Hoarseness

声音嘶哑
  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Infants with laryngotracheal anomalies are clinically manifested as stridor or noisy breathing, choking, hoarseness, feeding difficulties, and cyanotic spells, followed by developmental and growth retardation and other health issues; in severe cases, patients may present with severe dyspnea, which is associated with high mortality. A timely diagnosis as well as appropriate strategy for laryngotracheal anomalies is still challenging for pediatric otolaryngologists. This consensus statement, evolved from expert opinion by the members of the Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology Professional Committee of the Pediatrician Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association, provides comprehensive recommendations and standardized guidance for otolaryngologists who manage infants and young children with laryngotracheal anomalies in evaluation and treatment based on symptomatology, physical and laboratory examinations.
    摘要: 婴幼儿喉气道结构异常的患者在临床上表现为喘鸣、呛咳、声音嘶哑、喂养困难、间歇性青紫,以及部分患儿呼吸道梗阻导致重度的呼吸困难,甚至死亡,随之出现生长发育缓慢等健康问题,如何早期诊断与评估是儿童耳鼻喉科医生在临床上面对的极为棘手的问题。中国医师协会儿科医师分会儿童耳鼻咽喉专业委员会联合全国多家国家或区域儿童医疗中心讨论拟定评估共识,从症状学、客观检查等方面制定出了儿童气道结构异常的评估诊断方案,为临床规范化诊疗提供指导性意见。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    根据美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会的临床实践指南,确定加拿大语音中心是否符合建议的喉镜检查时间。
    回顾性图表审计。
    三级转诊加拿大语音中心。
    共149名6个月以上出现声音嘶哑的成年患者。主要结局指标是从症状发作到喉镜检查的时间和从转诊到喉镜检查的时间。次要结局指标包括患者和疾病改变因素,诊断,和临床管理。进行分析以确定哪些因素与满足指南相关。
    患者在21.9±37.6个月(平均值±SD)症状后由喉科医师进行评估。三分之一(34.2%)的患者在3个月内就诊;10.7%在4周内就诊。Logistic回归显示,有神经系统症状的患者(比值比,4.04;95%CI,1.31-12.43;P=.015)和气管插管(比值比,5.94;95%CI,2.21-15.95;P<.001)与3个月内出现相关。最近插管的患者(赔率比,6.04;95%CI,1.99-18.34;P=.002)与4周内的观察相关。
    对于我们的加拿大语音中心来说,满足美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会关于喉镜检查时间建议的临床实践指南是一项持续的挑战。病理更严重的患者始终被更紧急地分类。这项为期4周的建议是否可推广到社会化的医疗保健系统,尚有争议。
    UNASSIGNED: To determine if a Canadian voice center is meeting the recommended time to laryngoscopy for hoarseness per the clinical practice guideline of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective chart audit.
    UNASSIGNED: Tertiary referral Canadian voice center.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 149 adult patients presenting with hoarseness over 6 months were included. Primary outcome measures were the time from onset of symptoms to laryngoscopy and the time from referral to laryngoscopy. Secondary outcome measures included patient- and disease-modifying factors, diagnosis, and clinical management. Analysis was performed to determine what factors were associated with meeting the guideline.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients were evaluated by the laryngologist after 21.9 ± 37.6 months (mean ± SD) of symptoms. One-third (34.2%) of patients were seen within 3 months; 10.7% were seen within 4 weeks. Logistic regression showed that patients with neurologic symptoms (odds ratio, 4.04; 95% CI, 1.31-12.43; P = .015) and endotracheal intubation (odds ratio, 5.94; 95% CI, 2.21-15.95; P < .001) were associated with being seen within 3 months. Patients who had recent intubation (odds ratio, 6.04; 95% CI, 1.99-18.34; P = .002) were associated with being seen within 4 weeks.
