Intrauterine Devices

宫内节育器
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    尽管子宫穿孔是一种罕见但严重的并发症,宫内节育器是全球流行和有效的避孕方法。
    我院收治一名76岁女性患者,表现为阴道渗漏和下腹部不适。诊断成像发现膀胱阴道瘘和膀胱结石,可归因于四十年前插入的宫内节育器穿孔。患者接受了开放手术进行膀胱结石切除和膀胱阴道瘘修复。
    如果使用宫内节育器的患者抱怨膀胱结石或持续的下尿路症状,器械引起的膀胱穿孔在鉴别诊断中应考虑。
    UNASSIGNED: Although uterine perforation is a rare but serious complication, intrauterine devices are globally popular and effective contraceptive methods.
    UNASSIGNED: A 76-year-old female patient manifesting symptoms of vaginal leakage and lower abdominal discomfort was admitted to our hospital. Diagnostic imaging identified a vesicovaginal fistula and bladder calculi attributable to perforation of the bladder by an intrauterine device that had been inserted over four decades ago. The patient underwent open surgery for cystolith removal and vesicovaginal fistula repair.
    UNASSIGNED: If a patient with an intrauterine device complains of bladder stones or ongoing lower urinary tract symptoms, bladder perforation caused by the device should be considered in the differential diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: News
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在大多数西方国家,医疗保健费用的上涨是一个主要问题。替代医疗保健是一种战略方法,旨在降低成本,同时在患者住所附近提供医疗服务。一个说明性实例涉及将门诊医院护理迁移到初级护理设置。值得注意的是,在初级保健环境中可以安全地插入宫内节育器(IUD).为了建立宫内节育器替代率的务实目标,我们对与插入宫内节育器有关的医疗替代的地区差异进行了评估.此外,我们调查了一级和二级医疗保健环境在随访超声和宫内节育器再插入方面的差异.
    方法:所有在2016年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间在荷兰初级保健(由全科医生和助产士)和二级保健(由医院医生)接受宫内节育器插入的妇女纳入研究。主要结果指标是按护理环境在区域一级按病例混合调整的IUD插入率,以及需要在三个月内进行随访超声和IUD重新插入的比例。
    结果:在840,766个IUD放置中,74%的人被安置在初级保健中,26%被安置在二级保健中。初级保健的比例从2016年的70%增加到2020年的77%。在区域之间观察到的替代率范围为58%至82%。与初级保健专业人员相比,那些接受二级保健的人进行了更多的超声检查以验证宫内节育器的放置(23%与3%;p值<0.01)和三个月内更多的宫内节育器重插(6%vs.2%;p值<0.01)。
    结论:宫内节育器越来越多地插入荷兰的初级保健中,区域IUD插入护理替代率峰值≥80%。IUD插入护理替代初级保健似乎与在三个月内进行超声随访或IUD重新插入的妇女人数显着减少有关。
    BACKGROUND: Rising health care costs are a major concern in most Western countries. The substitution of healthcare stands as a strategic approach aimed at mitigating costs while offering medical services in proximity to patients\' residences. An illustrative instance involves the migration of outpatient hospital care to primary care settings. Notably, the insertion of intrauterine devices (IUDs) can be safely executed within primary care contexts. In order to establish a pragmatic objective for the rate of IUD substitution, we conducted an evaluation of regional disparities in healthcare substitution pertaining to the insertion of intrauterine devices. Furthermore, we investigated disparities in the follow-up ultrasound and reinsertion of IUDs between primary and secondary healthcare environments.
    METHODS: All women who underwent IUD insertion in Dutch primary care (by general practitioners and midwives) and secondary care (by hospital physicians) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020 were included. The main outcome measures were the case-mix adjusted IUD insertion rates at the regional level by care setting and the proportions requiring follow-up ultrasound and IUD reinsertion within three months.
