• 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于过程的教学是一种新的教育模式。SPARK病例数据库是一个免费的医学影像病例数据库。本文旨在探讨基于SPARK病例数据库的过程式教学在肌肉骨骼系统放射学实践教学中的应用。
    方法:纳入117名三年级医学生。他们被分成A组,B,C和D根据课程安排。A组和B组同时参加实验课,A是实验组,B为对照组。C组和D组同时参加实验课,C是实验组,D为对照组。实验组使用SPARK病例数据库,对照组采用传统教学模式进行学习。四组学生分别在理论课结束后进行测试,在实验课之前,实验课之后,和一周后的实验课比较结果。最后,所有学生都使用SPARK案例数据库进行研究,并在实验课后一个月进行了测试,以比较它们的差异。
    结果:A组和B组理论课后的分数为(100.0±25.4),(101.0±23.8)(t=-0.160,P>0.05),C组和D组为(94.7±23.7),(92.1±18.6)(t=0.467,P>0.05)。A组和B组实验班前后和实验班后一周得分分别为(84.1±17.4),(72.1±21.3)(t=2.363,P<0.05),(107.6±14.3),(102.1±18.0)(t=1.292,P>0.05),(89.7±24.3),(66.6±23.2)(t=3.706,P<0.05)。C组和D组评分分别为(94.0±17.3)分,(72.8±25.5)(t=3.755,P<0.05),(107.3±20.3),(93.1±20.9)(t=2.652,P<0.05),(100.3±19.7),(77.2±24.0)(t=4.039,P<0.05)。A组和B组实验班后一个月的成绩为(86.6±28.8),(84.5±24.0)(t=0.297,P>0.05),C组和D组为(95.7±20.3),(91.7±23.0)(t=0.699,P>0.05)。
    结论:基于SPARK病例数据库的过程式教学可以提高学生肌肉骨骼系统的放射学实践能力。
    BACKGROUND: Process-based teaching is a new education model. SPARK case database is a free medical imaging case database. This manuscript aimed to explore the application of the process-based teaching based on SPARK case database in the practice teaching of radiology in the musculoskeletal system.
    METHODS: 117 third year medical students were included. They were divided into Group A, B, C and D according to the curriculum arrangement. Group A and B attended the experimental class at the same time, A was the experimental group, B was the control group. Group C and D attended experimental classes at the same time, C was the experimental group, D was the control group. The experimental group used SPARK case database, while the control group used traditional teaching model for learning. The four groups of students were respectively tested after the theoretical class, before the experimental class, after the experimental class, and one week after the experimental class to compare the results. Finally, all students used SPARK case database to study, and were tested one month after the experimental class to compare their differences.
    RESULTS: The scores after the theoretical class of Group A and B were (100.0 ± 25.4), (101.0 ± 23.8)(t=-0.160, P > 0.05), Group C and D were (94.7 ± 23.7), (92.1 ± 18.6)(t = 0.467, P > 0.05). The scores of Group A and B before and after the experimental class and one week after the experimental class were respectively (84.1 ± 17.4), (72.1 ± 21.3)(t = 2.363, P < 0.05), (107.6 ± 14.3), (102.1 ± 18.0)(t = 1.292, P > 0.05), (89.7 ± 24.3), (66.6 ± 23.2)(t = 3.706, P < 0.05). The scores of Group C and D were (94.0 ± 17.3), (72.8 ± 25.5)(t = 3.755, P < 0.05), (107.3 ± 20.3), (93.1 ± 20.9)(t = 2.652, P < 0.05), (100.3 ± 19.7), (77.2 ± 24.0)(t = 4.039, P < 0.05). The scores of Group A and B for one month after the experimental class were (86.6 ± 28.8), (84.5 ± 24.0)(t = 0.297, P > 0.05), and Group C and D were (95.7 ± 20.3), (91.7 ± 23.0)(t = 0.699, P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: The process-based teaching based on SPARK case database could improve the radiology practice ability of the musculoskeletal system of students.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由翻转课堂(FC)和“互联网+”组成的混合式学习是一种新的学习策略,它颠倒了教师和学生在课堂上的地位,并提供丰富的课前和课后学习资源。本研究旨在评估混合学习对循证医学课程学习成果的影响。并与传统的学习方法进行比较。
    方法:两组参与者均来自中国空军医科大学的两个差异队列。两组在课前进行相同的预测试,然后使用两种不同的学习策略进行相同的循证医学章节的教学。在混合学习小组中,要求参与者在上课前一周学习老师发送的学习材料后,制作一份关于他们的学习成果和预先给出的问题答案的汇报幻灯片,老师根据常见问题进行了详细的总结,和分布式多媒体资源供审查。实验完成后,学习成果,包括掌握知识,学习满意度,和自我评价进行了比较。
