Blood Group Incompatibility

血型不相容
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:供者和受者之间的ABO血型不匹配会影响移植的成功以及异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)过程中的红细胞问题。然而,恒河猴(Rh)D错配对同种异体HCT移植结局的影响尚不清楚.
    方法:我们使用日本注册数据库回顾性评估了2000年至2021年间接受同种异体HCT的64,923例患者中RhD错配对移植后结局的影响。
    结果:在整个小组中,当受体或供体与(+/+)RhD不匹配时,进行了64,293、322、270和38个HCTs,(-/+),(+/-)或(-/-)组合。接受者/捐赠者之间的RhD差异(-/+),(+/-)和(-/-)不影响造血恢复,急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD),总生存期(OS),在多变量分析中,将RhD(+/+)用作参照组时,非复发死亡率(NRM)或复发.
    结论:我们基于注册的研究表明,受体和供体之间的RhD不匹配并没有显著影响造血恢复,GVHD,操作系统,同种异体HCT后NRM或复发。这些数据表明,对于同种异体HCT中的受体和供体组合,可能不需要避免RhD错配。
    OBJECTIVE: ABO blood group mismatch between the donor and the recipient can affect the success of the transplant as well as problems with the red blood cells during allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, the impact of the Rhesus (Rh) D mismatch on transplant outcomes in allogeneic HCT has been poorly elucidated.
    METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the impact of the RhD mismatch on post-transplant outcomes in 64,923 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT between 2000 and 2021 using a Japanese registry database.
    RESULTS: Out of the whole group, 64,293, 322, 270 and 38 HCTs were done when the recipient or donor was RhD-mismatched with (+/+), (-/+), (+/-) or (-/-) combinations. The difference in RhD between recipient/donor (-/+), (+/-) and (-/-) did not affect haematopoietic recovery, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM) or relapse when RhD (+/+) was used as the reference group in multivariate analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our registry-based study demonstrated that RhD mismatch between recipient and donor did not significantly impact haematopoietic recovery, GVHD, OS, NRM or relapse after allogeneic HCT. These data suggest that RhD mismatches may not need to be avoided for recipient and donor combinations in allogeneic HCT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术由于可用供体肝脏的短缺和移植等待时间的增加,来自已故供体的ABO不相容肝移植(ABO-ILT)的使用变得更加普遍。这项来自赫尔辛基大学医院国家移植中心的回顾性研究,芬兰,旨在评估1987年至2022年间ABO不相容的已故供体小儿肝移植的长期结局。材料与方法169例小儿肝移植中16例(9.5%)为ABO-ILTs。移植时的中位年龄为5.0(0.5-15.4)岁。ABO-ILTs的原因是急性肝功能衰竭(18.75%),恶性肿瘤(12.5%),体型小,等待时间长(25%),等原因(43.75%)。移植后随访时间中位数为147(0.72-353)个月。将患者和移植物的存活率以及手术并发症的发生与ABO相同的移植物进行比较,分析抗ABO抗体滴度。结果1-,3-,ABO-I组和ABO相容组的5年患者生存率相当,为81.3%,73.9%,73.9%(ABO-I)和87.5%,82.5%,77.9%(ABO兼容),分别。3例ABO-ILTs患者在移植后的前3个月内死于脓毒症和多器官功能衰竭。在接受ABO-ILT和ABO相容性肝移植的受者之间,胆道并发症和早期血管血栓形成的发生(移植后<30天)没有显着差异。结论这项研究的结果支持以前的研究结果,即儿童ABO不相容肝移植后的结果与ABO相同肝移植的结果相当。
    BACKGROUND The use of ABO-incompatible liver transplants (ABO-ILTs) from deceased donors has become more common due to the shortage of available donor livers and increased transplant waiting times. This retrospective study from a national transplant center at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of ABO-incompatible deceased donor pediatric liver transplants between 1987 and 2022. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixteen (9.5%) of the 169 pediatric liver transplantations were ABO-ILTs. The median age at transplantation was 5.0 (0.5-15.4) years. Reasons for ABO-ILTs were acute liver failure (18.75%), malignancy (12.5%), small body size and long waiting time (25%), and other reasons (43.75%). The median post-transplant follow-up time was 147 (0.72-353) months. Patient and graft survival and occurrence of surgical complications were compared to ABO-identical transplants, and anti-ABO antibody titers were analyzed. RESULTS The 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient survivals were comparable between the ABO-I and ABO-compatible groups, being 81.3%, 73.9%, and 73.9% (ABO-I) and 87.5%, 82.5%, 77.9% (ABO-compatible), respectively. Three patients with ABO-ILTs died of sepsis and multiorgan failure during the first 3 months after transplantation. The occurrence of biliary complications and early vascular thrombosis (<30 days after transplantation) did not differ significantly between recipients with an ABO-ILT vs ABO-compatible liver graft. