Operative time

手术时间
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The widespread acceptance of robotic surgery is extending to oral procedures. The demand for minimally invasive techniques is driving research into the cosmetic and oncologic benefits of robotic neck surgery. This study used propensity score matching to analyze the clinical course and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted neck dissections for oncologic efficacy and surgical safety. Between May 2020 and April 2024, 200 OSCC patients underwent surgery and 42 were excluded. The cohort included 158 patients, 128 of whom underwent unilateral neck dissection and 30 of whom underwent bilateral neck dissection. Robotic-assisted neck dissection (RAND) was performed in 36 patients while conventional transcervical neck dissection (CTND) was performed in 122 patients. Data analysis included several factors, including lymph node retrieval and perioperative outcomes, with 1:1 propensity score matching to ensure fairness. Each of the 39 neck specimens with 36 patients was selected. The CTND group was 8 years older overall than the RAND group, but otherwise similar in terms of primary site and clinical stage. The RAND group had a 55-min longer operative time and 140 cc more hemovac drainage than the CTND group, but the hospital stay and intensive care unit duration were the same, and the number of lymph nodes retrieved was the same. Survival rates also showed no difference across all stages. This shows that RAND is in no way inferior to CTND in terms of perioperative or oncologic outcomes, and demonstrates the safety of robot-assisted surgery, even in patients who require flaps or in patients with advanced stages.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在证明使用hinotori™手术机器人系统进行机器人胃切除术的可行性和安全性(MedicaroidCorporation,神户,日本)。
    方法:我们回顾性纳入了2023年6月至2024年1月在我院接受了hinotori™手术机器人系统胃切除术治疗胃癌的16例患者。主治医生做了几乎所有的淋巴结切除术,包括船只的剪裁。助理外科医生使用血管密封装置和重建期间支持淋巴结清扫术。
    结果:13例患者为cI期,一名患者为CII期,两名患者为CIII期。远端胃切除术,近端胃切除术,11、1和4例患者进行了全胃切除术,分别。11例和5例患者行D1+和D2淋巴结切除术,分别。Billroth-I,Billroth-II,Roux-en-Y,食管胃造口术在三个人中进行,六,六,还有一个病人,分别。中位手术时间为282(245-338)min,中位控制台时间为226(185-266)分钟。中位失血量为28(12-50)mL,术后第1天引流液中的淀粉酶中位数为280(148-377)U/L,术后第3天为74(42-148)U/L。一名接受近端胃切除术的患者出现吻合口漏(Clavien-Dindo[CD]IIIa)。术后中位住院时间为12.5(12-14)天。
    结论:在此初始案例系列中,hinotori™手术机器人系统对胃癌患者是安全可行的,建议适合胃切除术,包括远端胃切除术和全胃切除术。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to prove the feasibility and safety of robotic gastrectomy using the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System (Medicaroid Corporation, Kobe, Japan).
    METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled the 16 patients who underwent gastrectomy by the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System for gastric cancer at our hospital between June 2023 and January 2024. Console surgeons performed almost all lymphadenectomies, including the clipping of vessels. Assistant surgeons supported the lymphadenectomy using vessel sealing devices and during reconstruction.
