Population Groups

人口群体
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前澳大利亚尚无预防糖尿病相关足部溃疡(DFU)的指南。一个国家专家小组旨在系统地确定和调整适当的国际准则以适应澳大利亚的情况,以创建新的澳大利亚循证指南,以预防首次和/或反复出现的DFU。这些准则将首次考虑农村和偏远地区,原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民。
    方法:遵循国家卫生和医学研究委员会的程序,以使有关DFU预防的国际指南适应澳大利亚的健康状况。这包括对公共数据库的搜索,此后,国际糖尿病足工作组(IWGDF)预防指南被认为是最合适的适应。使用ADAPTE和GDE系统评估了IWGDF的16项预防建议,以决定是否应采用这些建议,适应或排除新的澳大利亚指南。参考澳大利亚的情况,重新评估了证据的质量和推荐等级的强度。该指南经过了公众咨询,进一步修订,并获得国家高峰机构的批准。
    结果:在IWGDF的16项原始预防建议中,九人被收养,6人被改编,1人被排除。建议以与IWGDF风险等级相对应的间隔评估所有DFU风险增加的人。对于那些风险增加的人,关于适当的足部保护的结构化教育,检查,鞋类,承重活动,和足部自我保健建议。矫形干预和/或医疗级鞋类的处方,提供综合足部护理,和足部皮肤温度的自我监测(视经过验证的情况而定,在澳大利亚可用的用户友好且负担得起的系统)也可能有助于防止DFU。如果上述推荐的非手术治疗失败,可以考虑使用各种手术干预措施来预防DFU.
    结论:这一新的澳大利亚基于证据的DFU预防指南,得到10个国家高峰机构的认可,为澳大利亚相关卫生专业人员和消费者提供预防DFU的具体建议。遵循这些建议,应在澳大利亚取得更好的DFU预防成果。
    BACKGROUND: There are no current Australian guidelines on the prevention of diabetes-related foot ulceration (DFU). A national expert panel aimed to systematically identify and adapt suitable international guidelines to the Australian context to create new Australian evidence-based guidelines on prevention of first-ever and/or recurrent DFU. These guidelines will include for the first-time considerations for rural and remote, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
    METHODS: The National Health and Medical Research Council procedures were followed to adapt suitable international guidelines on DFU prevention to the Australian health context. This included a search of public databases after which the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) prevention guideline was deemed the most appropriate for adaptation. The 16 IWGDF prevention recommendations were assessed using the ADAPTE and GRADE systems to decide if they should be adopted, adapted or excluded for the new Australian guideline. The quality of evidence and strength of recommendation ratings were re-evaluated with reference to the Australian context. This guideline underwent public consultation, further revision, and approval by national peak bodies.
    RESULTS: Of the 16 original IWGDF prevention recommendations, nine were adopted, six were adapted and one was excluded. It is recommended that all people at increased risk of DFU are assessed at intervals corresponding to the IWGDF risk ratings. For those at increased risk, structured education about appropriate foot protection, inspection, footwear, weight-bearing activities, and foot self-care is recommended. Prescription of orthotic interventions and/or medical grade footwear, providing integrated foot care, and self-monitoring of foot skin temperatures (contingent on validated, user-friendly and affordable systems becoming available in Australia) may also assist in preventing DFU. If the above recommended non-surgical treatment fails, the use of various surgical interventions for the prevention of DFU can be considered.
