Biology

Biology
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估改良的超声造影(CEUS)肝脏成像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)在没有已知肝细胞癌(HCC)危险因素的患者中区分恶性肿瘤的能力,并将诊断准确性与具有不同CEUS经验的放射科医师的世界超声医学和生物学联合会(WFUMB)指南的诊断准确性进行比较。
    方法:共包括848名无肝炎感染的个体,在非肝硬化肝脏中有870个病变,并分为测试和验证组。提出了改进的CEUSLI-RADS,包括具有典型特征的局灶性结节增生的降级。在测试组中评估改良CEUSLI-RADS的诊断性能。在“验证”组中,两名具有超过9年CEUS经验的放射科医师(专家)和两名具有少于6个月CEUS经验的放射科医师(新手)同时使用了改良的CELI-RADS和WFUMB指南来评估病变诊断的性能.
    结果:LR-5+M(改良LR-5和改良LR-M的组合)显示出具有灵敏度的最佳性能,特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)为99.3%,分别为81.6%和0.904。使用改良CEUSLI-RADS的新手优于使用WFUMB指南的新手(AUC:0.858vs.0.767,p=0.005)。此外,灵敏度,新手的特异性和AUC与使用改良CEUSLI-RADS的专家相当(94.1%,77.6%和0.858vs.96.1%,77.6%,专家0.868,分别)。
    结论:改良CEUSLI-RADS是鉴别无HCC危险因素患者肝脏恶性肿瘤的一种有价值的方法。这对于具有有限的CEUS专业知识的放射科医师是特别有益的。
    The aim of this study was to assess the ability of the modified contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) to distinguish malignancy in patients without known hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk factors and compare diagnostic accuracy with that of the World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) guideline across radiologists with different levels of CEUS experience.
    A total of 848 individuals with no hepatitis infection presenting with 870 lesions in non-cirrhotic livers were included and divided into the Testing and Validation groups. The modified CEUS LI-RADS was proposed, including downgrading of focal nodular hyperplasia with typical features. Diagnostic performance of the modified CEUS LI-RADS was assessed in the Testing group. In the Validation group, two radiologists with more than 9 y of CEUS experience (Experts) and two radiologists with less than 6 mo of CEUS experience (Novices) used both the modified CEUS LI-RADS and the WFUMB guideline to evaluate performance in diagnosis of the lesions.
    LR-5 + M (combination of modified LR-5 and modified LR-M) revealed optimal performance with a sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) of 99.3%, 81.6% and 0.904, respectively. Novices using the modified CEUS LI-RADS outperformed those using the WFUMB guideline (AUC: 0.858 vs. 0.767, p = 0.005). Additionally, the sensitivity, specificity and AUC of Novices were comparable to those of Experts using the modified CEUS LI-RADS (94.1%, 77.6% and 0.858 vs. 96.1%, 77.6% and 0.868 for experts, respectively).
