METHODS: A three-arm, parallel, stratified cluster randomized design will be used to evaluate the effect of two interventions compared to control: control involves the usual practice of provision of MRDT services by public primary healthcare providers and patent medicine vendors; social group intervention involves the sensitization/education of social groups about MRDT; social group/provider intervention involves social group treatment plus the training of healthcare providers in health communication about MRDT with clients. The primary outcome is the proportion of children under 5 years of age with fever/malaria-like illness, in the 2 weeks preceding a household survey, who received MRDT. The co-primary outcome is the proportion of children ages 5 years and above and adults (excluding pregnant women) with fever/malaria-like illness, in the 2 weeks preceding a household survey, who received MRDT. The primary outcome will be assessed through household surveys at baseline and at the end of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: The pragmatic and behavioural nature of the interventions delivered to groups of individuals and the need to minimize contamination informed the use of a cluster-randomized design in this study in investigating whether the social group and social group/provider interventions will increase the demand for MRDT among community members. \"Pragmatic\" means the interventions would occur in natural settings or real- life situations.
BACKGROUND: ISRCTN, ISRCTN14046444 . Registered on 14 August 2018.
方法:三臂,平行,与对照相比,将使用分层集群随机设计来评估两种干预措施的效果:对照涉及公共初级医疗保健提供者和专利药物供应商提供MRDT服务的常规做法;社会团体干预涉及对社会团体进行MRDT的敏感性/教育;社会团体/提供者干预涉及社会团体治疗以及对医疗保健提供者与客户进行MRDT健康沟通的培训。主要结果是5岁以下儿童患有发烧/疟疾样疾病的比例,在家庭调查前的两周,接受MRDT的人。共同主要结果是5岁及以上的儿童和患有发烧/疟疾样疾病的成年人(不包括孕妇)的比例,在家庭调查前的两周,接受MRDT的人。主要结果将在基线和研究结束时通过家庭调查进行评估。
结论:对个体群体的干预措施的实际和行为性质,以及减少污染的需要,在本研究中使用集群随机设计来调查社会群体和社会群体/提供者干预措施是否会增加社区成员对MRDT的需求。“务实”是指干预将发生在自然环境或现实生活中。
背景:ISRCTN,ISRCTN14046444。2018年8月14日注册