    结果:37和39名参与者被纳入混合学习和传统学习小组,分别,基线信息和测试前评分无统计学差异。在学习成果中发现了统计学上的显着差异,包括后测得分(t=2.90,p=0.005),前测和后测分数的变化(t=2.49,p=0.022),学习满意度(t=12.41,p=0.001),并对两组进行自我评价(t=7.82,p=0.001)。尤其是,混合学习和传统学习组的前测和后测分数变化为4.05(4.26),和2.00(2.85),分别。
    结论:这项研究表明,与传统学习策略相比,混合学习可以有效地增强参与者对知识的获取,学习满意度,和循证医学中的自我评估。在循证医学课程的教学中,建议采用“互联网+”和翻转课堂的混合学习方法。
    BACKGROUND: Blended learning comprised with flipped classroom (FC) and \"internet plus\" is a new learning strategy that reverses the position of teacher and students in class, and provides abundant learning resources before and after class. This study aimed to assess the impact of blended learning on learning outcomes in evidence-based medicine course, and compare with traditional learning method.
    METHODS: The participants of the two groups were from two difference cohorts in Air force medical university in China. The two groups toke the same pre-test before class and then were given the teaching of same chapters of evidence-based medicine with two different learning strategy. In the blended learning group, the participants were required to create a debriefing slide about their learning outcomes and the answers of questions given in advance after study the learning material sent by teacher a week before class, and the teacher gave a detailed summary based on the common problems, and distributed multimedia resources for review. After the experiment was carried out, learning outcomes including mastering knowledge, learning satisfaction, and self-evaluation were compared.
    RESULTS: 37 and 39 participants were enrolled to blended learning and traditional learning groups, respectively, and no statistically significant difference were found in baseline information and pre-test grades. Statistically significant differences were found in learning outcomes including post-test score (t = 2.90, p = 0.005), changes of scores between pre-test and post-test (t = 2.49, p = 0.022), learning satisfaction (t = 12.41, p = 0.001), and self-evaluation of the two groups (t = 7.82, p = 0.001). Especially, the changes of scores between pre-test and post-test of blended learning and traditional learning groups were 4.05 (4.26), and 2.00 (2.85), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that compared with traditional learning strategy, blended learning can effectively enhanced participants\' acquisition of knowledge, learning satisfaction, and self-evaluation in evidence-based medicine. Using blended learning method including \"internet plus\" and flipped classroom is recommended in the teaching of evidence-based medicine course.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在确定参与一种新的动态教学模式的全科住院医师的满意度和未来培训需求,该模式与中国医师协会(CMDA)发布的门诊管理标准化住院医师培训规范相一致。
    方法:对华西医院全科医生的满意度和培训需求进行横断面调查,四川大学。还分析了患者特征和受体对居民表现的反馈。
    结果:该研究涉及109名居民(30.28%的男性)和161名患者(34.78%的男性;年龄:52.63±15.87岁)。居民对动态教学计划的总体满意度得分为4.28±0.62。值得注意的是,在主观-客观-评估-计划(SOAP)评估中,当遇到医疗问题数量越多的患者时,患者得分越低(P<0.001).与患病持续时间较短(<3个月)的患者相比,患病持续时间较长(≥3个月,P=0.044)。住院医师全科医生(GP)通过应用适当和有效的患者转诊(43/109;39.45%)受到最大的挑战。全科医生表达了在面对具有挑战性的患者情况时学习如何做出决定的强烈愿望(4.51±0.63)。
    结论:这项研究建议选择具有多种合并症的患者进行门诊教学,并加强对全科医生实际解决问题能力的培训。这些发现为未来动态教学计划的发展提供了见解。
    BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine the satisfaction and future training needs of general practice residents participating in a novel model of ambulatory teaching aligned with the specifications for standardized residency training in outpatient management issued by the Chinese Medical Doctor Association (CMDA).
    METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of the satisfaction and training needs was conducted among general practice residents at West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Patient characteristics and preceptors\' feedback on the residents\' performance were also analyzed.
    RESULTS: The study involved 109 residents (30.28% men) and 161 patients (34.78% men; age: 52.63 ± 15.87 years). Residents reported an overall satisfaction score of 4.28 ± 0.62 with the ambulatory teaching program. Notably, residents scored lower in the Subjective-Objective-Assessment-Plan (SOAP) evaluation when encountering patients with the greater the number of medical problems (P < 0.001). Residents encountering patients with a shorter duration of illness (< 3 months) achieved higher scores than those with longer illness durations (≥ 3 months, P = 0.044). Residency general practitioners (GPs) were most challenged by applying appropriate and effective patient referrals (43/109; 39.45%). GPs expressed a strong desire to learn how to make decisions when facing challenging patient situations (4.51 ± 0.63).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests selecting patients with multiple comorbidities for ambulatory teaching and enhancing training on practical problem-solving abilities for GPs. The findings provide insights for the development of future ambulatory teaching programs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究的目的是评估团队的有效性-案例-,讲师-,和循证学习(TCLEBL)方法在培养学生的临床和研究能力,与传统的基于讲座的学习(LBL)方法相比。
    方法:将41名医学研究生分为两组,TCLEBL组和LBL组。通过学生和教师反馈问卷评估教学效果,理论考试和书面文献综述的分数,和学生学习负担。
    结果:与LBL方法相比,教师和学生对TCLEBL模型更满意(教师和学生均p<0.001)。与LBL组相比,TCLEBL组在理论检验上的表现显着高于LBL组(p=0.009)。LBL组和TCLEBL组之间存在显著差异,分别,在文献综述和引文方面(12.683±2.207vs.16.302±1.095,p<0.001),论证和观点(12.55±1.572vs.16.333±1.354,p<0.001),内容的全面性(13.3±2.268vs.16.683±1.344,p<0.001),和科学的严谨性和准确性(10.317±1.167vs.12.746±0.706,p<0.001)。两组之间的总课外时间没有显着差异(323.75±30.987minvs.322.619±24.679min,分别为LBL与TCLEBL组,p=0.898)。
    结论:TCLEBL是培养学生临床和研究能力的有效教学方法。
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of team-, case-, lecture-, and evidence-based learning (TCLEBL) methods in cultivating students\' clinical and research abilities, as compared to traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) approaches.
    METHODS: Forty-one medical postgraduates were divided into two groups, a TCLEBL group and an LBL group. Teaching effectiveness was evaluated through student- and teacher-feedback questionnaires, scores from theoretical examinations and written literature reviews, and student learning burdens.
    RESULTS: Compared to the LBL approach, both teachers and students were more satisfied with the TCLEBL model (p < 0.001 for both teachers and students). The TCLEBL group performed significantly higher on the theory test compared to the LBL group (p = 0.009). There were significant differences between the LBL and TCLEBL groups, respectively, in terms of literature review and citations (12.683 ± 2.207 vs. 16.302 ± 1.095, p < 0.001), argument and perspective (12.55 ± 1.572 vs. 16.333 ± 1.354, p < 0.001), comprehensiveness of content (13.3 ± 2.268 vs. 16.683 ± 1.344, p < 0.001), and scientific rigor and accuracy (10.317 ± 1.167 vs. 12.746 ± 0.706, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the total extracurricular time expended between the two groups (323.75 ± 30.987 min vs. 322.619 ± 24.679 min, respectively for LBL vs. TCLEBL groups, p = 0.898).
