Preventive Health Services

预防性卫生服务
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:既往有妊娠相关心血管风险指标的女性,包括妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)和妊娠期高血压疾病(HDP),未来心血管疾病(CVD)的风险增加。尽管建议在产后早期开始进行CVD筛查和预防性护理,某些障碍限制了对此类服务的访问。我们计划对文献进行范围审查,以探索和总结有GDM和HDP病史的女性产后CVD预防服务的障碍和促进因素的证据。
    方法:此范围审查将根据Arksey和O'Malley\(2005)的方法框架和JoannaBriggs研究所指导进行系统范围审查,并将遵循政策和实践信息证据以及教育研究所的协调中心指南。审查结果将使用系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的荟萃分析扩展(PRISMA-ScR)清单进行报告。我们将搜索以下数据库:Medline,Embase和CINAHL。我们将对注册论文和论文进行灰色文献检索。纳入和排除标准将保持广泛。将包括以英语或法语发表的定性和定量研究,这些研究调查并报告了先前患有GDM和HDP的妇女对产后CVD筛查和预防性护理的障碍或促进者。个人,人际关系,组织,和系统级因素将被报告。定性结果将被叙述性地总结,定量结果将使用多源综合方法吸收到主题中。
    背景:这篇综述代表了渥太华健康科学网络研究伦理委员会(QI-184)审查的更大项目的一个目标。我们将通过开放获取出版物传播本次审查产生的知识,关于女性心血管健康的演讲/公共论坛,妇女心血管疾病预防论坛和社交媒体。我们还将在加拿大妇女心脏健康联盟的年会上介绍这项审查的结果。
    BACKGROUND: Women with previous pregnancy-related cardiovascular risk indicators, including gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), have an increased risk of future cardiovascular disease (CVD). Although CVD screening and preventive care beginning in the early postpartum period are recommended, certain barriers limit access to such services. We plan to conduct a scoping review of the literature to explore and summarise evidence on the barriers and facilitators of postpartum CVD preventive services in women with a history of GDM and HDP.
    METHODS: This scoping review will be conducted in line with the Arksey and O\'Malley\'s (2005) methodological framework and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for conducting a systematic scoping review and will follow the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and the Coordinating Centre at the Institute of Education guidelines. The review results will be reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. We will search the following databases: Medline, Embase and CINAHL. We will conduct grey literature searches for registered dissertations and theses. Inclusion and exclusion criteria will be kept broad. Qualitative and quantitative studies published in English or French that investigated and reported percieved barriers or facilitators to postpartum CVD screening and preventive care among women with previous GDM and HDP will be included. Individual, interpersonal, organizational, and system level factors will be reported. Qualitative findings will be summarised narratively, and quantitative findings will be absorbed within the themes using the multisource synthesis method.
    BACKGROUND: This review represents one objective of a larger project that was reviewed by the Ottawa Health Sciences Network Research Ethics Board (QI-184). We will disseminate knowledge emanating from this review through open-access publication, presentation/public forums on women\'s cardiovascular health, women\'s CVD prevention forums and social media. We will also present the findings of this review at the annual meeting of the Canadian Women\'s Heart Health Alliance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管进行了20年的癌症生存研究,政策,和宣传,美国的初级保健尚未将生存护理完全纳入其通才角色。该手稿描述了初级保健医生在生存护理中所采用的创新角色,以及这些角色是如何出现的。
    方法:我们对10名美国初级保健医生在生存护理领域的创新者的滚雪球样本进行了定性深入访谈。访谈被记录并专业转录。我们的团队每周都会在面试完成时开会,以审查成绩单并撰写摘要。我们使用浸渍结晶过程分析数据。
    结果:创新者没有接受正式的生存培训,而是通过经验和自我指导教育获得知识。所有在学术初级保健和/或癌症中心工作;背景强烈影响角色操作。我们沿着光谱描绘了4种主要角色类型,一端是初级保健通才取向,另一端是癌症通才取向。初级保健通才在定期访视期间应用生存指南(“GENERALISTS+”)或在临床受阻期间关注其他合并症中的癌症治疗效果(“肿瘤发生者”)。癌症通才专注于治疗期间和治疗后与癌症相关的后遗症;一些为幸存者提供连续性护理(“肿瘤发生者”),而其他人则将未满足的初级保健需求纳入生存咨询(“OCOgeneralists”)。
    结论:美国的学术初级保健和癌症中心正在发生初级保健创新。超越个人创新者的工作,需要系统的投资来支持采用这种创新。为了将幸存者护理更广泛地扩散到社区初级保健中,需要采取包括初级保健生存教育和劳动力发展在内的其他策略,以促进风险分层和共享护理模式.
