Operative time

手术时间
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:针头镜手术是一种微创手术,使用直径为3-mm的细套管针。我们在针镜手术中使用了Turnbull-Cutait牵拉和延迟结肠吻合术,以避免在低位直肠癌的括约肌间切除术中转移回肠造口术。在这项研究中,我们的目的是评估这种“最小皮肤切口和无造口”程序的分流回肠造口术回避率和技术安全性。
    方法:这项单中心回顾性研究是在癌症研究所医院进行的,日本的三级转诊中心。在2017年1月至2020年12月之间,有11例患者接受了针镜括约肌间切除术和分流回肠造口术(NSI组),19例低位直肠癌患者接受针镜括约肌间切除术加延迟结肠吻合术(NSD组)。有关患者背景和短期结果的数据,包括转移回肠造口术回避率,病理结果,术后排便功能,进行组间比较。
    结果:就患者背景而言,NSI组和NSD组之间没有统计学上的显着差异,操作时间(239分钟对220分钟,p=0.68),估计失血量(45克对25克,p=0.29),R0切除率(100%对100%,p=1.00),和术后住院时间(16天对17天,p=0.42)。NSD组分流回肠造口回避率为94.4%。术后12个月的LARS和Wexner评分两组间无显著差异。
    结论:针线镜下括约肌间切除术和延迟结肠肛门吻合术可以安全地在选定的患者中进行,避免分流回肠造口术的比率高,短期结果相当。
    BACKGROUND: Needlescopic surgery is a minimally invasive procedure that uses thin trocars with 3-mm diameter. We used Turnbull-Cutait pull-through and delayed coloanal anastomosis in needlescopic surgery to avoid diverting ileostomy during intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. In this study, we aim to assess the diverting ileostomy avoidance rate and technical safety of this \"minimal skin incision and no stoma\" procedure.
    METHODS: This single-center retrospective study was conducted at the Cancer Institute Hospital, a tertiary referral center in Japan. Between January 2017 and December 2020, 11 patients underwent needlescopic intersphincteric resection with diverting ileostomy (NSI group), and 19 patients underwent needlescopic intersphincteric resection with delayed coloanal anastomosis (NSD group) for low rectal cancer. Data regarding patient backgrounds and short-term outcomes, including diverting ileostomy avoidance rate, pathological results, and postoperative defecatory function, were compared between the groups.
    RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the NSI and NSD groups with respect to patient background, operation time (239 min versus 220 min, p = 0.68), estimated blood loss (45 g versus 25 g, p = 0.29), R0 resection rate (100% versus 100%, p = 1.00), and length of postoperative hospital stay (16 days versus 17 days, p = 0.42). The diverting ileostomy avoidance rate was 94.4% in the NSD group. The LARS and Wexner scores 12 months after surgery were not significantly different between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Needlescopic intersphincteric resection and delayed coloanal anastomosis can be safely performed in selected patients with a high rate of diverting ileostomy avoidance and comparable short-term outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:卡氏胸(PC)主要存在于青少年早期或青春期的生长高峰时期。外貌不佳是寻求外科医生帮助以增强自信心和自尊的主要原因。目前,微创修复是矫正胸壁畸形的有效方法之一。因此,开展青少年PC的MIR临床研究具有重要的现实意义。
    方法:我们在PC组中应用了Abramson程序,或者在PC/PE组中应用了Abramson程序和Nuss程序。我们回顾性回顾了2020年1月至2023年4月在我科接受手术矫正的41例患者的结果。
    结果:所有手术均成功完成,无严重并发症。PC组中位手术时间为80min,PC/PE组为130min。PC组LOS中位数为4天,PC/PE组为5天。PC组压缩深度中位数为32mm,PC/PE组为12mm。术后,有一些并发症。两组9例气胸患者均接受保守治疗。一名患者术后过度矫正。两组均有3例钢丝断裂。一名患者术后再次手术,导致钢丝断裂导致棒材脱位。
    结论:Abramson程序或Abramson程序和Nuss程序在修复PC和PC/PE方面具有良好的短期效果。根据Abramson程序后下平面是否过度压下,应分别选择一个或两个程序。
    BACKGROUND: Pectus carinatum (PC) mainly present at the growth spurt time of the early teenage years or the puberty. Poor outer appearance is a major reason for seeking help for surgeons to increase self-confidence and self-esteem. At present, minimally invasive repair (MIR) is one of effective ways to correct the chest wall deformity. Therefore, there is great practical significance to conduct clinical research on MIR about the adolescent PC.
