UNASSIGNED: There is evidence of a modest reduction in skin cancer risk among metformin users. However, no studies have further examined the effects of metformin on melanoma survival and safety outcomes. This study aimed to quantitatively summarize any influence of metformin on the overall survival (OS) and immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) in melanoma patients.
UNASSIGNED: Selection criteria: The inclusion criteria were designed based on the PICOS principles. Information sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for relevant literature published from the inception of these databases until November 2023 using \'Melanoma\' and \'Metformin\' as keywords. Survival outcomes were OS, progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and mortality; the safety outcome was irAEs. Risk of bias and data Synthesis: The Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trial 2 (RoB2) and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) were selected to assess the risk of bias. The Cochrane Q and I 2 statistics based on Stata 15.1 SE were used to test the heterogeneity among all studies. Funnel plot, Egger regression, and Begg tests were used to evaluate publication bias. The leave-one-out method was selected as the sensitivity analysis tool.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 12 studies were included, involving 111,036 melanoma patients. The pooled HR for OS was 0.64 (95% CI [0.42, 1.00], p = 0.004, I2 = 73.7%), HR for PFS was 0.89 (95% CI [0.70, 1.12], p = 0.163, I2 = 41.4%), HR for RFS was 0.62 (95% CI [0.26, 1.48], p = 0.085, I2 = 66.3%), and HR for mortality was 0.53 (95% CI [0.46, 0.63], p = 0.775, I2 = 0.0%). There was no significant difference in irAEs incidence (OR = 1.01; 95% CI [0.42, 2.41]; p = 0.642) between metformin and no metformin groups.
UNASSIGNED: The improvement in overall survival of melanoma patients with metformin may indirectly result from its diverse biological targets and beneficial effects on multiple systemic diseases. While we could not demonstrate a specific improvement in the survival of melanoma patients, the combined benefits and safety of metformin for patients taking the drug are worthy of recognition.
UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024518182.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the difference in survival outcomes between stage IIIC and stages IIIA and IIIB in the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system.
METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched for articles published from November 1, 2018 to January 31, 2023. Articles published in English were considered. The included studies compared the survival outcomes of patients with cervical cancer in FIGO 2018 stage IIIC with those in stages IIIA and IIIB. Studies focused on rare histopathological types were excluded. The statistical analyses were performed using Stata 17 software. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: Ten retrospective cohort studies were eligible, involving 2113 (6.2%), 9812 (28.6%), 44 (0.1%), 10 171 (29.7%), 11 677 (34.1%) and 445 (1.3%) patients in stage IIIA, IIIB, IIIA&B, IIIC, IIIC1, and IIIC2, respectively. In the OS group, stage IIIC/C1 was significantly associated with superior survival compared with stage IIIA (hazard risk [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.93, P = 0.022; I2 = 92.9%) and stage IIIB(A&B) (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71, P < 0.001; I2 = 94.0%). The FIGO 2018 stage IIIC2 was not associated with an increased mortality risk compared with stage IIIA and stage IIIB(A&B). In the PFS group, the outcome of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC/C1 was similar to stage IIIA (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.27-1.64, P = 0.371; I2 = 65.6%), but better than stage IIIB(A&B) (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.83, P < 0.001; I2 = 0.0%). The FIGO 2018 stage IIIC2 has similar PFS outcomes to stage IIIA and stage IIIB(A&B).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that survival outcomes of stage IIIC are no worse than those of stage IIIA and stage IIIB in the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system. In cervical cancer, FIGO 2018 stage IIIC1 has significantly better OS outcomes than stage IIIA and stage IIIB.

