{Reference Type}: Journal Article
{Title}: Bayesian evidence synthesis as a flexible alternative to meta-analysis: A simulation study and empirical demonstration.
{Author}: van Wonderen E;Zondervan-Zwijnenburg M;Klugkist I;
{Journal}: Behav Res Methods
{Volume}: 56
{Issue}: 4
{Year}: 2024 Apr 26
{Factor}: 5.953
{DOI}: 10.3758/s13428-024-02350-2
{Abstract}: Synthesizing results across multiple studies is a popular way to increase the robustness of scientific findings. The most well-known method for doing this is meta-analysis. However, because meta-analysis requires conceptually comparable effect sizes with the same statistical form, meta-analysis may not be possible when studies are highly diverse in terms of their research design, participant characteristics, or operationalization of key variables. In these situations, Bayesian evidence synthesis may constitute a flexible and feasible alternative, as this method combines studies at the hypothesis level rather than at the level of the effect size. This method therefore poses less constraints on the studies to be combined. In this study, we introduce Bayesian evidence synthesis and show through simulations when this method diverges from what would be expected in a meta-analysis to help researchers correctly interpret the synthesis results. As an empirical demonstration, we also apply Bayesian evidence synthesis to a published meta-analysis on statistical learning in people with and without developmental language disorder. We highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed method and offer suggestions for future research.