survival outcome

生存结果
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于没有突变驱动基因的未分化甲状腺癌(ATC)患者,化疗被认为是一线治疗选择.然而,化疗治疗ATC的益处有限.在这个分析中,我们收集了自2010年以来报告的前瞻性数据,以全面分析ATC中新兴的基于化疗的治疗方法.
    对于此更新的分析,我们搜索了PubMed(MEDLINE),WebofScience,Embase,2010年1月1日至2024年2月7日的CochraneCENTRAL数据库,用于包含基于化疗的治疗的前瞻性临床研究.这项分析是为了汇集总生存率(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),客观反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(DCRs),和3级或更严重的治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)。
    纳入了对232名患者的6项前瞻性临床试验。化疗常联合靶向治疗或放疗。合并的中位OS为6.0个月(95%CI4.1-9.7),接受化疗策略的ATC患者的中位PFS为3.2个月(95%CI1.9-6.0).综合ORR和DCR分别为21%(95%CI15%-27%)和64%(95%CI55%-72%),分别。关于三年级或更糟糕的TRAE,合并发生率为68%(95%CI47%-86%).
    尽管新兴的基于化疗的治疗在ATC患者中显示出抗肿瘤活性,这些策略未能显著延长生存时间.更实用,安全,ATC患者的新治疗方案需要进一步研究。
    UNASSIGNED: For patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) without mutational driver genes, chemotherapy is suggested to be the first-line treatment option. However, the benefits of chemotherapy in treating ATC are limited. In this analysis, we collected the prospective data reported since 2010 to analyze the emerging chemotherapy-based treatments in ATC comprehensively.
    UNASSIGNED: For this updated analysis, we searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from 1 January 2010 to 7 February 2024 for prospective clinical studies that contained chemotherapy-based treatments. This analysis was done to pool overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), disease control rates (DCRs), and grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).
    UNASSIGNED: Six prospective clinical trials with 232 patients were included. Chemotherapy was commonly combined with targeted therapy or radiotherapy. The pooled median OS was 6.0 months (95% CI 4.1-9.7), and the median PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI 1.9-6.0) in patients with ATC who received chemotherapy-based strategies. The integrated ORR and DCR were 21% (95% CI 15%-27%) and 64% (95% CI 55%-72%), respectively. Regarding the grade 3 or worse TRAE, the pooled incidence was 68% (95% CI 47%-86%).
    UNASSIGNED: Although the emerging chemotherapy-based treatments showed antitumor activity in patients with ATC, these strategies failed to prolong the survival time substantially. More practical, safe, and novel therapeutic regimens for patients with ATC warrant further investigations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管多西他赛和ARSI在前列腺癌的临床指南中被认为是对抗化疗初治转移性CRPC的治疗选择,没有明确的证据表明哪种药物应该作为一线治疗。因此,我们调查了使用多西他赛或ARSI作为一线药物治疗的CRPC队列,以解决这些临床问题.
    方法:本研究纳入了在2006年3月至2017年4月期间在Jikei大学医院及其附属机构接受一线多西他赛或ARSI(阿比特龙或恩扎鲁他胺)治疗的345例化疗初治CRPC患者。倾向评分匹配方法用于最小化患者的背景。结果测量为PSA反应率,PSA下降≥90%,癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)。
    结果:PSA下降与OS和CSS相关(分别为p=0.027,<0.001),多西他赛组中位PSA下降率为60.4%,ARSI组为85.7%(p=0.0311)。多西他赛组的中位OS为33m(95CI:27-53),ARSI组为61m(95CI:47-NA)(p=0.0246)。在倾向评分匹配队列中,多西他赛组的CSS中位数为34m(95CI:27-53),ARSI组的NR(未达到)(95CI:61-NA)(p=0.000133)。在多变量分析中,ARSI诱导首先显示OS和CSS的显著更好(分别为p=0.0033和<0.001)。
    结论:在这项研究中,ARSI诱导的生存结局优于多西他赛对抗化疗初治CRPC。在这项研究中找不到首先通过诱导多西他赛获得生存益处的候选人。
    OBJECTIVE: Although docetaxel and ARSI are picked up as treatment options against chemo-naïve metastatic CRPC in clinical guidelines for prostate cancer, there is no clear evidence which agent should be introduced as first line treatment. Therefore, we investigated our CRPC cohort treated with docetaxel or ARSI as first-line agent against chemo-naïve CRPC to solve these clinical questions.