    RESULTS: Thirteen patients were cStage I, one patient was cStage II, and two patients were cStage III. Distal gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy, and total gastrectomy were performed in 11, 1, and 4 patients, respectively. D1+ and D2 lymphadenectomies were performed in 11 and 5 patients, respectively. Billroth-I, Billroth-II, Roux-en-Y, and esophagogastrostomy were performed in three, six, six, and one patients, respectively. The median operation time was 282 (245-338) min, and the median console time was 226 (185-266) min. The median blood loss was 28 (12-50) mL, and the median amylase levels in drainage fluid were 280 (148-377) U/L on postoperative day 1 and 74 (42-148) U/L on postoperative day 3. There was anastomotic leakage (Clavien-Dindo [CD] IIIa) in one patient who underwent proximal gastrectomy. The median postoperative hospital stay was 12.5 (12-14) days.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this initial case series, the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System was found to be safe and feasible for patients with gastric cancer and is suggested to be appropriate for gastrectomy, including distal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    四名直肠癌患者需要重建阴道后壁的缺损。所有患者均接受新辅助(化学)放疗,然后对直肠和阴道后壁进行会阴整块(腹部)切除。阴道缺损的程度需要使用带有皮肤岛的组织瓣进行闭合。臀部翻转皮瓣用于此目的,以替代常规的更具侵入性的肌皮瓣(gracilis,臀肌,或腹直肌)。臀翻皮瓣是通过一个弯曲的切口在距会阴伤口边缘2.5厘米的最大宽度创建的,从而创造了一个半月形的皮肤岛。皮下脂肪被解剖到臀肌,臀肌筋膜被切开了.此后,将皮瓣旋转到缺损中,并将皮肤岛缝合到阴道壁缺损中。动员对侧皮下脂肪在中线进行会阴闭合,之后没有供体部位可见。手术时间从77到392分钟不等,住院时间为3至16天。两名患者会阴伤口裂开,需要对一名患者进行额外的VY臀部成形术。所有患者均实现了阴道和会阴伤口的完全愈合。臀肌翻转皮瓣是一种最有前途的微创技术,可在直肠癌的腹部手术切除后重建阴道后壁缺损。
    Four patients with rectal cancer required reconstruction of a defect of the posterior vaginal wall. All patients received neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, followed by an en bloc (abdomino)perineal resection of the rectum and posterior vaginal wall. The extent of the vaginal defect necessitated closure using a tissue flap with skin island. The gluteal turnover flap was used for this purpose as an alternative to conventional more invasive myocutaneous flaps (gracilis, gluteus, or rectus abdominis). The gluteal turnover flap was created through a curved incision at a maximum width of 2.5 cm from the edge of the perineal wound, thereby creating a half-moon shape skin island. The subcutaneous fat was dissected toward the gluteal muscle, and the gluteal fascia was incised. Thereafter, the flap was rotated into the defect and the skin island was sutured into the vaginal wall defect. The contralateral subcutaneous fat was mobilized for perineal closure in the midline, after which no donor site was visible.The duration of surgery varied from 77 to 392 min, and the hospital stay ranged between 3 and 16 days. A perineal wound dehiscence occurred in two patients, requiring an additional VY gluteal plasty in one patient. Complete vaginal and perineal wound healing was achieved in all patients. The gluteal turnover flap is a promising least invasive technique to reconstruct posterior vaginal wall defects after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了减少青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者接受后路脊柱内固定和融合术(PSIF)的手术时间,我们部门制定了一项质量改进计划,其中2例AIS病例由在1个手术室(OR)共同手术的同两名外科医生在1天内完成.我们描述了这项倡议的结果,将手术时间和结果与这些外科医生单独手术的病例进行比较。
    方法:从2017年至2023年,年龄在10至18岁的AIS患者接受PSIF前瞻性招募“两个脊柱星期二”。“患者按年龄匹配,性别,曲线严重性,以及与历史AIS控件融合的级别数量。结果包括手术时间,总OR时间,估计失血量(EBL),转染的细胞保存者的体积,异体输血,逗留时间,90天再入院,Clavien-Dindo-Sink并发症分类系统并发症发生率,以及SRS-22达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)的百分比。
    结果:将组成2脊柱组(第2组)的55名患者与55名历史性别匹配和年龄匹配的对照组(第1组)进行了比较。两组之间的主要冠状曲线和平均融合水平数相似。总体手术时间(203vs.296分钟,P<0.001),总OR时间(P<0.001),和EBL(400vs.550mL,第2组的P<0.001)较低。第2组的并发症较少[n=17(31%)与n=28(51%),P=0.03]。
    结论:同一天由2名外科医生在1个OR中进行2例AIS病例可缩短手术时间,减少手术室的总时间,并发症发生率较低,与单外科医生匹配的对照组相比,失血更少。
    方法:III级回顾性比较研究。
    BACKGROUND: To lessen surgical times for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion (PSIF), our department developed a quality improvement initiative where 2 AIS cases were completed in 1 day by the same 2 surgeons operating together in 1 operating room (OR). We describe the results of this initiative, comparing operative times and outcomes to cases of these surgeons operating individually.
    METHODS: From 2017 to 2023, patients aged 10 to 18 years with AIS undergoing PSIF were prospectively enrolled for \"Two Spine Tuesday.\" Patients were matched by age, sex, curve severity, and number of levels fused to historical AIS controls. Outcomes included surgery time, total OR time, estimated blood loss (EBL), volume of cell saver transfused, allogenic blood transfusion, length of stay, 90-day readmissions, Clavien-Dindo-Sink Complication Classification System complication rates, and percentage who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for SRS-22.
