BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus on standardized measurement instruments (MIs) for the assessment of cognitive communication disorders in individuals with acquired brain injury (ABI).
OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe the currently available MIs for the assessment of cognitive communication disorders in individuals with ABI and to evaluate the psychometric properties of MIs.
METHODS: A search was conducted in 6 databases on March 12, 2024 using a validated methodological search filter. We included studies that evaluated psychometric properties of MIs used to assess cognitive communication disorders in individuals with ABI. We applied the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) to evaluate the psychometric properties of the MIs.
RESULTS: We included 48 records reporting on 44 MIs. Of all MIs, the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire (LCQ) and the St Andrew\'s-Swansea Neurobehavioural Outcome Scale (SASNOS) were studied most extensively. No MIs had undergone exhaustive methodological evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the COSMIN, only 1 of 44 MIs can be recommended as its results can be trusted. Most MIs have the potential to be recommended but require further research to assess their psychometric quality. The development of new tools is not necessary but further methodological studies should be conducted on promising tools. This review may help clinicians and researchers to select an MI for the assessment of cognitive communication disorders and may facilitate diagnosis and research.
BACKGROUND: PROSPERO database (registration number: CRD42020196861). No funding.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe acute brain injury have a high risk of a poor clinical outcome due to primary and secondary brain injury. Ketamine reportedly inhibits cortical spreading depolarization, an electrophysiological phenomenon that has been associated with secondary brain injury, making ketamine potentially attractive for patients with severe acute brain injury. The aim of this systematic review is to explore the current literature regarding ketamine for patients with severe acute brain injury.
METHODS: We systematically searched international databases for randomized clinical trials comparing ketamine by any regimen versus placebo, no intervention, or any control drug for patients with severe acute brain injury. Two authors independently reviewed and selected trials for inclusion, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and performed analysis using Review Manager and Trial Sequential Analysis. Evidence certainty was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. The primary outcomes were the proportion of participants with an unfavorable functional outcome, the proportion of participants with one or more serious adverse events, and quality of life.
RESULTS: We identified five randomized trials comparing ketamine versus sufentanil, fentanyl, other sedatives, or saline (total N = 149 participants). All outcomes were at overall high risk of bias. The proportions of participants with one or more serious adverse events did not differ between ketamine and sufentanil or fentanyl (relative risk 1.45, 95% confidence interval 0.81-2.58; very low certainty). Trial sequential analysis showed that further trials are needed.
CONCLUSIONS: The level of evidence regarding the effects of ketamine on functional outcome and serious adverse events in patients with severe acute brain injury is very low. Ketamine may markedly, modestly, or not at all affect these outcomes. Large randomized clinical trials at low risk of bias are needed.

Brain death (BD) represents the irreversible loss of all brain functions, including the brainstem, and is equivalent to clinical death established by neurological criteria. However, clinical diagnosis, mainly based on the absence of primary reflexes post-acute brain injury, remains a challenge in hospital settings. The S100 calcium-binding protein beta (S100b) is used to monitor brain injuries, as recommended by neurotrauma care guidelines in some countries. Its levels are associated with severity and mortality, particularly after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and cerebral hemorrhage. The evaluation of S100b levels in investigating brain death is promising; however, aspects such as cutoff values remain to be elucidated. This paper reviews the literature on the use of S100b as a biomarker in diagnosing brain death. It is noteworthy that there is still no defined cutoff for S100b levels in confirming brain death. Additionally, when considering the use of S100b in emergency situations, a point-of-care methodology should be established to support clinical decision-making quickly and easily in the early identification of patients who are more likely to progress to brain death. In this context, S100b levels may assist in establishing the diagnosis of brain death, complementing existing clinical evidence. This, in turn, can optimize and qualify the organ donation process, reducing costs with ineffective therapies and minimizing the suffering of the families involved.

