Meditation

冥想
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肥胖会导致许多身体和精神疾病。这项研究比较了基于正念的饮食意识训练(MB-EAT)与MB-EAT加实施意向模型对体重指数(BMI)的有效性,体重自我效能,BMI≤25(n=52)的肥胖女性的体力活动。
    方法:在这项随机临床试验中,采用简单随机抽样方法选择参与者,随机分为3组.对实验组I进行了每次150分钟的12个疗程的MB-EAT,实验组II仅接受了MB-EAT的身体活动计划和MB-EAT加实施意向;同时,将两组与对照组进行比较.数据由量表测量,一份问卷,还有一份检查表,P值基于广义估计方程(GEE)检验的结果。P<0.001被认为是显著性水平。
    结果:两个实验组BMI的MB-EAT和MB-EAT+实施意向有效性,体重自我效能,体力活动与对照组有显著差异。在综合组与MB-EAT组中,BMI,身体活动,和身体不适,比体重自我效能量表更有效。两个干预组对BMI均有效,体重自我效能,和身体活动,但综合组的效率更高。
    结论:MB-EAT有效性试验是基于理论的,减轻体重以及超重和肥胖成年人的心理和行为后果。MB-EAT+实施意向模型是根据每个人的具体情况计划定期和每日锻炼。
    背景:试验注册号:(IRCT20200919048767N1)。
    BACKGROUND: Obesity causes many physical and mental illnesses. This study compares mindfulness-based eating awareness training (MB-EAT) versus MB-EAT plus implementation intention model for effectiveness on body mass index (BMI), weight self-efficacy, and physical activity in obese women with BMIs ≤ 25 (n = 52).
    METHODS: In this randomized clinical trial, the participants were selected by the simple random sampling method and randomly divided into three groups. A 12-session MB-EAT of 150 min per session was performed for experimental group I. The experimental group II received MB-EAT alone for physical activity planning and MB-EAT plus implementation intention; also, both groups were compared to the control group. Data were measured by the scales, a questionnaire, and a checklist, and the P-values are based on the results of the generalized estimating equation (GEE) test. P < 0.001 were considered the significance level.
    RESULTS: The MB-EAT and MB-EAT + implementation intention effectiveness on the two experimental groups\' BMI, weight self-efficacy, and physical activity was significantly different from the control group. In the integrated group versus the MB-EAT group, BMI, physical activity, and physical discomfort, were more effective than the weight self-efficacy subscales. Both intervention groups were effective on BMI, weight self-efficacy, and physical activity, but the integrated group\'s effectiveness was more.
    CONCLUSIONS: The MB-EAT effectiveness trial is theory-based, reducing weight and the psychological and behavioral consequences of overweight and obese adults. The MB-EAT + the Implementation intention model is to plan regular and daily exercise according to each individual\'s specific circumstances.
    BACKGROUND: The trial registration number: (IRCT20200919048767N1).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管许多神经影像学研究已经评估了基于正念的干预期间前额叶皮层的变化,这些研究中的大多数是对熟练参与者的横断面研究,或者涉及单次研究前后的前后比较.虽然功能近红外光谱是一个有用的工具来捕获在持续正念干预期间前额叶皮层的血液动力学反应的变化,目前尚不清楚其检测持续正念干预累积效应的能力.我们调查了基于12周在线正念的干预是否在口头流利任务中改变了前额叶皮层的血液动力学反应。82名健康大学生被随机分配到12周的基于在线正念的干预组或等待名单对照组。将干预前后使用功能近红外光谱测得的氧合血红蛋白积分值与等待列表组的值进行比较。干预条件显示出比对照条件明显更大的功能性近红外光谱信号激活;然而,干预前后的效应大小较小.因此,持续的基于正念的干预可以改变前额叶皮质功能,和功能近红外光谱可用于测量基于持续正念的干预措施的累积效果。通过更好地理解正念和功能性近红外光谱信号之间的关联,功能近红外光谱可用于生物反馈分析。