    The modified CEUS LI-RADS is a valuable method for distinguishing hepatic malignancy in patients without HCC risk factors. This is particularly beneficial for radiologists with limited CEUS expertise.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    越来越多的证据表明,昼夜节律和昼夜节律强烈影响中风发作,机制,programming,recovery,以及对人类患者治疗的反应。开创性的初步调查产生了重要的见解,但通常是单中心系列,使用基本的成像方法,并使用了关键数据元素的冲突定义,包括白天和晚上的构成。人类神经血管研究的当代方法学进展有可能大大增加人们的理解,包括使用大型多中心和国家数据登记册,详细的临床试验数据集,以个体患者时间类型为指导的分析,以及多模态计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像。为了充分利用这些方法的力量来增强病理生理学知识,一个重要的基础步骤是为数据收集制定标准化的定义和编码指南,允许快速汇总不同研究中获得的数据,并确保共同的分析框架。为了满足这种需要,Leducq国际研究协会(CIRCA)召集了一个共识声明工作组,该工作组由脑血管和昼夜节律/昼夜生物学的国际研究人员组成。使用迭代,混合方法过程,工作组制定了79项数据标准,包括48个通用数据元素(23个新数据元素和25个现有通用数据元素的修改/未修改),14个不同粒度的时间锚定分析间隔,7、正式已验证的量表。这个标准化数据结构的组合现在可以帮助研究人员进行设计,实施,聚合,和临床解释,成像,与人类昼夜节律/昼夜生物学对缺血性和出血性中风的影响有关的人群研究。
    Increasing evidence indicates that circadian and diurnal rhythms robustly influence stroke onset, mechanism, progression, recovery, and response to therapy in human patients. Pioneering initial investigations yielded important insights but were often single-center series, used basic imaging approaches, and used conflicting definitions of key data elements, including what constitutes daytime versus nighttime. Contemporary methodologic advances in human neurovascular investigation have the potential to substantially increase understanding, including the use of large multicenter and national data registries, detailed clinical trial data sets, analysis guided by individual patient chronotype, and multimodal computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging. To fully harness the power of these approaches to enhance pathophysiologic knowledge, an important foundational step is to develop standardized definitions and coding guides for data collection, permitting rapid aggregation of data acquired in different studies, and ensuring a common framework for analysis. To meet this need, the Leducq Consortium International pour la Recherche Circadienne sur l\'AVC (CIRCA) convened a Consensus Statement Working Group of leading international researchers in cerebrovascular and circadian/diurnal biology. Using an iterative, mixed-methods process, the working group developed 79 data standards, including 48 common data elements (23 new and 25 modified/unmodified from existing common data elements), 14 intervals for time-anchored analyses of different granularity, and 7 formal, validated scales. This portfolio of standardized data structures is now available to assist researchers in the design, implementation, aggregation, and interpretation of clinical, imaging, and population research related to the influence of human circadian/diurnal biology upon ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    LDL胆固醇(LDL-C)降低用于心血管疾病预防的临床益处是有据可查的。这篇文章来自意大利动脉粥样硬化研究小组,血栓形成和血管生物学总结了目前治疗高胆固醇血症的建议,实施降脂治疗的障碍和克服这些障碍的技巧,以及bempedoicacid疗效和安全性的现有证据。鉴于在临床实践中引入了bempedoic酸,我们还报告了用于降低药理学LDL-C的最新治疗算法。
    The clinical benefit of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering for cardiovascular disease prevention is well documented. This paper from the Italian Study Group on Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology summarizes current recommendations for treatment of hypercholesterolemia, barriers to lipid-lowering therapy implementation and tips to overcome them, as well as available evidence on the efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid. We also report an updated therapeutic algorithm for pharmacological LDL-C lowering in view of the introduction of bempedoic acid in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    慢性GvHD(cGvHD)仍然是异基因造血干细胞移植的主要障碍,是非复发死亡率和高发病率的主要原因。在了解病理生理学和开发cGvHD新疗法方面都取得了巨大进展。虽然我们的领域在历史上从经验性的立场接近治疗,在床边和长凳上进行的研究阐明了cGvHD的一些复杂病理生理学。从临床的角度来看,个体患者之间的疾病表现存在显着差异,指向不同的生物基础。利用迄今取得的进展,该领域现在专注于建立个性化的治疗方法。该手稿的目的是简要回顾最近获得的知识,并制定针对患者特异性cGvHD治疗的途径。
    Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) remains a prominent barrier to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantion as the leading cause of nonrelapse mortality and significant morbidity. Tremendous progress has been achieved in both the understanding of pathophysiology and the development of new therapies for cGvHD. Although our field has historically approached treatment from an empiric position, research performed at the bedside and bench has elucidated some of the complex pathophysiology of cGvHD. From the clinical perspective, there is significant variability of disease manifestations between individual patients, pointing to diverse biological underpinnings. Capitalizing on progress made to date, the field is now focused on establishing personalized approaches to treatment. The intent of this article is to concisely review recent knowledge gained and formulate a path toward patient-specific cGvHD therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在婴儿期诊断为髋关节发育不良(DDH)时,保守的管理往往是成功的,有良好的长期结果。在印度,DDH通常直到步行年龄才被诊断出来,并且其筛查指南有限。
    方法:由印度儿科骨科学会成员组成的多学科专家组,印度儿科学会,印度国家新生儿学论坛,印度放射和成像协会,印度医学和生物学超声联合会,印度产科和妇科协会联合会,和印度骨科协会合作制定DDH监测指南.