    METHODS: A total of 345 chemotherapy-naïve CRPC patients introduced to first-line docetaxel or ARSI (abiraterone or enzalutamide) between March 2006 and April 2017 at Jikei University Hospital and its affiliated institutions were included in this study. Propensity score matching method was used to minimize the patients\' background. The outcome measures were PSA response rate, PSA decline ≥ 90%, cancer specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS).
    RESULTS: PSA decline correlated OS and CSS (p = 0.027, < 0.001, respectively) and median PSA decline rate was 60.4% in docetaxel group and 85.7% in ARSI group (p = 0.0311). Median OS was 33 m (95%CI: 27-53) in docetaxel group and 61 m (95%CI: 47-NA) in ARSI group (p = 0.0246). Median CSS was 34 m (95%CI: 27-53) in docetaxel group and NR (not reached) (95%CI: 61-NA) in ARSI group (p = 0.000133) in propensity score matching cohort. In multivariate analysis, ARSI induction first showed significantly better for OS and CSS (p = 0.0033 and < 0.001, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this study, better survival outcome with ARSI induction first than docetaxel against chemo-naïve CRPC. And the candidates who had survival benefit by induction docetaxel first could not be found in this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:动态对比增强(DCE)MRI中骨肉瘤的灌注减少,反映了对新辅助化疗的良好组织学反应,已被描述。
    目的:在本研究中,我们旨在探讨相对洗入率作为无事件生存期(EFS)预后因素的可能性.
    方法:骨骼高级别骨肉瘤患者,在2005年至2022年期间在两个三级转诊中心接受治疗的患者被回顾性纳入.之前用DCE-MRI确定相对洗入率(rWIR),之后,或在化疗的第二个周期(切除前)。先前确定的截止值用于对患者进行分类,其中rWIR<2.3被认为是差的,rWIR≥2.3是良好的放射学响应。EFS定义为从切除到第一次事件的时间:局部复发,新的转移瘤,或肿瘤相关死亡。EFS是使用Kaplan-Meier的方法进行估计的。多变量Cox比例风险模型用于估计组织学反应和rWIR对EFS的影响,对传统的预后因素进行了调整。
    结果:纳入82例患者(中位年龄:17岁;IQR:14-28)。中位随访时间为11.8年(95%CI:11.0-12.7)。随访期间,发生了33个事件不良的组织学反应与EFS没有显着相关(HR:1.8;95%CI:0.9-3.8),而放射学应答差与EFS差相关(HR:2.4;95%CI:1.1-5.0).在没有初始转移的亚群中,rWIR的二元评估接近统计学意义(HR:2.3;95%CI:1.0-5.2),而其持续评估表明rWIR较高与EFS改善之间存在显著关联(HR:0.7;95%CI:0.5-0.9),强调化疗反应的效果。rWIR≥2.3患者的2年和5年EFS分别为85%和75%,rWIR<2.3患者为55%和50%。
    结论:预测的MRI不良化疗反应(rWIR<2.3)与较短的EFS相关,即使对已知的临床协变量进行了调整,并且显示出与组织学反应评估相似的结果。rWIR是骨肉瘤患者手术切除前未来基于反应的个体化医疗的潜在工具。
    BACKGROUND: The decreased perfusion of osteosarcoma in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, reflecting a good histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, has been described.
    OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aim to explore the potential of the relative wash-in rate as a prognostic factor for event-free survival (EFS).
    METHODS: Skeletal high-grade osteosarcoma patients, treated in two tertiary referral centers between 2005 and 2022, were retrospectively included. The relative wash-in rate (rWIR) was determined with DCE-MRI before, after, or during the second cycle of chemotherapy (pre-resection). A previously determined cut-off was used to categorize patients, where rWIR < 2.3 was considered poor and rWIR ≥ 2.3 a good radiological response. EFS was defined as the time from resection to the first event: local recurrence, new metastases, or tumor-related death. EFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier\'s methodology. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the effect of histological response and rWIR on EFS, adjusted for traditional prognostic factors.
    RESULTS: Eighty-two patients (median age: 17 years; IQR: 14-28) were included. The median follow-up duration was 11.8 years (95% CI: 11.0-12.7). During follow-up, 33 events occurred. Poor histological response was not significantly associated with EFS (HR: 1.8; 95% CI: 0.9-3.8), whereas a poor radiological response was associated with a worse EFS (HR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.1-5.0). In a subpopulation without initial metastases, the binary assessment of rWIR approached statistical significance (HR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.0-5.2), whereas its continuous evaluation demonstrated a significant association between higher rWIR and improved EFS (HR: 0.7; 95% CI: 0.5-0.9), underlining the effect of response to chemotherapy. The 2- and 5-year EFS for patients with a rWIR ≥ 2.3 were 85% and 75% versus 55% and 50% for patients with a rWIR < 2.3.
    CONCLUSIONS: The predicted poor chemo response with MRI (rWIR < 2.3) is associated with shorter EFS even when adjusted for known clinical covariates and shows similar results to histological response evaluation. rWIR is a potential tool for future response-based individualized healthcare in osteosarcoma patients before surgical resection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:急性胰腺炎(AP)是胰腺的一种炎症性疾病,严重AP(SAP)预后较差。该研究旨在确定有希望的生物标志物,以预测SAP患者的发生和生存结果。
    方法:回顾性招募240例AP患者,其中72例患有SAP。进行血液检查以收集实验室指标。治疗后,记录患者的死亡率.
    结果:SAP组患者的重症监护病房入院率较高,住院时间较长(p<.001)。在实验室参数中,显著高值的C反应蛋白(CRP),甘油三酯和葡萄糖(TyG)指数,相对于非SAP组,SAP组中发现了血管性血友病因子抗原(vWF:Ag)和D-二聚体。接收机工作特性曲线表明CRP性能良好,TyG指数,vWF:Ag和D-二聚体在SAP诊断中的应用。在所有SAP案例中,51人幸存,21人死亡。TyG指数(比值比[OR]=6.914,95%置信区间[CI]=1.193-40.068,p=0.028),vWF:Ag(OR=7.441,95%CI=1.236-244.815,p=0.028),D-二聚体(OR=7.987,95%CI=1.251~50.997,p=0.028)与SAP患者生存结局显著相关。TyG指数和vWF在预测总体预后方面均显示出良好的效率。多变量模型的曲线下面积(PRE=-35.9082.764×TyG0.021×vWF:Ag)为0.909,大于0.9,表明其在预后预测中的出色表现。
    结论:CRP,TyG指数,vWF:Ag,入院时的D-二聚体值可能是SAP发展的潜在临床预测因子。此外,TyG指数和vWF:Ag可能有助于预测生存结果。
    OBJECTIVE: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory disease of the pancreas, and the prognosis of severe AP (SAP) is poor. The study aimed to identify promising biomarkers for predicting the occurrence and survival outcome of SAP patients.
    METHODS: Two hundred and forty AP patients were retrospectively recruited, in which 72 cases with SAP. Blood test was done for collection of laboratory indicators. After treatment, the mortality of patients was recorded.
