IPL

IPL
  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:干眼症(DED)是一种复杂的眼表炎症性疾病,具有多因素的病因。已经报道了诸如强脉冲光(IPL)和加热眼罩(HEM)的疗法改善泪膜脂质层(TFLL)和DED的体征和症状。方法:本随机研究旨在比较IPL联合HEM(IPL+HEM)组的疗效,IPL组,对照组为蒸发DED参与者。所有参与者在基线(D0)检查,第21天(D21),第42天(D42),第84天(D84)为非侵入性泪液破裂时间(NITBUT),TFLL,角膜结膜染色(CS),睑板腺质量(MGQ),睑板腺可表达性(MGEX),和眼表疾病指数(OSDI)。结果:参与者的平均年龄为IPL+HEM:28.06±3.88岁,IPL:29.88±4.68岁,和控制:28.52±3.77岁。在D84时,TFLL显着改善(p<0.05),无创性泪液破裂时间(NITBUT)(p<0.05),新结膜染色(CS)(p<0.05),MGQ(p<0.05),MGEX(p<0.05),在IPL+HEM和IPL组中发现OSDI(p<0.05),而对照组无显著改善。此外,ΔTFLL与ΔNITBUT显著相关(r=-0.678,p<0.001),ΔCS(r=0.321,p<0.001),ΔMGQ(r=0.669,p<0.001),ΔMGex(r=0.598,p<0.001),和ΔOSDI评分(r=0.649,p<0.001)。结论:IPL治疗联合HEM和IPL治疗只能显着提高TFLL的质量,并在临床上减轻蒸发性DED的体征和症状。然而,发现与HEM组合的IPL疗法比单独的IPL疗法更有效。
    Background: Dry eye disease (DED) is a complex ocular surface inflammatory disorder with a multifactorial etiology. Therapies such as intense pulsed light (IPL) and heated eye mask (HEM) have been reported to improve the tear film lipid layer (TFLL) and signs and symptoms of DED. Methods: This randomized study aimed to compare the effects of IPL combined with HEM (IPL+HEM) group, IPL group, and control group in participants with evaporative DED. All participants were examined at baseline (D0), day 21 (D21), day 42 (D42), and day 84 (D84) for noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT), TFLL, corneal conjunctival staining (CS), meibomian gland quality (MGQ), meibomian gland expressibility (MGEx), and Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Results: The mean age of participants was IPL+HEM: 28.06 ± 3.88 years, IPL: 29.88 ± 4.68 years, and control: 28.52 ± 3.77 years. At D84, significant improvements in TFLL (p < 0.05), noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT) (p < 0.05), corneoconjunctival staining (CS) (p < 0.05), MGQ (p < 0.05), MGEx (p < 0.05), and OSDI (p < 0.05) were found in the IPL+HEM and IPL groups, whereas the control group had no significant improvements. Furthermore, ΔTFLL significantly correlated with ΔNITBUT (r = -0.678, p < 0.001), ΔCS (r = 0.321, p < 0.001), ΔMGQ (r = 0.669, p < 0.001), ΔMGEx (r = 0.598, p < 0.001), and ΔOSDI score (r = 0.649, p < 0.001). Conclusions: IPL therapy in combination with HEM and IPL therapy only can significantly improve the quality of TFLL and clinically reduce the sign and symptoms of evaporative DED. However, IPL therapy in combination with HEM was found to be more effective than IPL therapy alone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:原发性腋窝多汗症(PAH)影响了1-5%的世界人口,他们对改善治疗的需求未得到满足。用特定的微波疗法加热汗腺已显示出有希望的结果,然而,使用广泛可用的设备进行治疗,例如长脉冲钕钇铝石榴石(Nd:YAG)激光器,二极管激光器或强脉冲光(IPL)可以作为实用的替代品。
    目的:比较PAH患者一次Nd:YAG激光或IPL治疗1-3个月后,治疗与未治疗对侧对照腋窝的汗液分泌。
    方法:人体内随机对照试验。患者被随机分配在一个腋下接受一次Nd:YAG激光或IPL,对侧作为对照。通过重力法评估出汗量,经表皮失水,多汗症疾病严重程度量表和动态光学相干断层扫描。混合效果模型被用来处理人内设计,包含两个固定效应因素(侧面,group,和子组),和随机效应(患者),同时也调整基线水平。
    结果:共纳入20例患者。治疗后1-3个月随访,与对照腋窝相比,经治疗的腋窝的汗液分泌不受影响(0.01[95CI:-0.04至0.05];p=0.68)。在Nd:YAG亚组(10例)中,汗液分泌的最小二乘平均值为0.18mg/5min,而对照组为0.15mg/5min,分别,对应于0.02mg/5min的统计学上无统计学意义的平均差异(95%CI:-0.06至0.11;p=0.54)。在IPL亚组(10名患者)中,经处理的腋下的汗液分泌为0.06mg/5分钟,而对照腋下的汗液分泌为0.07mg/5分钟,统计学上差异无统计学意义-0.01分(95%CI:-0.03至0.02;p=0.46)。同样,次要结局均未受到治疗的显著影响.然而,两种治疗均显示安全且耐受性良好,随访时无不良反应.
