survival outcome

生存结果
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    异基因造血细胞移植(alloHCT)具有直接的细胞毒性和移植物抗多发性骨髓瘤作用(GvMM)。越来越多的试验表明,在新诊断和复发MM中进行alloHCT的生存益处。
    我们旨在提供近10年的全面分析,以验证alloHCT在MM患者中的疗效和生存结果。我们的研究包括了总共61项研究,这些研究提供了2013年4月14日至2023年4月14日之间的数据,以及总共15,294例接受过alloSCT的MM患者的数据。最佳反应率(CR,VGPR,PR)和生存结果(1-,2-,3-,5-,和10年操作系统,PFS,NRM)进行了评估。我们进一步独立地在NDMM/前线设置和RRMM/救助设置中进行了荟萃分析。
    合并估计CR,VGPR,PR率分别为0.45、0.21和0.24。1-的汇总估计,2-,3-,5-,和10年OS分别为0.69、0.57、0.45、0.45和0.36;1-,2-,3-,5-,和10年PFS分别为0.47、0.35、0.24、0.25和0.28;1-,2-,3-,5-,10年期NRM分别为0.16、0.21、0.16、0.20和0.15。在NDMM/前期设置中,汇总估计的CR率为0.54,而5年OS的CR率为0.54,PFS,和NRM分别为0.69、0.40和0.11。在复发的环境中,汇总估计的CR率为0.31,而5年OS的CR率为0.31,PFS,和NRM分别为0.24、0.10和0.15。
    我们的结果显示操作系统不变,PFS,和NRM从第三年开始到第十年,这表明alloSCT具有持续生存益处。在NDMM/前线设置中观察到良好的反应率和有希望的生存结果。
    尽管与其他治疗方法相比,alloSCT的缓解率较低,短期生存结局较差,长期随访可以揭示alloSCT对MM患者的生存益处。
    UNASSIGNED: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) possessed direct cytotoxicity and graft-versus-multiple myeloma effect (GvMM). Growing trials have shown survival benefits of performing alloHCT in both newly diagnosed and relapsed MM.
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis in the recent 10 years to verify the efficacy and survival outcome of alloHCT in MM patients. A total of 61 studies which provide data between 14/04/2013 and 14/04/2023 and a total of 15,294 data from MM patients who had undergone alloSCT were included in our study. The best response rates (CR, VGPR, PR) and survival outcomes (1-, 2-, 3-,5-, and 10-year OS, PFS, NRM) were assessed. We further conducted meta-analysis in the NDMM/frontline setting and RRMM/salvage setting independently.
    UNASSIGNED: The pooled estimate CR, VGPR, and PR rates were 0.45, 0.21, and 0.24, respectively. The pooled estimates of 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS were 0.69, 0.57, 0.45, 0.45, and 0.36, respectively; the pooled estimates of 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year PFS were 0.47, 0.35, 0.24, 0.25, and 0.28, respectively; and the pooled estimates of 1-, 2-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year NRM were 0.16, 0.21, 0.16, 0.20, and 0.15, respectively. In the NDMM/upfront setting, the pooled estimate CR rate was 0.54, and those for 5-year OS, PFS, and NRM were 0.69, 0.40, and 0.11, respectively. In a relapsed setting, the pooled estimate CR rate was 0.31, and those for 5-year OS, PFS, and NRM were 0.24, 0.10, and 0.15, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Our results showed constant OS, PFS, and NRM from the third year onwards till the 10th year, suggesting that alloSCT has sustained survival benefits. Good response rate and promising survival outcome were observed in the NDMM/ frontline setting.
    UNASSIGNED: Although comparing with other treatments, alloSCT had a lower response rate and poorer short-term survival outcome, long-term follow-up could reveal survival benefits of alloSCT in MM patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对于没有突变驱动基因的未分化甲状腺癌(ATC)患者,化疗被认为是一线治疗选择.然而,化疗治疗ATC的益处有限.在这个分析中,我们收集了自2010年以来报告的前瞻性数据,以全面分析ATC中新兴的基于化疗的治疗方法.