    METHODS: We applied Abramson procedure in PC group or we applied Abramson procedure and Nuss procedure in PC/PE group. We retrospectively reviewed the results of 41 cases who underwent the surgical correction at our department from January 2020 to April 2023.
    RESULTS: All the procedures were successfully done without severe complications. The median operation Time was 80 min in PC group while was 130 min in PC/PE group. The median LOS were 4 days in PC group while 5 days in PC/PE group. The median compression depth was 32 mm in PC group while 12 mm in PC/PE group. Postoperatively, there are some complications. All Pneumothorax patients being treated conservatively were found in 9 patients in two groups. One patient suffered overcorrection after operation. There were 3 patients suffered steel wires breakage in two groups. One patient reoperation postoperatively for the dislocation of the bar secondary to steel wires breakage.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Abramson procedure or Abramson procedure and Nuss procedure have good short-term results in repair PC and PC/PE. Select one or two procedures should be done individually based on whether the lower plane over depressed after Abramson procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    用于结直肠癌的阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)利用经阴道途径进行肠动员,血管蒂结扎,肿瘤切除术,肠吻合,随着随后的经阴道自然口标本提取(NOSE),减少或消除经腹通路的需要。在这份报告中,我们描述了vNOTES右半结肠切除术治疗盲肠癌的技术,体内吻合和经阴道鼻,包括一步一步的手术视频。该患者为59岁的中国女性(体重指数32.0kg/m2),患有cT3N0M03cm盲肠腺癌。通过插入双环伤口保护器来创建后结肠切除术。vNOTESD2右半结肠切除术与完全吻合的体内吻合术通过自制的经阴道手套口进行,使用超长的刚性仪器。一个10毫米,通过经脐端口使用30°刚性腹腔镜进行手术可视化,没有额外的经皮套管针。操作困难与仪器到达不理想有关,缺乏三角测量,以及在受限访问空间内的频繁冲突。手术时间为300分钟,50毫升的失血。术后疼痛轻微。术后第2天发生肠功能恢复,术后第3天出院。手术后1周,患者恢复正常的日常活动和饮食。自我报告的化妆品满意度得分优异。随访2个月无手术并发症。vNOTES右半结肠切除术联合体内吻合术在高度选择的结肠癌患者中是安全可行的。操作人员应精通常规腹腔镜结肠切除术和经阴道NOSE。需要更多的vNOTES技术经验来确定最佳实践。
    Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) for colorectal cancer utilizes transvaginal access for bowel mobilization, vascular pedicle ligation, oncological resection, and bowel anastomosis, along with subsequent transvaginal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE), reducing or eliminating the need for transabdominal access. In this report, we describe the technique of vNOTES right hemicolectomy for cecal cancer, with intracorporeal anastomosis and transvaginal NOSE, including a step-by-step operative video. The patient was a 59-year-old Chinese female (body mass index 32.0 kg/m2) with a cT3N0M0 3 cm cecal adenocarcinoma. Posterior colpotomy was created with insertion of a dual-ring wound protector. vNOTES D2 right hemicolectomy with a fully stapled intracorporeal anastomosis was performed via a homemade transvaginal glove port, using extra-long rigid instruments. A 10 mm, 30° rigid laparoscope was used for operative visualization through a transumbilical port, without additional percutaneous trocars. Operative difficulties pertained to suboptimal instrument reach, lack of triangulation, and frequent clashing within the restricted access space. Surgical duration was 300 min, with 50 ml of blood loss. There was minimal postoperative pain. Return of bowel function occurred on postoperative day 2, with discharge from hospital on postoperative day 3. The patient resumed normal daily activities and regular diet by 1-week