Interdisciplinary collaboration

跨学科合作
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    纳米医学代表了生物医学应用中的一种变革性方法。本研讨旨在经由过程优势来划定纳米医学在生物医学范畴的运用,弱点,机遇,和威胁(SWOT)分析,以评估其在临床应用中的功效和潜力。
    SWOT分析框架被用来系统地审查和评估内部的优势和劣势,以及纳米医学的外部机遇和威胁。该方法提供了对潜在益处和挑战的平衡考虑。
    SWOT分析的结果表明,纳米药物在药物递送方面具有巨大潜力,诊断成像,和组织工程。尽管如此,它面临着巨大的障碍,如安全问题,环境问题,和高开发成本。确定了关键的发展领域,特别是关于其治疗潜力和长期影响的不确定性。
    纳米医学在推动医学创新方面具有广阔的前景。然而,成功的临床翻译需要解决安全性,成本,和监管挑战。跨学科协作和综合战略规划对于纳米医学的安全有效应用至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: Nanomedicine represents a transformative approach in biomedical applications. This study aims to delineate the application of nanomedicine in the biomedical field through the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis to evaluate its efficacy and potential in clinical applications.
    UNASSIGNED: The SWOT analysis framework was employed to systematically review and assess the internal strengths and weaknesses, along with external opportunities and threats of nanomedicine. This method provides a balanced consideration of the potential benefits and challenges.
    UNASSIGNED: Findings from the SWOT analysis indicate that nanomedicine presents significant potential in drug delivery, diagnostic imaging, and tissue engineering. Nonetheless, it faces substantial hurdles such as safety issues, environmental concerns, and high development costs. Critical areas for development were identified, particularly concerning its therapeutic potential and the uncertainties surrounding long-term effects.
    UNASSIGNED: Nanomedicine holds substantial promise in driving medical innovation. However, successful clinical translation requires addressing safety, cost, and regulatory challenges. Interdisciplinary collaboration and comprehensive strategic planning are crucial for the safe and effective application of nanomedicine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    院前急救护理是医疗保健的一个关键但往往缺乏研究的方面。这种情况下的患者脆弱性会显著影响结果。这项研究的目的是调查中国院前急诊患者的脆弱性状况并确定相关影响因素。
    在中国进行的这项横断面研究中,从2023年4月到2023年7月,我们使用院前急诊护理安全指数(SPECI)量表评估了院前急诊患者的脆弱性。我们进行了详细的问卷调查,以收集人口统计学和疾病相关信息。我们采用了SPECI量表,由两个分量表组成,评估患者的脆弱性。统计分析,包括t检验,方差分析,和多元线性回归,用于识别与脆弱性相关的因素。
    该研究共包括973名院前急诊患者,有效率为81.9%。这些患者表现出低至中等水平的脆弱性,SPECI平均得分为14.46,满分40分。脆弱性与年龄(尤其是60岁及以上的年龄)显着相关,疾病严重程度(严重状况增加脆弱性),疾病类型(与较高脆弱性相关的循环系统疾病),意识的改变,和慢性疾病。出乎意料的是,消化系统疾病与易损性呈负相关。
    在院前护理中解决患者的脆弱性至关重要。量身定制的干预措施,EMS提供商培训,跨学科合作可以减轻脆弱性,特别是在老年患者和那些有严重的条件。
    Prehospital emergency care is a critical but often understudied aspect of healthcare. Patient vulnerability in this setting can significantly impact outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the vulnerability status and to determine associated affect factors among prehospital emergency patients in China.
    In this cross-sectional study conducted in China, from April 2023 to July 2023, we assessed the vulnerability of prehospital emergency patients using the Safety in Prehospital Emergency Care Index (SPECI) scale. We conducted a detailed questionnaire-based survey to gather demographic and disease-related information. We employed the SPECI scale, consisting of two subscales, to evaluate patient vulnerability. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression, were used to identify factors associated with vulnerability.
    The study included a total of 973 prehospital emergency patients, with a response rate of 81.9%. These patients exhibited a low-to-moderate level of vulnerability, with an average SPECI score of 14.46 out of 40. Vulnerability was significantly associated with age (particularly those aged 60 and above), disease severity (severe conditions increased vulnerability), disease type (circulatory diseases correlated with higher vulnerability), alterations in consciousness, and chronic diseases. Unexpectedly, digestive system diseases were negatively correlated with vulnerability.