    RESULTS: Fifty-five patients composing the 2-spine group (group 2) were compared with 55 historical sex-matched and age-matched controls (group 1). Major coronal curve and average number of levels fused were similar between groups. Overall surgery time (203 vs. 296 min, P <0.001), total OR time ( P <0.001), and EBL (400 vs. 550 mL, P <0.001) were lower for group 2. Group 2 had fewer complications [n=17 (31%) vs. n=28 (51%), P =0.03].
    CONCLUSIONS: Performing 2 AIS cases in 1 OR by 2 surgeons the same day resulted in shorter surgery times, less total time in the operating room, lower complication rates, and less blood loss compared with single-surgeon matched controls.
    METHODS: Level III-retrospective comparative study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:无论何种类型的肝切除,肝手术都与大量的住院时间相关。大切口对于开放肝脏手术是必不可少的,这是患者康复过程中的主要因素。对于需要手术切除的肝实质小病变患者,机器人手术可能提供机会来改变病人的术后过程。当患者计划在入院后24小时内进行肝脏手术时,我们机构制定并实施了日间机器人肝脏切除途径。
    方法:2022年9月至2023年11月在三级肝胆和胰腺中心进行的单外科医生病例系列病例。纳入标准是非解剖楔形切除术,<2个解剖节段切除,左外肝切除术和微创手术。
    结果:这是英国第一系列机器人日间小型肝切除术。该病例系列包括20名患者。平均手术时间为86.6±30.9分钟,平均控制台时间为58.6±24.5分钟。13例(65%)在手术后24小时内出院。住院超过24小时的主要原因是疼痛缓解不足。没有Clavien-DindoIII级或以上并发症,没有30天的再入院和90天的死亡率。
    结论:本病例系列证明机器人日常肝切除是安全可行的。必须有健全的后续途径,以便安全实施这种方法,监测任何并发症,并根据需要及时进行干预。
    BACKGROUND: Liver surgery is associated with a significant hospital stay regardless the type of liver resection. A large incision is essential for open liver surgery which is a major factor in the course of the patient\'s recovery. For patients with small parenchyma liver lesions requiring surgical resection, robotic surgery potentially offers the opportunity to transform the patient\'s post-operative course. A day-case robotic liver resection pathway was formulated and implemented at our institution when patients were planned for discharge within 24 h of admission for liver surgery.
    METHODS: Single surgeon case series of cases performed at a tertiary hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre between September 2022 and November 2023. The inclusion criteria were non-anatomical wedge resections, < 2 anatomical segmental resections, left lateral hepatectomy and minimally invasive surgery.
    RESULTS: This is the first series of robotic day-case minor liver resection in the United Kingdom. 20 patients were included in this case series. The mean operative time was 86.6 ± 30.9 min and mean console time was 58.6 ± 24.5 min. Thirteen patients (65%) were discharged within 24 h of surgery. The main cause of hospitalisation beyond 24 h was inadequate pain relief. There were no Clavien-Dindo grade III or above complications, no 30-day readmission and 90-day mortalities.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case series demonstrates that robotic day-case liver resection is safe and feasible. Robust follow-up pathways must be in place to allow for the safe implementation of this approach, to monitor for any complications and to allow intervention as required in a timely manner.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:脑室腹膜(VP)分流术是一种分流脑脊液(CSF)以治疗脑积水的方法。修订率,操作时间,和腹腔镜插入远端导管后的住院时间(LOS)已混合。关于VP分流插入过程中粘连松解作用的数据有限。瓣膜特性也已显示影响患者结果。关于这些变量对分流结果的影响的澳大利亚数据报告很少。我们的目的是研究患者的人口统计学,适应症,以及澳大利亚背景下的手术和器械变量。
    方法:我们进行了回顾性研究,多外科医生,通过开放或腹腔镜技术插入成人VP分流器的单中心分析。从医院医疗记录和澳大利亚分流登记处收集了有关患者人口统计学和手术特征的数据。主要结果是分流翻修率,次要结果是术后并发症,操作时间和LOS,和分流生存能力。
    结果:56名参与者符合分析条件。整体修订率为14.3%,低于全国平均水平。远端导管翻修率为0%。腹腔镜下插入远端导管可显著缩短手术时间(开腹组70.4min,腹腔镜组50.7min,p<0.001)。这在不同的病因上得到了证明,当控制年龄和瓣膜类型时(p<0.05)。非可编程阀的修订率高于可编程阀(42.9%对2.9%,分别)。以前的腹部手术没有区别,LOS,并发症,或开放和腹腔镜插入之间的翻修率。腹腔镜组的VP分流存活率更高(腹腔镜组和开腹组的90天分流存活率分别为96.7%和92%,分别为;p>0.05)。我们没有发现手术时间或住院时间的年龄有任何显著差异,性别,或者以前的腹部手术,即使考虑到手术技术。不同年龄段的适应症和分流生存能力差异很大。腹腔镜插入的使用随着时间的推移而增加,尽管外科医生没有交叉技术。
    结论:VP分流的整体远端翻修率较低。腹腔镜下插入远端导管可减少手术时间,并可提高分流器的生存能力。需要更大规模的研究来确认开放与腹腔镜远端导管插入的分流存活性差异,年龄组之间,临床适应症,和瓣膜类型对患者预后的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt insertion is a means of diverting cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for management of hydrocephalus. Revision rates, operating time, and length of stay (LOS) following laparoscopic insertion of the distal catheter have been mixed. There are limited data on the role of adhesiolysis during VP shunt insertion. Valve characteristics have also been shown to influence patient outcomes. There is a paucity of Australian data reporting on the effect of these variables on shunt outcomes. We aimed to study patient demographics, indications, and surgical and instrument variables in the Australian context.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multi-surgeon, single-centre analysis of VP shunts inserted in adults via an open or laparoscopic technique. Data on patient demographics and surgery characteristics were collected from the hospital medical records and the Australasian Shunt Registry. The primary outcome was shunt revision rate and secondary outcomes were postoperative complications, operating time and LOS, and shunt survivability.
