BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is a crucial component of diabetes management, but adherence remains suboptimal. This study aimed to evaluate adherence to SMBG among type 2 diabetic patients in Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 398 type 2 diabetic patients attending primary healthcare centers. Data were collected through face-to-face or virtual interviews and electronic health records. Adherence levels were categorized as low, moderate, and high.
RESULTS: The majority of participants exhibited moderate adherence to SMBG (58.5%), while 27.1% had low adherence, and 14.3% were highly adherent. The use of oral hypoglycemic medications and insulin injections was associated with higher adherence (p<0.001). Comorbidities, physical exercise, diet, frequency of medical visits, and attendance at diabetes education sessions did not significantly influence adherence.
CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal adherence to SMBG was observed among type 2 diabetic patients in Al-Ahsa. Targeted interventions addressing individual barriers and integrating technology may improve SMBG adherence and diabetes management.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the time in range (TIR) obtained from self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) with that obtained from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and explore the relationship of TIR with microalbuminuria outcome, HOMA-IR and HOMA-β test.
METHODS: We recruited 400 patients with type 2 diabetes to carry out blood glucose monitoring by both SMBG and CGM for 3 consecutive days. TIR, TAR, TBR and other blood glucose variation indices were calculated respectively through the glucose data achieved from SMBG and CGM. The HOMA-IR and HOMA-β test was evaluated by an oral glucose tolerance test. Urinary microalbumin-to-creatinine ratio completed in the laboratory.
RESULTS: The median (25 %, 75 % quartile) of TIRCGM and TIRSMBG were 74.94(44.90, 88.04) and 70.83(46.88, 87.50) respectively, and there was no significant difference, p = 0.489; For every 1 % increase in TIRCGM, the risk of microalbuminuria decreased by 1.6 % (95%CI:0.973, 0.995, p = 0.006) and for every 1 % increase in TIRSMBG, the risk of microalbuminuria decreased by 1.3 % (95%CI:0.975, 0.999, p = 0.033). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis showed an independent positive correlation between TIR (including TIRCGM and TIRSBMG) and LnDI30 and LnDI120 levels (p = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: The TIR calculated by SMBG was highly consistent with that reported by CGM and was significantly associated with the risk of microalbuminuria and the HOMA-β. Higher TIR quartiles were associated with lower incidence of microalbuminuria as well as higher lever of HOMA-β. For patients with limited CGM application, SMBG-derived TIR may be an alternative to CGM-derived TIR, to assess blood glucose control.

The incidence, prevalence, mortality, and health expenditure associated with diabetes continue to grow, despite efforts. The use of multianalyte sensors, which detect glucose as well as key analytes such as ketones, lactate, insulin, uric acid, and electrolytes, may provide additional information to guide earlier identification and management of diabetes and its complications. We undertook a narrative review using a systematic approach in May 2023, with a bridge search undertaken in April 2024. Four biomedical databases were searched: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Emcare, and Cochrane Library. Searches for gray literature were conducted on ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, and websites of relevant organizations. Included studies incorporated articles on multianalyte sensors in diabetes and single-analyte sensors proposing integration into multianalyte diabetes management, with no limits placed on publication date and study design. Data were screened and extracted using CovidenceTM software. Overall, 11 articles were included, of which 7 involved multianalyte sensors (involving glucose and other analytes) and 4 single-analyte sensors (measuring non-glucose substances for proposed future integration into multianalyte systems). Analytes examined were ketones (n = 3), lactate (n = 4), uric acid (n = 3), insulin (n = 1), and potassium (n = 1). Results demonstrated that in vitro and in vivo measurements of multi- and single-analyte sensors accurately and reliably corresponded with human capillary and serum samples. While the literature on this topic is sparse, our review demonstrated that measurement of glucose and other analytes can be feasibly undertaken using multi- and single-analyte sensors. More studies in humans are needed to establish clinical utility in diabetes self-management and assist with technological improvements.