post-surgery. Self-reported cosmetic satisfaction score was excellent. No operative complications were observed at 2 months\' follow-up. vNOTES right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis is safe and feasible in highly selected colon cancer patients. Operators should be proficient in conventional laparoscopic colectomy and transvaginal NOSE. More experience with the vNOTES technique is required to ascertain best practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胃肠道间质瘤(GIST),胃肠道中最常见的间充质肿瘤,越来越多地接受微创手术治疗。开发的技术包括腹腔镜,内窥镜,和胃GIST切除术的混合方法。我们的研究,以单切口腹腔镜胃内切除术为重点,旨在评估其安全性,功效,和长期结果。在一项涉及14例接受单切口腹腔镜胃内切除术的GIST手术的回顾性研究中,我们分析并比较了他们的术前人口统计学,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分,肿瘤大小,新辅助治疗,操作持续时间,住院,有丝分裂和Ki-67指数,以及接受开放和腹腔镜楔形切除术的患者的组织学特征,评估对生存率和无病生存率的影响。平均手术时间为93.07分钟(范围81-120分钟)。平均失血量:67±20mL(范围40-110mL)。术后住院时间平均为6.79天(4-16天)。术前肿瘤大小和病理大小之间观察到强烈的相关性(P=.001,P<.001)。生存分析表明与ASA评分显著相关(P=.031),但没有有丝分裂指数,Ki-67或肿瘤大小。平均生存期为80.57个月,随访期间无复发或转移。根据我们的经验,单切口腹腔镜胃内切除术方法是一种高效的,节省时间,温和的肿瘤学程序,提供安全和微创的替代方案,从而缩短住院时间和出色的长期结局,同时复发率最低。对于更明确的结论,较大,多中心,并建议进行前瞻性研究。
    Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract, are increasingly treated with minimally invasive surgeries. Developed techniques include laparoscopic, endoscopic, and hybrid methods for gastric GIST resection. Our study, focusing on single-incision laparoscopic intragastric resection for gastric GISTs, aims to evaluate its safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes. In a retrospective study of GIST surgery involving 14 patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic intragastric resections, we analyzed and compared their preoperative demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, tumor size, neoadjuvant treatment, operation duration, hospital stay, mitotic and Ki-67 indexes, and histological features with those of patients who underwent open and laparoscopic wedge resections, to assess the impact on both survival and disease-free survival. Average operation time was 93.07 minutes (range 81-120 minutes). Average blood loss: 67 ± 20 mL (range 40-110 mL). Postoperative hospital stay averaged 6.79 days (range 4-16 days). Strong correlations were observed between preoperative and pathological tumor sizes (P = .001, P < .001). Survival analysis indicated a significant association with ASA scores (P = .031), but not with mitotic index, Ki-67, or tumor size. Average survival was 80.57 months, with no recurrence or metastasis during follow-up. Based on our experience, the single-incision laparoscopic intragastric resection method emerges as a highly efficient, timesaving, and gentle oncological procedure, providing a safe and minimally invasive alternative resulting in shorter hospital stays and excellent long-term outcomes with minimal recurrence. For more definitive conclusions, larger, multicenter, and prospective studies are recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    视网膜前膜(ERM)在玻璃体视网膜病理学中提出了共同的挑战,经常导致老年人视力障碍。预眼手术系统(PSS)支持通过机器人辅助膜剥离(RA-MP)手术去除ERM。这项研究比较了使用PSS进行手动膜剥离(MMP)和RA-MP之间的手术时间和医源性出血。
    9例患者接受RA-MP和PSS,而16例患者(18只眼)接受了MMP进行比较分析。手术持续时间分为RA-MP,手动钳在PSS手术中的使用(mRA-MP),传统的MMP。累积手动操作持续时间(cMMP),仪表夹具,术中出血采用Mann-WhitneyU检验进行统计学分析。
    与MMP相比,RA-MP显示出明显更长的剥离时间(P<0.001)。方法之间的皮瓣起始抓握相似(P=0.86),RA-MP显示出剥离抓取(P=0.01)和平均每分钟抓取(P<0.001)的显著减少。虽然RA-MP导致较少的出血,与MMP相比,差异无统计学意义(P=0.08).
