Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) is associated with neointimal hyperplasia and vein graft failure, and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (hnRNPA1) has emerged as a major modulator of EMT. We aimed to investigate the functional consequence of EndoMT in neointimal hyperplasia and the precise role of hnRNPA1 in the regulation of EndoMT and neointimal hyperplasia. We investigated the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of EndoMT cells in a mouse model of vein graft transplantation. In vitro, we studied the interaction between EndoMT cells and VSMCs, and the underlying mechanism was investigated by cytokine antibody assays. In cultured HUVECs, we studied the effect of hnRNPA1 on EndoMT and the cellular interactions by using siRNA-mediated knockdown and adenovirus-mediated overexpression. We further investigated the role of hnRNPA1 in EndoMT and neointimal hyperplasia in vivo with an AAV-mediated EC-specific hnRNPA1 overexpression murine model. We demonstrated the presence of EndoMT cells during the initial stage of neointimal formation, and that EndoMT cells promoted the proliferation and migration of VSMCs in vitro. Mechanistic studies revealed that EndoMT cells express and secrete a higher level of PDGF-B. Furthermore, we found a regulatory role for hnRNPA1 in EndoMT in vitro and in vivo. Similarly, we found that hnRNPA1 overexpression in ECs reduced the expression and secretion of PDGF-B during EndoMT, effectively inhibiting EndoMT cell-mediated activation of VSMCs in vitro and neointimal formation in vivo. Taken together, these findings indicate that EndoMT cells can activate VSMCs through a paracrine mechanism mediated by hnRNPA1 and lead to neointimal hyperplasia.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to establish which of the current and novel storage fluids caused the least harm to the endothelium of the saphenous vein.
METHODS: Unmanipulated samples of saphenous vein were obtained. This vein was exposed to four fluids, DuraGraft®, Plasma-Lyte, autologous blood and sodium chloride, and a control medium. The expression of endothelial selectin (E-selectin) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) was measured using confocal microscopy.
RESULTS: We identified and quantified platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecules, vascular cell adhesion molecules and endothelial nitric oxide synthase 3 on the endothelium. The results were widely variable. The protein expression of endothelial selectin (p = .17) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase 3 (p = .73) showed no statistically significant differences in levels of preservation when the different solutions were compared.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we could not determine that any of the solutions were superior at preserving saphenous vein endothelium.

Accumulating evidence shows that the abnormal proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) can significantly affect the long-term prognosis of coronary artery bypass grafting. This study aimed to explore the factors affecting the proliferation, migration, and phenotypic transformation of VSMCs. First, we stimulated VSMCs with different platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) concentrations, analyzed the expression of phenotype-associated proteins by Western blotting, and examined cell proliferation by scratch wound healing and the 5-ethynyl-2-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay. VSMC proliferation was induced most by PDGF-BB treatment at 20 ng/mL. miR-200a-3p decreased significantly in A7r5 cells stimulated with PDGF-BB. The overexpression of miR-200a-3p reversed the downregulation of α-SMA (p < 0.001) and the upregulation of vimentin (p < 0.001) caused by PDGF-BB. CCK8 and EdU analyses showed that miR-200a-3p overexpression could inhibit PDGF-BB-induced cell proliferation (p < 0.001). However, flow cytometric analysis showed that it did not significantly increase cell apoptosis. Collectively, the overexpression of miR-200a-3p inhibited the proliferation and migration of VSMCs induced by PDGF-BB, partly by affecting phenotypic transformation-related proteins, providing a new strategy for relieving the restenosis of vein grafts.

Vein grafts are the most used conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), even though many studies have suggested their lower patency compared to arterial alternatives. We have reviewed the techniques and technologies that have been investigated over the years with the aim of improving the quality of these conduits. We found that preoperative and postoperative optimal medical therapy and no-touch harvesting techniques have the strongest evidence for optimizing vein graft patency. On the other hand, the use of venous external support, endoscopic harvesting, vein preservation solution and anastomosis, and graft configuration need further investigation. We have also analyzed strategies to treat vein graft failure: when feasible, re-doing the CABG and native vessel primary coronary intervention (PCI) are the best options, followed by percutaneous procedures targeting the failed grafts.