    目的:通过制定和实施标准化的监测护理途径,提高印度DDH的早期检出率,从而减轻后期出现DDH的负担。
    结论:必须在出生时和免疫访视期间,在6、10和14周;6、9、12、15和18个月大的这些大致时间点对所有婴儿进行常规临床髋关节检查。评估包括对<14周的婴儿进行Ortolani和Barlow测试;对>14周的婴儿进行有限的髋关节外展和腿部长度差异;以及对行走儿童的跛行评估。如果临床检查异常或不确定,建议转诊至骨科进行进一步评估和管理.在巴洛试验阳性但Ortolani试验阴性的小于6周的婴儿中,建议在6周龄时进行髋关节超声检查。还必须对婴儿进行DDH危险因素筛查:臀位表现,DDH家族史,不安全的臀围,和髋关节不稳定在任何以前的临床检查。在有危险因素但临床检查正常的婴儿中,进一步评估应包括对14周龄以下的婴儿进行不早于6周龄的超声检查,14周至6月龄婴儿的超声或X线检查,6个月以上婴儿的X光片。如果放射学检查异常,建议转诊给整形外科医生。
    BACKGROUND: When developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is diagnosed during infancy, conservative management is often successful, with good long-term outcomes. In India, DDH is often not diagnosed until walking age and there are limited guidelines for its screening.
    METHODS: A multidisciplinary Expert Group consisting of members of the Paediatric Orthopaedic Society of India, Indian Academy of Pediatrics, National Neonatology Forum of India, Indian Radiological and Imaging Association, Indian Federation of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India, and Indian Orthopaedic Association worked collaboratively to develop surveillance guidelines for DDH.
    OBJECTIVE: To enhance the early detection rate of DDH in India through development and implementation of a standardized surveillance care pathway, thus reducing the burden of late-presenting DDH.
    CONCLUSIONS: Routine clinical hip examinations must be performed on all infants at birth and during immunization visits at these approximate time points: 6, 10, and 14 weeks; 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 months of age. Assessments include Ortolani and Barlow tests for infants <14 weeks; limited hip abduction and leg length discrepancy for infants >14 weeks; and evaluation of limp in walking children. If clinical examination is abnormal or inconclusive, referral to orthopedics for further evaluation and management is recommended. In infants younger than 6 weeks with positive Barlow test but negative Ortolani test, hip ultrasound is recommended at 6 weeks of age. Infants must also be screened for DDH risk factors: breech presentation, family history of DDH, unsafe hip swaddling, and hip instability at any previous clinical examination. In infants with risk factors but normal clinical examination, further evaluation should include ultrasound taken no earlier than 6 weeks of age for infants younger than 14 weeks, ultrasound or X-ray for infants 14 weeks to 6 months of age, and X-ray for infants older than 6 months. Referral to an orthopedic surgeon is recommended if radiological tests are abnormal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Heart failure (HF) is a common cause of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Despite advances in treatment, the prognosis remains poor. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors decrease HF events by 27-39% in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Moreover, the DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced studies randomized patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with or without diabetes mellitus to receive guideline-directed medical therapy versus guideline-directed medical therapy plus an SGLT-2 inhibitor. Both studies showed the benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors. In addition, SGLT-2 inhibitors have shown improvement according to the EMPEROR-Preserved study of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Therefore, a panel of cardiology experts from the Egyptian Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology Association (EAVA) revised the literature for SGLT-2 inhibitors in HF, along with the recommended indications and contraindications, and this article presents their consensus on the topic. The panel concluded that SGLT-2 inhibitors have significantly benefited patients with chronic HFrEF, as indicated through the DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced trials. The panel recommended early use of dapagliflozin 10 mg or empagliflozin 10 mg in patients with symptomatic chronic HFrEF, whether diabetic or non-diabetic, to ameliorate HF hospitalization rate, mortality, symptoms, and decline in renal function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的十年里,直接口服抗凝药(DOAC)已进入不同专家的临床实践,用于预防非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者的心源性卒中以及预防和治疗静脉血栓栓塞(VTE).