BACKGROUND: Oxygen is frequently prescribed in neurocritical care units. Avoiding hypoxaemia is a key objective in patients with acute brain injury (ABI). However, several studies suggest that hyperoxaemia may also be related to higher mortality and poor neurological outcomes in these patients. The evidence in this direction is still controversial due to the limited number of prospective studies, the lack of a common definition for hyperoxaemia, the heterogeneity in experimental designs and the different causes of ABI. To explore the correlation between hyperoxaemia and poor neurological outcomes and mortality in hospitalised adult patients with ABI, we will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and RCTs.
METHODS: The systematic review methods have been defined according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and follow the PRISMA-Protocols structure. Studies published until June 2024 will be identified in the electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and ClinicalTrials.gov. Retrieved records will be independently screened by four authors working in pairs, and the selected variables will be extracted from studies reporting data on the effect of \'hyperoxaemia\' versus \'no hyperoxaemia on neurological outcomes and mortality in hospitalised patients with ABI. We will use covariate-adjusted ORs as outcome measures when reported since they account for potential cofounders and provide a more accurate estimate of the association between hyperoxaemia and outcomes; when not available, we will use univariate ORs. If the study presents the results as relative risks, it will be considered equivalent to the OR as long as the prevalence of the condition is close to 10%. Pooled estimates of both outcomes will be calculated applying random-effects meta-analysis. Interstudy heterogeneity will be assessed using the I2 statistic; risk of bias will be assessed through Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions, Newcastle-Ottawa or RoB2 tools. Depending on data availability, we plan to conduct subgroup analyses by ABI type (traumatic brain injury, postcardiac arrest, subarachnoid haemorrhage, intracerebral haemorrhage and ischaemic stroke), arterial partial pressure of oxygen values, study quality, study time, neurological scores and other selected clinical variables of interest.
BACKGROUND: Specific ethics approval consent is not required as this is a review of previously published anonymised data. Results of the study will be shared with the scientific community via publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at relevant conferences and workshops. It will also be shared key stakeholders, such as national or international health authorities, healthcare professionals and the general population, via scientific outreach journals and research institutes\' newsletters.

UNASSIGNED: Nontraumatic brain injury encompasses various pathological processes and medical conditions that result in brain dysfunction and neurological impairment without direct physical trauma. The study aimed to assess the efficacy of intravenous administration of 20% mannitol and 3% hypertonic saline to reduce intracranial pressure in nontraumatic brain injury.
UNASSIGNED: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed for study selection and data extraction. The search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, including articles published in English from January 2003 to December 2023. Our study included randomized controlled trials, comparative studies, prospective analyses, and retrospective cohort studies. We extracted data on baseline characteristics of patients, intervention details, major outcomes, and complications. Quality assessment was performed using the Jadad scale and the Robvis assessment tool for risk of bias.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 14 studies involving 1,536 patients were included in the analysis. Seven studies reported hypertonic saline as more effective in reducing intracranial pressure, while three studies found similar effectiveness for both interventions. Adverse events were reported in only three studies. The studies that reported complication rates ranged from 21 to 79%. A meta-analysis was conducted on five studies, showing varying rates of adverse events associated with mannitol and hypertonic saline.
UNASSIGNED: Both hypertonic saline solution and mannitol have been explored as treatment options for decreasing intracranial pressure in nontraumatic brain injuries. While some studies indicate the superiority of hypertonic saline, others report similar effectiveness between the two interventions.
UNASSIGNED: Choudhury A, Ravikant, Bairwa M, Jithesh G, Kumar S, Kumar N. Efficacy of Intravenous 20% Mannitol vs 3% Hypertonic Saline in Reducing Intracranial Pressure in Nontraumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(7):686-695.

BACKGROUND: Patients with an acquired brain injury (ABI) are at an increased risk of undernutrition due to the disease-related inflammation and other numerous symptoms that impact their nutrition. Unfortunately, recommendations related to nutritional interventions and related efforts vary. The objective of this scoping review is to map the body of literature on nutritional interventions and related efforts provided by health professionals, such as screening or assessments, addressing undernutrition in adults with a moderate to severe ABI during the subacute rehabilitation pathway.
METHODS: The review follows the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The librarian-assisted search strategy will be conducted in the bibliographical databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and OpenGrey. Indexed and grey literature in English, German or Scandinavian languages from January 2010 will be considered for inclusion. Two independent reviewers will conduct the iterative process of screening the identified literature, paper selection and data extraction. Disagreements will be resolved by discussion until a consensus is reached. A template will be used to guide the data extraction. This scoping review will include research articles, methodological papers and clinical guidelines reporting on nutritional interventions or related efforts to prevent or address undernutrition in adult patients (≥18 years) with moderate to severe ABI within the first year after admission to rehabilitation hospital. We will map all kinds of nutritional efforts provided by professionals in different settings within high-income countries, including interventions targeting relatives.
BACKGROUND: This review will involve the collection and analysis of secondary sources that have been published and/or are publicly available. Therefore, ethics approval is not required. The results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal, presented at scientific conferences and disseminated through digital science communication platforms.
BACKGROUND: Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/H5GJX.

UNASSIGNED: To examine the safety of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) assessment and training in the early sub-acute phase of recovery (≤3 months) following moderate-to-extremely severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
UNASSIGNED: A systematic review was completed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies investigating adults and adolescents ≥15 years with moderate-to-extremely severe TBI were considered for inclusion. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the McMaster Guidelines for Critical Review Form - Quantitative Studies.
UNASSIGNED: Eleven studies with a total of 380 participants were included in the review. Adverse events (AEs) and symptom monitoring were poorly reported. Only four studies reported on the occurrence of AEs, with a total of eight AEs reported. Three of the reported AEs were concussion-like symptoms with no further exercise-induced symptom exacerbation reported. No serious AEs were reported.
UNASSIGNED: There is no evidence to suggest that CRF assessment and training is unsafe in the early sub-acute phase of recovery following moderate-to-extremely severe TBI. However, despite the low AE and symptom exacerbation rates identified, a timeframe for safe commencement was unable to be established due to poor reporting and/or monitoring of exercise-induced symptoms and AEs in the current literature.