UNASSIGNED: Treatment with non-anthracycline (ANT)-based chemotherapy has increased survival in patients with extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL). However, the relative efficacy of various drug combinations has been contentious. We aimed to identify the most effective chemotherapy regimens for newly diagnosed ENKTCL.
UNASSIGNED: A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the differences in survival and treatment responses across various regimens. The primary objective was overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and complete response (CR). We utilized a Bayesian framework to perform the network meta-analysis. Rank probabilities were assessed by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Node-splitting method was used to assess the inconsistency.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 1,113 patients were enrolled across 10 studies. Chemotherapy regimens were grouped into five modalities, for which six types of direct comparisons were available. We identified the asparaginase (ASP)/gemcitabine (GEM)-based regimens superiority over ANT-based, non-ASP/ANT-based and ASP/methotrexate (MTX)-based regimens on OS. Although no significant differences were observed compared with ASP/not otherwise specified-based, ASP/GEM-based regimens were still the best option chemotherapy for OS. Moreover, the ASP/GEM-based regimens demonstrated advantages in PFS, ORR and CR.
UNASSIGNED: According to our network meta-analysis, it appears that ASP/GEM-based regimens could potentially serve as the most effective frontline chemotherapy option for ENKTCL.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the response rate and survival effect of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) during ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC).
METHODS: We searched Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane library electronic databases, Clinical Trials, WanFang Data and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to October 2022. We also searched registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings and reference lists of included studies.
RESULTS: We identified a total of 4259 patients from 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled response rate of residual tumors for RT/CRT was 80.0%, the pooled 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) ratio during RT/CRT group was 61.0%, and the pooled 5-year overall survival (OS) ratio during RT/CRT group was 68.0%; heterogeneity tests demonstrated significant difference between studies (I2 >50%). Cumulative results suggested adjuvant RT/CRT improved 5-year PFS ratio of OCCC patients (OR: 0.51 (95% CI: 0.42-.88), I2 = 22%, P = .009), had no impact on 5-year OS ratio (OR: 0.52 (95% CI: 0.19-1.44), I2 = 87%, P = .21); meta-regression of studies before and after 2000 found consistent results. Sub-analysis observed that adjuvant RT/CRT had no impact on 5-year OS ratio of early-stage (stage I + II) OCCC patients (OR: 0.67 (95% CI: 0.25-1.83), I2 = 85%, P = .44), but might improve 5-year OS ratio of advanced and recurrent OCCC patients (OR: 0.13(95% CI: 0.04-.44), P = .001).
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggested that adjuvant RT/CRT might improve oncologic outcomes of OCCC, especially for advanced and recurrent cases. Due to the inherent selective biases of retrospective studies enrolled in the meta-analysis, more convincing evidences based on prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are urgently needed.

Whether the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) is useful for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains controversial. An electronic database search on EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 30 June 2022 was performed for study selection and data extraction. The associations between the mGPS and survival outcomes were evaluated using a random-effects meta-analysis and expressed as pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. We included 11 studies involving a total of 2017 patients with HNSCC. A higher mGPS was associated with poorer progression-free survival (HR = 2.39, 95% CI 1.69-3.38), overall survival (HR = 2.40, 95% CI 1.94-2.98), disease-specific survival (HR = 2.57, 95% CI 1.71-3.88), and disease-free survival (HR = 2.67, 95% CI 1.51-4.73, all p ≤ 0.001) in HNSCC. The mGPS can function as a valid prognostic biomarker for patients diagnosed as having HNSCC.

The suitability of the high-sensitivity modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (HS-mGPS) in cancer patients remains unknown. We performed a systematic database search from 1 January 2010 to 30 September 2022, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Selected studies reported the HS-mGPS and survival outcomes in cancer patients. The association between the HS-mGPS and survival outcomes was evaluated using a random-effects model and expressed as pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. This meta-analysis evaluated 17 studies with a total of 5828 cancer patients. A higher HS-mGPS was found to be associated with an adverse OS (HR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.80-2.60), DSS (HR = 3.81; 95% CI: 2.03-7.17), and DFS (HR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.48-2.58; all p ≤ 0.001). The prognostic value of the HS-mGPS for the OS trended in a consistent direction after subgrouping and sensitivity analysis. In conclusion, the HS-mGPS serves as a valid prognostic biomarker for cancer patients, with a high HS-mGPS associated with adverse survival outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the survival outcomes among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in China.
METHODS: Relevant studies, published between January 1, 2010 and September 5, 2022, were retrieved from databases, including EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, the China Biology Medicine disk, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases. We included clinical studies in which all patients were diagnosed with CA and underwent out-of-hospital CPR, and the outcome variables were at least one of the following: return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to admission, survival to hospital discharge, 1-month survival, achieved good neurological outcomes, and 1-year survival. Two investigators independently extracted the study data and assessed its quality using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale tool. The data were pooled using random-effects models.
RESULTS: Of the 3620 identified studies, 49 (63,378 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled ROSC rate was 9.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.5-10.5%, I2 = 97%), the pooled survival to admission rate was 5.0% (95% CI 2.7-8.0%, I2 = 98%), and the pooled survival to discharge rate was 1.8% (95% CI 1.2-2.5%, I2 = 95%). Additionally, the ROSC rate of patients with bystander CPR was significantly higher than that of those without bystander CPR, and the pooled odds ratio (OR) was 7.92 (95% CI 4.32-14.53, I2 = 85%). The ROSC rate of participants who started CPR within 5 min was significantly higher than that of those who started CPR after 5 min, and the pooled OR was 5.92 (95% CI 1.92-18.26, I2 = 85%). The ROSC rate of participants with defibrillation was significantly higher than that of those without defibrillation, and the pooled OR was 8.52 (95% CI 3.72-19.52, I2 = 77%).
CONCLUSIONS: The survival outcomes of out-of-hospital CPR in China are far below the world average. Therefore, the policy of providing automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in public places and strengthening CPR training for healthcare providers and public personnel should be encouraged and disseminated nationwide. Trial registration This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022326165) on 29 April 2022.

