This paper aims to evaluate the statistical association between exposure to air pollution and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) in both asthmatic and non-asthmatic children and teenagers, in which the response variable FEV1 was repeatedly measured on a monthly basis, characterizing a longitudinal experiment. Due to the nature of the data, an robust linear mixed model (RLMM), combined with a robust principal component analysis (RPCA), is proposed to handle the multicollinearity among the covariates and the impact of extreme observations (high levels of air contaminants) on the estimates. The Huber and Tukey loss functions are considered to obtain robust estimators of the parameters in the linear mixed model (LMM). A finite sample size investigation is conducted under the scenario where the covariates follow linear time series models with and without additive outliers (AO). The impact of the time-correlation and the outliers on the estimates of the fixed effect parameters in the LMM is investigated. In the real data analysis, the robust model strategy evidenced that RPCA exhibits three principal component (PC), mainly related to relative humidity (Hmd), particulate matter with a diameter smaller than 10 μm (PM10) and particulate matter with a diameter smaller than 2.5 μm (PM2.5).

The vulnerability of modern neural networks to random noise and deliberate attacks has raised concerns about their robustness, particularly as they are increasingly utilized in safety- and security-critical applications. Although recent research efforts were made to enhance robustness through retraining with adversarial examples or employing data augmentation techniques, a comprehensive investigation into the effects of training data perturbations on model robustness remains lacking. This paper presents the first extensive empirical study investigating the influence of data perturbations during model retraining. The experimental analysis focuses on both random and adversarial robustness, following established practices in the field of robustness analysis. Various types of perturbations in different aspects of the dataset are explored, including input, label, and sampling distribution. Single-factor and multi-factor experiments are conducted to assess individual perturbations and their combinations. The findings provide insights into constructing high-quality training datasets for optimizing robustness and recommend the appropriate degree of training set perturbations that balance robustness and correctness, and contribute to understanding model robustness in deep learning and offer practical guidance for enhancing model performance through perturbed retraining, promoting the development of more reliable and trustworthy deep learning systems for safety-critical applications.

UNASSIGNED: The locked vision plan can make the left breast cancer heart and lung organs dose.
UNASSIGNED: The aim of the present study was to compare the dosimetric differences between field-locked and field-split plans in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer, to explore the effect of field-locking on the low-dose region, and to evaluate its robustness to the radiotherapy target, in order to provide a reference for the selection of clinical radiotherapy protocols.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 30 patients were selected after radical left breast cancer surgery, and 7-field locked-field and split-field plans were developed to compare the dose difference (∆D) between the target area and each organ at risk, and to introduce offsets of 3, 5 and 7 mm in six directions and recalculate the perturbed dose distributions, and to compare the ∆D between the original and the perturbed plans according to the robustness of the plans.
UNASSIGNED: The results revealed that the D98%, D95% and Dmean values of the planning target volume (PTV) of the two plans differed little and were not statistically different. The locked field plan provided better protection for the left lung, right lung, heart, right breast and left anterior descending coronary artery. For PTV∆D98%, PTV∆D95%, PTV∆Dmean, the ∆D was higher for the Locked Fields plan, and for LungL∆5, LungL∆20 and Heart∆mean, the ∆D was higher for the original plan.
UNASSIGNED: It was concluded that the field-locking plan could reduce the low-dose area of the affected lung and provide improved protection to the remaining critical organs, and the field-locking plan was more robust in protecting critical organs. Meanwhile, the field-locking plan showed higher sensitivity to positional deviation for target PTV.