    结论:在市售设置下,使用外部1064nmNd:YAG激光或640nmIPL进行一次治疗,未能证明治疗PAH的临床益处,较窄的置信区间意味着这不是由于2型错误。
    Primary axillary hyperhidrosis (PAH) affects 1-5% of the world\'s population who has an unmet need for improved treatments. The heating of sweat glands with specific microwave therapy has shown promising results, yet, treatment with widely available devices such as long-pulsed Neodymium Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers, diode lasers or Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) may serve as pragmatic alternatives.
    To compare sweat secretion of treated versus untreated contralateral control axilla 1-3 months after one session of Nd:YAG laser or IPL in patients with PAH.
    A within-person randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to receive either one session of Nd:YAG laser or IPL in one axilla with the contra-lateral serving as control. Sweat production was assessed by gravimetry, trans-epidermal water loss, hyperhidrosis disease severity scale and dynamic optical coherence tomography. Mixed-effects models were used to handle the within-person design, containing both fixed effect factors (side, group, and subgroup), and random effects (patients), while also adjusting for the level at baseline.
    A total of 20 patients were enrolled. At follow-up 1-3 months after treatment, sweat secretion was not affected in the treated axilla when compared to the control axillae (0.01 [95%CI: -0.04 to 0.05]; p = 0.68). In the Nd:YAG subgroup (10 patients), least squares means for sweat secretion was 0.18 mg/5 min in the treated versus 0.15 mg/5 min in the control axilla, respectively, corresponding to a statistically insignificant mean difference of 0.02 mg/5 min (95% CI: -0.06 to 0.11; p = 0.54). In the IPL subgroup (10 patients), sweat secretion was 0.06 mg/5 min in the treated axilla versus 0.07 mg/5 min in the control axilla with a statistically insignificant difference of -0.01 points (95% CI: -0.03 to 0.02; p = 0.46). Likewise, none of the secondary outcomes were significantly affected by treatment. However, both treatments appeared safe and well tolerated with no adverse effects reported at follow-up.
    One treatment with external 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser or 640 nm IPL at commercially available settings, failed to demonstrate clinical benefit in treating PAH, with narrow confidence intervals implying that this was not due to a type-2 error.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    肥厚性瘢痕形成是一个复杂的过程,并且已经引入了许多方法来治疗疤痕。本研究旨在评估CO2点阵激光联合窄带强脉冲光(IPL)与单纯IPL治疗增生性瘢痕的效果。
    这是一个前景,随机对照研究纳入了138例增生性瘢痕患者。将参与者随机分为CO2-IPL组和IPL组。并每隔10-14周接受3次治疗,随访3个月.两名独立的整形外科医生使用患者和观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)评估治疗。使用患者满意度量表(PSS)评估总体满意度。
    101名受试者完成了研究。与单一IPL相比,CO2-IPL组合组在瘙痒方面显着改善,颜色,刚度,厚度,和不规则,除了疼痛,血管化的增强,色素沉着,厚度,救济,和疤痕的柔韧性,按POSAS评估(p<0.01)。联合组的100%患者感到满意,而仅IPL的患者为84%。
    CO2分数激光和窄带IPL的结合有效地改善了肥厚性疤痕的外观和轮廓,提供全面可靠的疤痕治疗方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Hypertrophic scarring is a complex process, and numerous methods have been introduced to treat scars. This study aims to evaluate the effect of combined CO2 fractional laser and narrowband intense pulsed light (IPL) compared to IPL alone in the treatment of hypertrophic scars.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a prospective, randomized controlled study enrolled 138 patients with hypertrophic scars. The participants were randomly divided into two groups: CO2-IPL and IPL group, and received three sessions at 10-14-week intervals for 3-month follow-up. Two independent plastic surgeons evaluated the treatments using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scales (POSAS). Overall satisfaction was evaluated using the Patient Satisfaction Scale (PSS).