UNASSIGNED: Localized Gleason Grade Group 5 (GG5) prostate cancer has a poor prognosis and is associated with a higher risk of treatment failure, metastases, and death. Treatment intensification with the addition of a brachytherapy (BT) boost to external beam radiation (EBRT) maximizes local control, which may translate into improved survival outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare survival outcomes for Gleason GG5 patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and either EBRT or EBRT + BT. The MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Survival probabilities for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted and pooled to create a summary survival curve for each treatment modality, which were then compared at fixed points in time. An additional analysis was performed among studies directly comparing EBRT and EBRT + BT using a random-effects model.
UNASSIGNED: Eight retrospective studies were selected for inclusion, representing a total of 1393 EBRT patients and 877 EBRT + BT patients. EBRT + BT was associated with higher DMFS starting at 6 years (86.8 % vs 78.8 %; p = 0.018) and extending out to 10 years (81.8 % vs 66.1 %; p < 0.001), with an overall hazard ratio of 0.53 (p = 0.02). There was no difference in PCSS or OS between treatment modalities. Differences in toxicity were not assessed. There was a wide range of heterogeneity between studies.
UNASSIGNED: The addition of BT boost is associated with improved long-term DMFS in Gleason GG5 prostate cancer, but its impact on PCSS and OS remains unclear. These results may be confounded by the heterogeneity across study populations with concern for a risk of bias. Therefore, prospective studies are necessary to further elucidate the survival advantage associated with BT boost, which must ultimately be weighed against the toxicity-related implications of this treatment strategy.

Glioma is the most common primary central nervous system tumor; many methods are currently being used to research and treat glioma. In recent years, fluorescent-guided resection (FGR) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) have become hot spots in the treatment of glioma. Based on the existing literatures regarding the FGR enhancing resection rate and regarding efficacy of PDT for the treatment of glioma, this paper made a systematic review of FGR for gross total resection of patients and the PDT for the survival of patients with glioma. Meta-analysis of eligible studies was performed to derive precise estimation of PDT on the prognosis of patients with glioma by searching all related literatures in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases, and further to evaluate (GTR) under FGR and the efficacy of PDT therapy, including 1-year and 2-year survival rates, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 1294 patients with glioma were included in the final analysis of 31 articles, among which a 73.00% (95% CI, 68.00 ~ 79.00%, P < 0.01) rate of GTR in 27 groups included in 23 articles was reported for those receiving FGR. The OS was 17.78 months (95% CI, 8.89 ~ 26.67, P < 0.01) in 5 articles on PDT-treated patients with glioma, and the mean difference of OS was 6.18 (95% CI, 3.3 ~ 9.06, P < 0.01) between PDT treatment and conventional glioma surgery, showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01). The PFS was 10.82 months (95% CI, 7.04 ~ 14.61, P < 0.01) in 5 articles on PDT-treated patients with glioma. A 1-year survival rate of 59.00% (95% CI, 38.00 ~ 77.00%, P < 0.01) in 10 groups included in 8 articles and 2-year survival rate of 25.00% (95% CI, 15.00 ~ 36.00%, P < 0.01) in 7 groups included in 6 articles were reported for those with PDT. FGR and PDT are feasible for treatment of patients with glioma, because FGR can effectively increase the resection rate, at the same time, PDT can prolong the survival time. However, due to the limitation of small sample size in the existing studies, larger samples and randomized controlled clinical trials are needed to analyze the resection under FGR and efficacy of PDT in patients with glioma.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are known to have an aggressive clinical course and grave prognosis. Several recommended first-line treatment regimens are available, but identification of the superior treatment remain elusive. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine which study-level factors and group of regimens affect survival outcomes. The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to January 2021, and phase II or III clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of chemotherapy regimens were included. Random effects models were used to estimate 3-year overall survival rate, complete remission rate, and subgroup differences. Meta-regressions were carried out with adjustments for relevant covariates. Overall, 34 cohorts from 28 studies comprising 1424 PTCL patients were included in the pooled analysis. Chemotherapy regimens were divided into four groups: cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP), CHOP plus etoposide, gemcitabine-based, and others. The pooled 3-year overall survival rate was 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.54) for CHOP, 0.61 (95% CI 0.52-0.70) for CHOP plus etoposide, 0.39 (95% CI 0.30-0.47) for gemcitabine-based, and 0.61 (95% CI 0.44-0.78) for others. CHOP plus etoposide was significantly better than CHOP, with the latter used as a reference (coefficient of 0.11; p = 0.035), with adjustment for the proportion of International Prognostic Index score 4-5 in meta-regression analysis. Although grossly divided groups were pooled and analyzed, among four regimen groups for frontline PTCL treatment CHOP plus etoposide showed better survival than CHOP.