Intrauterine Devices

宫内节育器
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    尽管子宫穿孔是一种罕见但严重的并发症,宫内节育器是全球流行和有效的避孕方法。
    我院收治一名76岁女性患者,表现为阴道渗漏和下腹部不适。诊断成像发现膀胱阴道瘘和膀胱结石,可归因于四十年前插入的宫内节育器穿孔。患者接受了开放手术进行膀胱结石切除和膀胱阴道瘘修复。
    如果使用宫内节育器的患者抱怨膀胱结石或持续的下尿路症状,器械引起的膀胱穿孔在鉴别诊断中应考虑。
    UNASSIGNED: Although uterine perforation is a rare but serious complication, intrauterine devices are globally popular and effective contraceptive methods.
    UNASSIGNED: A 76-year-old female patient manifesting symptoms of vaginal leakage and lower abdominal discomfort was admitted to our hospital. Diagnostic imaging identified a vesicovaginal fistula and bladder calculi attributable to perforation of the bladder by an intrauterine device that had been inserted over four decades ago. The patient underwent open surgery for cystolith removal and vesicovaginal fistula repair.
    UNASSIGNED: If a patient with an intrauterine device complains of bladder stones or ongoing lower urinary tract symptoms, bladder perforation caused by the device should be considered in the differential diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在大多数西方国家,医疗保健费用的上涨是一个主要问题。替代医疗保健是一种战略方法,旨在降低成本,同时在患者住所附近提供医疗服务。一个说明性实例涉及将门诊医院护理迁移到初级护理设置。值得注意的是,在初级保健环境中可以安全地插入宫内节育器(IUD).为了建立宫内节育器替代率的务实目标,我们对与插入宫内节育器有关的医疗替代的地区差异进行了评估.此外,我们调查了一级和二级医疗保健环境在随访超声和宫内节育器再插入方面的差异.
    方法:所有在2016年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间在荷兰初级保健(由全科医生和助产士)和二级保健(由医院医生)接受宫内节育器插入的妇女纳入研究。主要结果指标是按护理环境在区域一级按病例混合调整的IUD插入率,以及需要在三个月内进行随访超声和IUD重新插入的比例。
    结果:在840,766个IUD放置中,74%的人被安置在初级保健中,26%被安置在二级保健中。初级保健的比例从2016年的70%增加到2020年的77%。在区域之间观察到的替代率范围为58%至82%。与初级保健专业人员相比,那些接受二级保健的人进行了更多的超声检查以验证宫内节育器的放置(23%与3%;p值<0.01)和三个月内更多的宫内节育器重插(6%vs.2%;p值<0.01)。
    结论:宫内节育器越来越多地插入荷兰的初级保健中,区域IUD插入护理替代率峰值≥80%。IUD插入护理替代初级保健似乎与在三个月内进行超声随访或IUD重新插入的妇女人数显着减少有关。
    BACKGROUND: Rising health care costs are a major concern in most Western countries. The substitution of healthcare stands as a strategic approach aimed at mitigating costs while offering medical services in proximity to patients\' residences. An illustrative instance involves the migration of outpatient hospital care to primary care settings. Notably, the insertion of intrauterine devices (IUDs) can be safely executed within primary care contexts. In order to establish a pragmatic objective for the rate of IUD substitution, we conducted an evaluation of regional disparities in healthcare substitution pertaining to the insertion of intrauterine devices. Furthermore, we investigated disparities in the follow-up ultrasound and reinsertion of IUDs between primary and secondary healthcare environments.
    METHODS: All women who underwent IUD insertion in Dutch primary care (by general practitioners and midwives) and secondary care (by hospital physicians) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020 were included. The main outcome measures were the case-mix adjusted IUD insertion rates at the regional level by care setting and the proportions requiring follow-up ultrasound and IUD reinsertion within three months.
