Gastric ultrasound

胃超声
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:未能遵守围手术期禁食要求会增加误吸风险,并可能导致手术延迟或取消。护理点胃超声可以指导决策延迟,取消或继续手术。
    方法:本研究的目的是描述在患有已知的禁食指南违反择期手术的儿科患者中,使用定点护理胃超声检查的胃内容物。这是对出现“无口服”违反(根据禁食指南)或不清楚禁食状态的择期手术的患者的胃超声扫描的单中心回顾。主要结果是使用护理点超声描述胃内容物。超声检查结果被归类为低风险的误吸(空,澄清液<1.5ml/kg),高风险(固体,澄清液>1.5ml/kg),或者不确定的研究。将胃超声检查结果传达给主治麻醉师。对于没有延迟进行的患者,根据美国麻醉医师协会的禁食指南,将节省的估计时间定义为超声扫描时间与假定病例开始时间之间的差异。
    结果:我们确定了106例患者,中位年龄为4.8岁。有31例患者(29.2%)的超声检查发现了高危胃内容物。这些病人有延迟的病例,取消或继续进行快速顺序插管。66例患者(62.3%)被确定为低风险的胃内容物,并立即进行手术。对于这些患者来说,中位数为2.6小时。没有记录到任何患者的误吸事件。
    结论:使用术前护理点胃超声来确定胃内容物,并对出现禁食不依从的择期手术的儿科患者进行风险分层是可行的。术前胃超声可能在确定该患者人群的麻醉管理变化中起作用。
    BACKGROUND: Failure to adhere to perioperative fasting requirements increases aspiration risk and can lead to delay or cancellation of surgery. Point of care gastric ultrasound may guide decision-making to delay, cancel or proceed with surgery.
    METHODS: This study aimed to describe gastric contents using point of care gastric ultrasound in pediatric patients with known fasting guideline violations presenting for elective surgery. This was a single-center retrospectivechart review of gastric ultrasound scans in patients presenting for elective surgeries with \"nothing by mouth\" violation (per fasting guidelines) or unclear fasting status. The primary outcome is description of gastric contents using point of care ultrasound. The ultrasound findings were classified as low-risk for aspiration (empty, clear fluid < 1.5 ml/kg), high-risk (solids, clear fluid > 1.5 ml/kg), or inconclusive study. Gastric ultrasound findings were communicated to the attending anesthesiologist. For patients proceeding without delay the estimated time saved was defined as the difference between ultrasound scan time and presumed case start time based on American Society of Anesthesiologists fasting guidelines.
    RESULTS: We identified 106 patients with a median age of 4.8 years. There were 31 patients (29.2%) that had ultrasound finding of high-risk gastric contents. These patients had cases that were delayed, cancelled or proceeded with rapid sequence intubation. Sixty-six patients (62.3%) were determined to be low-risk gastric contents and proceeded with surgery without delay. For these patients, a median of 2.6 h was saved. No aspiration events were recorded for any patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to use preoperative point of care gastric ultrasound to determine stomach contents and risk-stratify pediatric patients presenting for elective surgical procedures with fasting non-adherence. Preoperative gastric ultrasound may have a role in determining changes in anesthetic management in this patient population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是证明在2小时禁食期间右侧卧位(RLDP)的胃横截面积(CSA)不大于常规的4小时禁食期间小儿超声心动图检查。
    方法:93名年龄在3岁以下的患者被安排在镇静下进行超声心动图检查,并随机分为两组:2小时禁食和4小时禁食。对于组4h(n=46),要求患者禁食所有类型的液体超过4小时,而2h组(n=47)在超声心动图检查前要求对所有类型的液体禁食2h。超声心动图前进行胃超声检查,和CSARLDP进行测量。我们比较了CSARLDP,高危胃病的发生率,禁食持续时间,和主要(肺吸入,吸入性肺炎)和轻微并发症(恶心,干涩,呕吐,呼吸暂停,和心动过缓)在两组之间。
    结果:CSARLDP(组2h-组4h)的平均差为0.49(-0.18至1.17)cm2,在非劣效性范围内(Δ=2.1cm2)。高危胃癌的发生率无差异(P=0.514)。两组主要和次要并发症的发生率差异无统计学意义。
    结论:需要超声心动图检查的儿科患者禁食2小时并没有显著增加主要和次要并发症和CSA。
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the gastric cross-sectional area (CSA) in the right lateral decubitus position (RLDP) during a 2-h fasting period is not larger than that during a conventional 4-h fasting period prior to pediatric echocardiography.