    UNASSIGNED: It is an ongoing challenge for our Canadian voice center to meet the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery\'s clinical practice guideline for recommended time to laryngoscopy. Patients with more severe pathologies were consistently triaged more urgently. It is debatable whether this 4-week time recommendation is generalizable to a socialized health care system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The Hoarseness Guideline Update provides an evidence-based approach to a patient who presents to the clinic with hoarseness. The guidelines cover management decisions in acute and chronic dysphonia for patients of all ages before and after laryngeal examination. The present review discusses the process used to develop these guidelines, including limitations of the process and each key action statement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Evaluation Study
    目标:在苏格兰,根据苏格兰可疑癌症转诊指南,疑似头颈部癌症患者应被转诊,而不是国家健康与护理卓越研究所的指导方针。全科医生应在转诊持续声音嘶哑的同时要求进行胸部X光检查。这方面的证据是4级。
    方法:本次审核确定了对该建议的遵守情况和X射线检查结果。对2015-2016年向国家卫生服务局大格拉斯哥和克莱德的耳鼻喉科的所有“紧急怀疑癌症”转诊进行了审计。
    结果:318例(15.7%)患者的持续声音嘶哑超过3周。对120例(38%)患者进行了胸部X线检查,显示:116例(96.7%)无异常,2例(1.7%)和2例(1.7%)的其他感染特征。没有胸部X射线改变患者的管理。
    结论:胸部X线检查不会改变治疗,建议将其从苏格兰疑似癌症转诊指南中删除。
    OBJECTIVE: In Scotland, patients with suspected head and neck cancer are referred on the basis of the Scottish Referral Guidelines for Suspected Cancer, rather than the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. A chest X-ray should be requested by the general practitioner at the same time as referral for persistent hoarseness. The evidence for this is level 4.
    METHODS: This audit identified adherence to this recommendation and X-ray results. All \'urgent suspicion of cancer\' referrals to the ENT department in the National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde for 2015-2016 were audited.
    RESULTS: Persistent hoarseness for more than 3 weeks instigated referral in 318 patients (15.7 per cent). Chest X-ray was performed in 120 patients (38 per cent), which showed: no abnormality in 116 (96.7 per cent), features of infection in 2 (1.7 per cent) and something else in 2 patients (1.7 per cent). No chest X-ray altered the management of a patient.
    CONCLUSIONS: Performance of chest X-ray does not alter management and its removal from the Scottish Referral Guidelines for Suspected Cancer is recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的本指南提供了关于治疗存在发音障碍的患者的循证建议。其特征是声音质量改变,螺距,响度,或影响沟通和/或生活质量的声音努力。在其生命的某个阶段,发声障碍会影响近三分之一的人口。本指南适用于在将识别或管理发音障碍的环境中评估的所有年龄组。它适用于所有可能诊断和治疗发声障碍患者的临床医生。目的本指南的主要目的是提高发声障碍患者的护理质量。基于目前最好的证据。填补证据空白的专家共识,使用时,明确说明,并有详细的透明度证据概况支持。该指南的具体目标是减少护理方面的不适当变化,产生最佳的健康结果,尽量减少伤害。对于此指南更新,美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科基金会选择了一个代表高级实践护理领域的小组,支气管食管学,消费者宣传,家庭医学,老年医学,内科,喉科,神经学,耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,儿科,专业的声音,肺科,和语言病理学。行动声明指南更新小组对以下关键行动声明(KAS)提出了强有力的建议:(1)临床医生应通过病史和体格检查来评估发声障碍患者,以确定需要加快喉部评估的因素。这些包括,但不限于,最近涉及头部的外科手术,脖子,或胸部;最近气管插管;同时存在颈部肿块;呼吸窘迫或喘鸣;烟草滥用史;以及患者是否是专业的语音使用者。(2)临床医生应提倡对语音障碍患者进行语音治疗。指南更新小组对以下KAS提出了建议:(1)临床医生应识别语音质量改变的患者的发音障碍,螺距,响度,或影响沟通或降低生活质量(QOL)的声音努力。(2)临床医生应通过病史和体格检查评估发声障碍患者的潜在原因和改变治疗的因素。(3)临床医生应进行喉镜检查,或者是指可以进行喉镜检查的临床医生,如果怀疑有严重的潜在原因,则发音障碍在4周内未能解决或改善,或者与持续时间无关。(4)临床医生应进行诊断性喉镜检查,或指可以进行诊断性喉镜检查的临床医生,在开具语音治疗并将结果记录/传达给语言病理学家(SLP)之前。(5)临床医生应提倡手术作为适合手术干预的发声障碍患者的治疗选择,比如疑似恶性肿瘤,对保守治疗没有反应的有症状的良性声带病变,或声门功能不全。(6)临床医生应该提供,或者是指可以提供的临床医生,肉毒杆菌毒素注射用于治疗由痉挛性发声障碍和其他类型的喉肌张力障碍引起的发声障碍。(7)临床医生应告知发声障碍患者控制/预防措施。(8)临床医生应记录决议,改善或恶化的症状,治疗或观察后发声障碍患者的生活质量变化。指南更新小组对1项行动提出了强烈建议:(1)临床医生不应常规开抗生素治疗发音障碍。指南更新小组针对其他措施提出了建议:(1)在可视化喉部之前,临床医生不应对患有主要语音投诉的患者进行计算机断层扫描(CT)或磁共振成像(MRI)。(2)临床医生不应该开抗反流药物来治疗孤立性发音障碍,仅根据疑似胃食管反流病(GERD)或咽喉反流(LPR)的症状,没有可视化的喉。(3)在观察喉部之前,临床医生不应对发声困难的患者常规开皮质类固醇。关于喉镜检查的以下建议的政策级别是一种选择:(1)临床医生可以在任何时候对发声障碍患者进行诊断性喉镜检查。免责声明本临床实践指南不旨在作为治疗发音障碍(声音嘶哑)的详尽指导来源。相反,它旨在通过提供基于证据的决策策略框架来帮助临床医生.该指南并不旨在取代临床判断或为所有患有这种疾病的人建立治疗方案,并且它可能无法提供诊断和管理此问题的唯一适当方法。与先前指南的差异(1)纳入新的证据档案,以包括患者偏好的作用,对证据的信心,意见分歧,质量改进机会,以及行动声明不适用的任何排除(2)纳入3项新准则,16个新的系统审查,和4项新的随机对照试验(3)将消费者倡导者纳入指南更新组(4)从原来的指南改为9个KASs(5)新的KAS3(护理升级)和KAS13(结局)(6)为发声障碍患者添加概述KASs的算法.
