BACKGROUND: Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a greatly underdiagnosed and treatable genetic lipid disorder which significantly increases risk of premature cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of monogenic FH is thought to be 1 in 250-350. The NHS Long Term Plan aims to increase FH detection to at least 25% over 5 years in collaboration with primary care, supported by the NHS genomics programme.
OBJECTIVE: This systematic review evaluates systematic screening methods for FH in adults aged ≥18 years in primary care.
METHODS: Seven databases [Cochrane, PubMed, Ovid, CINAHL, ProQuest, Web of Science, Scopus], four clinical trial registries [ISRCTN, ANZCTR, Clinicaltrials.gov, WHO-ICTRP] and relevant grey literature [OpenGrey] from March 2020 to May 2023 were searched. Only studies including adults were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I.
RESULTS: 831 records were screened. No randomised, controlled studies were identified. From full-text review, five eligible non-randomised studies out of 57 (6.90%) were identified. The included studies all used automated FH case-identification from electronic medical records (EMR) and were high quality studies with a moderate risk of bias. Narrative synthesis reported outcomes which included three algorithmic studies, with a pooled detection rate, DR 14.4% (95%CI 11.67-16.62), one supervised Machine Learning [Ensemble] study, DR 15.5% (95%CI 15.47-15.53) and one study utilising a hybrid diagnostic EMR model and/or FH genotype confirmation DR 25.0% (95%CI 16.30-35.8). No adverse effects were reported in these studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating automated case-finding from EMR with clinical follow-up in primary care can enhance FH identification. Pathways incorporating genotyping showed the best detection rate.

OBJECTIVE: Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common genetic disorder characterized by lifelong elevation of severely elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk accelerates after age 20. Early diagnosis allows for treatment of children with FH and creates an opportunity to identify affected relatives through reverse cascade screening (RCS). Historically, cascade screening has had little impact on identifying individuals with FH.
RESULTS: Universal cholesterol screening (UCS) to identify youth with FH, beginning at 9-11 years-of-age, is currently recommended in the U.S. The European Atherosclerosis Society has called for UCS worldwide, emphasizing the need for educational programs to increase awareness amongst healthcare professions. Underdiagnoses and undertreatment of FH remain high. Improved rates of UCS and a systematic approach to RCS are needed. The absence of a coordinated RCS program limits the benefits of UCS. Further research is needed to identify barriers to cholesterol screening in youth.

OBJECTIVE: Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder leading to increased risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This risk can be ameliorated through adherence to pharmacological treatment and salient lifestyle behaviors (e.g., physical activity participation, healthy eating). Identifying theory-based, modifiable determinants of these behaviors may inform behavioral interventions promoting participation in FH self-management behaviors. We aimed to identify the belief-based social cognition constructs uniquely associated with intentions to perform, and actual participation in, FH self-management behaviors in the extant research.
METHODS: A systematic database search identified studies (k = 9, N = 1394) reporting relations between social cognition theory constructs and intention toward, or actual participation in, self-management behaviors in FH patients. As no studies examining prospectively-measured behaviors were identified, we tested relations among social cognition constructs, intentions, and past FH-self-management behavior using random effects multi-level meta-analysis and meta-analytic structural equation modelling.
RESULTS: We found non-zero averaged correlations among the key social cognition constructs (attitudes, norms, risk perceptions, self-efficacy), intentions, and past behavior. A meta-analytic structural equation model indicated non-zero averaged direct effects of attitudes, norms, self-efficacy, and past behavior on FH self-management behavioral intentions. There were also non-zero averaged indirect effects of past behavior on intentions mediated by the social cognition constructs.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide evidence to support the proposed model and highlight the importance of personal, normative, and capacity related beliefs and past experience as unique correlates of intentions to perform FH self-management behaviors. The model may signal potential constructs that could be targeted in behavioral interventions to promote participation in FH self-management behaviors.