    METHODS: 93 patients aged under 3 years scheduled for echocardiography under sedation were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups; 2-h fasting vs 4-h fasting. For group 4 h (n = 46), the patients were asked to be fasted for all types of liquid for more than 4 h, while group 2 h (n = 47) were asked to be fasted for all types of liquid for 2 h before echocardiography. Gastric ultrasound was performed before echocardiography, and CSARLDP was measured. We compared CSARLDP, incidence of at-risk stomach, fasting duration, and the incidence of major (pulmonary aspiration, aspiration pneumonia) and minor complications (nausea, retching, and vomiting, apnea, and bradycardia) between two groups.
    RESULTS: The mean difference of CSARLDP (group 2 h-group 4 h) was 0.49 (- 0.18 to 1.17) cm2, and it was within the non-inferiority margin (Δ = 2.1 cm2). There was no difference in the incidence of at-risk stomach (P = 0.514). There was no significant difference in the incidence of major and minor complications between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Two-hour fasting in pediatric patients who need an echocardiography did not increase major and minor complications and CSA significantly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目的:胃超声的解释依赖于临床算法的使用,该算法将胃窦内容物的定性分析与液体内容物的体积计算相结合。这种参考方法可能难以在产妇中应用。因此,我们旨在评估仰卧位简单定性评估的诊断准确性,以诊断产妇的高危胃内容物。我们还基于与参考方法中使用的数学模型不同的数学模型,评估了复合量表和另一种临床算法的诊断准确性。
    方法:前瞻性观察性队列研究。
    方法:大学医院,里昂,法国。
    方法:成年女性进入产房。
    方法:入院后第一小时内进行定性和定量胃超声检查。
    方法:关于参考方法,评估了简单定性评估对高危胃内容物诊断的诊断准确性.复合量表和另一种临床算法的诊断准确性,并评估了每种方法之间的协议。
    结果:共纳入235例产妇并进行分析。简单的定性评估导致233(99%)女性的超声评估,而参考方法对213名(91%)女性进行了结论性评估(P<0.05)。简单定性评估的敏感性和特异性分别为97%(95CI:93至99%)和96%(95CI:90至99%),分别。这些与复合量表和临床算法没有显着差异。这四种方法显示出几乎完美的一致性。
    结论:这些结果表明,简单的定性评估可能有助于在临床实践中帮助麻醉师评估胃内容物状态和误吸风险。
    Interpretation of gastric ultrasound relies on the use of a clinical algorithm that combines qualitative analysis of the gastric antrum contents with the calculation of the volume of fluid contents. This reference method may be difficult to apply in the parturient. We therefore aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a simple qualitative assessment in the supine position for the diagnosis of high-risk gastric contents in the parturient. We also assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a composite scale and another clinical algorithm based on a mathematical model different to that used in the reference method.
    Prospective observational cohort study.
    University hospital, Lyon, France.
    Adult women admitted to the delivery room.
    Qualitative and quantitative gastric ultrasound examination within the first hour following admission.
    With respect to the reference method, the diagnostic accuracy of a simple qualitative assessment for the diagnosis of high-risk gastric contents was assessed. The diagnostic accuracy of a composite scale and another clinical algorithm, and the agreement between each approach were also assessed.
    A total of 235 parturients were included and analyzed. The simple qualitative assessment led to conclusive ultrasound assessment in 233 (99%) women, while the reference method led to conclusive assessment in 213 (91%) women (P < 0.05). The sensitivity and the specificity of the simple qualitative assessment were 97% (95%CI: 93 to 99%) and 96% (95%CI: 90 to 99%), respectively. These were not significantly different from those of the composite scale and the clinical algorithm. The four approaches showed almost perfect agreement with each other.