    对于此更新的分析,我们搜索了PubMed(MEDLINE),WebofScience,Embase,2010年1月1日至2024年2月7日的CochraneCENTRAL数据库,用于包含基于化疗的治疗的前瞻性临床研究.这项分析是为了汇集总生存率(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),客观反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(DCRs),和3级或更严重的治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)。
    纳入了对232名患者的6项前瞻性临床试验。化疗常联合靶向治疗或放疗。合并的中位OS为6.0个月(95%CI4.1-9.7),接受化疗策略的ATC患者的中位PFS为3.2个月(95%CI1.9-6.0).综合ORR和DCR分别为21%(95%CI15%-27%)和64%(95%CI55%-72%),分别。关于三年级或更糟糕的TRAE,合并发生率为68%(95%CI47%-86%).
    尽管新兴的基于化疗的治疗在ATC患者中显示出抗肿瘤活性,这些策略未能显著延长生存时间.更实用,安全,ATC患者的新治疗方案需要进一步研究。
    UNASSIGNED: For patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) without mutational driver genes, chemotherapy is suggested to be the first-line treatment option. However, the benefits of chemotherapy in treating ATC are limited. In this analysis, we collected the prospective data reported since 2010 to analyze the emerging chemotherapy-based treatments in ATC comprehensively.
    UNASSIGNED: For this updated analysis, we searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from 1 January 2010 to 7 February 2024 for prospective clinical studies that contained chemotherapy-based treatments. This analysis was done to pool overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rates (ORRs), disease control rates (DCRs), and grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).
    UNASSIGNED: Six prospective clinical trials with 232 patients were included. Chemotherapy was commonly combined with targeted therapy or radiotherapy. The pooled median OS was 6.0 months (95% CI 4.1-9.7), and the median PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI 1.9-6.0) in patients with ATC who received chemotherapy-based strategies. The integrated ORR and DCR were 21% (95% CI 15%-27%) and 64% (95% CI 55%-72%), respectively. Regarding the grade 3 or worse TRAE, the pooled incidence was 68% (95% CI 47%-86%).
    UNASSIGNED: Although the emerging chemotherapy-based treatments showed antitumor activity in patients with ATC, these strategies failed to prolong the survival time substantially. More practical, safe, and novel therapeutic regimens for patients with ATC warrant further investigations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:急性胰腺炎(AP)是胰腺的一种炎症性疾病,严重AP(SAP)预后较差。该研究旨在确定有希望的生物标志物,以预测SAP患者的发生和生存结果。
    方法:回顾性招募240例AP患者,其中72例患有SAP。进行血液检查以收集实验室指标。治疗后,记录患者的死亡率.
    结果:SAP组患者的重症监护病房入院率较高,住院时间较长(p<.001)。在实验室参数中,显著高值的C反应蛋白(CRP),甘油三酯和葡萄糖(TyG)指数,相对于非SAP组,SAP组中发现了血管性血友病因子抗原(vWF:Ag)和D-二聚体。接收机工作特性曲线表明CRP性能良好,TyG指数,vWF:Ag和D-二聚体在SAP诊断中的应用。在所有SAP案例中,51人幸存,21人死亡。TyG指数(比值比[OR]=6.914,95%置信区间[CI]=1.193-40.068,p=0.028),vWF:Ag(OR=7.441,95%CI=1.236-244.815,p=0.028),D-二聚体(OR=7.987,95%CI=1.251~50.997,p=0.028)与SAP患者生存结局显著相关。TyG指数和vWF在预测总体预后方面均显示出良好的效率。多变量模型的曲线下面积(PRE=-35.9082.764×TyG0.021×vWF:Ag)为0.909,大于0.9,表明其在预后预测中的出色表现。
    结论:CRP,TyG指数,vWF:Ag,入院时的D-二聚体值可能是SAP发展的潜在临床预测因子。此外,TyG指数和vWF:Ag可能有助于预测生存结果。
    OBJECTIVE: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory disease of the pancreas, and the prognosis of severe AP (SAP) is poor. The study aimed to identify promising biomarkers for predicting the occurrence and survival outcome of SAP patients.
    METHODS: Two hundred and forty AP patients were retrospectively recruited, in which 72 cases with SAP. Blood test was done for collection of laboratory indicators. After treatment, the mortality of patients was recorded.