    CONCLUSIONS: TCLEBL is an effective teaching method that cultivates students\' clinical and research abilities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:目前,我国EBM教育还存在一些不足。该研究旨在探讨“自主协作”的新型循证医学(EBM)学习模式的有效性。
    方法:选择大连大学中山临床学院2019批临床医学专业本科生91名作为研究对象。他们被指示遵循“自主协作”的EBM学习模式。“完成课程后,问卷,记录参与者的情绪和见解,并以循证临床实践报告作为评价培训效果的指标。
    结果:这种学习方式有效地增强了学生的自主学习能力,激发了他们的学习兴趣,加强了师生之间的交流,从而提高教学质量。
    结论:新的EBM学习模型“自主协作,“在教学中表现出强大的有效性,并促进了理论知识与临床实践的无缝整合。因此,强烈建议广泛采用。
    OBJECTIVE: Currently, there are still some shortcomings in EBM education in China.The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the novel evidence-based medicine (EBM) learning model of \"autonomy-collaboration.\"
    METHODS: A total of 91 undergraduate students majoring in clinical medicine at Zhongshan Clinical College of Dalian University from the 2019 batch were selected as the participants in this study. They were instructed to follow the EBM learning model of \"autonomy-collaboration.\" Upon completion of the course, questionnaires, records of participants\' sentiments and insights, and evidence-based clinical practice reports were used as indicators to evaluate the effectiveness of the training.
    RESULTS: This learning modality effectively enhanced independent learning ability of the students, stimulated their interest in learning, and strengthened the communication between students and teachers, thereby improving the quality of teaching.
    CONCLUSIONS: The novel EBM learning model of \"autonomy-collaboration,\" exhibited robust effectiveness in instruction and facilitated the seamless integration of theoretical knowledge with clinical practice. Consequently, its widespread adoption is strongly recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对重庆市某三级儿童医院新生儿住院医师培训的影响,位于中国西南部。具体来说,这项研究包括对居民教育的影响,生活经验,幸福,以及新生儿护理的质量。随着高等教育机构适应大流行后的后COVID-19时代,教育设计师/学者必须从他们在课程设计和交付方面的经验和挑战中学习,确保教育质量和相关性。
    方法:本研究采用混合方法研究了COVID-19大流行对重庆市某三级儿童医院新生儿住院医师培训的影响。第一阶段调查了居民对危机期间临床教育和福祉的看法和经验。第二阶段比较了大流行前和大流行期间的新生儿护理质量。
    结果:对123名新生儿科居民的调查研究了COVID-19对他们学习的影响,培训,和心理健康。调查显示,大多数居民很好地适应了这种情况。尽管如此,一些人在临床教育和经验方面面临挑战,如减少临床接触和机会看到罕见的疾病和条件。对临床数据的回顾性分析显示,在研究期间,新生儿科收治了7,151例新生儿。在COVID-19期间,新生儿入院率下降了27.6%,早产和转院率更高。居民进行了较少的临床程序,但处理了更复杂的病例。在COVID期间,住院时间和费用更高,但抗生素使用率较低。尽管病例组合指数(CMI)得分在大流行期间增加(1.25vs.1.18,p<0.05),7天内再入院率或预后不良无显著差异.
    结论:尽管减少了临床暴露,通过创新的培训方法,加强了全面的住院医师计划,从而保持了新生儿护理的质量。研究表明,在危机期间,新生儿科住院医师教育仍然有效和有弹性。卓越的健康专业教育对于培训合格的医生和增强医疗保健系统以应对未来的挑战至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the impact of the pandemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on neonatology residency training in a tertiary children\'s hospital in Chongqing, located in southwest China. Specifically, the study encompassed the effects on residents\' education, lived experiences, well-being, and the quality of neonatal care delivered. As higher educational institutions adapt to the post-COVID-19 era after the pandemic disruption, it is imperative that educational designers/academics learn from their experiences and challenges in curriculum design and delivery, ensuring quality and relevance in education.
    METHODS: This study employed a mixed-methods approach to investigate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on neonatology residency training at a tertiary children\'s hospital in Chongqing. The first phase surveyed residents\' perceptions and experiences of their clinical education and well-being during the crisis. The second phase compared the quality of neonatal care between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods.