    These results suggest that simple qualitative assessment may be useful in clinical practice to help the anesthesiologist in the assessment of gastric contents status and risk of aspiration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:这项多中心前瞻性观察性研究旨在确定进入产科分娩的妇女中高风险胃内容物的患病率和相关因素,并确定超声评估胃内容物将最有帮助的临床情况(即当高风险胃内容物的患病率接近50%时)。
    方法:在入院后的第一个小时内对胃内容物进行超声评估。计算了高危胃内容物的患病率,并使用逻辑回归分析确定了与高危胃内容物相关的变量。
    结果:共分析了1003例产妇。在自然分娩的女性中,高危胃内容物的患病率为70%(379/544;95%置信区间:66-74%),在整个队列中占65%(646/1003;95%置信区间:61-67%)。胎龄较低,增加固体的禁食时间,和选择性剖腹产与高危胃内容物的可能性降低独立相关。在自然分娩的女性和整个队列中,在固体<6小时的禁食期间,高危胃内容物的患病率为85%至86%,空腹6-8小时63%-68%,空腹8-12小时为54%-55%,
    结论:约三分之二的产妇在入院后的第一小时内胃内容物有高风险。我们的结果表明,在劳动妇女中,固体的胃排空仍在继续,禁食时间≥8小时时,胃超声检查将最有帮助。
    BACKGROUND: This multicentre prospective observational study sought to determine the prevalence and the factors associated with high-risk gastric contents in women admitted to the maternity unit for childbirth, and to identify the clinical situations in which ultrasound assessment of gastric contents would be most helpful (i.e. when the prevalence of high-risk gastric contents is close to 50%).
    METHODS: Ultrasound assessments of gastric contents were performed within the first hour after admission to the maternity unit. The prevalence of high-risk gastric contents was calculated and variables associated with high-risk gastric contents were identified using logistic regression analyses.
    RESULTS: A total of 1003 parturients were analysed. The prevalence of high-risk gastric contents was 70% (379/544; 95% confidence interval: 66-74%) in women admitted in spontaneous labour and 65% (646/1003; 95% confidence interval: 61-67%) in the whole cohort. Lower gestational age, increased fasting duration for solids, and elective Caesarean delivery were independently associated with reduced likelihood of high-risk gastric contents. In women admitted in spontaneous labour and in the whole cohort, the prevalence of high-risk gastric contents ranged from 85% to 86% for fasting duration for solids <6 h, 63%-68% for fasting 6-8 h, 54%-55% for fasting 8-12 h, and 47%-51% for fasting ≥12 h.
    CONCLUSIONS: Around two-thirds of parturients had high-risk gastric contents within the first hour after admission to the maternity unit. Our results suggest that gastric emptying for solids continues in labouring women, and that gastric ultrasound would be most helpful when fasting duration is ≥8 h.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:先前的研究表明,关于胃排空液体的决定因素的结果相互矛盾。我们的目的是比较不同热量和营养素含量的液体的胃排空时间。
    方法:健康的成年志愿者在饮用不同热量和营养成分的饮料后4小时进行胃超声评估,采用交叉设计(含3%脂肪的燕麦饮料[310千卡],芒果汁[310千卡],含0.5%脂肪[185千卡]的燕麦饮料,和黑醋栗汁[175千卡])。胃排空时间,胃内容物体积,计算胃内容物体积-时间曲线下面积(AUC)。
    结果:8名女性和8名男性完成了研究方案。黑醋栗汁的平均(SD)胃排空时间为89(32)分钟,含0.5%脂肪的燕麦饮料127(54)分钟,芒果汁135(36)分钟,含3%脂肪的燕麦饮料为152(40)分钟。含3%脂肪(P=0.007)和芒果汁(P=0.025)的燕麦饮料的胃排空时间比黑醋栗汁慢。在摄入后1小时,芒果汁(P=0.021)和含3%脂肪的燕麦饮料(P=0.003)的胃内容物体积大于黑醋栗汁。含3%脂肪的燕麦饮料的AUC高于芒果汁(P=0.029),含0.5%脂肪的燕麦饮料(P=0.004),和黑醋栗汁(P=0.002),且芒果汁优于黑醋栗汁(P=0.019)。
    结论:热量和营养素含量显著影响胃排空时间。与低热量果汁(黑醋栗)相比,高热量果汁(芒果)的排空时间延迟。
    背景:ISRCTN17147574。
    BACKGROUND: Previous studies demonstrated conflicting results regarding the determinants of gastric emptying for fluids. Our aim was to compare gastric emptying times of fluids with different caloric and nutrient content.
