BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative inhaled budesonide combined with intravenous dexamethasone on postoperative sore throat (POST) after general anesthesia in patients who underwent thyroidectomy.
METHODS: Patients who underwent elective thyroidectomy were randomly divided into the intravenous dexamethasone group (group A) and budesonide inhalation combined with intravenous dexamethasone group (group B). All patients underwent general anesthesia. The incidence and severity of POST, hoarseness, and cough at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups.
RESULTS: There were 48 and 49 patients in groups A and B, respectively. The incidence of POST was significantly lower at 6, 12, and 24 hours in group B than that in group A (P < .05). In addition, group B had a significantly lower incidence of coughing at 24 hours (P = .047). Compared with group A, the severity of POST was significantly lower at 6 (P = .027), 12 (P = .004), and 24 (P = .005) hours at rest, and at 6 (P = .002), 12 (P = .038), and 24 (P = .015) hours during swallowing in group B. The incidence and severity of hoarseness were comparable at each time-point between the 2 groups (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative inhaled budesonide combined with intravenous dexamethasone reduced the incidence and severity of POST at 6, 12, and 24 hours after extubation compared with intravenous dexamethasone alone in patients who underwent thyroidectomy. Additionally, this combination decreased the incidence of postoperative coughing at 24 hours.

Endotracheal intubation is an airway management procedure commonly performed under general anesthesia. It is linked with postoperative voice changes. The incidence and reasons of hoarseness and vocal cord injury are not very well investigated, especially after short-term anesthesia and intubation in head and neck surgery. The aim of the study is to identify the causes of voice changes after short endotracheal anesthesia in head and neck surgery. The study will include patients scheduled for head and neck surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation up to 3 hours. There will be 3 groups of patients, as follows: thyroid surgery, non-thyroid surgery, and control group undergoing surgery outside head and neck. Videostroboscopy will be recorded before and after surgery. Further diagnostic workup will include voice status; subjective voice self-analysis; perceptive and objective acoustic voice analysis at 4 time points (preoperatively, postoperative day 2, 2 weeks and 1 month after surgery). Endotracheal intubation is a safe method of airway management although it can temporarily alter a patient\'s voice quality. It is not known how much of this is the result of anesthesia, general condition of the patient, or surgery. This trial is expected to shed some light on this issue.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to compare the effect of topical laryngeal lidocaine with intravenous lidocaine before endotracheal intubation on the incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat, hoarseness, and cough.
METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled study enrolled 144 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with endotracheal intubation. The patients were randomized to three groups and received 2% lidocaine by topical laryngeal spray (group T), intravenous 2% lidocaine (group I), and the equivalent volume of intravenous saline (group C) before intubation. The incidence and severity of sore throat, hoarseness, and cough reaction at 0.5, 1, 6, and 24 h after extubation were collected.
RESULTS: The incidence of sore throat was significantly lower in group T than in groups I and C (6.4% vs. 37.2% and 86.7%, p < 0.001), respectively at 0.5 h after extubation, and it was significantly lower in group I than that in group C (37.2% vs. 86.7%, p < 0.001). Both the incidence of hoarseness and cough were significantly lower in group T than in group I and in group C (14.9% vs. 97.7% and 97.8%, p < 0.001, and 19.1% vs. 72.0% and 93.3%, p < 0.001), respectively. The severity of sore throat, hoarseness and cough in group T was significantly lower than that in group I and that in group C (p < 0.05), and it was significantly lower in group I than in group C (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Both topical laryngeal lidocaine and intravenous lidocaine before intubation have positive effects on preventing sore throat. Topical laryngeal route was superior to intravenous route. Chictr.org.cn ID: ChiCTR2100042442.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative sore throat (POST) is an unpleasant outcome that can occur as a result of tracheal intubation in adults. Increased pressure from the endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff often leads to local mucosal injury, resulting in sore throat. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of two different ETT cuff pressure monitoring systems vs. no cuff pressure monitoring on the incidence and severity of POST in adults.
METHODS: One hundred and fourteen ASA I-III patients of either gender, aged 18-65 years, and undergoing surgery requiring endotracheal intubation were included in this study. Patients were randomized into three groups: control (C), cuff pressure gauge (G), and automated cuff controller (A). The ETT cuff pressure was not monitored intraoperatively in group C but was monitored using a cuff pressure gauge and an automated cuff controller in groups G and A, respectively. Postoperatively, patients were assessed at 2, 24, and 48 h for the presence and severity of POST, hoarseness and cough.