由于DOAC在日常临床场景中的使用存在持续的不确定性,临床试验中没有充分探索,我们就意大利动脉粥样硬化认为有趣的问题进行了全国德尔菲共识,血栓形成和血管生物学(ATBV)研究组涉及:(i)老年和/或虚弱患者;(ii)慢性肾病;(iii)药物-药物相互作用;(iv)较低剂量和安全性;(v)选择单独药物和依从性的标准;(vi)癌症患者的VTE。84名意大利临床医生(心脏病专家,内科医生,老年病学家,神经学家和血液学家)使用5点Likert量表(1:非常不一致,2:不同意,3:部分协议,4:协议,5:非常同意)。特别是,1-2选择被认为是不一致,而3-5个选择被认为是一致的。参与者之间对每个陈述的≥66%的同意被认为是共识。总的来说,我们的倡议产生了对DOAC使用方法的广泛和普遍的认识和分享,特别是他们在老年人口和体弱患者或肾功能不全或肿瘤患者中的优先适应症,始终遵循处方适应症和剂量减少标准。意识到药物-药物相互作用的重要性也得到了一致的强调,以及在多重治疗患者中治疗的简单性。鉴于持续存在,尽管有限(12%),在某些问题上缺乏共识,关于虚弱的病人,药物-食物相互作用和解毒剂的可获得性,尽管如此,仍表明获得了进一步的证据和持续的教育努力。
    In the last decade, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have entered the clinical practice of different specialists for the prevention of cardioembolic stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Owing to the persistent uncertainties about the use of DOACs in daily clinical scenarios not fully explored in the clinical trials, we conducted a national Delphi consensus regarding issues deemed interesting by the Italian Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology (ATBV) Study Group in relation to: (i) elderly and/or frail patients; (ii) chronic kidney disease; (iii) drug-drug interactions; (iv) lower doses and safety; (v) criteria for choosing individual drugs and compliance; (vi) VTE in the cancer patient. Eighty-four Italian clinicians (cardiologists, internists, geriatricians, neurologists and hematologists) expressed their level of agreement on each statement using a 5-point Likert scale (1: very much in disagreement, 2: disagreement, 3: partial agreement, 4: agreement, 5: very much in agreement). In particular, 1-2 selections were considered as disagreement, while 3-5 selections were considered as agreement. A ≥66% agreement between the participants for each statement was considered consensus. In general, a broad and general awareness and sharing of the methods of use of DOACs emerged from our initiative, and in particular their preferential indication in the elderly population and in frail patients or with renal insufficiency or oncological, always following the prescription indications and dose reduction criteria. The importance of being aware of drug-drug interactions has also been underlined in a concordant way, as well as simplicity of treatment in the multi-treated patient. In view of the persistent, albeit limited (12%), absence of consensus on some issues, with regard to the frail patient, drug-food interactions and availability of antidote, the acquisition of further evidence and a persistent educational effort are nonetheless indicated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin malignancy afflicting modern Australian society. The most influential response to rising BCC incidence rates has been through public health primary prevention campaigns (PPC) which have persevered since the 1980s. These campaigns are widely heralded a success but clinical data quantifying these benefits are limited due to an absence of legislation around BCC reporting. A non-systematic search of the literature was conducted identifying articles investigating the incidence and clinical characteristics of BCC over the past 40 years, as well as the economic viability of the PPC. There is robust evidence supporting stabilizing rates of BCC incidence in Australia. Similarly, multiple studies have shown the economic benefits of PPC through cost analysis. Anatomical and histological data are reported inconsistently, consequently limiting analysis of changes in BCC clinical characteristics. The consensus throughout the literature is that BCC is a significant public health issue that requires legislative reform. This narrative literature review serves to highlight the need for statutory changes around non-melanocytic skin cancer data collection to enable appropriate analysis and evaluation of current management strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:国际共识标准(ICC)根据三个维度重新定义了胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)的临界可切除性:解剖(BR-A),生物(BR-B),和条件(BR-C)。本定义承认可切除性不仅与肿瘤和血管之间的解剖关系有关,而且生物学和条件尺寸也很重要。
