints - e.g. patents - but do not critically assess and fully examine how such constraints manifest themselves in practice. I highlight some considerations that would be important in order to develop and foster a more robust non-ideal approach to justice in biotechnological developments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号