    Objective This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on treating patients who present with dysphonia, which is characterized by altered vocal quality, pitch, loudness, or vocal effort that impairs communication and/or quality of life. Dysphonia affects nearly one-third of the population at some point in its life. This guideline applies to all age groups evaluated in a setting where dysphonia would be identified or managed. It is intended for all clinicians who are likely to diagnose and treat patients with dysphonia. Purpose The primary purpose of this guideline is to improve the quality of care for patients with dysphonia, based on current best evidence. Expert consensus to fill evidence gaps, when used, is explicitly stated and supported with a detailed evidence profile for transparency. Specific objectives of the guideline are to reduce inappropriate variations in care, produce optimal health outcomes, and minimize harm. For this guideline update, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation selected a panel representing the fields of advanced practice nursing, bronchoesophagology, consumer advocacy, family medicine, geriatric medicine, internal medicine, laryngology, neurology, otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, pediatrics, professional voice, pulmonology, and speech-language pathology. Action Statements The guideline update group made strong recommendations for the following key action statements (KASs): (1) Clinicians should assess the patient with dysphonia by history and physical examination to identify factors where expedited laryngeal evaluation is indicated. These include, but are not limited to, recent surgical procedures involving the head, neck, or chest; recent endotracheal intubation; presence of concomitant neck mass; respiratory distress or stridor; history of tobacco abuse; and whether the patient is a professional voice user. (2) Clinicians should advocate voice therapy for patients with dysphonia from a cause amenable to voice therapy. The guideline update group made recommendations for the following KASs: (1) Clinicians should identify dysphonia in a patient with altered voice quality, pitch, loudness, or vocal effort that impairs communication or reduces quality of life (QOL). (2) Clinicians should assess the patient with dysphonia by history and physical examination for underlying causes of dysphonia and factors that modify management. (3) Clinicians should perform laryngoscopy, or refer to a clinician who can perform laryngoscopy, when dysphonia fails to resolve or improve within 4 weeks or irrespective of duration if a serious underlying cause is suspected. (4) Clinicians should perform diagnostic laryngoscopy, or refer to a clinician who can perform diagnostic laryngoscopy, before prescribing voice therapy and document/communicate the results to the speech-language pathologist (SLP). (5) Clinicians should advocate for surgery as a therapeutic option for patients with dysphonia with conditions amenable to surgical intervention, such as suspected malignancy, symptomatic benign vocal fold lesions that do not respond to conservative management, or glottic insufficiency. (6) Clinicians should offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of dysphonia caused by spasmodic dysphonia and other types of laryngeal dystonia. (7) Clinicians should inform patients with dysphonia about control/preventive measures. (8) Clinicians should document resolution, improvement or worsened symptoms of dysphonia, or change in QOL of patients with dysphonia after treatment or observation. The guideline update group made a strong recommendation against 1 action: (1) Clinicians should not routinely prescribe antibiotics to treat dysphonia. The guideline update group made recommendations against other actions: (1) Clinicians should not obtain computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with