OBJECTIVE: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is one of the most common inherited diseases characterized by elevated LDL-cholesterol levels, leading to early-onset atherosclerosis. While the association between FH and coronary and carotid artery disease is well-established, its association with peripheral artery disease (PAD) is less robust. This systematic review aims at exploring existing evidence on PAD prevalence and incidence in FH individuals.
METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted on MEDLINE and Embase databases, for studies published between January 2013 and December 2023, evaluating prevalence and incidence of PAD in FH patients. Literature reviews, case reports, responses to editors and non-English language articles were excluded.
RESULTS: The initial research provided 53 results. After article screening, 28 articles were fully reviewed and 24 were finally included in the analysis. Among these, 19 reported PAD prevalence, while 5 PAD incidence over a mean follow-up time of 8.7 years. PAD prevalence and incidence ranged from 0.3 to 60% and from 0.5 to 4.2% respectively, probably reflecting the heterogeneity in PAD definition criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review sheds light on the limited number of studies on PAD in FH patients. Particularly, considering the potential positive effects of newly available lipid-lowering strategies on PAD outcomes, addressing this research gap is pivotal for a more comprehensive understanding of peripheral vascular manifestations in FH patients and for optimal management of this population.

OBJECTIVE: To find out whether inclisiran sodium has different efficacy in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) patient groups.
METHODS: We conducted the systematic review and meta-analysis of ORION clinical trials. PubMed, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched for the relevant studies. Atheroscalerotic parameters considered for our objective were low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), apolipoprotein B, and nonhigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Primary outcomes were the percentage difference in atheroscalerotic parameters at follow-up relative to baseline values. Our study examined these primary outcomes to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference between the HeFH and HoFH groups. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed when at least 2 studies reported on the same variable.
RESULTS: Four ORION clinical trials provided the data related to the mean difference in the atheroscalerotic parameters at follow-up relative to baseline, of HeFH and HoFH patient populations, after administration of 300 mg inclisiran subcutaneously. We pooled together these mean differences for each group and applied a statistical test to analyze if the values were significantly different between the groups. The results of our study unveiled the significant difference in pooled mean differences in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HeFH: -48.62%; HoFH: -9.12%; P < 0.05), total cholesterol (HeFH: -30.31%; HoFH: -11.50%; P < 0.05), apolipoprotein (HeFH: -39.97%; HoFH: -14.68%; P < 0.05), and nonhigh-density lipoprotein (HeFH: -44.51%; HoFH: -12.22%; P < 0.05) between HeFH and HoFH groups. However, the difference in pooled mean difference in PCSK9 values (HeFH: -68.41%; HoFH: -56.25%; P = 0.2) between HeFH and HoFH groups was statistically insignificant. Studies were of high quality.
CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant difference in the reductions in atherosclerotic lipid parameters in heterozygous and homozygous populations after the administration of inclisiran except for PCSK9 parameter. Further studies are needed to support this conclusion.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder primarily transmitted in an autosomal-dominant manner. We distinguish two main forms of FH, which differ in the severity of the disease, namely homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). The characteristic feature of this disease is a high concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in the blood. However, the level may significantly vary between the two mentioned types of FH, and it is decidedly higher in HoFH. A chronically elevated concentration of LDL-C in the plasma leads to the occurrence of certain abnormalities, such as xanthomas in the tendons and skin, as well as corneal arcus. Nevertheless, a significantly more severe phenomenon is leading to the premature onset of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its clinical implications, such as cardiac events, stroke or vascular dementia, even at a relatively young age. Due to the danger posed by this medical condition, we have investigated how both non-pharmacological and selected pharmacological treatment impact the course of FH, thereby reducing or postponing the risk of clinical manifestations of CVD. The primary objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of the current understanding of FH, the effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapy in FH and to explain the anatomopathological correlation between FH and premature CVD development, with its complications.