    Addressing patient vulnerability in prehospital care is essential. Tailored interventions, EMS provider training, and interdisciplinary collaboration can mitigate vulnerability, especially in older patients and those with severe conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    跨学科合作是音乐教育中新兴的当务之急,但是目前对全球实践的理解仍然有限。先前的研究仅集中在有限地理区域内的特定程序上。然而,机构和地区之间的倡议的定量映射最少。解释区域差异的上下文见解也很少。因此,这项研究旨在通过对跨学科项目进行全面分析来解决这些差距,伙伴关系,事件,以及使用混合方法方法的全球领先音乐机构的出版物。分析揭示了各地区生产率的模型和决定因素的显着多样性。例如,虽然欧洲在正式一体化和研究成果方面处于领先地位,北美优先考虑通过媒体和新兴工具实现的技术创新。伙伴关系无处不在,但重点领域和课程整合各不相同。研究结果揭示了全球跨学科教育实践和形式的显着多样性,这意味着需要根据体制优势进行背景化的实施,而不是一刀切的方法。因此,随着音乐教育的发展,建议将本地优先事项与全球最佳实践相结合的量身定制的跨学科策略,以创造性地培养多方面的技能并最大程度地发挥创新潜力。因此,这项研究为基于证据的信息提供了一个宝贵的知识库,培养尖端人才的灵活政策和框架,全球范围内参与社会的音乐家和企业。
    Interdisciplinary collaboration is an emerging imperative in music education, but current understanding of global practices remains limited. Prior studies have focused narrowly on specific programs within limited geographic areas. However, there is minimal quantitative mapping of initiatives across institutions and regions. Contextual insights explaining regional variations are also scarce. Hence, this study aims to address these gaps by conducting a comprehensive analysis of interdisciplinary programs, partnerships, events, and publications across leading global music institutions using a mixed methods approach. The analysis reveals significant diversity in models and determinants of productivity across regions. For instance, while Europe leads in formal integration and research output, North America prioritizes technology-enabled innovation through media and emerging tools. Partnerships are ubiquitous but focus areas and curricular integration vary. The findings reveal significant diversity in interdisciplinary education practices and formats worldwide, implying a need for contextualized implementation aligned to institutional strengths rather than a one-size-fits-all approach. Therefore, as music education evolves, tailored interdisciplinary strategies that blend local priorities with global best practices are recommended to creatively nurture multifaceted skills and maximize potential for innovation. Thus, this research contributes an invaluable knowledge base to inform evidence-based, nimble policies and frameworks for cultivating cutting-edge, socially engaged musicians and ventures worldwide.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在全科医生(GP)和药剂师之间建立专业间的工作关系对于确保高质量的患者护理至关重要。然而,关于GP-药剂师合作的中国文献有限,很少有研究探索全科医生将药剂师整合到一般实践中的经验。本研究旨在调查全科医生对与中国药剂师合作的态度和频率。
    方法:这项横断面研究使用了在线自我管理问卷,整合了两个量表,ATCI-GP和FICI-GP,经翻译和验证,于2023年2月15日至3月15日在浙江省调查了3248名全科医生,中国。使用描述性分析,并使用logistic回归分析探讨了与全科医生与药剂师合作频率相关的因素。
    结果:共有2,487名全科医生(76.6%)回答并同意参加调查;52.3%为男性,平均年龄为35.4岁。大多数全科医生同意在照顾患者时与药剂师共享共同的目标和目标(90.0%),药剂师愿意与他们合作进行患者的药物管理(80.8%)。然而,一半的全科医生在药剂师的建议下没有改变或很少改变患者的药物(51.4%).Logistic回归分析显示,年龄较大、执业年限较多的全科医生更倾向于认同药剂师愿意合作,有共同的治疗目标,他们会根据药剂师的建议改变病人的药物治疗。具有常规通信协议的全科医生(调整后的赔率比1[aOR1]=1.88,95%CI1.45-2.45;aOR2=3.33,95%CI2.76-4.02),参加联合继续教育(aOR1=1.87,95%CI1.44-2.43;aOR2=2.27,95%CI1.91-2.70),提供药物审查建议(aOR1=3.01,95%CI2.07-4.38;aOR2=3.50,95%CI2.51-4.86),在住院医师培训期间与药剂师沟通(aOR1=2.15,95%CI1.78-2.60;aOR2=1.38,95%CI1.18-1.62)与更积极的合作态度和更高的合作频率相关。
    结论:中国的全科医生对与药师合作表现出积极的态度,但是他们没有表现出类似的实践水平。由于环境决定因素影响跨学科合作,医疗保健管理者和政策制定者需要采取措施,营造有利于跨学科合作的支持性环境。
    BACKGROUND: Building interprofessional working relationships between general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists is essential to ensure high-quality patient care. However, there is limited Chinese literature on GP-pharmacist collaboration, and few studies have explored GPs\' experiences with pharmacist integration into general practices. This study aimed to investigate GPs\' attitudes towards and frequency of collaboration with pharmacists in China.