    Although many neuroimaging studies have evaluated changes in the prefrontal cortex during mindfulness-based interventions, most of these studies were cross-sectional studies of skilled participants or involved pre-post comparisons before and after a single session. While functional near-infrared spectroscopy is a useful tool to capture changes in the hemodynamic response of the prefrontal cortex during continuous mindfulness-based intervention, its ability to detect the accumulated effects of continuous mindfulness-based intervention is currently unclear. We investigated whether a 12-wk online mindfulness-based intervention changed the hemodynamic response of the prefrontal cortex during a verbal fluency task. Eighty-two healthy university students were randomly allocated to a 12-wk online mindfulness-based intervention group or a wait-list control group. The integral values of oxygenated hemoglobin measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy before and after the intervention were compared to the values in the wait-list group. The intervention condition showed significantly greater functional near-infrared spectroscopy signal activation than the control condition; however, the effect sizes before and after the intervention were small. Thus, continuous mindfulness-based intervention could alter prefrontal cortex function, and functional near-infrared spectroscopy could be useful for measuring the accumulated effects of continuous mindfulness-based interventions. With a better understanding of the association between mindfulness and functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals, functional near-infrared spectroscopy can be used for biofeedback analyses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于正念,面对面的项目可以有效地减轻压力,增强军事和民用样本的弹性,然而,很少有研究检查或比较通过实时提供的培训,互动社交媒体。这样的计划将具有更广泛的范围,并且可能包括那些无法亲自参加的人。也有兴趣解决关于正念训练对个体差异变量的影响的歧义,比如自我同情。
    这项研究的目的是比较三种干预措施的前/后自我同情;基于正念的减压术(IP),通过虚拟世界(VW)提供正念冥想训练,以及现役军人和退伍军人中的候补控制小组(CG)。
    A2(前/后)×3(组)阶乘设计是由250名现役和退伍军人组成的,以自我同情措施为因变量。
    IP组的自我同情心提高了10%,大众组提高了14%,而CG组没有改善。联合治疗组的自我同情心改善了10.3%,而CG没有变化,并且具有组×时间交互作用(p<0.01)。初始自我同情较低的参与者比基线自我同情较高的参与者获得更大的益处(p<0.01)。
    IP和大众正念冥想训练在增加自我同情方面同样有效。添加有效的在线正念传递将促进更广泛的受众的自我同情,可能会产生更好的应对,信心,连通性,快乐,稳定,和自我满足,在减轻焦虑的同时,对失败的恐惧,参与者之间的压力。
    UNASSIGNED: Mindfulness-based, in-person programs are effective at reducing stress and enhancing resilience in military and civilian samples, yet few studies have examined or compared training offered via real-time, interactive social media. Such a program would have a wider-reach and could include those unable to attend in-person. There is also interest in resolving ambiguity about the effects of mindfulness training on individual difference variables, such as self-compassion.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this research was to compare pre/post self-compassion for three interventions; Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction delivered in-person (IP), mindfulness meditation training delivered via a Virtual World (VW), and a wait-list Control Group (CG) among active duty and veteran U.S. military.
    UNASSIGNED: A 2 (pre/post)×3 (group) factorial design was conducted with 250 active duty and veteran U.S. Military service members, with self-compassion measures as dependent variables.
