UNASSIGNED: To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of Endoflas and Zinc Oxide Eugenol (ZOE) as root canal filling materials (RCFMs) for the pulpectomy of deciduous teeth by analyzing multiple clinical and radiographic success and failure follow-ups in previously published studies.
UNASSIGNED: All clinical studies that investigated the pulpectomy of the deciduous teeth of children aged 3-9 years.
UNASSIGNED: The databases used for source identification included MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. No limitations were imposed on the publication year or language. The selection of studies and extraction of relevant study characteristics were conducted from December 26, 2021, to September 7, 2023. Additionally, the risk of bias (RoB) in the included studies was evaluated by using a RoB instrument (RoB 2). Eligible studies were then combined, and a random-effects model was applied by using the maximum likelihood estimations of log risk ratios and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 3913 records found in the abovementioned databases, nine were eligible for systematic review and eight were eligible for meta-analysis. The studies included 628 pulpectomies of deciduous molar teeth in children. The overall results showed that compared with Endoflas, ZOE was associated with a higher risk ratio for clinical evaluation (LOG[RR] = 0.06, CI 0.03-0.09, p-value 0.001) and radiographic evaluation (LOG[RR] = 0.68, CI 0.35-1.00, p-value 0.001). This association was highly significant at 6- and 9-month follow-ups.
UNASSIGNED: Compared with ZOE, Endoflas was associated with a lower risk of the clinical and radiographic failure of deciduous teeth pulpectomy and a 6%-6.8% higher risk ratio, especially at 6- and 9-month follow-ups.
UNASSIGNED: This study suggests the superiority of Endoflas over ZOE as an RCFM for deciduous teeth.

Dental caries in children is a frequent and debilitating condition, whose management is often challenging. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effectiveness of ozone applications for the treatment of caries in primary dentition. According to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was performed up to 6 January 2024. Clinical studies using ozone to treat caries of deciduous teeth were considered for inclusion. Out of the 215 records retrieved, seven studies were eventually included in the review, all of which used gaseous ozone. Four studies were judged at high risk of bias, two at low risk, and one of some concerns. The great heterogeneity of designs, outcomes, and protocols made it impossible to conduct a meta-analysis. Despite some limitations, the evidence yielded by the included studies suggests that ozone application, regardless of the protocol applied, is comparable to other interventions in terms of clinical outcomes and anti-bacterial activity, with no reported adverse effects and good patient acceptance. Therefore, ozone application may be a non-invasive approach to treat caries in primary dentition, especially in very young and poorly cooperative patients. Further standardized and rigorous studies are, however, needed to identify the best clinical protocols for this specific field.

OBJECTIVE: In children, the use of stainless steel crowns to treat caries has a high success rate. However, due to the unnatural color of stainless steel crowns, it still needs to modify crown types. The present meta-analysis study aims to explore the previous articles on the comparison of stainless steel crowns and zirconia crowns.
METHODS: The systematic search of studies on the comparison of zirconia crowns and stainless steel crowns for primary teeth was mainly in PubMed and Cochrane database. The standardized mean differences (SMDs) of gingival health between zirconia crowns and stainless steel crowns comprised the primary outcome, and the SMDs of plaque index compared two crown treatments was treated as the secondary outcome.
RESULTS: The meta-analysis extracted 187 papers from various databases and collected five randomized controlled trials, four comparisons on deciduous molars and one comparison on deciduous incisors. 160 children were included, ranging in age from 3-9 years old. The quantitative analysis showed a significantly lower gingival index of zirconia crowns in the primary molar group and the primary incisor group. The plaque index between two crown treatments groups was -4.51, indicating less accumulation of plaque on zirconia crown. However, the heterogeneity of included trials still need to be considered.
CONCLUSIONS: Zirconia crowns for deciduous teeth had its advantages for gingival health. Although stainless steel crowns were more likely to have plaque deposition and gingival inflammation, zirconia crowns relatively caused the opposite tooth wearing and chipping. Therefore, the comprehensive consideration is important to choose deciduous tooth crown.

