MDMA

MDMA
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经典迷幻药和MDMA有丰富多彩的娱乐使用历史,两者最近都被重新评估为治疗精神疾病的工具。已经进行了几项研究来评估定期使用对认知的潜在长期影响,为迷幻药和摇头丸提供不同的结果。然而,迄今为止,在这些物质的急性影响期间,关于认知表现的知识很少。在这篇系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们研究了在急性药物作用和亚急性("余辉")窗口期间,迷幻药和MDMA对认知功能的影响.我们的定量分析表明,与MDMA相比,迷幻药会对急性认知表现产生不同的影响:迷幻药会损害注意力和执行功能,而MDMA主要影响记忆,让执行功能和注意力不受影响。我们的定性分析表明,在迷幻药的急性作用消退后至少24小时内,执行功能和创造力可能会增加,而MDMA没有观察到这样的结果。我们的发现可能有助于为娱乐环境提供减少伤害的建议,并有助于在治疗框架内促进使用迷幻药和MDMA的不同方法。
    Classic psychedelics and MDMA have a colorful history of recreational use, and both have recently been re-evaluated as tools for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Several studies have been carried out to assess potential long-term effects of a regular use on cognition, delivering distinct results for psychedelics and MDMA. However, to date knowledge is scarce on cognitive performance during acute effects of those substances. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigate how cognitive functioning is affected by psychedelics and MDMA during the acute drug effects and the sub-acute (\"afterglow\") window. Our quantitative analyses suggest that acute cognitive performance is differentially affected by psychedelics when compared to MDMA: psychedelics impair attention and executive function, whereas MDMA primarily affects memory, leaving executive functions and attention unaffected. Our qualitative analyses reveal that executive functioning and creativity may be increased during a window of at least 24 h after the acute effects of psychedelics have subsided, whereas no such results have been observed for MDMA. Our findings may contribute to inform recommendations on harm reduction for recreational settings and to help fostering differential approaches for the use of psychedelics and MDMA within a therapeutic framework.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当前对迷幻药的研究引起了强烈的兴趣,特别是关于他们在治疗精神健康障碍方面的潜力。各种研究表明,迷幻药产生的主观效果与其治疗效果之间存在联系。神经影像学证据表明,大脑功能连接的变化与迷幻药的主观影响有关。我们对迷幻药和大脑功能连接进行了综述。该评论集中于四种迷幻药:ayahuasca,psilocybin和LSD,和entactogenMDMA。我们在MEDLINE数据库中进行了搜索,Embase,APAPsycInfo和Scopus从成立到2023年6月,通过与功能连接和迷幻药相关的关键字。使用PRISMA框架,我们从492篇初始文章中选择了24篇文章进行分析.这项范围审查和分析调查了迷幻药对健康个体的主观体验和大脑功能连接的影响。这些研究通过心理测量量表量化了主观效果,揭示了意识改变的重要经验,情绪提升,和迷幻药诱导的神秘经历。神经影像学结果显示迷幻药的功能连接改变,在默认模式网络中连通性降低,感觉和丘脑皮质连通性增加的物质之间发现一致。注意到这些神经生理变化与主观体验之间的相关性,暗示了迷幻药神经心理学影响的大脑网络基础。虽然综述的结果提供了迷幻药主观效应的潜在神经机制,需要直接的临床证据来推进其临床结局.我们的研究为进一步探索迷幻药的治疗潜力奠定了基础。
    Intense interest surrounds current research on psychedelics, particularly regarding their potential in treating mental health disorders. Various studies suggest a link between the subjective effects produced by psychedelics and their therapeutic efficacy. Neuroimaging evidence indicates an association of changes in brain functional connectivity with the subjective effects of psychedelics. We conducted a review focusing on psychedelics and brain functional connectivity. The review focused on four psychedelic drugs: ayahuasca, psilocybin and LSD, and the entactogen MDMA. We conducted searches in databases of MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo and Scopus from inception to Jun 2023 by keywords related to functional connectivity and psychedelics. Using the PRISMA framework, we selected 24 articles from an initial pool of 492 for analysis. This scoping review and analysis investigated the effects of psychedelics on subjective experiences and brain functional connectivity in healthy individuals. The studies quantified subjective effects through psychometric scales, revealing significant experiences of altered consciousness, mood elevation, and mystical experiences induced by psychedelics. Neuroimaging results indicated alterations in the functional