UNASSIGNED: To explore the lived experiences of initiating real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rt-CGM) use in individuals with type 2 diabetes using insulin.
UNASSIGNED: Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted amongst individuals with type 2 diabetes taking insulin who were enrolled in the 2GO-CGM randomised controlled trial and had completed 3 months of rtCGM. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed to identify common themes regarding their experiences.
UNASSIGNED: The interviews revealed three key themes: i) rtCGM as a facilitator of improved health behaviours; ii) the acceptability of rtCGM systems compared to capillary blood glucose testing; and iii) barriers to the continual usage of rtCGM technology - including: connection difficulties, longevity of the sensors, and local cutaneous reactions to the sensor adhesive.
UNASSIGNED: Adults on insulin with type 2 diabetes find rtCGM systems widely acceptable, and easier to engage with than traditional self-monitoring of capillary blood glucose.
UNASSIGNED: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01403-9.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine long-term cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology versus self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using multiple daily injections in Iran.
METHODS: According to available data, the long-term costs and clinical outcomes of CGM and SMBG were estimated using the Sheffield Type 1 Diabetes Model, with a lifetime horizon from a payer\'s perspective. The primary outcome was the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.
RESULTS: The lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that on average, the use of CGM increased life expectancy by 1.32 years and QALYs by 1.63, compared with SMBG. The CGM group had an average discounted total cost of $40 093 US dollars, whereas the SMBG group had an average discounted total cost of $13 366. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $16 386 per QALY gained, which is less than the threshold of 3 times the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita of Iran ($24 561).
CONCLUSIONS: Considering 3 times the GDP per capita as the threshold, CGM is likely to be cost-effective in Iran. However, for CGM to be very cost-effective (ie, have an ICER less than 1 times the GDP per capita) and presumably more accessible, the price of CGM should decrease to $40 per sensor, each with a lifespan of 14 days.

To evaluate the association between extrapolated time in range (eTIR), measured by self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants in pregnancies with type 1 diabetes (T1D).
Retrospective cohort analysis including singleton pregnancies with T1D who started antenatal care before 20 gestational weeks and delivered live newborns at a Brazilian hospital between 2010 and 2019, with LGA fetuses as the main outcome. Glycemic records acquired using SMBG were categorized as eTIR, extrapolated time below range (eTBR), and extrapolated time above range (eTAR). Women were divided into two groups (LGA and adequate for gestational age [AGA]) and compared regarding clinical characteristics, obstetric outcomes, and frequencies of eTIR, eTBR, and eTAR. Logistic regression analysis verified the independent predictive variables for LGA infants.
Data from 125 pregnancies were analyzed. For the first, second and third trimesters, each 1 % increase in eTIR was associated with a decreased risk of LGA by 2.9 % (OR: 0.971; 95%CI: 0.945-0.998), 2.5 % (OR: 0.975; 95%CI: 0.951-0.999) and 2.3 % (OR: 0.977; 95%CI: 0.955-0.998) and each 1 % increase in eTAR was associated with an increased risk of LGA by 2.7 % (OR: 1.027; 95%CI: 1.005-1.050), 3.9 % (OR: 1.039; 95%CI: 1.014-1.063) and 4.6 % (OR: 1.046; 95%CI: 1.018-1.075), respectively.
The concept of TIR can be extrapolated to patients undergoing SMBG to assess the risk of LGA infants in pregnant women with T1D.

Introduction: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has shown favorable outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who are on insulin therapy. However, the efficacy of CGM in managing glucose levels in noninsulin-treated people with T2D remains controversial. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CGM to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in people with T2D not using insulin. We computed weighted mean differences (WMDs) and standard mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.2.3. Results: We included six RCTs comprising 407 noninsulin-treated people with T2D of whom 228 were randomized to CGM. Diabetes duration ranged from 5.4 to 13.9 years. The mean age was 57.9 years and the mean body mass index was 30.8 kg/m2. Four trials used real-time CGM (rt-CGM) and two intermittent scanning CGM (is-CGM). Compared with SMBG, CGM significantly reduced the glycated hemoglobin level (WMD -0.31%; 95% CI -0.42 to -0.21; I2 = 0%), glucose level (WMD -11.16 mg/dL; 95% CI -19.94 to -2.39; I2 = 0%), time in hypoglycemia level 2 (WMD -0.28%; 95% CI -0.52 to -0.03; I2 = 91%), glucose time >180 mg/dL (WMD -7.75%; 95% CI -12.04 to -3.45; I2 = 0%), and the standard deviation of glucose variation (WMD -4.00 mg/dL; 95% CI -6.86 to -1.14; I2 = 0%). CGM also increased time in range (WMD 8.63%; 95% CI 4.54-12.71; I2 = 0%) and treatment satisfaction (SMD 0.79; 95% CI 0.54-1.05; I2 = 0%). Conclusion: In this meta-analysis, rt-CGM and is-CGM were associated with improvement in glycemic control in people with T2D not using insulin when compared to SMBG.