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this study support findings from previous studies that outcomes after ABO-incompatible liver transplants in children were comparable to outcomes from ABO-identical liver transplants.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在研究ABO相容和ABO不相容的肾移植受者围手术期感染和移植物生存力的发生率。
    方法:我们纳入了1998年至2021年在Michinoku肾移植网络中注册的643例活体肾移植受者。患者分为ABO相容和ABO不相容的肾移植组。我们比较了两组的特点,并评估了术后病毒感染(巨细胞病毒和BK病毒)的发生率,移植物无损失存活,两组的总生存率。
    结果:在643名患者中,485(75%)和158(25%)是ABO相容和ABO不相容的肾移植受者,分别。术后病毒感染,利妥昔单抗的使用,与ABO相容的移植受者相比,ABO不相容者的血浆置换明显更常见。然而,其他背景特征无显著差异.ABO不相容组比ABO相容组更有可能发生病毒感染。两组间无移植物丢失生存率和总生存率无显著差异。根据多元Cox回归分析,ABO相容性与移植物无损失生存率和总生存率无显著相关性。
    结论:尽管ABO血型不合的肾移植受者术后病毒感染的发生率增加,在排斥事件方面没有显着差异,移植物无损失存活,和总体生存率。
    OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to examine the incidence of perioperative infections and graft viability in ABO-compatible and ABO-incompatible renal transplant recipients.
    METHODS: We included 643 living donor renal transplant recipients registered in the Michinoku Renal Transplant Network from 1998 to 2021. Patients were divided into the ABO-compatible and ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation groups. We compared the characteristics of the two groups and evaluated the incidence of postoperative viral infections (cytomegalovirus and BK virus), graft loss-free survival, and overall survival between the two groups.
    RESULTS: Of 643 patients, 485 (75%) and 158 (25%) were ABO-compatible and ABO-incompatible renal transplant recipients, respectively. Postoperative viral infections, rituximab use, and plasma exchange were significantly more common in ABO-incompatible than in ABO-compatible transplant recipients. However, there were no significant differences in terms of other background characteristics. The ABO-incompatible group was more likely to develop viral infections than the ABO-compatible group. Graft loss-free survival and overall survival did not significantly differ between the two groups. According to the multivariate Cox regression analysis, ABO compatibility was not significantly associated with graft loss-free survival and overall survival.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although the incidence of postoperative viral infections in ABO-incompatible renal transplant recipients increased, there was no significant difference in terms of rejection events, graft loss-free survival, and overall survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估血浆中可溶性ABH物质(SAS)的中和能力(NCM),以指导选择合适的ABO组新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)进行血浆置换(PE)。通过测量包含一个单位的OFFP和IOOEDTA血浆样品的样品中的抗A和/或抗B滴度并用盐水稀释减去每组中的滴度的二元对数来评估中和能力。将来自每个血型的10个具有Lewisb(Leb)抗原阳性的EDTA血浆样品和10组汇集的FFP用作稀释剂。在OFFP中,对于IgM(总抗体)抗B,B和AB的NCM值(平均值±SD)分别为3.4±0.52(2.6±0.52)和2.6±0.52(1.5±0.3)(均P<0.001),在10OEDTA血浆样本中,IgM(P=0.0013)和总抗B(P=0.025)分别为3.9±0.88(3.1±0.88)和3.2±0.79(2.4±0.97),分别。体外分析表明,BFFP比ABFFP更有效地降低O受体的IgM和总抗B抗体滴度,无论Leb抗原阳性。