    RESULTS: Of the 840,766 IUD placements, 74% were inserted in primary care and 26% in secondary care. The proportion inserted in primary care increased from 70% in 2016 to 77% in 2020. The observed substitution rate ranged from 58 to 82% between regions. Compared with health care professionals in primary care, those in secondary care performed more ultrasounds to verify IUD placement (23% vs. 3%; p-value < 0.01) and more IUD reinsertions within three months (6% vs. 2%; p-value < 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: IUDs are increasingly being inserted in Dutch primary care, with peak regional IUD insertion care substitution rates at ≥ 80%. IUD insertion care substitution to primary care appears to be associated with significantly fewer women having follow-up ultrasound or IUD reinsertion within three months.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:妇女在出生后的12个月内特别容易意外怀孕。在产妇环境中改善获得产后避孕的机会可以防止意外和紧密间隔的分娩,改善母亲和孩子的健康。本文将总结产后避孕(PPC)的最新研究,建立在这一领域现有的知识和发展的基础上。
    结果:目前的产后避孕药具供应模式可能无法充分满足妇女的需求。COVID-19大流行导致产后避孕药具供应发生变化,越来越重视产妇服务。产前避孕讨论与产后避孕计划的增加和出生后方法的吸收有关。数字健康干预可能是支持避孕信息的有用工具。最有效的长效可逆避孕(LARC)方法,例如宫内节育器(IUD)和植入物,由于训练有素的提供者的可用性,在产妇环境中提供可能是具有挑战性的。产后宫内节育器插入相对未得到充分利用,尽管有证据支持它的安全性,功效和成本效益。
    结论:产前信息需要与出生后立即获得全方位的方法合作,以减少PPC摄取的障碍。产妇提供者的培训和教育对于成功实施PPC服务至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: Women are particularly vulnerable to unintended pregnancy in the 12 months following a birth. Improving access to postpartum contraception within maternity settings can prevent unintended and closely spaced births, improving the health of mother and child. This review will summarize the recent research in postpartum contraception (PPC), building on existing knowledge and developments in this field.
    RESULTS: Current models of postpartum contraceptive provision may not adequately meet women\'s needs. The COVID-19 pandemic led to changes in postpartum contraceptive provision, with an increasing emphasis placed on maternity services. Antenatal contraceptive discussion is associated with increased postpartum contraceptive planning and uptake of methods after birth. Digital health interventions may be a useful tool to support information about contraception. The most effective long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods, such as the intrauterine device (IUD) and implant, can be challenging to provide in the maternity setting because of availability of trained providers. Postpartum IUD insertion remains relatively under-utilized, despite evidence supporting its safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
    CONCLUSIONS: Antenatal information needs to be partnered with access to the full range of methods immediately after birth to reduce barriers to PPC uptake. Training and education of maternity providers is central to successful implementation of PPC services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19大流行影响了全球获得卫生服务的机会,包括避孕。我们试图探索大流行对南非和赞比亚计划生育(FP)服务提供和使用的影响,包括植入和宫内节育器(IUD)用户的愿望和能力获得移除。方法:在2020年8月至2021年4月之间,我们对537名参与正在进行的纵向避孕延续研究的妇女进行了调查。我们还对参与FP提供的39名调查参与者和36名关键线人进行了深入访谈。我们对调查答复进行了描述性分析,对访谈进行了主题分析。结果:随着COVID-19的出现,该样本中避孕药具的使用变化最小。自流行病开始以来,不到一半的妇女(n=220)报告试图使用FP,其中绝大多数使用短效方法。在那些寻求服务的人中,95%获得了他们首选的方法。在赞比亚,在大流行开始之前和之后不使用一种方法的妇女比例没有变化(31%);在南非,比例从8%上升到10%。在这两个国家中,不到7%的植入物或宫内节育器使用者报告想要移除。在寻求驱逐的人中(n=22),91%(n=10)在赞比亚和55%(n=6)在南非胜利获得去除。在定性采访中,有挑战获得FP服务的女性提到排长队,取消避孕服务的优先次序,缺乏交通,缺货,以及担心在设施感染COVID-19。关键线人报告了缺货,尤其是注射剂,和员工短缺作为障碍。结论:在该样本中,我们没有发现COVID-19对避孕方法的实质性影响;然而,提供者和其他参与提供服务的人发现了护理连续性的风险。随着COVID-19大流行的减弱,它仍然是重要的监测人们的能力,以获得他们的首选避孕方法。
    Background: The COVID-19 pandemic affected global access to health services, including contraception. We sought to explore effects of the pandemic on family planning (FP) service provision and use in South Africa and Zambia, including on implant and intrauterine device (IUD) users\' desire and ability to obtain removal. Methods: Between August 2020 and April 2021, we conducted surveys with 537 women participating in an ongoing longitudinal contraceptive continuation study. We also carried out in-depth interviews with 39 of the survey participants and 36 key informants involved in FP provision. We conducted descriptive analysis of survey responses and thematic analysis of