    UNASSIGNED: 101 subjects completed the study. Compared to single IPL, the combination CO2-IPL group showed a significant improvement in itching, color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity, except for pain, and an enhancement in vascularization, pigmentation, thickness, relief, and pliability of the scar, assessed by POSAS (p < .01). 100% patients in the combination group were satisfied compared to 84% in IPL alone.
    UNASSIGNED: The combination of CO2 fractional laser and narrowband IPL efficiently improved the appearance and profile of hypertrophic scars, offering a comprehensive and reliable approach for scar therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    白癜风患者可能希望激光脱毛,嫩肤,血管治疗,和其他激光或强脉冲光(IPL)辅助治疗。然而,有诱发新的色素减退的风险(Koebner现象)。在没有关于白癜风患者安全使用激光或IPL的指南的情况下,皮肤科医生往往不愿意进行这些治疗。这项调查研究的目的是提供激光/IPL诱导的白斑病或白癜风的发生和相关危险因素的估计。对来自11个国家的15名白癜风专家进行了横断面调查研究,有14个关于受影响患者的问题,涉及激光/IPL治疗和医生的方法。在总共11300名白癜风患者中,据报道,30例患者(0.27%)出现激光/IPL诱导的白斑病或白癜风.其中,12例(40%)患者有白癜风病史,其中7例(58%)患者在治疗前患有稳定(>12个月)白癜风。最常见的报道是脱毛程序和面部和腿部的定位。副作用比如起泡,结壳,56.7%的病例发生糜烂。这些白癜风专家根据他们的建议,对白癜风的稳定性(43%)和活动迹象(50%)的激光治疗的风险,50%的人在开始激光治疗前讨论风险。相关活动迹象为柯布纳现象(57.1%),纸屑样病变(57.1%)和低变色边界(50%)。激光诱导的白斑病或白癜风是一种罕见的现象。值得注意的是,少数人有白癜风病史,其中58%稳定。因此,大多数病例无法通过不治疗白癜风患者来预防。然而,大多数患有激光/IPL诱导的皮肤损伤.因此,建议谨慎使用积极的设置,建议在治疗前使用测试点。这项研究表明,白癜风专家关于激光/IPL诱导的白癜风或白癜风的当前建议和方法存在显着差异。
    Vitiligo patients may desire laser hair removal, skin rejuvenation, vascular treatments, and other laser or intense pulsed light (IPL) assisted treatments. However, there is a risk of inducing new depigmented patches (Koebner phenomenon). In absence of guidelines on the safe use of laser or IPL in vitiligo patients, dermatologists tend to be reluctant to administer these treatments. The aim of this survey study was to provide an estimation of the occurrence and related risk factors of laser/IPL-induced leukoderma or vitiligo. A cross-sectional survey study was performed among 15 vitiligo experts from 11 countries, with 14 questions about affected patients, involved laser/IPL treatments and the physicians\' approach. In a total of 11,300 vitiligo patients, laser/IPL-induced leukoderma or vitiligo was reported in 30 patients (0.27%). Of these, 12 (40%) patients had a medical history of vitiligo and seven (58%) of these patients had stable (> 12 months) vitiligo before the treatment. Most frequently reported were hair removal procedures and localization of the face and legs. Side effects like blistering, crusting, and erosions occurred in 56.7% of the cases. These vitiligo experts based their advice on the risk of the laser treatment on stability of the vitiligo (43%) and activity signs (50%), and 50% discuss the risks before starting a laser treatment. Relevant activity signs are the Koebner phenomenon (57.1%), confetti-like lesions (57.1%) and hypochromic borders (50%). Laser-induced leukoderma or vitiligo is an uncommon phenomenon. Remarkably, a minority had a medical history of vitiligo of which 58% were stable. Consequently, most cases could not have been prevented by not treating vitiligo patients. However, a majority had laser/IPL-induced skin damage. Therefore, caution is advised with aggressive settings and test-spots prior to the treatment are recommended. This study showed significant variation in the current recommendations and approach of vitiligo experts regarding laser/IPL-induced leukoderma or vitiligo.