暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Several treatment options for acne vulgaris are limited by their associated adverse effects. An innovative approach involves introducing light-absorbing nanoparticles into sebaceous follicles before destroying the follicles using selective photothermolysis. We aimed to investigate efficient methods for introducing gold and platinum nanoparticles into sebaceous follicles and to identify suitable laser equipment and parameters for the effective destruction of these follicles.
METHODS: We used porcine skin as the experimental model. We compared the efficacies of a thulium laser, ultrasound, and manual massage and evaluated the optimal method for delivering nanoparticles in close proximity to sebaceous follicles. Subsequently, a 1064-nm-wavelength neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) laser was employed to induce selective photothermolysis. We compared different parameters to identify the optimal pulse duration and fluence of the Nd: YAG laser. The extent of penetration and destruction of sebaceous follicles was assessed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, and a numerical evaluation was conducted.
RESULTS: H&E staining showed that irradiation with a long-pulsed Nd: YAG laser following a combination of thulium laser and sonophoresis effectively destroyed sebaceous follicles, with destruction rates exceeding 50%. These results were valid with a long pulse duration and a high fluence of the Nd: YAG laser.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that sebaceous follicles can be effectively destroyed through a mixture of gold and platinum nanoparticle delivery by a combination of microchanneling and sonophoresis, followed by selective thermal damage induced by a 1064-nm long-pulsed high-fluence Nd: YAG laser.

BACKGROUND: Prior research has explored the relationship between inflammatory skin disorders and breast cancer (BC), yet the causality of this association remains uncertain.
METHODS: Utilizing a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, this study aimed to elucidate the causal dynamics between various inflammatory skin conditions-namely acne, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis vulgaris, urticaria, and rosacea-and BC. Genetic variants implicated in these disorders were sourced from comprehensive genome-wide association studies representative of European ancestry. In the forward MR, BC was posited as the exposure, while the reverse MR treated each inflammatory skin disease as the exposure. A suite of analytical methodologies, including random effects inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median (WME), and MR-Egger, were employed to probe the causative links between inflammatory skin diseases and BC. Sensitivity analyses, alongside evaluations for heterogeneity and pleiotropy, were conducted to substantiate the findings.
RESULTS: The MR analysis revealed an increased risk of acne associated with BC (IVW: OR = 1.063, 95% CI = 1.011-1.117, p = 0.016), while noting a decreased risk of atopic dermatitis (AD) in BC patients (IVW: OR = 0.941, 95% CI = 0.886-0.999, p = 0.047). No significant associations were observed between BC and psoriasis vulgaris, urticaria, or rosacea. Conversely, reverse MR analyses detected no effect of BC on the incidence of inflammatory skin diseases. The absence of pleiotropy and the consistency of these outcomes strengthen the study\'s conclusions.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate an elevated incidence of acne and a reduced incidence of AD in individuals with BC within the European population.

UNASSIGNED: Photopneumatic devices combine gentle vacuum with pulsed broadband light to treat acne. This seven-week, open-label, single-group study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a photopneumatic device as acne monotherapy.
UNASSIGNED: Male and female subjects between the ages of 12 and 40 years with any Fitzpatrick Skin Phototype were enrolled (N=30). Subjects had facial acne and a baseline Investigator\'s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 2 (mild) or 3 (moderate), with ≥10 to ≤50 inflammatory lesions, ≥10 but ≤100 non-inflammatory lesions, and ≤1 facial nodule. The primary efficacy endpoints were change in baseline lesion counts and the percentage of subjects achieving a ≥1-grade reduction IGA Score at Day 49. Secondary efficacy endpoints included changes in Acne Quality of Life, self-assessment, and satisfaction scores. Adverse events and tolerability were assessed.
UNASSIGNED: Inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion counts significantly decreased at all time points versus baseline (for each, p<0.001); IGA scores were improved from baseline at most timepoints and 66.7 percent (20/30) achieved ≥1-grade IGA reduction at Day 49 (p<0.001). Consistent improvements in Acne Self-assessment, Acne-specific Quality of Life, and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaires were reported. All subjects had favorable investigator and subject tolerability assessments.
UNASSIGNED: This study was limited by its small sample size and open-label study design.
UNASSIGNED: Photopneumatic monotherapy significantly reduced acne lesions and resulted in clearer skin in all Fitzpatrick skin types. Adverse events were minor and subject satisfaction was favorable. Customizable energy and vacuum device settings makes the photopneumatic therapy device unique, allowing for a tailored individual approach to treating mild-to-moderate acne.
UNASSIGNED: NCT06043102 (clinicaltrials.gov).