    BACKGROUND: Despite 2 decades of cancer survivorship research, policy, and advocacy, primary care in the United States has not fully integrated survivorship care into its generalist role. This manuscript describes innovative roles primary care physicians have adopted in survivorship care and how these roles emerged.
    METHODS: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with a snowball sample of 10 US primary care physician innovators in survivorship care. Interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed. Our team met weekly as interviews were completed to review transcripts and write summaries. We analyzed data using an immersion-crystallization process.
    RESULTS: Innovators did not receive formal survivorship training but gained knowledge experientially and through self-guided education. All worked in academic primary care and/or cancer centers; context strongly influenced role operationalization. We delineated 4 major role-types along a spectrum, with primary care generalist orientations at one end and cancer generalist orientations at the other. Primary care generalists applied survivorship guidelines during regular visits (\"GENERALISTS+\") or focused on cancer treatment effects amid other comorbidities during blocked clinic time (\"oncoGENERALISTS\"). Cancer generalists focused on cancer-related sequalae during and after treatment; some provided continuity care to survivors (\"ONCOGENERALISTS\"), while others incorporated unmet primary care needs into survivorship consults (\"ONCOgeneralists\").
    CONCLUSIONS: Primary care survivorship innovations are occurring in academic primary care and cancer centers settings in the US. To move beyond the work of individual innovators, systematic investments are needed to support adoption of such innovations. For wider diffusion of survivorship care into community primary care, additional strategies that include primary care survivorship education and workforce development are needed to facilitate risk-stratified and shared-care models.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:内分泌干扰化学物质(EDC)干扰激素系统,可能导致新陈代谢,生殖,和神经问题,以及激素相关的癌症。在日常产品中发现,随着时间的推移,EDC在身体组织中积累,副作用取决于暴露的剂量和持续时间。本研究旨在探讨沙特公民与EDC暴露相关的行为,以评估进一步降低风险干预措施的必要性。
    方法:这项横断面研究采用了经过验证的,自我管理的在线问卷,以评估与EDC暴露相关的日常生活行为。共有563名参与者通过在线平台进行了方便的采样。
    结果:研究显示,绝大多数参与者年龄在18-25岁(48.67%,n=274)。平均而言,参与者对潜在的EDC暴露的得分最高为60,得分为32.78,分数从13到54分不等。多数(85.26%,n=480)属于中等潜在暴露类别,而少数(4.26%,n=24)根据他们报告的日常习惯表现出很高的潜在风险,主要是男性参与者(95.83%,n=23)。占绝大多数(72.65%,n=409)表明有可能改变生活方式以减少有害物质的暴露。
    结论:本研究揭示了沙特阿拉伯普通人群中与内分泌干扰物暴露相关的多种行为模式。有趣的是,参与者表现出积极的态度和改变危险行为的意愿。这些发现强调了旨在解决知识差距的教育计划和公共卫生运动的必要性。鼓励公众采取减少暴露的行为对于最大程度地减少EDC的潜在长期影响至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) interfere with hormonal systems, potentially causing metabolic, reproductive, and neurological issues, as well as hormone-related cancers. Found in everyday products, EDCs accumulate in body tissues over time, with adverse effects depending on the dose and duration of exposure. This study aims to explore behaviors related to EDC exposure among Saudi citizens to assess the need for further risk reduction interventions.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study employed a validated, self-administered online questionnaire to assess daily life behaviors associated with EDC exposure. A total of 563 participants were recruited using convenient sampling through online platforms.