    尽管RA-MP倾向于延长手术时间,它在减少组织创伤和术中出血方面具有优势。需要进一步的研究来探索新手外科医生的学习曲线并评估RA-MP的安全性。
    RA-MP可能比手动手术具有潜在的优势,特别是在减少组织创伤和术中出血方面。尽管与手动技术相比,其持续时间更长,RA-MP可能导致更少的抓握动作和更低的出血率,从而提高玻璃体视网膜手术的安全性和精确性。
    UNASSIGNED: Epiretinal membranes (ERM) pose a common challenge in vitreoretinal pathology, often causing vision impairment in older adults. The Preceyes Surgical System (PSS) supports the surgical removal of ERM through robot-assisted membrane peeling (RA-MP). This study compares surgical times and iatrogenic hemorrhages between manual membrane peeling (MMP) and RA-MP using PSS.
    UNASSIGNED: Nine patients underwent RA-MP with PSS, whereas 16 patients (18 eyes) underwent MMP for comparative analysis. Surgical durations were categorized into RA-MP, manual forceps utilization in PSS surgeries (mRA-MP), and traditional MMP. Cumulative manual manipulation duration (cMMP), instrument grasps, and intraoperative hemorrhages were statistically analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
    UNASSIGNED: RA-MP showed significantly longer peeling times compared to MMP (P < 0.001). Flap initiation grasps were similar between methods (P = 0.86), RA-MP demonstrated a significant reduction in peeling grasps (P = 0.01) and mean grasps per minute (P < 0.001). Although RA-MP resulted in fewer hemorrhages, the difference did not reach statistical significance relative to MMP (P = 0.08).
    UNASSIGNED: Although RA-MP tended to extend surgical time, it offered advantages in reducing tissue trauma and intraoperative hemorrhages. Further research is needed to explore the learning curve for novice surgeons and evaluate the safety profile of RA-MP.
    UNASSIGNED: RA-MP may offer potential advantages over manual surgery, particularly in terms of reduced tissue trauma and intraoperative hemorrhages. Despite its longer duration compared with manual techniques, RA-MP may lead to fewer grasping maneuvers and lower rates of hemorrhages, thereby enhancing the safety and precision of vitreoretinal surgeries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:阑尾炎是全球最常见的急性外科疾病之一。然而,夜间阑尾切除术与患者发病率和死亡率之间的关系尚不清楚.这项研究旨在比较夜间和白天阑尾切除术后的结果。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和截至2024年3月26日的WebofScience数据库(更新于2024年7月1日)进行了搜索。主要结果是术后并发症和死亡率。次要结果包括术中并发症,再操作,重新接纳,转换为剖腹手术,住院时间和手术时间。计算平均差(MD)或比值比(OR)和95%置信区间。
    结果:共纳入15项研究,共33,596名患者。夜间和日间阑尾切除术的总体术后并发症发生率没有差异(OR0.93,95%CI0.87,1.00,14项研究),死亡率(OR1.70,95%CI0.37,7.88,7项研究),术中并发症(OR0.88,95%CI0.08,9.86;2项研究),再手术(OR0.39,95%CI0.06,2.55;3项研究)和再入院(OR0.86,95%CI0.65,1.13;I2=0%,5项研究)。然而,与日间相比,夜间行阑尾切除术的患者转换为剖腹手术的风险(OR1.92,95%CI1.12,3.29;6项研究)显著升高.