UNASSIGNED: Acne vulgaris, a chronic inflammatory skin condition predominantly seen in teenagers, impacts more than 640 million people worldwide. The potential use of lipid-lowering medications as a treatment for acne vulgaris remains underexplored. This study seeks to investigate the impact of lipid-lowering therapies on the risk of developing acne vulgaris using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.
UNASSIGNED: The two-sample MR method was employed for analysis, and information on lipid-lowering drugs was obtained from the DrugBank and ChEMBL databases. The summary data for blood low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and triglycerides were sourced from the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium, while genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data for acne vulgaris were obtained from the FinnGen database. Heterogeneity was examined using the Q-test, horizontal pleiotropy was assessed using MR-Presso, and the robustness of analysis results was evaluated using leave-one-out analysis.
UNASSIGNED: The MR analysis provided robust evidence for an association between lowering LDL cholesterol through two drug targets and acne vulgaris, with PCSK9 showing an odds ratio (OR) of 1.782 (95%CI: 1.129-2.812, p = 0.013) and LDL receptor (LDLR) with an OR of 1.581 (95%CI: 1.071-2.334, p = 0.021). Similarly, targeting the lowering of triglycerides through lipoprotein lipase (LPL) was significantly associated with an increased risk of acne vulgaris, indicated by an OR of 1.607 (95%CI: 1.124-2.299, p = 0.009).
UNASSIGNED: The current MR study presented suggestive evidence of a positive association between drugs targeting three genes (PCSK9, LDLR, and LPL) to lower lipids and a reduced risk of acne vulgaris.

Acne scarring results from a common inflammatory condition present in many people. These scars can have an impact on quality of life by influencing self-esteem and social acceptance. Current acne scarring treatments, such as chemical peels and laser treatments, often have limited success due to their time-consuming nature and the variability of acne scar types. The subcision technique has shown promise for the treatment of rolling acne scars. There are few studies to date that examine the effects of multiple subcision treatments on rolling acne scars. We evaluated whether the use of multiple subcision treatments improved the appearance of rolling acne scars compared to no treatment. Five patients with rolling acne scars on both sides of their face who met inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. One side of the face was randomized to receive treatment, while the contralateral side of the face received no treatment. Subjects underwent five sequential subcision treatments, spaced 4 weeks apart, with two follow-up visits at weeks 20 and 36 from the 1st treatment. Photographs were taken before and after the initial treatment visit and at each subsequent visit. Acne scar appearance was evaluated by the subject, a blinded live rater, and two double-blinded dermatologist raters. Evaluations of treatment outcomes involved overall acne scar appearance on a 5-point scale, acne scar improvement on a percentage scale, a modified quantitative global scarring grading system, and potential treatment side effects. There was a greater decrease in global scarring scores in the multiple subcision side compared to the control side. There was a greater difference in the average acne scar appearance scores between the Week 36 follow-up visit and baseline for the multiple subcision side compared to that of the control side. 50% of patients reported being more satisfied with the treatment side compared to the control side in regard to overall improvement. The study results suggest that multiple subcision treatments may improve the appearance of rolling acne scars compared to no treatment.