    UNASSIGNED: Self Compassion improved 10% for the IP group and 14% for the VW group, while the CG group did not improve. Combined treatment groups yielded a 10.3% improvement in self-compassion compared with no change in the CG and with a group×time interaction effect (p < 0.01). Participants with lower initial self-compassion experienced greater benefits than those with higher baseline self-compassion (p < 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: IP and VW Mindfulness Meditation training were equally effective in increasing self-compassion. Adding effective on-line mindfulness delivery will promote self-compassion among a more extensive audience, likely yielding improved coping, confidence, connectedness, cheerfulness, steadiness, and self-satisfaction, while lessening anxiety, fear-of-failure, and stress among participants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与普通人群和其他学生群体相比,医学基础年(FY)医生表现出更大的心理困扰。这项可行性研究调查了FY医生对正念的看法以及正念韧性和有效性训练(MRET)计划对压力的影响,幸福,和性能。
    方法:混合方法研究使用问卷调查(研究1,N=144)和MRET计划的pre-post分析设计(研究2,N=13),以及焦点小组(N=7)。
    结果:在研究1中,有28.5%的FY报告使用正念。所有五个正念方面都很重要,积极的,与心理健康相关(p<0.05)。意识(AA)和非反应性(NR)显著,与对压力的挑战反应呈正相关(p<0.05)。威胁和损失评估与AA呈负相关,NR,和非判断性(p<0.01)。感知生产力与正念方面呈正相关:描述,AA,和NR(p<0.001)。在研究2中,健康和正念方面的观察显着增加,描述,AA,NR,威胁评估下降(p<0.05)。焦点小组确定的主要主题包括重塑心态,基于价值观的行动,体现领导力和教育学。
    结论:正念之间存在关系,心理健康,和在财政年度的表现。MRETprorgamme改善了心理健康并减少了威胁评估。未来的工作可以集中资源来提高AA和NR的技能,因为这可能足以带来有意义的福祉改善,压力生活事件的生产力和认知重估。
    BACKGROUND: Medical Foundation Year (FY) doctors demonstrate greater psychological distress compared with the general population and other student groups. This feasibility study investigated FY doctors\' perceptions of mindfulness and the impact of a mindful resilience and effectiveness training (MRET) programme on stress, wellbeing, and performance.
    METHODS: Mixed-methods study utilising a questionnaire (study 1, N = 144) and a pre-post analysis design of MRET programme (study 2, N = 13), along with focus groups (N = 7).
    RESULTS: In study 1 28.5% of FY\'s reported using mindfulness. All five mindfulness facets were significantly, and positively, associated with mental wellbeing (p < 0.05). Acting with awareness (AA) and non-reactivity (NR) were significantly, positively associated with a challenge responses to stress (p < 0.05). Threat and loss appraisals were negatively associated with AA, NR, and non-judging (p < 0.01). Perceived productivity was positively associated with mindfulness facets: describing, AA, and NR (p < 0.001). In study 2, there were significant increases in wellbeing and mindfulness facets observing, describing, AA, and NR, and threat appraisals decreased (p < 0.05). The main themes identified across the focus group included Reframed Mindset, Values-Based Action, Embodied Leadership and Pedagogy.
    CONCLUSIONS: There exists a relationship between mindfulness, psychological wellbeing, and performance in FYs. The MRET prorgamme improved psychological wellbeing and reduced threat appraisals. Future work could focus resources on enhancing the skills of AA and NR, as this may be sufficient to bring about meaningful improvements in wellbeing, percieved productivity and cognitive reappraisal of stressful life events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:这项次要分析使用来自随机对照试验(RCT)的数据,将Mantram重复计划(MRP)与以当前为中心的治疗(PCT)在创伤后退伍军人中进行比较,检查了作为临床结果潜在调节者的正念意识的五个方面压力障碍(PTSD)。方法:从173名与军事相关的创伤后应激障碍的退伍军人中收集数据,随机分配接受8次MRP(n=89)或PCT(n=84)。临床医生管理和自我报告的正念措施(五方面正念问卷[FFMQ]),创伤后应激障碍严重程度,失眠症状,和抑郁症状,并在干预前后获得。分层回归用于测试FFMQ对两个治疗组的临床结果的适度。结果:对于那些“描述他们的内部经验”能力更强的人(+1个标准差[SD]),MRP与干预后的PTSD过度觉醒症状低于PCT相关(p<0.001)。对于那些“对内部刺激不反应性”较低的人(-1SD),与PCT相比,MRP与PTSD回避和麻木症状以及失眠的减少有关(所有ps<0.002)。结论:与PCT受试者相比,“描述”和“对内部经验的非反应性”的干预前正念域差异预测了MRP的PTSD和失眠症状的改善。FFMQ可能是预测患者对基于正念的干预的准备的重要工具,比如MRP。
