BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device is one of the effective, safe, convenient, economical, and reversible contraceptive methods. Although its contraceptive effect is definite, some female patients may experience complications such as expulsion, bleeding, and pregnancy with the device in place. Rectal perforation is one of the rare and serious complications, which can lead to complications such as abdominal infection and intestinal adhesions, severely affecting the quality of life of patients.
METHODS: A 34-year-old female was sent to the Department of Gastroenterology with noticeable left lower quadrant abdominal pain. She had presented with abdominal discomfort and anal tenesmus 1 year earlier. Two months ago, her abdominal pain had gradually worsened and she was presented to our hospital.
METHODS: Investigations, including colonoscopy and computed tomography scan, had revealed an intrauterine device migrated and perforated into the rectum.
RESULTS: The patient underwent successful colonoscopic removal of the intrauterine device. She recovered well after the treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: This case proves that endoscopic therapy can be considered the preferred method for removing intrauterine devices displaced into the digestive tract lumen.

BACKGROUND: The overall pregnancy rate in individuals with an intrauterine device (IUD) for contraception is <1%. If pregnancy occurs while an IUD is in place, there is a higher risk of an ectopic pregnancy. We report the case of a woman with an IUD who was 7 weeks pregnant and experienced a spontaneous abortion 1 week later.
METHODS: A 32-year-old woman presented to our outpatient department with intermittent vaginal staining for several days.
METHODS: She was 7 weeks pregnant and had an IUD in place for over 4 years. A vaginal examination revealed no vaginal bleeding and no blood clots; however, a parous cervix was observed. The IUD string was not visible. Transvaginal ultrasonography revealed a gestational sac in the uterine cavity, with a fetal pole and a crown-rump length of 11.4 mm. The fetal heart rate was 159 beats/min. The IUD was located in the retroplacental region. The bilateral adnexa appeared normal (right ovary, 2.9 cm; left ovary, 2.5 cm). The patient was diagnosed with an intrauterine pregnancy with an IUD in place and threatened abortion.
METHODS: Attempts to remove the IUD were abandoned due to its location, and conservative treatment was initiated with Utrogestan (100 mg) administered 3 times a day for 1 week. Bed rest was advised.
RESULTS: Unfortunately, she experienced a complete abortion 1 week later.
CONCLUSIONS: The novelty of this case report lies in the rare occurrence of an intrauterine pregnancy with a long-term IUD in place, the challenges posed by the IUD\'s specific location, and the complex management of threatened abortion in this context. Our case highlights the diagnostic management approach for intrauterine pregnancy with an IUD in place. Furthermore, it explores the impact of IUD location on pregnancy prognosis.

UNASSIGNED: Bladder stones, although rare in a healthy bladder, can emerge due to various factors, including obstructions in urinary flow, recurrent infections, and foreign bodies. Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) are known for their potential to migrate from the uterine cavity, leading to unusual complications such as bladder stone formation.
METHODS: A 52-year-old woman, previously treated for a complicated urinary tract infection, presented with intermittent lower abdominal pain, dysuria, and hematuria. She had a history of an IUCD insertion 15 years earlier, which was later documented as missing. Diagnostic imaging revealed a large bladder stone, encasing the previously inserted IUCD. An open vesicolithotomy was performed, during which a stone measuring 6 × 5 cm was removed, revealing the IUCD within. The patient had an uncomplicated recovery with no further urinary tract infections at a 6-month follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: The migration of an IUCD can lead to various complications, depending on its final location. The formation of bladder stones around a migrated IUCD is a rare but significant complication, necessitating a thorough diagnostic approach. Radiography and ultrasonography proved sufficient for diagnosing the intravesical migration in this case.
CONCLUSIONS: This case underscores the importance of considering a migrated IUCD in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with urinary symptoms, especially those with a history of a missing IUCD. Timely diagnosis and management are crucial in preventing further complications.