    RESULTS: Fifty-six participants were eligible for analysis. The overall revision rate was 14.3 %, which was lower than the national average. The distal catheter revision rate was 0 %. Laparoscopic insertion of the distal catheter was shown to significantly reduce operating time (70.4 min in the open group and 50.7 min in the laparoscopic group, p < 0.001). This was demonstrated across different aetiologies, and when controlling for age and valve-type (p < 0.05). The revision rate of non-programmable was higher than programmable valves (42.9 % versus 2.9 %, respectively). There were no differences between previous abdominal surgery, LOS, complication, or revision rate between open and laparoscopic insertion. VP shunt survivability was greater in the laparoscopic group (90-day shunt survival of 96.7 % and 92 % in the laparoscopy and open groups, respectively; p > 0.05). We did not find any significant difference in operating time or length of stay for age, sex, or previous abdominal surgery, even when accounting for surgical technique. Indication and shunt survivability varied widely between age groups. The use of laparoscopic insertion increased over time, though surgeons did not crossover techniques.
    CONCLUSIONS: The overall distal revision rate of VP shunts is low. Laparoscopic insertion of the distal catheter reduces operating time and may improve shunt survivability. Larger studies are needed to confirm differences in shunt survivability in open versus laparoscopic distal catheter insertion, between age groups, clinical indications, and valve type on patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在建立经乳晕单部位内镜甲状旁腺切除术(TASSEP)的标准化程序,并比较TASSEP与常规开放性甲状旁腺切除术(COP)的性能。
    方法:本研究纳入了40例原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进(PHPT)患者,纳入176例PHPT患者中的40例,这些患者接受了基于倾向评分匹配的COP.回顾性分析基于前瞻性收集的数据。围手术期结果,包括手术轮廓,报告了手术负担和美容结果以及随访情况.使用累积和(CUSUM)分析描述学习曲线。
    结果:40例TASSEP成功完成,无转化或严重并发症。TASSEP组和COP组手术时间差异无统计学意义(80.83±11.95vs.76.95±7.30min,p=0.084)。需要17例病例的经验才能达到TASSEP的学习曲线。TASSEP术后疼痛评分和创伤指数(C反应蛋白和血沉)明显低于COP组(p<0.05)。在扩散和稳定阶段,TASSEP与明显更好的切口恢复和美容评分相关。在整个随访期间,术后血清钙和PTH水平表明两组患者的手术质量均令人满意。
    结论:基于三维(3D)虚拟建模的精确术前定位和术中计划,TASSEP可以在选择的患者中可行地进行,成功率令人满意,并发症发生率低。提供较好的美容效果,并在一定程度上减轻手术负担。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to establish the standardized procedure of trans-areola single site endoscopic parathyroidectomy (TASSEP), and to compare the performance of TASSEP with that of conventional open parathyroidectomy (COP).
    METHODS: This study enrolled 40 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) who underwent TASSEP, and included 40 of 176 PHPT patients who underwent COP based on propensity score matching. The retrospective analysis was conducted based on prospectively collected data. Perioperative outcomes, including surgical profile, surgical burden and cosmetic results and follow-up were reported. The learning curve was described using a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis.
