Fracture

骨折
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在两年多的时间里,由9个专业学会组成的合作专家组精心制定了关于骨折超声检查的S2e指南。本出版物囊括了与特定适应症有关的基本见解。全面系统的文献检索,涵盖2000年至2021年3月期间,在PubMed进行,谷歌学者,和Cochrane系统评价数据库,辅之以对参考书目的评估。纳入标准包括随机对照临床试验,观察性临床试验,荟萃分析,和系统审查,而指导方针,会议,reviews,病例报告,专家意见被排除在外。SIGN评分系统(1999-2012)用于评估证据,并将结果SIGN表提交给专家组。经过详细讨论后,通过一致的共识得出了骨折超声检查应用的具体建议。在最初的520个文献来源中,细致的筛选和内容评估过程产生了182个来源(146项临床研究和36项荟萃分析和系统综述)用于评估.综合分析确定了21种适应症,这些适应症证实了骨折超声检查的明智使用。超声作为一种实用且用户友好的诊断方法,展示各种适应症的可行性。
    Over a span of more than two years, a collaborative expert group consisting of 9 professional societies has meticulously crafted the S2e guideline on fracture sonography. This publication encapsulates the essential insights pertaining to specific indications. A thorough and systematic literature search, covering the period from 2000 to March 2021, was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, complemented by an evaluation of bibliographies. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled clinical trials, observational clinical trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews, while guidelines, conferences, reviews, case reports, and expert opinions were excluded. The SIGN grading system (1999-2012) was applied to assess evidence, and resultant SIGN tables were presented to the expert group. Specific recommendations for the application of fracture sonography were then derived through unanimous consensus after detailed discussions. Out of the initial pool of 520 literature sources, a meticulous screening and content assessment process yielded 182 sources (146 clinical studies and 36 meta-analyses and systematic reviews) for evaluation. The comprehensive analysis identified twenty-one indications that substantiate the judicious use of fracture sonography. Ultrasound emerges as a pragmatic and user-friendly diagnostic method, showcasing feasibility across a diverse range of indications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    范可尼综合征(FS)可表现为低磷酸盐血症,肾性糖尿,低尿酸血症和氨基酸尿症。磷酸盐消耗是FS的最关键的临床方面,因为它导致骨软化症。一些患者出现与低磷血症性骨软化症(HO)相关的症状和体征。因此,这些患者出现这些症状并被误诊。通过对已发表文献的调查,发现HO症状是非特异性的,因此在各个中心被误诊。本研究描述了一名46岁的FS男性,该男性患有关节痛并首次被误诊。在他被转诊到提交人的医院后,对他的案件进行了评估,并考虑了评估结果,他被诊断为特发性FS伴多发性骨质疏松性骨折。此外,本研究进行了简短的文献回顾,还讨论了其他误诊的患者病例,这些患者的症状后来被发现是由于HO引起的。希望本研究可以提高医生对HO的认识,并可能有助于引起人们对出现非特异性症状的此类患者的注意。
    Fanconi syndrome (FS) can present with hypophosphatemia, renal glycosuria, hypouricemia and aminoaciduria. Phosphate depletion is the most critical clinical aspect of FS as it leads to osteomalacia. Some patients present with symptoms and signs related to hypophosphatemic osteomalacia (HO). Thus, these patients present with these symptoms and are misdiagnosed. From an investigation of the published literature, HO symptoms are found to be non-specific and were thus misdiagnosed in various centers. The present study describes the case of a a 46-year-old male with FS who suffered from joint pain and was first misdiagnosed. After he was referred to the authors\' hospital, his case was evaluated and following a consideration of the results of this evaluation, he was diagnosed with idiopathic FS with multiple osteoporotic fractures. Furthermore, the present study performs a brief literature review other cases of patients that were misdiagnosed and whose symptoms were later found to be due to HO are also discussed. It is hoped that the present study may increase the awareness of HO among physicians and may help to draw attention to such cases of patients presenting with non-specific symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着先进技术的结合,骨折的外科治疗取得了进展,外科技术,和再生疗法,但延迟骨愈合仍然是一个临床挑战,长骨骨不连的患病率在手术处理的骨折中占10%~15%.延迟的骨愈合源于机械的组合,生物,和作用于组织重塑部位的全身因素,并仔细考虑每个案件的伤害相关,依赖患者,外科,机械危险因素是骨愈合成功的关键。在这次审查中,我们描述了延迟骨愈合的生物学和生物力学,概述骨不连发展的已知风险因素,并介绍针对骨折不愈合的现代预防和矫正疗法。