    结论:与日间阑尾切除术相比,夜间手术的术后死亡率和并发症发生率没有增加或差异。然而,未来的研究应评估夜间转化率较高的原因.
    BACKGROUND: Appendicitis is one of the most common acute surgical conditions globally. However, the association between nighttime appendectomy and patients\' morbidity and mortality is unclear. This study aims to compare outcomes following nighttime versus daytime appendectomy.
    METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to March 26, 2024 (updated on July 1, 2024) were searched. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative complications, reoperation, readmission, conversion to laparotomy, hospital stay and operation time. Mean difference (MD) or odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
    RESULTS: Fifteen studies totaling 33,596 patients were included. There were no differences between nighttime and daytime appendectomy for rates of overall postoperative complications (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87, 1.00, 14 studies), mortality (OR 1.70, 95% CI 0.37, 7.88, 7 studies), intraoperative complications (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.08, 9.86; 2 studies), reoperation (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.06, 2.55; 3 studies) and readmission (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.65, 1.13; I2 = 0%, 5 studies). However, the conversion to laparotomy risks (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.12, 3.29; 6 studies) among patients who underwent appendectomy during nighttime was significantly elevated compared to daytime.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was no increased risk or difference in postoperative mortality and complication rates associated with nighttime compared with daytime appendectomy. However, future studies should assess the reasons for higher conversion rates during the night.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人皮病(PD)是一种获得性疾病,与头发引起的对臀裂皮肤表面的机械力有关,随后形成脓肿,伴有或不伴有引流窦(坑)。虽然目前手术管理是治疗的主要手段,最近,成毛疾病激光治疗(PiLaT)被认为是非炎性疾病的有希望的治疗选择。尽管如此,关于青少年毛发沉积病激光治疗(a-PiLaT)的现有数据很少.
    方法:我们描述了我们从2019年到2023年在三级儿科外科医院对10-17岁青少年进行PiLaT的初步经验。回顾性分析围手术期特征和随访时的临床结果。
    结果:共有17名连续患者(n=12名女性,71%)接受了a-PiLaT。在治疗的时候,患者的平均年龄和体重指数分别为13.6±1.6岁和25.3±5.6kgm-2。平均手术时间为21.5±10.4分钟,而平均随访期为24.5±16.8个月,并发症发生率为24%(n=4),复发率为18%(n=3)。关于术后瘢痕评估,患者和观察者疤痕评估量表的平均评分(评分范围为6~60分,评分越高表示预后越差)分别为14.2±6.5(患者评估)和11.4±4.7(观察者评估).
    结论:a-PiLaT代表了一种管理青少年PD的新方法。我们关于a-PiLaT后一小部分毛囊窦患者结局的初步数据表明,并发症和复发率与文献中报道的成人相当。这种新的微创技术具有巨大的潜力,因此值得在更大的人群中进一步研究。
    BACKGROUND: Pilonidal disease (PD) is an acquired condition related to hair-induced mechanical forces on the skin surface of the intergluteal cleft, with subsequent abscess formation with or without a concomitant draining sinus (pit). While surgical management currently is the mainstay of treatment, pilonidal disease laser treatment (PiLaT) has recently been recognized as a promising treatment option for non-inflammatory diseases. Nonetheless, there is a paucity of available data on adolescent pilonidal disease laser treatment (a-PiLaT).
    METHODS: We describe our preliminary experience with PiLaT performed in adolescents aged 10-17 years at our tertiary paediatric surgical hospital from 2019 to 2023. Data on perioperative characteristics and clinical outcomes at follow-up were retrospectively analysed.