    METHODS: This cross-sectional study used an online self-administered questionnaire integrating two scales, ATCI-GP and FICI-GP, which had been translated and validated to investigate 3,248 GPs from February 15 to March 15, 2023 across Zhejiang Province, China. Descriptive analyses were used, and the factors associated with GPs\' frequency of collaboration with pharmacists were explored using logistic regression analysis.
    RESULTS: A total of 2,487 GPs (76.6%) responded and consented to participate in the survey; 52.3% were male and the mean age was 35.4 years. Most GPs agreed that they shared common goals and objectives with pharmacists when caring for patients (90.0%), and pharmacists were open to working with them on patients\' medication management (80.8%). However, half of the GPs did not change or seldom changed the patient\'s medication on the pharmacist\'s advice (51.4%). Logistic regression analysis showed that GPs who were older and had more years of practice were more likely to agree that pharmacists were willing to collaborate, had common goals for treatment and that they would change the patient\'s medication on the advice of the pharmacist. GPs who had regular communication protocols (adjusted odds ratio1 [aOR1] = 1.88, 95% CI 1.45-2.45; aOR2 = 3.33, 95% CI 2.76-4.02), participated in joint continuing education (aOR1 = 1.87, 95% CI 1.44-2.43; aOR2 = 2.27, 95% CI 1.91-2.70), provided recommendations for medication review (aOR1 = 3.01, 95% CI 2.07-4.38; aOR2 = 3.50, 95% CI 2.51-4.86), and communicated with pharmacists during resident training (aOR1 = 2.15, 95% CI 1.78-2.60; aOR2 = 1.38, 95% CI 1.18-1.62) were associated with a more positive attitude towards and higher frequency of cooperation.
    CONCLUSIONS: GPs in China displayed a positive attitude towards cooperating with pharmacists, but they did not demonstrate a similar level of practice. As environmental determinants impact interdisciplinary collaboration, healthcare managers and policy-makers need to implement measures that foster a supportive environment conducive to interdisciplinary collaboration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19大流行给跨学科的学者和研究学生带来了适应新的交流方式的许多不确定性和挑战。与同一领域的其他学者相比,跨学科学者在从传统的面对面交流向虚拟交流过渡时可能面临更多挑战。
    本研究旨在探讨在大流行期间,在经验丰富的跨学科学者(N=10)和年轻的研究学生(N=14)中使用西方和中国本地化交流渠道的痛苦和喜悦。其中,14人是欧洲人,10人是中国人。
    会议记录和参与者的反思性写作被用作定性数据。
    我们确定了五个关键主题:两个主题与个人和行为问题有关,两个涉及管理问题,一个涉及主题选择问题。
    考虑到在大流行后时期,虚拟的跨学科团队合作可能会继续,有必要实施技术培训和自愿助理等措施,以帮助缓解一些使与会者难以参加虚拟会议的问题。还讨论了研究的局限性和未来的发展方向。
    UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought interdisciplinary academics and research students many uncertainties and challenges in adapting to new communication styles. Compared with other academics in the same field, interdisciplinary academics might face more challenges in transitioning from traditional face-to-face communication to virtual communication.