    Surgical management of fractures has advanced with the incorporation of advanced technology, surgical techniques, and regenerative therapies, but delayed bone healing remains a clinical challenge and the prevalence of long bone nonunion ranges from 10 to 15% of surgically managed fractures. Delayed bone healing arises from a combination of mechanical, biological, and systemic factors acting on the site of tissue remodeling, and careful consideration of each case\'s injury-related, patient-dependent, surgical, and mechanical risk factors is key to successful bone union. In this review, we describe the biology and biomechanics of delayed bone healing, outline the known risk factors for nonunion development, and introduce modern preventative and corrective therapies targeting fracture nonunion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    下颌骨骨折常见于面部创伤。下颌骨髁突骨折(MCF)的治疗仍然是颌面部损伤中存在争议的问题。一些技术,从闭合复位(CR)到切开复位内固定(ORIF),可以有效地用于处理这些骨折。最好的治疗策略,也就是说,闭合复位或切开复位内固定,仍然有争议。
    本研究的目的是系统回顾现有的科学文献,以通过荟萃分析确定切开复位内固定还是闭合复位是髁突骨折患者的更好治疗选择。
    根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价。像PubMed这样的电子数据库,从2000年至2021年12月,我们对googlescholar和EbscoHost进行了搜索,研究报告了通过切开复位内固定与闭合复位治疗髁突骨折的方法,并以平均值和标准差(SD)报告了结果.纳入病例对照和队列研究的质量评估采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表,使用Cochrane偏倚风险(ROB)-2工具通过其领域评估了随机研究。使用RevMan软件版本5.3绘制偏差风险汇总图和偏差风险汇总适用性问题。采用标准化均差(SDM)作为汇总统计量,采用随机效应模型,p值<0.05有统计学意义。
    17项研究符合资格标准,并被纳入定性综合。其中只有9项研究适合进行荟萃分析。通过0.80、0.36和0.42的标准化平均差(SMD)得出的最大切面开口的汇总估计值,与ORIF相比,外侧弯曲和突出更有利于CR用于髁突骨折治疗。此外,大多数异质性测试结果很差,大多数漏斗图显示不对称,表明存在可能的发表偏倚。
    我们的荟萃分析结果表明,CR在最大切面开放方面提供了优异的结果,髁突骨折治疗中与ORIF相比,侧翻和突出。有必要进行更多的前瞻性随机研究并适当控制混杂因素,以取得有效的结果并逐步统一临床指南。
    UNASSIGNED: Mandibular fractures are frequent in facial trauma. Management of mandibular condylar fractures (MCF) remains an ongoing matter of controversy in maxillofacial injury. A number of techniques, from closed reduction (CR) to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), can be effectively used to manage these fractures. The best treatment strategy, that is, closed reduction or open reduction with internal fixation, remains controversial.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study is to systematically review the existing scientific literature to determine whether open reduction with internal fixation or closed reduction is a better treatment alternative for the patients with condylar fractures through a meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases like PubMed, google scholar and Ebsco Host were searched from 2000 to December 2021 for studies reporting management of condylar fractures through open reduction with internal fixation against closed reduction and reporting the outcome in terms of mean and standard deviation (SD). Quality assessment of included case control and cohort studies was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and randomized studies were evaluated using Cochrane risk-of-bias (ROB)-2 tool through its domains. The risk of bias summary graph and risk of bias summary applicability concern was plotted using RevMan software version 5.3. The standardized mean difference (SDM) was used as summary statistic measure with random effect model and p value <0.05 as statistically significant.
    UNASSIGNED: Seventeen studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in qualitative synthesis, of which only nine studies were suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled estimate through the Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) of 0.80, 0.36 and 0.42 for maximum inter incisal opening, laterotrusion and protrusion favours CR compared to ORIF for condylar fracture management. Also, most results of heterogeneity tests were poor and most of the funnel plots showed asymmetry, indicating the presence of possible publication bias.