connectivity of psychedelics, with consistent findings across substances of decreased connectivity within the default mode network and increased sensory and thalamocortical connectivity. Correlations between these neurophysiological changes and subjective experiences were noted, suggesting a brain network basis of the psychedelics\' neuropsychological impact. While the result of the review provides a potential neural mechanism of the subjective effects of psychedelics, direct clinical evidence is needed to advance their clinical outcomes. Our research serves as a foundation for further exploration of the therapeutic potential of psychedelics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,随机疗法的复苏,使用非经典迷幻药(例如3,4-甲基二氧基甲基苯丙胺[MDMA])的安慰剂对照试验(RCT),和经典的迷幻药(例如psilocybin,麦角酰二乙胺[LSD],N,N-二甲基色胺[DMT/ayahuasca])与辅助治疗(AT)联合治疗精神疾病。迷幻AT中一个值得注意的方法论挑战,然而,是盲法程序的复杂性。缺乏有效的致盲可能会引入相当大的响应偏差,降低内部有效性,并妥协参与者的保留。本系统综述研究了使用迷幻药和安慰剂治疗精神疾病的RCT的设计和致盲技术。这项工作的目的是确定可能为进行迷幻药研究的未来RTC设计提供信息的因素。我们对PubMed进行了系统回顾,MEDLINE,CINAHL,Cochrane中央对照试验登记册(中央),Psycinfo,Embase,和WebofScience核心合集进行检查:(1)安慰剂选择,(2)研究设计,(3)盲法措施的完整性。16种出版物被确定为符合系统审查的标准。我们的发现表明,传统的安慰剂给药不足以控制预期混淆。因此,在设计涉及迷幻药的前瞻性临床研究时,限制人员脱盲和使用活性安慰剂的实验方法学是重要考虑因素.
    Recent years have seen a resurgence in randomized, placebo controlled trials (RCTs) utilizing non-classical psychedelics (e.g. 3,4-methyl enedioxy methamphetamine [MDMA]), and classical psychedelics (e.g. psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide [LSD], and N,N-dimethyltryptamine [DMT/ayahuasca]) in conjunction with assisted therapy (AT) for psychiatric disorders. A notable methodological challenge in psychedelic AT, however, is the complexity of blinding procedures. The lack of efficacious blinding can introduce considerable response bias, reduce internal validity, and compromise participant retention. This systematic review examines design and blinding techniques in RCTs utilizing psychedelics and placebo for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. The aim of this work is to identify factors that may inform future RTC design for conducting psychedelics research. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Psycinfo, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection to examine: (1) placebo selection, (2) study design, and (3) integrity of blinding measures. Sixteen publications were identified as meeting the criteria for a systematic review. Our findings suggest that traditional placebo administration is insufficient to control for expectancy confounds. Consequently, experimental methodology that limits personnel unblinding and the use of an active placebo are important considerations when designing prospective clinical studies involving psychedelics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在对健康人和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)或重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者中迷幻药的神经认知效应进行药理学研究。
    方法:系统审查的首选报告项目(PRISMA)被用作本审查的结构和报告结果的指南。文献检索包括MEDLINE数据库,直至2022年12月。我们纳入了MDMA的随机或开放标签人体研究,psilocybin,mescaline,LSD,DMT,或大麻报告非情绪带电的神经认知结果(“冷认知”)通过验证的神经心理学测试测量。
    结果:关于MDMA的全文共43篇(15篇),大麻(12),LSD(6),psilocybin(9),DMT/ayahuasca(1),包括mescaline(0),主要是健康的科目。纳入了一篇关于MDMA对PTSD受试者认知影响的文章;没有关于MDD中迷幻药和神经认知的研究。大多数关于健康受试者的研究报告了在迷幻药的峰值效应期间对认知的有害或中性影响,但有少数例外(例如,MDMA改善精神运动功能)。神经认知维度类型的表现(例如,注意,记忆,执行功能,精神运动)因迷幻类型而异,剂量,和认知测试。
    结论:小样本和缺乏统一方法的研究排除了关于迷幻药是否增强的明确结论,减少,或者对认知表现没有显著影响。可以预见,迷幻药将很快成为各种精神疾病的可用治疗方法。应该在未来的研究中评估迷幻药对认知的急性和长期影响。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide an overview of pharmacological trials that examine the neurocognitive effects of psychedelics among healthy individuals and patients with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or major depressive disorder (MDD).
    METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) was used as a guide to structure and report the findings for this review. A literature search included the MEDLINE database up until December 2022. We included randomized or open-label human studies of MDMA, psilocybin, mescaline, LSD, DMT, or cannabis reporting non-emotionally charged neurocognitive outcomes (\"cold cognition\") measured through validated neuropsychological tests.
    RESULTS: A total of 43 full-text papers on MDMA (15), cannabis (12), LSD (6), psilocybin (9), DMT/ayahuasca (1), and mescaline (0) were included, mostly on healthy subjects. A single article on MDMA\'s effects on cognition in subjects with PTSD was included; there were no studies on psychedelics and neurocognition in MDD. Most of the studies on healthy subjects reported detrimental or neutral effects on cognition during the peak effect of psychedelics with a few exceptions (e.g., MDMA improved psychomotor function). Performance on the type of neurocognitive dimension (e.g., attention, memory, executive function, psychomotor) varies by type of psychedelic, dosage, and cognitive testing.
    CONCLUSIONS: Small samples and a lack of uniformed methods across studies preclude unequivocal conclusions on whether psychedelics enhance, decrease, or have no significant effect on cognitive performance. It is foreseen that psychedelics will soon become an available treatment for various psychiatric disorders. The acute and long-term effects on cognition caused by psychedelics should be assessed in future studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近对迷幻药的潜在治疗作用的兴趣导致对其对脑内分子信号通路的影响的研究。
    对该领域不同研究的综合回顾和分析。
    在包括Embase在内的国际数据库中进行了系统搜索,Scopus,WebofScience,和PubMed从成立到2023年7月9日。资格标准包括已发表和同行评审的研究,这些研究评估了迷幻药食用后脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)水平的变化。
    本研究共纳入9项研究。荟萃分析表明,与健康对照组相比,迷幻药消费者的BDNF水平明显更高,合并的标准化平均差为0.26(95%CI:0.10-0.42,I2=38.51%,p<0.001)。留一法分析表明,去除个体迷幻药后,结果具有稳健性。没有观察到显著的发表偏倚。结果强调了迷幻药通过改变BDNF水平对神经可塑性的潜在影响。
    更准确地说,有记录的BDNF水平升高表明迷幻药可以增强突触可塑性并促进神经元生长的神经生物学机制。鉴于有关此主题的可用数据有限,结论仍然不确定。因此,我们强烈建议更多的研究更广泛的样本量,以在这一领域产生更可靠的证据。
    UNASSIGNED: Recent interest in the potential therapeutic effects of psychedelics has led to investigations into their influence on molecular signaling pathways within the brain.
    UNASSIGNED: Integrated review and analysis of different studies in this field.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic search was conducted across international databases including Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed from inception to 9 July 2023. Eligibility criteria encompassed published and peer-reviewed studies evaluating changes in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels after psychedelic consumption.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of nine studies were included in our study. The meta-analysis demonstrated significantly higher BDNF levels in psychedelic consumers compared to healthy controls, with a pooled standardized mean difference of 0.26 (95% CI: 0.10-0.42, I2 = 38.51%, p < 0.001). Leave-one-out analysis indicated robustness in results upon removal of individual psychedelics. No significant publication bias was observed. The results highlight the potential influence of psychedelics on neuroplasticity by altering BDNF levels.
    UNASSIGNED: More precisely, the documented rise in BDNF levels indicates a neurobiological mechanism by which psychedelics could enhance synaptic plasticity and foster the growth of neurons. Given the limited data available on this topic, the conclusions remain uncertain. Consequently, we highly recommend additional research with more extensive sample sizes to yield more reliable evidence in this field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:单胺类神经递质在攻击中发挥作用,特别是当被非法物质改变时。然而,一些文献表明,并非所有非法物质都可能导致侵略,尤其是迷幻药。这篇叙述性综述调查了5-羟色胺能迷幻药与MDMA对攻击行为的关联。
    方法:搜索PubMed和PsycINFO的原件,同行评审的文章使用系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,评估5-羟色胺能迷幻药和3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)对暴力和攻击行为的影响.
    结果:删除重复项之后,共筛选了555篇文章,16人符合纳入标准。通过参考筛选获得了另一篇文章,使文章总数达到17篇。在这17篇文章中,14项研究集中在MDMA上,3项研究集中在5-羟色胺能迷幻药上。调查结果好坏参半,一些结果表明迷幻药后的攻击性增加,另一些则表明有保护作用。当前文献中的局限性包括迷幻药的各种定义,缺乏标准化的客观结果衡量标准,以及因混淆而无法控制。
    结论:随着迷幻研究的不断扩大,需要进一步评估5-羟色胺能迷幻药和MDMA对攻击行为的影响.
