Corneal melt and perforation can arise from various etiologies, including the use of toxic topical drops, particularly topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The literature has frequently documented the association between the use of topical NSAIDs and the subsequent development of corneal ulcers. More recently, reports have emerged linking the use of oral NSAIDs and colchicine to impaired corneal wound healing and corneal perforation. This case report presents an instance of corneal melting and subsequent perforation in a medically unburdened patient who had been self-administering oral NSAIDs for one year. The evidence presented in this report suggests a plausible association between the prolonged administration of oral NSAIDs and corneal melt. Consequently, healthcare practitioners should be mindful of this potential risk when considering the prolonged use of oral NSAIDs.

This case report presents the clinical course of a 53-year-old male farmer with nephrotic syndrome, specifically focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, who developed a fulminant eye infection. While receiving maintenance hemodialysis and immunosuppressive therapy, the patient presented with sudden onset redness, discharge, and decreased vision in his right eye. Initial management with topical antibiotics and steroids failed to halt the progression of the infection, leading to corneal perforation and iris prolapse within a few days. Despite the discontinuation of immunosuppressive medications and initiation of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, the patient\'s compromised renal function and anaemia precluded surgical intervention. This case underscores the challenges in managing severe ocular infections in immunocompromised patients. It highlights the importance of early recognition, aggressive antimicrobial therapy, and close ophthalmologic monitoring in preventing sight-threatening complications. Despite intensive management, the prognosis for visual recovery in such cases may be poor, emphasizing the need for preventive strategies and careful surveillance in high-risk patient populations.

BACKGROUND: To report a case of interface fluid syndrome (IFS) following traumatic corneal perforation repair after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
METHODS: A 23-year-old woman, with a past history of SMILE, was struck in the left eye with a barbecue prod and subsequently underwent corneal perforation repair at local hospital. Primary wound repaired with a single 10 - 0 nylon suture at the area of leakage. After the surgery, her best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/30. Four days later, she presented at our hospital with blurred vision, and interface fluid syndrome (IFS) was diagnosed. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) was used to guide the resuturing of the corneal perforation in the left eye, followed by anterior chamber gas injection. At the first postoperative month, the BCVA was 20/25. The corneal cap adhered closely to the stroma, the surface became smooth.
CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates that any corneal perforation following lamellar surgery, including SMILE, may lead to IFS. It is crucial to consider the depth of corneal perforation, and intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) plays a unique role in the repair procedure.

OBJECTIVE: To present three cases of serious corneal complications after seemingly minor and uncomplicated eyelid surgery.
METHODS: These cases emphasize the real-world risk of corneal damage after oculoplastic surgery.
RESULTS: The first case is a 46-year-old man referred to our department with a corneal perforation after bilateral blepharoplasty of both upper and lower eyelids. The second case concerns a 51-year-old woman who suffered an accidental coagulation of the cornea during the removal of upper eyelid papillomas, and the third case is a 55-year-old woman who had severe corneal thinning accompanied by visual loss after an upper lid blepharoplasty. All patients were stabilized without the need for corneal transplantation, although there were significant corneal scars and sequelae.
CONCLUSIONS: Although complications after esthetic oculoplastic surgery are rare, the reported cases show that corneal damage can have a major impact on the patient\'s vision and quality of life. Strategies such as the use of a corneal shield can be used to mitigate these risks, but their use is debated. Nevertheless, diligent postoperative care is paramount. At the first postoperative visit, a basic visual acuity measurement should be performed. In cases where reduced vision is reported, particularly when accompanied by pain, patients should be urgently referred for specialized eye care.