    UNASSIGNED: The results of our meta-analysis suggest that CR provides superior outcomes in terms of maximum inter incisal opening, laterotrusion and protrusion compared to ORIF in condylar fractures management. It is necessary to conduct more prospective randomized studies and properly control confounding factors to achieve effective results and gradually unify clinical guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈椎骨折后颈椎固定的当前方案在老年人的急性康复中被广泛接受,然而,对其总体有效性仍缺乏共识。
    目的:总结有关颈椎骨折后可用颈椎固定方案的原始研究的信息并回答问题;哪些类型的研究设计已用于评估这些方案的有效性?目前报道的成人颈椎骨折后颈椎固定方案是什么?这些方案的有效性是什么?2月与这些方案相关的不良事件是什么?MEDLINE,CINAHL,中央。在数据库中搜索与颈椎骨折后使用项圈有关的文章。
    方法:颈椎骨折固定方案的有效性是主要结果,通过各种措施进行检查,包括工会率和残疾指数。
    方法:搜索了4个数据库;EMBASE,MEDLINE,护理和相关健康文献累积指数(CINAHL),和Cochrane中央对照试验注册中心(CENTRAL)于2023年2月23日开始,其中5,127项研究进行了研究,32项基于对成人(≥18岁)的研究进行了提取,诊断为颈椎骨折(C0-C7)通过刚性外部矫形器进行管理,以防止不稳定和手术(项圈,或颈胸矫形器)。使用JoannaBriggs研究所制定的指南评估偏倚风险。
    结果:这项范围审查产生了低水平的前瞻性(18%)和回顾性(69%)队列研究,病例对照研究(3%),和病例系列(6%)从1987年到2022年,患者年龄从14岁到104岁。由于缺乏随机对照试验,研究结果难以总结,导致没有关于标准化宫颈固定方案的明确结论,也没有关于治疗持续时间或护理过渡的信息。大多数纳入的文章是质量低到中等的回顾性队列研究,对干预问题有很大的偏见风险。这些方案的有效性尚不清楚,因为大多数研究评估了异质性结局,并且没有表现出组间差异。死亡率,肌肉骨骼(MSK)并发症,延迟手术是与使用颈领相关的常见不良事件.
    结论:这项范围审查强调了需要更高水平的证据,因为目前没有用于颈椎骨折的标准化固定方案作为主要治疗方法,宫颈固定方案的有效性尚不清楚,和死亡率,MSK并发症,延迟手术是常见的不良事件。本次范围审查没有使用任何资金来源。
    BACKGROUND: Current protocols on cervical immobilization postcervical spine fracture are widely accepted in the acute rehabilitation of older adults, however consensus on its overall effectiveness remains lacking.
    OBJECTIVE: Summarize information from original studies on available cervical immobilization protocols following a cervical fracture and to answer the questions; Which types of study designs have been used to assess the effectiveness of these protocols? What are the currently reported cervical immobilization protocols following cervical fracture in adults? What is the effectiveness of these protocols? What adverse events are associated with these protocols?
    METHODS: Scoping review was performed.
    METHODS: Searches were performed on the following online databases from inception to February 23, 2023: EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL. Databases were searched for articles pertaining to collar use post cervical spine fracture.
    METHODS: Effectiveness of the cervical fracture immobilization protocols was the primary outcome, examined by various measures including union rates and disability indexes.
    METHODS: 4 databases were searched; EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) beginning on February 23, 2023, where 5,127 studies were yielded and 32 were extracted based on studies of adults (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of a cervical fracture (C0-C7) managed with a rigid external orthosis to prevent instability and surgery (collar, or cervicothoracic orthosis). Risk of bias was assessed using the guidelines set out by the Joanna Briggs Institute.