OBJECTIVE: To verify the administration of a new nano delivery system coated with Tirofiban on preventing early thrombosis in vein graft.
METHODS: Forty New Zealand white rabbits were randomly divided into five groups with eight rabbits in each group. The rabbits of all groups underwent jugular vein transplantation, except group I with only neck opening and closing operation. Vein grafts of group II were preprocessed by intravenous injection of normal saline; group III were preprocessed by tirofiban alone; group IV were preprocessed by unloaded nanoparticles of PLGA-PEG; group V were preprocessed by PLGA-PEG coated with tirofiban. Coagulation and platelet function of peripheral and vein graft blood were detected at 1, 2, 4, 12 h and 1, 3, 7, 10, 14 days after operation. Patency rate of vein graft and blood flow index were measured by vascular ultrasound at third, seventh, 10th, and 14th days after operation; two rabbits in each group were randomly sacrificed at the corresponding time of detection. Pathological differences of vein grafts were observed by HE stainin.
RESULTS: The patency rate of vein grafts in group V was significantly higher than that in group II to IV. The platelet and platelet aggregation rate in group V were inhibited in vein graft blood significantly. The post-operative PT and APTT in vein graft blood in group V were increased obviously while the FBG, D-dimer and FDP were significantly inhibited. Except group I, the lumen loss rate of vein grafts in group V was significantly lower than that in other groups, and vein graft blood in group V had a significant lower expression of platelet P-selectin and GP IIb/IIIa receptor than that in other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: This study proves that PEG-PLGA coated with tirofiban can effectively prevent early vein graft stenosis from thrombosis by inhibition of platelet function, coagulation function.

UNASSIGNED: The treatment of occluded saphenous vein graft (SVG) is challenging, and thus preventing the graft occlusion is of utmost importance. However, despite its recognized importance, a paucity of data exists regarding how SVGs are handled and preserved. Hence, this survey was conducted to document the techniques of vein graft preservation and handling among cardiac surgeons in India.
UNASSIGNED: The survey had 26 questions regarding vein graft usage, harvesting, handling, and preservation techniques. Three hundred cardiac surgeons across India participated in this survey between March 2019 and July 2019.
UNASSIGNED: Responses were received from 215 (71.6%) surgeons across 13 states. Around 87% of respondents reported that ≥ 76% of veins were harvested by the open technique. Among the respondents, around 67% used one SVG in ≥ 96% of their patients, 45% used two SVGs in ≥ 86% of their patients, and 38% used ≥ 3 SVGs in < 25% of their patients, respectively. Around 54%, 27%, 9%, and 9% of respondents used autologous whole blood, saline solution, pH-buffered solution, and other solutions, respectively. In addition, 96.74% of respondents heparinized their vein graft preservation solutions, and 98.14% preserved the solution at room temperature. 34.88% and 83.26% of respondents used dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) before and after surgery in ≥ 76% of their patients, respectively. 63.26% of the surgeons reported that the patients received DAPT for > 12 months.
UNASSIGNED: There is a significant variance in the process of vein harvesting, preservation, handling, and antiplatelet therapy protocols among various cardiac surgeons across India. Therefore, there is a need for standardization in the practice of vein harvesting.

Vein grafts (VGs) are used to bypass atherosclerotic obstructions and arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) as vascular access for hemodialysis. Vascular remodeling governs post-interventional arterialization, but may also induce VG and AVF failure. Although the endpoint characteristics of vascular remodeling are known, the in vivo process and the role of blood flow dynamics has not been fully studied. Therefore, here we non-invasively quantify vascular remodeling and blood flow alterations over time in murine VG and AVF models. C57BL/6J (n = 7, chow diet) and atherosclerosis-prone ApoE3*Leiden (n = 7) mice underwent VG surgery. Ultrasound imaging was performed at 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days post-surgery. C57BL/6J mice (n = 8) received AVF surgery. Ultrasound imaging was performed at 7 and 14 days post-surgery. The luminal volume increased by 42% in the VGs of C57BL/6J and 38% in the VGs of ApoE3*Leiden mice at 28 days relative to 3 days post-surgery. Longitudinally, an 82% increase in wall volume and 76% increase in outward remodeling was found in the ApoE3*Leiden mice, with a constant wall size in C57BL/6J mice. Proximally, the pulsatility index, resistive index, and peak systolic velocity decreased longitudinally in both groups. Distally, the maximum acceleration increased with 56% in C57BL/6J VGs. Among the AVFs, 50% showed maturation after 7 days, based on a novel flow-criterium of 23 mL/min. Distinct flow patterns were observed at the anastomotic site and inflow artery of the AVFs relative to the control carotid arteries. Vascular remodeling can be quantified by ultra-high-frequency ultrasound imaging over time in complex animal models, via three-dimensional structural parameters and site-specific hemodynamic indices.