    OBJECTIVE: Monoamine neurotransmitters play a role in aggression, especially when altered by illicit substances. However, some literature suggests that not all illicit substances may lead to aggression, notably psychedelics. This narrative review investigates the associations between serotonergic psychedelics and MDMA on aggressive behaviour.
    METHODS: PubMed and PsycINFO were searched for original, peer-reviewed articles evaluating the effects of serotonergic psychedelics and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) on violent and aggressive behavior using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
    RESULTS: After removing duplicates, a total of 555 articles were screened, with 16 meeting the inclusion criteria. One additional article was obtained through reference screening bringing the total to 17 articles. Of these 17 articles, 14 studies focused on MDMA and three on serotonergic psychedelics. Findings were mixed, with some results demonstrating increased aggression following psychedelics and others suggesting protective effects. Limitations in the current literature include varied definitions of psychedelics, lack of standardized objective outcome measures, and failure to control for confounding.
    CONCLUSIONS: As psychedelic research continues to expand, further assessment on the effects of serotonergic psychedelics and MDMA on aggressive behavior is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    迷幻化合物已经被人类用于药用几个世纪,宗教,和部落的目的。从21世纪初开始并持续到今天的临床试验数据表明,迷幻药是各种神经和精神疾病的临床有效治疗方法。然而,所有检查这些物质的临床试验都排除了任何具有过去或当前癫痫发作史的个体,留下一大群癫痫和非癫痫慢性癫痫发作障碍患者,没有任何地方转向迷幻药辅助治疗。尽管有任何重要证据表明临床监督使用迷幻药会导致或加剧该人群的癫痫发作,但仍进行了这些排除。迄今为止,尚无临床试验或临床前癫痫发作模型证明迷幻药可诱发癫痫发作.这篇综述重点介绍了几例使用迷幻药后出现癫痫发作或癫痫发作缓解的个体,总体趋势是迷幻药在受控环境中使用是安全的,监督临床设置。我们还提出了该领域未来的研究方向。
    Psychedelic compounds have been utilized by humans for centuries for medicinal, religious, and tribal purposes. Clinical trial data starting from the early 2000s and continuing today indicates that psychedelics are a clinically efficacious treatment for a variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders. However, all clinical trials examining these substances have excluded any individual with a past or current history of seizures, leaving a large cohort of epilepsy and non-epilepsy chronic seizure disorder patients without anywhere to turn for psychedelic-assisted therapy. These exclusions were made despite any significant evidence that clinically supervised psychedelic use causes or exacerbates seizures in this population. To date, no clinical trial or preclinical seizure model has demonstrated that psychedelics induce seizures. This review highlights several cases of individuals experiencing seizures or seizure remission following psychedelic use, with the overall trend being that psychedelics are safe for use in a controlled, supervised clinical setting. We also suggest future research directions for this field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    对迷幻辅助疗法的临床兴趣不断增长,导致了涉及psilocybin的第二波研究,麦角酰二乙胺(LSD),3,4-亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)和其他物质。数据表明,这些化合物有可能治疗在老年人中特别普遍的心理健康状况,如抑郁症。焦虑,存在的痛苦,和创伤后应激障碍。
    这项研究的目的是量化参加迷幻临床试验的老年人的患病率,并探索该人群的安全性数据。
    根据2020年PRISMA指南进行了系统评价。搜索标准包括所有以英文发表的使用迷幻药物治疗精神病的试验,包括成瘾以及与严重疾病相关的生存困扰。文章是从PubMed上的文献检索中确定的,EBSCO,和EMBASE。
    确定了4376份手稿,其中505人有资格进一步审查,36人最终符合资格标准。在这36项研究的1400名患者中,只有19人被确定为65岁或以上,占所有试验参与者的不到1.4%。对于这19名老年人中的10名,获得了详细的安全性数据.任何老年人均未发生严重不良事件(AE),仅发生与焦虑相关的短暂轻度至中度AE。肠胃不适,在迷幻药给药期间报告了高血压。
    虽然老年人的现有数据有限,这表明迷幻药辅助心理治疗在老年人中是安全且耐受性良好的.因此,应该更严格地研究迷幻辅助心理治疗对这一人群精神病的治疗。
    Growing clinical interest in psychedelic-assisted therapies has led to a second wave of research involving psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and other substances. Data suggests that these compounds have the potential to treat mental health conditions that are especially prevalent in older adults such as depression, anxiety, existential distress, and posttraumatic stress disorder.
