BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in resistance to many of the antimicrobials used to treat Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) nationally and internationally. Primary clarithromycin resistance and dual clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance are high in Ireland. These trends call for an evaluation of best-practice management strategies.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to revise the recommendations for the management of H. pylori infection in adult patients in the Irish healthcare setting.
METHODS: The Irish H. pylori working group (IHPWG) was established in 2016 and reconvened in 2023 to evaluate the most up-to-date literature on H. pylori diagnosis, eradication rates and antimicrobial resistance. The \'GRADE\' approach was then used to rate the quality of available evidence and grade the resulting recommendations.
RESULTS: The Irish H. pylori working group agreed on 14 consensus statements. Key recommendations include (1) routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide therapy is no longer recommended other than for clarithromycin susceptibility testing for first-line treatment (statements 6 and 9), (2) clarithromycin triple therapy should only be prescribed as first-line therapy in cases where clarithromycin susceptibility has been confirmed (statement 9), (3) bismuth quadruple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, metronidazole, tetracycline) is the recommended first-line therapy if clarithromycin resistance is unknown or confirmed (statement 10), (4) bismuth quadruple therapy with a proton pump inhibitor, levofloxacin and amoxicillin is the recommended second-line treatment (statement 11) and (5) rifabutin amoxicillin triple therapy is the recommend rescue therapy (statement 12).
CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are intended to provide the most relevant current best-practice guidelines for the management of H. pylori infection in adults in Ireland.

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is a predominant nosocomial infection, and guidelines for improving diagnosis and treatment were published in 2017. We conducted a single-center, retrospective 10-year cohort study of patients with primary C. difficile infectious disease (CDID) at the largest referral Lithuanian university hospital, aiming to evaluate the clinical and laboratory characteristics of CDID and their association with the outcomes, as well as implication of concordance with current Clinical Practice Guidelines. The study enrolled a total of 370 patients. Cases with non-concordant CDID treatment resulted in more CDID-related Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions (7.5 vs. 1.8%) and higher CDID-related mortality (13.0 vs. 1.8%) as well as 30-day all-cause mortality (61.0 vs. 36.1%) and a lower 30-day survival compared with CDID cases with concordant treatment (p < 0.05). Among cases defined by two criteria for severe CDID, only patients with non-concordant metronidazole treatment had refractory CDID (68.8 vs. 0.0%) compared with concordant vancomycin treatment. In the presence of non-concordant metronidazole treatment for severe CDID, only cases defined by two severity criteria had more CDID-related ICU admissions (18.8 vs. 0.0%) and higher CDID-related mortality (25.0 vs. 2.0%, p < 0.05) compared with cases defined by one criterion. Severe comorbidities and the continuation of concomitant antibiotics administered at CDID onset reduced (p < 0.05) the 30-day survival and increased (p = 0.053) 30-day all-cause mortality, with 57.6 vs. 10.7% and 52.0 vs. 25.0%, respectively. Conclusions: CDID treatment non-concordant with the guidelines was associated with various adverse outcomes. In CDID with leukocytes ≥ 15 × 109/L and serum creatinine level > 133 µmol/L (>1.5 mg/dL), enteral vancomycin should be used to avoid refractory response, as metronidazole use was associated with CDID-related ICU admission and CDID-related mortality. Severe comorbidities worsened the outcomes as they were associated with reduced 30-day survival. The continuation of concomitant antibiotic therapy increased 30-day all-cause mortality; thus, it needs to be reasonably justified, deescalated or stopped.

Systemic antimicrobial treatments are commonly prescribed to dogs with acute diarrhoea, while nutraceuticals (prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics) are frequently administered as an alternative treatment. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of antimicrobials and nutraceutical preparations for treatment of canine acute diarrhoea (CAD). The results of this study will be used to create evidence-based treatment guidelines. PICOs (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome) were generated by a multidisciplinary expert panel taking into account opinions from stakeholders (general practitioners and dog owners). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. The systematic search yielded six randomised controlled trials (RCT) for antimicrobial treatment and six RCTs for nutraceutical treatment meeting the eligibility criteria. Categories of disease severity (mild, moderate, and severe) were created based on the presence of systemic signs and response to fluid therapy. Outcomes included duration of diarrhoea, duration of hospitalization, progression of disease, mortality, and adverse effects. High certainty evidence showed that antimicrobial treatment did not have a clinically relevant effect on any outcome in dogs with mild or moderate disease. Certainty of evidence was low for dogs with severe disease. Nutraceutical products did not show a clinically significant effect in shortening the duration of diarrhoea (based on very low to moderate certainty evidence). No adverse effects were reported in any of the studies.

