Interdisciplinary collaboration

跨学科合作
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿童虐待是一个全球性问题,使儿童面临精神疾病的风险,药物滥用,过早死亡。跨学科合作对于预防和检测虐待儿童很重要。在挪威,儿童接受普遍的预防性健康评估,并在儿童和家庭健康诊所接受专业公共卫生护士的免费随访护理。这些护士进行定期检查和家访,以监测儿童是否有虐待的迹象。
    目的:本研究的目的是描述儿童和家庭保健诊所的公共卫生护士如何遵循国家临床指南来预防和发现儿童虐待,特别关注临床程序和跨学科合作。此外,我们的目标是确定与儿童虐待识别相关的因素。
    方法:对10月24日至12月31日在初级保健工作的公共卫生护士进行了一项横断面在线调查,2022年。与0-5岁儿童一起工作并与家人协商的公共卫生护士有资格参加,产生554个响应。这项研究采用了描述性分析,包括频率,百分比和平均值,以及两步逻辑回归分析。这项研究得到了有关当局的批准,并通过问卷填写获得知情同意。
    结果:本研究中的公共卫生护士表现出对指南的强烈坚持,并利用各种综合评估程序来监测儿童的健康状况,增长,和发展。然而,与其他专业人士的合作有限且不频繁,如儿童保护服务,全科医生,和医院。大多数公共卫生护士报告偶尔怀疑虐待儿童,年龄和在儿童和家庭诊所的经验影响了这些怀疑。年长的公共卫生护士更有可能怀疑身体暴力,而那些有不到两年经验的人报告说,怀疑虐待的经验较少。额外的教育增加了怀疑性暴力的可能性。
    结论:这项研究提供了对挪威公共卫生护士在儿童和家庭诊所中发现和预防儿童虐待行为的见解。虽然坚持准则很强烈,虐待的嫌疑相对罕见。各机构之间的合作对于解决虐待儿童的问题至关重要。年龄和经验可能会影响虐待的检测。改进协作,有针对性的指导方针,需要持续的专业发展来加强儿童保护。
    BACKGROUND: Child maltreatment is a global problem that puts children at risk of mental illness, substance abuse, and premature death. Interdisciplinary collaboration is important in preventing and detecting child maltreatment. In Norway, children undergo universal preventive health assessments and receive complimentary follow-up care from specialized public health nurses in child and family health clinics. These nurses conduct regular check-ups and home visits to monitor children for signs of maltreatment.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to describe how public health nurses at child and family health clinics follow the National Clinical Guidelines to prevent and detect child maltreatment, with a particular focus on clinical procedures and interdisciplinary collaboration. Furthermore, we aim to determine factors that are associated with identification of child maltreatment.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among public health nurses working in primary care between October 24th and December 31st, 2022. Public health nurses who worked with children aged 0-5 years and had consultations with families were eligible to participate, resulting in 554 responses. The study employed descriptive analysis, including frequency, percentage and mean, as well as a two-step logistic regression analysis. The study was approved by the relevant authority, and informed consent was obtained through questionnaire completion.
    RESULTS: The public health nurses in this study displayed strong adherence to the guidelines and utilized various comprehensive assessment procedures to monitor child well-being, growth, and development. However, there was limited and infrequent collaboration with other professionals, such as child protection services, general practitioners, and hospitals. Most public health nurses reported occasional suspicion of child maltreatment, with age and years of experience in child and family clinics influencing these suspicions. Older public health nurses were more likely to suspect physical violence, while those with less than two years of experience reported less experience in suspecting maltreatment. Additional education increased the probability of suspecting sexual violence.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into the practices of public health nurses in Norway regarding the detection and prevention of child maltreatment in child and family clinics. While adherence to guidelines is strong, suspicion of maltreatment is relatively rare. Collaboration across agencies is crucial in addressing child maltreatment. Age and experience may influence the detection of maltreatment. Improved collaboration, targeted guidelines, and ongoing professional development are needed to enhance child protection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的使用越来越多,并且可能涉及临床相关的药物-药物相互作用(DDI),从而增加大出血或血栓栓塞的风险。熟练的药物相互作用管理对于确保DOAC的安全有效使用至关重要。在这项研究中,我们旨在调查在现实生活中的社区药房环境中使用DOAC检测和管理DDI对DOAC使用者的药物治疗的影响.