RESULTS: One hundred and eleven patients completed the study. POST occurred in 40.5% of the patients in group G (n = 37) (p = 0.013) and 23.7% of the patients in group A (n = 38) (p < 0.001) within 48 h after surgery, compared to 69.4% in group C (n = 36). There were no significant differences in hoarseness, coughing, and dysphagia across the groups at any time. When comparing groups A and C, individuals in group A exhibited a lower occurrence of significant (grade ≥ 2) POST and hoarseness (10.5% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.002; 26.3% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.005). The incidence of significant cough and dysphagia did not differ substantially across the patient groups within 48 h after surgery. POST scores in group A at 2, 24 h postoperatively were both 0 (0-0), which was significantly lower than those in group C (1 (0-2) at 2 h, p < 0.001 ; 1 (0-1) at 24 h, p = 0.001). POST in group G at 2 h postoperatively was graded as 0 (0-1.5) which was milder than group C (P = 0.024). The severity of hoarseness in group A with scores of 0 (0-2) was superior to that in group C (2 (0-2), p = 0.006) at 2 h postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the findings of this study indicated that the occurrence of POST can be reduced by using either the cuff pressure gauge approach or the automated cuff controller method. The automated cuff controller monitoring can potentially decrease the severity of POST and hoarseness.
BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, identifier: ChiCTR2100054089, Date: 08/12/2021.

The primary objective of the study was to find out the aetiology of hoarseness and analyse people with hoarseness based on socio-demographic profile like age, gender, occupation and socio-economic status. Secondary objective was to find out the predisposing factors of hoarseness and to see their association between benign and malignant causes of hoarseness. The study was conducted for a period of one and half years in 178 patients who were above the age of 18 years of age and presented with hoarseness lasting for more than 2 weeks to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology. After obtaining a written informed consent, history was taken using a structured proforma and a proper clinical examination was done including indirect laryngoscopy. Nasopharyngolarygoscopy was done where indirect laryngoscopy was difficult. In a sample of 178 patients with hoarseness, 159 patients had structural lesions and 19 patients had movement disorders. Of the structural lesions, 86 patients were due to malignancy, 64 due to non-neoplastic causes, and 9 were due to premalignant causes. The most common malignant cause for hoarseness was Malignancy glottis, which had a male predilection. Smoking and alcoholism were found to be the main predisposing factors. The most common non neoplastic cause were vocal cord nodule and vocal cord polyp. The main predisposing factor was vocal abuse and was seen mostly in females. Vocal cord palsy was found to be the most common movement disorder. Hoarseness as a symptom if taken lightly can lead to serious consequences. Therefore it is important to avoid predisposing factors like smoking, alcoholism and also to educate the people regarding the proper use of voice.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative sore throat (POST) and hoarseness are common complications of tracheal intubation. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of flurbiprofen administered through the subglottic port of tracheal tubes to prevent POST after cardiac surgery.
METHODS: Single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
METHODS: Tertiary Care Referral University Hospital (Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome).
METHODS: Included 71 patients undergoing for elective cardiac surgery. Inclusion criteria were (a) age between 50 and 75 years, (b) NYHA class I or II, (c) surgery for myocardial revascularization or valve repair or replacement under cardiopulmonary bypass.
METHODS: Patients were double blind randomized to receive flurbiprofen or saline in the subglottic port of the endotracheal tube (groups F and P). The solution was injected ten minutes after tracheal tube placement, ten minutes after ICU admission and ten minutes before tracheal tube removal.
METHODS: The primary outcome was to assess the effect of topical flurbiprofen administered through the subglottic port of the tracheal tube to prevent post-operative sore throat (POST). The secondary outcomes were the presence of hoarseness safety and patient\'s subjective satisfaction with their recovery. We did not report any exploratory outcomes.
RESULTS: We analyzed 68 patients, 34 patients in each group. In group F, two patients complained of POST and hoarseness (5.9%), while all controls did. The two groups significantly differed in the severity scores (VAS and TPS for sore throat and HOAR for hoarseness) at all time points. In group P, patients reported mild to moderate symptoms that significantly improved or disappeared 36 h after tracheal tube removal. According to the multivariable model, hoarseness affected women less than men, in the control group (p = 0.002). None of the patients in either group reported any adverse effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Repeated administration of flurbiprofen through the subglottic port of tracheal tubes reduced the incidence of sore throat and hoarseness after cardiac surgery without evidence of complications.

Background The I-LMA ventilates while providing a port for blind insertion of an endotracheal tube. The ILMA Fastrach is used especially for intubating in a difficult airway scenario. Its accompanying endotracheal tube is not economical nor readily available. In comparison, two alternative endotracheal tubes - polyvinyl chloride and wire-reinforced tubes were used for tracheal intubation through the ILMA.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare the ease of intubation when using conventional PVC tubes versus the wire-reinforced flexometallic tubes with the ILMA-FastrachTM. The number of attempts, time taken and additional maneuvers were noted. Intra-operative hemodynamic changes, post-operative sore throat, bleeding and hoarseness of voice was recorded over a period of 24 hours.