We recently revealed significant variability in protein corona characterization across various proteomics facilities, indicating that data sets are not comparable between independent studies. This heterogeneity mainly arises from differences in sample preparation protocols, mass spectrometry workflows, and raw data processing. To address this issue, we developed standardized protocols and unified sample preparation workflows, distributing uniform protein corona digests to several top-performing proteomics centers from our previous study. We also examined the influence of using similar mass spectrometry instruments on data homogeneity and standardized database search parameters and data processing workflows. Our findings reveal a remarkable stepwise improvement in protein corona data uniformity, increasing overlaps in protein identification from 11% to 40% across facilities using similar instruments and through a uniform database search. We identify the key parameters behind data heterogeneity and provide recommendations for designing experiments. Our findings should significantly advance the robustness of protein corona analysis for diagnostic and therapeutics applications.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) is greatly affected by anatomy variations that might occur during the treatment course. Online plan adaptations have been proposed as a solution to intervene promptly during a treatment session once the anatomy changes are detected. The implementation of online-adaptive proton therapy (OAPT) is still hindered by time-consuming tasks in the workflow.
OBJECTIVE: The study introduces the novel concept of partial adaptation and aims at investigating its feasibility as a potential solution to parallelize tasks during an OAPT workflow for saving valuable in-room time.
METHODS: The proof-of-principle simulation study includes datasets from six head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, each consisting of one planning CT (pCT) and three contoured control CTs (cCTs). Robust 3-field normo-fractionated initial IMPT plans were generated on the pCTs with a standardized field configuration, delivering 66 Gy and 54 Gy to the high-risk and low-risk clinical target volume (CTVHigh and CTVLow), respectively. For each cCT, a dose-mimicking-based partial adaptation was applied: two fields were adapted on the current anatomy taking into account the background dose of the first non-adapted field supposedly delivered in the meantime. Fraction doses on the cCTs resulting from partially adapted plans with different first (non-adapted) field assignments were compared against those from non-adapted and fully adapted plans regarding target coverage and organs at risk (OARs) sparing. The robustness of partially adapted plans was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Partially adapted plans showed comparable results to fully adapted plans and were superior to non-adapted plans for both target coverage and OAR sparing. Target coverage degradation in the non-adapted plans (median D98%: 95.9% and 97.5% for CTVLow and CTVHigh, respectively) was recovered by both partial (98.0% and 98.5%) and full adaptation (98.2% and 98.7%) in comparison to the initial plans (98.7% and 98.8%). The initial hotspot dose for the CTVHigh (median D2%: 101.8%) increased in the non-adapted plans (102.9%) and was recovered by the adaptive strategies (partial: 102.5%, full: 101.9%). The near-maximum dose (D0.01cc) to brainstem and spinal cord was within clinical constraints for all investigated dose distributions, but clearly increased for no adaptation and improved in the (both partially and fully) adapted plans with respect to the non-adapted ones. The parotids\' median doses (D50) were mainly patient-specific depending on the proximity to the target region, but anyway lower for the partially and fully adapted plans compared to the non-adapted ones. OAR sparing was furthermore improved for the partially adapted plans in comparison to full adaptation. Robustness of the target dose metrics was preserved in all evaluated scenarios.
CONCLUSIONS: For OAPT of HNC patients, partial adaptation is able to generate plans of superior conformity to non-adapted plans and of comparable conformity as fully adapted plans, while having the potential to speed up the online-adaptive workflows. Thus, partial adaptation represents an intermediate approach until fast online adaptation workflows become available. Furthermore, it can be applied in workflows where online treatment verification stops the delivery and triggers an online adaptation for the remaining fraction.

The aim of this work was to develop a supercritical fluid chromatographic method to study the applicability of this emerging technique to cannabinoid analysis and showcase its advantages. During method development, the authors focused on nine phyto-cannabinoids to assess the selectivity needed to potentially perform the quantitation of each cannabinoid. After method development, robustness studies were carried out on this method to gain more information about its qualitative behavior (in terms of critical resolutions) when varying some crucial parameters (concentration of additive, column temperature, starting gradient conditions and column batch). Once the robustness was evaluated and the parameters most affecting the selected responses were individuated, the SFC method was applied for a simulated routine use to generate quantitative results concerning the concentrations of the main cannabinoids in real cannabis samples. The samples were also analyzed by means of an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatographic method currently used in the laboratory for the same objective. Finally, the results obtained with both analytical methods were compared to evaluate their accordance. The Bland-Altman method was applied as a statistical strategy to evaluate the degree of accordance between the results generated and display the data in a difference plot. The ultra-high performance supercritical fluid chromatography quantitative results were in accordance with the ultra-high performance liquid chromatography results, demonstrating the applicability of this technique for cannabinoid analysis.

