Visual assessment, while the primary method for pigmentation and erythema evaluation in clinical practice, is subjective, time-consuming, and may lead to variability in observations among clinicians. Objective and quantitative techniques are required for a precise evaluation of the disease\'s severity and the treatment\'s efficacy. This research examines the precision and utility of a newly developed skin imaging system in assessing pigmentation and erythema. Sixty participants were recruited, and their facial images were analyzed with the new OBSERV 520 x skin imaging system, compared to DERMACATCH for regional analysis and VISIA for full-face examination. The degree of skin pigmentation was clinically graded using the MASI scores evaluated by dermatologists. The data revealed positive correlations between the novel skin imaging system and the two conventional instruments in quantifying pigmentation and erythema, whether in regional or full-face analysis. Furthermore, the new skin imaging system positively correlated with the clinical MASI scores (r = 0.4314, P < 0.01). In contrast, our study found no significant correlation between the traditional system and clinical assessment, indicating a more substantial capacity for hyperpigmentation assessment in the new system. Our study validates the innovative skin imaging system\'s accuracy in evaluating pigmentation and erythema, demonstrating its feasibility for quantitative evaluation in both clinical and research purposes.

BACKGROUND Pigmented purpuric dermatosis (PPD) is a rare disease that is poorly understood but thought to result from inflammation of the capillaries causing extravasation of erythrocytes into the soft tissue. There are a variety of potential causes, including medications, such as acetaminophen and aspirin, abnormal humoral immunity, and excessive exercise. Although benign, PPD can be bothersome to patients due to associated pruritus, weeping, and poor cosmetic results. Treatment of this lesion is difficult, with no standardized regimen and a tendency for relapse once treatment is discontinued. CASE REPORT This case reports on a 77-year-old man who presented to an outpatient dermatology clinic with bilateral lower extremity edema with associated weeping and erythema for 1 year. A biopsy was conducted and resulted as PPD. He began treatment with excimer laser therapy after conservative and topical treatment options failed, with resolution of symptoms without recurrence for approximately 1 year. CONCLUSIONS PPD is notoriously difficult to treat, and historic treatment options include topical corticosteroids, oral supplements, and immunomodulators, all of which come with a range of adverse effects. However, new literature supports the use of phototherapy to treat PPD, with varying results. Previously implemented options include but are not limited to phototherapy with psoralen plus ultraviolet A, narrow band ultraviolet B, advanced fluorescence technology pulsed light, and fractional non-ablative 1540-nm erbium: glass laser, each with varying degrees of success. This case discusses the successful treatment of recalcitrant PPD with excimer laser therapy and maintenance of remission for approximately 1 year.

BACKGROUND: Clobetasol has demonstrated remarkable results in treating melasma within a short time frame; however, its use is limited because of the risk of local side effects. To date, there is no controlled trial on sequential clobetasol/hydroquinone for melasma. This study aimed to investigate the tolerability and efficacy of 0.05% clobetasol followed by 4% hydroquinone (CLOB-HQ) in comparison to the isolated use of 4% hydroquinone (HQ).
METHODS: A double-blinded, randomized clinical trial involving 50 women with facial melasma was performed. They were directed to apply 0.05% clobetasol every night for 14 days, followed by 4% hydroquinone for 46 days (CLOB-HQ group), or the use of hydroquinone for 60 days (HQ group). Evaluations were carried out at inclusion, and after 14 and 60 days of treatment, measuring modified Melasma Area and Severity Index (mMASI), Melasma Quality of Life scale (MELASQoL), and colorimetry. The Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) was assessed by a blinded evaluator.
RESULTS: There was no difference in the main outcomes at D14 and D60 (P > 0.1). For CLOB-HQ, the mean (CI 95%) reduction in mMASI was 13.2% (5.1-21.3%) and 43.1% (32.2-54.0%) at D14 and D60, and for HQ, they were 10.6% (5.9-27.5%) and 44.8% (33.2-52.3%). The MELASQoL, colorimetric luminosity, and GAIS showed a progressive improvement for both groups despite no difference between them. No severe side effects were identified. No cases of telangiectasias, atrophy, or perioral dermatitis were associated with the use of CLOB.
CONCLUSIONS: The sequential CLOB-HQ regimen was safe and well tolerated, even though its efficacy was not different from HQ after 14 or 60 days of treatment. Based on these findings, the use of clobetasol 14 days before hydroquinone is not advisable for the treatment of melasma.