    METHODS: Healthy adult volunteers underwent gastric ultrasound assessment for 4 h after consuming beverages with different caloric and nutrient content using a crossover design (oat drink with 3% fat [310 kcal], mango juice [310 kcal], oat drink with 0.5% fat [185 kcal], and blackcurrant juice [175 kcal]). Gastric emptying time, gastric content volume, and the area under the curve (AUC) of gastric content volume-time profiles were calculated.
    RESULTS: Eight females and eight males completed the study protocol. The mean (sd) gastric emptying times were 89 (32) min for blackcurrant juice, 127 (54) min for oat drink with 0.5% fat, 135 (36) min for mango juice, and 152 (40) min for oat drink with 3% fat. Gastric emptying times were slower for oat drink with 3% fat (P=0.007) and mango juice (P=0.025) than for blackcurrant juice. At 1 h after ingestion, gastric content volume was greater for mango juice (P=0.021) and oat drink with 3% fat (P=0.003) than for blackcurrant juice. The AUC was greater for oat drink with 3% fat than mango juice (P=0.029), oat drink with 0.5% fat (P=0.004), and blackcurrant juice (P=0.002), and for mango juice than blackcurrant juice (P=0.019).
    CONCLUSIONS: Caloric and nutrient content significantly affected gastric emptying times. A high-calorie fruit juice (mango) exhibited delayed emptying times compared with a low-calorie fruit juice (blackcurrant).
    BACKGROUND: ISRCTN17147574.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:在全身麻醉诱导期间,适当的面罩通气对于防止空气流入胃很重要,并且难以仅通过气管发送气流而没有胃膨胀。比较了麻醉诱导过程中根据面罩通气的胃吹气变化。
    方法:在此前瞻性中,随机化,单盲研究,在麻醉诱导期间,将230例患者分为面罩通气组(通气组)或无通气组(呼吸暂停组)。失去意识后,对于通气组,采用双手保持面罩技术,在吸气压力为15cmH2O的压力控制通气2分钟.对于呼吸暂停组,只有面罩安装在脸上一分钟,没有通风。接下来,进行气管插管。胃横截面积(CSA,cm2)在诱导前后使用超声波测量。二氧化碳气腹后,每组的外科医生对手术视图的胃吹入进行分级.
    结果:通气组和呼吸暂停组的超声诱导后窦道CSA的增加没有显着差异(0.04±0.3和0.02±0.28,p值=0.225)。此外,根据外科医生的判断,两组的手术等级无显著差异。
    结论:在15cmH2O的吸气压力下进行2分钟的压力控制通气不会增加胃窦CSA和腹腔镜下的胃吹气。
    背景:http://cris。nih.走吧。2019年3月13日kr(KCT0003620)。
    Proper mask ventilation is important to prevent air inflow into the stomach during induction of general anesthesia, and it is difficult to send airflow only through the trachea without gastric inflation. Changes in gastric insufflation according to mask ventilation during anesthesia induction were compared.
    In this prospective, randomized, single-blind study, 230 patients were analyzed to a facemask-ventilated group (Ventilation group) or no-ventilation group (Apnea group) during anesthesia induction. After loss of consciousness, pressure-controlled ventilation at an inspiratory pressure of 15 cmH2O was performed for two minutes with a two-handed mask-hold technique for Ventilation group. For Apnea group, only the facemask was fitted to the face for one minute with no ventilation. Next, endotracheal intubation was performed. The gastric cross-sectional area (CSA, cm2) was measured using ultrasound before and after induction. After pneumoperitoneum with carbon dioxide, gastric insufflation of the surgical view was graded by the surgeon for each group.
    Increase of postinduction antral CSA on ultrasound were not significantly different between Ventilation group and Apnea group (0.04 ± 0.3 and 0.02 ± 0.28, p-value = 0.225). Additionally, there were no significant differences between the two groups in surgical grade according to surgeon\'s judgement.