    Objectives: This secondary analysis examined five facets of mindful awareness as potential moderators of clinical outcomes using data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that compared Mantram Repetition Program (MRP) with present-centered therapy (PCT) in veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Methods: Data were examined from 173 veterans with military-related PTSD randomly assigned to receive eight sessions of MRP (n = 89) or PCT (n = 84). Clinician-administered and self-report measures of mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire [FFMQ]), PTSD severity, insomnia symptoms, and depression symptoms, and were obtained pre- and post-intervention. Hierarchical regressions were used to test for FFMQ moderation on clinical outcomes within the two treatment groups. Results: For those with greater ability to \"describe their internal experience\" (+1 standard deviation [SD]), MRP was associated with lower PTSD hyperarousal symptoms post-intervention than PCT (p < 0.001). For those with lower \"nonreactivity to internal stimuli\" (-1 SD), MRP was associated with greater reductions in PTSD avoidance and numbing symptoms and insomnia compared with PCT (all ps < 0.002). Conclusions: Pre-intervention mindfulness domains of \"describe\" and \"nonreactivity to inner experience\" differentially predicted improvements in PTSD and insomnia symptoms for MRP as compared with PCT subjects. The FFMQ may be an important tool for predicting patient preparedness for mindfulness-based interventions, such as MRP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    介绍我们的研究旨在将冥想和基于同情心的团体治疗与饮食失调患者的护理标准进行比较,毒瘾,酒精成瘾,和抑郁症,关于接受,正念意识,自我同情,和心理困扰。方法采用设计对照研究,将冥想和以同情心为中心的团体疗法与单独的护理标准进行比较,饮食失调患者,毒瘾,酒精成瘾,和情绪障碍。进行了四份经过验证的问卷:接受和行动问卷-II(AAQ-II),评估与当前时刻完全接触的能力;正念注意意识量表(MAAS),它评估有意识地体验当下正在发生的事情的能力;自我同情量表(SCS),评估自我同情的特征,包括爱心;和症状清单-90(SCL-90),衡量心理困扰(焦虑,抑郁症,精神病行为,等。).结果共有75名受试者,其中48人代表实验组,和27代表对照组。受试者的总体平均年龄为44.8±13.2岁。实验组有统计学上的显着增加(基线与研究结束)用于AAQ-II,MAAS,和SCS分数,SCL-90评分有统计学意义的下降。在对照组中,SCL-90评分有统计学上的显著下降,但其他测量没有显著差异。在研究结束时,两组之间的比较如下:AAQ-II:0.7(-5.74至7.15),p=0.827;MAAS:4.78(-3.19至12.75),p=0.233;SCS:5.89(-3.18至14.96),p=0.199;SCL-90:-0.26(-0.62至0.1),p=0.157。结论实验组内,所有量表均有统计学显著改善。在研究结束时,两组之间的四个量表没有统计学上的显着差异。组间比较受数据可用性的限制。
    Introduction Our study aimed to compare meditation and compassion-based group therapy with the standard of care in patients with eating disorders, drug addiction, alcohol addiction, and depression, concerning acceptance, mindfulness awareness, self-compassion, and psychological distress. Methods A controlled designed study was performed, comparing meditation and compassion-focused group therapy added to the standard of care with the standard of care alone, on patients with eating disorders, drug addiction, alcohol addiction, and mood disorders. Four validated questionnaires were administered: the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), which assesses the ability to be fully in touch with the present moment; the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), which assesses the ability to experience consciously what is happening in the present moment; the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS), which assesses self-compassion characteristics, including loving-kindness; and the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90), which measures psychological distress (anxiety, depression, psychotic behavior, etc.). Results There was a total of 75 subjects, out of which 48 represented the experimental group, and 27 represented the control group. The overall mean age of the subjects was 44.8 ± 13.2 years. There were statistically significant increases in the experimental group (baseline vs. end of study) for the AAQ-II, MAAS, and