这项研究的目的是开发普通话版本的共识听觉感知语音评估(CAPE-V),并评估其可靠性与等级相比,粗糙度,呼吸,Asthenia,菌株(GRBAS)。
CAPE-V工具的普通话版本是从经过验证的英语版本翻译而来的,并带有音素改编,内容调整,和规模修改。60次呼吸困难,20正常,和20个重复的声音样本被纳入这项研究。其中十项用于评估前训练;其余90项使用普通话CAPE-V和GRBAS进行了评估,以比较其评分者和评分者的可靠性。
通过Pearsonr对CAPE-V和Spearmanrho对GRBAS测量内部可靠性。平均CAPE-VPearsonr从应变的0.80到总体严重程度的0.91,与平均GRBASSpearmanrho相比,菌株为0.83,衰弱为0.89。通过组内系数(ICC)来衡量评分者间可靠性。平均CAPE-VICC的音高范围为.57,总体严重程度为.81,与虚弱患者的平均GRBASICC为.60,等级为.83。
普通话CAPE-V解决了英文版的一些限制。它还显示出良好的内部和中间可靠性,与GRBAS相当。
The purpose of this study is to develop the Mandarin version of the
Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) and evaluate its reliability compared with the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain (GRBAS).
The Mandarin version of the CAPE-V tool was translated from the validated English version with phonemic adaptations, content adjustment, and scale modification. Sixty dysphonic, 20 normal, and 20 repeated voice samples were included in this study. Ten of these were used for preassessment training; the remaining 90 were evaluated using the Mandarin CAPE-V and GRBAS for comparison of their interrater and intrarater reliabilities.
Intrarater reliability was measured by Pearson r for the CAPE-V and Spearman rho for the GRBAS. Average CAPE-V Pearson r ranged from 0.80 for strain to 0.91 for overall severity, compared with average GRBAS Spearman rho of 0.83 for strain to 0.89 for asthenia. Interrater reliability was measured by an intraclass coefficient (ICC). Average CAPE-V ICCs ranged from .57 for pitch to .81 for overall severity, compared with average GRBAS ICCs of .60 for asthenia to .83 for grade.
The Mandarin CAPE-V addresses some limits of the English version. It also demonstrates good intrarater and interrater reliability, comparable to those of GRBAS.