    RESULTS: Of the 840,766 IUD placements, 74% were inserted in primary care and 26% in secondary care. The proportion inserted in primary care increased from 70% in 2016 to 77% in 2020. The observed substitution rate ranged from 58 to 82% between regions. Compared with health care professionals in primary care, those in secondary care performed more ultrasounds to verify IUD placement (23% vs. 3%; p-value < 0.01) and more IUD reinsertions within three months (6% vs. 2%; p-value < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: IUDs are increasingly being inserted in Dutch primary care, with peak regional IUD insertion care substitution rates at ≥ 80%. IUD insertion care substitution to primary care appears to be associated with significantly fewer women having follow-up ultrasound or IUD reinsertion within three months.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估使用左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器(LNG-IUD)对青少年和年轻女性痤疮发生率的影响。
    在PubMed中进行了叙述性审查,Embase,科克伦,和SciELO评估使用LNG-IUD的青少年和年轻女性的痤疮发生率(13.5或19.5毫克,或52毫克)。队列,横断面研究,临床试验,并纳入荟萃分析,没有日期限制。没有评估感兴趣年龄女性的研究被排除在外。只选择了英文文章。
    这篇叙述性综述包括9篇文章。只有临床试验,队列研究,和横断面研究进行了评估。两项横断面研究评估了使用任何避孕方法的女性痤疮的发生率,在一项研究中,使用液化天然气宫内节育器的17至47岁女性中痤疮的发生率为36%。在另一项研究中,在使用任何避孕方法的女性中,痤疮的发病率为2%至8%,年轻女性和液化天然气宫内节育器使用者的比率更高。痤疮的发生率各不相同,16至35岁的参与者更有可能报告新的痤疮或先前存在的痤疮恶化。在一项16至24岁女性的前瞻性队列研究中,痤疮是一种常见的不良反应,第一年为44%。
    数据表明,液化天然气宫内节育器使用者的痤疮发生率存在差异,在年轻女性中观察到较高的患病率。进一步的研究应该集中在液化天然气宫内节育器对年轻人群痤疮的影响,严格的研究设计和以前使用避孕药具的考虑。
    释放左炔诺孕酮的宫内节育器(LNG-IUD)是预防青少年和年轻女性意外怀孕的重要工具。痤疮是可能导致该方法停止的可能的不利影响。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the impact of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) use on the incidence of acne in adolescents and young women.
    UNASSIGNED: A narrative review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and SciELO assessing the incidence of acne in adolescents and young women using LNG-IUD (13.5, or 19.5 mg, or 52 mg). Cohort, cross-sectional studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses were included, without a date limit. Studies that didn\'t evaluate women in the age of interest were excluded. Only articles in English were selected.
    UNASSIGNED: Nine articles were included in this narrative review. Only clinical trials, cohort studies, and cross-sectional studies were evaluated. Two cross-sectional studies evaluated the incidence of acne in women using any contraceptive methods, with the incidence of acne being 36% in women aged 17 to 47 using LNG-IUD in one study. In another study, acne incidence ranged from 2 to 8% in women using any contraceptive methods, with higher rates in younger women and LNG-IUD users. The incidence of acne varies and participants between 16 to 35 years were more likely to report new acne or worsening of pre-existing acne. In a prospective cohort study of women between 16 and 24 years, acne was a common adverse effect, with 44% in the first year.
    UNASSIGNED: The data indicate variability in the incidence of acne among LNG-IUD users, with a higher prevalence observed in younger women. Further research should focus on the effects of LNG-IUD on acne in young populations, with rigorous study designs and consideration of previous contraceptive use.
    The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) is an important tool in the prevention of unplanned pregnancies in adolescents and young women. Acne is a possible adverse effect that could lead to discontinuation of the method.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:妇女在出生后的12个月内特别容易意外怀孕。在产妇环境中改善获得产后避孕的机会可以防止意外和紧密间隔的分娩,改善母亲和孩子的健康。本文将总结产后避孕(PPC)的最新研究,建立在这一领域现有的知识和发展的基础上。
    结果:目前的产后避孕药具供应模式可能无法充分满足妇女的需求。COVID-19大流行导致产后避孕药具供应发生变化,越来越重视产妇服务。产前避孕讨论与产后避孕计划的增加和出生后方法的吸收有关。数字健康干预可能是支持避孕信息的有用工具。最有效的长效可逆避孕(LARC)方法,例如宫内节育器(IUD)和植入物,由于训练有素的提供者的可用性,在产妇环境中提供可能是具有挑战性的。产后宫内节育器插入相对未得到充分利用,尽管有证据支持它的安全性,功效和成本效益。
    结论:产前信息需要与出生后立即获得全方位的方法合作,以减少PPC摄取的障碍。产妇提供者的培训和教育对于成功实施PPC服务至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: Women are particularly vulnerable to unintended pregnancy in the 12 months following a birth. Improving access to postpartum contraception within maternity settings can prevent unintended and closely spaced births, improving the health of mother and child. This review will summarize the recent research in postpartum contraception (PPC), building on existing knowledge and developments in this field.