According to reports, there are 1.9-3.6 incidences of IUD migration and uterine perforation for every 1000 IUD insertions. It is important to note that bladder perforation caused by a misplaced IUD is uncommon and is thought to happen most frequently during insertion. Here, we describe a patient who presented with symptoms related to the malposition of IUD inside the bladder. It is feasible to draw the conclusion that the cystoscopy technique should be taken into consideration as a suitable therapy option for such injuries in this organ. When a problem cannot be effectively treated by cystoscopy alone, laparotomy should be considered.

BACKGROUND: Uterine perforation is a serious complication of intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) placement. However, as complete uterine perforation and extrauterine migration may remain asymptomatic, thorough localization of the IUD is important prior to reinsertion.
METHODS: A 33-year-old patient who has had 4 IUD insertions, wherein the location of the first IUD (inserted 14 years ago) was not identified prior to reinsertion and replacement of the subsequent three. She presented to hospital with a 6-month history of abdominal pain. Pelvic ultrasonography (US), radiography, hysteroscopy and laparoscopy examinations confirmed that a retained migrated IUD in the right broad ligament.
METHODS: Uterine perforation, IUD migration to the broad ligament.
METHODS: The patient underwent hysteroscopy and laparoscopy.
RESULTS: Both IUDs were successfully removed without any complications.

暂无摘要。

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are commonly used, effective forms of long-acting removable contraceptives that may be inserted by primary care providers. Adverse outcomes with copper IUDs specifically have been extensively documented; however, there is little guidance on whether to offer an IUD to a patient who has already experienced adverse outcomes related to IUDs. In this case report, our patient experienced three complications with three different copper IUDs, including a spontaneous expulsion, a fragmented device, and a retained device in addition to two unintended pregnancies. In our view, a different form of contraception should be offered for a patient that has already experienced multiple adverse outcomes related to IUDs.

BACKGROUND: Intrauterine devices are a widely used method of contraception worldwide. These devices are reliable, cost-effective, long-acting, and reversible. Their placement in the uterus is usually simple and safe. Forgotten IUDs carry some complications and can adversely affect the health of women. Therefore, appropriate counseling during insertion and timely removal are crucial. We present the case of retained Lippes loop IUD for 40 years in a 75-year-old postmenopausal patient from Western Ethiopia. The patient presented to the hospital with postmenopausal pelvic pain. The loop was removed with spongy forceps. The patient was discharged with analgesia and doxycycline twice a day for 3 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Different works of the literature showed that retained Lippes loop IUD carries some complications. Our case was also presented with postmenopausal pelvic pain. Therefore, we recommend the removal of IUDs at their expiry date or menopause.

Intrauterine device(IUD)migrating to the bladder is rare,especially the migration far away from the uterus into the bladder wall.Due to no obvious clinical symptom in the early stage and being far away from the uterus,the IUD totally embedded in the bladder wall is prone to misdiagnosis and delay in treatment.We reported one case of such migration,aiming to improve the clinical management of the IUD totally embedded in the bladder wall.
宫内节育器膀胱异位较为少见,尤其是远离子宫并完全膀胱壁内异位更为罕见。宫内节育器完全膀胱壁内异位早期无明显临床症状,且远离子宫,容易漏诊而延误治疗。本文报道1例宫内节育器完全膀胱壁内异位的诊疗过程,以提高该类疾病的诊疗认识。.

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) have become one of the most frequently used forms of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) in women of childbearing age. While complications are generally considered to be minimal, they can occur during the insertion, during use, or upon removal. Uterine anomalies, such as a bicornuate uterus, can increase the risk of complications during all stages. Here, we describe a case of a patient with a bicornuate uterus who had a levonorgestrel IUD in place for five years before she experienced a dislodging of the IUD, fragmentation upon attempted removal, and ultimately required a hysteroscopy to remove an embedded fragment from the endocervical canal. Due to the limited reporting on fragmented IUDs, further studies will be required to assess the optimal management. While symptomatic patients should have the fragment removed, asymptomatic patients should have their individual history and desire for future pregnancy weighed against the risk and benefits of treatment.