Estimating cognitive workload levels is an emerging research topic in the cognitive neuroscience domain, as participants\' performance is highly influenced by cognitive overload or underload results. Different physiological measures such as Electroencephalography (EEG), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Functional near-infrared spectroscopy, respiratory activity, and eye activity are efficiently used to estimate workload levels with the help of machine learning or deep learning techniques. Some reviews focus only on EEG-based workload estimation using machine learning classifiers or multimodal fusion of different physiological measures for workload estimation. However, a detailed analysis of all physiological measures for estimating cognitive workload levels still needs to be discovered. Thus, this survey highlights the in-depth analysis of all the physiological measures for assessing cognitive workload. This survey emphasizes the basics of cognitive workload, open-access datasets, the experimental paradigm of cognitive tasks, and different measures for estimating workload levels. Lastly, we emphasize the significant findings from this review and identify the open challenges. In addition, we also specify future scopes for researchers to overcome those challenges.

BACKGROUND: With the rapid advancement of deep learning network technology, the application of facial recognition technology in the medical field has received increasing attention.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically review the literature of the past decade on facial recognition technology based on deep learning networks in the diagnosis of rare dysmorphic diseases and facial paralysis, among other conditions, to determine the effectiveness and applicability of this technology in disease identification.
METHODS: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for literature search and retrieved relevant literature from multiple databases, including PubMed, on 31 December 2023. The search keywords included deep learning convolutional neural networks, facial recognition, and disease recognition. A total of 208 articles on facial recognition technology based on deep learning networks in disease diagnosis over the past 10 years were screened, and 22 articles were selected for analysis. The meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 14.0 software.
RESULTS: The study collected 22 articles with a total sample size of 57 539 cases, of which 43 301 were samples with various diseases. The meta-analysis results indicated that the accuracy of deep learning in facial recognition for disease diagnosis was 91.0% [95% CI (87.0%, 95.0%)].
CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggested that facial recognition technology based on deep learning networks has high accuracy in disease diagnosis, providing a reference for further development and application of this technology.

Time series forecasting still awaits a transformative breakthrough like that happened in computer vision and natural language processing. The absence of extensive, domain-independent benchmark datasets and standardized performance measurement units poses a significant challenge for it, especially for photovoltaic forecasting applications. Additionally, since it is often time domain-driven, a plethora of highly unique and domain-specific datasets were produced. The lack of uniformity among published models, developed under diverse settings for varying forecasting horizons, and assessed using non-standardized metrics, remains a significant obstacle to the progress of the field as a whole. To address these issues, a systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on prediction tasks is presented, collected from the Web of Science and Scopus databases, published in 2022 and 2023, and filtered using keywords such as \"photovoltaic,\" \"deep learning,\" \"forecasting,\" and \"time series.\" Finally, 36 case studies were selected. Before comparing, a state-of-the-art demonstration of key elements in the topic was presented, such as model type, hyperparameters, and evaluation metrics. Then, the 36 articles were compared in terms of statistical analysis, including top publishing countries, data sources, variables, input, and output horizon, followed by an overall model comparison demonstrating every proposed model categorized into model type (artificial neural network units, recurrent units, convolutional units, and transformer units). Due to the mostly utilization of specific private datasets measured at the targeted location, having universal error metrics is crucial for clear global benchmarking. Root Mean Squared Error and Mean Absolute Error were the most utilized metrics, although they specifically demonstrate the accuracy relative to their respective sites. However, 33% utilized universal metrics, such as Mean Absolute Percentage Error, Normalized Root Mean Squared Error, and the Coefficient of Determination. Finally, trends, challenges, and future research were highlighted for the relevant topic to spotlight and bypass the current challenges.

In the last decade, artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly impacted ophthalmology, particularly in managing corneal diseases, a major reversible cause of blindness. This review explores AI\'s transformative role in the corneal subspecialty, which has adopted advanced technology for superior clinical judgment, early diagnosis, and personalized therapy. While AI\'s role in anterior segment diseases is less documented compared to glaucoma and retinal pathologies, this review highlights its integration into corneal diagnostics through imaging techniques like slit-lamp biomicroscopy, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and in vivo confocal biomicroscopy. AI has been pivotal in refining decision-making and prognosis for conditions such as keratoconus, infectious keratitis, and dystrophies. Multi-disease deep learning neural networks (MDDNs) have shown diagnostic ability in classifying corneal diseases using AS-OCT images, achieving notable metrics like an AUC of 0.910. AI\'s progress over two decades has significantly improved the accuracy of diagnosing conditions like keratoconus and microbial keratitis. For instance, AI has achieved a 90.7% accuracy rate in classifying bacterial and fungal keratitis and an AUC of 0.910 in differentiating various corneal diseases. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have enhanced the analysis of color-coded corneal maps, yielding up to 99.3% diagnostic accuracy for keratoconus. Deep learning algorithms have also shown robust performance in detecting fungal hyphae on in vivo confocal microscopy, with precise quantification of hyphal density. AI models combining tomography scans and visual acuity have demonstrated up to 97% accuracy in keratoconus staging according to the Amsler-Krumeich classification. However, the review acknowledges the limitations of current AI models, including their reliance on binary classification, which may not capture the complexity of real-world clinical presentations with multiple coexisting disorders. Challenges also include dependency on data quality, diverse imaging protocols, and integrating multimodal images for a generalized AI diagnosis. The need for interpretability in AI models is emphasized to foster trust and applicability in clinical settings. Looking ahead, AI has the potential to unravel the intricate mechanisms behind corneal pathologies, reduce healthcare\'s carbon footprint, and revolutionize diagnostic and management paradigms. Ethical and regulatory considerations will accompany AI\'s clinical adoption, marking an era where AI not only assists but augments ophthalmic care.