    RESULTS: Patients in the SAP group had higher intensive care unit admissions and longer hospital stays (p < .001). Among laboratory parameters, significantly high values of C-reactive protein (CRP), triglycerides and glucose (TyG) index, Von willebrand factor antigen (vWF:Ag) and D-dimer were found in SAP groups relative to non-SAP ones. Receiver operating characteristic curve indicated the good performance of CRP, TyG index, vWF:Ag and D-dimer in SAP diagnosis. Among all SAP cases, 51 survived while 21 died. TyG index (odds ratio [OR] = 6.914, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.193-40.068, p = .028), vWF:Ag (OR = 7.441, 95% CI = 1.236-244.815, p = .028), and D-dimer (OR = 7.987, 95% CI = 1.251-50.997, p = .028) were significantly related to survival outcome of SAP patients by multiple logistic regression analysis. Both TyG index and vWF showed favorable efficiency in predicting overall prognosis. The area under the curve for the multivariate model (PRE = -35.908 + 2.764 × TyG + 0.021 × vWF:Ag) was 0.909 which was greater than 0.9, indicating its excellent performance in prognosis prediction.
    CONCLUSIONS: CRP, TyG index, vWF:Ag, and D-dimer values on admission may be potential clinical predictors of the development of SAP. Moreover, TyG index and vWF:Ag may be helpful to predict survival outcome.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:手术对25-羟基维生素D(25-(OH)D)水平有显著影响。围手术期25(OH)D缺乏对结直肠癌(CRC)患者预后的影响仍存在不确定性。本研究的目的是探讨围手术期25(OH)D缺乏与CRC生存结局之间的潜在关联。
    方法:七个电子数据库[包括PubMed,EMBASE,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,OvidMEDLINE(R),中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)和王方数据]进行了无语言限制的搜索。主要结果是总生存率和全因死亡率。次要结果是围手术期25(OH)D缺乏的发生率和低25(OH)D水平的风险变量。
    结果:获得了14项符合条件的研究,9324例患者用于荟萃分析。在围手术期,血25(OH)D缺乏的合并发生率为59.61%(95%CI:45.74-73.48).术后血25(OH)D缺乏的发生率(66.60%)高于术前(52.65%,95%CI:32.94-72.36)。男性(RR=1.09,95%CI:1.03-1.16),直肠肿瘤(RR=1.23,95%CI:1.03-1.47),春季和冬季采样(RR=1.24,95%CI:1.02-1.49)是25(OH)D缺乏的危险因素。术后低25(OH)D与短期总生存率(HR=0.43,95%CI:0.24-0.77)之间的关联最为显著,而术前低25(OH)D(HR=0.47,95%CI:0.31-0.70)与长期全因死亡率的相关性比手术后更显著.
    结论:围手术期25(OH)D影响CRC患者的预后。由于全身炎症反应(SIR)的可能混淆作用,同时测定维生素D和SIR对结直肠存活至关重要.
    OBJECTIVE: Surgery had a significant impact on 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-(OH)D) levels. Uncertainty still existed regarding the effects of peri-operative 25(OH)D deficiency on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients\' prognosis. The purpose of the present study was to explore the potential association between the peri-operative 25(OH)D deficiency and the survival outcome of CRC.
    METHODS: Seven electronic databases [including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, OvidMEDLINE(R), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wangfang data] were searched without language limitations. The primary outcomes were overall survival and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of 25(OH)D deficiency and risk variables for low 25(OH)D level in the peri-operative period.
    RESULTS: 14 eligible studies were obtained with 9324 patients for meta-analysis. In the peri-operative period, the pooled incidence of blood 25(OH)D deficiency was 59.61% (95% CI: 45.74-73.48). The incidence of blood 25(OH)D deficiency post-operatively (66.60%) was higher than that pre-operatively (52.65%, 95% CI: 32.94-72.36). Male (RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03-1.16), rectum tumor (RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.03-1.47), spring and winter sampling (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02-1.49) were the risk factors for the 25(OH)D deficiency. The association between the low 25(OH)D post-operatively and short-term overall survival (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.77) was most prominent, while a low 25(OH)D pre-operatively (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31-0.70) was more significantly associated with long-term all-cause mortality than that after surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Peri-operative 25(OH)D impacted the CRC patients\' prognosis. Due to possible confounding effects of systemic inflammatory response (SIR), simultaneous measurement of vitamin D and SIR is essential for colorectal survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有证据表明二甲双胍使用者患皮肤癌的风险有一定程度的降低。然而,没有研究进一步研究二甲双胍对黑色素瘤生存和安全性结局的影响.本研究旨在定量总结二甲双胍对黑色素瘤患者总生存期(OS)和免疫相关不良反应(irAEs)的影响。
