■基于自然的社会处方(NBSP)是一种改善心理健康结果的方法,涉及将基于自然的干预措施作为传统干预措施的补充或替代疗法。NBSP为希望提高心理健康的人提供各种优势。基于自然的社会处方(NBSP)的效果大小尚未通过系统评价和荟萃分析进行全面评估。
■本研究旨在分析现有研究并进行荟萃分析,以确定基于自然的社会处方(NBSP)结果对心理健康的总体影响大小。
■通过从现有的论文中选择相关论文,本研究进行了荟萃分析.对电子数据库的系统搜索(PubMed,WebofScience,Scopus,科克伦图书馆,Embase,CINAHL,和PsychINFO)进行了相关研究。如果他们评估NBSP对心理健康结果的影响,则纳入研究。使用随机效应模型计算效应大小。
■干预统计的荟萃分析显示,CBT(SMD-0.0035;95%CI:[-0.5090;0.5020];Tau^2:0.1011;Tau:0.318),数字干预(SMD-0.3654;95%CI:[-0.5258;1.2566];Tau^2:0.2976,Tau:0.5455),音乐干预(SMD-2.1281;95%CI:[-0.4659;4.7221];Tau^2:3.4046;Tau:1.8452),和心理干预(SMD-0.8529;95%CI:[0.3051;1.4007];Tau^2:0.1224;Tau:0.3499)没有显著影响。其他干预措施[社会归属感,沟通培训,蓝色干预,基于自然的教育,认知行为团体治疗(CBGT),社会处方协调员,自助干预,参与性,组织干预,住院服务,简短的饮食,基于互联网的干预,产前干预,瑜伽和冥想,人体工程学培训计划,瑜伽nidra干预,和讲故事]上面强调的意义重大。
■荟萃分析的结论支持以下观点:将基于自然的社会处方干预措施纳入精神保健计划可以有效地补充传统疗法并改善精神健康结果。
■https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/prospro/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023412458,CRD42023412458。
A nature-based social prescription (NBSP) is an approach to improving mental health outcomes that involves prescribing nature-based interventions as complementary or alternative therapy to traditional ones. A variety of advantages are available from NBSP for people looking to enhance their mental well-being. The effect size of the nature-based social prescriptions (NBSPs) has not been thoroughly evaluated by systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
The current study aimed to analyze existing studies and conduct a meta-analysis to determine the overall effect size of the nature-based social prescriptions (NBSP\'s) outcomes on mental health.
By choosing the relevant papers from among those that were available, a meta-analysis was carried out in the current study. A systematic search of electronic databases (Pub Med, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO) was conducted to identify relevant studies. Studies were included if they evaluated the effects of NBSP on mental health outcomes. Effect sizes were calculated using the random effects model.
Meta-analysis of interventions statistics shows that CBT (SMD -0.0035; 95% CI: [-0.5090; 0.5020]; Tau^2: 0.1011; Tau: 0.318), digital intervention (SMD -0.3654; 95% CI: [-0.5258; 1.2566]; Tau^2: 0.2976, Tau: 0.5455), music intervention (SMD -2.1281; 95% CI: [-0.4659; 4.7221]; Tau^2: 3.4046; Tau:1.8452), and psychological interventions (SMD -0.8529; 95% CI: [0.3051; 1.4007]; Tau^2: 0.1224; Tau: 0.3499) do not significantly impact. The other interventions [social belongingness, communication training, blue intervention, nature-based education, cognitive behavior group therapy (CBGT), social prescribing coordinator, self-help intervention, participatory, organizational intervention, inpatient services, brief diet, internet-based intervention, prenatal intervention, yoga and
meditation, ergonomics training program, yoga nidra intervention, and storytelling] highlighted above are significant.
The conclusion of the meta-analysis supports the idea that incorporating nature-based social prescription interventions into mental healthcare plans can effectively complement traditional therapies and improve mental health outcomes.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023412458, CRD42023412458.