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to explore the pain and joy of using Western and Chinese localized communication channels in experienced interdisciplinary academics (N = 10) and young research students (N = 14) during the pandemic. Among them, 14 are Europeans and 10 are Chinese.
    UNASSIGNED: Meeting records and participants\' reflective writing were used as qualitative data.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified five key themes: two were tied to personal and behavioral issues, two were involved in management issues, and one dealt with topic choice issues.
    UNASSIGNED: Considering that virtual interdisciplinary teamwork is likely to continue in the post-pandemic period, it is necessary to implement measures such as technical training and voluntary assistants to help alleviate some of the issues that make virtual meetings difficult for participants. Study limitations and future directions are also discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经评估:药剂师是许多发达国家疼痛管理跨学科团队的关键成员。然而,我国疼痛医师与专门从事疼痛管理的临床药师之间的不平衡阻碍了临床药学服务在疼痛管理中的实施。这项研究的目的是阐明人们的看法,中国疼痛医生对临床药学服务的期望和当前经验。
    未经评估:匿名者,自编问卷是根据先前发表的研究设计的,并进行了较小的修改,并于2021年在中国大陆所有31个省份的医院中随机抽取了1100名疼痛医生.使用描述性和推断性统计学对数据进行分析。
    UNASSIGNED:共纳入1071份有效问卷进行分析。疼痛医生来自中国大陆31个省,其中大多数来自拥有本科学位的三级医院。在列出的临床药学服务中,疼痛医生对药剂师治疗轻微疾病不太满意(p<0.001).疼痛医生在临床药学服务方面的经验远低于他们的预期(p<0.001),这与大多数疼痛医生(65.9%)与药剂师的互动频率低于每周一次的结果一致。疼痛医生的年龄(p<0.01)和工作年限(p<0.05)之间的经验存在显着差异。疼痛医师对药剂师的期望与其临床药学服务经验呈正相关(p<0.001)。
    未经授权:中国的疼痛医生有着积极的看法和很高的期望,但在临床药学服务方面的经验相对较低。扩大临床药师疼痛管理证书和增加疼痛医师接触临床药学服务有利于支持中国疼痛管理的跨学科合作。
    UNASSIGNED: Pharmacists are key members of the pain management interdisciplinary team in many developed countries. However, the implementation of clinical pharmacy services in pain management is impeded by the imbalance between the pain physicians and clinical pharmacists specializing in pain management in China. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the perceptions, expectations and current experience of Chinese pain physicians regarding clinical pharmacy services.
    UNASSIGNED: An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was designed according to previously published studies with minor modifications and distributed online to 1100 pain physicians selected randomly in hospitals across all 31 provinces of mainland China in 2021. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 1071 valid questionnaires were included for analysis. The pain physicians were from all 31 provinces of mainland China and most of them were from tertiary hospitals holding an undergraduate degree. Among listed kinds of clinical pharmacy services, pain physicians were less comfortable with pharmacists treating minor illnesses (p < 0.001). Pain physicians\' experiences with clinical pharmacy services were far less than their expectations (p < 0.001), which is in line with the results that most of pain physicians (65.9%) interacted with pharmacists at a frequency of less than once a week. Significant differences in the experiences were found among ages (p < 0.01) and among years of work experience (p < 0.05) of pain physicians. Pain physicians\' expectations of pharmacists were positively correlated with their experiences with clinical pharmacy services (p < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Pain physicians in China had positive perceptions and high expectations, but relatively low experiences regarding clinical pharmacy services. Expanding clinical pharmacist pain management credentialing and increasing pain physicians\' exposure to clinical pharmacy services are favourable to support the interdisciplinary collaboration in pain management in China.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了成功实现联合国可持续发展目标,跟踪联合国可持续发展目标的进展,并确定差距和需要更多关注的领域,各国对“可持续性研究”的定期分析及其对该主题的贡献是不可避免的。本文跟踪了可持续性研究的趋势,包括可持续性研究的地理分布,他们的多学科水平和跨境合作,他们对联合国可持续发展目标的资金分配,和生命周期分析。关于可持续性的累积出版物和专利可以拟合为指数函数,从而突出了最近对可持续性研究的重要性。此外,这种分析量化的跨境合作和知识整合,以解决关键问题,以及传统和新兴来源进行可持续发展研究。作为资源可持续发展和循环经济的重要方面,还调查了生命周期评估的出版和供资趋势。这里的分析表明,主要的可持续发展研究量来自社会科学以及商业和经济部门,而工程学科对开发可持续发展实践技术的贡献相对较低。同样,在各种可持续发展目标下,资金分配也不是均匀分布的;更大份额的资金用于能源安全和气候变化研究。因此,这项研究确定了许多需要填补的空白,以使联合国可持续发展目标取得成功。