    RESULTS: The study revealed that a significant majority of participants were aged 18-25 years (48.67%, n=274). On average, participants scored 32.78 out of a maximum of 60 for potential EDC exposure, with scores ranging from 13 to 54 points. The majority (85.26%, n=480) fell into the moderate potential exposure category, while a small minority (4.26%, n=24) exhibited high potential risk based on their reported daily habits, predominantly among male participants (95.83%, n=23). A significant majority (72.65%, n=409) indicated a likelihood of adopting lifestyle changes to reduce exposure to harmful substances.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals diverse behavioral patterns linked to endocrine disruptor exposure among the general population in Saudi Arabia. Interestingly, the participants showed a positive attitude and willingness to change their risky behaviors. These findings underscore the necessity for educational programs and public health campaigns aimed at addressing gaps in knowledge. Encouraging the public to adopt behaviors that reduce exposure is essential to minimizing the potential long-term effects of EDCs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    青年运动员人群中与棒球有关的伤害的患病率和严重程度继续升级,尽管卫生保健专业人员和体育组织努力平息这一趋势。本文回顾了当前的研究,这些研究调查了年轻棒球运动员最常见的伤害的危险因素和可能的预防策略。包括加强计划,音高计数指南,和投掷分析。
    The prevalence and severity of baseball-related injuries in the youth athlete population continue to escalate, despite efforts by health care professionals and sports organizations to quell this trend. This article reviews current research that has investigated the risk factors and possible prevention strategies for the most common injuries in young baseball players, including strengthening programs, pitch count guidelines, and throwing analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在COVID-19疫苗接种过程中,过去使用疫苗或不熟悉的环境的负面经历可能是压力的来源。我们检查了大规模疫苗接种中心和全科医生(GP)实践之间疫苗接种程序的感知压力是否不同。在10个GP实践(n=364)和两个疫苗中心(n=474)的新接种疫苗的个体中进行了调查(2021年7月10日至2021年10月)。所有地点的压力都很低。在年轻的参与者和全科医生的参与者中,手术的感知压力更高,并随着站点等待时间的延长而增加。随着程序的可理解性和对患者教育的满意度提高,压力降低。对COVID-19疫苗的健康风险表示更担忧的参与者认为疫苗接种程序压力更大。我们的研究结果表明,未来的疫苗接种运动有改善的机会,并强调了医疗保健提供者通过解决个人问题来缓解压力的重要作用。
    Negative past experiences with vaccines or unfamiliar environments can be sources of stress during the COVID-19 vaccination procedure. We examined whether the perceived stressfulness of the vaccination procedure differ between mass vaccination centers and general practitioner (GP) practices. A survey was distributed (07/2021-10/2021) among newly vaccinated individuals in ten GP practices (n = 364) and two vaccine centers (n = 474). Stress was low at all sites. The perceived stressfulness of the procedure was higher among younger participants and those in GP practices, and increased with longer waiting time at the site. Stress decreased with better comprehensibility of the procedure and higher satisfaction with patient education. Participants who expressed greater concern about the health risks of COVID-19 vaccines perceived the vaccination procedure as more stressful. Our findings indicate opportunities for improvements in future vaccination campaigns and highlight the important role of healthcare providers in mitigating stress by addressing individual concerns.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:公共长期护理保险(LTCI)系统可以促进平等和更广泛地获得优质的长期护理。然而,由于与人口老龄化相关的护理需求不断增长,确保财务可持续性具有挑战性。为了控制不断增长的需求,日本的公共LTCI系统为老年人的功能依赖提供了独特的基于家庭和社区的预防服务(即,成人日托,护理,家庭护理,功能筛选,功能训练,健康教育,和对社会活动的支持),遵循2006年至2015年分散交付的全国协议。然而,对这些服务效果的评估尚无定论。