    RESULTS: 40 TASSEPs were completed successfully without conversions or severe complications. There was no statistically significant difference in operation time between TASSEP and COP groups (80.83 ± 11.95 vs. 76.95 ± 7.30 min, p = 0.084). Experience of 17 cases was necessitated to reach the learning curve of TASSEP. Postoperative pain score and traumatic index (C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) in TASSEP were apparently lower than those in COP group (p < 0.05). During the proliferation and stabilization phases, TASSEP was associated with significantly better incision recovery and cosmetic scores. Postoperative serum calcium and PTH levels throughout the follow-up period indicated satisfactory surgical qualities in both groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on precise preoperative localization and intraoperative planning facilitated by three-dimensional (3D) virtual modeling, TASSEP can be feasibly performed on selected patients with satisfactory success rates and low complication rates, providing preferable cosmetic results and alleviating the surgical burden to a certain extent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后由于胆结石(DG)掉落而可能发生复发性脓肿。识别和适当的经皮内窥镜检查和图像引导的治疗方案可以降低与这种情况相关的发病率。
    方法:我们报告了一项微创内窥镜检查和图像引导技术,用于收集6例胆结石脱落患者(M/F=3/3;中位年龄:75.5岁[68~82]),表现为继发于结石脱落的复发性或慢性腹内脓肿。技术成功被定义为所有石头的可视化和检索。DG在术前成像中被鉴定。脓肿复发人数为12(1/6),1(3/6)0(2/6),胆囊切除术和脓肿发展之间的中位间隔为2个月(1至21)。
    结果:所有病例均采用经皮内镜和透视指导。4例患者(66%)获得技术成功。中位手术时间为65.8分钟(39至136)。透视时间和剂量中位数分别为12.6分钟(3.3至67)和234mGy(31至1457),分别。术中、术后均无并发症。在中位随访193天(51至308天)的成功手术中,未报告脓肿复发。
    结论:经皮图像和内镜引导下碎石/取石术是安全有效的。该技术是胆结石掉落的开放式手术的合适替代方法。
    方法:第4级,案例系列。
    BACKGROUND: Recurrent abscesses can happen due to dropped gallstones (DGs) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Recognition and appropriate percutaneous endoscopy and image-guided treatment options can decrease morbidity associated with this condition.
    METHODS: We report a minimally invasive endoscopy and image-guided technique for retrieval of dropped gallstones in a series of 6 patients (M/F=3/3; median age: 75.5 years [68 to 82]) presenting with recurrent or chronic intra-abdominal abscesses secondary to dropped gallstones. Technical success was defined as the visualization and retrieval of all stones. DGs were identified on pre-procedure imaging. Number of abscesses recurrence was 12 (1/6), 1 (3/6), and 0 (2/6) with a median interval of 2 months (1 to 21) between cholecystectomy and abscess development.
    RESULTS: Percutaneous endoscopy and fluoroscopy guidance were utilized in all cases. Technical success was achieved in 4 patients (66%). The median procedure time was 65.8 minutes (39 to 136). The median fluoroscopy time and dose were 12.6 min (3.3 to 67) and 234 mGy (31 to 1457), respectively. There were no intraprocedure and postprocedure complications. No abscess recurrence was reported among successful procedures during a median follow-up of 193 days (51 to 308).
    CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous image and endoscopy-guided lithotripsy/lithectomy are safe and effective. This technique is a suitable alternative to open surgery for dropped gallstones.
    METHODS: Level 4, Case Series.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本文旨在分享腹膜前eTEP方法的初步经验及其在选定的一组患者中的潜在益处。eTEPRives-Stoppa是一种经过验证的微创手术技术,用于治疗腹侧中线和非中线疝,耐用,和可重复的修复。腹膜前eTEP修复是一种手术技术,可将腹膜外入路手术与腹膜前修复结合起来,用于原发性中线疝,避免了后直肌鞘分裂和保留直肌后间隙,同时能够治疗直肌同时舒张。
    方法:分析包括2022年9月至2023年9月采用腹膜前eTEP方法手术的33例原发性小到中(<4cm)中线疝患者,有或没有直肠舒张的单个或多个缺陷。年龄,性别,疝的特点,手术时间,将讨论手术部位的发生,以及手术技术中的细节和地标。
    结果:连续33例患者接受了手术,年龄在32至63岁之间的19名女性(57.5%)和14名男性(42.5%),最常见的合并症是肥胖(BMI>30).在70%的案例中,手术时间为90min±25min。平均住院时间是一天,而12人在同一天回家,到目前为止,没有复发的报道。
    结论:我们相信腹膜前eTEP方法治疗中小型原发性中线疝是一种有效而坚固的修复方法,它结合了成熟的手术技术的优良特征,消除了对后直肌鞘的分割,同时节省了后直肌空间,其他的好处将被讨论。该技术的可重复性仍有待证明。
    BACKGROUND: This article aims to share the initial experience of the preperitoneal eTEP approach and its potential benefits in a selected group of patients. The eTEP Rives-Stoppa is a proven minimally invasive surgical technique for the treatment of ventral midline and off-midline hernias that has shown to be a solid, durable, and reproducible repair. The preperitoneal eTEP repair is a surgical technique that brings together the extraperitoneal access surgery with a preperitoneal repair for primary midline hernias avoiding posterior rectus sheath division and preservation of the retrorectus space while being able to treat simultaneous diastasis recti.