    方法:我们在比利时的201家社区药房进行了一项干预研究。在随机的日子里,筛查了购买DOAC或已知与之相互作用的药物的患者。当检测到带有DOAC的DDI时,药剂师联系了处方医生,讨论了相互作用的管理。先前开发的以实践为导向的DDI清单以及门诊护理管理计划被用于DDI的筛查和管理。
    结果:总计,包括751名患者,其中确定了875个DDI,主要是药效学DDIs(95.7%)。主要的相互作用药物类别包括选择性5-羟色胺或5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(32.9%),抗血小板(30.9%),和非甾体抗炎药(28.9%)。在43.0%的DDI中,决定进行干预。在三个月的随访中,79.1%的DDI实施了拟议的药物治疗变更.
    结论:本研究表明,在社区药房使用DOAC积极筛查和管理DDI,与处方医生密切合作,导致大量患者的药物治疗发生变化。这可能大大有助于在高风险人群中更安全地利用DOAC。
    BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used and can be involved in clinically relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs) that increase the risk of major bleeding or thromboembolism. Skilled drug interaction management is essential to ensure safe and effective use of DOACs. In this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of the detection and management of DDIs with DOACs in a real-life community pharmacy setting on the pharmacotherapy of DOAC users.
    METHODS: We conducted an intervention study in 201 community pharmacies in Belgium. On random days, patients purchasing DOACs or drugs known to interact with them were screened. When a DDI with the DOAC was detected, the pharmacist contacted the prescribing physician to discuss the management of the interaction. A previously developed practice-oriented DDI list accompanied by management plans for ambulatory care was used for both screening and management of the DDIs.
    RESULTS: In total, 751 patients were included, among whom 875 DDIs were identified, primarily pharmacodynamic DDIs (95.7 %). Predominant interacting drug classes included selective serotonin or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (32.9 %), antiplatelets (30.9 %), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (28.9 %). In 43.0 % of DDIs, an intervention was decided upon. At three-month follow-up, proposed pharmacotherapy changes had been implemented in 79.1 % of these DDIs.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that active screening and management of DDIs with DOACs in community pharmacies, in close collaboration with prescribing physicians, resulted in changes in pharmacotherapy in a substantial number of patients. This may contribute significantly to the safer utilisation of DOACs in high-risk populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    院前急救护理是医疗保健的一个关键但往往缺乏研究的方面。这种情况下的患者脆弱性会显著影响结果。这项研究的目的是调查中国院前急诊患者的脆弱性状况并确定相关影响因素。
    在中国进行的这项横断面研究中,从2023年4月到2023年7月,我们使用院前急诊护理安全指数(SPECI)量表评估了院前急诊患者的脆弱性。我们进行了详细的问卷调查,以收集人口统计学和疾病相关信息。我们采用了SPECI量表,由两个分量表组成,评估患者的脆弱性。统计分析,包括t检验,方差分析,和多元线性回归,用于识别与脆弱性相关的因素。
    该研究共包括973名院前急诊患者,有效率为81.9%。这些患者表现出低至中等水平的脆弱性,SPECI平均得分为14.46,满分40分。脆弱性与年龄(尤其是60岁及以上的年龄)显着相关,疾病严重程度(严重状况增加脆弱性),疾病类型(与较高脆弱性相关的循环系统疾病),意识的改变,和慢性疾病。出乎意料的是,消化系统疾病与易损性呈负相关。
    在院前护理中解决患者的脆弱性至关重要。量身定制的干预措施,EMS提供商培训,跨学科合作可以减轻脆弱性,特别是在老年患者和那些有严重的条件。
    Prehospital emergency care is a critical but often understudied aspect of healthcare. Patient vulnerability in this setting can significantly impact outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the vulnerability status and to determine associated affect factors among prehospital emergency patients in China.
    In this cross-sectional study conducted in China, from April 2023 to July 2023, we assessed the vulnerability of prehospital emergency patients using the Safety in Prehospital Emergency Care Index (SPECI) scale. We conducted a detailed questionnaire-based survey to gather demographic and disease-related information. We employed the SPECI scale, consisting of two subscales, to evaluate patient vulnerability. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression, were used to identify factors associated with vulnerability.
