目的:系统回顾文献,以评估有助于阴道外科手术的技术的临床和手术结果。
方法:我们系统地搜索了MEDLINE,EMBASE,和ClinicalTrials.gov从1990年1月到2022年5月。
方法:比较和单臂研究,包括关于当代工具或技术的数据,以促进良性适应症的阴道妇科外科手术的术中执行。引文进行了独立的双重筛选,合格的全文由两名审稿人摘录。收集的数据包括研究特征,技术,患者人口统计学,术中和术后结果。使用既定方法评估比较研究的偏倚风险,和限制性最大似然模型荟萃分析如所示.
结果:搜索产生了8,658份摘要,有116项合格的研究评估了椎弓根密封装置(n=32),非机器人和机器人阴道自然腔道内镜手术(n=64),缝线捕获装置(n=17),循环连字(n=2),和台式伸缩摄像机(n=1)。根据19项比较研究,椎弓根密封装置使阴式子宫切除术的手术时间缩短了15.9分钟(95%CI,-23.3至-85),失血36.9毫升(95%CI,-56.9至-17.0),住院0.2天(95%CI,-0.4至-0.1),和视觉模拟量表在主观10分上的疼痛评分为1.4分(95%CI,-1.7至-1.1)。3项非随机对照研究和53项单臂研究支持非机器人阴道自然腔道内镜手术用于子宫切除术的可行性,附件手术,骨盆重建术,和子宫肌瘤切除术.机器人阴道自然腔道内镜手术的数据有限,缝线捕获装置,循环连字,和台式摄像机,由于研究很少或研究异质性。
结论:椎弓根密封装置可减少阴式子宫切除术的手术时间和失血量,住院时间和疼痛评分略有减少。尽管文献中确定的其他技术可能有可能促进阴道外科手术并改善结果,需要额外的比较有效性研究。
背景:PROSPERO,CRD42022327490。
OBJECTIVE: To systematically
review the literature to evaluate clinical and surgical outcomes for technologies that facilitate vaginal surgical procedures.
METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1990 to May 2022.
METHODS: Comparative and single-arm studies with data on contemporary tools or technologies facilitating intraoperative performance of vaginal gynecologic surgical procedures for benign indications were included. Citations were independently double screened, and eligible full-text articles were extracted by two reviewers. Data collected included study characteristics, technology, patient demographics, and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. Risk of bias for comparative studies was assessed using established methods, and restricted maximum likelihood model meta-analyses were conducted as indicated.
RESULTS: The search yielded 8,658 abstracts, with 116 eligible studies that evaluated pedicle sealing devices (n=32), nonrobotic and robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (n=64), suture capture devices (n=17), loop ligatures (n=2), and table-mounted telescopic cameras (n=1). Based on 19 comparative studies, pedicle sealing devices lowered vaginal hysterectomy operative time by 15.9 minutes (95% CI, -23.3 to -85), blood loss by 36.9 mL (95% CI, -56.9 to -17.0), hospital stay by 0.2 days (95% CI, -0.4 to -0.1), and visual analog scale pain scores by 1.4 points on a subjective 10-point scale (95% CI, -1.7 to -1.1). Three nonrandomized comparative studies and 53 single-arm studies supported the feasibility of nonrobotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for hysterectomy, adnexal surgery, pelvic reconstruction, and myomectomy. Data were limited for robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, suture capture devices, loop ligatures, and table-mounted cameras due to few studies or study heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS: Pedicle sealing devices lower operative time and blood loss for vaginal hysterectomy, with modest reductions in hospital stay and pain scores. Although other technologies identified in the literature may have potential to facilitate vaginal surgical procedures and improve outcomes, additional comparative effectiveness research is needed.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO, CRD42022327490.