METHODS: After informed consent, 60 ASA I-II patients undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia were allocated to undergo blind intubation with the PVC tube or the wire-reinforced flexometallic tube.
RESULTS: More attempts were required for successful intubation using the wire-reinforced tube than the PVC tube with 76.7% passing in the first attempt in the PVC, and 53.3% passing in the first attempt in the flexometallic group. (P = 0.4). Average time for intubation in the PVC group: 28.24 ± 7.22 seconds. Average time for intubation in the flexometallic tube: 45.8 ± 15.78 sec. Occurrence of post-operative sore throat was 13.3% in the PVC group and 26.6% in the flexometallic group, with minimal hoarseness of voice 3.3% in the PVC group and 10% in the flexometallic group. There was also a slightly higher hemodynamic response in those who were intubated with the flexometallic tube than a PVC tube.
CONCLUSIONS: Intubating via the ILMA-Fastrach with the PVC tube offered better intubating conditions with regards to lesser time taken, lesser attempts, less manipulation, and less hemodynamic variations as compared to the patients who were intubated using the wire-reinforced tube.
Résumé Arrière-plan: L\'I-LMA ventile tout en fournissant un port pour l\'insertion aveugle d\'une sonde endotrachéale. L\'ILMA Fastrach est utilisé notamment pour l\'intubation dans un scénario de voies respiratoires difficiles. La sonde endotrachéale qui l\'accompagne n\'est ni économique ni facilement disponible. En comparaison, deux tubes endotrachéaux alternatifs – du chlorure de polyvinyle et des tubes renforcés de fil – ont été utilisés pour l\'intubation trachéale via l\'ILMA. Buts et objectifs: Le but de notre étude était de comparer la facilité d\'intubation lors de l\'utilisation de tubes en PVC conventionnels par rapport aux tubes flexométalliques renforcés de fil avec l\'ILMA-FastrachTM. Le nombre de tentatives, le temps nécessaire et les manÓuvres supplémentaires ont été notés. Les changements hémodynamiques peropératoires, les maux de gorge postopératoires, les saignements et l\'enrouement de la voix ont été enregistrés sur une période de 24 heures. Méthodologie: Après consentement éclairé, 60 patients ASA I-II subissant des interventions chirurgicales électives sous anesthésie générale ont été affectés à une intubation aveugle avec le tube en PVC ou le tube flexométallique renforcé de fil. Résultats: Plus de tentatives ont été nécessaires pour réussir l\'intubation à l\'aide du tube renforcé par fil métallique qu\'avec le tube PVC, avec 76,7 % de réussite lors de la première tentative dans le groupe PVC et 53,3 % de réussite lors de la première tentative dans le groupe flexométallique. (P = 0,4). Temps moyen d\'intubation dans le groupe PVC : 28,24 ± 7,22 secondes. Temps moyen d\'intubation dans le tube flexométallique : 45,8 ± 15,78 sec. La survenue de maux de gorge postopératoires était de 13,3 % dans le groupe PVC et de 26,6 % dans le groupe flexométallique, avec un enrouement minime de la voix de 3,3 % dans le groupe PVC et de 10 % dans le groupe flexométallique. Il y avait également une réponse hémodynamique légèrement plus élevée chez ceux qui étaient intubés avec le tube flexométallique qu\'avec un tube en PVC. Conclusion: L\'intubation via l\'ILMA-Fastrach avec le tube en PVC offrait de meilleures conditions d\'intubation en ce qui concerne moins de temps, moins de tentatives, moins de manipulations et moins de variations hémodynamiques par rapport aux patients intubés à l\'aide du tube renforcé de fil Mots-clés: Facilité d\'intubation, sonde endotrachéale flexométallique, masque laryngé d\'intubation des voies respiratoires, sonde endotrachéale en polychlorure de vinyle.

BACKGROUND: Tracheal injuries, vocal cord injuries, sore throat and hoarseness are common complications of double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of \'video double-lumen tubes\' (VDLTs) on intubation complications in patients undergoing thoracic surgery.
METHODS: A randomised controlled study.
METHODS: Xuzhou Cancer Hospital, Xuzhou, China, from January 2023 to June 2023.
METHODS: One hundred eighty-two patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery with one-lung ventilation were randomised into two groups: 90 in the DLT group and 92 in the VDLT group.
METHODS: VDLT was selected for intubation in the VDLT group, and DLT was selected for intubation in the DLT group. A fibreoptic bronchoscope (FOB) was used to record tracheal and vocal cord injuries.