    选择标准:纳入标准是根据PICOS原则设计的。信息来源:PubMed,EMBASE,科克伦图书馆,从这些数据库开始到2023年11月,使用“黑色素瘤”和“二甲双胍”作为关键词,搜索了WebofScience发布的相关文献。生存结果是OS,无进展生存期(PFS),无复发生存率(RFS),和死亡率;安全性结果是错误的。偏倚风险和数据综合:选择用于评估随机试验2中偏倚风险的Cochrane工具(RoB2)和非随机研究方法学指数(MINORS)来评估偏倚风险。使用基于Stata15.1SE的CochraneQ和I2统计数据来检验所有研究之间的异质性。漏斗图,Egger回归,和Begg检验用于评估发表偏倚。选择留一法作为灵敏度分析工具。
    共纳入12项研究,涉及111036例黑色素瘤患者。OS的合并HR为0.64(95%CI[0.42,1.00],p=0.004,I2=73.7%),PFS的HR为0.89(95%CI[0.70,1.12],p=0.163,I2=41.4%),RFS的HR为0.62(95%CI[0.26,1.48],p=0.085,I2=66.3%),死亡率为0.53(95%CI[0.46,0.63],p=0.775,I2=0.0%)。二甲双胍组和无二甲双胍组之间的irAE发生率无显著差异(OR=1.01;95%CI[0.42,2.41];p=0.642)。
    使用二甲双胍的黑色素瘤患者的总生存期的改善可能是由于其不同的生物学靶标和对多种全身性疾病的有益作用间接导致的。虽然我们无法证明黑色素瘤患者的生存率有特定的改善,二甲双胍对服用该药物患者的综合益处和安全性值得肯定。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42024518182。
    UNASSIGNED: There is evidence of a modest reduction in skin cancer risk among metformin users. However, no studies have further examined the effects of metformin on melanoma survival and safety outcomes. This study aimed to quantitatively summarize any influence of metformin on the overall survival (OS) and immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) in melanoma patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Selection criteria: The inclusion criteria were designed based on the PICOS principles. Information sources: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for relevant literature published from the inception of these databases until November 2023 using \'Melanoma\' and \'Metformin\' as keywords. Survival outcomes were OS, progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and mortality; the safety outcome was irAEs. Risk of bias and data Synthesis: The Cochrane tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trial 2 (RoB2) and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) were selected to assess the risk of bias. The Cochrane Q and I 2 statistics based on Stata 15.1 SE were used to test the heterogeneity among all studies. Funnel plot, Egger regression, and Begg tests were used to evaluate publication bias. The leave-one-out method was selected as the sensitivity analysis tool.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 12 studies were included, involving 111,036 melanoma patients. The pooled HR for OS was 0.64 (95% CI [0.42, 1.00], p = 0.004, I2 = 73.7%), HR for PFS was 0.89 (95% CI [0.70, 1.12], p = 0.163, I2 = 41.4%), HR for RFS was 0.62 (95% CI [0.26, 1.48], p = 0.085, I2 = 66.3%), and HR for mortality was 0.53 (95% CI [0.46, 0.63], p = 0.775, I2 = 0.0%). There was no significant difference in irAEs incidence (OR = 1.01; 95% CI [0.42, 2.41]; p = 0.642) between metformin and no metformin groups.
    UNASSIGNED: The improvement in overall survival of melanoma patients with metformin may indirectly result from its diverse biological targets and beneficial effects on multiple systemic diseases. While we could not demonstrate a specific improvement in the survival of melanoma patients, the combined benefits and safety of metformin for patients taking the drug are worthy of recognition.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024518182.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:神经内分泌肿瘤是一种罕见的头颈部肿瘤。本研究旨在评估临床特征,治疗结果,单一机构治疗的头颈部神经内分泌肿瘤的预后因素。
    方法:在2000年11月至2021年11月之间,回顾性分析了在我们机构治疗的93例诊断为头颈部神经内分泌肿瘤的患者。最初的治疗包括化疗(诱导,佐剂,或同时)联合放疗40例患者(C+RT组),34例(S+RT组)手术后接受RT,手术加抢救治疗19例(S+Sa组)。
    结果:中位随访时间为64.5个月。5年总生存率(OS),无进展生存率(PFS),无局部复发生存率(LRRFS)和无远处转移生存率(DMFS)分别为64.5%,51.6%,66.6%,和62.1%,分别。对于I-II阶段,有或没有放疗的患者的5年LRFS治疗方案(C+RT和S+RT组对S+Sa组)为75.0%对12.7%(p=0.015),而III-IV期,5年LRRFS分别为77.8%和50.0%(p=0.006)。有或没有全身治疗的患者的5年DMFS值(CRT组与SRT或SSa)分别为71.2%和51.5%(p=0.075)。44例(47.3%)患者出现治疗失败,远处转移是主要失败模式。
    结论:放射治疗改善了局部区域控制,在HNNENs的管理中发挥了重要作用。HNNENs的最佳治疗方案仍然是局部和全身治疗的组合。
    BACKGROUND: Neuroendocrine neoplasm is a rare cancer of head and neck. This study aimed to evaluate clinical features, treatment outcomes, and prognostic factors of neuroendocrine neoplasm of head and neck treated at a single institution.