    Pressure-controlled ventilation at an inspiratory pressure of 15 cmH2O for two minutes did not increase gastric antral CSA and insufflation of stomach by laparoscopic view.
    http://cris.nih.go.kr (KCT0003620) on 13/3/2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    ICU中通气患者在气管拔管前禁食是常见的做法,旨在减少胃容量和误吸风险。由于在拔管时胃内容物的体积是未知的,这种做法的有效性是不确定的。
    预期,使用胃超声进行观察性研究。在四个时间点获得图像:(i)在基线,运行胃饲料;(ii)通过胃管抽吸胃内容物后;(iii)在没有胃饲料运行的4小时后;(iv)在禁食4小时和胃管抽吸后。主要结果是每种干预措施被归类为低误吸风险的患者比例。使用定性和定量胃超声。
    纳入54例ICU患者。44(81%)受试者的图像适合分析。通过胃管吸入胃内容物和禁食相当于39/44(88.6%)和5/44(11.4%)被分类为低风险和有误吸风险的受试者,分别。禁食,然后进行抽吸,导致41/44(93.2%)患者处于低风险状态。
    通过胃管吸取胃内容物和4小时禁食期间在将胃体积减少到安全阈值以下时似乎是等效的。尽管采取了所有干预措施,但仍有一小部分未达到阈值。
    UNASSIGNED: A period of fasting before tracheal extubation of ventilated patients in the ICU is common practice, aiming to reduce gastric volume and aspiration risk. As the volume of gastric content is unknown at the time of extubation, the efficacy of this practice is uncertain.
    UNASSIGNED: A prospective, observational study using gastric ultrasound was undertaken. Images were obtained at four time points: (i) at baseline, with gastric feeds running; (ii) after suctioning of gastric contents through a gastric tube; (iii) after a 4 h period with no gastric feed running; and (iv) after both a 4 h fasting period and gastric tube suctioning. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients classed as low risk of aspiration with each intervention, using qualitative and quantitative gastric ultrasound.
    UNASSIGNED: Fifty-four patients in the ICU were enrolled. Forty-four (81%) subjects had images that were suitable for analysis. Suctioning of stomach content through a gastric tube and fasting were equivalent with 39/44 (88.6%) and 5/44 (11.4%) subjects classified as low risk and at risk of aspiration, respectively. A period of fasting followed by suction resulted in 41/44 (93.2%) patients being at low risk.
    UNASSIGNED: Suctioning of stomach contents through the gastric tube and a 4 h fasting period appear equivalent at reducing gastric volume below a safe threshold. A small percentage did not reach the threshold despite all interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    定点护理胃超声检查提供了一种客观的方法,可以在诱导全身麻醉之前评估个体的肺吸入风险。我们旨在评估在单个中心接受择期或急诊手术的成年患者队列中常规术前胃超声对围手术期管理的潜在影响。根据术前胃部超声检查结果,患者被归类为低风险(空,胃液量≤1.5ml。kg-1体重)或高风险(固体,混合或胃液体积>1.5毫升。kg-1体重)的吸入。超声检查后,研究者被要求在吸入风险管理方面做出改变(没有;更保守;更自由),以适应他们预先定义的麻醉计划,并在患者安全面临风险时进行调整.我们纳入了2003名患者,其中1246例(62%)接受了择期手术和757例(38%)急诊手术。在接受择期手术的患者中,1046/1246(84%)具有低风险和178/1246(14%)高风险的胃,这是587/757(78%)158/757(21%)在接受急诊手术的患者中,分别。常规术前胃部超声检查使379/2003(19%)患者的麻醉管理发生了变化,在303/2003年(15%),这些方法是一种更自由的方法。在接受择期手术的患者中,术前胃部超声检查将允许170/1246(14%)采用更宽松的方法,并在52/1246(4%)中采用更保守的方法,而在接受急诊手术的患者中,133/757(18%)的管理会更宽松,24/757(3%)的管理会更保守。我们表明,术前胃超声有助于识别有误吸风险的患者的高危和低危情况,并为围手术期管理增加了有用的信息。我们的数据表明,术前胃超声的常规使用可能会改善个性化护理,并可能影响患者的安全性。
    Point-of-care gastric sonography offers an objective approach to assessing individual pulmonary aspiration risk before induction of general anaesthesia. We aimed to evaluate the potential impact of routine pre-operative gastric ultrasound on peri-operative management in a cohort of adult patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery at a single centre. According to pre-operative gastric ultrasound results, patients were classified as low risk (empty, gastric fluid volume ≤ 1.5 ml.kg-1 body weight) or high risk (solid, mixed or gastric fluid volume > 1.5 ml.kg-1 body weight) of aspiration. After sonography, examiners were asked to indicate changes in aspiration risk management (none; more conservative; more liberal) to their pre-defined anaesthetic plan and to adapt it if patient safety was at risk. We included 2003 patients, 1246 (62%) of which underwent elective and 757 (38%) emergency surgery. Among patients who underwent elective surgery, 1046/1246 (84%) had a low-risk and 178/1246 (14%) a high-risk stomach, with this being 587/757 (78%) vs. 158/757 (21%) among patients undergoing emergency surgery, respectively. Routine pre-operative gastric sonography enabled changes in anaesthetic management in 379/2003 (19%) of patients, with these being a more liberal approach in 303/2003 (15%). In patients undergoing elective surgery, pre-operative gastric sonography would have allowed a more liberal approach in 170/1246 (14%) and made a more conservative approach indicated in 52/1246 (4%), whereas in patients undergoing emergency surgery, 133/757 (18%) would have been managed more liberally and 24/757 (3%) more conservatively. We showed that pre-operative gastric ultrasound helps to identify high- and low-risk situations in patients at risk of aspiration and adds useful information to peri-operative management. Our data suggest that routine use of pre-operative gastric ultrasound may improve individualised care and potentially impact patient safety.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    We aimed to assess the accuracy of ultrasonographic measurement of the antral cross-sectional area (CSA) in the preprocedural evaluation of gastric contents and volume in fasted patients > 60 yr of age scheduled for gastroscopy under sedation.