    方法:我们使用2009-2014年日本474家本地公共保险公司的面板数据估算了本地预防服务的边际收益和技术效率,基于随机前沿分析。结果是观察到的年龄≥65岁的被证明接受中度护理的个体与预期数量的性别和年龄调整后的比率。较高的结果值表明每年每个地区中度功能依赖的人群风险较低。估计了作为解释变量的预防服务数量的边际收益,调整区域医疗和福利准入,护理需求和供应,和其他区域因素作为协变量。
    结果:预防服务(功能筛查除外)显着降低了中度功能依赖的人群风险。具体来说,成人日托每增加1%的平均结果变化,其他护理,家庭护理占0.13%,0.07%,和0.04%,分别。本地公共保险公司的技术效率中位数为0.94(四分位数范围:0.89-0.99)。
    结论:这些研究结果表明,以人口为基础的服务,按照标准化方案进行分散的本地操作,可以实现跨区域的有效预防。通过提出提供预防性福利的有用选择,这项研究可以为当前有关公共LTCI系统中福利覆盖范围的讨论提供信息。
    BACKGROUND: Public long-term care insurance (LTCI) systems can promote equal and wider access to quality long-term care. However, ensuring the financial sustainability is challenging owing to growing care demand related to population aging. To control growing demand, Japan\'s public LTCI system uniquely provided home- and community-based prevention services for functional dependency for older people (ie, adult day care, nursing care, home care, functional screening, functional training, health education, and support for social activities), following nationwide protocols with decentralized delivery from 2006 until 2015. However, evaluations of the effects of these services have been inconclusive.
    METHODS: We estimated the marginal gain and technical efficiency of local prevention services using 2009-2014 panel data for 474 local public insurers in Japan, based on stochastic frontier analysis. The outcome was the transformed sex-and age-adjusted ratio of the observed to expected number of individuals aged ≥65 years certified for moderate care. Higher outcome values indicate lower population risk of moderate functional dependency in each region in each year. The marginal gains of the provided quantities of prevention services as explanatory variables were estimated, adjusting for regional medical and welfare access, care demand and supply, and other regional factors as covariates.
    RESULTS: Prevention services (except functional screening) significantly reduced the population risk of moderate functional dependency. Specifically, the mean changes in outcome per 1% increase in adult day care, other nursing care, and home care were 0.13%, 0.07%, and 0.04%, respectively. The median technical efficiency of local public insurers was 0.94 (interquartile range: 0.89-0.99).
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that population-based services with decentralized local operation following standardized protocols could achieve efficient prevention across regions. This study could inform current discussions about the range of benefit coverage in public LTCI systems by presenting a useful option for the provision of preventive benefits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管全球疫苗接种信心正在下降,在这些情况下,低收入和中等收入国家关于影响常规疫苗接种行为的因素的详细信息很少.
    在2022年中期,我们调查了2017-2022年在肯尼亚分娩的人,并询问他们孩子的疫苗接种史以及疫苗接种的行为和社会驱动因素的假设相关性。
    在此示例中的873个孩子中,117人(13%)接种疫苗不足(即,延迟或丢失疫苗剂量)-和疫苗接种不足在COVID-19大流行期间(2020-2022年)的新生儿中更常见,而在大流行前(2017-2019年)。在多级多变量模型中,对疫苗的严重副作用表示担忧的受访者的孩子错过疫苗剂量的几率明显更高(aOR2.06,95%CI1.14-3.72),与COVID-19大流行之前相比,现在有更多的安全性问题之间存在很强的关联(aOR错过剂量4.44,95%CI1.71-11.51;aOR疫苗接种不足3.03,95%CI1.28-7.19)。对卫生工作者更信任的人有较低的孩子错过疫苗剂量的几率(aOR0.85,95%CI0.75-0.97)。报告以患者为中心的疫苗接种护理质量较高的人有孩子延迟或错过疫苗剂量的几率要低得多(aOR错过剂量0.14,95%CI0.04-0.58;aOR疫苗接种不足0.27,95%CI0.10-0.79)。
    这些发现突出了提高疫苗覆盖率的潜在策略:更加注重以患者为中心的护理质量,培训医护人员如何解决疫苗的安全问题,建立对卫生保健系统和卫生工作者的信任。
    UNASSIGNED: Although vaccination confidence is declining globally, there is little detailed information from low- and middle-income countries about factors influencing routine vaccination behavior in these contexts.