    The study included a total of 973 prehospital emergency patients, with a response rate of 81.9%. These patients exhibited a low-to-moderate level of vulnerability, with an average SPECI score of 14.46 out of 40. Vulnerability was significantly associated with age (particularly those aged 60 and above), disease severity (severe conditions increased vulnerability), disease type (circulatory diseases correlated with higher vulnerability), alterations in consciousness, and chronic diseases. Unexpectedly, digestive system diseases were negatively correlated with vulnerability.
    Addressing patient vulnerability in prehospital care is essential. Tailored interventions, EMS provider training, and interdisciplinary collaboration can mitigate vulnerability, especially in older patients and those with severe conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:慢性疼痛的复杂性需要跨学科合作。虽然这在疼痛中心的框架中是可以认识到的,很少有研究调查医疗专业人员如何在疼痛中心进行跨学科合作,包括跨学科合作的促进者和障碍。因此,本研究的目的是调查三级护理疼痛中心的医疗保健专业人员在治疗慢性疼痛患者方面的跨学科合作经验。
    方法:11名医疗保健专业人员,代表来自挪威四个地区疼痛中心的不同医疗保健学科,参加了半结构化的个人访谈。对数据进行了主题分析。
    结果分为三个主题:“慢性疼痛治疗的最佳方法”,\'学院合作\',和“跨学科团队合作的挑战”。线人重视疼痛中心的跨学科工作。他们认为这是为患者提供的最佳方法,并感谢大学合作给他们作为专业人士的支持。虽然一起工作是有益的,并提供了新的见解,线人还经历了跨学科团队合作的挑战,例如,当不同的职业对进一步治疗的建议意见不一致或无法团队合作时。
    结论:调查人员发现疼痛中心的跨学科合作为患者提供了最佳的治疗方法。应该承认,跨学科的团队合作可能具有挑战性,和努力应该投入到建立一个良好的气候合作和获得知识的每个专业的独特性质,以及他们如何有助于疼痛中心的治疗。
    OBJECTIVE: The complexity of chronic pain requires interdisciplinary collaboration. Although this is recognisable in the framework for pain centres, few studies have investigated how interdisciplinary collaboration in pain centres is experienced by healthcare professionals, including the facilitators and barriers to interdisciplinary collaboration. The aim of the current study was therefore to investigate experiences of interdisciplinary collaboration in the treatment of patients with chronic pain among healthcare professionals in tertiary care pain centres.
    METHODS: Eleven healthcare professionals, representing different healthcare disciplines from the four regional pain centres in Norway, participated in semi-structured individual interviews. The data were analysed thematically.
    UNASSIGNED: The results were categorised into three themes \'The best approach for chronic pain treatment\', \'Collegial collaboration\', and \'Challenges with interdisciplinary teamwork\'. The informants valued the interdisciplinary work at the pain centre. They perceived it as the best approach for their patients and appreciated the support the collegial collaboration gave them as professionals. Although working together was rewarding and provided new insights, the informants also experienced the interdisciplinary teamwork as challenging, e.g., when the different professions disagreed on recommendations for further treatment or did not manage to work together as a team.
