Gynecologic Surgical Procedures

妇科外科手术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    康复是一组干预措施,旨在在计划的压力事件(妇科手术)之前提高患者的耐力和功能能力。目前,康复治疗基于三种主要方式:物理治疗,营养支持和心理支持,其他人逐渐被添加。在迄今为止发表的研究中,联合术前干预对患者术后恢复的积极作用降低了围手术期和术后并发症的风险,缩短住院时间。这直接降低了与癌症治疗相关的成本。
    Prehabilitation is a set of interventions aimed at increasing the patient\'s endurance and functional capacity before a planned stressful event (oncogynaecological surgery). Currently, prehabilitation is based on three main modalities which are: physiotherapy, nutritional support and psychological support, with others gradually being added. In studies published to date, a positive effect of combined preoperative intervention on the patient\'s postoperative recovery reduces the risk of perioperative and postoperative complications, shortening the hospital stay. This directly reduces the costs associated with cancer treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:调查妇科肿瘤学家出于专业和学术目的使用社交媒体的患病率和模式。
    方法:2022年11月至12月的前瞻性在线调查针对妇科肿瘤医生(妇科肿瘤学家,外科肿瘤学家,医学肿瘤学家,放射/临床肿瘤学家,和onco-病理学家/病理学家)。调查,通过各种社交媒体平台分发,包括40个问题,以获取有关社交媒体使用的定性和定量数据。
    结果:在来自32个国家的131名受访者中,106名(80.9%)是妇科肿瘤学家,并隶属于学术机构(84.7%)。Facebook(n=110,83.9%),Twitter(n=108,82.4%),Instagram(n=100,76.3%)是使用最多的平台。受访者使用社交媒体保持更新(n=101,77.1%),网络(n=97,74%),了解会议和网络研讨会(n=97,74%),并进行学术讨论(n=84,64.1%)。在COVID-19大流行之后,100/129(77.5%)报告社交媒体使用增加。然而,只有32人(24.4%)使用它与患者联系,并对隐私以及需要单独的专业和个人账户提出了担忧。由于担心争议,四分之一的受访者不愿在社交媒体上分享他们的观点,有26人(20%)经历过网络欺凌,然而,120/130(92.3%)认为这让初级专业人士能够表达他们的观点。对区分有效内容的担忧,信息可靠性,并指出了从社交媒体中获取知识的专业观点。性别,年龄,专业,收入水平影响了社交媒体的使用模式,随着平台偏好的变化,内容参与,和目的,强调妇科肿瘤学家之间社交媒体互动的复杂景观。
    结论:虽然妇科肿瘤学家普遍使用社交媒体,特别是学术和专业发展,网络欺凌等挑战,隐私问题,对社交媒体导航进行正式培训的需求仍然存在。量身定制的培训计划和指南可以增强社交媒体在这一领域的有效和道德使用,促进专业表达和参与的安全环境。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and patterns of social media use among gynecologic oncologists for professional and academic purposes.
    METHODS: A prospective online survey between November and December 2022 targeted gynecologic oncology practitioners (gynecologic oncologists, surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation/clinical oncologists, and onco-pathologists/pathologists). The survey, distributed via various social media platforms, included 40 questions to capture qualitative and quantitative data on social media use.
    RESULTS: Of 131 respondents from 32 countries, 106 (80.9%) were gynecologic oncologists and affiliated with academic institutions (84.7%). Facebook (n=110, 83.9%), Twitter (n= 108, 82.4%), and Instagram (n=100, 76.3%) were the most used platforms. Respondents used social media to stay updated (n=101, 77.1%), network (n=97, 74%), learn about conferences and webinars (n=97, 74%), and engage in academic discussions (n=84, 64.1%). Following the COVID-19 pandemic, 100/129 (77.5%) reported increased social media use. However, only 32 (24.4%) used it to connect with patients, and concerns were raised about privacy and the need for separate professional and personal accounts. A quarter of respondents hesitated to share their opinions on social media due to the fear of controversy, with 26 (20%) experiencing cyberbullying, yet 120/130 (92.3%) believed it enabled junior professionals to express their views. Concerns about differentiating valid content, information reliability, and the professional perception of sourcing knowledge from social media were noted. Gender, age, specialty, and income level influenced patterns of social media use, with variations in preferences for platforms, content engagement, and purposes, highlighting a complex landscape of social media interaction among gynecologic oncologists.