    CONCLUSIONS: This new Australian evidence-based guideline on prevention of DFU, endorsed by 10 national peak bodies, provides specific recommendations for relevant health professionals and consumers in the Australian context to prevent DFU. Following these recommendations should achieve better DFU prevention outcomes in Australia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    语言学的人类学,食物,和营养科学在对危地马拉食品指南(GFG)进行批判性审视方面具有关键作用。这些GFG被传达给土著社区,以解释他们的饮食模式以及在文化背景下对这些食物组的结构认知解释。我们对食物的理解是由语言所代表的认知结构决定的。由于食物是人类文化认同的基础,从玛雅土著群体的角度理解食物和食物类别应该是健康的基本支柱,食物,和营养。这项研究的目的是探索GFG,并根据认知结构的相似性和差异将它们与食物组的K'iche'理解进行比较。这项研究是通过半结构化访谈和参与者观察在Nahualá(西危地马拉)的K\'iche\'玛雅家庭中进行的,以比较和对比在K\'iche\'食物组上收集的数据和相应的认知结构与先前在GFG上发表的发现。这些发现通过实地调查得到了证实,尽管子类别的一些细微差别已经改变,并且对2种食物组施加了显着的压力:wa(玉米基食物)和ri\'kil(非玉米基食物)。研究得出的结论是,通过K\'iche\'语言传达的食物组及其使用的认知结构和理解与等级显着不同,通过GFG传达的食品组技术描述。为了加强食物和营养的公共卫生方法,土著知识必须得到尊重,学会了,并集成到GFG中。
    The anthropology of linguistics, food, and nutrition sciences has a key role with regard to taking a critical look at the Guatemalan Food Guidelines (GFG). These GFG are communicated to native communities to interpret their eating patterns and the structural cognitive interpretation of these food groups in a cultural context. Our understanding of food is informed by cognitive structure represented by language. Since food is fundamental in human cultural identities, understanding food and food categories from the perspective of Mayan indigenous groups should be a fundamental pillar of health, food, and nutrition. The purpose of this research was to explore the GFG and compare them to K\'iche\' understandings of food groups in terms of cognitive structural similarities and differences. The research was carried out in the field by way of semi-structured interviews and participant observation among K\'iche\' Mayan families in Nahualá (Western Guatemala) to compare and contrast data collected on K\'iche\' food groups and corresponding cognitive structure with previously published findings on the GFG. These findings were confirmed through fieldwork, though some of the nuances of subcategories have changed, and significant stress was placed on 2 food groups: wa (corn-based food) and ri\'kil (non-corn-based food). The research concludes that the cognitive structure and understanding of food groups and their uses communicated through K\'iche\' language differ significantly from the hierarchical, technical description of food groups communicated through the GFG. In order to strengthen public health approaches to food and nutrition, indigenous knowledge must be respected, learned, and integrated into GFG.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Randomized controlled trials demonstrate that timely introduction of peanut to infants reduces the risk of peanut allergy. However, much debate remains regarding how to best achieve earlier peanut introduction at the population level. Our previous study in 2007-2011 (HealthNuts, n = 5300) indicated that few infants were consuming peanut in the first year. Australian infant feeding guidelines were updated in 2016 to recommend introducing peanut before 12 months for all infants. There were no data available on the subsequent effect on peanut introduction or peanut reactions.
    We sought to assess the consequences of a nonscreening approach to allergenic food introduction in a population-based sample of infants in their first year of life.
    EarlyNuts is a population-based, cross-sectional study of 12-month-old infants in Melbourne, Australia, recruited by using an identical sampling frame and methods to HealthNuts (72% response rate vs 73% response rate in HealthNuts). We report here on the first 860 participants recruited between November 2016 and October 2018.
    Most infants (88.6%; 95% CI, 86.1% to 90.7%) had introduced peanut by 12 months (median age, 6 months), an increase from 28.4% (95% CI, 27.2% to 29.7%) in the HealthNuts study. By 12 months, the majority of these (76.4%) had consumed peanut more than 4 times, and 28% were eating peanut more than once per week. Preliminary results on parent-reported reactions show that 4.0% of those consuming peanut by 12 months had possible IgE-mediated reactions.
    There has been a striking shift toward earlier peanut introduction, with a 3-fold increase in peanut introduction by age 1 year in 2018 compared with 2007-2011.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定土著和非土著澳大利亚糖尿病患者是否遵守NHMRC眼科检查指南。
    方法:使用多阶段的横断面调查,随机整群抽样。
    方法:在澳大利亚大陆五个州和北领地随机选择的30个地理位置,由偏远分层。
    方法:在2015年3月至2016年4月期间,根据标准化方案,招募并检查了1738名40-92岁的澳大利亚原住民和3098名50-98岁的非土著澳大利亚人。
    方法:NHMRC眼科检查指南的坚持率;影响坚持的因素。
    结果:非土著澳大利亚人(两年一次筛查;77.5%)对筛查建议的依从性明显高于土著澳大利亚人(每年一次筛查;52.7%;P<0.001)。非土著澳大利亚人的更高依从性与糖尿病持续时间更长有关(调整后的优势比[aOR],每5年1.19;P=0.018),虽然年龄的增长与非土著澳大利亚人的依从性较差(aOR,每十年0.70;P=0.011)。对于澳大利亚原住民来说,居住在内部区域(AOR,1.66;P=0.007),男性(aOR,1.46;P=0.018)是与依从性呈正相关的显著因素。
    结论:超过四分之三的非土著澳大利亚糖尿病患者和超过一半的土著澳大利亚糖尿病患者遵守NHMRC眼科检查指南。依从率之间的差异可能表明土著社区在提供或接受筛查服务方面存在差距,或者缺乏对准则的认识。需要精心整合的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查服务,特别是在偏远地区,提高依从率。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine adherence to NHMRC eye examination guidelines for Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian people with diabetes.
