PDF(Sci-hub)
Abstract：
We previously demonstrated that people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) can improve their ability to categorize blood glucose (BG) results into low, in range, or high glycemic ranges after experiencing a color range indicator (CRI or ColorSure™ Technology) in a single meter. This study examined whether a CRI was effective in people with type 1 (T1) or T2DM when used in 3 glucose meters.
A total of 179 subjects (139 T2DM and 40 T1DM) classified BG values as low, in range, or high based on individual current knowledge. Subjects then experienced the CRI which showed whether different BG values were low, in range, or high. After CRI interaction, subjects repeated the classification.
Following interaction with the CRI, subjects significantly improved their ability to categorize BG results into low, in range, and high glycemic ranges by 27.9% (T2DM) and 27.2% (T1DM) (each P < .001). Improvement was not accompanied by an increase in time spent categorizing results. There was no difference in classification ability between subjects with T1 or T2DM. There was also no correlation between HbA1c, numeracy level, test frequency, or duration of diabetes and the ability to correctly classify results. Subjects agreed the CRI feature helped them easily interpret glucose values and improved their awareness of glucose ranges.
Interaction with a CRI improved the ability of subjects with T1 and T2DM to interpret and categorize BG values into recommended glycemic ranges, irrespective of the glucose meter providing the CRI insights.
A total of 179 subjects (139 T2DM and 40 T1DM) classified BG values as low, in range, or high based on individual current knowledge. Subjects then experienced the CRI which showed whether different BG values were low, in range, or high. After CRI interaction, subjects repeated the classification.
Following interaction with the CRI, subjects significantly improved their ability to categorize BG results into low, in range, and high glycemic ranges by 27.9% (T2DM) and 27.2% (T1DM) (each P < .001). Improvement was not accompanied by an increase in time spent categorizing results. There was no difference in classification ability between subjects with T1 or T2DM. There was also no correlation between HbA1c, numeracy level, test frequency, or duration of diabetes and the ability to correctly classify results. Subjects agreed the CRI feature helped them easily interpret glucose values and improved their awareness of glucose ranges.
Interaction with a CRI improved the ability of subjects with T1 and T2DM to interpret and categorize BG values into recommended glycemic ranges, irrespective of the glucose meter providing the CRI insights.
摘要：
我们以前证明，2型糖尿病（T2DM）患者可以提高他们将血糖（BG）结果分类为低，在范围内，或在单个仪表中经历颜色范围指示器（CRI或ColorSure™技术）后的高血糖范围。这项研究检查了CRI在3个血糖仪中使用时是否对1型（T1）或T2DM患者有效。
总共179名受试者（139名T2DM和40名T1DM）将BG值分类为低，在范围内，或基于个人当前知识的高。然后受试者经历了CRI，显示不同的BG值是否低，在范围内，或高。在CRI互动之后，受试者重复分类。
在与CRI互动之后，受试者显著提高了将BG结果分类为低的能力，在范围内，高血糖范围分别为27.9%(T2DM)和27.2%(T1DM)(各P<.001)。改进并没有伴随着对结果进行分类所花费的时间的增加。T1或T2DM受试者之间的分类能力没有差异。HbA1c之间也没有相关性，算术水平，测试频率,或糖尿病的持续时间和正确分类结果的能力。受试者同意CRI特征帮助他们容易地解释葡萄糖值并提高他们对葡萄糖范围的认识。
与CRI的相互作用提高了T1和T2DM患者将BG值解释和分类为推荐的血糖范围的能力。与提供CRI见解的血糖仪无关。
总共179名受试者（139名T2DM和40名T1DM）将BG值分类为低，在范围内，或基于个人当前知识的高。然后受试者经历了CRI，显示不同的BG值是否低，在范围内，或高。在CRI互动之后，受试者重复分类。
在与CRI互动之后，受试者显著提高了将BG结果分类为低的能力，在范围内，高血糖范围分别为27.9%(T2DM)和27.2%(T1DM)(各P<.001)。改进并没有伴随着对结果进行分类所花费的时间的增加。T1或T2DM受试者之间的分类能力没有差异。HbA1c之间也没有相关性，算术水平，测试频率,或糖尿病的持续时间和正确分类结果的能力。受试者同意CRI特征帮助他们容易地解释葡萄糖值并提高他们对葡萄糖范围的认识。
与CRI的相互作用提高了T1和T2DM患者将BG值解释和分类为推荐的血糖范围的能力。与提供CRI见解的血糖仪无关。