    METHODS: Between Nov 2000 and Nov 2021, ninety-three patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine neoplasms of head and neck treated at our institution were reviewed retrospectively. The initial treatments included chemotherapy (induction, adjuvant, or concurrent) combined with radiotherapy in 40 patients (C + RT group), surgery followed by post-operative RT in 34 (S + RT group), and surgery plus salvage therapy in 19 patients (S + Sa group).
    RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 64.5 months. 5-year overall survival rate (OS), progression-free survival rate (PFS), loco-regional relapse-free survival free rate (LRRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival rate (DMFS) were 64.5%, 51.6%, 66.6%, and 62.1%, respectively. For stage I-II, the 5-year LRRFS for patients\' treatment regimen with or without radiotherapy (C + RT and S + RT groups versus S + Sa group) was 75.0% versus 12.7% (p = 0.015) while for stage III-IV, the 5-year LRRFS was 77.8% versus 50.0% (p = 0.006). The 5-year DMFS values for patients with or without systemic therapy (C + RT group versus S + RT or S + Sa) were 71.2% and 51.5% (p = 0.075). 44 patients (47.3%) experienced treatment failure and distant metastasis was the main failure pattern.
    CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy improved local-regional control and played an important role in the management of HNNENs. The optimal treatment regimen for HNNENs remains the combination of local and systemic treatments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肺鳞状细胞癌新辅助免疫化疗后手术的最佳时机似乎是一个有限数据的话题。许多临床研究缺乏关于这一时机的严格指南。本研究的目的是探讨新辅助免疫化疗与手术间隔时间对肺鳞癌患者生存结局的影响。
    方法:本研究对2019年1月至2022年10月在第一附属医院接受新辅助免疫化疗的肺鳞癌患者进行回顾性分析。浙江大学医学院.根据治疗间隔将患者分为两组:≤33天和>33天。该研究的主要观察终点是无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)。次要观察终点包括客观缓解率(ORR),主要病理反应(MPR),病理完全缓解(pCR)。
    结果:使用Kaplan-Meier方法,≤33d组的DFS曲线优于>33d组(p=0.0015).两组的中位DFS分别为952天和590天,分别。组间OS曲线无统计学差异(p=0.66),两组均未达到中位OS。治疗间隔不影响肿瘤或淋巴结的病理反应。
    结论:该研究观察到较短的治疗间隔与改善的DFS相关,不影响操作系统,病理反应,或手术安全。患者应避免在新辅助免疫化疗和手术之间延长治疗间隔。
    OBJECTIVE: The optimal timing for surgery following neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for lung squamous cell carcinoma appears to be a topic of limited data. Many clinical studies lack stringent guidelines regarding this timing. The objective of this study is to explore the effect of the interval between neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and surgery on survival outcomes in patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma.
    METHODS: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with lung squamous cell carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy between January 2019 and October 2022 at The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Patients were divided into two groups based on the treatment interval: ≤33 days and > 33 days. The primary observational endpoints of the study were Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Secondary observational endpoints included Objective response rate (ORR), Major Pathological Response (MPR), and Pathological Complete Remission (pCR).