    CONCLUSIONS: While the use of social media among gynecologic oncologists is prevalent, particularly for academic and professional development, challenges such as cyberbullying, privacy concerns, and the need for formal training in social media navigation persist. Tailored training programs and guidelines could enhance social media\'s effective and ethical use in this field, promoting a safe environment for professional expression and engagement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分子特征对于评估子宫内膜癌患者的复发风险和影响总生存期至关重要。此外,外科手术本身可以根据肿瘤的分子特征进行个性化。本研究旨在评估从宫腔镜检查期间收集的活检标本中获得可靠分子分类状态的可行性,以更好地调整适当的手术治疗。
    方法:这个单中心,回顾性,对106例子宫内膜癌患者进行了活检,然后进行了根治性手术,同时进行分子研究。通过p53和错配修复蛋白的免疫组织化学染色确定分子分类,以及POLE的基因测序。
    结果:总体而言,106名患者接受了分子调查,最终在99例患者(93.4%)中实现了这一目标。其中,对71例患者(67%)进行了术前子宫内膜活检,对28例患者(26.4%)的最终子宫标本进行了分子分析.大多数子宫内膜活检是使用Bettocchi宫腔镜进行的(66%)。7例患者(6.6%)无法进行分子分析,其中6例因样本不足,1例归因于粘膜内癌。分子研究结果表明,拷贝数低亚组是最常见的,在低风险类别中观察到5例“多分类器”。
    结论:我们从活检样本中获得分子信息的经验强调了这种技术的可行性和有效性,甚至在小组织样本中。这种能力有助于确定患者的预后组,有利于及时决策,并为每个患者制定个性化策略。
    OBJECTIVE: Molecular features are essential for estimating the risk of recurrence and impacting overall survival in patients with endometrial cancer. Additionally, the surgical procedure itself could be personalized based on the molecular characteristics of the tumor. This study aims to assess the feasibility of obtaining reliable molecular classification status from biopsy specimens collected during hysteroscopy to better modulate the appropriate surgical treatment.
    METHODS: This monocentric, retrospective, observational study was conducted on 106 patients who underwent a biopsy procedure followed by radical surgery for endometrial cancer, with concurrent molecular investigation. The molecular classification was determined through immunohistochemical staining for p53 and mismatch repair proteins, along with gene sequencing for POLE.
    RESULTS: Overall, 106 patients underwent molecular investigation, which was finally achieved on 99 patients (93.4%). Among these, the molecular analysis was conducted in 71 patients (67%) on the pre-operative endometrial biopsy and on the final uterine specimen in 28 patients (26.4%). Most of the endometrial biopsies were performed using Bettocchi hysteroscopy (66%). Molecular analysis was not possible in seven patients (6.6%), with six cases due to sample inadequacy and one case attributed to intra-mucosal carcinoma. The molecular results showed that the copy number low sub-group was the most common, and five cases of \'multiple classifiers\' were observed in the low-risk category.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our experience in obtaining molecular information from biopsy samples underscores the feasibility and efficacy of this technique, even in small tissue samples. This capability helps define the prognostic group of patients, facilitates timely decision-making, and develops a personalized strategy for each patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:膀胱阴道瘘(VVF)是最常见的获得性尿路瘘。VVF的管理主要基于专家意见和外科医生经验。本研究旨在提供印度尼西亚膀胱阴道瘘(VVF)管理的实践模式和结果。
    方法:本研究利用了2021年6月至7月在印度尼西亚转诊医院进行VVF修复的外科医生的调查结果。通过显示问卷形式的每个问题的答案的相对频率,用SPSS描述性地进行数据分析。
    结果:我们收集了93名受访者的回答,其中包括68名泌尿科医师和25名妇科医生。最常见的VVF原因是产科(50.5%)。大多数受访者通过膀胱镜检查证实了VVF的诊断(81.7%)。等待VVF修复的时间一般为12周(79.6%),而经阴道途径修复更常见(77.4%)。一个额外的程序,如组织间置术在50.5%的病例中进行。组织间置术主要表现在复发性VVF(81%),其中网膜是选择最多的组织插入(71%)。当指示时,经腹入路选择最多的方法是经膀胱开放(54,84%)。仅在7.5%的病例中进行了腹腔镜手术。总的来说,印度尼西亚VVF修复的成功率在第一次尝试时为70-100%。
    结论:经阴道方法是首选,有或没有插入组织瓣。第一次尝试的成功率是令人满意的。
    OBJECTIVE: Vesicovaginal fistulas (VVF) are the most commonly acquired fistulas of the urinary tract. The management of VVF is mainly based on expert opinion and surgeon experience. This study aims to provide the practice patterns and outcomes of vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) management in Indonesia.