    Neutralizing capacity measurement (NCM) of soluble ABH substances (SAS) in plasma was assessed to guide the selection of the appropriate ABO group of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) for plasma exchange (PE) in blood group O recipients with ABO-incompatible transplantations. Neutralizing capacity was assessed by measuring anti-A and/or anti-B titers in samples comprising one unit of O FFP and 10 O EDTA plasma samples and subtracting the binary logarithm of the titer in each group with a saline dilution. Ten EDTA plasma samples with Lewis b (Leb) antigen positivity and 10 sets of pooled FFP from each blood group were used as diluents. In O FFP, the NCM values (mean±SD) were 3.4±0.52 (2.6±0.52) and 2.6±0.52 (1.5±0.3) in B and AB for IgM (total antibody) anti-B (both P<0.001), and in the 10 O EDTA plasma samples, they were 3.9±0.88 (3.1±0.88) and 3.2±0.79 (2.4±0.97) for IgM (P=0.0013) and total anti-B (P=0.025), respectively. In vitro analysis revealed that B FFP is more effective than AB FFP in reducing IgM and total anti-B antibody titers in O recipients, regardless of Leb antigen positivity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:新生儿溶血病(HDN)导致红细胞寿命缩短。与ABO不相容性相关的HDN大多未被注意到,因为没有进行常规筛查。这项研究是为了评估ABO-HDN的患病率并比较不同的免疫血液学测试。方法-在这项研究中,包括213个O组母亲和122个出生的ABO不相容新生儿。使用二硫苏糖醇(DTT)预处理的母体血清通过常规管技术(CTT)进行母体IgG抗A/抗B抗体滴度的定量。对滴度>256的母亲进行溶血素测试。对这些病例进行了随访,交货后,对ABOHDN进行了监测,以及直接的抗球蛋白测试和洗脱研究。计算ABO-HDN的患病率,并计算了测试的不同诊断参数。结果-ABO-HDN在我国人群中的患病率估计为1.7%,6.1%和10.6%的人口,O组母亲,和O组母亲与新生儿不相容,分别。母亲滴度≥512与ABOHDN密切相关。DAT阳性是ABO-HDN的良好预测因子,特别是使用敏感技术。母体IgG滴度具有最高的敏感性和阴性预测值,而DAT具有最高的特异性和阳性预测值。结论-中心可以提倡使用母体ABO抗体滴定来识别高危人群。它可以倡导机构交付和ABO-HDN对新生儿的专门随访。可以在O血型出生的所有新生儿中进行血型和DAT,以识别高风险病例。
    BACKGROUND: Hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) results in the decreased lifespan of the red cells. HDN related to ABO incompatibility is mostly unnoticed because routine screening is not being done. This study was done to assess the prevalence of ABO-HDN and to compare different immunohematological tests. Methods-In this study 213 O group mothers and the 122 ABO-incompatible newborns born to them were included. Quantifying the maternal IgG anti-A/anti-B antibody titer was done by Conventional Tube Technique (CTT) using Dithiothreitol (DTT) pretreated maternal serum. Hemolysin test was performed on the mothers having titer > 256. These cases were followed up and, after delivery, were monitored for ABO HDN, along with direct antiglobulin testing and elution studies. The prevalence of ABO-HDN was calculated, and the different diagnostic parameters of the tests were calculated. Results- The prevalence of ABO-HDN in our population was estimated to be 1.7%, 6.1% & 10.6% in our population, O group mothers, and O group mothers with ABOincompatible newborns, respectively. Maternal titer≥ 512 strongly correlated with ABOHDN. DAT positivity is a good predictor of ABO-HDN, especially using sensitive techniques. Maternal IgG titers have the highest sensitivity & Negative Predictive Value, while DAT has the highest specificity & Positive Predictive Value. Conclusion - Maternal ABO antibody titration may be advocated in the centers to identify high-risk groups. It can advocate institutional delivery and dedicated follow-up of newborns with ABO-HDN. Blood grouping & DAT may be performed in all newborns born to O blood group to identify high-risk cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于新兴国家的ABO不相容肾移植(ABOiKT),尚无可靠的循证数据。
    方法:2011年3月5日至2022年7月2日在印度进行的1759例活体供者ABOiKT和33157例ABO相容性肾移植(ABOcKT)的数据被纳入本回顾性研究,多中心(n=25)研究。主要结果包括管理协议,死亡率,移植物丢失,和活检证实的急性排斥反应(BPAR)。
    结果:方案包括利妥昔单抗100(232[13.18%]),200(877[49.85%]),和500毫克(569[32.34%]);免疫吸附(IA)(145[8.24%]),IVIG(663[37.69%]),无诱导200(11.37%)。死亡率,移植物丢失,和BPAR在167(9.49%)中报告,136(7.73%),和228名(12.96%)患者,分别,中位随访时间为36.3个月。在Cox比例风险模型中,IA组死亡率较高(危险比[HR]:2.53[1.62-3.97];P<0.001),BPAR(HR:1.83[1.25-2.69];P=0.0020),和移植物损失(HR:1.66[1.05-2.64];P=0.0310);提高移植物存活率与IVIG相关(HR:0.44[0.26-0.72];P=0.0010);常规管法(HR:3.22[1.9-5.46];P<0.0001)和IA使用(HR:2[1.37-2.92];P<0.0001),而BPAR较低的病例出现在疾病前期(HR:0.61[0.43-0.88];P=0.008).主要结局与利妥昔单抗给药或高预处理/预处理前抗A/抗B滴度无关。总感染发生率306(17.39%),巨细胞病毒66(3.75%),BK病毒多瘤病毒20型(1.13%)较低。在不匹配的单变量分析中,ABOiKT和ABOcKT之间的结局具有可比性.