SCS scores, and a statistically significant decrease in the SCL-90 score. In the control group, there was a statistically significant decrease in the SCL-90 score, but no significant differences for other measurements. The comparisons between the two groups at the end of the study were as follows: AAQ-II: 0.7 (-5.74 to 7.15), p = 0.827; MAAS: 4.78 (-3.19 to 12.75), p = 0.233; SCS: 5.89 (-3.18 to 14.96), p = 0.199; SCL-90: -0.26 (-0.62 to 0.1), p = 0.157. Conclusion Within the experimental group, all scales improved statistically significantly. There were no statistically significant differences at the end of the study concerning the four scales between the groups. The comparison between groups was limited by data availability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于长时间的旅程以及他们在船上的工作性质,水手们会感到焦虑和睡眠障碍。早期的研究表明,循环冥想(CM)有利于管理焦虑和改善睡眠质量。因此,本研究旨在调查CM对水手焦虑和睡眠质量的影响。
    将50名水手分配到实验组(n=25)和对照组(n=25)。实验组接受45minCM,每周7天,共3周。对照组继续进行常规活动,并在接下来的3周内进行CM练习。在基线和3周结束时,采用汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)进行睡眠以及血压和脉搏率。使用重复测量方差分析(RMANOVA)分析组内和组间效应的数据。
    在3周后,两组之间的所有变量均存在显着差异。实验组显示出减少的焦虑(p<0.001)和改善的睡眠(p<0.001)以及血压和脉搏率的改善。对照组在3周后未显示任何显著变化。
    CM可以作为水手在船上期间管理焦虑和改善睡眠质量的例行公事。
    UNASSIGNED: Sailors undergo anxiety and sleep disturbances due to prolonged journeys and the nature of their work on ships. Earlier studies indicate Cyclic Meditation (CM) being beneficial for managing anxiety and improving sleep quality. Thus, the current study was designed to investigate the effect of CM on anxiety and sleep quality among sailors.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty sailors were assigned to experimental (n = 25) and control (n = 25) groups. The experimental group received 45 min of CM, 7 days a week for 3 weeks. Control group continued with their routine activities and were offered CM practice the following 3 weeks. Hamilton Anxiety Scale for anxiety (HAM-A) and the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) for sleep along with blood pressure and pulse rate were taken at baseline and by the end of 3 weeks. Data were analyzed using Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (RM ANOVA) for within and between group effects.
    UNASSIGNED: Significant differences were found between the groups following 3 weeks for all the variables. Experimental group demonstrated reduced anxiety (p < 0.001) and improved sleep (p < 0.001) along with improvements in blood pressure and pulse rate. The control group did not show any significant changes following 3 weeks.
    UNASSIGNED: CM could be incorporated as a routine for sailors to manage their anxiety and improve sleep quality during the period on board ships.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于正念的计划(MBP)已显示出对心理健康的有益影响。有新的证据表明,MBP也可能与清醒意识的主观体验中的明显偏差有关。我们旨在探讨MBPs是否在不同类型的此类状态中具有因果作用。
    方法:我们进行了一项实用的随机对照试验(ACTRN12615001160527)。剑桥大学没有严重精神疾病的学生被随机接受为期8周的MBP和心理健康支持(SAU)。或者单独去SAU。我们改编了意识状态改变量表(OAV,0-100点范围)以评估日常生活中的自发经历,并在为期一年的随访问卷结束时将其作为事后次要结果。两部分模型分析比较了试验组,以及一年中正式(冥想)和非正式(日常活动)正念练习的剂量反应效应。进行了校正多重比较的敏感性分析。
    结果:我们随机分配了670名参与者;205(33%)完成了OAV。与SAU相比,MBP参与者更频繁和更密集地经历团结(两部分边际效应(ME)=6.26OAV量表点,95%置信区间(CI)=2.24,10.27,p=0.006,Cohen\sd=0.33)和反施舍更频繁(ME=4.84,95%CI=0.86,8.83,p=0.019,Cohen\sd=0.26)。正式实践预言了精神,幸福和团结的经历,洞察力,具体化,改变了含义。非正式实践预示着团结和幸福的经历。在对多重比较进行校正后,试验臂比较和非正式练习效果失去了意义,但正式实践剂量反应效应仍然显著。
    结论:结果提供了正念练习与特定意识状态改变之间因果关系的新建议。为了优化他们的影响,从业者和教师需要适当地预测和处理它们。未来的研究需要确认发现并评估机制和临床意义。
    BACKGROUND: Mindfulness-based programmes (MBPs) have shown beneficial effects on mental health. There is emerging evidence that MBPs may also be associated with marked deviations in the subjective experience of waking consciousness. We aimed to explore whether MBPs can have a causal role in different types of such states.
    METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (ACTRN12615001160527). University of Cambridge students without severe mental illness were randomised to an 8-week MBP plus mental health support as usual (SAU), or to SAU alone. We adapted the Altered States of Consciousness Rating Scale (OAV, 0-100-point range) to assess spontaneous experiences in daily life, and included it as a post-hoc secondary outcome at the end of the one-year follow-up questionnaire. Two-part model analyses compared trial arms, and estimated dose-response effects of formal (meditation) and informal (daily activities) mindfulness practice during the year. Sensitivity analyses correcting for multiple comparisons were conducted.
    RESULTS: We randomised 670 participants; 205 (33%) completed the OAV. In comparison with SAU, MBP participants experienced unity more frequently and intensively (two-part marginal effect (ME) = 6.26 OAV scale points, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.24, 10.27, p = 0.006, Cohen\'s d = 0.33) and disembodiment more frequently (ME = 4.84, 95% CI = 0.86, 8.83, p = 0.019, Cohen\'s d = 0.26). Formal practice predicted spiritual, blissful and unity experiences, insightfulness, disembodiment, and changed meanings. Informal practice predicted unity and blissful experiences. Trial arm comparisons and informal practice effects lost significance after corrections for multiple comparisons, but formal practice dose-response effects remained significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: Results provide a novel suggestion of causal links between mindfulness practice and specific altered states of consciousness. To optimise their impact, practitioners and teachers need to anticipate and handle them appropriately. Future studies need to confirm findings and assess mechanisms and clinical implications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:工人的心理健康问题给日本的公司造成了巨大的损失。然而,由于时间限制,工人被认为获得心理支持的机会有限,这使得他们很难进行面对面的心理支持干预。
    目的:这项研究旨在提出一项干预方案,该方案描述了一项随机对照试验,以检查智能手机应用程序提供的简短指导正念冥想(MM)或自我同情冥想(SCM)是否对工人的心理健康和与工作相关的结果有效。
    方法:这是一个开放标签,3臂随机对照试验。参与者将通过相关网站的公开电话会议招募,纳入标准如下:(1)每周工作超过20小时的员工,(2)年龄在18至54岁之间,(3)没有请假,(4)不是企业主或学生,(5)目前未被诊断患有精神障碍,并且Kessler心理困扰量表-6评分低于13分。我们将包括200名参与者,并将他们随机分配到SCM课程(n=67),MM课程(n=67),和一个等待名单组(n=66)。将指示干预组(SCM和MM)进行日常指导自助,自我同情,MMs每天持续6-12分钟,超过4周。主要结果将包括心理困扰和工作表现,次要结果将包括躯体症状,认知灵活性,自尊,自我同情,感知压力,幸福,情绪调节,工作参与,愤怒,心理安全,和创造力。所有程序均由东京大学伦理委员会批准(22-326)。所有参与者将通过网站被告知研究,书面知情同意书将通过基于网络的表格收集。
    结果:参与者的招募始于2022年12月,干预始于2023年1月。截至2023年9月,共有375名参与者注册。干预和数据收集于2023年10月下旬完成。
    结论:这项研究将有助于开发有效的自我护理干预内容,从而改善心理健康,工作表现,和相关的结果,并在面对痛苦时促进正念和自我同情的态度。
    背景:大学医院医疗信息网络临床试验注册UMIN000049466;https://tinyurl.com/23x8m8nf。
    DERR1-10.2196/53541。
    BACKGROUND: Mental health problems among workers cause enormous losses to companies in Japan. However, workers have been considered to have limited access to psychological support because of time constraints, which makes it difficult for them to engage in face-to-face psychological support interventions.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to present an intervention protocol that describes a randomized controlled trial to examine whether brief guided mindfulness meditation (MM) or self-compassion meditation (SCM) provided by a smartphone app is effective for mental health and work-related outcomes among workers.