    METHODS: This study utilizes the results of a survey among the surgeons who performs VVF repair in referral hospitals throughout Indonesia between June and July of 2021. Data analysis was carried out with SPSS descriptively by displaying the relative frequency of the answers to each question of the questionnaire form.
    RESULTS: We collected responses from 93 respondents consisting of 68 urologists and 25 gynecologists. The most commonly reported cause of VVF was obstetric (50.5%). Most respondents confirmed the diagnosis of VVF by cystoscopy (81.7%). Waiting time to repair VVF was generally 12 weeks (79.6%), while the transvaginal approach repair was more often performed (77.4%). An additional procedure, such as tissue interposition was performed in 50.5% of cases. Tissue interposition was mostly indicated in recurrent VVF (81%), with omentum being the most selected tissue interposition (71%). When indicated, the most selected method of transabdominal approach was open transvesical (54,84%). A laparoscopic approach was performed only in 7.5% of cases. Overall, the success rate for VVF repair in Indonesia was 70-100% at first attempt.
    CONCLUSIONS: The transvaginal approach is preferred, either with or without an interposition tissue flap. The success rate at the first attempt is satisfactory.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:子宫脱垂的治疗提出了重大的临床挑战,通常需要手术干预来缓解症状和恢复盆底功能。然而,子宫脱垂的最佳手术方式仍不确定,促使进行全面的荟萃分析,以比较各种手术方法的疗效。本研究旨在评估不同手术方法治疗子宫脱垂的有效性。
    方法:采用计算机检索检索相关文献,比较不同手术方式治疗子宫脱垂的疗效。搜索是在WebofScience和PubMed数据库中进行的,并获得了直到2023年10月发表的文章。我们采用随机效应和固定效应模型,并使用R软件进行荟萃分析。
    结果:本研究包括40篇标准论文,涵盖25,896例子宫脱垂患者。我们使用随机和固定效应模型对子宫切除术和子宫固定术进行荟萃分析。结果表明,不同的手术入路对手术成功率没有显著影响(I2=69%,p<0.01;风险比(RR)(95%置信区间(CI):1.00[0.98;1.03])或术后不良反应(I2=54%,p<0.01;RR(95%CI),1.10[0.83;1.45])。然而,子宫切除术的手术持续时间(I2=91%,p<0.01;标准化平均差(SMD)(95%CI),0.78[0.49;1.07]),手术失血(I2=97%,p<0.01,SMD(95%CI):1.14[0.21;2.07]),术中不良反应(I2=0%,p=0.61,RR(95%CI):1.37[1.10;1.71])在子宫切除术和子宫固定术之间具有统计学意义。此外,发表偏倚和敏感性检验显示,本荟萃分析中没有发表偏倚,也没有引起显著敏感性的文献.
    结论:在子宫脱垂的治疗中,子宫切除术和子宫固定术在手术成功率和术后不良反应方面相似.然而,子宫切除术与手术持续时间较长有关,与子宫固定术相比,出血量增加,术中不良反应发生率更高。
    OBJECTIVE: The management of uterine prolapse poses a significant clinical challenge, with surgical intervention often necessary for symptom relief and restoration of pelvic floor function. However, the optimal surgical approach for uterine prolapse remains uncertain, prompting a comprehensive meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of various surgical methods. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of different surgical methods for treating uterine prolapse.
    METHODS: We used computer search to retrieve relevant literature to compare the therapeutic effects of different surgical methods for treating uterine prolapse. The search was conducted in the Web of Science and PubMed databases, and articles published until October 2023 were obtained. We employed random effects and fixed effects models and performed a meta-analysis using the R software.