    UNASSIGNED: In mid-2022, we surveyed people who gave birth in Kenya between 2017-2022, and asked them about their children\'s vaccination history and about hypothesized correlates of vaccination per the Behavioural and Social Drivers of Vaccination model.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 873 children in this sample, 117 (13%) were under-vaccinated (i.e., delayed or missing vaccine dose(s)) - and under-vaccination was more common among births during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2022) versus pre-pandemic (2017-2019). In multi-level multivariable models, children of respondents who expressed concerns about serious side effects from vaccines had significantly higher odds of missed vaccine dose(s) (aOR 2.06, 95 % CI 1.14-3.72), and there was a strong association between having more safety concerns now versus before the COVID-19 pandemic (aOR missed dose(s) 4.44, 95 % CI 1.71-11.51; aOR under-vaccination 3.03, 95 % CI 1.28-7.19). People with greater trust in health workers had lower odds of having a child with missed vaccine dose(s) (aOR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.75-0.97). People who reported higher patient-centered quality of vaccination care had much lower odds of having children with delayed or missed vaccine dose(s) (aOR missed dose(s) 0.14, 95 % CI 0.04-0.58; aOR under-vaccination 0.27, 95 % CI 0.10-0.79).
    UNASSIGNED: These findings highlight potential strategies to improve vaccine coverage: greater focus on patient-centered quality of care, training healthcare workers on how to address safety concerns about vaccines, and building trust in the health care system and in health workers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述农村患者获得医疗保健的旅行时间对他们报告的预防性医疗保健服务利用和个人健康结果的影响。
    从2021年2月至8月收集了来自美国东北部50岁以上农村成年人的在线调查数据。研究措施包括自我报告的旅行时间以获得医疗保健,使用预防性医疗保健,和健康结果。使用线性评估旅行时间与使用预防性护理和健康结果之间的关联,Poisson,和控制人口统计学变量的逻辑回归分析。
    我们的研究人群包括1052名农村成年人,平均旅行时间为18.5分钟(范围:0-60)。种族/族裔少数参与者和高收入参与者的旅行时间更长(均P<0.05),但这与预防性医疗保健的使用无关。更长的旅行时间与更差的心理健康和更多的合并症有关,包括癌症和糖尿病(所有P<0.05)。
    旅行时间因患者人口统计因素而异,它与心理健康和合并症有关。旅行时间和预防性护理之间没有关联,这表明其他障碍可能导致农村社区对这些服务的使用欠佳。需要进一步的研究来阐明将旅行时间与农村社区内的心理健康和合并症联系起来的因果途径,因为增加旅行可能会加剧壁内健康差异。
    UNASSIGNED: To characterize the impact of rural patients\' travel time to obtain healthcare on their reported utilization of preventive healthcare services and personal health outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Online survey data from rural adults ages 50+ years living in the Northeastern United States were collected from February to August 2021. Study measures included self-reported travel time to obtain healthcare, use of preventive healthcare, and health outcomes. The associations between travel time with use of preventive care and health outcomes were assessed using linear, Poisson, and logistic regression analyses controlling for demographic variables.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study population included 1052 rural adults, with a mean travel time of 18.5 min (range: 0-60). Travel time was greater for racial/ethnic minority participants and for higher-income participants (both P < .05), but it was not associated with use of preventive healthcare. Greater travel time was associated with poorer mental health and more comorbidities, including cancer and diabetes (all P < .05).