UNASSIGNED: To systematically review the prevalence, risk factors and timing of onset of hip displacement in children with a post-neonatal (PNN) brain injury with regards to hip surveillance recommendations.
UNASSIGNED: A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science was conducted on 22nd February 2022. Studies were included if they reported presence of, and risk factors for, hip displacement in children with PNN brain injury. Data was extracted on patient characteristics, and analyzed in terms of risk factors of interest and timing of development of hip displacement.
UNASSIGNED: Six studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 408 participants). All were cohort studies: five retrospective and one prospective. Rates of hip displacement ranged from 1% to 100%, and were higher in children with diffuse brain injury at an early age, who were non-ambulant and had spastic quadriplegia. Hip displacement and hip dislocation were first identified at one and three months respectively following PNN brain injury.
UNASSIGNED: Evidence on hip displacement in children with PNN brain injury is sparse and low quality. Children who remain non-ambulant after diffuse PNN brain injury before five years of age appear most at risk of developing progressive hip displacement and earlier hip surveillance is recommended.
As for children with cerebral palsy (CP), children with a post-neonatal (PNN) brain injury who are non-ambulant are most at risk of progressive hip displacement.Children with a diffuse brain injury before five years of age appear to be at greater risk.Hip displacement can occur very early and progress rapidly following PNN brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of the current state of knowledge on factors related to relationship quality and relationship stability after stroke.
METHODS: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Embase, MEDLINE, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, APA PsycINFO, and PubMed were searched on November 15, 2022, for literature on factors associated with (1) relation quality and (2) relation stability after stroke.
METHODS: English quantitative and qualitative studies investigating factors associated with relation quality and/or stability after stroke were included. Three reviewers independently assessed eligibility. Consensus meetings were held in case of divergent opinions. A total of 44 studies were included.
METHODS: Information regarding study objectives and characteristics, participant demographics, independent and dependent variables, and main findings was extracted. Study quality was rated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies and/or the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklist for Qualitative Research. Both were administered by the lead reviewer and checked by the second reviewer. Identified factors are described and presented according to the domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health model.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven factors related to relationship quality after stroke were identified, covering the domains of body functions and structures (eg, cognitive problems), activities (eg, decrease in physical intimacy), participation (eg, being socially active), environment (eg, medication side effects), and personal factors (eg, hypervigilance). Eight factors related to relationship stability were identified, covering the domains of participation (agreement on reciprocal roles) and personal factors (eg, quality of prestroke relation).
CONCLUSIONS: Relationship quality and stability after stroke are related to a multitude of factors. Future research should confirm the relevance of factors found in a few studies of suboptimal quality; explore possible associations between relationship stability and factors falling in the domains of body functions and structure, activity, and environmental factors; and explicitly explore potential positive effects of stroke on relationships.

Seizure disorders have often been found to be associated with corpus callosum injuries, but in most cases, they remain undiagnosed. Understanding the clinical, electrographic, and neuroradiological alternations can be crucial in delineating this entity.
This systematic review aims to analyze the effects of corpus callosum injuries on seizure semiology, providing insights into the neuroscientific and clinical implications of such injuries.
Adhering to the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search across multiple databases, including PubMed/Medline, NIH, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Cross-ref, was conducted until September 25, 2023. Studies on seizures associated with corpus callosum injuries, excluding other cortical or sub-cortical involvements, were included. Machine learning (Random Forest) and deep learning (1D-CNN) algorithms were employed for data classification.
Initially, 1250 articles were identified from the mentioned databases, and additional 350 were found through other relevant sources. Out of all these articles, 41 studies met the inclusion criteria, collectively encompassing 56 patients The most frequent clinical manifestations included generalized tonic-clonic seizures, complex partial seizures, and focal seizures. The most common callosal injuries were related to reversible splenial lesion syndrome and cytotoxic lesions. Machine learning and deep learning analyses revealed significant correlations between seizure types, semiological parameters, and callosal injury locations. Complete recovery was reported in the majority of patients post-treatment.
Corpus callosum injuries have diverse impacts on seizure semiology. This review highlights the importance of understanding the role of the corpus callosum in seizure propagation and manifestation. The findings emphasize the need for targeted diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in managing seizures associated with callosal injuries. Future research should focus on expanding the data pool and exploring the underlying mechanisms in greater detail.