    For a successful delivery of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs) and to track the progress of UNSDGs as well as identify the gaps and the areas requiring more attention, periodic analyses on the \"research on sustainability\" by various countries and their contribution to the topic are inevitable. This paper tracks the trends in sustainability research including the geographical distribution on sustainability research, their level of multi-disciplinarity and the cross-border collaboration, their distribution of funding with respect to the UNSDGs, and the lifecycle analyses. Cumulative publications and patents on sustainability could be fitted to an exponential function, thereby highlighting the importance of the research on sustainability in the recent past. Besides, this analytics quantifies cross-border collaborations and knowledge integration to solve critical issues as well as traditional and emerging sources to undertake sustainability research. As an important aspect of resource sustainability and circular economy, trends in publication and funding on lifecycle assessment have also been investigated. The analytics present here identify that major sustainability research volume is from the social sciences as well as business and economics sectors, whereas contributions from the engineering disciplines to develop technologies for sustainability practices are relatively lower. Similarly, funding distribution is also not evenly distributed under various SDGs; the larger share of funding has been on energy security and climate change research. Thus, this study identifies many gaps to be filled for the UNSDGs to be successful.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Due to the rapid advancements in precision medicine and artificial intelligence, interdisciplinary collaborations between nursing and engineering have emerged. Although engineering is vital in solving complex nursing problems and advancing healthcare, the collaboration between the two fields has not been fully elucidated.
    OBJECTIVE: To identify the study areas of interdisciplinary collaboration between nursing and engineering in health care, particularly focusing on the role of nurses in the collaboration.
    METHODS: In this study, a scoping review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Reviews was performed. A comprehensive search for published literature was conducted using the PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Digital Library, and Association for Computing Machinery Digital Library from inception to November 22, 2020. Data screening and extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Any discrepancies in results were resolved through discussions or in consultation with a third reviewer. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics and content analysis. Results were visualized in an interdisciplinary collaboration model.
    RESULTS: We identified 6,752 studies through the literature search, and 60 studies met the inclusion criteria. The study areas of interdisciplinary collaboration concentrated on patient safety (n = 18), symptom monitoring and health management (n = 18), information system and nursing human resource management (n = 16), health education (n = 5), and nurse-patient communication (n = 3). The roles of nurses in the interdisciplinary collaboration were divided into four themes: requirement analyst (n = 21), designer (n = 22), tester(n = 37) and evaluator (n = 49). Based on these results, an interdisciplinary collaboration model was constructed.
    CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary collaborations between nursing and engineering promote nursing innovation and practice. However, these collaborations are still emerging and in the early stages. In the future, nurses should be more involved in the early stages of solving healthcare problems, particularly in the requirement analysis and designing phases. Furthermore, there is an urgent need to develop interprofessional education, strengthen nursing connections with the healthcare engineering industry, and provide more platforms and resources to bring nursing and engineering disciplines together.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: According to the literature, 74%-84% of patients in adult critical care units have an indwelling catheter. The majority of medical and healthcare infections are urinary tract infections, which are related to urinary catheter usage. Furthermore, critical infections may cause bacteremia, which increases the risk of mortality. Prior to this project, over three-quarters (78.7%) of patients in our unit used a urinary catheter, which is a rate that is higher than all other intensive care units of our hospital\'s internal medicine department. Due to Foley placement, removal and care of catheters requires collaboration of teamwork. Thus, the concept of team resource management may be applied to improve the situation.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to reduce the urinary catheter usage rate in our intensive care unit to less than 69.3%.