    RESULTS: Patients in the SAP group had higher intensive care unit admissions and longer hospital stays (p < .001). Among laboratory parameters, significantly high values of C-reactive protein (CRP), triglycerides and glucose (TyG) index, Von willebrand factor antigen (vWF:Ag) and D-dimer were found in SAP groups relative to non-SAP ones. Receiver operating characteristic curve indicated the good performance of CRP, TyG index, vWF:Ag and D-dimer in SAP diagnosis. Among all SAP cases, 51 survived while 21 died. TyG index (odds ratio [OR] = 6.914, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.193-40.068, p = .028), vWF:Ag (OR = 7.441, 95% CI = 1.236-244.815, p = .028), and D-dimer (OR = 7.987, 95% CI = 1.251-50.997, p = .028) were significantly related to survival outcome of SAP patients by multiple logistic regression analysis. Both TyG index and vWF showed favorable efficiency in predicting overall prognosis. The area under the curve for the multivariate model (PRE = -35.908 + 2.764 × TyG + 0.021 × vWF:Ag) was 0.909 which was greater than 0.9, indicating its excellent performance in prognosis prediction.
    CONCLUSIONS: CRP, TyG index, vWF:Ag, and D-dimer values on admission may be potential clinical predictors of the development of SAP. Moreover, TyG index and vWF:Ag may be helpful to predict survival outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:手术对25-羟基维生素D(25-(OH)D)水平有显著影响。围手术期25(OH)D缺乏对结直肠癌(CRC)患者预后的影响仍存在不确定性。本研究的目的是探讨围手术期25(OH)D缺乏与CRC生存结局之间的潜在关联。
    方法:七个电子数据库[包括PubMed,EMBASE,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,OvidMEDLINE(R),中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)和王方数据]进行了无语言限制的搜索。主要结果是总生存率和全因死亡率。次要结果是围手术期25(OH)D缺乏的发生率和低25(OH)D水平的风险变量。
    结果:获得了14项符合条件的研究,9324例患者用于荟萃分析。在围手术期,血25(OH)D缺乏的合并发生率为59.61%(95%CI:45.74-73.48).术后血25(OH)D缺乏的发生率(66.60%)高于术前(52.65%,95%CI:32.94-72.36)。男性(RR=1.09,95%CI:1.03-1.16),直肠肿瘤(RR=1.23,95%CI:1.03-1.47),春季和冬季采样(RR=1.24,95%CI:1.02-1.49)是25(OH)D缺乏的危险因素。术后低25(OH)D与短期总生存率(HR=0.43,95%CI:0.24-0.77)之间的关联最为显著,而术前低25(OH)D(HR=0.47,95%CI:0.31-0.70)与长期全因死亡率的相关性比手术后更显著.
    结论:围手术期25(OH)D影响CRC患者的预后。由于全身炎症反应(SIR)的可能混淆作用,同时测定维生素D和SIR对结直肠存活至关重要.
    OBJECTIVE: Surgery had a significant impact on 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-(OH)D) levels. Uncertainty still existed regarding the effects of peri-operative 25(OH)D deficiency on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients\' prognosis. The purpose of the present study was to explore the potential association between the peri-operative 25(OH)D deficiency and the survival outcome of CRC.
    METHODS: Seven electronic databases [including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, OvidMEDLINE(R), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wangfang data] were searched without language limitations. The primary outcomes were overall survival and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of 25(OH)D deficiency and risk variables for low 25(OH)D level in the peri-operative period.