a primary voice complaint prior to visualization of the larynx. (2) Clinicians should not prescribe antireflux medications to treat isolated dysphonia, based on symptoms alone attributed to suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), without visualization of the larynx. (3) Clinicians should not routinely prescribe corticosteroids for patients with dysphonia prior to visualization of the larynx. The policy level for the following recommendation about laryngoscopy at any time was an option: (1) Clinicians may perform diagnostic laryngoscopy at any time in a patient with dysphonia. Disclaimer This clinical practice guideline is not intended as an exhaustive source of guidance for managing dysphonia (hoarseness). Rather, it is designed to assist clinicians by providing an evidence-based framework for decision-making strategies. The guideline is not intended to replace clinical judgment or establish a protocol for all individuals with this condition, and it may not provide the only appropriate approach to diagnosing and managing this problem. Differences from Prior Guideline (1) Incorporation of new evidence profiles to include the role of patient preferences, confidence in the evidence, differences of opinion, quality improvement opportunities, and any exclusion to which the action statement does not apply (2) Inclusion of 3 new guidelines, 16 new systematic reviews, and 4 new randomized controlled trials (3) Inclusion of a consumer advocate on the guideline update group (4) Changes to 9 KASs from the original guideline (5) New KAS 3 (escalation of care) and KAS 13 (outcomes) (6) Addition of an algorithm outlining KASs for patients with dysphonia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Objective This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on treating patients presenting with dysphonia, which is characterized by altered vocal quality, pitch, loudness, or vocal effort that impairs communication and/or quality of life. Dysphonia affects nearly one-third of the population at some point in its life. This guideline applies to all age groups evaluated in a setting where dysphonia would be identified or managed. It is intended for all clinicians who are likely to diagnose and treat patients with dysphonia. Purpose The primary purpose of this guideline is to improve the quality of care for patients with dysphonia, based on current best evidence. Expert consensus to fill evidence gaps, when used, is explicitly stated and supported with a detailed evidence profile for transparency. Specific objectives of the guideline are to reduce inappropriate variations in care, produce optimal health outcomes, and minimize harm. For this guideline update, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation selected a panel representing the fields of advanced practice nursing, bronchoesophagology, consumer advocacy, family medicine, geriatric medicine, internal medicine, laryngology, neurology, otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, pediatrics, professional voice, pulmonology, and speech-language pathology. Action Statements The guideline update group made strong recommendations for the following key action statements (KASs): (1) Clinicians should assess the patient with dysphonia by history and physical examination to identify factors where expedited laryngeal evaluation is indicated. These include but are not limited to recent surgical procedures involving the head, neck, or chest; recent endotracheal intubation; presence of concomitant neck mass; respiratory distress or stridor; history of tobacco abuse; and whether the patient is a professional voice user. (2) Clinicians should advocate voice therapy for patients with dysphonia from a cause amenable to voice therapy. The guideline update group made recommendations for the following KASs: (1) Clinicians should identify dysphonia in a patient with altered voice quality, pitch, loudness, or vocal effort that impairs