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:联合治疗,如服用氨甲环酸,同时使用激光治疗已被许多实验证明具有潜在的疗效。然而,很少有包含大量样本和一致观察的研究。
    目的:我们评估了一种新的全身药物-激光-光子疗法的临床疗效和安全性。
    方法:对75例混合型黄褐斑患者进行回顾性随机研究。每次访问,使用VISIA拍摄标准化照片.使用两名皮肤科医生的照片标记改良的黄褐斑面积和严重度指数(mMASI)评分。
    结果:治疗后mMASI评分从6.92显著下降至3.84。VISIA分析右脸颊数据显示:斑点(从49.67±3.43到56.09±3.31),紫外线斑点(从41.39±24.45到44.56±25.86),和棕色斑点(从23.97±17.89到28.16±21.28)在统计学上增加(p=0.035,p=0.018,p=0.07)。所有患者都感觉到不同程度的改善,大约10.17%的人感觉有了很大的改善,30.51%感觉有很大改善(51%-75%),45.76%感到中度改善(26%-50%),13.56%感觉改善不大(1%-25%)。
    结论:本研究为非对照组。
    结论:已证明药物-激光-光子疗法联合全身治疗黄褐斑的有效性和安全性。它有可能成为一个新的,可靠,广泛适用的治疗策略。
    BACKGROUND: Combinational therapy such as taking tranexamic acid while using laser treatment has been proved potential efficacy by many experiments. However, there is few research which contains large samples and consistent observations.
    OBJECTIVE: We evaluated clinical efficacy and safety of a new systemic treatment of drug-laser-photon therapy.
    METHODS: Retrospective and randomized investigator-blinded study of 75 patients with mixed type melasma was analyzed. At each visit, standardized photographs were taken using VISIA. Modified melasma area and severity index (mMASI) scores were marked using photographs by two dermatologists.
    RESULTS: The mMASI score decreased significantly from 6.92 to 3.84 after the treatment. The VISIA analyze right cheek data shows: Spots (from 49.67 ± 3.43 to 56.09 ± 3.31), UV spots (from 41.39 ± 24.45 to 44.56 ± 25.86), and Brown spots (from 23.97 ± 17.89 to 28.16 ± 21.28) are statistically increased (p = 0.035, p = 0.018, p = 0.07). All patients feel varying degrees of improvement, about 10.17% felt very much improved, 30.51% felt much improved (51%-75%), 45.76% felt moderately improved (26%-50%), and 13.56% felt little improved (1%-25%).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study was no control group.
    CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety profile of the combination of drug-laser-photon therapy systemic treatment in melasma patients has been proved. It has potential possibility to become a new, reliable, widely suitable therapy strategy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:睑板腺(MGs)分泌不足可导致干眼症和症状。由MGs分泌的泪膜脂质层(TFLL)保护并防止泪膜的快速蒸发。目的是在最佳脉冲光技术(OPT)强脉冲光(IPL)后使用泪液干涉法评估蒸发性干眼(EDE)患者的TFLL改变和功能。
    方法:这项前瞻性随机对照研究包括86名DED患者(142只眼)。在第0、21和42天进行IPL或假手术。眼表疾病指数(OSDI),非侵入性破裂时间(NITBUT),干涉条纹图案确定TFLL质量,荧光素染色(FS),在第0、21、42和3个月时评估和meiburm腺(MG)。
    结果:在3个月时,TFLL,NITBUT,MG辍学,MG质量,MG表现力,IPL组FS和OSDI明显改善(P<0.05),而假手术组无显著改善。除了Meibo-score和FS,所有参数均与IPL治疗后TFLL的改善显着相关。此外,从D-42开始,IPL组的人工泪液使用量明显减少.