    RESULTS: The survey of 123 neonatology residents examines the effects of COVID-19 on their learning, training, and mental health. The survey showed that most residents adapted well to the situation. Still, some faced challenges in their clinical education and experiences, such as reduced clinical exposure and opportunities to see rare diseases and conditions. A retrospective analysis of clinical data revealed that 7,151 neonates were admitted to the neonatology department during the study period. There was a 27.6% decrease in neonatal admissions during COVID-19, with more premature births and transfers. Residents conducted fewer clinical procedures but managed more complex cases. During COVID, hospital stays and costs were higher, but antibiotic use was lower. Although the case-mix index (CMI) score increased during the pandemic (1.25 vs. 1.18, p < 0.05), there was no significant difference in the rates of readmission within 7 days or poor prognosis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite reduced clinical exposure, the quality of neonatal care was maintained through innovative training methods that enhanced comprehensive residency programs. The study suggested that neonatology residency education remained effective and resilient during the crisis. Exceptional health professional education is vital to train qualified physicians and enhance healthcare systems for future challenges.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:学习进行斜视手术是眼科医生手术训练的一个重要方面。手术步骤的自动分类策略可以提高培训课程的有效性和对居民绩效的有效评估。为此,我们旨在开发和验证一种深度学习(DL)模型,用于自动检测视频中的斜视手术步骤。
    方法:在本研究中,我们收集了上海儿童医院的479个斜视手术视频,上海交通大学医学院附属,从2017年7月到2021年10月。根据国际眼科理事会的眼科手术能力评估规则(ICO-OSCAR:斜视),将视频手动切成八个斜视手术步骤的3345个剪辑。视频数据集按眼睛水平随机分为训练(60%),验证(20%)和测试数据集(20%)。我们评估了两种混合DL算法:基于递归神经网络(RNN)和基于变压器的模型。评估指标包括:准确性,接收器工作特性曲线下的面积,精度,召回和F1得分。
    结果:DL模型识别斜视手术视频剪辑中的步骤,使用基于Transformer的模型获得了1.00(95%CI1.00-1.00)的宏观平均AUC,使用基于RNN的模型获得了0.98(95%CI0.97-1.00)。分别。与基于RNN的模型相比,基于Transformer的模型具有更高的准确性(0.96与0.83,p<0.001)。在检测斜视手术的不同步骤时,基于Transformer的模型的预测能力优于RNN。基于Transformer的模型的精度介于0.90和1之间,基于RNN的模型的精度介于0.75到0.94之间。f1分数对于基于Transformer的模型介于0.93和1之间,对于基于RNN的模型介于0.78到0.92之间。
    结论:DL模型可以高精度地自动识别斜视手术的视频步骤,并且基于Transformer的算法在对视频帧的时空特征进行建模时表现出出色的性能。
    BACKGROUND: Learning to perform strabismus surgery is an essential aspect of ophthalmologists\' surgical training. Automated classification strategy for surgical steps can improve the effectiveness of training curricula and the efficient evaluation of residents\' performance. To this end, we aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model for automated detecting strabismus surgery steps in the videos.
    METHODS: In this study, we gathered 479 strabismus surgery videos from Shanghai Children\'s Hospital, affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, spanning July 2017 to October 2021. The videos were manually cut into 3345 clips of the eight strabismus surgical steps based on the International Council of Ophthalmology\'s Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubrics (ICO-OSCAR: strabismus). The videos dataset was randomly split by eye-level into a training (60%), validation (20%) and testing dataset (20%). We evaluated two hybrid DL algorithms: a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) based and a Transformer-based model. The evaluation metrics included: accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, precision, recall and F1-score.
    RESULTS: DL models identified the steps in video clips of strabismus surgery achieved macro-average AUC of 1.00 (95% CI 1.00-1.00) with Transformer-based model and 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-1.00) with RNN-based model, respectively. The Transformer-based model yielded a higher accuracy compared with RNN-based models (0.96 vs. 0.83, p < 0.001). In detecting different steps of strabismus surgery, the predictive ability of the Transformer-based model was better than that of the RNN. Precision ranged between 0.90 and 1 for the Transformer-based model and 0.75 to 0.94 for the RNN-based model. The f1-score ranged between 0.93 and 1 for the Transformer-based model and 0.78 to 0.92 for the RNN-based model.