    RESULTS: 14 eligible studies were obtained with 9324 patients for meta-analysis. In the peri-operative period, the pooled incidence of blood 25(OH)D deficiency was 59.61% (95% CI: 45.74-73.48). The incidence of blood 25(OH)D deficiency post-operatively (66.60%) was higher than that pre-operatively (52.65%, 95% CI: 32.94-72.36). Male (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03-1.16), rectum tumor (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.03-1.47), spring and winter sampling (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.49) were the risk factors for the 25(OH)D deficiency. The association between the low 25(OH)D post-operatively and short-term overall survival (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.77) was most prominent, while a low 25(OH)D pre-operatively (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31-0.70) was more significantly associated with long-term all-cause mortality than that after surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Peri-operative 25(OH)D impacted the CRC patients\' prognosis. Due to possible confounding effects of systemic inflammatory response (SIR), simultaneous measurement of vitamin D and SIR is essential for colorectal survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有证据表明二甲双胍使用者患皮肤癌的风险有一定程度的降低。然而,没有研究进一步研究二甲双胍对黑色素瘤生存和安全性结局的影响.本研究旨在定量总结二甲双胍对黑色素瘤患者总生存期(OS)和免疫相关不良反应(irAEs)的影响。
    选择标准:纳入标准是根据PICOS原则设计的。信息来源:PubMed,EMBASE,科克伦图书馆,从这些数据库开始到2023年11月,使用“黑色素瘤”和“二甲双胍”作为关键词,搜索了WebofScience发布的相关文献。生存结果是OS,无进展生存期(PFS),无复发生存率(RFS),和死亡率;安全性结果是错误的。偏倚风险和数据综合:选择用于评估随机试验2中偏倚风险的Cochrane工具(RoB2)和非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)来评估偏倚风险。使用基于Stata15.1SE的CochraneQ和I2统计数据来检验所有研究之间的异质性。漏斗图,Egger回归,和Begg检验用于评估发表偏倚。选择留一法作为灵敏度分析工具。
    共纳入12项研究,涉及111036例黑色素瘤患者。OS的合并HR为0.64(95%CI[0.42,1.00],p=0.004,I2=73.7%),PFS的HR为0.89(95%CI[0.70,1.12],p=0.163,I2=41.4%),RFS的HR为0.62(95%CI[0.26,1.48],p=0.085,I2=66.3%),死亡率为0.53(95%CI[0.46,0.63],p=0.775,I2=0.0%)。二甲双胍组和无二甲双胍组之间的irAE发生率无显著差异(OR=1.01;95%CI[0.42,2.41];p=0.642)。
    使用二甲双胍的黑色素瘤患者的总生存期的改善可能是由于其不同的生物学靶标和对多种全身性疾病的有益作用间接导致的。虽然我们无法证明黑色素瘤患者的生存率有特定的改善,二甲双胍对服用该药物患者的综合益处和安全性值得肯定。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42024518182。
    UNASSIGNED: There is evidence of a modest reduction in skin cancer risk among metformin users. However, no studies have further examined the effects of metformin on melanoma survival and safety outcomes. This study aimed to quantitatively summarize any influence of metformin on the overall survival (OS) and immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) in melanoma patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Selection criteria: The inclusion criteria were designed based on the PICOS principles. Information sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for relevant literature published from the inception of these databases until November 2023 using \'Melanoma\' and \'Metformin\' as keywords. Survival outcomes were OS, progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and mortality; the safety outcome was irAEs. Risk of bias and data Synthesis: The Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trial 2 (RoB2) and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) were selected to assess the risk of bias. The Cochrane Q and I 2 statistics based on Stata 15.1 SE were used to test the heterogeneity among all studies. Funnel plot, Egger regression, and Begg tests were used to evaluate publication bias. The leave-one-out method was selected as the sensitivity analysis tool.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 12 studies were included, involving 111,036 melanoma patients. The pooled HR for OS was 0.64 (95% CI [0.42, 1.00], p = 0.004, I2 = 73.7%), HR for PFS was 0.89 (95% CI [0.70, 1.12], p = 0.163, I2 = 41.4%), HR for RFS was 0.62 (95% CI [0.26, 1.48], p = 0.085, I2 = 66.3%), and HR for mortality was 0.53 (95% CI [0.46, 0.63], p = 0.775, I2 = 0.0%). There was no significant difference in irAEs incidence (OR = 1.01; 95% CI [0.42, 2.41]; p = 0.642) between metformin and no metformin groups.