    RESULTS: Using the Kaplan-Meier methods, the ≤ 33d group demonstrated a superior DFS curve compared to the > 33d group (p = 0.0015). The median DFS for the two groups was 952 days and 590 days, respectively. There was no statistical difference in the OS curves between the groups (p = 0.66), and the median OS was not reached for either group. The treatment interval did not influence the pathologic response of the tumor or lymph nodes.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study observed that shorter treatment intervals were associated with improved DFS, without influencing OS, pathologic response, or surgical safety. Patients should avoid having a prolonged treatment interval between neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)是一种罕见且无法治愈的B细胞淋巴瘤亚型,具有侵袭性。乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染与B细胞淋巴瘤的风险增加有关,具有明显的临床和遗传特征。这里,我们显示,9.5%的MCL中国患者为乙型肝炎表面抗原阳性(HBsAg+)。与HBsAg阴性(HBsAg-)患者相比,HBsAg+MCL患者乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)升高的发生率更高,但是在其他临床特征上没有观察到差异,包括性,年龄,ECOGps,安阿伯舞台,MIPI,结外受累和Ki-67。HD-AraC(高剂量阿糖胞苷)方案是年轻HBsAg+患者的主要一线诱导方案,和环磷酰胺,阿霉素,长春新碱和泼尼松(CHOP)用于老年患者。当患者接受利妥昔单抗或基于CHOP的方案治疗时,HBsAg血清阳性与比HBsAg血清阴性显著更短的PFS相关。与CHOP相比,HD-AraC方案与HBsAg+患者较长的PFS相关。用布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(BTKi)单独治疗也可引起HBV再激活。在接受靶向深度测序(TDS)的74例患者中,HBsAg+MCL患者的非同义突变负荷大于HBsAg-MCL患者.HDAC1,TRAF5,FGFR4,SMAD2,JAK3,SMC1A,ZAP70,BLM,CDK12,PLCG2,SMO,TP63,NF1,PTPR,EPHA2、RPTOR和FIP1L1在HBsAg+MCL患者中显著富集。
    Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon and incurable B-cell lymphoma subtype that has an aggressive course. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has been associated with an increased risk for B-cell lymphomas, and is characterized by distinct clinical and genetic features. Here, we showed that 9.5% of MCL Chinese patients were hepatitis B surface antigen positive (HBsAg+). Compared to HBsAg-negative (HBsAg-) patients, HBsAg+ MCL patients had a greater incidence of elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), but no difference was observed in the other clinical characteristics, including sex, age, ECOG ps, Ann Arbor stage, MIPI, extranodal involvement and Ki-67. The HD-AraC (high-dose cytarabine) regimen was the main first-line induction regimen for younger HBsAg+ patients, and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) were used for elderly patients. HBsAg seropositivity was associated with a significantly shorter PFS than HBsAg seronegativity when patients were treated with rituximab or CHOP-based regimens. Compared with CHOP, the HD-AraC regimen was associated with longer PFS in HBsAg+ patients. Treatment with a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) alone can also cause HBV reactivation. Among the 74 patients who underwent targeted deep sequencing (TDS), the nonsynonymous mutation load of HBsAg+ MCL patients was greater than that of HBsAg- MCL patients. HDAC1, TRAF5, FGFR4, SMAD2, JAK3, SMC1A, ZAP70, BLM, CDK12, PLCG2, SMO, TP63, NF1, PTPR, EPHA2, RPTOR and FIP1L1 were significantly enriched in HBsAg+ MCL patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    泛免疫炎症值(PIV)是整合不同外周血细胞亚群的综合生物标志物。本研究旨在评估接受放化疗的鼻咽癌(NPC)患者的PIV预后能力。使用以下等式评估PIV:(中性粒细胞计数×血小板计数×单核细胞计数)/淋巴细胞计数。使用Kaplan-Meier方法和Cox风险回归模型进行生存分析。使用受试者工作特征分析确定PIV和全身免疫炎症指数(SII)的最佳临界值分别为428.0和1032.7。共招募了319名患者。低基线PIV患者(≤428.0)占69.9%(n=223),高基线PIV患者(>428.0)占30.1%(n=96)。与低PIV患者相比,高PIV患者的5年无进展生存期显著恶化[PFS;66.8vs.77.1%;危险比(HR),1.97;95%置信区间(CI),1.22-3.23);P=0.005]和5年总生存率(OS;68.7vs.86.9%,HR,2.71;95%CI,1.45-5.03;P=0.001)。PIV也是OS的重要独立预后指标(HR,2.19;95%CI,1.16-4.12;P=0.016)和PFS(HR,1.86;95%CI,1.14-3.04;P=0.013),在多变量分析中优于SII。总之,在接受放化疗的NPC患者中,PIV是生存结局的有力预测因子,优于SII.应进行PIV的前瞻性验证,以更好地对NPC患者的根治性治疗进行分层。