OBJECTIVE: A remote platform for diabetes care (Roche Diabetes® Care Platform, RDCP) has been developed that allows combined face-to-face consultations and remote patient monitoring (RPM).
METHODS: A dedicated flowchart is proposed as a clinical approach to help healthcare professionals in the appropriate interpretation of structured self-monitoring blood glucose data, as visualized on the RDCP during the visits, and in the optimal management of patients using the integrated RDCP-RPM tools.
RESULTS: The platform organizes patterns in different blocks: (i) hypoglycemia; (ii) hyperglycemia; (iii) blood glucose variability; (iv) treatment adherence, which identifies a possible individual pattern according to glycemic control challenges, potential causal factors, and behavioral type patterns. The flowchart proposed for use of the RDCP-RPM is self-explanatory and entails 3 steps: (1) evaluation of quality and quantity of self-monitoring blood glucose data; (2) pattern analysis; (3) personalized suggestions and therapy changes.
CONCLUSIONS: The main aim of the remote treatment flowchart proposed is to support healthcare professionals in the identification of hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic patterns using the RDCP regardless of the HbA1c value and ongoing treatment, which however, become crucial in combination with pattern analysis in the therapeutical choice.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) versus self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in maintaining glycaemic control among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
METHODS: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023387583). PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and OVID databases were searched from 1 January 2000 until 31 December 2022 for randomized controlled trials comparing CGM with SMBG in glycaemic control among the outpatients with T2DM. The primary endpoint was glycated haemoglobin, while the secondary endpoints included time in range, time below range and time above range. Both traditional and network meta-analyses were conducted to explore the efficacy of CGM on glycaemic control in T2DM.
RESULTS: Eleven high-quality studies, involving 1425 individuals with T2DM, were identified. Traditional meta-analysis revealed that CGM exhibited a significantly decreased [mean difference (MD): -0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-0.45, -0.18)], time above range [MD: -9.06%, 95% CI (-16.00, -2.11)], time below range [MD: -0.30%, 95% CI (-0.49, -0.12)] and a significantly increased time in range [MD: 8.49%, 95% CI (3.96, 13.02)] compared with SMBG. The network meta-analysis showed that real-time CGM can improve the glycaemic control of patients with T2DM to the most extent.
CONCLUSIONS: CGM could provide T2DM with greater benefits in glycaemic management compared with SMBG, particularly in patients using real-time CGM. These findings provide an updated perspective on previous research and offer guidance for CGM use in T2DM.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes self-management education (DSME) improves glycemic and metabolic control. However, the frequency, duration and sustainability of DSME for improving metabolic control have not been well studied.
METHODS: The Diabetes Share Care Program (DSCP) stage 1 provided DSME every 3 months. If participants entering DSCP stage 1 ≥ 2 years and HbA1c < 7%, they can be transferred to stage 2 (DSME frequency: once a year). Three-to-one matching between DSCP stage 1 and stage 2 groups based on the propensity score method to match the two groups in terms of HbA1c and diabetes duration. We identified 311 people living with type 2 diabetes in DSCP stage 1 and 86 in stage 2 and evaluated their metabolic control and healthy behaviors annually for 5 years.
RESULTS: In the first year, HbA1c in the DSCP stage 2 group was significantly lower than that in the stage 1 group. In the first and the fifth years, the percentage of patients achieving HbA1c < 7% was significantly higher in the DSCP stage 2 group than the stage 1 group. There was no significant difference in other metabolic parameters between the two groups during the 5-year follow-up. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) frequency was associated with a reduced HbA1c after 5 years (95% CI: -0.0665 to -0.0004).
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated sustainable effects of at least 2-year DSME on achieving better glycemic control for at least 1 year. SMBG contributed to improved glycemic control. The results may be applied to the reimbursement strategy in diabetes education.