    UNASSIGNED: The improvement in overall survival of melanoma patients with metformin may indirectly result from its diverse biological targets and beneficial effects on multiple systemic diseases. While we could not demonstrate a specific improvement in the survival of melanoma patients, the combined benefits and safety of metformin for patients taking the drug are worthy of recognition.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024518182.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:神经内分泌肿瘤是一种罕见的头颈部肿瘤。本研究旨在评估临床特征,治疗结果,单一机构治疗的头颈部神经内分泌肿瘤的预后因素。
    方法:在2000年11月至2021年11月之间,回顾性分析了在我们机构治疗的93例诊断为头颈部神经内分泌肿瘤的患者。最初的治疗包括化疗(诱导,佐剂,或同时)联合放疗40例患者(C+RT组),34例(S+RT组)手术后接受RT,手术加抢救治疗19例(S+Sa组)。
    结果:中位随访时间为64.5个月。5年总生存率(OS),无进展生存率(PFS),无局部复发生存率(LRRFS)和无远处转移生存率(DMFS)分别为64.5%,51.6%,66.6%,和62.1%,分别。对于I-II阶段,有或没有放疗的患者的5年LRFS治疗方案(C+RT和S+RT组对S+Sa组)为75.0%对12.7%(p=0.015),而III-IV期,5年LRRFS分别为77.8%和50.0%(p=0.006)。有或没有全身治疗的患者的5年DMFS值(CRT组与SRT或SSa)分别为71.2%和51.5%(p=0.075)。44例(47.3%)患者出现治疗失败,远处转移是主要失败模式。
    结论:放射治疗改善了局部区域控制,在HNNENs的管理中发挥了重要作用。HNNENs的最佳治疗方案仍然是局部和全身治疗的组合。
    BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine neoplasm is a rare cancer of head and neck. This study aimed to evaluate clinical features, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors of neuroendocrine neoplasm of head and neck treated at a single institution.
    METHODS: Between Nov 2000 and Nov 2021, ninety-three patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine neoplasms of head and neck treated at our institution were reviewed retrospectively. The initial treatments included chemotherapy (induction, adjuvant, or concurrent) combined with radiotherapy in 40 patients (C + RT group), surgery followed by post-operative RT in 34 (S + RT group), and surgery plus salvage therapy in 19 patients (S + Sa group).
    RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 64.5 months. 5-year overall survival rate (OS), progression-free survival rate (PFS), loco-regional relapse-free survival free rate (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival rate (DMFS) were 64.5%, 51.6%, 66.6%, and 62.1%, respectively. For stage I-II, the 5-year LRRFS for patients\' treatment regimen with or without radiotherapy (C + RT and S + RT groups versus S + Sa group) was 75.0% versus 12.7% (p = 0.015) while for stage III-IV, the 5-year LRRFS was 77.8% versus 50.0% (p = 0.006). The 5-year DMFS values for patients with or without systemic therapy (C + RT group versus S + RT or S + Sa) were 71.2% and 51.5% (p = 0.075). 44 patients (47.3%) experienced treatment failure and distant metastasis was the main failure pattern.
    CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy improved local-regional control and played an important role in the management of HNNENs. The optimal treatment regimen for HNNENs remains the combination of local and systemic treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胃癌是全球第五大恶性肿瘤,也是癌症相关死亡率的第四大主要因素。在胃癌的不同阶段,机器人胃切除术(RG)与腹腔镜胃切除术(LG)的比较效果尚不清楚。我们比较了RG和LG在早期(cStageI)和晚期(cStageII/III)胃癌中的手术和生存结果,以阐明RG在胃癌各个阶段的疗效差异。
    方法:我们确定了299例患者(LG,170;RG,129)患有cII/III期疾病和569(LG,455;RG,114)患有cStageI疾病,接受LG或RG治疗。在RG和LG的倾向得分匹配之后,选择118对进行cStageII/II,选择113对进行cStageI。分别比较了cStageII/III和cStageI的LG和RG的手术和生存结果。
    结果:在cStageII/III中,RG组Clavien-Dindo(C.D.)≥III级的腹腔内并发症明显少于LG组(LG=8.5vs.RG=1.7%,P=0.033)。多因素分析确定LG是C.D.Grade≥III的腹腔内并发症的独立危险因素(OR5.69,95%CI1.17-27.70,P=0.031)。然而,在cStageI中,LG和RG的手术结局无差异.在cStageI或cStageII/III中,LG和RG之间的生存结果均未观察到差异。
    结论:手术结果证明了RG的真正益处,尤其是晚期胃癌.
    BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is the fifth most prevalent malignancy globally and the fourth major contributor to cancer-related mortality. The comparative effectiveness of robotic gastrectomy (RG) versus laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) at different stages of gastric cancer is unclear regarding surgical and survival outcomes. We compared surgical and survival outcomes between RG and LG in early-stage (cStage I) and advanced (cStage II/III) gastric cancers to elucidate the difference in the efficacy of RG across various stages of gastric cancer.
    METHODS: We identified 299 patients (LG, 170; RG, 129) with cStage II/III disease and 569 (LG, 455; RG, 114) with cStage I disease who underwent either LG or RG. Following propensity score matching for RG and LG, 118 pairs were selected for cStage II/II and 113 pairs for cStage I. Surgical and survival outcomes of LG and RG were separately compared for cStage II/III and cStage I.
    RESULTS: In cStage II/III, RG showed significantly fewer intra-abdominal complications of Clavien-Dindo (C.D.) Grade ≥ III in the RG group than in the LG group (LG = 8.5 vs. RG = 1.7%, P = 0.033). Multivariate analysis identified LG as an independent risk factor for intra-abdominal complications of C.D. Grade ≥ III (OR 5.69, 95% CI 1.17-27.70, P = 0.031). However, in cStage I, no difference in surgical outcomes between LG and RG was observed. No differences were observed in survival outcomes between LG and RG in both cStage I or cStage II/III.
    CONCLUSIONS: The real benefit of RG was demonstrated in surgical outcomes, especially for advanced-stage gastric cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于诊断为经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)难治性的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者,选择有效的治疗方式提出了许多挑战。除了全身治疗,肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)可作为另一种选择.然而,必须确定适合HAIC治疗的患者,以获得生存获益.我们的研究旨在评估HAIC治疗前TACE治疗次数和HAIC期间添加TACE对TACE难治性HCC患者生存率的影响。
    这项回顾性研究包括82例TACE难治性HCC患者(平均年龄60.5岁,75男性)。使用Kaplan-Meier方法进行生存分析,通过对数秩检验比较两组;Cox回归模型用于确定影响生存的因素。
    观察到总有效率(ORR)为29.3%,疾病控制率(DCR)为56.1%。与接受少于四次TACE治疗的患者相比,在HAIC之前接受四次以上TACE治疗的患者表现出明显较差的生存预后。风险比(HR)为0.151(P=0.02)。中位总生存期(OS)有显著差异,为3.4(范围,前组0.5-13.6)个月和14(范围,后者为8.5-19.5个月(P=0.01)。此外,与未接受HAIC治疗的患者相比,接受额外TACE治疗的患者的生存结局有所改善,HR为0.491(P=0.02);这些组的相应OS为14(范围,3.6-14.4)和6.7(范围,2.8-11个月(P=0.02)。
    HAIC可能是TACE难治性HCC患者的合适替代治疗方法。对于那些拥有超过4次TACE会议历史的人来说,应考虑其他替代疗法。在HAIC治疗期间添加TACE可能会延长患者的OS时间,只要它是平衡与维持安全的肝功能。
    UNASSIGNED: The selection of an efficacious treatment modality for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosed as refractory to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) presents numerous challenges. In addition to systemic therapies, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) may serve as an alternative option. However, it is imperative to identify patients who are appropriate candidates for HAIC to confer a survival benefit. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of the number of TACE sessions prior to HAIC treatment and the addition of TACE during HAIC on the survival of HCC patient\'s refractory to TACE.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study included 82 patients with HCC refractory to TACE (mean age 60.5 years, 75 males). Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, with comparison between two groups via the log-rank test; the Cox regression model was utilized to identify factors influencing survival.