Therapeutic options for acne scars include subcision and suction with microdermabrasion, but these treatment modalities have not been studied in conjunction. To compare effectiveness of subcision alone versus subcision with suction for the treatment of facial acne scars. Randomized, split-faced, evaluator-blinded control trial. Participants underwent one subcision treatment on both sides of the face followed by 10 sessions of suction to one side. Photographs at baseline, 1-month, and 4-months were assessed. Primary outcome measures were the validated Acne Scar Severity Scale (ASSS) (0 = no acne scarring, 4 = severe), Acne Scar Improvement Grading Scale (ASIGS) (-100 to 100%), and modified Quantitative Global Scarring Grades (QGSG) (point-based questionnaire instrument), as well as subject preference. Twenty-eight treatment areas and 154 treatments were analyzed. Dermatologist raters found no differences between subcision alone and subcision-suction at 1-month or 4-months. Mean subject-assessed percent improvement for subcision-suction was higher than that for subcision alone at 1-month (37% versus 24%, p = 0.04) but not at 4-months (p = 0.37). Subjects preferred combination therapy to monotherapy at 1-month (50% vs. 21%) and 4-months (43% vs. 21%). While blinded raters did not detect significant differences, subjects perceived combination treatment as working more quickly than monotherapy, and preferred combination treatment at all time points.Clinical trial registration NCT01696513 on Clinicaltrials.gov.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a common skin disease prevalent in skin of color patients. Studies have demonstrated that dapsone gel, 7.5% (Aczone) used once daily is effective, safe, and well-tolerated for the treatment of acne in both men and women. However, minimal data are available in skin of color populations. This single-center, open-label clinical study investigated the efficacy and safety of dapsone gel, 7.5% in the treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI.
METHODS: Twenty (20) adult subjects with moderate to severe acne and Fitzpatrick skin types IV-VI were enrolled in this study and treated with dapsone gel, 7.5% once daily for 24 weeks.
RESULTS: Dapsone gel, 7.5% applied daily for 24 weeks reduced acne severity, post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, and decreased new inflammatory and noninflammatory acne lesions in skin of color patients with moderate to severe acne vulgaris. Treatment resulted in improved acne health-related quality of life and patient symptoms related to acne, including patient-reported post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, especially with a treatment duration of 18 weeks or longer.  Limitations: The sample size was small and underpowered to detect statistically significant changes in some endpoints.
CONCLUSIONS: Dapsone gel 7.5% was safe, well-tolerated, and efficacious in treating acne vulgaris and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation in skin-of-color patients. Larger studies involving skin-of-color populations with acne vulgaris are warranted. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):410-417. doi:10.36849/JDD.7897.

UNASSIGNED: Acne vulgaris (AV) is a common inflammatory skin condition associated with psychological and social distress. Its pathogenesis involves factors such as sebaceous hypersecretion and Cutibacterium acnes colonization. Vitamin D plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of various inflammatory skin disorders, including AV, due to its immunomodulatory effects and involvement in keratinocyte growth and maturity. However, adequate sun exposure is required for optimal vitamin D synthesis. Isotretinoin (IOS), a vitamin A derivative, is a commonly used medication for severe acne, acting by binding to retinoid receptors. It can also form heterodimers with vitamin D receptors, potentially increasing vitamin D catabolism. Previous studies examining the impact of oral IOS on serum vitamin D levels have yielded inconsistent results. Therefore, this study aimed to assess changes in 25-hydroxy (OH) vitamin D serum levels in individuals with severe AV before and after IOS treatment.
UNASSIGNED: One hundred patients with severe AV were enrolled, each receiving 0.75 mg/kg IOS treatment daily for 4 months. Serum 25 OH vitamin D levels were measured before, during, and after treatment.
UNASSIGNED: This study found a significant increase in serum 25 OH vitamin D levels among patients with severe AV following IOS treatment (p < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: This study suggests that AV may negatively impact vitamin D synthesis, but IOS treatment appears to raise vitamin D serum levels in individuals with severe AV. Further research is needed to confirm the potential relationship between AV and vitamin D levels.

BACKGROUND: Severe acne breakouts often lead to atrophic acne scars, which affect millions of people worldwide and can significantly affect a person\'s self-confidence and self-image. Given the difficulty in treating atrophic acne scars, this study aims to investigate the efficacy of topical phenytoin in the treatment of atrophic acne scars.
METHODS: This split face clinical trial on 25 patients between the ages of 18 and 40 involved the application of microneedling on one side of the face, with three sessions taking place over the course of a month. On the other side, a 1% phenytoin cream was administered three times daily for 1 week following the microneedling procedure. Baseline information was collected for all patients, and follow-up assessments were conducted during the treatment sessions and 2 months after the last session. The assessments included evaluating the number and area of pores and spots, determining scar severity, assessing patient satisfaction, and recording any potential complications.
RESULTS: Among patients, 20 individuals (80%) were females, and the average age of the participants was 35.96 ± 9.23. In terms of the fine pore area, despite the fine pore count, both groups showed improvement over time (p: 0.03 vs. 0.06). Also, regarding large pore count and area, and the count and area of spots, both groups showed improvement over time (p: 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). On the other hand, when it comes to acne scar grade and patients\' satisfaction, the phenytoin group outperformed the control group in all follow-up sessions and this difference was found to be significant (p: 0.001). It is worth noting that no complications were observed among any of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: It appears that combining phenytoin cream with microneedling has a more effective therapeutic outcome in enhancing atrophic acne scars, when compared to microneedling alone, and this method can be regarded as a viable alternative in treating these types of scars.