    The pan-immune-inflammation-value (PIV) is a comprehensive biomarker that integrates different peripheral blood cell subsets. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic ability of PIV in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing chemoradiotherapy. PIV was assessed using the following equation: (Neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox hazards regression models were used for survival analyses. The optimal cut-off values for PIV and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis to be 428.0 and 1032.7, respectively. A total of 319 patients were recruited. Patients with a low baseline PIV (≤428.0) accounted for 69.9% (n=223) and patients with a high baseline PIV (>428.0) accounted for 30.1% (n=96). Compared with patients with low PIV, patients with a high PIV had significantly worse 5-year progression-free survival [PFS; 66.8 vs. 77.1%; hazard ratio (HR), 1.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22-3.23); P=0.005] and 5-year overall survival (OS; 68.7 vs. 86.9%, HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.45-5.03; P=0.001). PIV was also a significant independent prognostic indicator for OS (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.16-4.12; P=0.016) and PFS (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.14-3.04; P=0.013) and outperformed the SII in multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the PIV was a powerful predictor of survival outcomes and outperformed the SII in patients with NPC treated with chemoradiotherapy. Prospective validation of the PIV should be performed to better stratify radical treatment of patients with NPC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据报道,放射治疗(RT)的时间会影响癌症的生存率和治疗毒性。然而,RT交付时间之间的关联,生存,局部晚期鼻咽癌(LA-NPC)的毒性尚未研究。我们回顾性分析了在多个机构接受明确RT的诊断为LA-NPC的患者。白天的中位RT分娩分为早晨(DAY)和夜间(NIGHT)。根据日照时间,季节性变化分为一年中较暗的一半(冬季)和较亮的一半(夏季)。根据基线特征使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡队列。使用Cox回归模型评估生存和毒性结果。共纳入355名患者,白天/夜晚为194/161,冬季/夏季为187/168。在白天进行RT延长了5年总生存期(OS)(90.6%vs.80.0%,p=0.009)。然而,PSM后趋势的显著性消失(p=0.068).在PSM分析之后,DAY队列在5年无进展生存期(PFS)中获得了更大的益处(85.6%vs.73.4%,p=0.021)和无远处转移生存率(DMFS)(89.2%vs.80.8%,p=0.051)与NIGHT亚组相比。此外,多因素分析显示,日间RT是OS的独立预后因素,PFS,和DMFS。此外,日间RT分娩与白细胞减少症和放射性皮炎发病率增加相关.夏季RT递送仅显著影响OS(PSM前:p=0.051;PSM后:p=0.034)。毒性与按季节进行RT递送的时间之间没有关联。在LA-NPC,根治性RT的白天是独立的预后因素。此外,与晚上相比,早晨进行RT导致更严重的毒副作用,这需要在未来的研究中得到证实。
    The timing of radiotherapy (RT) delivery has been reported to affect both cancer survival and treatment toxicity. However, the association among the timing of RT delivery, survival, and toxicity in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) has not been investigated. We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with LA-NPC who received definitive RT at multiple institutions. The median RT delivery daytime was categorized as morning (DAY) and night (NIGHT). Seasonal variations were classified into the darker half of the year (WINTER) and brighter half (SUMMER) according to the sunshine duration. Cohorts were balanced according to baseline characteristics using propensity score matching (PSM). Survival and toxicity outcomes were evaluated using Cox regression models. A total of 355 patients were included, with 194/161 in DAY/NIGHT and 187/168 in WINTER/SUMMER groups. RT delivered during the daytime prolonged the 5-year overall survival (OS) (90.6% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.009). However, the significance of the trend was lost after PSM (p = 0.068). After PSM analysis, the DAY cohort derived a greater benefit in 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (85.6% vs. 73.4%, p = 0.021) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (89.2% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.051) in comparison with the NIGHT subgroup. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that daytime RT was an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS, and DMFS. Furthermore, daytime RT delivery was associated with an increase in the incidence of leukopenia and radiation dermatitis. RT delivery in SUMMER influenced only the OS significantly (before PSM: p = 0.051; after PSM: p = 0.034). There was no association between toxicity and the timing of RT delivery by season. In LA-NPC, the daytime of radical RT served as an independent prognostic factor. Furthermore, RT administered in the morning resulted in more severe toxic side effects than that at night, which needs to be confirmed in a future study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号