    UNASSIGNED: The overall response rate (ORR) was observed to be 29.3%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 56.1%. Patients receiving more than four TACE sessions prior to HAIC exhibited a significantly poorer survival prognosis compared to those receiving fewer than four TACE sessions, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.151 (P=0.02). The median overall survival (OS) was markedly different, being 3.4 (range, 0.5-13.6) months for the former group and 14 (range, 8.5-19.5) months for the latter (P=0.01). Furthermore, patients undergoing additional TACE while receiving HAIC treatment demonstrated improved survival outcomes compared to those who did not, with an HR of 0.491 (P=0.02); the respective OS for these groups was 14 (range, 3.6-14.4) and 6.7 (range, 2.8-11) months (P=0.02).
    UNASSIGNED: HAIC can be a suitable alternative treatment for HCC patient\'s refractory to TACE. For those with a history of more than 4 TACE sessions, other alternative treatments should be considered. The addition of TACE during HAIC treatment may extend patient OS time, provided it is balanced with maintaining safe liver function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肺鳞状细胞癌新辅助免疫化疗后手术的最佳时机似乎是一个有限数据的话题。许多临床研究缺乏关于这一时机的严格指南。本研究的目的是探讨新辅助免疫化疗与手术间隔时间对肺鳞癌患者生存结局的影响。
    方法:本研究对2019年1月至2022年10月在第一附属医院接受新辅助免疫化疗的肺鳞癌患者进行回顾性分析。浙江大学医学院.根据治疗间隔将患者分为两组:≤33天和>33天。该研究的主要观察终点是无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)。次要观察终点包括客观缓解率(ORR),主要病理反应(MPR),病理完全缓解(pCR)。
    结果:使用Kaplan-Meier方法,≤33d组的DFS曲线优于>33d组(p=0.0015).两组的中位DFS分别为952天和590天,分别。组间OS曲线无统计学差异(p=0.66),两组均未达到中位OS。治疗间隔不影响肿瘤或淋巴结的病理反应。
    结论:该研究观察到较短的治疗间隔与改善的DFS相关,不影响操作系统,病理反应,或手术安全。患者应避免在新辅助免疫化疗和手术之间延长治疗间隔。
    OBJECTIVE: The optimal timing for surgery following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for lung squamous cell carcinoma appears to be a topic of limited data. Many clinical studies lack stringent guidelines regarding this timing. The objective of this study is to explore the effect of the interval between neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and surgery on survival outcomes in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma.
    METHODS: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy between January 2019 and October 2022 at The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment interval: ≤33 days and > 33 days. The primary observational endpoints of the study were Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Secondary observational endpoints included Objective response rate (ORR), Major Pathological Response (MPR), and Pathological Complete Remission (pCR).
    RESULTS: Using the Kaplan-Meier methods, the ≤ 33d group demonstrated a superior DFS curve compared to the > 33d group (p = 0.0015). The median DFS for the two groups was 952 days and 590 days, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the OS curves between the groups (p = 0.66), and the median OS was not reached for either group. The treatment interval did not influence the pathologic response of the tumor or lymph nodes.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study observed that shorter treatment intervals were associated with improved DFS, without influencing OS, pathologic response, or surgical safety. Patients should avoid having a prolonged treatment interval between neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号