    RESULTS: This scoping review yielded low-level prospective (18%) and retrospective (69%) cohort studies, case-control studies (3%), and case series (6%) from 1987 to 2022, patient age ranged from 14 to 104 years. Findings were difficult to summarize based on the lack of randomized controlled trials, leading to no clear conclusions drawn on the presence of standardized cervical immobilization protocols with no information on the duration of treatment or transition in care. Most included articles were retrospective cohort studies of poor to moderate quality, which have significant risk of bias for intervention questions. The effectiveness of these protocols remains unclear as most studies evaluated heterogeneous outcomes and did not present between-group differences. Mortality, musculoskeletal (MSK) complications, and delayed surgery were common adverse events associated with cervical collar use.
    CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review highlights the need for higher levels of evidence as there is currently no standardized immobilization protocol for cervical spine fractures as a primary treatment, the effectiveness of cervical immobilization protocols is unclear, and mortality, MSK complications, and delayed surgery are common adverse events. No sources of funding were used for this scoping review.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本综述旨在比较切开复位内固定(ORIF)与切除手术治疗上钩形骨折的术后疗效。
    对PubMed和EMBASE数据库(1954年至2023年)进行了系统评价,使用搜索词“钩骨骨折钩”,以确定所有关于使用ORIF或切除治疗钩骨骨折的出版物。结果包括重返体育运动,疼痛,尺神经功能障碍,屈肌腱功能障碍,联合汇率,手腕活动范围(ROM;对侧手的百分比),握力(对侧手的百分比),和手臂的快速残疾,肩膀,和手得分。
    包括705篇筛选的文章中的27篇。切除钩状钩(n=779)可缩短恢复运动时间(6比7.8周),术后疼痛发生率较低(6.1%vs33.3%),尺神经感觉功能障碍的发生率更高(4.2%vs0%),相对于ORIF(n=51),尺神经运动功能障碍的发生率更高(1.5%vs0%)。相对于非慢性损伤,慢性骨折恢复运动时间更长(7.2对5.7周)。
    两种手术方法均可获得可接受的效果。然而,基于可用数据的稀疏性,我们无法确定钩状切除术和ORIF之间的一致差异。
    据我们所知,目前尚未就鹰钩状骨折的最佳手术治疗达成共识。我们的研究结果强调需要使用标准化结果进行大型前瞻性队列研究,以提供强有力的证据,以证明手术切除或ORIF在治疗上钩形骨折中是否会产生更大的结果。
    UNASSIGNED: This review aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) versus excision in the surgical treatment of hook of hamate fractures.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases from 1954 to 2023 was performed using the search term \"hook of hamate fracture\" to identify all publications regarding the use of ORIF or excision in the treatment of hook of hamate fractures. Outcomes included a return to sport, pain, ulnar nerve dysfunction, flexor tendon dysfunction, union rate, wrist range of motion (ROM; % of contralateral hand), grip strength (% of contralateral hand), and quick disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand scores.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-seven of the 705 total screened articles were included. Excision of the hook of hamate (n = 779) resulted in a shorter return to sport time (6 vs 7.8 weeks), lower rates of postoperative pain (6.1% vs 33.3%), higher rates of ulnar nerve sensory dysfunction (4.2% vs 0%), and higher rates of ulnar nerve motor dysfunction (1.5% vs 0%) relative to ORIF (n = 51). Chronic fractures had a longer return to sport time (7.2 vs 5.7 weeks) relative to nonchronic injuries.
    UNASSIGNED: Both surgical procedures appear to yield acceptable outcomes in the treatment of hook of hamate fractures. However, based on the sparsity of available data, we are unable to determine a consistent difference between hook of hamate excision and ORIF.