    RESULTS: A total of 17 consecutive patients (n = 12 female, 71%) underwent a-PiLaT. At the time of treatment, the patients\' mean age and body mass index were 13.6 ± 1.6 years and 25.3 ± 5.6 kg m-2, respectively. The mean operative time was 21.5 ± 10.4 min, whereas the mean follow-up period was 24.5 ± 16.8 months, with a complication rate of 24% (n = 4) and recurrence rate of 18% (n = 3). With respect to postsurgical scar assessment, the mean Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores (score range 6-60, with higher scores indicating worse outcome) were 14.2 ± 6.5 (patients\' evaluation) and 11.4 ± 4.7 (observers\' evaluation).
    CONCLUSIONS: The a-PiLaT represents a novel approach for managing PD in adolescents. Our preliminary data on the outcomes of a small series of patients with pilonidal sinuses after a-PiLaT indicated complication and recurrence rates comparable to those reported in the literature for adults. This new minimally invasive technique has great potential and is therefore worthy of further research on a larger population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    OBJECTIVE: To improve the immediate postoperative results in patients with perforated ulcers.
    METHODS: The study enrolled 25 patients with perforated peptic ulcer (diameter of perforation <8 mm). Mean age of patients was 39 years (range 24-56), perforation size - 5.92 mm (range 3-8).
    RESULTS: Mean surgery time was 59.8 min (range 50-85). There were no intraoperative and postoperative complications. All patients were discharged.
    CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method of repair for perforated gastric ulcers is simple, effective, safe and may be recommended for clinical practice.
    UNASSIGNED: Улучшение непосредственных результатов оперативного лечения пациентов с перфоративной язвой посредством использования новой методики ушивания.
    UNASSIGNED: Исследование проведено на 25 пациентах с перфоративной язвой желудка (диаметр перфоративного отверстия не превышал 8 мм). Средний возраст пациентов — 39 лет (от 24 до 56 лет). Средний размер перфоративного отверстия составил 5,92 мм (от 3 до 8 мм).
    UNASSIGNED: Среднее время операции — 59,8 мин (от 50 до 85 мин). Во время оперативных вмешательств и в послеоперационном периоде осложнений отмечено не было. Все пациенты были выписаны в удовлетворительном состоянии на амбулаторное наблюдение у хирурга в поликлинике по месту жительства.
    UNASSIGNED: Предлагаемый способ ушивания перфоративной язвы желудка можно считать простым, эффективным и безопасным способом, который может быть рекомендован к применению в клинической практике.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    根治性膀胱切除术是一项与术后发病率相关的复杂冗长的手术。我们旨在评估根治性膀胱切除术患者的手术时间(OT)及其对术后90天并发症和再入院率的影响。
    回顾性队列研究包括2010年5月至2018年12月在我们机构接受根治性膀胱切除术和尿流改道的296例患者。将369分钟的OT设置为短OT和长OT组之间的截止值。主要结果是术后90天并发症发生率。次要结果是胃肠道恢复时间,住院时间,和90天的再入院率。
    术后90天并发症的总发生率为79.7%,其中43.2%表示根据Clavien-Dindo分类(1级和2级)的低度并发症,和36.5%代表高级别并发症(≥3级)。胃肠道和感染性并发症是我们数据集中最常见的并发症(45.9%和45.6%,分别)。在多变量分析中,延长OT与高级别并发症的几率显著相关(比值比2.340,95%置信区间1.288-4.250,p=0.005).经过倾向得分匹配分析,与短OT组的35例(32.7%)相比,长OT组55例(51.4%)的主要并发症发生率更高(p=0.006).短OT组的胃肠道恢复时间较短(p=0.009)。在单变量和多变量分析中,延长的OT与更高的90天再入院率相关(分别为p<0.001,p=0.001)。
    延长OT(>369分钟)与术后并发症和再入院率的风险增加相关。潜在的术后并发症的感知需要仔细监测这些患者,这可以转化为更好的手术结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Radical cystectomy is a complex lengthy procedure associated with postoperative morbidity. We aimed to assess the operative time (OT) in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and its impact on 90-day postoperative complications and readmission rates.