The great saphenous vein (GSV) is the most commonly used conduit for coronary arterial bypass graft. However, the status of the GSV, including metabolic dysfunction such as diabetes mellitus (DM) complication, is strongly associated with vein graft failure (VGF). To date, the molecular mechanism underlying VGF remains elusive. Detailed characterization of the cellular components and corresponding expression regulation in GSVs would be of great importance for clinical decision making to reduce VGF.
To this end, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing to delineate cellular heterogeneity in three human GSV samples.
Scrutinization of cellular composition and expression revealed cell diversity in human GSVs, particularly endothelial cells (ECs). Our results unraveled that functional adaptation drove great expression differences between venous ECs and valvular ECs. For instance, cell surface receptor ACKR1 demarcated venous Ecs, whereas ACRK3/ACKR4 were exclusively expressed by valvular ECs. Differential gene expression analysis suggested that genes highly expressed in venous ECs were mainly involved in vasculature development and regulation of leukocyte adhesion, whereas valvular ECs have more pronounced expression of genes participating in extracellular matrix organization, ossification and platelet degranulation. Of note, pseudo-time trajectory analysis provided in silico evidence indicating that venous ECs, valvular ECs and lymphatic vessels were developmentally connected. Further, valvular ECs might be an importance source for lymphatic vessel differentiation in adults. Additionally, we found a venous EC subset highly expressing IL6, which might be associated with undesirable prognosis. Meanwhile, we identified a population of ANGPTL7+ fibroblasts (FBs), which may be profibrotic and involved in insulin resistance in human GSVs. Additionally, our data suggest that immune cells only accounted for a small fraction, most of which were macrophages. By assessing the intertwined remodeling in metabolic dysfunction that potentially increases the gene expression regulatory network in mural cells and leukocytes, we found that transcription factor KLF9 likely operated a proinflammatory program, inducing the transcription of metallothionein proteins in two mural cell subsets and proinflammatory immune cells. Lastly, cellular communication analysis revealed that proinflammatory signaling, including TRAIL, PVR, CSF and GDF, were uniquely activated in patients with metabolic dysfunction.
Our results identified critical cell-specific responses and cellular interactions in GSVs. Beyond serving as a repertoire, this work illustrates multifactorial likelihood of VGF.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to detect the predictors of vein graft disease (VGD) progression between 1 week and 1 year after surgery and to evaluate the impact of secondary prevention medications.
METHODS: A total of 218 consecutive patients underwent surgical coronary revascularization were evaluated by coronary computed tomography angiography both at 1-week and 1-year follow-up. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the predictors of VGD progression. A risk score (0-4) was set up to evaluate implementation result of secondary prevention measures according to 1-year follow-up result. Association between VGD progression and the risk score was assessed.
RESULTS: VGD progression occurred in 11.3% of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) and 22.1% of patients. At the patient level, poor vein graft (odds ratio [OR] = 4.25), noncontrolled hyperlipidemia (OR = 3.01), and diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR = 2.96) were predictors, while diameter of SVG (mm, OR = 0.35) was protective factor. At the graft level, DM (OR = 3.52), noncontrolled hyperlipidemia (OR = 2.33), and peripheral artery disease (PAD) (OR = 2.20) were predictors, while number of SVGs (OR = 0.63), diameter of SVG (mm, OR = 0.39), and mean graft flow >25 ml/min (OR = 0.35) were protective factors. VGD progression was significantly associated with the risk score at both the patient (OR = 1.52) and the graft level (OR = 1.38).
CONCLUSIONS: Poor vein graft, noncontrolled hyperlipidemia and DM were predictors of VGD progression between 1 week and 1 year after surgery at the patient level, while larger SVG diameter was a protective factor. DM, PAD and noncontrolled hyperlipidemia were predictors at the graft level, while a number of SVGs, larger SVG diameter, and mean graft flow >25 ml/min were protective factors. Implementation failure of secondary prevention medications was associated with VGD progression from as early as 1 year after surgery.

暂无摘要。