interviews. Results: Contraceptive use changed minimally in this sample with the emergence of COVID-19. Fewer than half of women (n=220) reported attempting to access FP since the start of the pandemic, the vast majority of whom were using short-acting methods. Among those who sought services, 95% obtained their preferred method. The proportion of women not using a method before and after pandemic start did not change in Zambia (31%); in South Africa, the proportion increased from 8% to 10%. Less than 7% of implant or IUD users in either country reported wanting removal. Among those who sought removal (n=22), 91% (n=10) in Zambia and 55% (n=6) in South Africa successfully obtained removal. In qualitative interviews, women with challenges accessing FP services mentioned long queues, deprioritization of contraceptive services, lack of transportation, stock-outs, and fear of contracting COVID-19 at a facility. Key informants reported stock-outs, especially of injectables, and staff shortages as barriers. Conclusions: We did not find a substantial impact of COVID-19 on contraceptive access among this sample; however, providers and others involved in service provision identified risks to continuity of care. As the COVID-19 pandemic wanes, it continues to be important to monitor people\'s ability to access their preferred contraceptive methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:宫内节育器插入期间或之后子宫无症状穿孔后,由于缺乏立即随访,宫内节育器(IUD)的丢失是一个罕见的发现。我们报告了一种罕见的情况,其中宫内节育器向右输卵管迁移后子宫穿孔而没有内脏损伤。患者在插入宫内节育器后一年内出现下腹痛和性交疼痛。在检查中,我们注意到右侧耻骨上区域和窥器检查有压痛,没有看到宫内节育器螺纹。放射盆腔检查显示子宫空,没有宫内节育器。进行剖腹手术并取出迁移的宫内节育器,然后修复子宫穿孔。
    结论:宫内节育器伴无症状子宫穿孔而无内脏损伤是一种困扰患者和临床医生的临床疾病。据报道,该病例可提高IUD插入后立即进行阴道检查和盆腔超声检查的意识。
    BACKGROUND: Loss of Intra Uterine Device (IUD) following silent perforation of the uterus either during or after IUD insertion is an uncommon finding due to a lack of immediate follow-up. We report a rare case in which uterine perforation following the migration of IUD to the right fallopian tube without visceral injury. The patient presented with lower abdominal pain and pain during sex for one year since IUD insertion. On examination, we noted tenderness on the right suprapubic region and on speculum examination, no IUD thread was seen. A radiological pelvic examination showed an empty uterus without an IUD. Laparotomy and retrieval of migrated IUD was done followed by repair of perforated uterus.
    CONCLUSIONS: Migrated IUD with silent uterine perforation without visceral injury is a distressing clinical condition both to the patient and the clinician. This case is reported to increase awareness in doing immediate vaginal examination and pelvic ultrasound post-IUD insertion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:学习在家庭医学住院期间提供长效可逆避孕(LARC)是建立初级保健人员能力以满足社区生殖保健需求的重要一步。我们旨在衡量增加避孕访问类型(CVT)的影响,以允许快速获得避孕(RAC)对家庭医学居民LARC程序编号的影响。
    方法:我们的项目创建了一个CVT,其中患者仅用于避孕服务。我们将CVT添加到第三年家庭医学住院医师连续性诊所时间表中,并将CVT(RAC诊所)添加到第三年妇科轮换中。居民自我报告的LARC程序编号在整个居住期间执行,并比较了2023年(RAC后队列)至2022年毕业生和2018-2022年毕业生(RAC前队列)的毕业生总数。
    结果:RAC后队列居民报告,与2022年RAC前队列相比,宫内节育器(IUD;P=0.015)和避孕植入物(P=.010)的移除量有统计学意义的增加。与RAC前队列相比,宫内节育器和避孕植入物的插入没有变化。宫内节育器去除(P=.004)和插入(P=.034),与2022年毕业生相比,RAC后的避孕植入物移除量(P=0.028)显着增加,避孕植入物的插入没有差异(P=0.211)。
    结论:在两个比较中,CVT和RAC诊所的增加导致了LARC去除量的增加,和2022年至2023年之间的宫内节育器插入。这种诊所模式为其他家庭医学住院医师计划提供了机会,以改善获得避孕服务的机会,并增加LARC管理方面的住院医师培训。
    OBJECTIVE: Learning to provide long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) during family medicine residency is an important step in building capacity for the primary care workforce to meet the reproductive health care needs of communities. We aimed to measure the impact of adding a contraceptive visit type (CVT) allowing for rapid access to contraception (RAC) on family medicine resident LARC procedure numbers.
    METHODS: Our program created a CVT in which patients were seen only for contraceptive services. We added the CVT to third-year family medicine resident continuity clinic schedules and a block of CVTs (the RAC clinic) to the third-year gynecology rotation. Residents self-reported LARC procedure numbers performed throughout residency, and the totals were compared for graduating residents from 2023 (post-RAC cohort) to 2022 graduates and 2018-2022 graduates (pre-RAC cohort).
