Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) delivers a high dose of radiation to a specific brain area while limiting radiation to nearby healthy tissue. While most SRS has traditionally been performed with a stereotactic frame-based approach, this study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of frameless radiosurgery in patients with brain metastases. Our study followed the recommended guidelines summarized in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist. The electronic databases of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS) were searched from inception to 10 October 2023. The pooled rate of outcomes was calculated using random effect model and Restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) method. All statistical analysis was performed by STATA V.17. A total of 499 studies were recruited from the electronic databases. After removing duplicates (n = 117), 382 studies were used for title/abstract, and 329 were removed from the study selection process. A total of 53 articles were used for full-text assessment, and 35 studies were included for data extraction. Our analysis revealed a significant increase across all pooled survival rates and local control rates by initiating the radiosurgery for patients, estimating the pooled 6-month OSR of 75% (95% CI: 68-81%), 1-year overall survival rate (OSR) of 60% (95% CI: 51-69%), 18-month OSR of 48% (95% CI: 10-85%), 2-year OSR of 39% (95% CI: 19-58%), 1-year progression-free survival rate (PFSR) of 68% (95% CI: 39-98%), 2-year PFSR of 75% (95% CI: 58-91%), 6-month local control rate (LCR) of 93% (95% CI: 90-96%), and 12-month LCR of 86% (95% CI: 82-90%). Our meta-analysis findings confirm the efficacy of frameless radiosurgery in treating brain metastases. Using data from several trials, we were able to demonstrate stereotactic radiosurgery\'s effectiveness as a therapy option for brain metastasis patients, demonstrating local control and reasonable overall survival.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: SABR-Dual is a phase-III trial with an initial phase-I safety cohort, of 2-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) with optional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based focal boost, using peri-rectal spacing, for localized prostate cancer. This represents the initial report from the phase-I non-randomized cohort.
METHODS: Subjects had favorable intermediate risk (FIR) or low risk prostate adenocarcinoma, and gland volume <80 cc. All underwent radiopaque hydrogel spacer and fiducial marker placement before simulation (computed tomography and 3-tesla T2 MRI). The clinical target volume included the entire prostate, and in FIR patients, 1-2 cm of seminal vesicle. A 2-mm expansion was applied for planning target volume (PTV), and a dose of 27 Gy was prescribed to the PTV-prostate, 23 Gy to the PTV-seminal vesicle, with an optional 30 Gy simultaneous boost to an MRI-defined dominant lesion. Primary endpoint was 3-month patient-reported changes in quality of life based on the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26, International Prostate Symptom Score, and Sexual Health Inventory for Men questionnaires. Secondary endpoints were 6-month quality of life, acute toxicity (using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) and early Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response.
RESULTS: Among the 20 patients in the phase-I cohort, 95% had FIR disease, and 50% received a simultaneous boost. At median follow-up of 8 months, a 3-month minimally clinically important change occurred in 1/20 (5%), 6/20 (30%), 2/20 (10%), 4/20 (20%), and 5/20 (25%) in urinary incontinence, urinary obstructive, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domains. There was a mean increase of 1 ± 5.4 in International Prostate Symptom Score and decrease of 1.8 ± 6.5 in Sexual Health Inventory for Men scores. Rates of grade 2 urinary and bowel toxicity were 10% and 0%, respectively, with no grade ≥3 toxicities. Mean PSA decrease at last follow-up was 70.4% ± 17.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: This generalizable protocol of 2-fraction prostate SABR using peri-rectal spacing is a safe approach for ultra-hypofractionated dose-escalation, with minimal acute toxicity. Longer-term outcomes and direct comparison with standard 5-fraction SABR are being studied in the phase-III randomized portion of SABR-Dual.