    CONCLUSIONS: The informants found the interdisciplinary collaboration at the pain centre to provide the best treatment approach for their patients. It should be acknowledged that interdisciplinary teamwork can be challenging, and efforts should be put into establishing a good climate for collaboration and gaining knowledge about each profession\'s unique character and how they contribute to pain centre treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    本研究通过对一名54岁男性患者的详细案例研究,探讨了球孢子菌病(谷热)与结节病之间的复杂相互作用。患者出现钙水平升高,慢性肾脏病(CKD),和意外的减肥。肾病学家和肺科医师之间的跨学科合作在应对复杂的医学挑战方面发挥了至关重要的作用。包括高钙血症,肾功能不全,和肺部异常.诊断过程涉及广泛的实验室发现,揭示了感染原和肉芽肿性疾病的参与。患者表现出阳性球菌IgG抗体,提示球虫菌病.进一步的并发症包括肾小球肾炎,正如正在进行的全身性炎症所揭示的。实施了量身定制的管理策略,包括结节病相关炎症的皮质类固醇治疗和球孢子菌病的抗真菌干预。警惕监测肾功能,高钙血症,减重对于全面的患者护理至关重要.这项研究强调了跨学科合作的重要性,系统诊断,和个性化的病人护理在管理复杂的医疗演示,并有助于理解这两个条件之间的相互作用。
    This study explores the complex interplay between coccidioidomycosis (valley fever) and sarcoidosis through a detailed case study of a 54-year-old male patient. The patient presented with elevated calcium levels, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and unintended weight loss. Interdisciplinary collaboration between nephrologists and pulmonologists played a crucial role in navigating the intricate medical challenges, including hypercalcemia, renal dysfunction, and pulmonary anomalies. The diagnostic journey involved extensive laboratory findings uncovering the involvement of both infectious agents and granulomatous disorders. The patient exhibited positive cocci IgG antibodies, indicating coccidioidomycosis. Further complications included glomerulonephritis, as revealed by ongoing systemic inflammation. Tailored management strategies were implemented, including corticosteroid therapy for sarcoidosis-related inflammation and antifungal interventions for coccidioidomycosis. Vigilant monitoring of renal function, hypercalcemia, and weight loss was essential for comprehensive patient care. The study underscores the significance of interdisciplinary collaboration, systematic diagnostics, and personalized patient care in managing complex medical presentations and contributes to understanding the interplay between these two conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    银屑病关节炎(PsA)是一种复杂且使人衰弱的慢性炎症性关节疾病,通常与银屑病有关,并在其早期诊断和治疗中提出了重大挑战。因此,这项研究旨在调查初级保健机构中PsA的诊断复杂性,以阐明患病率,障碍,以及延迟诊断的影响。为了实现我们的研究目标,我们使用元人种学方法进行了定性综合,这是一种合成定性数据的可靠方法。我们系统地搜索了PubMed,WebofScience,和Embase数据库使用预定义的搜索词,如“银屑病关节炎,\"\"诊断,“和”初级保健。“纳入标准是英语的叙述性文章,提供了对PsA在初级保健中的诊断挑战的见解。会议介绍,原创文章,重复的文章被排除在外。我们的分析揭示了四个关键主题,阐明了初级保健中PsA诊断的多面性:(1)各种初始和非特异性症状,强调可以模仿其他条件的不同临床表现;(2)初级保健专业人员缺乏PsA的经验,强调教育和培训的重要性;(3)缺乏皮肤损伤,当不存在时,会使诊断复杂化;(4)诊断延迟,对患者的健康和生活质量有潜在的严重后果。这项研究强调了在初级保健环境中PsA诊断固有的挑战。这种疾病的多面性,再加上初级保健提供者的经验有限,通常会导致延迟诊断和随后的治疗开始。早期识别和干预对于优化患者预后至关重要。应对这些挑战需要采取全面的方法,包括增加临床怀疑,继续医学教育,跨学科合作,以及标准化诊断标准的利用。初级保健医生和专家之间的合作对于提高PsA诊断的准确性和及时性以及最终改善患者的健康状况和生活质量至关重要。
    Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a complex and debilitating chronic inflammatory joint disorder that is often associated with psoriasis and presents significant challenges in its early diagnosis and management. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the diagnostic intricacies of PsA in primary care settings to shed light on the prevalence, barriers, and implications of delayed diagnosis. To achieve our research objectives, we conducted a qualitative synthesis using the meta-ethnographic method, which is a robust approach for synthesizing qualitative data. We systematically searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases for relevant articles using predefined search terms such as \"psoriatic arthritis,\" \"diagnosis,\" and \"primary care.