communication or reduces quality of life (QOL). (2) Clinicians should assess the patient with dysphonia by history and physical examination for underlying causes of dysphonia and factors that modify management. (3) Clinicians should perform laryngoscopy, or refer to a clinician who can perform laryngoscopy, when dysphonia fails to resolve or improve within 4 weeks or irrespective of duration if a serious underlying cause is suspected. (4) Clinicians should perform diagnostic laryngoscopy, or refer to a clinician who can perform diagnostic laryngoscopy, before prescribing voice therapy and document/communicate the results to the speech-language pathologist (SLP). (5) Clinicians should advocate for surgery as a therapeutic option for patients with dysphonia with conditions amenable to surgical intervention, such as suspected malignancy, symptomatic benign vocal fold lesions that do not respond to conservative management, or glottic insufficiency. (6) Clinicians should offer, or refer to a clinician who can offer, botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of dysphonia caused by spasmodic dysphonia and other types of laryngeal dystonia. (7) Clinicians should inform patients with dysphonia about control/preventive measures. (8) Clinicians should document resolution, improvement or worsened symptoms of dysphonia, or change in QOL of patients with dysphonia after treatment or observation. The guideline update group made a strong recommendation against 1 action: (1) Clinicians should not routinely prescribe antibiotics to treat dysphonia. The guideline update group made recommendations against other actions: (1) Clinicians should not obtain computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with a primary voice complaint prior to visualization of the larynx. (2) Clinicians should not prescribe antireflux medications to treat isolated dysphonia, based on symptoms alone attributed to suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), without visualization of the larynx. (3) Clinicians should not routinely prescribe corticosteroids in patients with dysphonia prior to visualization of the larynx. The policy level for the following recommendation about laryngoscopy at any time was an option: (1) Clinicians may perform diagnostic laryngoscopy at any time in a patient with dysphonia. Differences from Prior Guideline (1) Incorporating new evidence profiles to include the role of patient preferences, confidence in the evidence, differences of opinion, quality improvement opportunities, and any exclusion to which the action statement does not apply (2) Inclusion of 3 new guidelines, 16 new systematic reviews, and 4 new randomized controlled trials (3) Inclusion of a consumer advocate on the guideline update group (4) Changes to 9 KASs from the original guideline (5) New KAS 3 (escalation of care) and KAS 13 (outcomes) (6) Addition of an algorithm outlining KASs for patients with dysphonia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    核心针活检(CNB)已被建议作为甲状腺结节患者细针穿刺的补充诊断方法。最近的许多CNB研究表明CNB具有更高级的作用,但是仍然没有关于它的使用指南。因此,韩国甲状腺放射学学会特别工作组委员会就CNB在甲状腺结节诊断中的作用制定了本共识声明和建议.这些建议是基于现有文献和专家共识的证据。
    Core needle biopsy (CNB) has been suggested as a complementary diagnostic method to fine-needle aspiration in patients with thyroid nodules. Many recent CNB studies have suggested a more advanced role for CNB, but there are still no guidelines on its use. Therefore, the Task Force Committee of the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology has developed the present consensus statement and recommendations for the role of CNB in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. These recommendations are based on evidence from the current literature and expert consensus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    To describe the demographics, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of laryngeal cryptococcosis. Antifungal therapy guidelines are provided and the use of laser ablation is discussed.
