PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
To characterize quantitative studies on coaching interventions for professional surgeons to understand how surgical coaching is defined; examine how different coaching programs are designed, implemented, and evaluated; and identify any relevant research gaps.
UNASSIGNED: Surgical coaching is gaining attention as an approach that could help surgeons optimize performance and improve overall wellbeing. However, surgical coaching programs and definitions of coaching vary widely between studies.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP was conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR framework to identify studies and registered clinical trials written in English. Original quantitative studies on coaching interventions for professional surgeons were included. Characteristics of the coachees, coaching programs, study designs, outcomes, and findings were charted and analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: From 2589 references, 8 studies (6 published; 2 registered trials) met inclusion criteria. Published studies targeted technical or nontechnical skills, included 2-26 surgeons as coachees, and used coaches who were surgeons. Two studies demonstrated that surgeons react positively to coaching. Studies showed inconsistent effects on technical/nontechnical skills. Only two studies measured patient adverse events and reported no significant positive impacts. The registered randomized trials targeted surgeons\' physiological parameters or wellbeing and used professional coaches. These trials measure surgeon and patient outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: There is an emerging interest in coaching programs to improve surgeons\' performance by targeting their professional skills and personal factors. However, more randomized trials are needed to evaluate the impact of coaching interventions on patient outcomes and surgeon wellness.
UNASSIGNED: Surgical coaching is gaining attention as an approach that could help surgeons optimize performance and improve overall wellbeing. However, surgical coaching programs and definitions of coaching vary widely between studies.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP was conducted according to the PRISMA-ScR framework to identify studies and registered clinical trials written in English. Original quantitative studies on coaching interventions for professional surgeons were included. Characteristics of the coachees, coaching programs, study designs, outcomes, and findings were charted and analyzed.
UNASSIGNED: From 2589 references, 8 studies (6 published; 2 registered trials) met inclusion criteria. Published studies targeted technical or nontechnical skills, included 2-26 surgeons as coachees, and used coaches who were surgeons. Two studies demonstrated that surgeons react positively to coaching. Studies showed inconsistent effects on technical/nontechnical skills. Only two studies measured patient adverse events and reported no significant positive impacts. The registered randomized trials targeted surgeons\' physiological parameters or wellbeing and used professional coaches. These trials measure surgeon and patient outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: There is an emerging interest in coaching programs to improve surgeons\' performance by targeting their professional skills and personal factors. However, more randomized trials are needed to evaluate the impact of coaching interventions on patient outcomes and surgeon wellness.
摘要：
描述专业外科医生教练干预措施的定量研究，以了解如何定义手术教练;检查如何设计不同的教练计划，已实施，并进行评估；并确定任何相关的研究差距。
UNASSIGNED：外科教练作为一种可以帮助外科医生优化表现和改善整体健康的方法，正在引起人们的关注。然而,不同研究之间的外科指导计划和指导定义差异很大.
未经授权：PubMed的系统文献检索，Scopus,WebofScience,中部,clinicaltrials.gov,和世卫组织ICTRP是根据PRISMA-ScR框架进行的，以确定以英语编写的研究和注册临床试验。包括对专业外科医生进行指导干预的原始定量研究。焦炭的特点，教练计划，研究设计，结果，并对调查结果进行了图表和分析。
未经评估：来自2589个参考文献，8项研究（6项已发表；2项注册试验）符合纳入标准。发表的研究针对技术或非技术技能，包括2-26名外科医生，并使用了外科医生教练。两项研究表明，外科医生对教练反应积极。研究表明，对技术/非技术技能的影响不一致。只有两项研究测量了患者的不良事件，并报告没有显著的积极影响。注册的随机试验针对外科医生的生理参数或健康状况，并使用专业教练。这些试验测量外科医生和患者的结果。
UNASSIGNED：通过针对外科医生的专业技能和个人因素来提高其表现的教练计划正在引起人们的兴趣。然而,需要更多的随机试验来评估指导干预措施对患者预后和外科医生健康的影响.
UNASSIGNED：外科教练作为一种可以帮助外科医生优化表现和改善整体健康的方法，正在引起人们的关注。然而,不同研究之间的外科指导计划和指导定义差异很大.
未经授权：PubMed的系统文献检索，Scopus,WebofScience,中部,clinicaltrials.gov,和世卫组织ICTRP是根据PRISMA-ScR框架进行的，以确定以英语编写的研究和注册临床试验。包括对专业外科医生进行指导干预的原始定量研究。焦炭的特点，教练计划，研究设计，结果，并对调查结果进行了图表和分析。
未经评估：来自2589个参考文献，8项研究（6项已发表；2项注册试验）符合纳入标准。发表的研究针对技术或非技术技能，包括2-26名外科医生，并使用了外科医生教练。两项研究表明，外科医生对教练反应积极。研究表明，对技术/非技术技能的影响不一致。只有两项研究测量了患者的不良事件，并报告没有显著的积极影响。注册的随机试验针对外科医生的生理参数或健康状况，并使用专业教练。这些试验测量外科医生和患者的结果。
UNASSIGNED：通过针对外科医生的专业技能和个人因素来提高其表现的教练计划正在引起人们的兴趣。然而,需要更多的随机试验来评估指导干预措施对患者预后和外科医生健康的影响.