    UNASSIGNED: To our knowledge, no current consensus on the optimal surgical treatment for hook of hamate fractures exists. Our findings emphasize the need for a large prospective cohort study using standardized outcomes to provide strong evidence as to whether surgical excision or ORIF yields greater outcomes in the treatment of hook of hamate fractures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已经证明了精神病药物与服用药物的人跌倒和骨折之间的关联,但哪种类别或药物导致跌倒或骨折的风险最大,应进一步调查。这项研究的目的是比较和排名由于不同的精神病药物引起的跌倒和骨折的风险大小。在8个数据库中进行了该荟萃分析,并使用基于频率的网络荟萃分析进行了评估。结果包括总共28篇论文,来自5个主要类别的14种药物,涉及3,467,314名患者。结果显示非典型抗精神病药是跌倒风险最高的一类药物,典型的抗精神病药物是导致骨折风险最高的一类药物。喹硫平在与跌倒风险相关的13种药物中排名第一,Z类药物在与骨折风险相关的6种药物中排名第一。现有证据表明,非典型抗精神病药和典型抗精神病药可能是跌倒和骨折风险最高的药物,分别。喹硫平可能是跌倒风险最高的药物,而Z类药物可能是骨折风险最高的药物。
    An association between psychiatric medications and falls and fractures in people taking them has been demonstrated, but which class or medication leads to the greatest risk of falls or fractures should be further investigated. The aim of this study was to compare and rank the magnitude of risk of falls and fractures due to different psychiatric medications. Eight databases were searched for this meta-analysis and evaluated using a frequency-based network meta-analysis. The results included a total of 28 papers with 14 medications from 5 major classes, involving 3,467,314 patients. The results showed that atypical antipsychotics were the class of medications with the highest risk of falls, and typical antipsychotics were the class of medications with the highest risk of resulting in fractures. Quetiapine ranked first in the category of 13 medications associated with risk of falls, and class Z drugs ranked first in the category of 6 medications associated with risk of fractures. The available evidence suggests that atypical antipsychotics and typical antipsychotics may be the drugs with the highest risk of falls and fractures, respectively. Quetiapine may be the medication with the highest risk of falls, and class Z drugs may be the medication with the highest risk of fractures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:支架已成为治疗犬气管塌陷的流行方法,但可能会出现并发症并对治疗结果产生负面影响.
    目的:确定犬气管支架置入并发症的总体患病率。
    方法:对2000年至2020年的出版物进行了书目检索。评估了狗气管支架置入后8种最常见并发症的证据质量和患病率(支架骨折,支架迁移,复发崩溃,肉芽肿形成,气管支气管感染,和早期,迟到,和临床相关的晚期咳嗽)。随机效应荟萃分析用于估计合并并发症的患病率。
    结果:15项研究符合纳入标准。咳嗽(早期:99%;95%置信区间[95%CI]:95%-100%,晚:75%;95%CI:63%-85%,和临床相关:52%;95%CI:42%-61%),气管支气管感染(24%;95%CI:14%-35%),气管支架置入后常见肉芽肿(20%;95%CI:11%-30%)。支架骨折(12%;95%CI:5%-20%),复发性塌陷(10%;95%CI:5%-15%),和支架迁移(5%;95%CI:1%-9%)频率较低。支架骨折的估计患病率在研究中发现了显著的异质性,肉芽肿,感染,迟来的咳嗽。
    结论:犬气管支架置入术与咳嗽的高风险以及气管支气管感染和肉芽肿形成的中等风险相关。因为大多数并发症会影响狗的生活质量,必须告知患者气管支架置入术是一种二线手术,不一定能减轻医疗和频繁随访的需要.需要进一步的研究来确定这些并发症的危险因素。
    BACKGROUND: Stenting has become popular to treat tracheal collapse in dogs, but complications might arise and negatively affect treatment outcome.
    OBJECTIVE: Determine the overall prevalence of complications of tracheal stenting in dogs.
    METHODS: A bibliographic search was performed of publications from 2000 to 2020. Studies were assessed for quality of evidence and measured prevalence of the 8 most commonly reported complications after tracheal stenting in dogs (stent fracture, stent migration, relapsing collapse, granuloma formation, tracheobronchial infections, and early, late, and clinically relevant late cough). Random effects meta-analyses were used to estimate pooled complications prevalence.
    RESULTS: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria. Cough (early: 99%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 95%-100%, late: 75%; 95% CI: 63%-85%, and clinically relevant: 52%; 95% CI: 42%-61%), tracheobronchial infections (24%; 95% CI: 14%-35%), and granulomas (20%; 95% CI: 11%-30%) were common after tracheal stenting. Stent fractures (12%; 95% CI: 5%-20%), relapsing collapse (10%; 95% CI: 5%-15%), and stent migration (5%; 95% CI: 1%-9%) were less frequent. Significant heterogeneity among studies was identified for the estimated prevalence of stent fracture, granulomas, infections, and late cough.