    METHODS: The analysis included 33 patients operated with the preperitoneal eTEP approach from September 2022 to September 2023 in patients with primary small to medium (< 4 cm) midline hernias, single or multiple defects with or without diastasis recti. Age, gender, hernia characteristics, operative time, and surgical site occurrences will be discussed, as well as fine details and landmarks in the operative technique.
    RESULTS: 33 consecutive patients were operated, 19 female (57.5%) and 14 males (42.5%) between 32 and 63 years of age, the most common comorbidity found was obesity (BMI > 30). In 70% of the cases, operative time was 90 min ± 25 min. The average hospital stay was one day, while 12 went home the same day, and so far, no reoccurrences have been reported.
    CONCLUSIONS: We believe the preperitoneal eTEP approach for small to medium primary midline hernias is an effective and solid repair that combines excellent features of proven surgical techniques and eliminates the need for posterior rectus sheath division while saving the retrorectus space, among other benefits that will be discussed. The reproducibility of the technique remains to be proven.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:开腹手术治疗骨盆前弧病变有多种并发症。我们介绍了第一个使用腹腔镜检查作为替代方法的回顾性描述性病例系列。
    方法:这是描述性的,回顾性,单中心研究纳入了在2020年5月至2022年3月期间接受腹腔镜手术治疗骨盆环破裂的所有患者.主要结果是基于转换为开放手术的手术失败率。次要结果是外科手术的持续时间,x射线照射,住院时间,术后疼痛评估,最后一次随访时的功能评分。
    结果:该研究包括两名女性和12名男性。研究参与者的平均年龄为44.2(23-67)岁。总的来说,9例(64.3%)患者有耻骨联合分离,4人(28.6%)双侧闭孔框架骨折,一个(7%)两者都有。没有患者需要转换为开放手术。耻骨联合破坏的中位手术时间,闭孔框架骨折,两种受伤的患者均为90.0(60-120),135(105-180),240分钟,分别。中位总手术时间为102.5(60-240)min。最后一次随访时,爱荷华州盆腔评分和Majeed功能评分中位数分别为87(70-99)和84(70-100),分别。
    结论:腹腔镜内固定是骨盆环破裂的可靠治疗方法。我们患者的临床和放射学结果表明,该技术可替代开放方法。
    OBJECTIVE: Open surgical approaches for the treatment of anterior pelvic arc lesions are associated with several complications. We present the first retrospective descriptive case series on the use of laparoscopy as an alternative.
    METHODS: This descriptive, retrospective, single-centre study enrolled all patients who underwent laparoscopy for the treatment of pelvic ring disruption between May 2020 and March 2022. The primary outcome was the procedure failure rate based on conversion to open surgery. Secondary outcomes were the duration of the surgical procedure, x-ray exposure, length of hospitalisation, postoperative pain assessment, and functional scores at the last follow-up.
    RESULTS: The study included two females and 12 males. The mean age of the study participants was 44.2 (23-67) years. In total, nine (64.3%) patients had pubic symphysis disjunction, four (28.6%) had bilateral fractures of the obturator frames, and one (7%) had both. None of the patients required conversion to open surgery. The median operating times for symphysis pubis disruption, obturator frame fracture, and patients with both injuries were 90.0 (60-120), 135 (105-180), and 240 min, respectively. The median overall operating time was 102.5 (60-240) min. The median Iowa Pelvic Score and Majeed Functional Score at the last follow-up were 87 (70-99) and 84 (70-100), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic internal fixation is a reliable treatment for pelvic ring disruption. The clinical and radiological outcomes of our patients suggest the usefulness of this technique as an alternative to open approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号