    CONCLUSIONS: The DL models can automate identify video steps of strabismus surgery with high accuracy and Transformer-based algorithms show excellent performance when modeling spatiotemporal features of video frames.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人工智能(AI)技术的快速增长是由计算能力的最新进展推动的。虽然,人工智能在医学教育中的应用研究还很缺乏。
    方法:本研究基于TAM-ISSM-UTAUT模型,并引入了STARA意识和冷却效应作为调节变量。从大连某医科大学学生中收集有效问卷657份,中国,并使用SPSS26版对数据进行统计描述,使用Amos3.0软件对研究模型进行验证,以及使用Process(3.3.1)软件进行调节作用分析,和Origin(2021)软件。
    结果:研究结果表明,信息质量和感知有用性是积极影响AI产品使用意愿的关键因素。它还揭示了冷却效应和STARA意识的调节作用。
    结论:这表明提高信息质量可能是鼓励广泛使用AI产品的关键策略。此外,这项调查从医学生的角度为医学教育和人工智能使用的交叉提供了有价值的见解。这项研究可能被证明对未来医学教育智力的提升具有重要意义。
    BACKGROUND: The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has been driven by the latest advances in computing power. Although, there exists a dearth of research on the application of AI in medical education.
    METHODS: this study is based on the TAM-ISSM-UTAUT model and introduces STARA awareness and chilling effect as moderating variables. A total of 657 valid questionnaires were collected from students of a medical university in Dalian, China, and data were statistically described using SPSS version 26, Amos 3.0 software was used to validate the research model, as well as moderated effects analysis using Process (3.3.1) software, and Origin (2021) software.
    RESULTS: The findings reveal that both information quality and perceived usefulness are pivotal factors that positively influence the willingness to use AI products. It also uncovers the moderating influence of the chilling effect and STARA awareness.
    CONCLUSIONS: This suggests that enhancing information quality can be a key strategy to encourage the widespread use of AI products. Furthermore, this investigation offers valuable insights into the intersection of medical education and AI use from the standpoint of medical students. This research may prove to be pertinent in shaping the promotion of Medical Education Intelligence in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管掌握生物统计学有许多优势,医学生通常认为生物统计学是一门困难和具有挑战性的学科,甚至在课程中经历焦虑。学生的学业成绩和他们的态度之间的相关性的证据,这表明生物统计学课程开始时的态度可能会影响课程结束时的认知能力,并随后影响学生的学习成绩。然而,目前在衡量和评估与统计有关的态度方面存在分歧。因此,需要标准工具来评估它们。本研究旨在开发中文版的《统计学态度调查》(SATS-36),以获得一种有效的工具来衡量中国医学教育背景下医学生对生物统计学的态度。
    方法:中文版SATS-36是通过翻译和回译原始量表而开发的,随后根据专家建议进行修订,以确保最合适的项目内容。本地适应是由1709名汉语医学本科生和研究生参加生物统计学课程的。然后,可靠性,通过相关系数计算评估问卷的有效性和区分度,因子分析,并行分析和其他方法。
    结果:中文版SATS-36由36个项目组成,通过因子分析加载了五因素结构,它提供了一个类似但不等于原始六因素结构的替代方案。累积方差贡献率为62.20%,Cronbach'sα系数为0.908,Guttman分半可靠性系数为0.905,重测可靠性系数为0.752。判别分析显示,五个态度分量表存在小到大的显着差异。
    结论:本研究的中文版SATS-36具有良好的效度和信度,可用于评估中国医学生的学习框架。
    BACKGROUND: Despite the numerous advantages of mastering biostatistics, medical students generally perceive biostatistics as a difficult and challenging subject and even experience anxiety during the courses. Evidence for the correlation between students\' academic achievements and their attitudes, indicating that attitudes at the beginning of the biostatistics course may affect cognitive competence at the end of the course and subsequently influence student academic performance. However, there are current disagreements regarding the measurement and evaluation of attitudes related to statistics. Thus, there is a need for standard instruments to assess them. This study was conducted to develop a Chinese version of the Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics (SATS-36) in order to acquire a valid instrument to measure medical students\' attitudes toward biostatistics under Chinese medical educational background.