    RESULTS: Current models of postpartum contraceptive provision may not adequately meet women\'s needs. The COVID-19 pandemic led to changes in postpartum contraceptive provision, with an increasing emphasis placed on maternity services. Antenatal contraceptive discussion is associated with increased postpartum contraceptive planning and uptake of methods after birth. Digital health interventions may be a useful tool to support information about contraception. The most effective long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods, such as the intrauterine device (IUD) and implant, can be challenging to provide in the maternity setting because of availability of trained providers. Postpartum IUD insertion remains relatively under-utilized, despite evidence supporting its safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
    CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal information needs to be partnered with access to the full range of methods immediately after birth to reduce barriers to PPC uptake. Training and education of maternity providers is central to successful implementation of PPC services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19大流行影响了全球获得卫生服务的机会,包括避孕。我们试图探索大流行对南非和赞比亚计划生育(FP)服务提供和使用的影响,包括植入和宫内节育器(IUD)用户的愿望和能力获得移除。方法:在2020年8月至2021年4月之间,我们对537名参与正在进行的纵向避孕延续研究的妇女进行了调查。我们还对参与FP提供的39名调查参与者和36名关键线人进行了深入访谈。我们对调查答复进行了描述性分析,对访谈进行了主题分析。结果:随着COVID-19的出现,该样本中避孕药具的使用变化最小。自流行病开始以来,不到一半的妇女(n=220)报告试图使用FP,其中绝大多数使用短效方法。在那些寻求服务的人中,95%获得了他们首选的方法。在赞比亚,在大流行开始之前和之后不使用一种方法的妇女比例没有变化(31%);在南非,比例从8%上升到10%。在这两个国家中,不到7%的植入物或宫内节育器使用者报告想要移除。在寻求驱逐的人中(n=22),91%(n=10)在赞比亚和55%(n=6)在南非胜利获得去除。在定性采访中,有挑战获得FP服务的女性提到排长队,取消避孕服务的优先次序,缺乏交通,缺货,以及担心在设施感染COVID-19。关键线人报告了缺货,尤其是注射剂,和员工短缺作为障碍。结论:在该样本中,我们没有发现COVID-19对避孕方法的实质性影响;然而,提供者和其他参与提供服务的人发现了护理连续性的风险。随着COVID-19大流行的减弱,它仍然是重要的监测人们的能力,以获得他们的首选避孕方法。
    Background: The COVID-19 pandemic affected global access to health services, including contraception. We sought to explore effects of the pandemic on family planning (FP) service provision and use in South Africa and Zambia, including on implant and intrauterine device (IUD) users\' desire and ability to obtain removal. Methods: Between August 2020 and April 2021, we conducted surveys with 537 women participating in an ongoing longitudinal contraceptive continuation study. We also carried out in-depth interviews with 39 of the survey participants and 36 key informants involved in FP provision. We conducted descriptive analysis of survey responses and thematic analysis of interviews. Results: Contraceptive use changed minimally in this sample with the emergence of COVID-19. Fewer than half of women (n=220) reported attempting to access FP since the start of the pandemic, the vast majority of whom were using short-acting methods. Among those who sought services, 95% obtained their preferred method. The proportion of women not using a method before and after pandemic start did not change in Zambia (31%); in South Africa, the proportion increased from 8% to 10%. Less than 7% of implant or IUD users in either country reported wanting removal. Among those who sought removal (n=22), 91% (n=10) in Zambia and 55% (n=6) in South Africa successfully obtained removal. In qualitative interviews, women with challenges accessing FP services mentioned long queues, deprioritization of contraceptive services, lack of transportation, stock-outs, and fear of contracting COVID-19 at a facility. Key informants reported stock-outs, especially of injectables, and staff shortages as barriers. Conclusions: We did not find a substantial impact of COVID-19 on contraceptive access among this sample; however, providers and others involved in service provision identified risks to continuity of care. As the COVID-19 pandemic wanes, it continues to be important to monitor people\'s ability to access their preferred contraceptive methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:宫内节育器插入期间或之后子宫无症状穿孔后,由于缺乏立即随访,宫内节育器(IUD)的丢失是一个罕见的发现。我们报告了一种罕见的情况,其中宫内节育器向右输卵管迁移后子宫穿孔而没有内脏损伤。患者在插入宫内节育器后一年内出现下腹痛和性交疼痛。在检查中,我们注意到右侧耻骨上区域和窥器检查有压痛,没有看到宫内节育器螺纹。放射盆腔检查显示子宫空,没有宫内节育器。进行剖腹手术并取出迁移的宫内节育器,然后修复子宫穿孔。
    结论:宫内节育器伴无症状子宫穿孔而无内脏损伤是一种困扰患者和临床医生的临床疾病。据报道,该病例可提高IUD插入后立即进行阴道检查和盆腔超声检查的意识。
    BACKGROUND: Loss of Intra Uterine Device (IUD) following silent perforation of the uterus either during or after IUD insertion is an uncommon finding due to a lack of immediate follow-up. We report a rare case in which uterine perforation following the migration of IUD to the right fallopian tube without visceral injury. The patient presented with lower abdominal pain and pain during sex for one year since IUD insertion. On examination, we noted tenderness on the right suprapubic region and on speculum examination, no IUD thread was seen. A radiological pelvic examination showed an empty uterus without an IUD. Laparotomy and retrieval of migrated IUD was done followed by repair of perforated uterus.
    CONCLUSIONS: Migrated IUD with silent uterine perforation without visceral injury is a distressing clinical condition both to the patient and the clinician. This case is reported to increase awareness in doing immediate vaginal examination and pelvic ultrasound post-IUD insertion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号