    UNASSIGNED: This project summarized the reasons for the high catheter usage rate in this unit on 2017/1/3 and implemented several approaches to improve the situation from 2017/2/1 to 2017/6/30. These approaches included affixing reminder labels to indwelling catheters, using an ultrasound bladder scanner as a substitute for intermittent catheterization, evaluating indwelling catheters, establishing flow planning for post-catheter removal, holding cross-team meetings, and adopting a reward system. During the improvement period, we held collaborative conference meetings weekly to discuss solutions, evaluate end-of-the-month progress, and set reward policies.
    RESULTS: We lowered the average urinary catheter usage rate from 78.7% on 2017/3/1 to 57.8% on 2017/6/30, achieving a 26.5% reduction in catheter usage.
    CONCLUSIONS: This project both effectively reduced the unnecessary use of urinary catheters and significantly strengthened team spirit in our unit, thus improving the quality of medical care provided.
    BACKGROUND: 運用團隊資源管理降低加護病房導尿管使用率.
    UNASSIGNED: 文獻指出加護病房住院病人中74%–84%曾使用過導尿管,醫療健康照護感染以泌尿道感染居多,且與導尿管使用密切相關,嚴重可能導致菌血症,使死亡率提高。本單位年平均導尿管使用率78.7%,高於院內其他內科系加護病房,考量導尿管置放、移除與照護,需仰賴跨團隊合作完成,故需運用團隊資源管理(team resource management)概念進行專案改善。.
    UNASSIGNED: 降低加護病房導尿管使用率至69.3%以下。.
    UNASSIGNED: 2017/1/3調查單位導尿管使用率高之原因,並於2017/2/1至2017/6/30提出並進行改善措施,包含:推動留置導尿管提醒標示、以超音波膀胱容量掃描儀代替間歇性導尿、協助執行留置導尿管評估單及移除導尿管後流程、過程中每週定期舉辦跨團隊會議,共同討論解決方案、當月份30日評值結果並執行獎勵制度。.
    UNASSIGNED: 2017/3/1至2017/6/30單位平均導尿管使用率由改善前78.7%降至57.8%,改善幅度為26.5%。.
    UNASSIGNED: 專案推行後不僅有效減少非必要導尿管使用,並強化團隊合作精神,提升醫療照護品質。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    With the widespread application of a robot to surgery, growing literature related to robotics in surgery (RS) documents widespread concerns from scientific researchers worldwide. Although such application is helpful to considerably improve the accuracy of surgery, we still lack the understanding of the multidiscipline-crossing status and topic distribution related to RS.
    The aim of this study was to detect the interdisciplinary nature and topic hotspots on RS by analyzing the current publication outputs related to RS.
    The authors collected publications related to RS in the last 21 years, indexed by the Web of Science Core Collection. Various bibliometric methods and tools were used, including literature distribution analysis at the country and institution level and interdisciplinary collaboration analysis in the different periods of time. Co-word analysis was performed based on the keywords with high frequency. The temporal visualization bar presented the evolution of topics over time.
    A total of 7732 bibliographic records related to RS were identified. The United States plays a leading role in the publication output related to RS, followed by Italy and Germany. It should be noted that the Yonsei University in South Korea published the highest number of RS-related publications. Furthermore, the interdisciplinary collaboration is uneven; the number of disciplines involved in each paper dropped from the initial 1.60 to the current 1.31. Surgery; Engineering; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Medical Imaging; and Neurosciences and Neurology are the 4 core disciplines in the field of RS, all of which have extensive cooperation with other disciplines. The distribution of topic hotspots is in imbalanced status, which can be categorized into 7 clusters. Moreover, 3 areas about the evolution of topic were identified, namely (1) the exploration of techniques that make RS implemented, (2) rapid development of robotic systems and related applications in surgery, and (3) application of a robot to excision of tissues or organs targeted at various specific diseases.
    This study provided important insights into the interdisciplinary nature related to RS, which indicates that the researchers with different disciplinary backgrounds should strengthen cooperation to publish a high-quality output. The research topic hotspots related to RS are relatively scattered, which has begun to turn to the application of RS targeted at specific diseases. Our study is helpful to provide a potential guide to the direction of the field of RS for future research in the field of RS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号