Drug treatment

药物治疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种致命的神经退行性疾病,影响第一和第二运动神经元(MNs),与肌肉无力有关,瘫痪,最后死亡。该疾病的确切病因仍不清楚。目前,正在努力开发针对特定病理机制的新型ALS治疗方法。ALS的发病机制涉及多种因素,例如蛋白质聚集,谷氨酸兴奋毒性,氧化应激,线粒体功能障碍,凋亡,炎症等不幸的是,到目前为止,只有两种FDA批准的ALS药物,利鲁唑和依达隆,没有治疗ALS。在这里,我们概述了许多途径,并回顾了神经保护性化合物的最新发现和临床前特征。同时,药物组合和其他治疗方法也进行了综述。在最后一部分,我们分析了临床失败的原因,并对未来ALS的治疗提出了看法。
    Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegenerative disease that affects the first and second motoneurons (MNs), associated with muscle weakness, paralysis and finally death. The exact etiology of the disease still remains unclear. Currently, efforts to develop novel ALS treatments which target specific pathomechanisms are being studied. The mechanisms of ALS pathogenesis involve multiple factors, such as protein aggregation, glutamate excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis, inflammation etc. Unfortunately, to date, there are only two FDA-approved drugs for ALS, riluzole and edavarone, without curative treatment for ALS. Herein, we give an overview of the many pathways and review the recent discovery and preclinical characterization of neuroprotective compounds. Meanwhile, drug combination and other therapeutic approaches are also reviewed. In the last part, we analyze the reasons of clinical failure and propose perspective on the treatment of ALS in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)是神经外科常见的出血性疾病。随着全球老龄化的加剧,其发病率逐渐增加。随着科学技术的进步,CSDH的病因学概念和外科治疗随着时间的推移不断发展。目前,神经科学家对CSDH的理解不再局限于桥接静脉破裂;探索各种机制,如血管生成,血管的成熟,炎症也在进行中。对致病机制的深入探索和发现指导临床治疗策略和方法的更新。对于不同类型的CSDH,现在有明确的指导有针对性地选择治疗方法。然而,CSDH目前的治疗不能完全解决所有问题,治疗方法的更新以及新的有效药物的开发和验证仍然是未来的挑战。此外,CSDH的复发是一个需要解决的重大问题。虽然我们已经回顾了可能相关的潜在复发因素,这个证据的力量是不够的。未来的研究应该逐渐集中在验证这些复发因素并探索新的因素上,以优化现有对CSDH的认识和处理。
    Chronic Subdural Hematoma (CSDH) is a common hemorrhagic disease in neurosurgery, and with the intensification of global aging, its incidence is gradually increasing. With the advancement of scientific technology, the etiological concepts and surgical treatments for CSDH have continually evolved over time. Currently, neuroscientists\' understanding of CSDH is no longer confined to bridging vein rupture; exploration of various mechanisms such as angiogenesis, maturation of blood vessels, and inflammation is also underway. In-depth exploration and discovery of pathogenic mechanisms guide the updating of clinical treatment strategies and methods. For different types of CSDH, there is now a clear guidance for the targeted selection of treatment methods. However, the current treatment of CSDH cannot completely solve all problems, and the updating of treatment methods as well as the development and validation of new effective drugs remain challenges for the future. In addition, the recurrence of CSDH is a significant issue that needs to be addressed. Although we have reviewed potential recurrent factors that may be associated, the strength of this evidence is insufficient. Future research should gradually focus on validating these recurrent factors and exploring new ones, in order to optimize the existing understanding and treatment of CSDH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对产前用药的惩罚性法律反应可能与意外的不良健康后果有关。然而,在快速变化的政策环境中,当前信息尚未汇总。我们对美国国家政策进行了调查,这些政策利用刑事或民事法律制度处罚来解决产前药物使用问题。然后,我们系统地确定了评估这些政策的实证研究,并总结了其潜在的公共卫生影响。
    方法:使用现有的数据库和原始的法定研究,我们调查了当前美国州级产前药物使用政策,授权明确定罪,非自愿承诺,民事虐待儿童的证据,和父母权利终止。接下来,我们系统地确定了这些政策与健康结果之间的数量关联,仅限于美国的同行评审研究,2000年1月至2022年12月发布。结果描述了研究特征,并综合了与惩罚性政策相关的健康相关危害和益处的证据。对有效性威胁进行了叙述描述。
    结果:到2022年,两个州通过了明确授权刑事起诉的政策,和五个州允许怀孕特定和药物使用相关的非自愿民事承诺。产前吸毒是22个州和5个州证实民事虐待儿童和终止父母权利的理由,分别。在16篇审查确定的文章中,通常,惩罚性政策之间评估最多的关联(k=12),或民事虐待儿童政策(k=2),和多个结果,包括药物治疗利用(k=6),虐待报告和寄养登记(k=5),新生儿戒断综合征(NDWS,k=4)以及其他与妊娠和分娩相关的结局(k=3)。大多数纳入研究报告了无效关联或建议采取惩罚性政策后不良结果增加。