    方法:患者的肿瘤根据ICC进行回顾性定义为临界可切除。将研究队列分为BR-A或BR-B,并与认为主要可切除的患者(R)进行比较。术后并发症的差异,病理报告,总体(OS),评估无病生存率。
    结果:共有345例患者接受了PDAC切除术。通过在常规术前评估中应用ICC,30例患者分为BR-A期,62例患者分为BR-B期。总的来说,253例患者被认为是R。该队列不包含BR-C患者。术后并发症无差异。与R(20个月)患者相比,BR-A(15个月)和BR-B(12个月)的中位OS明显缩短(BR-A与R:p=0.09和BR-Bvs.R:p<0.001)。CA19-9作为BR-B患者的决定因素,被证明是OS的独立预后危险因素。
    结论:根据ICC定义PDAC手术可切除性的术前分期对患者生存至关重要。PDACBR-B患者应考虑进行多模式新辅助治疗,即使考虑解剖可切除。
    BACKGROUND: International consensus criteria (ICC) have redefined borderline resectability for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) according to three dimensions: anatomical (BR-A), biological (BR-B), and conditional (BR-C). The present definition acknowledges that resectability is not just about the anatomic relationship between the tumour and vessels but that biological and conditional dimensions also are important.
    METHODS: Patients\' tumours were retrospectively defined borderline resectable according to ICC. The study cohort was grouped into either BR-A or BR-B and compared with patients considered primarily resectable (R). Differences in postoperative complications, pathological reports, overall (OS), and disease-free survival were assessed.
    RESULTS: A total of 345 patients underwent resection for PDAC. By applying ICC in routine preoperative assessment, 30 patients were classified as stage BR-A and 62 patients as stage BR-B. In total, 253 patients were considered R. The cohort did not contain BR-C patients. No differences in postoperative complications were detected. Median OS was significantly shorter in BR-A (15 months) and BR-B (12 months) compared with R (20 months) patients (BR-A vs. R: p = 0.09 and BR-B vs. R: p < 0.001). CA19-9, as the determining factor of BR-B patients, turned out to be an independent prognostic risk factor for OS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative staging defining surgical resectability in PDAC according to ICC is crucial for patient survival. Patients with PDAC BR-B should be considered for multimodal neoadjuvant therapy even if considered anatomically resectable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Control of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) in cattle populations across most of the world has remained elusive in spite of advances in knowledge about this viral pathogen. A central feature of virus perseverance in cattle herds is the unique mechanism of persistent infection. Managing BVDV infection in herds involves controlling persistently infected carrier animals using a multidimensional approach of vaccination, biosecurity, and identification of BVDV reservoirs. A decade has passed since the original American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus statement on BVDV. While much has remained the same with respect to clinical signs of disease, pathogenesis of infection including persistent infection, and diagnosis, scientific articles published since 2010 have led to a greater understanding of difficulties associated with control of BVDV. This consensus statement update on BVDV presents greater focus on topics currently relevant to the biology and control of this viral pathogen of cattle, including changes in virus subpopulations, infection in heterologous hosts, immunosuppression, and vaccination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号