\" The inclusion criteria were narrative articles in English that provided insights into the diagnostic challenges of PsA in primary care. Conference presentations, original articles, and duplicate articles were excluded. Our analysis revealed four key themes that elucidated the multifaceted nature of PsA diagnosis in primary care: (1) a variety of initial and non-specific symptoms, highlighting the diverse clinical presentations that can mimic other conditions; (2) the lack of experience with PsA among primary care professionals, underscoring the importance of education and training; (3) the lack of skin lesions, which can complicate diagnosis when not present; and (4) a delay in diagnosis, with potentially severe consequences for patients\' health and quality of life. This study highlights the challenges inherent in the diagnosis of PsA in primary care settings. The multifaceted nature of the disease, coupled with limited experience among primary care providers, often results in delayed diagnosis and subsequent treatment initiation. Early recognition and intervention are pivotal for optimizing patient outcomes. Addressing these challenges necessitates a comprehensive approach involving heightened clinical suspicion, continuous medical education, interdisciplinary collaboration, and utilization of standardized diagnostic criteria. Collaboration between primary care physicians and specialists is crucial for enhancing the accuracy and timeliness of PsA diagnosis and ultimately improving patient well-being and quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当患者从一个医疗保健部门过渡到另一个医疗保健部门时,通常会看到与药物相关的问题(DRP)。例如,当患者从医院转移到全科医生(GP)时。这种过渡为药物变化和后续计划的信息丢失创造了机会。制定了跨部门的医院药剂师干预措施,并在大型GP诊所进行了试点测试。干预包括用药史,药物和解,药物审查,后续电话,识别可能的DRP和与GP的通信。尚不清楚干预是否可转移到其他GP诊所。该研究的目的是探索GP诊所在描述性数据和干预可接受性方面的异同。
    使用会聚混合方法研究设计。干预措施在四个具有不同特征的GP诊所中进行了测试。关于全科医生诊所的定量数据,收集患者和药剂师活动。通过与全科医生的焦点小组访谈收集可接受性的定性数据,护士和药剂师。使用了可接受性的理论框架。
    总的来说,所有人都认为干预是可以接受和相关的。全科医生诊所在规模上存在差异,日常医生工作表格及其使用药剂师的临时任务。GP诊所的患者特征相似。因此,该干预措施与所有诊所同样相关.在这两个部门中,共享就业并独特地获取健康记录对于识别和解决DRP很重要。经济是进一步执行的障碍。
    所有人都认为干预是可以接受和相关的;因此,它被认为可以转移到其他GP诊所.医院药剂师被认为是在全科医生中使用的相关医疗保健专业人员,在医院和患者的跨部门过渡中。
    在医院和全科医生之间过渡的患者中,药剂师活动的可接受性为什么进行了这项研究?与药物相关的问题经常出现在跨医疗保健部门过渡的患者中。在大型全科医生(GP)诊所中开发并进行了药剂师活动的试点测试。尚不清楚该活动是否可转移到其他GP诊所。药剂师的活动包括与患者讨论他们通常的药物和相应的调整处方。药剂师活动还包括对他们的药物进行审查,在药物相关问题的情况下,给患者打电话并与全科医生沟通。该研究的目的是测试不同GP诊所的活动,并探索描述性数据和可接受性的异同。研究人员做了什么?该活动在同一地理区域内的四个GP诊所进行了三个月的测试。关于全科医生诊所的描述性数据,收集患者和药剂师的活动。有关活动可接受性的数据是通过与全科医生的焦点小组访谈收集的,护士和医院药剂师。将这些定性数据与描述性数据相结合,以探索GP诊所之间的异同。研究人员发现了什么?总的来说,这项活动被所有人认为是可以接受和相关的。全科医生诊所在规模上存在差异,日常医生工作表格及其使用药剂师的临时任务。GP诊所的患者之间存在相似之处,例如在药物数量或药物相关问题方面。发现该活动与每个诊所同等相关。在这两个部门中共享就业并获得健康记录对于确定和解决与毒品有关的问题很重要。药剂师有可能在医院和全科医生诊所之间来回解决问题。经济是进一步执行的障碍。调查结果是什么意思?这项活动被所有人认为是可以接受和相关的;因此,它被认为可以转移到其他GP诊所.医院药剂师被认为是在全科医生中使用的相关医疗保健专业人员,在医院和患者的跨部门过渡中。
    UNASSIGNED: Drug-related problems (DRPs) are often seen when a patient is transitioning from one healthcare sector to another, for example, when a patient moves from the hospital to a General Practice (GP) setting. This transition creates an opportunity for information on medication changes and follow-up plans to be lost. A cross-sectoral hospital pharmacist intervention was developed and pilot-tested in a large GP clinic. The intervention included medication history, medication reconciliation, medication review, follow-up telephone calls, identification of possible DRPs and communication with the GP. It is unknown whether the intervention is transferable to other GP clinics. The aim of the study was to explore similarities and differences between GP clinics in descriptive data and intervention acceptability.