    结论:将近一半的美国州采取了政策,对产前用药采取法律制度处罚。虽然需要更多的研究来澄清这种方法是否会导致公开的健康危害,目前的证据表明,惩罚性政策与公共卫生福利无关,因此构成无效的政策。
    BACKGROUND: Punitive legal responses to prenatal drug use may be associated with unintended adverse health consequences. However, in a rapidly shifting policy climate, current information has not been summarized. We conducted a survey of U.S. state policies that utilize criminal or civil legal system penalties to address prenatal drug use. We then systematically identified empirical studies evaluating these policies and summarized their potential public health impacts.
    METHODS: Using existing databases and original statutory research, we surveyed current U.S. state-level prenatal drug use policies authorizing explicit criminalization, involuntary commitment, civil child abuse substantiation, and parental rights termination. Next, we systematically identified quantitative associations between these policies and health outcomes, restricting to U.S.-based peer-reviewed research, published January 2000-December 2022. Results described study characteristics and synthesized the evidence on health-related harms and benefits associated with punitive policies. Validity threats were described narratively.
    RESULTS: By 2022, two states had adopted policies explicitly authorizing criminal prosecution, and five states allowed pregnancy-specific and drug use-related involuntary civil commitment. Prenatal drug use was grounds for substantiating civil child abuse and terminating parental rights in 22 and five states, respectively. Of the 16 review-identified articles, most evaluated associations between punitive policies generally (k = 12), or civil child abuse policies specifically (k = 2), and multiple outcomes, including drug treatment utilization (k = 6), maltreatment reporting and foster care entry (k = 5), neonatal drug withdrawal syndrome (NDWS, k = 4) and other pregnancy and birth-related outcomes (k = 3). Most included studies reported null associations or suggested increases in adverse outcome following punitive policy adoption.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nearly half of U.S. states have adopted policies that respond to prenatal drug use with legal system penalties. While additional research is needed to clarify whether such approaches engender overt health harms, current evidence indicates that punitive policies are not associated with public health benefits, and therefore constitute ineffective policy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    Tweetableabstract更新具有最高水平的药物基因组学知识库证据,证明它们与毒性和功效有关,以应对最常用的疾病缓解抗风湿药物治疗类风湿关节炎。
    Tweetable abstract Update on the genetic variants with the highest level of Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base evidence for their association with toxicity and efficacy in response to the most commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐药结核病的出现和持续存在是对全球公共卫生的主要威胁。我们的目的是评估全基因组测序(WGS)检测耐药基因组标记的适用性,并探讨其与耐多药/广泛耐药结核病(MDR/XDR-TB)治疗结果的关系。
    方法:从2000年开始,搜索了五个电子数据库以英文发表的研究。两名审稿人独立进行了文章筛选,相关数据提取,和质量评估。纳入研究的数据采用叙述方法进行综合,并以表格形式呈现。
    结果:数据库搜索确定了949篇已发表的文章和8项研究。据报道,26.6%(488/1834)的结核病病例出现了不利的治疗结果,介于9.7至51.3%之间。死亡报告占总病例的10.5%(194/1834)。高水平的氟喹诺酮耐药(由于gyrA94AAC和94GGC突变)与不良治疗结果的原因相关,并在三项研究中报道。其他耐药突变,像卡那霉素高水平抗性突变(rrs1401G),rpoBIle491Phe,和ethA突变,还报道了赋予硫脲耐药性的方法。本系统综述的次要发现涉及WGS的实验室方面,包括与表型DST的相关性,成本,和周转时间,或WGS结果对公共卫生行动的影响,例如确定疫情中的传播事件。
    结论:WGS有能力为MDR/XDR-TB提供准确和全面的耐药性数据,这可以告知个性化药物治疗以优化治疗结果。
    The emergence and persistence of drug-resistant tuberculosis is a major threat to global public health. Our objective was to assess the applicability of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to detect genomic markers of drug resistance and explore their association with treatment outcomes for multidrug-resistant/extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/XDR-TB).
    METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched for studies published in English from the year 2000 onward. Two reviewers independently conducted the article screening, relevant data extraction, and quality assessment. The data of the included studies were synthesized with a narrative method and are presented in a tabular format.
    RESULTS: The database search identified 949 published articles and 8 studies were included. An unfavorable treatment outcome was reported for 26.6% (488/1834) of TB cases, which ranged from 9.7 to 51.3%. Death was reported in 10.5% (194/1834) of total cases. High-level fluoroquinolone resistance (due to gyrA 94AAC and 94GGC mutations) was correlated as the cause of unfavorable treatment outcomes and reported in three studies. Other drug resistance mutations, like kanamycin high-level resistance mutations (rrs 1401G), rpoB Ile491Phe, and ethA mutations, conferring prothionamide resistance were also reported. The secondary findings from this systematic review involved laboratory aspects of WGS, including correlations with phenotypic DST, cost, and turnaround time, or the impact of WGS results on public health actions, such as determining transmission events within outbreaks.
    CONCLUSIONS: WGS has a significant capacity to provide accurate and comprehensive drug resistance data for MDR/XDR-TB, which can inform personalized drug therapy to optimize treatment outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    未经批准:扩大获得治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)的药物,比如丁丙诺啡,是对日益严重的药物过量危机的基于证据的反应。然而,对丁丙诺啡转移的担忧持续存在,并导致进入有限。
    UNASSIGNED:要告知有关扩展访问权限的决定,对描述范围的出版物进行了范围审查,动机,以及与美国丁丙诺啡转用相关的结局
    未经评估:在纳入的57项研究中,转移的定义不一致。大多数研究使用非法获得的丁丙诺啡。在整个研究中,丁丙诺啡分流范围从0%到100%,因样本类型和召回期而异。在接受丁丙诺啡治疗的人群样本中,分流达到4.8%的峰值。使用改用丁丙诺啡的动机是自我治疗,药物使用管理,为了变得很高,当选择的药物不可用时。检查的相关结果倾向于积极或中性,包括改善对MOUD的态度和保留。
    未经授权:尽管转移的定义不一致,研究报告说,接受MOUD的人的转移范围很低,无法获得治疗作为使用改用丁丙诺啡的激励因素,以及与使用改用丁丙诺啡相关的结果在MOUD中的保留增加。未来的研究应在扩大治疗可用性的背景下探讨使用丁丙诺啡的原因,以解决OUD循证治疗的持续障碍。
    Expanding access to medications to treat opioid use disorder (OUD), such as buprenorphine, is an evidence-based response to the mounting drug overdose crisis. However, concerns about buprenorphine diversion persist and contribute to limited access.
    To inform decisions about expanding access, a scoping review was conducted on publications describing the scope of, motivations for, and outcomes associated with diverted buprenorphine in the U.S.
    In the 57 included studies, definitions for diversion were inconsistent. Most studied use of illicitly-obtained buprenorphine. Across studies, the scope of buprenorphine diversion ranged from 0% to 100%, varying by sample type and recall period. Among samples of people receiving buprenorphine for OUD treatment, diversion peaked at 4.8%. Motivations for using diverted buprenorphine were self-treatment, management of drug use, to get high, and when drug of choice was unavailable. Associated outcomes examined trended toward positive or neutral, including improved attitudes toward and retention in MOUD.
