• DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于过程的教学是一种新的教育模式。SPARK病例数据库是一个免费的医学影像病例数据库。本文旨在探讨基于SPARK病例数据库的过程式教学在肌肉骨骼系统放射学实践教学中的应用。
    方法:纳入117名三年级医学生。他们被分成A组,B,C和D根据课程安排。A组和B组同时参加实验课,A是实验组,B为对照组。C组和D组同时参加实验课,C是实验组,D为对照组。实验组使用SPARK病例数据库,对照组采用传统教学模式进行学习。四组学生分别在理论课结束后进行测试,在实验课之前,实验课之后,和一周后的实验课比较结果。最后,所有学生都使用SPARK案例数据库进行研究,并在实验课后一个月进行了测试,以比较它们的差异。
    结果:A组和B组理论课后的分数为(100.0±25.4),(101.0±23.8)(t=-0.160,P>0.05),C组和D组为(94.7±23.7),(92.1±18.6)(t=0.467,P>0.05)。A组和B组实验班前后和实验班后一周得分分别为(84.1±17.4),(72.1±21.3)(t=2.363,P<0.05),(107.6±14.3),(102.1±18.0)(t=1.292,P>0.05),(89.7±24.3),(66.6±23.2)(t=3.706,P<0.05)。C组和D组评分分别为(94.0±17.3)分,(72.8±25.5)(t=3.755,P<0.05),(107.3±20.3),(93.1±20.9)(t=2.652,P<0.05),(100.3±19.7),(77.2±24.0)(t=4.039,P<0.05)。A组和B组实验班后一个月的成绩为(86.6±28.8),(84.5±24.0)(t=0.297,P>0.05),C组和D组为(95.7±20.3),(91.7±23.0)(t=0.699,P>0.05)。
    结论:基于SPARK病例数据库的过程式教学可以提高学生肌肉骨骼系统的放射学实践能力。
    BACKGROUND: Process-based teaching is a new education model. SPARK case database is a free medical imaging case database. This manuscript aimed to explore the application of the process-based teaching based on SPARK case database in the practice teaching of radiology in the musculoskeletal system.
    METHODS: 117 third year medical students were included. They were divided into Group A, B, C and D according to the curriculum arrangement. Group A and B attended the experimental class at the same time, A was the experimental group, B was the control group. Group C and D attended experimental classes at the same time, C was the experimental group, D was the control group. The experimental group used SPARK case database, while the control group used traditional teaching model for learning. The four groups of students were respectively tested after the theoretical class, before the experimental class, after the experimental class, and one week after the experimental class to compare the results. Finally, all students used SPARK case database to study, and were tested one month after the experimental class to compare their differences.
    RESULTS: The scores after the theoretical class of Group A and B were (100.0 ± 25.4), (101.0 ± 23.8)(t=-0.160, P > 0.05), Group C and D were (94.7 ± 23.7), (92.1 ± 18.6)(t = 0.467, P > 0.05). The scores of Group A and B before and after the experimental class and one week after the experimental class were respectively (84.1 ± 17.4), (72.1 ± 21.3)(t = 2.363, P < 0.05), (107.6 ± 14.3), (102.1 ± 18.0)(t = 1.292, P > 0.05), (89.7 ± 24.3), (66.6 ± 23.2)(t = 3.706, P < 0.05). The scores of Group C and D were (94.0 ± 17.3), (72.8 ± 25.5)(t = 3.755, P < 0.05), (107.3 ± 20.3), (93.1 ± 20.9)(t = 2.652, P < 0.05), (100.3 ± 19.7), (77.2 ± 24.0)(t = 4.039, P < 0.05). The scores of Group A and B for one month after the experimental class were (86.6 ± 28.8), (84.5 ± 24.0)(t = 0.297, P > 0.05), and Group C and D were (95.7 ± 20.3), (91.7 ± 23.0)(t = 0.699, P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The process-based teaching based on SPARK case database could improve the radiology practice ability of the musculoskeletal system of students.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:来自不同国家的研究报告了医学生在学习的第一年和最后一年之间的道德能力停滞或倒退,各种教育干预措施的价值仍然不确定。
    方法:我们使用道德能力测验(MCT)来测量道德能力的C分数,以确定2022/2023学年捷克共和国两所医学院的一年级和五年级医学生之间的MCTC分数变化,并分析与C分数相关的因素(观察性研究)。此外,对于一年级的学生来说,我们比较了医学伦理学课程干预前后的MCT结果(介入研究).我们使用横断面和描述性设计进行观察性研究。学生完成了MCT,由两个道德困境(工人困境和医生困境)组成,用C分数测量的结果,代表道德能力。
    结果:总计,685名学生参加了观察性研究。目的1:通过对C评分的分析,我们观察到一年级和五年级医学生的道德能力下降(p<.001)。目标2:我们没有观察到性别的统计学显着影响(p=0.278),或自我评估的宗教信仰(p=.163)。目的3:在介入研究中,440名学生参加了前测,422名学生参加了后测。统计学显著性检验发现干预后学生的道德能力没有改善(p=.253)。
    结论:医学生在医学教育中表现出道德能力的回归;在医学生的五年级中,这一水平较低,与没有性别影响的一年级医学生相比,或者自我评价的宗教信仰。尽管由多种医学伦理学教学工具组成的教育干预(PBL,CBL,KMDD和StorED)并没有导致道德能力的提高,这种干预的纵向效果还有待观察。
    BACKGROUND: Studies from different countries report a stagnation or regression of moral competence in medical students between the first and the last year of their studies, and the value of various educational interventions remains uncertain.