    UNASSIGNED: The retrospective cohort study included 296 patients undergoing radical cystectomy and urinary diversion from May 2010 to December 2018 in our institution. The OT of 369 min was set as a cutoff value between short and long OT groups. The primary outcome was 90-day postoperative complication rates. Secondary outcomes were gastrointestinal recovery time, length of hospital stay, and 90-day readmission rates.
    UNASSIGNED: The overall incidence of 90-day postoperative complications was 79.7% where 43.2% representing low-grade complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (Grade 1 and Grade 2), and 36.5% representing high-grade complications (Grade≥3). Gastrointestinal tract and infectious complications are the most common complications in our data set (45.9% and 45.6%, respectively). On multivariable analysis, prolonged OT was significantly associated with odds of high-grade complications (odds ratio 2.340, 95% confidence interval 1.288-4.250, p=0.005). After propensity score-matched analysis, a higher incidence of major complications was identified in the long OT group 55 (51.4%) compared to 35 (32.7%) in the short OT group (p=0.006). A shorter gastrointestinal tract recovery time was noticed in the short OT group (p=0.009). Prolonged OT was associated with a higher 90-day readmission rate on univariate and multivariate analyses (p<0.001, p=0.001, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: Prolonged OT (>369 min) is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications and readmission rates. The perception of potential postoperative complications requires careful monitoring of these patients which could translate into better operative outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:转移结肠造口术后新辅助治疗是梗阻性直肠癌的首选治疗方法。可以通过机器人方法治疗这样的患者,其具有优于常规腹腔镜手术的几个优点。相反,现有的造口可能会干扰套管针的最佳位置,从而影响机器人手术的质量。此外,控制台外科医生不面对病人,这可能会危及造口。
    方法:在我院接受新辅助治疗后,使用机器人平台对接受保括约肌手术的直肠癌患者进行回顾性调查。基于预处理造口的创建,患者分为NS组(无造口组)和S组(有造口组).基线特征,新辅助治疗的类型,短期手术结果,术后肛门直肠测压数据,比较各组之间的生存率。
    结果:NS组和S组包括65和9名患者,分别。NS组的三名患者需要转换为剖腹手术。S组比NS组需要更长的控制台时间(中位数:367vs.253分钟,分别,p=0.038);然而,总手术时间(p=0.15)和失血量(p=0.70)无差异.术后并发症发生率,肛门直肠功能,两组之间的肿瘤结局相似.
    结论:尽管造口患者的控制台时间较长,机器人手术可以像新辅助治疗后没有造口的人一样安全地进行.
    BACKGROUND: Diverting colostomy followed by neoadjuvant treatment is a treatment of choice for obstructive rectal cancer. Such patients may be treated via a robotic approach with several advantages over conventional laparoscopic surgery. Conversely, the existing stoma may interfere with the optimal trocar position and thus affect the quality of robotic surgery. Moreover, the console surgeon does not face the patient, which may endanger the stoma.
    METHODS: Patients with rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery were retrospectively investigated using a robotic platform after neoadjuvant treatment at our hospital. Based on pretreatment stoma creation, patients were divided into the NS (those without a stoma) and S groups (patients with a stoma). Baseline characteristics, types of neoadjuvant treatment, short-term surgical outcomes, postoperative anorectal manometric data, and survival were compared between the groups.
    RESULTS: The NS and S groups comprised 65 and 9 patients, respectively. Conversion to laparotomy was required in three patients in the NS group. The S group required a longer console time than the NS group (median: 367 vs. 253 min, respectively, p = 0.038); however, no difference was observed in the total operative time (p = 0.15) and blood loss (p = 0.70). Postoperative complication rates, anorectal function, and oncological outcomes were similar between the groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although console time was longer in patients with a stoma, robotic surgery could be performed safely like in those without a stoma after neoadjuvant treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号