    UNASSIGNED: A convergent mixed methods study design was used. The intervention was tested in four GP clinics with differing characteristics. Quantitative data on the GP clinics, patients and pharmacist activities were collected. Qualitative data on the acceptability were collected through focus group interviews with general practitioners, nurses and pharmacists. The Theoretical Framework of Acceptability was used.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, the intervention was found acceptable and relevant by all. There were differences between the GP clinics in terms of size, daily physician work form and their use of pharmacists for ad hoc tasks. There were similarities in patient characteristics across GP clinics. Therefore, the intervention was found equally relevant for all of the clinics. Shared employment with unique access to health records in both sectors was important in the identification and resolution of DRPs. Economy was a barrier for further implementation.
    UNASSIGNED: The intervention was found acceptable and relevant by all; therefore, it was considered transferable to other GP clinics. Hospital pharmacists were perceived to be relevant healthcare professionals to be utilized in GP, in hospitals and in the cross-sectoral transition of patients.
    Acceptability of a pharmacist activity for patients transitioning between hospital and general practice Why was the study done? Drug-related problems are often seen in patients transitioning across healthcare sectors. A pharmacist activity was developed and pilot-tested in a large General Practice (GP) clinic. It was unknown whether the activity was transferable to other GP clinics.The pharmacist activity included talking to the patients about their usual medication and adjustment of prescriptions accordingly. The pharmacist activity also included a review of their medications, a follow-up telephone call to the patients and communication with the GP in case of drug-related problems.The aim of the study was to test the activity in different GP clinics and to explore similarities and differences in descriptive data and acceptability. What did the researchers do? The activity was tested in four GP clinics within the same geographical area for three months.Descriptive data about the GP clinics, the patients and the pharmacist’s activities performed were collected.Data about acceptability of the activity was collected through focus group interviews with general practitioners, nurses and hospital pharmacists.This qualitative data was combined with descriptive data to explore similarities and differences between GP clinics. What did the researchers find? Overall, the activity was found to be acceptable and relevant by all.There were differences between the GP clinics in terms of size, daily physician work form and their use of the pharmacist for ad hoc tasks.There were similarities in patients across GP clinics e.g. in terms of the number of medications or drug-related problems. The activity was found equally relevant for every clinic.Shared employment with access to health records in both sectors was important in the identification and resolution of drug-related problems. The pharmacist had the possibility to bring issues back and forth between the hospital and the GP clinic.Economy was a barrier for further implementation. What do the findings mean? The activity was found acceptable and relevant by all; therefore, it was considered transferable to other GP clinics.Hospital pharmacists were perceived to be relevant healthcare professionals to be utilised in GP, in hospitals and in the cross-sectoral transition of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在全科医生(GP)和药剂师之间建立专业间的工作关系对于确保高质量的患者护理至关重要。然而,关于GP-药剂师合作的中国文献有限,很少有研究探索全科医生将药剂师整合到一般实践中的经验。本研究旨在调查全科医生对与中国药剂师合作的态度和频率。
    方法:这项横断面研究使用了在线自我管理问卷,整合了两个量表,ATCI-GP和FICI-GP,经翻译和验证,于2023年2月15日至3月15日在浙江省调查了3248名全科医生,中国。使用描述性分析,并使用logistic回归分析探讨了与全科医生与药剂师合作频率相关的因素。
    结果:共有2,487名全科医生(76.6%)回答并同意参加调查;52.3%为男性,平均年龄为35.4岁。大多数全科医生同意在照顾患者时与药剂师共享共同的目标和目标(90.0%),药剂师愿意与他们合作进行患者的药物管理(80.8%)。然而,一半的全科医生在药剂师的建议下没有改变或很少改变患者的药物(51.4%).Logistic回归分析显示,年龄较大、执业年限较多的全科医生更倾向于认同药剂师愿意合作,有共同的治疗目标,他们会根据药剂师的建议改变病人的药物治疗。具有常规通信协议的全科医生(调整后的赔率比1[aOR1]=1.88,95%CI1.45-2.45;aOR2=3.33,95%CI2.76-4.02),参加联合继续教育(aOR1=1.87,95%CI1.44-2.43;aOR2=2.27,95%CI1.91-2.70),提供药物审查建议(aOR1=3.01,95%CI2.07-4.38;aOR2=3.50,95%CI2.51-4.86),在住院医师培训期间与药剂师沟通(aOR1=2.15,95%CI1.78-2.60;aOR2=1.38,95%CI1.18-1.62)与更积极的合作态度和更高的合作频率相关。