    结论:我们关于ABOiKT的最大多中心研究提供了对各种方案和管理策略的见解,其结果与ABOcKT相当。
    BACKGROUND: There is no robust evidence-based data for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOiKT) from emerging countries.
    METHODS: Data from 1759 living donor ABOiKT and 33 157 ABO-compatible kidney transplantations (ABOcKT) performed in India between March 5, 2011, and July 2, 2022, were included in this retrospective, multicenter (n = 25) study. The primary outcomes included management protocols, mortality, graft loss, and biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR).
    RESULTS: Protocol included rituximab 100 (232 [13.18%]), 200 (877 [49.85%]), and 500 mg (569 [32.34%]); immunoadsorption (IA) (145 [8.24%]), IVIG (663 [37.69%]), and no induction 200 (11.37%). Mortality, graft loss, and BPAR were reported in 167 (9.49%), 136 (7.73%), and 228 (12.96%) patients, respectively, over a median follow-up of 36.3 mo. In cox proportional hazard model, mortality was higher with IA (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.53 [1.62-3.97]; P  < 0.001), BPAR (HR: 1.83 [1.25-2.69]; P  = 0.0020), and graft loss (HR: 1.66 [1.05-2.64]; P  = 0.0310); improved graft survival was associated with IVIG (HR: 0.44 [0.26-0.72]; P  = 0.0010); higher BPAR was reported with conventional tube method (HR: 3.22 [1.9-5.46]; P  < 0.0001) and IA use (HR: 2 [1.37-2.92]; P  < 0.0001), whereas lower BPAR was reported in the prepandemic era (HR: 0.61 [0.43-0.88]; P  = 0.008). Primary outcomes were not associated with rituximab dosing or high preconditioning/presurgery anti-A/anti-B titers. Incidence of overall infection 306 (17.39%), cytomegalovirus 66 (3.75%), and BK virus polyoma virus 20 (1.13%) was low. In unmatched univariate analysis, the outcomes between ABOiKT and ABOcKT were comparable.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our largest multicenter study on ABOiKT provides insights into various protocols and management strategies with results comparable to those of ABOcKT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The clinical outcomes of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation have improved with the introduction of desensitization therapy with rituximab. However, rituximab prevents not only antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) but also increases the risk of adverse events, such as infection. For ABOi kidney transplantation in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers, we previously used a rituximab-free desensitization protocol and then initiated a single dose of 100 mg rituximab in 2016. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of ABOi kidney transplantation in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers before and after the introduction of rituximab.
    ABOi kidney transplantations (n = 142) in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers between 2007 and 2021 were included. Patients were divided into two groups (with and without rituximab) for desensitization. The primary outcomes were the incidence of acute AMR and infection.
    Sixty-six patients were desensitized without rituximab (rituximab-free group), and 76 were pretreated with 100 mg rituximab (rituximab group) before transplantation. The incidence of acute AMR was significantly lower in the rituximab group than in the rituximab-free group (.0% [0/76] vs. 7.6% [5/66], respectively; p = .047). Post-transplantation anti-A/B antibody titers were also lower in the rituximab group than in the rituximab-free group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events, including infections, between the two groups.