BACKGROUND: Metronidazole is a commonly prescribed antimicrobial in Australian hospitals. Inappropriate use may increase risks to patient care, such as toxicities and antimicrobial resistance. To date, there is limited information on the quality of metronidazole prescriptions to inform antimicrobial stewardship and quality improvement initiatives. This study aims to describe the quality of metronidazole prescribing practices in Australian hospitals.
METHODS: Retrospective data analysis of the Hospital National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Hospital NAPS). Data were collected by auditors at each participating hospital using a standardised auditing tool. All data from 2013 to 2021 were de-identified and analysed descriptively. Variables included were antimicrobial prescribed, indication, guideline compliance and appropriateness.
RESULTS: Metronidazole was the fifth most prescribed antimicrobial in the Hospital NAPS dataset (2013-2021), accounting for 5.7 % (n = 14,197) of all antimicrobial prescriptions (n = 250,863). The proportion of metronidazole prescriptions declined by 2 % from 2013 to 2021 (p < 0.001). The most common indications were surgical prophylaxis (15.3 %), diverticulitis (9.4 %), aspiration pneumonia (7.3 %). Over half (53.5 %) of metronidazole prescriptions were deemed compliant with prescribing guidelines and 67.8 % were deemed appropriate. These rates were comparatively lower than the overall results of all antimicrobials. The primary documented reason for inappropriateness was that the spectrum was too broad (34.2 %). Surgical prophylaxis had the lowest rates of guideline compliance (53.8 %) and appropriateness (54.3 %).
CONCLUSIONS: Metronidazole remains widely used in Australian hospitals with suboptimal rates of guideline compliance and appropriateness. A noted area for improvement that we identified was using metronidazole when its spectrum was too broad, possibly when anaerobic therapy is unnecessary. With increasing international adoption of the Hospital NAPS programme, future comparative studies will be critical to identify global trends of antimicrobial prescribing quality. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes have proven to be effective in improving prescribing quality and should be considered to specifically target improvements in metronidazole prescribing.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the results of a clinical guideline for the treatment and early discharge of patients with complicated acute appendicitis in terms of infectious complications and hospital stay.
METHODS: A guideline for appendicitis treatment according to severity was created. Complicated appendicitis cases were treated with ceftriaxone-metronidazole for 48h, with discharge being approved if certain clinical and blood test criteria were met. A retrospective analytical study comparing the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) and surgical site infection (SSI) in patients under 14 years of age to whom the new guideline was applied (Group A) vs. the historical cohort (Group B, treated with gentamicin-metronidazole for 5 days) was carried out. A prospective cohort study to assess which antibiotic therapy (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid or cefuroxime-metronidazole) proved more effective in patients meeting early discharge criteria was also conducted.
RESULTS: 205 patients under 14 years of age were included in Group A, whereas 109 patients were included in Group B. IAA was present in 14.3% of patients from Group A vs. 13.8% from Group B (p= 0.83), while SSI was present in 1.9% of patients from Group A vs. 8.25% from Group B (p= 0.008). Early discharge criteria were met by 62.7% of patients from Group A. Median hospital stay decreased from 6 to 3 days. At discharge, 57% of patients received amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, whereas 43% received cefuroxime-metronidazole, with no differences being found in terms of SSI (p= 0.24) or IAA (p= 0.12).
CONCLUSIONS: Early discharge reduces hospital stay without increasing the risk of postoperative infectious complications. Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid is a safe option for at-home oral antibiotic therapy.
OBJECTIVE: El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar los resultados en términos de complicaciones infecciosas y estancia hospitalaria de la instauración de una guía clínica para el tratamiento y alta precoz en pacientes con apendicitis aguda complicada.
METHODS: Se elaboró una guía para el tratamiento de las apendicitis en función de su grado de severidad. Las complicadas se trataron con ceftriaxona-metronidazol durante 48 h, siendo alta si cumplen ciertos criterios clínicos y analíticos. Se realizó un estudio analítico retrospectivo comparando la incidencia de abscesos intraabdominales postquirúrgicos (AIA) e infección del sitio quirúrgico (ISQ) en pacientes menores de 14 años sometidos a la nueva guía (Grupo A), respecto a una cohorte histórica (Grupo B), en la que la pauta de tratamiento era gentamicina-metronidazol 5 días. Además, se realizó un estudio de cohortes prospectivas para evaluar qué antibioterapia (amocilina-clavulánico o cefuroxima-metronidazol) es más eficaz en los pacientes que cumplen criterios de alta precoz.
RESULTS: Se incluyeron 205 pacientes menores de 14 años en el Grupo A y 109 en el Grupo B. Presentaron AIA un 14,3% en el grupo A, frente al 13,8% en el B (p=  0,83); e ISQ un 1,9% y un 8,25% respectivamente (p=  0,008). Cumplieron criterios de alta precoz el 62,7% de los pacientes del Grupo A. La mediana de estancia disminuyó a de 6 a 3 días. Al alta, el 57% recibieron amoxicilina-clavulánico y el 43% cefuroxima-metronidazol, sin hallarse diferencias en términos de ISQ (p=  0,24) ni de AIA (p=  0,12).
CONCLUSIONS: El alta precoz disminuye la estancia hospitalaria sin aumentar el riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas postquirúrgicas. La amoxicilina-clavulánico es una opción segura para la antibioterapia oral domiciliaria.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) remains a significant clinical challenge both in the management of severe and severe-complicated disease and the prevention of recurrence. Guidelines released by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (IDSA/SHEA) and ESCMID had some consensus as well as some discrepancies in disease severity classification and treatment recommendations. We review and compare the key clinical strategies from updated IDSA/SHEA, ESCMID and current Australasian guidelines for CDI management in adults and discuss relevant issues for clinicians, particularly in the management of severe-complicated infection. Updated IDSA/SHEA and ESCMID guidelines now reflect the increased efficacy of fidaxomicin in preventing recurrence and have both promoted fidaxomicin to first-line therapy with an initial CDI episode in both non-severe and severe disease and endorsed the role of bezlotoxumab in the prevention of recurrent infection. Vancomycin remains acceptable therapy and metronidazole is not preferred. For severe-complicated infection the IDSA/SHEA recommends high-dose oral ± rectal vancomycin and IV metronidazole, whilst in an important development, ESCMID has endorsed fidaxomicin and tigecycline as part of combination anti-CDI therapy, for the first time. The role of faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in second CDI recurrence is now clearer, but timing and mode of FMT in severe-complicated refractory disease still requires further study.