    We included n = 81 patients > 60 yr of age and n = 79 younger controls scheduled to undergo elective gastroscopy in a prospective cohort study. A gastric ultrasound examination was performed to measure the antral CSA in both semisitting and right lateral decubitus (RLD) positions. Afterward, patients were graded using the Perlas qualitative grading scale. The actual gastric volume was endoscopically suctioned. Full stomach was defined as gastric volume > 1.5 mL·kg-1 and/or the presence of solid particles. We constructed receiver operating characteristic curves to determine the accuracy of ultrasonographic measurement of RLD CSA to detect a gastric volume > 1.5 mL·kg-1 and calculated the diagnostic test attributes of RLD CSA for the identification of a gastric volume > 1.5 mL·kg-1 RESULTS: The incidence of full stomach was 8/81 (9.8%) in patients > 60 yr of age and 1/79 (1.2%) in young patients (risk difference, 8.6%; 95% CI, 1.3 to 15.8; P = 0.03). The cut-off value of RLD CSA was 10.4 cm2 for the detection of gastric volume > 1.5 mL·kg-1 in patients > 60 yr of age, with a sensitivity of 75%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 98.6%.
    Patients > 60 yr of age scheduled for gastroscopy under sedation had a higher incidence of a full stomach detected with ultrasound compared with a younger cohort, which is potentially associated with a higher aspiration risk. We calculated a cut-off value of RLD CSA for detecting gastric volume in patients > 60 yr of age of approximately 10 cm2, which may help to quickly assess patients at risk of aspiration.
    www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100048994); registered 19 July 2021.
    RéSUMé: CONTEXTE: Notre objectif était d’évaluer la précision de la mesure échographique de la section transversale antrale (CSA) dans l’évaluation préprocédurale du contenu et du volume gastriques chez les patient·es à jeun > 60 ans devant bénéficier d’une gastroscopie sous sédation. MéTHODE: Nous avons inclus n = 81 patient·es > 60 ans et n = 79 patient·es témoins plus jeunes devant bénéficier d’une gastroscopie non urgente dans une étude de cohorte prospective. Une échographie gastrique a été réalisée pour mesurer la CSA antrale en position semi-assise et en décubitus latéral droit (DLD). Par la suite, la patientèle a été classée à l’aide de l’échelle de classement qualitatif de Perlas. Le volume gastrique réel était aspiré par endoscopie. Un estomac plein a été défini comme un volume gastrique > 1,5 mL·kg–1 et/ou la présence de particules solides. Nous avons construit des courbes de la fonction d’efficacité du récepteur (courbes ROC) afin de déterminer la précision de la mesure échographique de la CSA en DLD pour détecter un volume gastrique > 1,5 mL·kg–1 et calculé les attributs du test diagnostique de la CSA en DLD pour identifier un volume gastrique > 1,5 mL·kg–1. RéSULTATS: L’incidence d’estomac plein était de 8/81 (9,8 %) chez les patient·es > 60 ans et 1/79 (1,2 %) chez les patient·es jeunes (différence de risque, 8,6 %; IC 95 %, 1,3 à 15,8; P = 0,03). La valeur seuil de la CSA en DLD était de 10,4 cm2 pour la détection d’un volume gastrique > 1,5 mL·kg–1 chez la patientèle > 60 ans, avec une sensibilité de 75 %, une spécificité de 100 %, une valeur prédictive positive de 100 % et une valeur prédictive négative de 98,6 %. CONCLUSION: La patientèle > 60 ans devant bénéficier d’une gastroscopie sous sédation avait une incidence plus élevée d’estomac plein détecté par échographie par rapport à une cohorte plus jeune, ce qui est potentiellement associé à un risque d’aspiration plus élevé. Nous avons calculé une valeur seuil de la CSA en DLD pour détecter le volume gastrique chez les patient·es > 60 ans d’environ 10 cm2, ce qui peut aider à évaluer rapidement les personnes à risque d’aspiration. ENREGISTREMENT DE L’éTUDE: www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100048994); enregistrée le 19 juillet 2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have become increasingly popular as both diabetic and weight loss therapies. One effect of this class of medication is delayed gastric emptying, which may impact the risk of aspiration during anesthesia delivery.