BACKGROUND: Pterygium is a common ocular surface disease. Pterygium combined with corneal perforation is rare.
METHODS: A 28-year-old female patient visited our outpatient clinic due to sudden onset of blurred vision and increased tearing in her left eye. The visual acuity was 1.0 OD and intraocular pressure (IOP) of 19.5 mmHg for the right eye with no significant abnormalities found in the anterior and posterior segments. The visual acuity of her left eye was 0.06, and IOP was 6.2 mmHg. A triangular vascular membranous tissue was seen in her left eye below the nose growing into the cornea and the pupil area was not touched. Slit-lamp examination revealed a tiny round corneal perforation in 8 o\'clock position of the lesion area. Hospital diagnosis was given as pterygium combined with corneal perforation. The patient was treated with levofloxacin eye drops and autologous serum-based eye drops.
CONCLUSIONS: We report a rare case of pterygium combined with corneal perforation. Perforation is a very rare complication of pterygium. This patient received proper treatment and good result was seen. This article aimed to improve clinicians\' understanding of pterygium.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Corneal perforation is an ophthalmic emergency. The conventional management of corneal perforation can be associated with severe complications especially in patients with ocular surface disease. Endothelial keratoplasty has been suggested as an alternative surgical technique for the management of corneal perforations. We present a case series of nine patients with corneal perforation and ocular surface disease managed with secondary patch endothelial keratoplasty.
METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of nine patch endothelial keratoplasties performed between 2016 and 2022 at a quaternary eye hospital in Australia. The surgical technique is similar to conventional endothelial keratoplasty except descemetorhexis was not performed.
RESULTS: A total of 9 cases were treated during the review period. Eight of the nine cases had an improvement in visual acuity. One case failed to achieve corneal tectonic objective.
CONCLUSIONS: Patch endothelial keratoplasty is a safe secondary procedure for the management of corneal perforations in patients with ocular surface disease.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report the success and long-term outcomes of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive (CTA) application in the management of corneal perforation disorders.
METHODS: This retrospective case series describes the profile and outcomes of eyes that underwent CTA for corneal perforation over an 11-year period from January 2009 until January 2020 at a tertiary eye centre in the United Kingdom.
RESULTS: In total, 25 eyes underwent CTA application during the study period. Non-traumatic sterile corneal melt was responsible in more than half of the cases (56.0%; n = 14) followed by infection (32.0%; n = 8) and trauma (12.0%; n = 3). Median size of perforation was 2.0 mm (interquartile range, IQR 1.0-3.0). The most common anatomical location of corneal perforation was central (56.0%; n = 14). Ocular surface disease was seen in almost all eyes except two (92.0%; n = 23) with dry eye disease being the most common (48.0%; n = 12). Amongst 23 eyes that completed follow-up (median 27 months; IQR 9.5-46.5), single CTA application was successful in achieving intact globe in 13 (56.5%) eyes and repeat gluing sealed total of 20 (86.9%) eyes. Survival analysis showed cumulative success of 71.0% and 51.2% at 90 and 250 days, respectively. The CTA was retained in the eyes for median of 94.0 days (IQR 30.0-140.5). A total of five patients developed adverse events, including endophthalmitis (n = 2), following CTA application.
CONCLUSIONS: CTA was highly effective in sealing corneal perforations in acute setting and showed moderate long-term success. However, multiple applications are often required.

We report a case of a patient with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and perforated keratomalacia secondary to vitamin A deficiency. A 6-year-old boy complained of difficulty in opening the eyelids. The ocular conjunctiva was hyperemic and keratinized with purulent ocular (eye) discharge. Both corneas showed epithelial defects with hypopyon. The serum vitamin A level was ≤5 IU/dL (normal 97-316), leading to a diagnosis of xerophthalmia and keratomalacia due to vitamin A deficiency. Intramuscular injection of vitamin A (50,000 IU/day), as well as oral administration of multivitamin (containing 2,500 IU of vitamin A) and zinc supplement at 50 mg/day, allowed him to open both eyes and show interest in tablet devices 14 days after the diagnosis. During the course of the treatment, corneal perforation was observed, but it was closed without contact lens wear or amniotic patch and managed with vitamin A replacement therapy and antimicrobial eye drops. The epithelium extended to the area of the right cornea that had been melted, and although scarring corneal opacity remained, there were no obvious signs of infection. Early diagnosis is difficult because children with ASD do not express complaints, and vitamin A deficiency should be considered in patients with a severely unbalanced diet and complaints of difficulty opening the eyelids.

Purpose: To present the case of a patient with a history of trauma and corneal foreign body in the right eye, followed by decreased visual acuity in the right eye, corneal perforation with good recovery after surgical treatment. Material and method: We report a case of a patient who presented to our clinic with a sudden decrease of visual acuity in the right eye, two months after an incident resulting in a corneal foreign body in the right eye. In the case presented, the patient applied a local medical self-treatment, an antibiotic and a topical corticosteroid. After a few weeks, the patient presented to the ophthalmologist, a foreign body was extracted from the cornea of the right eye and a topical treatment with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, a cycloplegic and an antibiotic were indicated. However, corneal perforation occurred and the patient was urgently sent to our service, where a corneal anaesthesia was also found. Results: Corneal perforation healed with a minor paracentral opacification. Discussions: Corneal perforation in our patient was due to corneal melting because of topical steroid anti-inflammatory autotherapy, late corneal foreign body extraction and topical treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Corneal anesthesia is also an important factor that enhances corneal melting and perforation. The surgical intervention performed healed the corneal perforation. Conclusions: Corneal anaesthesia and topical anti-inflammatory administration led to corneal perforation. Corneal sensitivity should be tested in patients with corneal foreign body. Corneal patching proved to be an adequate solution in this patient.