    RESULTS: Post-RAC cohort residents reported a statistically significant increase in intrauterine device (IUD; P=.015) and contraceptive implant (P=.010) removals compared to the 2022 pre-RAC cohort. Insertions of IUDs and contraceptive implants were unchanged when compared to the pre-RAC cohort. IUD removals (P=.004) and insertions (P=.034), and contraceptive implant removals (P=.028) were significantly increased for post-RAC compared to 2022 graduates, with no difference in contraceptive implant insertions (P=.211).
    CONCLUSIONS: The addition of the CVT and RAC clinic contributed to an increase in LARC removals in both comparisons, and IUD insertions between 2022 and 2023. This clinic model offers an opportunity for other family medicine residency programs to improve access to contraceptive services and increase resident training in LARC management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:宫内节育器是有效的,安全,方便,经济,和可逆的避孕方法。虽然它的避孕效果是肯定的,一些女性患者可能会出现并发症,如驱逐,出血,在设备到位的情况下怀孕。直肠穿孔是一种罕见且严重的并发症,这可能导致并发症,如腹部感染和肠粘连,严重影响患者的生活质量。
    方法:一名34岁女性因明显的左下腹疼痛被送往消化内科。1年前,她出现了腹部不适和肛门里急后重。两个月前,她的腹痛逐渐加重,并被送往我们医院。
    方法:调查,包括结肠镜检查和计算机断层扫描,发现宫内节育器迁移并穿孔进入直肠。
    结果:患者在结肠镜下成功取出宫内节育器。治疗后她恢复得很好。
    结论:该病例证明内镜治疗可被认为是移除移位到消化道腔内的宫内节育器的首选方法。
    BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device is one of the effective, safe, convenient, economical, and reversible contraceptive methods. Although its contraceptive effect is definite, some female patients may experience complications such as expulsion, bleeding, and pregnancy with the device in place. Rectal perforation is one of the rare and serious complications, which can lead to complications such as abdominal infection and intestinal adhesions, severely affecting the quality of life of patients.
    METHODS: A 34-year-old female was sent to the Department of Gastroenterology with noticeable left lower quadrant abdominal pain. She had presented with abdominal discomfort and anal tenesmus 1 year earlier. Two months ago, her abdominal pain had gradually worsened and she was presented to our hospital.
    METHODS: Investigations, including colonoscopy and computed tomography scan, had revealed an intrauterine device migrated and perforated into the rectum.
    RESULTS: The patient underwent successful colonoscopic removal of the intrauterine device. She recovered well after the treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case proves that endoscopic therapy can be considered the preferred method for removing intrauterine devices displaced into the digestive tract lumen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:尽管在美国青少年中使用长效可逆避孕(LARC),关于影响宫内节育器(IUD)或皮下植入物使用的因素的文献有限.这项研究旨在描述全州的利率,青少年宫内节育器或植入和继续植入的相关患者和提供者因素。
    方法:本回顾性队列研究使用N.C.Medicaid索赔数据。10,408名青少年符合资格(即,13-19年,女性性别,持续的医疗补助登记,从2013年1月1日至2015年10月1日,有宫内节育器或植入物插入或取出代码)。双变量分析评估青少年使用宫内节育器与植入物的差异。创建Kaplan-Meier曲线以评估到2018年12月31日IUD或植入物停药。
    结果:青少年开始植入8,592枚植入物和3,369枚宫内节育器(N=11,961)。对于那些开始植入宫内节育器的人,几乎所有提供者和患者因素都存在显着差异。第一年移除16%的植入物和53%的宫内节育器。更年轻(即,年龄<18岁),西班牙裔,与年长和白人青少年相比,黑人青少年的植入物调整后的连续性更高,分别(两者p<.001)。与非产科医生/妇科医生提供者相比,那些由产科医生/妇科医生提供者插入宫内节育器的持续宫内节育器较低(p<.001)。
    结论:我们发现年龄相关,种族,植入和宫内节育器延续存在种族差异。需要进行实践更改,以支持青少年在植入和IUD插入和移除方面的积极经验,包括以患者为中心的医疗服务提供者避孕咨询培训,面向青少年提供者的LARC启动和移除培训,以及更广泛的LARC服务诊所能力。
    OBJECTIVE: Despite increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) among U.S. adolescents, there is limited literature on factors affecting intrauterine device (IUD) or subdermal implant use. This study aimed to describe statewide rates, and associated patient and provider factors of adolescent IUD or implant initiation and continuation.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used N.C. Medicaid claims data. 10,408 adolescents were eligible (i.e., 13-19 years, female sex, continuous Medicaid enrollment, had an IUD or implant insertion or removal code from January 1, 2013, to October 1, 2015). Bivariate analyses assessed differences in adolescents using IUD versus implant. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to assess IUD or implant discontinuation through December 31, 2018.