    RESULTS: This study included 40 standard papers covering 25,896 patients with uterine prolapse. We used random and fixed effects models to conduct a meta-analysis of hysterectomy and uterine fixation procedures. The findings indicated that different surgical approaches had no significant impact on surgical success rates (I2 = 69%, p < 0.01; risk ratio (RR) (95% confidence intervals (CI)): 1.00 [0.98; 1.03]) or postoperative adverse reactions (I2 = 54%, p < 0.01; RR (95% CI), 1.10 [0.83; 1.45]). However, the durations of the surgical procedure for hysterectomy (I2 = 91%, p < 0.01; standardized mean difference (SMD) (95% CI), 0.78 [0.49; 1.07]), surgical blood loss (I2 = 97%, p < 0.01, SMD (95% CI): 1.14 [0.21; 2.07]), and intraoperative adverse reactions (I2 = 0%, p = 0.61, RR (95% CI): 1.37 [1.10; 1.71]) were statistically significant between hysterectomy and uterine fixation procedures. Additionally, publication bias and sensitivity tests showed no publication bias in this meta-analysis and no literature causing significant sensitivity.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of uterine prolapse, both hysterectomy and uterine fixation are similar in terms of surgical success rates and postoperative adverse reactions. However, hysterectomy is associated with longer duration of the surgical procedure, increased blood loss and higher incidence of intraoperative adverse reactions compared to uterine fixation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    达芬奇单端口®(SP)机器人平台预示着微创手术(MIS)的新时代。这项研究的主要目的是评估接受SP机器人子宫切除术并伴有sc结直肠切除术治疗盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的患者的短期预后。我们在2021年1月至2023年8月期间在两个三级护理中心进行了回顾性病例系列研究。包括选择接受SP机器人子宫切除术并伴随骶结肠结肠切除术的POP患者。图表抽象用于收集患者的人口统计学和临床结果。复发性POP被定义为新的令人烦恼的阴道隆起症状,以及术后检查处女膜以外的POP证据。包括69名患者。中位手术时间为209分钟(135-312),估计失血量为100mL(20-2000)。1例(1.4%)患者遭受了主要的血管损伤,导致剖腹手术。PACU中的中位疼痛评分和吗啡当量分别为3(0-7)和3.2(0-27)。3个月时,60例(86.9%)患者被亲自或通过远程医疗进行随访。59/60(98.3%)报告无阴道隆起症状,50/51(98.0%)在检查时出现0或1期脱垂。一名(1.4%)患者复发性脱垂并接受了额外的修复。术后并发症包括2例(2.9%)肠梗阻/小肠梗阻,1例(1.4%)需要输血的盆腔血肿,1(1.4%)脐疝。SP机器人平台是一个安全可行的MIS子宫切除术和骶结肠切除术平台,具有良好的短期解剖和症状性结果。
    The Da Vinci single port® (SP) robotic platform heralds a new era of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). The primary objective of this study was to assess short-term outcomes in patients undergoing SP robotic hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We performed a retrospective case series at two tertiary care centers between January 2021 and August 2023. Patients with POP electing to undergo SP robotic hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy were included. Chart abstraction was used to collect patient demographics and clinical outcomes. Recurrent POP was defined as new bothersome vaginal bulge symptoms and evidence of POP beyond the hymen on postoperative examination. 69 patients were included. Median operative time was 209 min (135-312) and estimated blood loss was 100 mL (20-2000). 1 (1.4%) patient sustained a major vascular injury resulting in laparotomy. Median pain score and morphine equivalents administered in PACU were low at 3 (0-7) and 3.2 (0-27) respectively. At 3 months, 60 (86.9%) patients were seen either in person or via telemedicine for their follow up appointment. 59/60 (98.3%) reported no vaginal bulge symptoms and 50/51 (98.0%) had stage 0 or 1 prolapse on exam. One (1.4%) patient had recurrent prolapse and underwent an additional repair. Postoperative complications included 2 (2.9%) cases of ileus/small bowel obstruction, 1 (1.4%) pelvic hematoma requiring a blood transfusion, and 1 (1.4%) umbilical hernia. The SP robotic platform is a safe and feasible platform for MIS hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy with good short term anatomic and symptomatic outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    这项研究研究了不同的目标导向液体治疗类型如何影响机器人辅助腹腔镜妇科手术期间的低血压和液体输注。他们使用颈动脉校正流量时间(FTc)和潮气量刺激脉压变化(VtPPV)检查患者的容量状态和反应性。研究结果表明,各种液体治疗目标显着影响术中低血压和液体需求。然而,该研究仅采用单侧颈动脉超声评估,可能忽略左右颈动脉之间血流的生理或病理变化。这种方法选择引起了人们的关注,因为指南建议进行双边测量以进行更全面的评估。缺乏双边评估可能会影响研究的可靠性和可重复性。证明单侧测量方法的合理性对于验证临床发现至关重要。未来的研究应采用双侧颈动脉超声评估或为单侧测量提供详细的基本原理,以增强临床评估的鲁棒性和准确性。