    In ABOi kidney transplantation patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers, the desensitization protocol with a single dose of 100 mg rituximab was effective in preventing acute AMR without increasing the risk of other adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性溶血性输血反应(AHTR)担心是红细胞压积(PRBC)输血的并发症。本研究旨在通过在单个机构临床观察研究期间的所有事件,调查分离的酶相交叉配型不相容PRBC输血的临床后果。主要目的是检测AHTR。在研究期间施用94次感兴趣的输血。在73例中,实验室调查是充分的,其中未出现AHTR,并且记录了血红蛋白浓度的1.1g/dl平均增量。三次输血过早终止;然而,进一步调查排除了AHTR。其余21次输血也顺利完成,没有明显的临床恶化。这项研究的结果提供了临床验证,以省略输血前筛查与酶相交叉匹配,记录分离的酶相不相容输血的安全性和短期疗效。这些发现鼓励未来的临床研究了解这种输血的长期疗效,这对依赖输血的患者可能是有价值的。
    Acute hemolytic transfusion reactions (AHTRs) are feared complications of packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions. This study aimed to investigate the clinical consequences of isolated enzyme-phase crossmatch-incompatible PRBC transfusions by clinically observing all events during the study period at a single institution with the primary goal of detecting AHTRs. Ninety-four transfusions of interest were administered during the study period. Laboratory investigations were adequate in 73 episodes, where no AHTR developed and a mean hemoglobin concentration rise of 1.1 g/dL was documented. Three transfusions were terminated prematurely; however, further investigations ruled out AHTR. The remaining 21 transfusions were also completed uneventfully without noteworthy clinical deterioration. This study’s results provide clinical validation to omit pretransfusion screening with enzyme-phase crossmatch and document the safety and short-term efficacy of isolated enzyme-phase incompatible transfusions. The findings may encourage future clinical research to better understand the long-term efficacy of such transfusions, which may be valuable for transfusion-dependent patients.
    Eritrosit süspansiyonu (ES) transfüzyonlarının korkulan yan etkilerinden birisi akut hemolitik transfüzyon reaksiyonlarıdır (AHTR). Çalışma, izole enzim-fazı çapraz karşılaştırma testi uyumsuz olan ES transfüzyonlarını klinik olarak gözlemleyerek, bu transfüzyonların klinik sonuçlarını araştırmaktadır. Birincil sonlanım noktası, AHTR’lerin saptanmasıdır. Çalışma döneminde araştırmanın kriterlerine uygun 94 transfüzyon yapıldı ve tümü çalışmaya dahil edildi. Bu transfüzyonların 73’ünde yeterli laboratuar incelemesi vardı ve AHTR gelişmediği gösterildi. Bu 73 transfüzyonda ortanca hemoglobin konsantrasyonu artışı 1,1 g/dL oldu. Üç transfüzyon erken sonlandırıldı, fakat ileri incelemelerde AHTR dışlandı. Diğer 21 transfüzyonda yeterli laboratuar incelemesi yapılamasa da bu transfüzyonların sorunsuz tamamlandığı ve klinik takiplerde transfüzyon reaksiyonu düşündürecek klinik bulgu gelişmediği belgelendi. Çalışmanın verileri, enzimli ortamda çapraz karşılaştırmanın transfüzyon öncesi taramada gerekli olmayabileceğinin klinik doğrulaması niteliğindedir ve bu kan ürünlerinin kısa dönemde etkin olduğunu göstermektedir. Özellikle transfüzyona bağımlı hastaların tedavisindeki önemi nedeniyle, izole enzimli ortam uyumsuzluğu olan ES transfüzyonlarının uzun dönem etkinliğinin ileriye dönük kontrollü çalışmalarla araştırılmasını teşvik edici sonuçlar elde edilmiştir.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:新生儿溶血性疾病(HDN)是一种来自母体同种抗体的免疫性溶血性贫血。Rh免疫球蛋白(RhIg)预防可以防止D抗原的同种免疫。然而,RhIg在乌干达并不普遍可用。ABO不兼容也会导致HDN。我们确定了乌干达新生儿黄疸中HDN的患病率。
    方法:我们在Kawempe国家转诊医院进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究,坎帕拉,乌干达。纳入0-14日龄新生儿黄疸(或总胆红素>50μmol/L)的婴儿。临床评估和实验室测试,包括ABO,RhD分型和母体抗体筛查,被执行了。
    结果:共纳入466名婴儿。平均(SD)年龄为3.4(1.5)天。新生儿黄疸,17.2%(80/466)患有HDN。患有HDN的婴儿血红蛋白(SD)较低;与没有HDN的婴儿相比,15.7(2.7);16.4(2.4)g/dL,p=0.016;和更高的胆红素(四分位数间距);241(200-318)与没有HDN的人相比;219(191-263)μmol/L,p<0.001。一个婴儿患有抗DHDN,而46/466的HDN来自ABO不相容(抗A43.5%和抗B56.5%);82%的HDN婴儿还怀疑有新生儿败血症或出生窒息。约79.2%(57/72)的母亲没有在产前进行ABO/Rh血型检查。所有患有HDN的婴儿都存活下来,除了一个。
    结论:在新生儿黄疸中,HDN并不罕见。大多数是由于ABOHDN对A组和B组婴儿的影响相同。确保所有孕妇的常规ABO/Rh分组是一个需要改进的领域。
    OBJECTIVE: Haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) is an immune haemolytic anaemia from maternal alloantibodies. Rh immunoglobulin (RhIg) prophylaxis can prevent alloimmunization to the D antigen. However, RhIg is not universally available in Uganda. ABO incompatibility also causes HDN. We determined the prevalence of HDN among newborn infants with jaundice in Uganda.