    METHODS: This is an open-label, 3-arm randomized controlled trial. The participants will be recruited through an open call on relevant websites with the following inclusion criteria: (1) employees who are working more than 20 hours per week, (2) between the ages of 18 and 54 years, (3) not on a leave of absence, (4) not business owners or students, and (5) not currently diagnosed with a mental disorder and have a Kessler Psychological Distress Scale-6 score below 13 points. We will include 200 participants and randomly assign them to an SCM course (n=67), an MM course (n=67), and a waitlist group (n=66). The intervention groups (SCM and MM) will be instructed to engage in daily guided self-help, self-compassion, and MMs lasting 6-12 minutes per day over 4 weeks. Primary outcomes will include psychological distress and job performance, and secondary outcomes will include somatic symptoms, cognitive flexibility, self-esteem, self-compassion, perceived stress, well-being, emotion regulation, work engagement, anger, psychological safety, and creativity. All procedures were approved by the ethics committee of the University of Tokyo (22-326). All participants will be informed of the study via the websites, and written informed consent will be collected via web-based forms.
    RESULTS: The recruitment of participants began in December 2022, and the intervention began in January 2023. As of September 2023, a total of 375 participants have been enrolled. The intervention and data collection were completed in late October 2023.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study will contribute to the development of effective self-care intervention content that will improve mental health, work performance, and related outcomes and promote mindful and self-compassionate attitudes when faced with distress.
    BACKGROUND: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry UMIN000049466; https://tinyurl.com/23x8m8nf.
    UNASSIGNED: DERR1-10.2196/53541.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管广泛参与沉思的宗教活动,关于它们对福祉的潜在影响的研究相对较少。此外,很少有研究关注明确的宗教框架如何影响这种做法的结果。在这项在线随机对照试验中(N=702),我们测试了一个沉思的祈祷练习的福祉影响,称为中心祈祷对自我识别的基督徒。我们比较了1)以明确的宗教框架(实验条件)呈现实践,2)在没有明确宗教框架的情况下展示实践(主动控制),3)出示简单的指示,以反映当天的情况,没有任何关于冥想式练习(被动控制)的指示。在随机分为这三个条件之一后,参与者被要求每天完成他们指定的练习,共28天.我们假设这种做法的宗教框架版本将在主动和被动控制条件下增加幸福感。在三个随访时间点评估了幸福感:一天,一个星期,在练习期后一个月。我们在干预后一周的主要预后指标上没有发现两组之间的差异。从基线到随访,每组的幸福感都有所增加。我们发现在精神体验的急性测量上存在显著的群体差异,神秘体验问卷(MEQ-30)和日常精神体验问卷(DSES)。这些结果表明,宗教框架可能不会增强幸福感,但会改变与沉思实践有关的精神结果。
    Despite widespread engagement in contemplative religious practices, comparatively little research has been conducted on their potential effects on well-being. Furthermore, few studies have focused on how an explicitly religious framing may impact the outcomes of such practices. In this online randomized controlled trial (N = 702), we tested the well-being effects of a contemplative prayer practice called Centering Prayer on self-identifying Christians. We compared 1) presenting the practice with an explicitly religious framing (experimental condition), 2) presenting the practice without an explicitly religious framing (active control), and 3) presenting simple instructions to reflect on the day, without any instructions regarding a meditation-like practice (passive control). After randomization into one of these three conditions, participants were asked to complete their assigned practice daily for 28 days. We hypothesized that the religious framing version of the practice would increase well-being over the active and passive control conditions. Well-being was assessed at three follow-up time points: one day, one week, and one month after the practice period. We found no group differences between the conditions on our primary outcome measure of well-being at one-week post-intervention. Each group increased in well-being from baseline to follow-up. We found significant group differences on acute measures of spiritual experience, the Mystical Experience Questionnaire (MEQ-30) and Daily Spiritual Experience Questionnaire (DSES). These results suggest that a religious framing may not enhance well-being effects but may alter spiritual outcomes related to contemplative practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号