    UNASSIGNED: Travel time varied by patient demographic factors, and it was associated with mental health and comorbidities. There was no association between travel time and preventive care use, suggesting that other barriers likely contribute to suboptimal use of these services within rural communities. Further research is needed to elucidate the causal pathways linking travel time to mental health and comorbidities within rural communities, as increased travel may exacerbate intrarural health disparities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    BACKGROUND: In the areas of prevention and health promotion, there is a large number of measures for children and adolescents. One way of facilitating evidence-based action for those involved in these taks is by making available online evidence registers with customised, effectiveness-tested measures. The Green List Prevention is such a register and offers an overview of evidence-based programmes in Germany, currently with a focus on psychosocial health.
    OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were (a) to analyse the characteristics of the available and evaluated programmes on the psychosocial health of children and adolescents, (b) to identify priorities and underrepresented areas of the Green List Prevention and (c) to optimise the search functions of the register.
    METHODS: The characteristic features were recorded on the basis of the existing upper categories of the register entries which were differentiated into subcategories in an inductive procedure by at least two persons. In addition, deductive categories were added for relevant aspects concerning content and implementation. The upper and lower categories formed were operationalized with characteristic values. All entries were analyzed by using a data sheet and were descriptively evaluated.
    RESULTS: The 102 programmes listed (as of 2/2024) addressed not only the primary target group of children and youth, but also secondary target groups (mainly teachers and guardians). Social and life skills programmes as well as trainings for guardians represented a focus. Behavioral prevention programmes on the topics of violence (including bullying) (63.7%), addiction (46.1%) and/or mental health (35.3%) were frequently represented, whereas nutrition and/or physical activity (4.9%) were hardly represented. Most of the programmes (88.2%) could be assigned to the eligibility criteria of the statutory health insurers (§20a SGB V). Potentials digital implementation forms and further implementation aspects were identified.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Green List Prevention bundles a large number of different measures and that there is potential for expansion. Processing knowledge about effective measures in a user-friendly manner can be optimised through expanded search functions, so that resource-conserving, evidence-based action can be facilitated.
    UNASSIGNED: In der Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung existiert eine Vielzahl an Maßnahmen für Kinder und Jugendliche. Eine Möglichkeit, den Akteur*innen evidenzbasiertes Handeln in der Praxis zu erleichtern, sind online verfügbare Evidenzregister mit passgenauen wirksamkeitsgeprüften Maßnahmen. Die Grüne Liste Prävention ist ein solches Register und bietet eine Übersicht zu wirksamkeitsgeprüften Programmen in Deutschland, aktuell mit dem Fokus auf psychosoziale Gesundheit. ZIEL: Ziel ist es, (a) die Charakteristika der verfügbaren und evaluierten Programme zur psychosozialen Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen zu analysieren, (b) Schwerpunkte und unterrepräsentierte Bereiche der Grünen Liste Prävention zu identifizieren und (c) die Suchfunktionen des Registers zu optimieren.
    METHODS: Die Erfassung der charakteristischen Merkmale erfolgte anhand der vorhandenen Oberkategorien der Registereinträge, diese wurden von mindestens zwei Personen in einem induktiven Verfahren in Unterkategorien ausdifferenziert. Darüber hinaus wurden deduktiv Kategorien zu inhaltlichen und umsetzungsrelevanten Aspekten ergänzt. Die gebildeten Ober- und Unterkategorien wurden mittels spezifischer Merkmalsausprägungen operationalisiert. Anhand eines Erhebungsbogens wurden alle Einträge analysiert und deskriptiv ausgewertet.