    METHODS: Cross-sectional survey using multistage, random cluster sampling.
    METHODS: Thirty randomly selected geographic sites in the five mainland Australian states and the Northern Territory, stratified by remoteness.
    METHODS: 1738 Indigenous Australians aged 40-92 years and 3098 non-Indigenous Australians aged 50-98 years were recruited and examined between March 2015 and April 2016 according to a standardised protocol that included a questionnaire (administered by an interviewer) and a series of standard eye tests.
    METHODS: Adherence rates to NHMRC eye examination guidelines; factors influencing adherence.
    RESULTS: Adherence to screening recommendations was significantly greater among non-Indigenous Australians (biennial screening; 77.5%) than Indigenous Australians (annual screening; 52.7%; P < 0.001). Greater adherence by non-Indigenous Australians was associated with longer duration of diabetes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.19 per 5 years; P = 0.018), while increasing age was associated with poorer adherence in non-Indigenous Australians (aOR, 0.70 per decade; P = 0.011). For Indigenous Australians, residing in inner regional areas (aOR, 1.66; P = 0.007) and being male (aOR, 1.46; P = 0.018) were significant factors positively associated with adherence.
    CONCLUSIONS: More than three-quarters of non-Indigenous Australians with diabetes and more than half of Indigenous Australians with diabetes adhere to the NHMRC eye examination guidelines. The discrepancy between the adherence rates may point to gaps in the provision or uptake of screening services in Indigenous communities, or a lack of awareness of the guidelines. A carefully integrated diabetic retinopathy screening service is needed, particularly in remote areas, to improve adherence rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于认识到需要改善环极和土著环境的卫生系统,有人呼吁将研究议程扩展到影响健康的所有部门,并通过研究过程承认学术和土著知识。尽管在国际论坛和土著群体中被认为是独特的知识体系,在学术文献或关于卫生系统的同行评审文献中,没有很好地记录基于土著知识的方法和理论的例子。本文介绍了一种基于共识的方法,由经验丰富的研究人员和土著知识持有者组成的混合方法,他们合作进行了一项研究,探讨了卫生系统管理的土著价值观。该方法建立在Etuaptmumk或双眼观察的原理上,旨在应对和解决土著知识方式与科学调查之间的内在冲突,后者为医疗保健的证据基础提供了信息。混合方法框架似乎提供了一个适合于需要来自本地知识来源和西方知识的数据的研究问题的框架。名义共识法,作为西方范式,被发现对土著知识的嵌入作出反应,并允许空间表达多种观点并就手头的问题达成共识。需要进一步利用和严格评估这种具有土著知识的混合方法。
    With the recognized need for health systems\' improvements in the circumpolar and indigenous context, there has been a call to expand the research agenda across all sectors influencing wellness and to recognize academic and indigenous knowledge through the research process. Despite being recognized as a distinct body of knowledge in international forums and across indigenous groups, examples of methods and theories based on indigenous knowledge are not well documented in academic texts or peer-reviewed literature on health systems. This paper describes the use of a consensus-based, mixed method with indigenous knowledge by an experienced group of researchers and indigenous knowledge holders who collaborated on a study that explored indigenous values underlying health systems stewardship. The method is built on the principles of Etuaptmumk or two-eyed seeing, which aim to respond to and resolve the inherent conflicts between indigenous ways of knowing and the scientific inquiry that informs the evidence base in health care. Mixed methods\' frameworks appear to provide a framing suitable for research questions that require data from indigenous knowledge sources and western knowledge. The nominal consensus method, as a western paradigm, was found to be responsive to embedding of indigenous knowledge and allowed space to express multiple perspectives and reach consensus on the question at hand. Further utilization and critical evaluation of this mixed methodology with indigenous knowledge are required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:近几十年来,许多土著社区,世界各地的政策制定者和研究人员批评学术界没有意识到这些社区在研究方面面临的具体挑战。土著社区数十年来的讨论的结果之一是许多西方国家制定了对本土敏感的伦理研究准则。1997年,挪威萨米人议会(SP)达成一致决定,必须制定萨米人研究的道德准则。然而,这些准则仍有待制定。
    目的:本文的目的是调查挪威SP\1997年的决定发生了什么,并思考为什么这个问题似乎已经从SP\的议程中消失了。最后,我们考虑研究伦理是否仅是研究界的主题。
    方法:对与研究伦理有关的研究和SP文件的议会白皮书的审查。
    结果:对1997年SP的决定的回应发生在两个不同的渠道,他们都是国家的,即研究伦理渠道和政治渠道。因此,实际上发生了两个平行的过程。尽管近二十年的报道,土著社区参与研究的概念仍然不是挪威道德准则的组成部分。
    结论:本土化敏感的研究伦理问题似乎已经从SP的议程中消失了,关于萨米人研究的研究伦理审查系统也有一些小的调整,就像SP要求修订时一样。
    BACKGROUND: In recent decades many indigenous communities, policy makers and researchers worldwide have criticized the academic community for not being aware of the specific challenges these communities have faced and still are facing with regard to research. One result of the decades of discourse in indigenous communities is the development in many Western countries of indigenously sensitive ethical research guidelines. In 1997 the Sami Parliament (SP) in Norway reached a unanimous decision that ethical guidelines for Sami research had to be drawn up. Such guidelines are however still to be created.
    OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this article are to enquire into what happened to the Norwegian SP\'s decision of 1997 and to reflect on why the issue seems to have disappeared from the SP\'s agenda. Finally, we consider whether research ethics is to be a subject for the research community only.
    METHODS: A review of parliamentary white papers on research and SP documents relating to research ethics.
    RESULTS: The response to the SP\'s decision in 1997 took place in two different channels, both of them national, namely the research ethics channel and the political channel. Thus, there were actually two parallel processes taking place. In spite of nearly two decades of reports, the concept of the participation of indigenous communities in research is still not an integral part of Norwegian ethical guidelines.
    CONCLUSIONS: The issue of indigenously sensitive research ethics seems to have disappeared from the SP\'s agenda and the research ethics review system with regard to Sami research is with minor adjustments the same as when the SP asked for a revision.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项研究中,通过应用文化共识模型分析,在高中高年级学生及其父母和老师中探索了“美好生活”的建构。共有469名学生,来自克罗地亚四个城市的474名家长和158名教师参加了这项研究。这是在2011/2012进行。在研究的第一阶段,通过访谈和自由列名收集的信息用于创建一组结构化的问卷调查问题,作为第二阶段数据收集的调查的一部分。结果报告在两个美好生活子领域:“健康与福祉”和“移民与社会经济环境”。结果表明样本组的异质性,文化价值观的不完全代际传递,以及两个子群体的例子,它们抵制文化规范,不符合占主导地位的“能力即共享”范式。证明了基于emic方法和本地重要现象测试文化共识模型的价值,对于计划和进行整体人类学研究。
    In this study the construct of a \'good life\' was explored among upper secondary school senior pupils and their parents and teachers by applying cultural consensus model analysis. A total of 469 students, 474 parents and 158 teachers from four Croatian cities participated in the study, which was conducted in 2011/2012. The information collected through interviewing and free-listing during the first phase of the study was used to create a set of structured questionnaire questions as a part of the survey in the second phase of data collection. The results are reported on two good-life sub-domains: \'health & well-being\' and \'migration & socioeconomic milieu\'. The results indicate heterogeneity of the sample groups, incomplete inter-generational transmission of cultural values and examples of two sub-groups that resist cultural norms and do not comply with the dominant \'competence-as-sharing\' paradigm. The value of testing the cultural consensus model based on the emic approach and locally significant phenomena is demonstrated for planning and conducting holistic anthropological research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们调查了与权威和社区相关的概念的心内共识和情感意义的变化,人类社会性的两种基本形式。来自德国社会不同社会经济地位(SES)群体的调查参与者(n=2,849)沿着情感意义的三个基本维度对909个社会概念进行了评级。结果表明,社会内部对这些含义的广泛共识,并表明根据概念的情感相似性组织概念会产生有意义的社会共享知识结构。共识发现进一步被SES差异上细微的系统变化的证据所限定。关于情感上中立的词,高地位的人认为亲密相关和社会期望的概念不如中等或低地位的人积极和有力,同时认为反社会概念相对更具威胁性。SES群体之间的这种系统性差异表明,社会性的情感意义在某种程度上是社会分层的功能。
    We investigate intrasocietal consensus and variation in affective meanings of concepts related to authority and community, two elementary forms of human sociality. Survey participants (n = 2,849) from different socioeconomic status (SES) groups in German society provided ratings of 909 social concepts along three basic dimensions of affective meaning. Results show widespread consensus on these meanings within society and demonstrate that a meaningful structure of socially shared knowledge emerges from organizing concepts according to their affective similarity. The consensus finding is further qualified by evidence for subtle systematic variation along SES differences. In relation to affectively neutral words, high-status individuals evaluate intimacy-related and socially desirable concepts as less positive and powerful than middle- or low-status individuals, while perceiving antisocial concepts as relatively more threatening. This systematic variation across SES groups suggests that the affective meaning of sociality is to some degree a function of social stratification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号