BACKGROUND: Dyschromia can be associated with increased production and/or reduced clearance of pigmentation in the skin. Multiple pathways are involved in causality. A novel topical product was recently developed, which contains actives that have been validated through in-vitro and clinical studies to counteract pigmentation related to photodamage, PIH, and melasma. This study further evaluates the safety and efficacy of this product for facial dyschromia during an additional 3-month extension period following the completion of the previous 12-week multi-center trial.  Study Design: Subjects from the previous multi-center trial with mild to severe facial dyschromia at baseline were eligible to participate in this 3-month extension study upon completion of that trial. This extension study evaluated the continued use of the novel topical product with PATH-3 Technology (Alastin Skincare, Carlsbad, CA) over a 3-month period. Subjects who were previously randomized to the novel topical product continued using it and for those previously randomized to hydroquinone 4% discontinued its use. Both cohorts continued daily sunscreen use. Blinded investigators assessed subjects at follow-up visits at 16, 20, and 24 weeks.
RESULTS: Twenty-six (26) subjects completed the extension phase of the pivotal trial, with 13 subjects in each of the AL and HQ-BREAK cohorts. Significant improvements were seen within the AL cohort from weeks 12 to 24 for facial dyschromia (P=0.0158) and skin tone/clarity/evenness (P=0.0067), while there were no significant improvements seen in the HQ-BREAK cohort. The HQ-BREAK cohort had more subjects who worsened with facial dyschromia and skin tone/clarity/evenness. For the mMASI, the HQ-BREAK cohort demonstrated regression at week 24 compared to week 12, while the AL cohort instead experienced continued improvement. This difference was found to be significant (P=0.02). No study-related adverse events were reported for either cohort.  Conclusion: A novel topical product designed to counteract various steps in pigmentation pathways using PATH-3 Technology has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in treating facial dyschromia on a long-term basis. In contrast to the significant rebound experienced by subjects with HQ, the AL cohort continued to demonstrate ongoing improvement. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(1):1266-1270.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7622.

It is important but challenging for prospective health professionals to learn the visual distinction between potentially harmful and harmless skin lesions, such as malignant melanomas and benign nevi. Knowledge about factors related to diagnostic performance is sparse but a prerequisite for designing and evaluating evidence-based educational interventions. Hence, this study explored how the characteristics of 240 skin lesions, the number of classified lesions and the response times of 137 laypeople were related to performance in diagnosing pigmented skin cancer. Our results showed large differences between the lesions, as some were classified correctly by more than 90% and others by less than 10% of the participants. A t-test showed that for melanomas, the correct diagnosis was provided significantly more often than for nevi. Furthermore, we found a significant Pearson correlation between the number of solved tasks and performance in the first 50 diagnostic tasks. Finally, t-tests for investigating the response times revealed that compared to true decisions, participants spent longer on false-negative but not on false-positive decisions. These results provide novel knowledge about performance-related factors that can be useful when designing diagnostic tests and learning interventions for melanoma detection.

BACKGROUND: Infraorbital hyperpigmentation represents one of the most prevalent conditions in cosmetic dermatology. To treat this condition, many patients prefer natural remedies. This study explored the efficacy of topical castor oil cream in treating patients with infraorbital hyperpigmentation.
METHODS: We conducted an exploratory single-arm clinical trial at the Shahid Faghihi Dermatology Clinic and Molecular Dermatology Research Center of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, during 2021-2022. Using the convenience sampling method, we enrolled 25 patients with infraorbital hyperpigmentation. We instructed the patients to apply topical castor oil cream twice daily for 2 months. The darkness, melanin, and erythema levels were evaluated by VisioFace® 1000 D and SkinColorCatch® devices. We used a visual analog scale to assess skin laxity, wrinkles, and patient satisfaction. Data analysis was done with Stata version 14.2.
RESULTS: The data of 22 patients with a mean age of 40.92 ± 7.33 years were analyzed. The VisioFace® scores decreased significantly by the end of the study [right eyes: mean difference (MD): -5.63 (95% CI: -7.12 to -4.15), p < 0.001; left eyes: MD: -5.91 (95% CI: -7.46 to -4.36), p < 0.001]. Moreover, castor oil cream significantly reduced the melanin level, wrinkles, and skin laxity in the infraorbital region (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Castor oil cream seems to be an effective alternative for treating infraorbital hyperpigmentation. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.

UNASSIGNED: Melasma is a common skin condition. Microneedling acts as a dermal delivery system that facilitates the penetration of lightening agents such as vitamin C and tranexamic acid (TXA) into the deeper layers of the skin. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the effectiveness of microneedling with TXA with microneedling and vitamin C in treating melasma.
UNASSIGNED: In patients with melasma, microneedling was performed at 2-3 mm depth. During that, TXA and vitamin C were poured on the skin of each side of the face, and then each ampoule was soaked for 15 min. This method was performed three times in 2-week intervals, and the results were compared by measuring the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score before, during, and 2 months after the completion of the treatment.
UNASSIGNED: The average MASI score in the baseline in the TXA group was 4.61, and in the vitamin C group was 4.58. The average MASI score in the patients treated with TXA in the last treatment session was 2.40, and the group treated with vitamin C was 2.44. The study results showed that the treatment was effective in both groups based on MASI score. Although there was a difference between the responses of the two groups, it was not significant.
UNASSIGNED: Microneedling with vitamin C and TXA is a safe and effective treatment option without side effects for treating melasma.