UNASSIGNED: In this COVID era, it\'s critical to promote nonaerosol procedures. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) is one of them, and it\'s particularly effective in children for lowering anxiety, enhancing dental health, and giving restorative care.
UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to assess the survival rate of ART compared with conventional treatment procedures in primary dentition.
UNASSIGNED: The review was done in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis statement and is been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021213729). The studies included comprised clinical investigations with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the survival rate of ART and conventional restorative treatments using the same or different restorative materials to treat carious lesion. RCTs in which ART was compared with conventional treatment on patients in the age group of 6-10 years with minimum follow-up of 6 months. Studies available as open access and free full text in PubMed, DOAJ, and Google Scholar databases, and published in English Language only were included in the study. Cochrane\'s collaboration tool for RCTs was used for the assessment of risk of bias.
UNASSIGNED: The survival rate of single surface and multiple surface in primary dentition treated according to the ART compared with conventional treatment was found to be similar.
UNASSIGNED: The ART approach is equally helpful in managing dental caries in children and this method may be considered a useful intervention in clinical practice to enhance the dental health of children.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of root canal filling of primary teeth using lentulospiral in comparison with other instruments.
METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, TRIP, LILACS, and CENTRAL Cochrane) were searched up to Jan 2021. Clinical trials that compared the quality of root canal filling of endodontically treated primary teeth using lentulospiral with other instruments were included. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Two outcomes were considered: inadequate root canal filling (under or overfilling) and presence of voids. Conventional meta-analyses were performed using a fixed-effects model. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan5.3 at a significance level of 5%.
RESULTS: Of the 68 potentially relevant studies, eight were selected for full-text analysis, and three were included in the systematic review. The use of syringes resulted in a lower risk of presence of voids in the root canal filling compared to the use of lentulospiral (RR: 0.62 95% CI 0.45; 0.85). However, there was no difference between lentulospiral and bi-directional spiral (RR:1.17 95% CI: 0.90; 1.51). There was no significant difference between lentulospiral and syringes (RR: 1.37 95% CI 1.00; 1.87) considering the length of the root canal filling. The use of bi-directional spiral had a higher risk of inadequate root canal filling compared to the use of lentulospiral (RR: 1.75 95% CI: 1.12; 2.74). Two studies were at \"high\", and one study at \"unclear\" risk of bias in the key domains.
CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient scientific evidence showing the superiority of using lentulospiral for the root canal filling in endodontically treated primary teeth. Due to the limited level of evidence, professionals may opt to choose the instrument based on their preferences.

The objective of this review was to investigate rates of caries lesion progression, arrest, and regression in approximal surfaces of deciduous teeth following secondary preventive interventions in order to inform caries management protocols. Studies published in English and other languages from 1960 till February 2017 were searched in electronic databases. Inclusion criteria were: randomized controlled clinical trials and longitudinal studies that involved non-invasive preventive treatment. We excluded: in vivo studies and incidence studies. 805 potential articles were located, of 38 full text reviews, 10 were included. Two types of studies were found; those reporting the mean percentage of lesion progression as progression estimate and those reporting the survival rate of lesions presented as the mean or median survival time in months as survival estimate. Weak evidence suggests it would appear that the most effective secondary preventive intervention was one involving a combination of silver fluoride and stannous fluoride, but this has not been substantiated. To inform treatment protocols better, it is recommended (i) that new well-designed RCTs are conducted to test the effectiveness of different forms of fluoride to arrest lesion progression in deciduous teeth and (ii) to continue ongoing research into the caries preventive effects of approximal surface sealants.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the association between developmental defects of enamel and dental caries in the primary dentition.
METHODS: Electronic searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Scopus and Scielo for the identification of relevant studies.
METHODS: Observational studies that examined the association between developmental defects of enamel and dental caries in the deciduous dentition were included. Additionally, meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis were employed to synthesize the available evidence. Multivariable meta-regression analysis was performed to explore heterogeneity among studies.
METHODS: A total of 318 articles were identified in the electronic searches. Of those, 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled estimates revealed that children with developmental defects of enamel had higher odds of having dental caries (OR 3.32; 95%CI 2.41-4.57), with high heterogeneity between studies (I2 80%). Methodological characteristic of the studies, such as where it was conducted, the examined teeth and the quality of the study explained about 30% of the variability. Concerning type of defect, children with hypoplasia and diffuse opacities had higher odds of having dental caries (OR 4.28; 95%CI 2.24-8.15; OR1.42; 95%CI 1.15-1.76, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates a clear association between developmental defects of enamel and dental caries in the primary dentition.