%0 Systematic Review
%T Comparison between fascia lata and rectus fascia in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review.
%A Matak L
%A Baekelandt J
%A Šimičević M
%A Matak M
%A Mikuš M
%A Orešković S
%J Arch Gynecol Obstet
%V 309
%N 6
%D 2024 Jun 4
%M 38703280
%F 2.493
%R 10.1007/s00404-024-07531-0
%X <B>OBJECTIVE: </B>The purpose of this systematic review is to present and compare results from studies that have been using autologous tissue for POP repair.<BR><B>METHODS: </B>Systematic review was done according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. We aimed to retrieve reports of published and ongoing studies on the efficacy and safety of autologous tissue in vaginal vault prolapse repair. The databases searched were MEDLINE (PubMed interface), Scopus, Cohrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials.gov.<BR><B>RESULTS: </B>The success rate varied among studies. In fascia-lata group success rate reports varied from 83 to a 100%, with a median follow-up from 12 to 52 months among studies. Rectus fascia reported success rates from 87 to a 100% with a follow-up of 12 months to longest of 98 months.<BR><B>CONCLUSIONS: </B>Autologous tissues show satisfying outcomes in terms of safety and efficacy. Sacrocolpopexy procedure with fascia lata has better outcome in term of treatment of prolapse. Harvesting place on lateral side of buttock has more complications in comparison with rectus fascia but size of the graft can be wider in fascia-lata group.