    The goal of this study was to quantify the prevalence of older adults enrolled in psychedelic clinical trials and explore safety data in this population.
    A systematic review was conducted following the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Search criteria included all trials published in English using psychedelic substances to treat psychiatric conditions, including addiction as well as existential distress related to serious illness. Articles were identified from literature searches on PubMed, EBSCO, and EMBASE.
    4376 manuscripts were identified, of which 505 qualified for further review, with 36 eventually meeting eligibility criteria. Of the 1400 patients enrolled in the 36 studies, only 19 were identified as 65 or older, representing less than 1.4% of all trial participants. For 10 of these 19 older adults, detailed safety data was obtained. No serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in any older adults and only transient mild-to-moderate AEs related to anxiety, gastrointestinal upset, and hypertension were reported during the psychedelic dosing sessions.
    While existing data in older adults is limited, it suggests that psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy can be safe and well tolerated in older adults. Therefore, psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy should be more rigorously investigated for the treatment of psychiatric conditions in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:性健康,整体福祉的一个组成部分,经常因常见但未被诊断的性功能障碍而受损。传统的干预措施包括药物和心理治疗。非常规疗法,像MDMA,为性功能障碍提供希望。本文综述了MDMA对性反应的影响及其在治疗性功能障碍中的潜在作用。
    目的:本综述的目的是阐明MDMA对女性和男性性反应周期不同领域的影响。
    方法:我们对MDMA对女性和男性性反应周期的每个领域的影响进行了系统评价。PubMed,MEDLINE,EMBASE被询问,使用PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南筛选结果。使用的搜索词是“MDMA”或“摇头丸”与“欲望”的组合,\"\"唤醒,\"\"润滑,\"\"高潮,\"\"的乐趣,\“\”性欲,\"\"勃起,“和”射精。“本综述的纳入标准是研究对象使用MDMA,并描述和测量了女性和/或男性性反应周期的至少一个领域的性结局。随机对照试验,队列研究(前瞻性和回顾性),调查,并纳入了2000年1月至2022年6月之间发表的文献综述。未解决感兴趣条件的病例报告和研究被排除在分析之外。筛选出重复的搜索结果。然后阅读全文,以确保它们符合分析的纳入和排除标准。
    结果:我们确定了181项研究,其中6符合女性性反应周期评估标准,8符合男性性反应周期评估标准.6项研究中有4项报告女性使用MDMA会增加性欲。在4项研究中,有3项使用MDMA改善了唤醒和润滑,但在1项随机对照研究中未受影响。在男人中,7项研究评估了MDMA对欲望和/或唤醒的影响,5项研究测量了对勃起的影响,3关于性高潮,射精2.60%的基于访谈的研究报告说男性的性欲增加,而40%的人报告混合或没有效果。两项研究报告勃起受损,2个报告的混合效应,1人报告害怕勃起障碍。在男人和女人中,所有评估性高潮的研究都报告了性高潮的延迟,但如果达到性高潮,则会增加强度和愉悦。主要结果指标是可变的,并且主要是定性的。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,MDMA通常会增加性欲,并在达到性高潮时增强性高潮。在提供有关两性性唤起的相互矛盾的证据时,MDMA可能损害男性的勃起和射精功能。
    Sexual health, an integral component of overall well-being, is frequently compromised by common yet underdiagnosed sexual dysfunctions. Traditional interventions encompass pharmaceutical and psychological treatments. Unconventional therapies, like MDMA, offer hope for sexual dysfunction. This review delves into MDMA\'s effects on sexual responsiveness and its potential role in treating sexual dysfunction.
    The purpose of this review is to elucidate effects of MDMA on different domains of the female and male sexual response cycles.
    We conducted a systematic review on the effects of MDMA on each domain of the female and male sexual response cycles. PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were queried, and results were screened using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Search terms utilized were \"MDMA\" or \"ecstasy\" in combination with \"desire,\" \"arousal,\" \"lubrication,\" \"orgasm,\" \"pleasure,\" \"libido,\" \"erection,\" and \"ejaculation.\" Inclusion criteria for this review were MDMA use by study subjects and sexual outcomes in at least 1 domain of the female and/or male sexual response cycles were described and measured. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies (both prospective and retrospective), surveys, and literature reviews published between January 2000 and June 2022 were included. Case reports and studies that did not address conditions of interest were excluded from analysis. Duplicated search results were screened out. The remaining studies were then read in full text to ensure they met inclusion and exclusion criteria for analysis.