    RESULTS: Adolescents initiated 8,592 implants and 3,369 IUDs (N = 11,961). There were significant differences in nearly all provider and patient factors for those who initiated implants versus IUDs. 16% of implants and 53% of IUDs were removed in the first year. Younger (i.e., age <18 years old), Hispanic, and Black adolescents had higher adjusted continuation of implants compared with older and White adolescents, respectively (both p < .001). Those whose IUD was inserted by an obstetrician/gynecologist provider had lower continuation of IUDs compared with non-obstetrician/gynecologist providers (p < .001).
    CONCLUSIONS: We found that age-related, racial, and ethnic disparities exist in both implant and IUD continuation. Practice changes to support positive adolescent experiences with implant and IUD insertion and removals are needed, including patient-centered health care provider training in contraception counseling, LARC initiation and removal training for adolescent-facing providers, and broader clinic capacity for LARC services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估产后6周时宫内节育器(PPIUD)的延续率,在资源不足的情况下,在现有计划中的6个月和1年,并确定终止的决定因素,驱逐和驱逐。
    方法:我们使用了前瞻性队列设计,并在奥里萨邦和恰蒂斯加尔邦的100个公共医疗机构中招募了最近的PPIUD采用者妇女,印度。我们收集了他们的社会人口统计信息,并在六周内对他们进行了电话跟踪,6个月和1年为并发症和延续状态。我们评估了PPIUD的延续率和与PPIUD停药相关的因素,移除,并使用Cox比例风险模型进行驱逐。
    结果:我们招募了916名参与者(来自奥里萨邦的579名(63.2%)和来自恰蒂斯加尔邦的337名(36.8%))。PPIUD在第6周的延续率为88.7%,6个月为74.8%,一年为60.1%。一旦停产,不选择任何计划生育方法的机会很高(高达81.2%)。接受6至12级教育的参与者和那些经历并发症的人(疼痛的腹部,每次阴道出血和排出)更有可能取出宫内节育器,调整后的风险比分别为1.82(95%CI:1.18-2.79)和4.39(95%CI:3.25-5.93)。对于驱逐,我们没有发现任何有统计学意义的因素.
    结论:PPIUD延续率在最初6周后显著下降。必须加强管理并发症的辅导及跟进服务,特别是在PPIUD插入的前6周,以增强和维持方案影响。
    结论:我们的研究结果强调需要加强客户咨询和随访以管理并发症,尤其是在插入PPIUDs的前6周。正在进行的计划需要解决这方面的全面能力建设工作。
    OBJECTIVE: To estimate continuation rates for postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUD) at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1-year within existing programs in an under-resourced setting, and to identify determinants of discontinuation, removal and expulsion.
    METHODS: We used a prospective cohort design and enrolled recent PPIUD adopter women across 100 public healthcare facilities in Odisha and Chhattisgarh, India. We collected their socio-demographic information and followed them up telephonically at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year for complications and continuation status. We assessed PPIUD continuation rates and factors associated with PPIUD discontinuation, removal, and expulsion using Cox proportional hazards modelling.
    RESULTS: We enrolled 916 participants (579 (63.2%) from Odisha and 337 (36.8%) from Chhattisgarh). The continuation rate of PPIUD was 88.7% at 6 weeks, 74.8% at 6 months 60.1% at one year. Once discontinued, chances of not opting for any family planning method was high (up to 81.2%). Participants with education of 6th to 12th class and those experiencing complications (pain abdomen, bleeding and discharge per vaginum) were more likely to remove the IUD with adjusted hazard ratio of 1.82 (95% CI: 1.18-2.79) and 4.39 (95% CI: 3.25-5.93) respectively. For expulsion, we did not find any factor that was statistically significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: PPIUD continuation rates declined considerably after the initial 6 weeks. Counselling and follow-up services for managing complications must be strengthened, especially in the first 6 weeks of PPIUD insertion, to enhance and sustain programmatic impact.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasize on the need to strengthen client counseling and follow-up for management of complications, especially in the first 6 weeks of insertion of PPIUDs. Ongoing programs need to address comprehensive capacity building efforts in this regard.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号