    In this prospective study, we used gastric ultrasound to evaluate the presence of solid gastric contents in both supine and lateral positions after an eight-hour fast in those taking GLP-1RA compared with controls. Participants underwent a second ultrasound evaluation two hours later after drinking 12 fluid ounces of water (approximately 350 mL).
    Twenty adults voluntarily enrolled, giving a total of ten participants in each group. In the supine position, 70% of semaglutide participants and 10% of control participants had solids present on gastric ultrasound (risk ratio [RR], 3.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26 to 9.65; P = 0.02.) In the lateral position, 90% of semaglutide participants and 20% of control participants had solids identified on gastric ultrasound (RR, 7.36; 95% CI, 1.13 to 47.7; P = 0.005). Two hours after drinking clear liquids, the two groups did not differ in the lateral position, but in the supine position, 90% of control group participants were rated as empty compared with only 30% of semaglutide group participants (P = 0.02).
    This study provides preliminary evidence that GLP-1RAs may affect gastric emptying and residual gastric contents following an overnight fast and two hours after clear liquids, which may have implications for aspiration risk during anesthetic care.
    RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Les agonistes des récepteurs du peptide-1 de type glucagon (GLP-1) (AR-GLP-1) sont de plus en plus populaires comme traitements du diabète et pour la perte de poids. L’un des effets de cette classe de médicaments est le retard de la vidange gastrique, ce qui peut avoir un impact sur le risque d’aspiration pendant l’administration de l’anesthésie. MéTHODE: Dans cette étude prospective, nous avons utilisé l’échographie gastrique pour évaluer la présence de contenu gastrique solide en décubitus dorsal et latéral après un jeûne de huit heures chez les personnes prenant des AR-GLP-1 par rapport à un groupe témoin. Les participant·es ont passé une deuxième échographie deux heures plus tard, après avoir bu 12 onces liquides d’eau (environ 350 mL). RéSULTATS: Vingt personnes adultes se sont inscrites volontairement, soit un total de dix participant·es dans chaque groupe. En décubitus dorsal, 70 % des personnes du groupe sémaglutide et 10 % des personnes du groupe témoin présentaient des solides à l’échographie gastrique (risque relatif [RR], 3,50; intervalle de confiance [IC] à 95 %, 1,26 à 9,65; P = 0,02). En décubitus latéral, 90 % des personnes du groupe sémaglutide et 20 % des personnes du groupe témoin présentaient des solides à l’échographie gastrique (RR, 7,36; IC 95 %, 1,13 à 47,7; P = 0,005). Deux heures après avoir bu des liquides clairs, le contenu gastrique évalué ne différait pas entre les deux groupes en position latérale, mais en décubitus dorsal, l’estomac de 90 % des participant·es du groupe témoin a été jugé vide, comparativement à seulement 30 % chez les participant·es du groupe sémaglutide (P = 0,02). CONCLUSION: Cette étude procure des données préliminaires selon lesquelles les AR-GLP-1 pourraient affecter la vidange gastrique et le contenu gastrique résiduel après un jeûne d’une nuit et deux heures après l’ingestion de liquides clairs, ce qui pourrait avoir des implications quant au risque d’aspiration pendant les soins anesthésiques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号