BACKGROUND: OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically synthesise the cost-effectiveness of screening strategies to detect heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).
METHODS: We searched seven databases from inception to 2 February , 2023, for eligible cost-effective analysis (CEA) that evaluated screening strategies for FH versus the standard care for FH detection. Independent reviewers performed the screening, data extraction and quality evaluation. Cost results were adapted to 2022 US dollars (US$) to facilitate comparisons between studies using the same screening strategies. Cost-effectiveness thresholds were based on the original study criteria.
RESULTS: A total of 21 studies evaluating 62 strategies were included in this review, most of the studies (95%) adopted a healthcare perspective in the base case, and majority were set in high-income countries. Strategies analysed included cascade screening (23 strategies), opportunistic screening (13 strategies), systematic screening (11 strategies) and population-wide screening (15 strategies). Most of the strategies relied on genetic diagnosis for case ascertainment. The most common comparator was no screening, but some studies compared the proposed strategy versus current screening strategies or versus the best next alternative. Six studies evaluated screening in children while the remaining were targeted at adults. From a healthcare perspective, cascade screening was cost-effective in 78% of the studies [cost-adapted incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) ranged from dominant to 2022 US$ 104,877], opportunistic screening in 85% (ICERs from US$4959 to US$41,705), systematic screening in 80% (ICERs from US$2763 to US$69,969) and population-wide screening in 60% (ICERs from US$1484 to US$223,240). The most common driver of ICER identified in the sensitivity analysis was the long-term cost of lipid-lowering treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on reported willingness to pay thresholds for each setting, most CEA studies concluded that screening for FH compared with no screening was cost-effective, regardless of the screening strategy. Cascade screening resulted in the largest health benefits per person tested.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis rate of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) remained less than 10 % globally and the economic evaluation results of different FH screening strategies varied. This study aimed to systematically review the methodology and results of cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) of FH screening, which will provide evidence support for health-related decision-making.
METHODS: The Medline/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of science, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHSEED) and CEA Registry databases were electronically searched to collect full economic evaluation from the establishment of the databases to June 30, 2022. The quality of included studies was evaluated by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement 2022 (CHEERS 2022) checklist.
RESULTS: Among 232 retrieved studies, 18 economic evaluations were included and all of them are from developed countries, with an average quality score of 0.73. The decision tree model and/or Markov model were constructed by thirteen articles (72 %). Twelve studies (67 %) adopted the healthcare perspective and the lifetime horizon to compare the costs and health outcome of different screening strategies. The results of eight studies indicated that cascade screening was a cost-effective strategy compared with no screening, which was more pronounced in younger adults. Universal screening in young adults aged 16 years or 18-40 years (n=3) and in children aged 1-2 years combined with reverse cascade screening (n=3) are both cost-effective. The probability of being cost-effective for cascade screening (n=6) and universal screening (n=1) of young aged 18-40 years were greater than 95 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Our review demonstrated the economic advantages of cascade screening, universal screening of young adults, and universal screening of newborns combined with reverse cascade screening. Further health economic evaluation is needed in children and in low- and middle-income countries.

Screening for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in childhood remains controversial. Existing guidelines offer practitioners conflicting advice despite generally agreeing on the evidence and areas in which evidence is lacking, including a lack of long-term clinical trials demonstrating coronary event reduction as a result of screening and long-term data on statin side effects. A limitation of existing evidence-based frameworks is reliance on 1 evidence grading system to determine recommendations. However, rigorous evidence evaluation alternatives relevant to FH exist. FH is considered a tier 1 genetic condition, meaning that identification and treatment will improve health outcomes among those affected. Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the primary consequence of FH, can be considered causal for atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. Incorporating these concepts into existing evidence pathways allows the inclusion of surrogate clinical trial outcomes (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and atherosclerosis regression) and observational data on medication safety, strengthening the evidence for pediatric screening for FH.

BACKGROUND: We visually assessed the research hotspots of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) using bibliometrics and knowledge mapping in light of the research state and development trend of FH.
METHODS: We employed bibliometric tools, such as CiteSpace and the alluvial generator, to illustrate the scientific accomplishments on FH by extracting pertinent literature on FH from the Web of Science Core Collection database from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2022.
RESULTS: A total of 4402 papers in total were selected for study; 29.2% of all articles globally were from the USA, followed by the Netherlands and England. The University of Amsterdam, University of Oslo, and University of Western Australia are the 3 institutions with the most publications in this area. Gerald F. Watts, Raul D. Santos, and John J. P. Kastelein wrote the majority of the pieces that were published. The New England Journal of Medicine, Circulation, and Atherosclerosis were the journals with the greatest number of papers in this field. Prevalence and genetic analysis of FH, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitors, and inclisiran are current research hotspots for the condition. Future research in this area will be focused on gene therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: FH research has shown shows a trend of ascending followed by leveling off. The prevalence and diagnosis of FH, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitors, inclisiran, and gene therapy are current research hotspots. This report may serve as a reference for current research trends.