    METHODS: The Chinese version SATS-36 was developed through translation and back-translation of the original scale, with subsequent revisions based on expert advice to ensure the most appropriate item content. The local adaption was performed with a cohort of 1709 Chinese-speaking medical undergraduate and graduate students enrolled in biostatistics courses. And then, the reliability, validity and discrimination of the questionnaires were evaluated through correlation coefficient calculation, factor analysis, parallel analysis and other methods.
    RESULTS: The Chinese version SATS-36 consisted of 36 items and loaded a five-factor structure by factor analysis, which offered an alternative similar but not equal to that original six-factor structure. The cumulative variance contribution rate was 62.20%, the Cronbach\'s α coefficient was 0.908, the Guttman split-half reliability coefficient was 0.905 and the test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.752. Discriminant analysis revealed small to large significant differences in the five attitude subscales.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version SATS-36 with good validity and reliability in this study can be used to evaluate the learning framework of Chinese medical students.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    移动医疗(mHealth)是一种用于医疗保健系统的新兴移动通信和网络技术。mHealth在医学教育中的整合正在迅速发展,为该领域带来新的变化。然而,没有研究分析了mHealth和医学教育中的出版物和研究趋势。
    本研究的目的是通过搜索和分析已发表的与mHealth和医学教育相关的文章,总结mHealth在医学教育中的应用现状和发展趋势。
    在WebofScience核心数据库中搜索了2003年至2023年发布的与mHealth和医学教育有关的文献,根据检索策略筛选790篇文章。HistCitePro2.0工具用于分析文献计量指标。VOSviewer,Pajek64和SCImagoGraphica软件用于可视化研究趋势并确定该领域的热点。
    在过去的二十年里,医学教育中关于mHealth的论文数量逐渐增加,从2003年的3篇论文增加到2022年的130篇;这一增长在2007年变得尤为明显。全球引文得分确定为10,600,平均每篇文章引用13.42次。当地引文得分为96。美国是mHealth在医学教育中应用最广泛的国家,在这一领域进行深入研究的大多数机构也位于美国,紧随其后的是中国和英国。根据目前的趋势,全球合作和研究交流可能会继续扩大。在这个联合领域出版的研究期刊中,JMIR出版的期刊具有绝对优势。共识别出105个关键词,分为五类,指向不同的研究方向。
    在COVID-19的影响下,随着智能手机和现代通信技术的普及,mHealth与医学教育相结合的领域已成为一个比较热门的研究方向。数字健康的概念和应用将在未来医学教育的发展中得到推广。
    UNASSIGNED: Mobile health (mHealth) is an emerging mobile communication and networking technology for health care systems. The integration of mHealth in medical education is growing extremely rapidly, bringing new changes to the field. However, no study has analyzed the publication and research trends occurring in both mHealth and medical education.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to summarize the current application and development trends of mHealth in medical education by searching and analyzing published articles related to both mHealth and medical education.
    UNASSIGNED: The literature related to mHealth and medical education published from 2003 to 2023 was searched in the Web of Science core database, and 790 articles were screened according to the search strategy. The HistCite Pro 2.0 tool was used to analyze bibliometric indicators. VOSviewer, Pajek64, and SCImago Graphica software were used to visualize research trends and identify hot spots in the field.
    UNASSIGNED: In the past two decades, the number of published papers on mHealth in medical education has gradually increased, from only 3 papers in 2003 to 130 in 2022; this increase became particularly evident in 2007. The global citation score was determined to be 10,600, with an average of 13.42 citations per article. The local citation score was 96. The United States is the country with the most widespread application of mHealth in medical education, and most of the institutions conducting in-depth research in this field are also located in the United States, closely followed by China and the United Kingdom. Based on current trends, global coauthorship and research exchange will likely continue to expand. Among the research journals publishing in this joint field, journals published by JMIR Publications have an absolute advantage. A total of 105 keywords were identified, which were divided into five categories pointing to different research directions.
    UNASSIGNED: Under the influence of COVID-19, along with the popularization of smartphones and modern communication technology, the field of combining mHealth and medical education has become a more popular research direction. The concept and application of digital health will be promoted in future developments of medical education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号