UNASSIGNED: The 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (IDSA/SHEA) Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile infection (CDI) guideline update recommended treatment with fidaxomicin or vancomycin for CDI. We aimed to examine outpatient CDI treatment utilization before and after the guideline update and compare clinical outcomes associated with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin use.
UNASSIGNED: A pre-post study design was employed using Medicare data. CDI treatment utilization and clinical outcomes (4- and 8-week sustained response, CDI recurrence) were compared between patients indexed from April-September 2017 (preguideline period) and those indexed from April-September 2018 (postguideline period). Clinical outcomes associated with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin were compared using propensity score-matched analyses.
UNASSIGNED: From the pre- to postguideline period, metronidazole use decreased (initial CDI: 81.2% to 53.5%; recurrent CDI: 49.7% to 27.6%) while vancomycin (initial CDI: 17.9% to 44.9%; recurrent CDI: 48.1% to 66.4%) and fidaxomicin (initial CDI: 0.87% to 1.63%; recurrent CDI: 2.2% to 6.0%) use increased significantly (P < .001 for all). However, clinical outcomes did not improve. In propensity score-matched analyses, fidaxomicin versus vancomycin users had 4-week sustained response rates that were higher by 13.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0%-22.9%; P = .0058) and 30.0% (95% CI, 16.8%-44.3%; P = .0002) in initial and recurrent CDI cohorts, respectively. Recurrence rates were numerically lower for fidaxomicin in both cohorts.
UNASSIGNED: Vancomycin use increased and metronidazole use decreased after the 2017 guideline update. Fidaxomicin use increased but remained low. Improved outcomes associated with fidaxomicin relative to vancomycin suggest benefits from its greater use in Medicare patients.

The eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori globally are decreasing with a dramatic increase in the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria all over the world, including Saudi Arabia. There is no current consensus on the management of H. pylori in Saudi Arabia. The Saudi Gastroenterology Association developed these practice guidelines after reviewing the local and regional studies on the management of H. pylori. The aim was to establish recommendations to guide healthcare providers in managing H. pylori in Saudi Arabia. Experts in the areas of H. pylori management and microbiology were invited to write these guidelines. A literature search was performed, and all authors participated in writing and reviewing the guidelines. In addition, international guidelines and consensus reports were reviewed to bridge the gap in knowledge when local and regional data were unavailable. There is limited local data on treatment of H. pylori. The rate of clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance is high; therefore, standard triple therapy for 10-14 days is no longer recommended in the treatment of H. pylori unless antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed. Based on the available data, bismuth quadruple therapy for 10-14 days is considered the best first-line and second-line therapy. Culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing should be considered following two treatment failures. These recommendations are intended to provide the most relevant evidence-based guidelines for the management of H. pylori infection in Saudi Arabia. The working group recommends further studies to explore more therapeutic options to eradicate H. pylori.

This updated and upgraded S2k guideline deals with the diagnosis and treatment of rosacea, which is a common, chronic inflammatory skin disease mostly affecting the face. Initially, rosacea is characterized by recurrent erythema, telangiectasia and flushing. Later, the inflammatory component predominates, with persistent erythema with follicular papules, papulopustules and pustules. The development of phyma, which usually occurs on the acral localizations, is the most severe manifestation. For the treatment of rosacea, the interdisciplinary guideline committee, with representatives of the German Dermatological Society (DDG), the Professional Association of German Dermatologists (BVDD), the German Opthalmological Society (DOG), the Society for Dermopharmacy (GD), the Swiss Society for Dermatology and Venereology (SGDV) and the German Rosacea Aid e. V., recommends the avoidance of trigger factors and topical applications of metronidazole, azelaic acid or ivermectin. For symptomatic treatment of persistent centrofacial erythema, the topical vasoconstrictors brimonidine or oxymetazoline can also be used. Systemic therapy is recommended for therapy-resistant and severe forms of rosacea papulopustulosa. The drug of choice is low-dose doxycycline. Alternatively, low-dose isotretinoin can be recommended. Ocular rosacea should be treated with lid margin hygiene. For topical treatment, ciclosporin eye drops, azithromycin, ivermectin or metronidazole are suggested.

The main goal of periodontology is to prevent and arrest gingivitis and periodontitis to avoid tooth loss and focal infection of periodontal origin. Periodontal scaling or flap surgery of moderate-to-severe periodontitis have shortcomings, most likely because removal of herpesviruses and bacterial pathogens in deep periodontal lesions and the adjacent inflamed gingiva requires systemic antimicrobial treatment (or gingivectomy). Valacyclovir (1000 mg twice daily on day 1, and 500 mg twice daily on day 2 and on day 3) is a potent anti-herpesvirus agent. Antibiotic combinations against bacterial pathogens include amoxicillin-metronidazole (250 mg of each, thrice daily for 4 days; for systemically healthy adults) and ciprofloxacin-metronidazole (500 mg of each, twice daily for 4 days; for immunosuppressed individuals and patients exposed to contaminated water and poor sanitation). Supportive antiseptic treatment may consist of 0.1%-0.2% sodium hypochlorite (regular household bleach) as cooling spray in ultrasonic scalers, flosser fluid in oral irrigators, and mouthrinse in patient self-care. The anti-infective treatment described here helps control cases of severe periodontitis and constitutes an exceedingly inexpensive alternative to conventional (mechanical) periodontal therapy.