METHODS: The primary outcomes were the incidence of moderate-to-severe tracheal injury and the incidence of vocal cord injury. The secondary outcomes included the incidence and severity of postoperative 24 and 48 h sore throat and hoarseness.
RESULTS: The incidence of moderate-to-severe tracheal injury was 32/90 (35.6%) in the DLT group, and 45/92 (48.9%) in the VDLT group ( P  = 0.077; relative risk 1.38, 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.95). The incidence of vocal cord injury was 31/90 (34.4%) and 34/92 (37%) in the DLT and VDLT groups, respectively ( P  = 0.449). The incidence of postoperative 24 h sore throat and hoarseness was significantly higher in the VDLT group than in the DLT group (for sore throat: P  = 0.032, relative risk 1.63, 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.57; for hoarseness: P  = 0.018, relative risk 1.48, 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.06).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of moderate-to-severe tracheal injury and vocal cord injury between DLTs and VDLTs. While improving the first-attempt success rate, intubation with VDLT increased the incidence of postoperative 24 h sore throat and hoarseness.
BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR2300067348.

OBJECTIVE: Left vertebral artery revascularization is indicated in surgery involving zone 2 of the aortic arch and is typically accomplished indirectly via subclavian artery revascularization. For aberrant left vertebral anatomy, direct revascularization is indicated. Our objective was to compare the outcomes of direct vertebral artery revascularization with indirect subclavian artery revascularization for treating aortic arch pathology and to identify predictors of mortality.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital, including patients who underwent open or endovascular vertebral artery revascularization from 2005 to 2022. Those who underwent direct vertebral revascularization were compared with those who were indirectly revascularized via subclavian artery revascularization. The outcomes of interest were a composite outcome (any of death, stroke, nerve injury, and thrombosis) and mortality. Univariate logistic regression models were fitted to quantify the strength of differences between the direct and indirect revascularization cohorts. Cox regression was used to identify mortality predictors.
RESULTS: Of 143 patients who underwent vertebral artery revascularization, 21 (14.7%) had a vertebral artery originating from the aortic arch. The median length of stay was 10 days (interquartile range, 6-20 days), and demographics were similar between cohorts. The incidence of composite outcome, bypass thrombosis, and hoarseness was significantly higher in the direct group (42.9% vs 18.0%, P = .019; 33.3% vs 0.8%, P < .0001; 57.1% vs 18.0%, P < .001, respectively). The direct group was approximately three times more likely to experience the composite outcome (odds ratio, 3.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.28, 9.08); similarly, this group was approximately six times more likely to have hoarseness (odds ratio, 5.88; 95% confidence interval, 2.21, 15.62). There was no significant difference in mortality rates at 30 days, 1, 3, 5, and 10 years of follow-up. Age, length of hospital stay, and congestive heart failure were identified as predictors of higher mortality. After adjusting for these covariates, the group itself was not an independent predictor of mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Direct vertebral revascularization was associated with higher rates of composite outcome (death, stroke, nerve injury, and thrombosis), bypass thrombosis and hoarseness. Patients with aberrant vertebral anatomy are at higher risks of these complications compared with patients with standard arch anatomy. However, after adjusting for other factors, mortality rates were not significantly different between the groups.

Hyperangulated videolaryngoscopes are known to increase the success rate of tracheal intubation in the setting of difficult airway management when used with a stylet or bougie. However, there is controversy over which adjunct is more useful. This randomised study aimed to compare first attempt tracheal intubation success rate between a stylet and bougie when using a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope. We recruited patients aged > 20 years who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia and required tracheal intubation. We only included patients with factors predicting difficult tracheal intubation based on pre-anaesthesia airway evaluation. Tracheal intubation was attempted using a Glidescope® with either a stylet or bougie as an adjunct according to group assignment. Primary outcome was the success rate of the first tracheal intubation attempt, and secondary outcomes were success of second and third attempts; tracheal intubation time; and occurrence of sore throat, dysphagia or hoarseness. A total of 166 patients were included. The success rate of the first tracheal intubation attempt was significantly higher in patients allocated to the bougie group compared with those allocated to the stylet group (81/83 (98%) vs. 73/83 (88%), respectively; p = 0.032). The number of patients who needed two attempts was significantly lower in those allocated to the bougie group compared with those allocated to the stylet group (1/83 (1%) vs. 9/83 (11%), respectively; p = 0.018). Each group had one patient (1%) where tracheal intubation was achieved after a third attempt. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of sore throat, dysphagia and hoarseness between the two groups. When difficult tracheal intubation is anticipated and a hyperangulated videolaryngoscope is used, the success rate of the first attempt is higher when a bougie is used compared with a stylet.