    Despite inconsistent definitions of diversion, studies reported a low scope of diversion among people receiving MOUD, with inability to access treatment as a motivating factor for using diverted buprenorphine, and increased retention in MOUD as an outcome associated with use of diverted buprenorphine. Future research should explore reasons for diverted buprenorphine use in the context of expanded treatment availability to address persistent barriers to evidence-based treatment for OUD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    UNASSIGNED:系统评估暴露和反应预防(ERP)联合药物治疗强迫症(OCD)的有效性。
    未经授权:PubMed,WebofScience,EBSCO,科克伦,Embase,搜索和ScienceDirect数据库,包括符合标准的ERP与强迫症药物联合治疗的随机对照试验.耶鲁布朗强迫症量表被用作主要结果指标,抑郁量表作为次要结局指标。对偏倚风险进行评估,以根据方法学和临床因素确定可能的偏倚来源。使用ReviewManager5.3和Stata16.0软件对提取的数据进行荟萃分析。
    UNASSIGNED:共纳入21项研究,共1113例患者。Meta分析显示,ERP联合药物治疗明显优于单纯药物治疗,包括选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂,氯米帕明和利培酮(MD=-6.60,95%CI:-8.35至-4.84,P<0.00001),但D-环丝氨酸(DCS)药物对OCD患者的ERP干预效果没有增强(MD=0.15,95%CI:-0.87至1.17,P=0.77)。在随访期间,药物加ERP的联合治疗方法比单独药物治疗更明显(MD=-7.14,95%CI:-9.17至-5.10,P<0.00001)。DCS药物未增强ERP干预对OCD患者抑郁的影响(SMD=-0.08,95%CI:-0.31至0.15,P=0.50)。ERP联合药物改善患者的抑郁水平明显优于单独提供药物(SMD=-0.40,95%CI:-0.68至-0.11,P=0.006)。
    UNASSIGNED:强迫症患者在ERP与药物合用时,强迫症和抑郁症的症状有显著改善,然而,不足以证明DCS可以提高ERP的有效性。
    UNASSIGNED: To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of exposure and response prevention (ERP) combined with medication on obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).
    UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane, Embase, and Science Direct databases were searched to include randomized controlled trials of ERP combined with medication for OCD that met the criteria. The Yale Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale was used as the primary outcome indicator, and Depression scales were used as secondary outcome indicators. An evaluation of bias risk was conducted to identify possible sources of bias based on methodological and clinical factors. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 16.0 software was used to perform meta-analysis of the extracted data.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 21 studies with 1113 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that ERP combined with medication therapy was significantly better than medication therapy alone including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, clomipramine and risperidone (MD = -6.60, 95% CI: -8.35 to -4.84, P < 0.00001), but D-cycloserine (DCS) drugs do not enhance the effect of ERP intervention in patients with OCD (MD = 0.15, 95% CI: -0.87 to 1.17, P = 0.77). There is more significant maintenance by combined treatment method of medication plus ERP than medication treatment alone during the follow-up period (MD = -7.14, 95% CI: -9.17 to -5.10, P < 0.00001). DCS drugs did not enhance the effect of ERP intervention on depression in patients with OCD (SMD = -0.08, 95% CI: -0.31 to 0.15, P = 0.50). ERP combined with drug improved patients\' depression levels significantly better than providing drug alone (SMD = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.68 to -0.11, P = 0.006).
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with OCD have significant improvement in symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression when ERP is combined with medication, however, not enough to prove that DCS can enhance ERP effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:岩炎是一种与中耳炎相关的罕见且致命的并发症。它很可能是由细菌感染引起的,但在某些情况下,它是由真菌感染引起的。
    方法:本报告中的病例与真菌性岩炎有关。临床症状是:慢性中耳炎引起的耳痛,严重头痛,周围性面神经麻痹和复视。该病例最终通过中耳成像得到证实,细菌培养,病理学,和血液宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)测试。患者接受敏感抗真菌药物治疗。
    结论:在这种情况下,药物治疗是保守但有效的方法。mNGS可以提供致病参考,当抗生素对真菌感染或耐药真菌感染病例不够有效时。这使我们能够调整治疗药物的使用。
    BACKGROUND: Petrositis is a rare and fatal complication associated with otitis media. It is most likely caused by bacterial infections, but in some cases it is caused by fungal infections.
    METHODS: The case in this report is associated with fungal petrositis. The clinical symptoms are: ear pain from chronic otitis media, severe headache, peripheral facial palsy and diplopia. The case was finally confirmed through imaging of middle ear, bacterial culture, pathology, and blood Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) test. The patient was treated with sensitive antifungal drugs.