    We identified 181 studies, of which 6 met criteria for assessment of the female sexual response cycle and 8 met criteria for assessment of the male sexual response cycle. Four of 6 studies reported increased sexual desire with MDMA use among women. Arousal and lubrication were improved with MDMA use in 3 of 4 studies, but they were not affected in 1 randomized control study. In men, 7 studies evaluated the effects of MDMA on desire and/or arousal, 5 studies measured impact on erection, 3 on orgasm, and 2 on ejaculation. Sixty percent of interview-based studies reported increased sexual desire in men, while 40% reported mixed or no effect. Two studies reported impairment of erection, 2 reported mixed effects, and 1 reported fear of erection impairment. In both men and women, all studies evaluating orgasm reported delay in achieving orgasm but increased intensity and pleasure if achieved. Primary outcome measures were variable and largely qualitative.
    Our findings suggest that MDMA generally increases sexual desire and intensifies orgasm when achieved. While producing conflicting evidence on sexual arousal in both sexes, MDMA may impair erectile and ejaculatory function in men.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    大麻使用障碍(CUD)在美国约2-5%的成年人中普遍存在,并且随着大麻限制的减少和大麻产品中四氢大麻酚(THC)含量的增加,预计会增加。目前尚无FDA批准的CUD药物,尽管有数十种重新用途和新药的试验。迷幻药作为其他物质使用障碍的治疗类已经引起了人们的兴趣,自我报告调查表明,他们可能会导致CUD的积极结果。在这里,我们回顾了现有的关于在有CUD或有CUD风险的人群中使用迷幻药的文献,并考虑了作为CUD治疗基础的潜在理由.
    在多个数据库中进行了系统搜索。纳入标准是报告在人类受试者中使用迷幻药或相关物质和CUD进行治疗的主要研究。排除标准是包括迷幻药或相关物质的结果,而大麻使用或与CUD相关的风险没有变化。
    返回了三百五个独特的结果。在CUD中使用非经典迷幻氯胺酮鉴定了一篇文章;根据其次要数据或对机制的考虑,将三篇文章确定为局部相关。出于背景目的,对其他文章进行了审查,审查安全考虑因素,并制定理由。
    关于在CUD患者中使用迷幻药的数据和报告有限,考虑到CUD发病率的预期增加和对迷幻药物使用的兴趣增加,还需要更多的研究。虽然迷幻药,广泛地说,有较高的治疗指数与罕见的严重不良反应,在CUD人群中处于危险之中的特别不利影响,如精神病和心血管事件,应该考虑。探讨了迷幻药在CUD中具有治疗潜力的可能机制。
    UNASSIGNED: Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is prevalent in ~2-5% of adults in the United States and is anticipated to increase as restrictions to cannabis decrease and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) content in cannabis products increase. No FDA-approved medications for CUD are currently available, despite trials of dozens of re-purposed and novel drugs. Psychedelics have garnered interest as a therapeutic class in other substance use disorders, and self-report surveys suggest they may result in positive outcomes for CUD. Herein, we review the existing literature pertaining to psychedelic use in persons with or at risk for CUD and consider the potential rationale underpinning psychedelics as a treatment for CUD.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic search was performed in several databases. Inclusion criteria were primary research reporting use of psychedelics or related substances and CUD for treatment in human subjects. Exclusion criteria were results including psychedelics or related substances without changes in cannabis use or risks associated with CUD.
    UNASSIGNED: Three hundred and five unique results were returned. One article was identified using the non-classical psychedelic ketamine in CUD; three articles were identified as topically relevant based on their secondary data or consideration of mechanism. Additional articles were reviewed for purposes of background, review of safety considerations, and formulating rationale.
    UNASSIGNED: Limited data and reporting are available on the use of psychedelics in persons with CUD, and more research is needed given the anticipated increase in CUD incidence and increasing interest in psychedelic use. While psychedelics, broadly, have a high therapeutic index with infrequent serious adverse effects, particular adverse effects at risk in the CUD population, such as psychosis and cardiovascular events, should be considered. Possible mechanisms by which psychedelics have therapeutic potential in CUD are explored.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号