    This study examined how different goal-directed fluid therapy types affected low blood pressure and fluid infusion during robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecological surgery. They used carotid corrected flow time (FTc) and tidal volume stimulation pulse pressure variation (VtPPV) to check the patient\'s volume status and responsiveness. The findings indicated that various fluid therapy targets significantly influence intraoperative hypotension and fluid requirements. However, the study exclusively employed unilateral carotid ultrasound assessments, potentially overlooking physiological or pathological variations in blood flow between the left and right carotid arteries. This methodological choice raises concerns as guidelines recommend bilateral measurements for a more comprehensive evaluation. The lack of bilateral assessments could affect the study\'s reliability and reproducibility. Justifying the unilateral measurement approach is essential for validating clinical findings. Future research should adopt bilateral carotid ultrasound assessments or provide a detailed rationale for unilateral measurements to enhance the robustness and accuracy of clinical evaluations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇综述的目的是绘制当前有关机器人手术治疗的妇科患者需求的研究。系统快速审查。Pubmed,WebofScience,谷歌学者。搜索从2017-2021年开始受到限制。遵循系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)声明的首选报告项目。快速审查是在比系统审查更短的时间内产生的信息的综合,这允许临床护士在决策过程中获得证据。实施的方法步骤如下:(1)需求评估和选题,(2)研究发展,(3)文献检索,(4)筛选和研究选择,(5)数据提取,(6)偏差风险评估和(7)知识综合。搜索产生了815篇文章,筛选标题和摘要后,746人被排除在外,并进行了69篇全文综合。最终分析中只包含了10篇文章。这项研究评估了机器人手术对七个主题下患者的影响;手术时间,逗留时间,并发症,估计失血量,疼痛,幸存者,和转换。五项研究是关于子宫内膜癌的,一项关于妇科癌症的研究,关于子宫切除术的两项研究,一项关于患者安全的研究,和一项关于宫颈癌的研究。结果表明,机器人手术可以通过解决妇科患者的持续问题来改变患者的需求。这需要更好地了解机器人手术程序,同时促进护理而不是患者护理。
    The aim of this review is to map the current research on the needs of gynecological patients treated with robotic surgery. Systematic Rapid Review. Pubmed, Web of Science, Google Scholar. Search was limited from the years 2017-2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement was followed. Rapid review is a synthesis of information produced in a shorter time than systematic reviews, which allows clinical nurses to access evidence in the decision-making process. The methodological steps implemented were the following: (1) needs assessment and topic selection, (2) study development, (3) literature search, (4) screening and study selection, (5) data extraction, (6) risk-of-bias assessment and (7) knowledge synthesis. The search yielded 815 articles, 746 were excluded after screening the title and abstract, and 69 full-text syntheses were performed. Only 10 articles were included in the final analysis. This research evaluated the effects of robotic surgery on the patient under seven themes; operative time, length of stay, complications, estimated blood loss, pain, survivor, and conversion. Five studies were on endometrial cancer, one study on gynecologic cancer, two studies on hysterectomy, one study on patient safety, and one study on cervical cancer. The results show that robotic surgery can change the needs of patients by solving ongoing problems in gynecological patients. This requires a better understanding of robotic surgery procedures while facilitating nursing care over patient care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号