    METHODS: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study at Kawempe National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. Infants aged 0-14 days with neonatal jaundice (or total bilirubin >50 μmol/L) were enrolled. Clinical evaluation and laboratory testing, including ABO, RhD typing and maternal antibody screen, were performed.
    RESULTS: A total of 466 babies were enrolled. The mean (SD) age was 3.4 (1.5) days. Of newborn babies with jaundice, 17.2% (80/466) had HDN. Babies with HDN had lower haemoglobin (SD); 15.7 (2.7) compared with those without HDN; 16.4 (2.4) g/dL, p = 0.016; and a higher bilirubin (interquartile range); 241 (200-318) compared with those without HDN; 219 (191-263) μmol/L, p < 0.001. One baby had anti-D HDN, while 46/466 had HDN from an ABO incompatibility (anti-A 43.5% and anti-B 56.5%); 82% of babies with HDN also had suspected neonatal sepsis or birth asphyxia. About 79.2% (57/72) of mothers did not have ABO/Rh blood group performed antenatally. All infants with HDN survived except one.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among newborn infants with jaundice, HDN is not rare. The majority is due to ABO HDN affecting group A and group B babies equally. Ensuring routine ABO/Rh grouping for all pregnant women is an area for improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:ABO不相容性不是禁忌症,但会影响异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)的预后。血液表型的动态变化不仅与患者的状态有关,也是实施相容输血的依据。判断完全转变为供体类型的标准和复发时输血的原则需要统一。我们旨在说明allo-HSCT后血型监测的意义。
    方法:我们收集了2010年1月至2019年12月接受ABO不相容allo-HSCT的263例患者,并根据患者复诊频率定期监测血型,直至完全转换或死亡。非参数检验用于发现不相容组之间的差异。我们通过二元Logistic模型分析了可能影响血型转换的因素。Cox回归模型用于说明血型转换与预后之间的关系。
    结果:转换的中位数分别为107、91和108天,分别为微型和双向组。血型转换与HLA相容性(P=0.012,OR=2.69)和急性移植物抗宿主病(P=0.001,OR=0.06)相关。血型转换不全患者的逝世亡率高于血型转换完全者(P=0.003,OR=3.703)。
    结论:血型监测有助于评估移植预后和评估死亡风险。建议监测血型抗原和抗体的变化,尤其是移植后一年内,预测不良事件的风险(如GVHD,复发,死亡,等。).
    BACKGROUND: ABO incompatibility is not a contraindication but would affect the prognosis of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The dynamic change of blood phenotype is not only related to the patient\'s status, but also the basis for the implementation of compatible blood transfusion. The criteria for judging a complete transformation to donor-type and the principle of blood transfusion at relapse need to be unified. We aimed to illustrate the significance of blood group monitoring after allo-HSCT.
    METHODS: We collected 263 patients underwent ABO incompatible allo-HSCT from January 2010 to December 2019, and monitored blood type regularly according to the frequency of the patient\'s return visits till complete conversion or death. Non-parametric test was used to find differences among incompatible groups. We analyzed factors potentially influence blood type conversion by Binary Logistic model. Cox regression model was used to illustrate the relationship between blood-type conversion and prognosis.
    RESULTS: The median days of conversion were 107, 91 and 108 in major-, minor- and bidirectional groups respectively. Blood type conversion correlated with HLA compatibility (P = 0.012, OR=2.69) and acute graft-versus-host-disease (P = 0.001, OR=0.06). Patients with incomplete blood type conversion had a higher death rate than those with complete blood type conversion(P = 0.003, OR=3.703).
    CONCLUSIONS: Blood type monitoring can help to evaluate the prognosis of transplantation and assess the risk of death. It is recommended to monitor the changes of blood group antigens and antibodies, especially within a year after transplantation, to predict the risk of adverse events (such as GVHD, recurrence, death, etc.).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号