    PubMed, OVID MEDLINE, and Embase databases and one patient who presented to our institution\'s otolaryngology department.
    A review of the English-language international medical literature was conducted using the terms (\"larynx\" or \"laryngeal diseases\") and (\"Cryptococcus\" or \"cryptococcosis\") to identify reported cases of laryngeal cryptococcosis. Databases were searched from inception through January 2015.
    Eighteen cases were identified and reviewed, including the first reported case of potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser ablation. All patients presented with hoarseness, and two (11%) presented with acute airway obstruction that required tracheotomy. Six patients (33%) were immunocompromised, including three (17%) who had an underlying human immunodeficiency virus infection. Seven cases (39%) described an exophytic mass. Histopathology indicated pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia in seven of the 17 reported results (41%). Methenamine silver stain was used in 12 of the 15 described cases (80%) to identify the fungus. Lumbar puncture results were reported for seven patients, none of whom had meningitis. Antifungal therapy was used in 15 cases (83%), and two (11%) received additional laser ablation treatment. Eleven patients (61%) had complete resolution.
    Laryngeal cryptococcosis is a rare cause of persistent hoarseness. Most patients have complete resolution after treatment. For complex and obstructive cases, laser ablation coupled with antifungal therapy can successfully manage laryngeal cryptococcosis in select patients.
    NA Laryngoscope, 126:1625-1629, 2016.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本指南的目的是帮助FPs和其他初级保健提供者认识到应该引起他们对患者肺癌存在的怀疑的特征。
    委员会成员是从安大略省癌症护理和癌症网络的区域初级保健牵头人以及安大略省癌症护理肺癌疾病站点小组的成员中选出的。
    方法:本指南是通过对证据基础的系统评价而制定的,综合证据,以及加拿大利益攸关方参与的正式外部审查,以验证建议的相关性。
    方法:制定了循证指南,以改善加拿大背景下具有肺癌临床特征的患者的管理。
    结论:肺癌患者的早期识别和转诊可能最终有助于提高肺癌的发病率和死亡率。这些指南对于指导肺癌诊断计划的发展以及帮助政策制定者确保适当的资源到位也可能具有价值。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this guideline is to assist FPs and other primary care providers with recognizing features that should raise their suspicions about the presence of lung cancer in their patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Committee members were selected from among the regional primary care leads from the Cancer Care Ontario Provincial Primary Care and Cancer Network and from among the members of the Cancer Care Ontario Lung Cancer Disease Site Group.
    METHODS: This guideline was developed through systematic review of the evidence base, synthesis of the evidence, and formal external review involving Canadian stakeholders to validate the relevance of recommendations.
    METHODS: Evidence-based guidelines were developed to improve the management of patients presenting with clinical features of lung cancer within the Canadian context.
    CONCLUSIONS: Earlier identification and referral of patients with lung cancer might ultimately help improve lung cancer morbidity and mortality. These guidelines might also be of value for informing the development of lung cancer diagnostic programs and for helping policy makers to ensure appropriate resources are in place.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
    METHODS: Eighty dysphonic patients and 120 asymptomatic subjects were enrolled. The voice signal of each participant was recorded, listened to and rated by 3 licensed speech-language pathologists using the GRBAS scale and the Italian version of the CAPE-V. The intra- and interrater reliability of the CAPE-V was assessed as well as the degree of association between the CAPE-V and GRBAS judgments. The CAPE-V values were also compared between the patients with dysphonia and the asymptomatic subjects.
    RESULTS: The intra- and interrater reliability appeared to be good for all the parameters except for the strain parameter. The attributes \'consistent\' and \'intermittent\' demonstrated optimal intra- and interrater reliability. The difference between pathological and control groups was significant for six perceptual parameters. The highest average correlation between GRBAS and CAPE-V judgments was found between overall severity and grade while the lowest was found between the two strain scales. CAPE-V profiles differed significantly between different pathological groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Italian version of CAPE-V appears to be a reliable and valid tool for the perceptual analysis of the voice signal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号