    结论:IPL治疗显示出改善TFLL质量的能力,并在临床上减少了DED的体征和症状,从而减少了人工泪液的使用频率。
    BACKGROUND: Inadequate meibomian glands (MGs) secretion can lead to dry eye signs and symptoms. Tear film lipid layer (TFLL) secreted by MGs protects and prevents rapid evaporation of tear film. The purpose was to assess TFLL alteration and function in patients with evaporative dry eye (EDE) using tear interferometry after optimal pulse light technology (OPT) intense pulsed light (IPL).
    METHODS: This prospective randomized examiner-masked sham- controlled study included 86 participants (142 eyes) with DED. IPL or sham procedure was performed on day 0, 21, and 42. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), non-invasive breakup time (NITBUT), interferometric fringe pattern determined TFLL quality, fluorescein staining (FS), and meibum gland (MG) were assessed at day 0, 21, 42 and 3-month.
    RESULTS: At 3-month, TFLL, NITBUT, MG drop-out, MG quality, MG expressibility, FS and OSDI improved significantly (P < 0.05) in the IPL group, while the sham group had no significant improvements. Except for Meibo-score and FS, all parameters significantly correlated with the improvement in TFLL following IPL treatment. Additionally, artificial tears usage was significantly less in the IPL group from D-42 onwards.
    CONCLUSIONS: IPL treatment demonstrated the ability to improve TFLL quality and clinically reduced sign and symptoms of DED thereby reducing the frequency of artificial tears use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    各种方法已被用于预防疤痕;然而,最佳方法尚不清楚。我们研究了组合强脉冲光(IPL)/分数掺铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光治疗在早期伤口愈合中的功效。这是一个潜在的,随机化,受控分裂伤口试验。疤痕分为三个部位:IPL/分数Er:YAG联合治疗,分数Er:YAG激光治疗,和未经处理的控制位点。在三个疗程中进行治疗:在移除缝线时以及在4和8周后。使用患者观察者疤痕评估量表(POSAS)和温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)评分评估治疗效果。测量红斑指数(EI)和黑色素指数(MI)。在POSAS总分中,IPL/分数Er:YAG位点显示出稳定和显着的改善,与其他网站相比。在第8周,联合治疗部位的POSAS评分优于单独使用Er:YAG激光的部位(p=0.001)和对照部位(p=0.000)。通过比较Er:YAG(p=0.015)和对照位点(p=0.007),维持组合治疗的效果直到随访期。就VSS分数而言,与第4周相比,IPL/分数Er:YAG组合治疗部位在第8周(p=0.005)和第20周(p=0.02)具有一致的改善,而其他部位没有显示这种改善。总之,IPL和Er:YAG的组合在预防瘢痕方面显示出比Er:YAG或不治疗更有利的效果。IPL/Er:YAG治疗可能是早期伤口愈合过程中减少瘢痕形成的有效且安全的策略。
    Various methods have been used for scar prevention; however, the optimal method remains unclear. We investigated the efficacy of combinational intense pulsed light (IPL)/fractional erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser treatment in early wound healing. This was a prospective, randomized, controlled split wound trial. Scars were divided into three sites: the combined IPL/fractional Er:YAG treatment, fractional Er:YAG laser treatment, and untreated control sites. Treatment was conducted in three sessions: at removal of stitches and after 4 and 8 weeks. Treatment efficacy was evaluated using the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scores. The erythema index (EI) and melanin index (MI) were measured. In the total POSAS score, the IPL/fractional Er:YAG site showed steady and significant improvement, in contrast to the other sites. At week 8, the combined treatment sites had better POSAS scores than the fractional Er:YAG laser alone sites (p = 0.001) and the control sites (p = 0.000). The effect of combinational treatment was maintained until the follow-up period by comparing the Er:YAG (p = 0.015) and control sites (p = 0.007). In terms of VSS scores, the IPL/fractional Er:YAG combined treatment sites had consistent improvement at week 8 (p = 0.005) and week 20 (p = 0.02) compared to that at week 4, while the other sites showed no such improvement. In conclusion, the combination of IPL and Er:YAG showed more favorable effects on scar prevention than Er:YAG or no treatment. IPL/Er:YAG therapy could be an effective and safe strategy in the early wound healing process for reducing scar formation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    几项研究发现,在触觉上有一种良好的感觉方式来研究身体表征。这里,我们解决了“主体表示的度量组件”,一种特定的功能,用于处理身体上触觉距离的辨别。文献表明,右角回(rAG)参与处理身体的触觉节拍。这项研究的问题如下:rAG是否也负责身体表征的视觉度量成分?我们在20名受试者中使用了tDCS(阳极和假),这些受试者接受了触觉和视觉刺激的身体距离辨别任务。他们还被要求在近身条件下执行相同的任务。结果使我们能够确认rAG在估计触觉距离中的作用。Further,我们还表明,rAG不仅在触觉上而且在视觉形态上都可能参与身体距离的辨别。最后,基于阳极刺激的显着影响,即使在近体视觉辨别任务中,根据数量的超模态比较器,我们提出了AG的高阶函数。
