Second-degree burn is the most common type of burns in clinical practice and hard to manage. At present, there is no unified standard or specification for the first aid, diagnosis, classification, manner of conservative dressing change, and choice of external dressings or medications for second-degree burn wounds, which significantly affects the formulation of clinical treatment plans and the consistency of clinical studies. The consensus writing group developed the Expert consensus on the treatment of second-degree burn wounds (2024 edition)Ⅰ: pre-hospital first aid and non-surgical treatment based on evidence-based medicine evidence and expert opinion. This expert consensus put forward 29 specific recommendations from 2 aspects: pre-hospital first aid and non-surgical treatment for second-degree burn wounds, aiming to form a standardized clinical treatment plan for second-degree burn wounds.
Ⅱ度烧伤是临床中最为常见但处理十分棘手的烧伤类型。目前关于Ⅱ度烧伤创面的急救、诊断、分类、保守换药的方式、外用敷料或药物的选择等尚未形成统一的标准和规范，严重影响临床治疗方案的制订及临床研究开展的一致性。本共识编写组以循证医学证据为基础，结合专家意见，制订《Ⅱ度烧伤创面治疗专家共识（2024版）Ⅰ：院前急救和非手术治疗》。本共识从Ⅱ度烧伤创面的早期急救和非手术治疗2个方面提出29条具体推荐意见，旨在形成规范的Ⅱ度烧伤创面临床治疗方案。.

As one of the three major debridement procedures in burn surgery, eschar dermabrasion is optimal to manage fresh deep partial-thickness burn wounds. Despite decades\' application in clinic, considerable discrepancies exist in various units on the timing, instruments, procedures, selection of post-operative dressings, and patterns of post-operative dressing change, etc., leading to inconsistent clinical outcomes. After thorough review of relative literature, screening and analysis of high-level evidence articles and multiple in-depth discussions, the expert team of Chinese Burn Association has formed an instructional expert consensus, hoping to provide scientific and standardized guidance for application of eschar dermabrasion in burn wounds.
磨痂术作为烧伤外科三大清创术式之一，适用于处理以深Ⅱ度为主的新鲜烧伤创面。尽管该术式已在临床应用多年，但各单位应用该术式的时机、器具、步骤、术后敷料选择以及术后换药方式等仍有较大不同，造成临床效果参差不齐。中华医学会烧伤外科学分会专家组通过查阅相关文献，筛选分析高级别证据文章，多次深入讨论后，形成具有指导意义的专家共识，以期为磨痂术在烧伤创面的临床应用提供科学、规范的指导。.

The growing demand from patients with wounds from various causes has significantly challenged primary care nurses. A chatbot, with duly validated evidence-based content, can assist both nurses and patients in managing care. This work describes the development process of such a chatbot (BOTCURATIVO) that aims to help the treatment of wounds by non-specialists, by giving guidelines about the recommended wound dressing procedures for each type of wound.
Methodological research was carried out in three phases. The first one corresponded to the validation of the script\'s content through a panel of enterostomal therapist nurses, who evaluated the domains and items of the chatbot script. Data analysis was performed using the Content Validity Index by individual level and scale level (≥ 0.80). To verify the agreement between the evaluators, the Kappa test was used. In the second phase, the chatbot was developed, using GOOGLE\'S DIALOGFLOW platform. Finally, in the third phase, the chatbot\'s usability was analyzed using the System Usability Scale (SUS), by 17 users, 8 of them being patients with chronic wounds, 5 caregivers of people with acute and chronic wounds and 4 nurses.
The established domains achieved excellent suitability, relevance and representativeness criteria, all above 90 %; the content validity index per level of scale reached 0.97 and 0.82 by the methods of average and universal agreement, respectively, with excellent agreement between the evaluators (Kappa value: 0.83). The global usability score was 80.1.
The script developed and incorporated into the chatbot prototype achieved a satisfactory level of content validity. The usability of the chatbot was considered good, adding to the credibility of the device.

Skin ulcers in Werner\'s syndrome often arise from hyperkeratotic lesions and trauma to pressure points such as the plantar region, and are more difficult to treat than wound healing in healthy individuals. Multiple factors contribute to the intractable skin ulcers in Werner\'s syndrome, including skin thinning, sclerosis, fatty tissue loss, impaired blood flow, calcification, and excessive pressure due to osteoarticular deformity. Treatment includes topical application of a keratolytic agent for keratosis around the ulcer. Treatment of ulcers is the same as for normal ulcers, and if the ulcer is associated with infection and necrotic tissue, surgical debridement with a scalpel or scissors should be performed as much as possible after washing with saline or mildly warm water or with an antibacterial agent. Topical medications that promote softening and debridement of the necrotic tissue are used with careful control of moisture in the wound. Topical agents that promote granulation should be used in wounds where necrotic tissue has been removed without infection. Dressings to maintain a moist environment in the wound may also be useful. If the wound does not improve with conservative treatment, surgical treatment should be considered. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2021; 21: 160-162.