OBJECTIVE: To assess artificial intelligence (AI) ability to evaluate intraprostatic prostate cancer (PCa) on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) scans prior to active treatment (radiotherapy or prostatectomy).
METHODS: This systematic review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO identifier: CRD42023438706). A search was performed on Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Engineering Village with the following terms: \'artificial intelligence\', \'prostate cancer\', and \'PSMA PET\'. All articles published up to February 2024 were considered. Studies were included if patients underwent PSMA PET scan to evaluate intraprostatic lesions prior to active treatment. The two authors independently evaluated titles, abstracts, and full text. The Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was used.
RESULTS: Our search yield 948 articles, of which 14 were eligible for inclusion. Eight studies met the primary endpoint of differentiating high-grade PCa. Differentiating between International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) ≥3 PCa had an accuracy between 0.671 to 0.992, sensitivity of 0.91, specificity of 0.35. Differentiating ISUP GG ≥4 PCa had an accuracy between 0.83 and 0.88, sensitivity was 0.89, specificity was 0.87. AI could identify non-PSMA-avid lesions with an accuracy of 0.87, specificity of 0.85, and specificity of 0.89. Three studies demonstrated ability of AI to detect extraprostatic extensions with an area under curve between 0.70 and 0.77. Lastly, AI can automate segmentation of intraprostatic lesion and measurement of gross tumour volume.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the current state of AI differentiating high-grade PCa is promising, it remains experimental and not ready for routine clinical application. Benefits of using AI to assess intraprostatic lesions on PSMA PET scans include: local staging, identifying otherwise radiologically occult lesions, standardisation and expedite reporting of PSMA PET scans. Larger, prospective, multicentre studies are needed.

BACKGROUND: The surge in emergency head CT imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) advancements, especially deep learning (DL) and convolutional neural networks (CNN), have accelerated the development of computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) for emergency imaging. External validation assesses model generalizability, providing preliminary evidence of clinical potential.
OBJECTIVE: This study systematically reviews externally validated CNN-CADx models for emergency head CT scans, critically appraises diagnostic test accuracy (DTA), and assesses adherence to reporting guidelines.
METHODS: Studies comparing CNN-CADx model performance to reference standard were eligible. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023411641) and conducted on Medline, Embase, EBM-Reviews and Web of Science following PRISMA-DTA guideline. DTA reporting were systematically extracted and appraised using standardised checklists (STARD, CHARMS, CLAIM, TRIPOD, PROBAST, QUADAS-2).
RESULTS: Six of 5636 identified studies were eligible. The common target condition was intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), and intended workflow roles auxiliary to experts. Due to methodological and clinical between-study variation, meta-analysis was inappropriate. The scan-level sensitivity exceeded 90 % in 5/6 studies, while specificities ranged from 58,0-97,7 %. The SROC 95 % predictive region was markedly broader than the confidence region, ranging above 50 % sensitivity and 20 % specificity. All studies had unclear or high risk of bias and concern for applicability (QUADAS-2, PROBAST), and reporting adherence was below 50 % in 20 of 32 TRIPOD items.
CONCLUSIONS: 0.01 % of identified studies met the eligibility criteria. The evidence on the DTA of CNN-CADx models for emergency head CT scans remains limited in the scope of this review, as the reviewed studies were scarce, inapt for meta-analysis and undermined by inadequate methodological conduct and reporting. Properly conducted, external validation remains preliminary for evaluating the clinical potential of AI-CADx models, but prospective and pragmatic clinical validation in comparative trials remains most crucial. In conclusion, future AI-CADx research processes should be methodologically standardized and reported in a clinically meaningful way to avoid research waste.