    CONCLUSIONS: Drug treatment is conservative but efficient method in this case. mNGS can provide pathogenic reference, when antibiotic is not efficient enough for fungal infections or drug-resistant fungal infections cases. This allows we to adjust drug use for the treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管强迫性人格障碍(OCPD)是最普遍的人格障碍之一,它是研究最少的。关于药物治疗对OCPD是否有效存在争议。我们旨在系统评估OCPD药物治疗的疗效和耐受性。
    这项系统评价发现了两项研究OCPD药物治疗的随机对照试验。在一项关于重度抑郁症(n=308)与OCPD共病(n=71)的研究中,西酞普兰对OCPD的疗效优于舍曲林,且退出治疗的次数较少.在一项关于OCPD的小型研究中(n=24),氟伏沙明比安慰剂更有效,辍学率很低。这些研究的偏倚风险和质量评估是不可能的,研究结果的确定性非常低。
    两项研究提供了支持西酞普兰和氟伏沙明用于OCPD的初步证据。在得出有关OCPD药物治疗疗效的确切结论之前,还需要进一步的随机对照试验。
    UNASSIGNED: Although obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) is one of the most prevalent personality disorders, it is one of the least studied. There is debate as to whether pharmacotherapy is efficacious for OCPD. We aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of pharmacotherapy for OCPD.
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic review found two randomized controlled trials investigating pharmacotherapy of OCPD. In a study of major depression (n = 308) with comorbid OCPD (n = 71), citalopram was more effective for OCPD than sertraline with fewer drop-outs from treatment. In a small study of OCPD (n = 24), fluvoxamine was more effective than placebo, and there was a low drop-out rate. Risk of bias and quality assessment of these studies was not possible, and findings have very low levels of certainty.
    UNASSIGNED: Two studies provide preliminary evidence in support of citalopram and fluvoxamine for OCPD. Further randomized controlled trials are required before firm conclusions can be drawn regarding efficacy of pharmacotherapy for OCPD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抑郁症状是帕金森病(PD)的主要非运动症状。抑郁症PD(dPD)的药物治疗可以减轻患者的症状。然而,结果不一致,需要进一步分析。这篇系统的网络荟萃分析综述旨在评估dPD的药物治疗。我们包括双盲,在dPD中比较抗抑郁药与安慰剂或其他抗抑郁药的随机对照试验。我们对疗效进行了传统的成对分析和网络荟萃分析,可接受性,抑郁评分,和不利影响。累积排序曲线下的表面是评估登记的代理的排序概率。我们登记了62项研究,包括12353个科目,分析这些估计。对于传统的成对荟萃分析,与安慰剂相比,观察到多巴胺激动剂(DOP;OR=2.20[95%CI,1.46~3.33])和选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI;OR=2.30[95%CI,1.15~4.60])可提高疗效.对于网络荟萃分析,与安慰剂相比,观察到DOP提高了疗效(OR=-0.84[95%CI,-1.20至-0.48])。直接和间接证据都表明,几种治疗方法,例如,DOP,单胺氧化酶抑制剂,5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂,SSRI,和三环抗抑郁药,抑郁症状明显改善。DOP和SSRI在dPD中具有良好的疗效,并显着改善了症状,但需要密切关注这些药物的不良反应.
    Depressive symptom is the prevailing non-motor symptom of Parkinson\'s disease (PD). Drug treatments for depressed PD (dPD) can mitigate the symptoms of patients. However, the results are discordant and need further analysis. This systematic review with network meta-analysis aims to evaluate the drug treatments for dPD. We included double-blind, randomized controlled trials to compare antidepressants with placebo or other antidepressants in dPD. We performed traditional pairwise analysis and network meta-analysis concerning the efficacy, acceptability, depression score, and adverse effect. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve was to assess the ranking probabilities of the enrolled agents. We enrolled 62 studies, including 12,353 subjects, to analyze these estimates. For the traditional pairwise meta-analysis, dopamine agonist (DOP; OR = 2.20 [95% CI, 1.46 to 3.33]) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI; OR = 2.30 [95% CI, 1.15 to 4.60]) were observed to improve the efficacy compared with placebo. For network meta-analysis, DOP was observed to improve the efficacy compared with placebo (OR = -0.84 [95% CI, -1.20 to -0.48]). Both direct and indirect evidence showed that several treatments, e.g., DOP, monoamine-oxidase inhibitor, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, SSRI, and tricyclic antidepressants, significantly improved depressive symptoms. DOP and SSRI had good efficacy and improved symptoms considerably in dPD, but the adverse effect of these agents was needed to follow closely.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号