This is the first collaborative Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society guideline for optimal perioperative care for vulvar and vaginal surgeries. An Embase and PubMed database search of publications was performed. Studies on each topic within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery vulvar and vaginal outline were selected, with emphasis on meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective cohort studies. All studies were reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. All recommendations on the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery topics are based on the best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented.

The Japanese Dermatological Association prepared the clinical guidelines for the \"Wound, pressure ulcer and burn guidelines\", second edition, focusing on treatments. Among them, \"Guidelines for wounds in general\" is intended to provide the knowledge necessary to heal wounds, without focusing on particular disorders. It informs the basic principles of wound treatment, before explanations are provided in individual chapters of the guidelines. We updated all sections by collecting references published since the publication of the first edition. In particular, we included new wound dressings and topical medications. Additionally, we added \"Question 6: How should wound-related pain be considered, and what should be done to control it?\" as a new section addressing wound pain, which was not included in the first edition.

\"Wound, pressure ulcer and burn guidelines - 6: Guidelines for the management of burns, second edition\" is revised from the first edition which was published in the Japanese Journal of Dermatology in 2016. The guidelines were drafted by the Wound, Pressure Ulcer and Burn Guidelines Drafting Committee delegated by the Japanese Dermatological Association, and intend to facilitate physicians\' clinical decisions in preventing, diagnosing and treating burn injury. All sections are updated by collecting documents published since the publication of the first edition. Especially, the recommendation levels of dressing materials newly covered by the Japanese national health insurance are mentioned. In addition, the clinical questions (CQ) regarding the initial treatment of electrical (CQ15) and chemical burns (CQ16), and also the use of escharotomy (CQ22), are newly created.

Significance: A systematic approach to develop experts-based recommendations could have a favorable impact on clinical problems characterized by scarce and low-quality evidence as heel pressure ulcers. Recent Advances: A systematic approach was used to conduce a formal consensus initiative. A multidisciplinary panel of experts identified relevant clinical questions, performed a systematic search of the literature, and created a list of statements. GRADE Working Group guidelines were followed. An independent international jury reviewed and voted recommendations for clinical practice. Consent was developed according to Delphi rules and GRADE method was used to attribute grade of strength. Critical Issues: The extensive search of the literature retrieved 42 pertinent articles (26 clinical studies, 7 systematic reviews or meta-analysis, 5 other reviews, 2 consensus-based articles, and 2 in vitro studies). Thirty-five recommendations and statements were created. Only 1 of 35, concerning ankle-brachial pressure index reliability in diabetic patients, was rejected by the panel. No sufficient agreement was achieved on toe brachial index test to rule out the orphan heel syndrome, removing dry eschar in adult patients without vascular impairment, and using an antimicrobial dressing in children with infected heel pressure injuries. Eleven recommendations were approved with a weak grade of strength. Experts strongly endorsed 20 recommendations. Offloading, stages I and II pressure injuries, and referral criteria were areas characterized by higher level of agreement. Future Directions: We believe that the results of our effort could improve practice, especially in areas where clear and shared opinions emerged. Barriers and limits that could hinder implementation are also discussed in the article.

Bromelain-based Enzymatic Debridement has been introduced as an additional concept to the burn surgeon\'s armamentarium and is best indicated for mid-to deep dermal burns with mixed patterns. Increasing evidence has been published focusing on special regions and settings as well as on limitations of Enzymatic Debridement to improve patient care. To better guide Enzymatic Debridement in view of the increasing experience, there is a need to update the formerly published consensus guidelines with user-orientated recommendations, which were last produced in 2017.
A multi-professional expert panel of plastic surgeons and burn care specialists from twelve European centers was convened, to assist in developing current recommendations for best practices with use of Enzymatic Debridement. Consensus statements were based on peer-reviewed publications and clinical relevance, and topics for re-evaluation and refinement were derived from the formerly published European guidelines. For consensus agreement, the methodology employed was an agreement algorithm based on a modification of the Willy and Stellar method. For this study on Enzymatic Debridement, consensus was considered when there was at least 80 % agreement to each statement.
The updated consensus guidelines from 2019 refer to the clinical experience and practice patterns of 1232 summarized patient cases treated by the panelists with ED in Europe (2017: 500 cases), reflecting the impact of the published recommendations. Forty-three statements were formulated, addressing the following topics: indications, pain management and anesthesia, large surface treatment, timing of application for various indications, preparation and application, post-interventional wound management, skin grafting, outcome, scar and revision management, cost-effectiveness, patient´s perspective, logistic aspects and training strategies. The degree of consensus was remarkably high, with consensus in 42 out of 43 statements (97.7%). A classification with regard to timing of application for Enzymatic Debridement was introduced, discriminating immediate/very early (≤12 h), early (12-72 h) or delayed (>72 h) treatment. All further recommendations are addressed in the publication.
The updated guidelines in this publication represent further refinement of the recommended indication, application and post-interventional management for the use of ED. The published statements contain detailed, user-orientated recommendations aiming to align current and future users and prevent pitfalls, e.g. for the successful implementation of ED in further countries like the USA. The significance of this work is reflected by the magnitude of patient experience behind it, larger than the total number of patients treated in all published ED clinical trials.

暂无摘要。