Research on transformers in remote sensing (RS), which started to increase after 2021, is facing the problem of a relative lack of review. To understand the trends of transformers in RS, we undertook a quantitative analysis of the major research on transformers over the past two years by dividing the application of transformers into eight domains: land use/land cover (LULC) classification, segmentation, fusion, change detection, object detection, object recognition, registration, and others. Quantitative results show that transformers achieve a higher accuracy in LULC classification and fusion, with more stable performance in segmentation and object detection. Combining the analysis results on LULC classification and segmentation, we have found that transformers need more parameters than convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Additionally, further research is also needed regarding inference speed to improve transformers\' performance. It was determined that the most common application scenes for transformers in our database are urban, farmland, and water bodies. We also found that transformers are employed in the natural sciences such as agriculture and environmental protection rather than the humanities or economics. Finally, this work summarizes the analysis results of transformers in remote sensing obtained during the research process and provides a perspective on future directions of development.

In recent years, there has been a significant improvement in the accuracy of the classification of pigmented skin lesions using artificial intelligence algorithms. Intelligent analysis and classification systems are significantly superior to visual diagnostic methods used by dermatologists and oncologists. However, the application of such systems in clinical practice is severely limited due to a lack of generalizability and risks of potential misclassification. Successful implementation of artificial intelligence-based tools into clinicopathological practice requires a comprehensive study of the effectiveness and performance of existing models, as well as further promising areas for potential research development. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate and evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence technologies for detecting malignant forms of pigmented skin lesions. For the study, 10,589 scientific research and review articles were selected from electronic scientific publishers, of which 171 articles were included in the presented systematic review. All selected scientific articles are distributed according to the proposed neural network algorithms from machine learning to multimodal intelligent architectures and are described in the corresponding sections of the manuscript. This research aims to explore automated skin cancer recognition systems, from simple machine learning algorithms to multimodal ensemble systems based on advanced encoder-decoder models, visual transformers (ViT), and generative and spiking neural networks. In addition, as a result of the analysis, future directions of research, prospects, and potential for further development of automated neural network systems for classifying pigmented skin lesions are discussed.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this systematic review (SR) is to gather evidence on the use of machine learning (ML) models in the diagnosis of intraosseous lesions in gnathic bones and to analyze the reliability, impact, and usefulness of such models. This SR was performed in accordance with the PRISMA 2022 guidelines and was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022379298).
METHODS: The acronym PICOS was used to structure the inquiry-focused review question \"Is Artificial Intelligence reliable for the diagnosis of intraosseous lesions in gnathic bones?\" The literature search was conducted in various electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Lilacs, IEEE Xplore, and Gray Literature (Google Scholar and ProQuest). Risk of bias assessment was performed using PROBAST, and the results were synthesized by considering the task and sampling strategy of the dataset.
RESULTS: Twenty-six studies were included (21 146 radiographic images). Ameloblastomas, odontogenic keratocysts, dentigerous cysts, and periapical cysts were the most frequently investigated lesions. According to TRIPOD, most studies were classified as type 2 (randomly divided). The F1 score was presented in only 13 studies, which provided the metrics for 20 trials, with a mean of 0.71 (±0.25).
CONCLUSIONS: There is no conclusive evidence to support the usefulness of ML-based models in the detection, segmentation, and classification of intraosseous lesions in gnathic bones for routine clinical application. The lack of detail about data sampling, the lack of a comprehensive set of metrics for training and validation, and the absence of external testing limit experiments and hinder proper evaluation of model performance.

Background and Objectives: The availability of multiple dental implant systems makes it difficult for the treating dentist to identify and classify the implant in case of inaccessibility or loss of previous records. Artificial intelligence (AI) is reported to have a high success rate in medical image classification and is effectively used in this area. Studies have reported improved implant classification and identification accuracy when AI is used with trained dental professionals. This systematic review aims to analyze various studies discussing the accuracy of AI tools in implant identification and classification. Methods: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). The focused PICO question for the current study was \"What is the accuracy (outcome) of artificial intelligence tools (Intervention) in detecting and/or classifying the type of dental implant (Participant/population) using X-ray images?\" Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE-PubMed, and Cochrane were searched systematically to collect the relevant published literature. The search strings were based on the formulated PICO question. The article search was conducted in January 2024 using the Boolean operators and truncation. The search was limited to articles published in English in the last 15 years (January 2008 to December 2023). The quality of all the selected articles was critically analyzed using the Quality Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Tool (QUADAS-2). Results: Twenty-one articles were selected for qualitative analysis based on predetermined selection criteria. Study characteristics were tabulated in a self-designed table. Out of the 21 studies evaluated, 14 were found to be at risk of bias, with high or unclear risk in one or more domains. The remaining seven studies, however, had a low risk of bias. The overall accuracy of AI models in implant detection and identification ranged from a low of 67% to as high as 98.5%. Most included studies reported mean accuracy levels above 90%. Conclusions: The articles in the present review provide considerable evidence to validate that AI tools have high accuracy in identifying and classifying dental implant systems using 2-dimensional X-ray images. These outcomes are vital for clinical diagnosis and treatment planning by trained dental professionals to enhance patient treatment outcomes.