    METHODS: We used Moral Competence Test (MCT) to measure C-scores of moral competence to determine the change in the MCT C-scores between the first- and the fifth-year medical students from two medical schools in the Czech Republic in the academic year 2022/2023 and to analyze factors associated with the C-scores (observational study). In addition, for the first-year students, we compared the results of the MCT before and after an intervention in medical ethics curriculum (interventional study). We used a cross-sectional and descriptive design for the observational study. Students completed the MCT, consisting of two moral dilemmas (Worker´s Dilemma and Doctor´s Dilemma), the results measured by the C-score, which represents moral competence.
    RESULTS: In total, 685 students participated in the observational study. Objective 1: based on the analysis of the C-score, we observed a decrease in moral competence between the first and the fifth-year medical students (p < .001). Objective 2: we did not observe a statistically significant effect of gender (p = .278), or self-rated religiosity (p = .163). Objective 3: in the interventional study, 440 students participated in the pretest and 422 students participated in the posttest. The test of statistical significance found no improvement in students\' moral competence after the intervention (p = .253).
    CONCLUSIONS: Medical students show a regression in moral competence during medical education; it was lower in medical students in their fifth year, compared to the first-year medical students without the effect of gender, or self-rated religiosity. Although educational intervention consisting of multiple tools of medical ethics teaching (PBL, CBL, KMDD and StorED) did not lead to increase in moral competence, the longitudinal effect of such intervention remains to be seen.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:采用高价值,成本意识护理(HVCCC)原则在医学教育中的重要性日益增加,这是由于全球医疗保健成本飙升以及人们认识到有效的护理可以提高患者的治疗效果和控制成本。了解当前的机遇和挑战,医生面临的关于医疗保健系统HVCCC是至关重要的,以适应医生的需求教育。因此,本研究旨在探索医学生,初级医生,和高级医生在HVCCC方面的经验,并寻求高级医生关于教育如何在临床环境中培养HVCCC的观点。
    方法:使用混合方法设计,我们的研究涉及使用马斯特里赫特HVCCC态度问卷(MHAQ)的横断面调查,一部分顾问参与半结构化面试。描述性分析提供了对分类变量和非分类变量的见解,在不同角色的差异(学生,实习生,初级医生,高级医生)通过Kruskal-Wallis测试,辅以使用Mann-WhitneyU检验的两组分析。我们使用Spearman的rho将经验与MHAQ分数相关联,测试了MHAQ与Cronbachα的内部一致性,并对定性数据进行了专题分析。
    结果:我们收到了416份调查回复,12名资深医生参加了半结构化访谈。总的来说,所有群体对HVCCC表现出适度的积极态度,更有经验的医生表现出更有利的观点,特别是将成本融入日常实践。在采访中,参与者同意在本科教学中灌输HVCCC值并在研究生培训中补充正式课程的重要性。这个,加上在职获得的实践知识,被视为培训医生的有益策略。
    结论:该样本的医学生和医院医生对HVCCC普遍表现出积极的态度,高价值护理服务,以及医疗保健成本的整合,建议学生和医生接受未来的HVCCC培训。经验是HVCCC的关键因素,因此,早期接触这些概念可能会增强现有医疗保健预算中的实践。
    BACKGROUND: Adopting high-value, cost-conscious care (HVCCC) principles into medical education is growing in importance due to soaring global healthcare costs and the recognition that efficient care can enhance patient outcomes and control costs. Understanding the current opportunities and challenges doctors face concerning HVCCC in healthcare systems is crucial to tailor education to doctors\' needs. Hence, this study aimed to explore medical students, junior doctors, and senior doctors\' experiences with HVCCC, and to seek senior doctors\' viewpoints on how education can foster HVCCC in clinical environments.