    UNASSIGNED: Die 102 gelisteten Programme (Stand: 2/2024) adressieren nicht nur die primäre Zielgruppe der Kinder und Jugendlichen, sondern auch sekundäre Zielgruppen (vor allem Lehrkräfte und Erziehungsberechtigte). Einen Schwerpunkt bilden Sozial- und Lebenskompetenzprogramme sowie Schulungen für Erziehungsberechtigte. Verhaltenspräventive Programme zu den Themen Gewalt (inkl. Mobbing) (63,7%), Sucht (46,1%) und/oder psychische Gesundheit (35,3%) sind häufig vertreten, während Ernährung und/oder Bewegung (4,9%) kaum repräsentiert sind. Die meisten Programme (88,2%) lassen sich den Förderkriterien der gesetzlichen Krankenkassen (§20a SGB V) zuordnen. Potenziale zu digitalen Umsetzungsformen und weiteren Umsetzungsaspekten wurden identifiziert.
    UNASSIGNED: Deutlich wird, dass die Grüne Liste Prävention eine Vielzahl von unterschiedlichen Maßnahmen bündelt und Potenziale zur Erweiterung bestehen. Die anwendungsfreundliche Aufbereitung von Wissen über wirksame Maßnahmen kann durch erweiterte Suchfunktionen optimiert werden, sodass ressourcenschonendes, evidenzbasiertes Handeln gestärkt wird.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究确定了企业健康计划(CWP)对菲律宾工人身体的影响,职业,社会情感,知识分子,和精神健康。
    这项研究调查了CWP的组成部分,它的交流形式,受访者的参与程度,动机,和他们的身体,职业,社会情感,知识分子,和精神健康来确定他们在大流行期间的健康状况。该研究利用在线调查来检查与此类计划的有效性相关的问题,描述性统计,相关分析,以评估受访者的社会人口统计概况,和点双材料相关性来测试CWP与其健康状态的关联。
    研究表明,90%的受访者参与了他们组织的CWP,与大多数研究认为州CWP的参与率低相矛盾。CWP倡议大多通过电子邮件公布,印在备忘录中,然后张贴在公告板上,并通过公司网站和社交媒体分享。此外,研究表明,意识到自己的健康计划的员工的总体健康平均得分高于那些没有参与健康计划的员工,并且参与相对于未参与的员工。
    该研究的六个假设显示出积极的结果,表明CWP有利于改善员工的整体健康。然而,基于点双线相关性,每个范式和总体健康评分与参与和意识状态弱相关.在研究中没有记录到不良反应。此外,研究发现,员工积极参与个人健康计划,导致他们的健康维度得分很高。该研究显示了不同的个人健康举措,这意味着员工也对他们的总体福祉持积极态度。
    UNASSIGNED: The study determined the effects of corporate wellness programs (CWP) on Filipino workers\' physical, occupational, socio-emotional, intellectual, and spiritual wellness.
    UNASSIGNED: The study looked into the components of a CWP, its forms of communication, the respondents\' level of participation, motivation, and their physical, occupational, socio-emotional, intellectual, and spiritual well-being to determine their wellness status during the pandemic. The study utilized an online survey to examine questions related to the efficacy of such programs, descriptive statistics, correlation analysis to assess the respondents\' socio-demographic profiles, and point biserial correlation to test the association of CWP to their wellness status.
    UNASSIGNED: The research showed that 90% of the respondents participated in their organization\'s CWP, contradicting most studies that state CWP suffers from a low participation rate. CWP initiatives are mostly publicized through electronic mail, printed in memos, then posted on the bulletin board, and shared through the company website and social media. In addition, the study showed that overall wellness mean scores were higher in employees who were aware of their wellness programs than those who were not and in participating vis-à-vis non-participating employees.
    UNASSIGNED: The study\'s six assumptions showed positive results, indicating that CWPs are beneficial in improving employees\' overall wellness. However, the per paradigm and overall wellness scores were weakly associated with participation and awareness status based on the point biserial correlation. No adverse effects were recorded in the study. In addition, the study discovered that employees were active in personal wellness initiatives, leading to high scores in their wellness dimensions. The study showed different individual wellness initiatives implying that employees were also proactive about their total well-being.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号