Dyschromic hypertrophic scar (HTS) is a common sequelae of burn injury, however, its mechanism has not been elucidated. This work is a histological study of these scars with a focus on rete ridges. Rete ridges are important for normal skin physiology, and their absence or presence may hold mechanistic significance in post-burn HTS dyschromia. It was posited that hyper-, and hypo-pigmented areas of scars have different numbers of rete ridges. Subjects with dyschromic burn hypertrophic scar were prospectively enrolled (n = 44). Punch biopsies of hyper-, hypo-, and normally pigmented scar and skin were collected. Biopsies were paraffin embedded, sectioned, stained with H&E, and imaged. The number of rete ridges were investigated. Burn hypertrophic scars that healed without autografts were first investigated. The number of rete ridges was higher in normal skin compared to HTS that was either hypo- (p < 0.01) or hyper-pigmented (p < 0.001). This difference was similar despite scar pigmentation phenotype (p = 0.8687). Autografted hyper-pigmented scars had higher rete ridge ratio compared to non-autografted hyper-pigmented HTS (p < 0.0001). Burn hypertrophihc scars have fewer rete ridges than normal skin. This finding may explain the decreased epidermal adherence to underlying dermis associated with hypertrophic scars. Though, contrary to our hypothesis, no direct link between the extent of dyschromia and rete ridge quantity was observed, the differences in normal skin and hypertrophic scar may lead to further understanding of dyschromic scars.

BACKGROUND: Defensins recruit leucine-rich repeat-containing G protein-coupled receptor 6 positive (Lgr6+) stem cells which ultimately regenerate new basal stem cells, healthy keratinocytes, and nascent hair follicles. Thus, defensins are an exciting, novel therapy for the reversal of skin aging.
METHODS: This is a multicenter, prospective, open-label clinical trial. Twenty healthy subjects, aged 45-80, with Fitzpatrick skin types II-IV were enrolled in the study. A skin care regimen containing alpha-defensin 5 and beta-defensin 3 were applied to the face twice daily for 12 weeks. This skin care regimen contains a greater percentage of defensins than that already studied.7 All participants underwent imaging at baseline, day 30, day 60, and day 90. Primary endpoints included investigator scoring on the Fitzpatrick-Goldman wrinkle scale and percent improvement in periorbital wrinkles, laxity, pigmentation, erythema, texture, and radiance. Secondary endpoints were investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (GAIS), subject GAIS, and investigator assessment of tolerability. A final subject questionnaire was completed on day 90.  Results: Based on the Fitzpatrick-Goldman wrinkle scale, a statistically significant improvement was noted in both wrinkling and elastosis from baseline to day 90. 30% of subjects were rated as much improved and 50% of subjects were rated as improved on the physician GAIS at the 90 day follow up. Improvements were noted in all aspects of skin quality including wrinkles, laxity, dyschromia, erythema, texture, and radiance.  Conclusion: The enhanced formula containing increased concentrations of alpha-defensin 5 and beta-defensin 3 is a safe and efficacious topical therapy for the treatment of periorbital rhytids.
BACKGROUND: Hartman N, Loyal J, Taub A, et al. Clinical trial of alpha and beta defensin skin care regimen for improvement of periocular wrinkles. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(9):874-880. doi:10.36849/JDD.7184.

BACKGROUND: Of all ultraviolet (UV) radiations reaching the earth, UVA1 rays have a higher potential of penetrating and producing clinically harmful consequences. While UV radiations up to 370 nm are well-blocked by current sunscreens, a photoprotection gap remains for the UVA1 wavelengths between 370 and 400 nm.
OBJECTIVE: This study was to assess under outdoor summer conditions the impact on pigmentation and skin ageing signs of a protection against UVA1 using methoxypropylamino cyclohexenylidene ethoxyethylcyanoacetate (MCE) filter added to a reference SPF50 sunscreen, in comparison with the same sunscreen without the MCE filter.
METHODS: This prospective randomized comparative intra-individual study was conducted in 113 women in Brazil and China. Subjects had their face and two forearms exposed twice-daily to a 1-h outdoor sunlight exposure over 8 weeks. Before exposure, the SPF50 sunscreen containing 3% MCE was applied on one half-face and one forearm and the same reference product without MCE on the other half-face and forearm. Primary study endpoint was skin colour changes (chromametry). Other endpoints included expert panel grading of pigmentation and facial skin ageing, and naïve panel assessment of facial skin radiance and homogeneity.
RESULTS: After 8 weeks, the skin was darker on both forearms but the increase in sun-induced pigmentation was smaller with the SPF50/MCE sunscreen. Expert panel evaluations showed no change in severity scores for pigmentation and a decreased severity scores for facial skin ageing in areas protected with the SPF50/MCE product: severity scores in areas protected with the SPF50 alone were either increased (pigmentation) or unchanged (skin ageing). Naïve panel evaluations of skin radiance and homogeneity showed statistically significant superiority of the SPF50/MCE product.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study demonstrates that a protection with the SPF50/MCE sunscreen significantly reduces pigmentation and ageing signs compared to the same SPF50 sunscreen.