This study investigated the impact of ComBat harmonization on the reproducibility of radiomic features extracted from magnetic resonance images (MRI) acquired on different scanners, using various data acquisition parameters and multiple image pre-processing techniques using a dedicated MRI phantom. Four scanners were used to acquire an MRI of a nonanatomic phantom as part of the TCIA RIDER database. In fast spin-echo inversion recovery (IR) sequences, several inversion durations were employed, including 50, 100, 250, 500, 750, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, and 3000 ms. In addition, a 3D fast spoiled gradient recalled echo (FSPGR) sequence was used to investigate several flip angles (FA): 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 degrees. Nineteen phantom compartments were manually segmented. Different approaches were used to pre-process each image: Bin discretization, Wavelet filter, Laplacian of Gaussian, logarithm, square, square root, and gradient. Overall, 92 first-, second-, and higher-order statistical radiomic features were extracted. ComBat harmonization was also applied to the extracted radiomic features. Finally, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Kruskal-Wallis\'s (KW) tests were implemented to assess the robustness of radiomic features. The number of non-significant features in the KW test ranged between 0-5 and 29-74 for various scanners, 31-91 and 37-92 for three times tests, 0-33 to 34-90 for FAs, and 3-68 to 65-89 for IRs before and after ComBat harmonization, with different image pre-processing techniques, respectively. The number of features with ICC over 90% ranged between 0-8 and 6-60 for various scanners, 11-75 and 17-80 for three times tests, 3-83 to 9-84 for FAs, and 3-49 to 3-63 for IRs before and after ComBat harmonization, with different image pre-processing techniques, respectively. The use of various scanners, IRs, and FAs has a great impact on radiomic features. However, the majority of scanner-robust features is also robust to IR and FA. Among the effective parameters in MR images, several tests in one scanner have a negligible impact on radiomic features. Different scanners and acquisition parameters using various image pre-processing might affect radiomic features to a large extent. ComBat harmonization might significantly impact the reproducibility of MRI radiomic features.

Synthesizing results across multiple studies is a popular way to increase the robustness of scientific findings. The most well-known method for doing this is meta-analysis. However, because meta-analysis requires conceptually comparable effect sizes with the same statistical form, meta-analysis may not be possible when studies are highly diverse in terms of their research design, participant characteristics, or operationalization of key variables. In these situations, Bayesian evidence synthesis may constitute a flexible and feasible alternative, as this method combines studies at the hypothesis level rather than at the level of the effect size. This method therefore poses less constraints on the studies to be combined. In this study, we introduce Bayesian evidence synthesis and show through simulations when this method diverges from what would be expected in a meta-analysis to help researchers correctly interpret the synthesis results. As an empirical demonstration, we also apply Bayesian evidence synthesis to a published meta-analysis on statistical learning in people with and without developmental language disorder. We highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed method and offer suggestions for future research.

In phase 2 clinical trials, we expect to make a right Go or No-Go decision during the interim analysis (IA) and make this decision at the right time. The optimal time for IA is usually determined based on a utility function. In most previous research, utility functions aim to minimize the expected sample size or total cost in confirmatory trials. However, the selected time can vary depending on different alternative hypotheses. This paper proposes a new utility function for Bayesian phase 2 exploratory clinical trials. It evaluates the predictability and robustness of the Go and No-Go decision made during the IA. We can make a robust time selection for the IA based on the function regardless of the treatment effect assumptions.

Organismal behavior, with its tremendous complexity and diversity, is generated by numerous physiological systems acting in coordination. Understanding how these systems evolve to support differences in behavior within and among species is a longstanding goal in biology that has captured the imagination of researchers who work on a multitude of taxa, including humans. Of particular importance are the physiological determinants of behavioral evolution, which are sometimes overlooked because we lack a robust conceptual framework to study mechanisms underlying adaptation and diversification of behavior. Here, we discuss a framework for such an analysis that applies a \"systems view\" to our understanding of behavioral control. This approach involves linking separate models that consider behavior and physiology as their own networks into a singular vertically integrated behavioral control system. In doing so, hormones commonly stand out as the links, or edges, among nodes within this system. To ground our discussion, we focus on studies of manakins (Pipridae), a family of Neotropical birds. These species have numerous physiological and endocrine specializations that support their elaborate reproductive displays. As a result, manakins provide a useful example to help imagine and visualize the way systems concepts can inform our appreciation of behavioral evolution. In particular, manakins help clarify how connectedness among physiological systems-which is maintained through endocrine signaling-potentiate and/or constrain the evolution of complex behavior to yield behavioral differences across taxa. Ultimately, we hope this review will continue to stimulate thought, discussion, and the emergence of research focused on integrated phenotypes in behavioral ecology and endocrinology.