    结论:中国的全科医生对与药师合作表现出积极的态度,但是他们没有表现出类似的实践水平。由于环境决定因素影响跨学科合作,医疗保健管理者和政策制定者需要采取措施,营造有利于跨学科合作的支持性环境。
    BACKGROUND: Building interprofessional working relationships between general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists is essential to ensure high-quality patient care. However, there is limited Chinese literature on GP-pharmacist collaboration, and few studies have explored GPs\' experiences with pharmacist integration into general practices. This study aimed to investigate GPs\' attitudes towards and frequency of collaboration with pharmacists in China.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study used an online self-administered questionnaire integrating two scales, ATCI-GP and FICI-GP, which had been translated and validated to investigate 3,248 GPs from February 15 to March 15, 2023 across Zhejiang Province, China. Descriptive analyses were used, and the factors associated with GPs\' frequency of collaboration with pharmacists were explored using logistic regression analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 2,487 GPs (76.6%) responded and consented to participate in the survey; 52.3% were male and the mean age was 35.4 years. Most GPs agreed that they shared common goals and objectives with pharmacists when caring for patients (90.0%), and pharmacists were open to working with them on patients\' medication management (80.8%). However, half of the GPs did not change or seldom changed the patient\'s medication on the pharmacist\'s advice (51.4%). Logistic regression analysis showed that GPs who were older and had more years of practice were more likely to agree that pharmacists were willing to collaborate, had common goals for treatment and that they would change the patient\'s medication on the advice of the pharmacist. GPs who had regular communication protocols (adjusted odds ratio1 [aOR1] = 1.88, 95% CI 1.45-2.45; aOR2 = 3.33, 95% CI 2.76-4.02), participated in joint continuing education (aOR1 = 1.87, 95% CI 1.44-2.43; aOR2 = 2.27, 95% CI 1.91-2.70), provided recommendations for medication review (aOR1 = 3.01, 95% CI 2.07-4.38; aOR2 = 3.50, 95% CI 2.51-4.86), and communicated with pharmacists during resident training (aOR1 = 2.15, 95% CI 1.78-2.60; aOR2 = 1.38, 95% CI 1.18-1.62) were associated with a more positive attitude towards and higher frequency of cooperation.
    CONCLUSIONS: GPs in China displayed a positive attitude towards cooperating with pharmacists, but they did not demonstrate a similar level of practice. As environmental determinants impact interdisciplinary collaboration, healthcare managers and policy-makers need to implement measures that foster a supportive environment conducive to interdisciplinary collaboration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:世界各地的政策制定者和医院董事会已经采取了不同的措施来建立和维持有效的医院与医生的关系。荷兰的“综合资金”政策改革旨在提高医院与医生的一致性,并导致无法预见的医学专业企业(MSE)的形成:代表医院中所有自雇医生的财政实体。尚不清楚医院和MSEs如何看待他们的联盟以及他们如何管理这种关系。本研究探讨了医院与MSE的关系,以及治理风格如何影响这种关系中感知的一致性。
    方法:对荷兰五家非学术医院进行了多案例研究。数据来自两个来源:(1)医院-MSE合同分析和(2)对医院和MSE董事会成员的半结构化访谈。使用预定义的合同分析模板对合同进行了分析。采访录音被转录,随后使用敏感概念方法进行编码。
    结果:合同,关系特征,不同案例之间的治理风格和感知一致性有很大差异。五份合约中有两份是预防合约,一个是混合型的,还有两个是促销合同。然而,在所有情况下,合同在这种关系中都没有作用。医院之间激励措施的使用差异很大;大多数激励措施是经济处罚。两家医院的治理风格在合同之间有所不同,混合为一家医院,主要为两家医院。制定共享业务战略被认为是关系治理的重要驱动力,这被认为可以促进对齐。
    结论:在关系特征方面观察到很大的变化,治理和感知的一致性。MSE的形成被认为是通过团结医生促进了医院-医生的对齐,提高医生的管理责任,加强财务协调,制定共享业务战略。发现关系治理促进了医院和MSE之间的密集合作,因此可以改善医院与医生关系的一致性。
    Policy-makers and hospital boards throughout the world have implemented different measures to create and sustain effective hospital-physician relationships. The \'integrated funding\' policy reform in the Netherlands was aimed at increasing hospital-physician alignment and led to the unforeseen formation of medical specialist enterprises (MSEs): a fiscal entity representing all self-employed physicians in a hospital. It is unknown how hospitals and MSEs perceive their alignment and how they govern the relationship. This study explores the hospital-MSE relationship, and how governance styles influence perceived alignment in this relationship.