    Several studies have found in the sense of touch a good sensory modality by which to study body representation. Here, we address the \"metric component of body representation\", a specific function developed to process the discrimination of tactile distances on the body. The literature suggests the involvement of the right angular gyrus (rAG) in processing the tactile metricity on the body. The question of this study is the following: is the rAG also responsible for the visual metric component of body representation? We used tDCS (anodal and sham) in 20 subjects who were administered an on-body distance discrimination task with both tactile and visual stimuli. They were also asked to perform the same task in a near-body condition. The results allow us to confirm the role of rAG in the estimation of tactile distances. Further, we also showed that rAG might be involved in the discrimination of distances on the body not only in tactile but also in visual modality. Finally, based on the significant effects of anodal stimulation even in a near-body visual discrimination task, we proposed a higher-order function of the AG in terms of a supramodal comparator of quantities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Allocentric和自我中心是两种类型的空间编码。先前的研究报道了背侧注意网络在这两种类型中的参与。为了消除结果中可能存在的范式特定混淆,这项研究采用了细粒度的线索到目标范式来分离非中心(aSC)和自我中心(eSC)空间编码。22名参与者完成了自定义视觉空间任务,使用功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)记录氧合血红蛋白(O2-Hb)浓度的变化。使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子正则化主成分(LASSO-RPC)算法来识别预测aSC和eSC条件反应时间的皮质部位。在aSC和eSC中,右下顶叶小叶(IPL)和中央后回区域的O2-Hb浓度发生显着变化。通道间相关性的结果进一步证实了两种情况下的皮质活动主要在右顶额叶区域。与右额上回区一起是反应时间神经相关的,结果表明,自上而下的注意力和响应映射过程对于两种空间编码类型都是常见的。aSC特有的变化是在右顶内沟上的簇中,右颞顶叶交界处,离开IPL。左中央前回区域,反应时间是神经相关的,ASC可能涉及更多的定向关注,更新空间信息,和基于对象的反应选择和抑制比eSC。未来的研究将使用其他视觉空间任务设计来测试空间编码过程中发现的鲁棒性。
    Allocentric and egocentric are two types of spatial coding. Previous studies reported the dorsal attention network\'s involvement in both types. To eliminate possible paradigm-specific confounds in the results, this study employed fine-grained cue-to-target paradigm to dissociate allocentric (aSC) and egocentric (eSC) spatial coding. Twenty-two participants completed a custom visuospatial task, and changes in the concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin (O2-Hb) were recorded using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-regularized principal component (LASSO-RPC) algorithm was used to identify cortical sites that predicted the aSC and eSC conditions\' reaction times. Significant changes in O2-Hb concentration in the right inferior parietal lobule (IPL) and post-central gyrus regions were common in both aSC and eSC. Results of inter-channel correlations further substantiate cortical activities in both conditions were predominantly over the right parieto-frontal areas. Together with right superior frontal gyrus areas be the reaction time neural correlates, the results suggest top-down attention and response-mapping processes are common to both spatial coding types. Changes unique to aSC were in clusters over the right intraparietal sulcus, right temporo-parietal junction, and left IPL. With the left pre-central gyrus region, be the reaction time neural correlate, aSC is likely to involve more orienting attention, updating of spatial information, and object-based response selection and inhibition than eSC. Future studies will use other visuospatial task designs for testing the robustness of the findings on spatial coding processes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号