    CONCLUSIONS: Tracheal stenting in dogs is associated with a high risk of coughing and a moderate risk of tracheobronchial infections and granuloma formation. Because most complications will impact a dog\'s quality of life, owners must be informed that tracheal stenting is a second-line procedure that does not necessarily alleviate the need for medical treatment and frequent follow-up visits. Additional studies are warranted to identify the risk factors of these complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们研究的主要目的是调查西澳大利亚州一个三级手外科单位的骨折,特别是比较手术和非手术结果。
    确定了在2019年至2022年之间在我们的手单位患有甲和/或甲再五腕掌损伤的患者。所有患者都有手臂快速残疾,肩和手(QuickDASH)患者报告的结果测量记录治疗后。手术和非手术治疗的患者使用巴黎石膏和/或热塑性夹板进行夹板固定至少2周。所有患者均接受手治疗。
    本研究纳入了48例哈姆特和/或哈姆特加第五腕掌损伤的患者。13例患者有Milch1型骨折,35例Milch2型骨折。手术治疗了6例Milch1型骨折,七个人接受了非手术治疗。手术组的平均QuickDASH评分为0.38。非手术组的平均QuickDASH评分为0.65。对16例Milch2型骨折进行了手术治疗,19人接受了非手术治疗。手术组的平均QuickDASH评分为1.3。非手术组的平均QuickDASH评分为3.5。
    对于Milch2型骨折,手术组患者报告的结局指标优于非手术组.
    治疗IV。
    UNASSIGNED: The primary purpose of our study was to investigate hamate fractures at a single tertiary hand surgery unit in Western Australia, particularly comparing operative and nonsurgical outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with hamate and/or hamate plus fifth carpometacarpal injury at our hand unit between 2019 and 2022 were identified. All patients had Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) patient-reported outcome measures recorded post treatment. Patients managed operatively and nonsurgically had a period of splinting with plaster of Paris and/or thermoplastic splint for a minimum of 2 weeks. All patients underwent hand therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty-eight patients with hamate and/or hamate plus fifth carpometacarpal injury were included in this study. Thirteen patients had Milch type 1 fractures, and 35 had Milch type 2 fractures. Six Milch type 1 fractures were managed operatively, and seven were managed nonsurgically. The average QuickDASH score for the operative group was 0.38. The average QuickDASH score for the nonsurgical group was 0.65. Sixteen Milch type 2 fractures were managed operatively, and 19 were managed nonsurgically. The average QuickDASH score for the operative group was 1.3. The average QuickDASH score for the nonsurgical group was 3.5.
    UNASSIGNED: For Milch type 2 fractures, patient-reported outcome measures were better for the operative group compared with the nonsurgical group.
    UNASSIGNED: Therapeutic IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Az emlőrák – a fejlett országokhoz hasonlóan – hazánkban a nők leggyakoribb rosszindulatú daganata. A sikeres szűrőprogramoknak köszönhetően a felfedezett emlőrákok gyakorisága nő, miközben a szűrésből kiemelt preklinikai esetek nagyobb arányának és a korszerű sebészi és onkológiai terápiának köszönhetően a halálozás csökkenő tendenciát mutat. Az emlődaganatok közel kétharmada hormonreceptor-pozitív, humán epidermális növekedési faktor receptor-2 negatív, azaz jól reagál a hormoncsökkentő terápiára. Az endokrin terápiával kezelt emlőrákos betegeknél – mivel a betegség krónikus jellegűvé vált – számolnunk kell a terápia hosszú távú hatásaival is. A kezelés hatására a csontvesztés üteme felgyorsul, az ásványi csonttömeg csökken, ami a csonttörési kockázat növekedését is okozza. Ez külön jelentőséggel bír a már egyébként is postmenopausában lévő betegeknél, de a fiatal, mesterséges menopausát kiváltott esetében is figyelni kell rá. A jelen összefoglaló közleményben az elmúlt három évtized szakirodalmi adatainak áttekintésével szeretnénk ráirányítani a figyelmet a téma jelentőségére. Az időben elvégzett diagnosztikus lépések elengedhetetlenek a csontvesztés korai felismerése és a törésprevenciós kezelés bevezetése érdekében. Orv Hetil. 2024; 165(21): 813–821.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号