    A multiple case study of five non-academic hospitals in the Netherlands was performed. Data was derived from two sources: (1) analysis of hospital-MSE contracts and (2) semi-structured interviews with hospital and MSE board members. Contracts were analysed using a predefined contract analysis template. Interview recordings were transcribed and subsequently coded using the sensitizing concepts approach.
    Contracts, relational characteristics, governance styles and perceived alignment differed substantially between cases. Two out of five contracts were prevention contracts, one was a mixed type, and two were promotion contracts. However, in all cases the contract played no role in the relationship. The use of incentives varied widely between the hospitals; most incentives were financial penalties. The governance style varied between contractual for two hospitals, mixed for one hospital and predominantly relational for two hospitals. Development of a shared business strategy was identified as an important driver of relational governance, which was perceived to boost alignment.
    Large variation was observed regarding relational characteristics, governance and perceived alignment. MSE formation was perceived to have contributed to hospital-physician alignment by uniting physicians, boosting physicians\' managerial responsibilities, increasing financial alignment and developing shared business strategies. Relational governance was found to promote intensive collaboration between hospital and MSE, and thus may improve alignment in the hospital-physician relationship.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在COVID-19大流行期间,公共卫生挑战迅速升级。为了应对芝加哥西郊严重缺乏资源和支持,COVID公平响应协作:洛约拉(CERCL)由芝加哥洛约拉大学学生的跨专业团队建立,工作人员,和教员。CERCL试图尽量减少COVID-19对弱势社区的负面影响,那些基本上是黑色的,西班牙裔,或低收入。从2020年4月至今,协作利用社区-学术伙伴关系和跨学科合作进行编程。CERCL的编程包括免费的基于社区的测试,筛查和协助健康的社会决定因素,传播相关和可靠的COVID相关信息,提供个人防护设备,和便利获得疫苗。与合作伙伴,合作进行了1500项COVID-19测试,培训了80个人进行接触者追踪,为100多名个人提供了专门定制的资源,以满足社会和法律需求,分发了5000个资源袋,举行了20次社区对话,调查了3,735所房屋,并接待了19个疫苗诊所。与卫生系统的社区-学术伙伴关系,社区和政府机构,当地公共卫生部门对CERCL的努力至关重要。在这个案例研究中证明的跨学科和跨专业的成功提供了一个相关的例子,可持续,和实际干预,以解决微妙的公共卫生问题。
    Public health challenges rapidly escalated during the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to a severe lack of resources and support in the near western suburbs of Chicago, the COVID Equity Response Collaborative: Loyola (CERCL) was established by an interprofessional team of Loyola University Chicago students, staff, and faculty. CERCL sought to minimize the negative impact of COVID-19 on vulnerable communities, those that are largely Black, Hispanic, or low-income. From April 2020 to the present, the collaborative utilized community-academic partnerships and interdisciplinary collaborations to conduct programming. CERCL\'s programming included free community-based testing, screening for and assistance with social determinants of health, dissemination of relevant and reliable COVID-related information, provision of personal protective equipment, and facilitation of access to vaccines. With partners, the collaborative conducted 1,500 COVID-19 tests, trained 80 individuals in contact tracing, provided over 100 individuals with specifically tailored resources to address social and legal needs, distributed 5,000 resource bags, held 20 community conversations, canvassed 3,735 homes, and hosted 19 vaccine clinics. Community-academic partnerships with the health system, community and governmental agencies, and the local public health department have been critical to CERCL efforts. The interdisciplinary and interprofessional successes demonstrated in this case study lends the example of a relevant, sustainable, and practical intervention to address nuanced public health issues.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号