    METHODS: Using a mixed-methods design, our study involved a cross-sectional survey using the Maastricht HVCCC-Attitude Questionnaire (MHAQ), with a subset of consultants engaging in semi-structured interviews. Descriptive analysis provided insights into both categorical and non-categorical variables, with differences examined across roles (students, interns, junior doctors, senior doctors) via Kruskal-Wallis tests, supplemented by two-group analyses using Mann-Whitney U testing. We correlated experience with MHAQ scores using Spearman\'s rho, tested MHAQ\'s internal consistency with Cronbach\'s alpha, and employed thematic analysis for the qualitative data.
    RESULTS: We received 416 responses to the survey, and 12 senior doctors participated in the semi-structured interviews. Overall, all groups demonstrated moderately positive attitudes towards HVCCC, with more experienced doctors exhibiting more favourable views, especially about integrating costs into daily practice. In the interviews, participants agreed on the importance of instilling HVCCC values during undergraduate teaching and supplementing it with a formal curriculum in postgraduate training. This, coupled with practical knowledge gained on-the-job, was seen as a beneficial strategy for training doctors.
    CONCLUSIONS: This sample of medical students and hospital-based doctors display generally positive attitudes towards HVCCC, high-value care provision, and the integration of healthcare costs, suggesting receptiveness to future HVCCC training among students and doctors. Experience is a key factor in HVCCC, so early exposure to these concepts can potentially enhance practice within existing healthcare budgets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医学人文学科的教学越来越多地融入医学院的课程中。我们开发了一个名为LeSermentd\'Augusta(奥古斯塔誓言)的播客,由六集组成,解决现代医疗保健世界中与医患关系有关的热门话题,敬业精神,和道德。这个播客旨在以一种有趣的方式提供科学的内容,同时促进医学生之间的辩论。LeSermentd\'Augusta播客被提议作为索邦大学医学院(巴黎)第二至五年级课程中的各种可选模块之一。我们要求学生报告他们听播客的生活经历。然后,我们使用了文本挖掘方法,重点关注两个主要方面:i)学生使用此教育播客来了解医学人文的观点;ii)在听播客后,他们对医疗保健核心要素的感知和知识的自我报告变化。包括478名学生。学生们很感激有机会参加这个教学模块。他们非常喜欢这种学习工具,并报告说它给了他们学习的自主权。他们欣赏内容和格式,强调这些主题与医学实践的本质有关,并且众多的证词具有巨大的附加值。收听播客会导致知识的获取和视角的重大改变。这些发现进一步支持在医学教育中使用播客,尤其是教授医学人文科学,以及它们在课程中的实施。
    The teaching of medical humanities is increasingly being integrated into medical school curricula. We developed a podcast called Le Serment d\'Augusta (Augusta\'s Oath), consisting of six episodes tackling hot topics in the modern world of healthcare related to the patient-doctor relationship, professionalism, and ethics. This podcast aimed to provide scientific content in an entertaining way, while promoting debate among medical students. The Le Serment d\'Augusta podcast was proposed as one of the various optional modules included in the second- to fifth-year curriculum at the School of Medicine of Sorbonne University (Paris). We asked students to report their lived experience of listening to the podcast. We then used a text-mining approach focusing on two main aspects: i) students\' perspective of the use of this educational podcast to learn about medical humanities; ii) self-reported change in their perception of and knowledge about core elements of healthcare after listening to the podcast. 478 students were included. Students were grateful for the opportunity to participate in this teaching module. They greatly enjoyed this kind of learning tool and reported that it gave them autonomy in learning. They appreciated the content as well as the format, highlighting that the topics were related to the very essence of medical practice and that the numerous testimonies were of great added value. Listening to the podcast resulted in knowledge acquisition and significant change of perspective. These findings further support the use of podcasts in medical education, especially to teach medical humanities, and their implementation in the curriculum.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在美国,性,生殖,围产期健康不平等是有据可查的,众所周知是由许多轴的系统压迫史引起的,包括但不限于种族,种族,性别,社会经济地位,性取向,和残疾。医学院负责教育学生关于压迫制度及其对健康的影响。生殖正义倡导者,包括非专业人士,医学生,和教学教师,敦促将生殖正义框架纳入医学教育和临床实践。为了响应医学生的倡导,我们为临床前医学生开发了有关社会和生殖正义的入门教学课程。这些是以基于团队的学习形式创建的,其中包括关于生殖正义的课前入门材料。在会议期间,学生在小组中参与假设的临床小插曲,以确定可能对所描述的健康结果有贡献的压迫性结构,以及上下文相关和级别适当的宣传的潜在途径。会议于2019年11月(面对面)和2020年(几乎)举行,学生们参加得很好。我们强调我们的经验,学生反馈,接下来的步骤,包括进一步将生殖健康公平纳入医学院课程,与全系教师教育相结合,居民,护理,和专职医疗专业人员。对社会和生殖正义的介绍可以在不同的医学院课程中进行调整和扩展,加强对新一代医生的培训,以批判性地意识到压迫性结构如何造成健康不平等,并能够通过他们作为临床医生的角色减轻其影响,研究人员,和倡导者。
    In the United States, sexual, reproductive, and perinatal health inequities are well documented and known to be caused by a history of systemic oppression along many axes, including but not limited to race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic position, sexual orientation, and disability. Medical schools are responsible for educating students on systems of oppression and their impact on health. Reproductive justice advocates, including lay persons, medical students, and teaching faculty, have urged for integrating the reproductive justice framework into medical education and clinical practice. In response to medical student advocacy, we developed introductory didactic sessions on social and reproductive justice for preclinical medical students. These were created in a team-based learning format and include pre-course primer materials on reproductive justice. During the sessions, students engaged with hypothetical clinical vignettes in small groups to identify oppressive structures that may have contributed to the health outcomes described and potential avenues for contextually relevant and level-appropriate advocacy. The sessions took place in November 2019 (in-person) and 2020 (virtually) and were well attended by students. We highlight our experience, student feedback, and next steps, including further integration of reproductive health equity into medical school curricula in concert with department-wide education for faculty, residents, nursing, and allied health professionals. This introduction to social and reproductive justice can be adapted and scaled across different medical school curricula, enhancing the training of a new generation of physicians to become critically aware of how oppressive structures create health inequities and able to mitigate their impact through their roles as clinicians, researchers, and advocates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:大多数日本医学院可能继续依靠同伴体检(PPE)作为向学生传授体检技能的工具。然而,日本医学生对PPEs的态度尚未确定。因此,我们评估了日本医学院学生对PPE的态度,作为制定适合日本文化背景的PPE政策的准备。
    方法:我们进行了一项混合方法研究,采用解释性顺序方法,使用定性数据解释定量结果.对日本大学的医学生和初级居民进行了调查和访谈。共有63名医学生和50名初级居民回答了问卷。我们采访了16位参与者,以达到理论饱和,并调查了医学生对PPE的态度以及采访数据中出现的主题,提供定量结果的详细描述。
    结果:女性参与者比男性参与者显着更有可能报告不同程度的抵抗在PPE期间成为模型患者(男性:59.7%,女性:87%,p<0.001)。承担脱衣服患者角色的大多数参与者是男性。与会者期望在与保证拒绝成为模范患者的自由和保密措施有关的问题上有所改善。大约22%的参与者报告说,他们在PPE期间目睹了其他学生面前的偶然发现(包括正常范围内的变化)。
    结论:研究结果表明,医学生在PPE期间志愿作为模范患者时期望高度的自主性和保密性。因此,制定适合日本文化的PPE政策可能会有效地建立以学生为中心的PPE环境。
    BACKGROUND: Most Japanese medical schools likely continue to rely on peer physical examination (PPE) as a tool to for teaching physical examination skills to students. However, the attitudes of medical students in Japan toward PPEs have not be identified. Therefore, we evaluated students\' attitudes toward PPE in a Japanese medical school as a preparation for developing a PPE policy tailored to the context of Japanese culture.
    METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study with an explanatory sequential approach, in which qualitative data were used to interpret the quantitative findings. Surveys and interviews were conducted with medical students and junior residents at a Japanese university. A total of 63 medical students and 50 junior residents responded to the questionnaire. We interviewed 16 participants to reach theoretical saturation and investigated the attitudes of medical students toward PPE and the themes emerging from the interview data, providing detailed descriptions of the quantitative findings.
    RESULTS: Female participants were significantly more likely than male participants to report varying degrees of resistance to being a model patient during PPE (male: 59.7%, female: 87%, p < 0.001). Most of the participants who took on the role of patients that involved undressing were males. The participants expected improvements in issues related to the guarantee of freedom to refuse to be a model patient and measures to protect confidentiality. Approximately 22% of the participants reported that they witnessed incidental findings (including variations within the normal range) in front of other students during PPE.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings imply that medical students expect high levels of autonomy and confidentiality when volunteering as model patients during PPE. Thus, developing a PPE policy suitable for Japanese culture may be effective in establishing a student-centered PPE environment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由翻转课堂(FC)和“互联网+”组成的混合式学习是一种新的学习策略,它颠倒了教师和学生在课堂上的地位,并提供丰富的课前和课后学习资源。本研究旨在评估混合学习对循证医学课程学习成果的影响。并与传统的学习方法进行比较。
    方法:两组参与者均来自中国空军医科大学的两个差异队列。两组在课前进行相同的预测试,然后使用两种不同的学习策略进行相同的循证医学章节的教学。在混合学习小组中,要求参与者在上课前一周学习老师发送的学习材料后,制作一份关于他们的学习成果和预先给出的问题答案的汇报幻灯片,老师根据常见问题进行了详细的总结,和分布式多媒体资源供审查。实验完成后,学习成果,包括掌握知识,学习满意度,和自我评价进行了比较。
    结果:37和39名参与者被纳入混合学习和传统学习小组,分别,基线信息和测试前评分无统计学差异。在学习成果中发现了统计学上的显着差异,包括后测得分(t=2.90,p=0.005),前测和后测分数的变化(t=2.49,p=0.022),学习满意度(t=12.41,p=0.001),并对两组进行自我评价(t=7.82,p=0.001)。尤其是,混合学习和传统学习组的前测和后测分数变化为4.05(4.26),和2.00(2.85),分别。
    结论:这项研究表明,与传统学习策略相比,混合学习可以有效地增强参与者对知识的获取,学习满意度,和循证医学中的自我评估。在循证医学课程的教学中,建议采用“互联网+”和翻转课堂的混合学习方法。
    BACKGROUND: Blended learning comprised with flipped classroom (FC) and \"internet plus\" is a new learning strategy that reverses the position of teacher and students in class, and provides abundant learning resources before and after class. This study aimed to assess the impact of blended learning on learning outcomes in evidence-based medicine course, and compare with traditional learning method.
    METHODS: The participants of the two groups were from two difference cohorts in Air force medical university in China. The two groups toke the same pre-test before class and then were given the teaching of same chapters of evidence-based medicine with two different learning strategy. In the blended learning group, the participants were required to create a debriefing slide about their learning outcomes and the answers of questions given in advance after study the learning material sent by teacher a week before class, and the teacher gave a detailed summary based on the common problems, and distributed multimedia resources for review. After the experiment was carried out, learning outcomes including mastering knowledge, learning satisfaction, and self-evaluation were compared.
    RESULTS: 37 and 39 participants were enrolled to blended learning and traditional learning groups, respectively, and no statistically significant difference were found in baseline information and pre-test grades. Statistically significant differences were found in learning outcomes including post-test score (t = 2.90, p = 0.005), changes of scores between pre-test and post-test (t = 2.49, p = 0.022), learning satisfaction (t = 12.41, p = 0.001), and self-evaluation of the two groups (t = 7.82, p = 0.001). Especially, the changes of scores between pre-test and post-test of blended learning and traditional learning groups were 4.05 (4.26), and 2.00 (2.85), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that compared with traditional learning strategy, blended learning can effectively enhanced participants\' acquisition of knowledge, learning satisfaction, and self-evaluation in evidence-based medicine. Using blended learning method including \"internet plus\" and flipped classroom is recommended in the teaching of evidence-based medicine course.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号