Dose-volume histograms (DVH), along with dose and volume metrics, are central to radiotherapy planning. As such, errors have the potential to significantly impact the selection of appropriate treatment plans. Dose distributions that pass tests in one TPS may fail the same tests when transferred to another, even if using identical structures and dose grid information. This work shows the design and implementation of methods for assessing the accuracy of dose and volume computations performed by treatment planning systems (TPS), and other analytical tools. We demonstrate examples where differences in calculations between systems can change the assessment of a plan\'s clinical acceptability. Our work also provides a more detailed DVH analysis of single targets than earlier published studies. This is relevant for SRS plans and small structure dose assessments. Very small structures are a particular problem because of their coarse digital representation, and the impact of this is thoroughly examined. Reference DVH curves were derived mathematically, based on Gaussian dose distributions centered on spherical structures. The structures and dose distributions were generated synthetically, and imported into RayStation, MasterPlan, and ProKnow. Corresponding DVHs were analytically derived and taken as ground truth references, for comparison with the commercial DVH calculations. Two commonly used dose metrics PCI and MGI were used to determine the limit of calculation accuracy for small structures. In addition, to measure the DVH differences between a larger range of commercial DVH calculators, the D95 metric from a set of real clinical plans was compared across both the 3 DVH calculators under test, and across a further six TPSs from other hospitals. We show that even slight deviations between the results of DVH calculators can lead to plan check failures, and we illustrate this with the commonly used D95 planning metric. We present clinical data across eight planning systems that highlight instances where plan checks would pass in one software and fail in another due to DVH calculation differences. For the smallest volumes tested, errors of up to 20% were observed in the DVHs. RayStation was tested down to a 3 mm radius sphere (≈0.1 cc) and this showed close to 10% error, reducing to 1% for 10 mm radius (≈4.0 cc) and 0.1% for 20 mm radius (≈33 cc). In clinical plans, the variation in D95 was up to 9% for the smallest volumes, and typically around 2% in the range 0.5 cc-20 cc, and 1% in 20 cc-70 cc, falling to <0.1% for large volumes. Paddick Conformity Index (PCI) and Modified Gradient Index (MGI) are commonly used plan quality indicators for very small volumes. For volumes ≈0.1 cc we observed errors of up to 40% in PCI, and up to 75% in MGI. Our study extends the range of tested DVH calculators in published work, and shows their performance over a wider range of volume sizes. We provide quantitative evidence of the critical need to test the accuracy of DVH calculators in the TPS before clinical use. This work is particularly relevant for both stereotactic plan evaluation and for assessment of small volume doses in published dose constraint recommendations. We demonstrate that significant errors can occur in DVHs for volumes less than 1 cc, even if the volumes themselves are calculated accurately. Even for large structures, deviations between the outputs of DVH calculators can lead to indicated or reported plan check failures if they do not include appropriate tolerances. We urge caution in the use of DVH metrics for these very small volumes and recommend that appropriate DVH uncertainty tolerances are set in organ dose constraints when using them to evaluate clinical plans.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic techniques play an important role in neurosurgery. The development of a miniaturized cranial robot with an efficient workflow and accurate surgical execution is an important step in a broader application of these techniques. Herein, the authors describe their experience with the Medtronic Stealth Autoguide miniaturized cranial robot.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 75 cases from 2020 to 2022 was performed. The patients who had undergone surgery utilizing the Stealth Autoguide robot were analyzed for surgical indication and accuracy, operative time, and clinical outcome. The outcomes were defined as follows: for stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG), the electrode placement pattern that identified the seizure focus and did not require any revision or additional leads; for biopsy, the percentage of cases in which diagnostic tissue was obtained; and for laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), the percentage of cases in which laser fiber placement was adequate for ablation. Surgical complications were defined as any asymptomatic or symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, new neurological deficit, or need for electrode, laser fiber, or biopsy needle repositioning or revision.
RESULTS: The Stealth Autoguide robot was utilized in 75 on-label cases, including 40 SEEG cases for seizure focus localization, 19 LITT cases, and 16 stereotactic biopsy cases. The mean real target error (RTE) at the entry was 1.48 ± 0.84 mm for biopsy, 1.36 ± 0.89 mm for Visualase laser fiber placement, and 1.24 ± 0.72 mm for SEEG. The mean RTE at the target was 1.56 ± 0.95 mm for biopsy needle placement, 1.42 ± 0.93 mm for Visualase laser fiber placement, and 1.31 ± 0.87 mm for SEEG electrode placement. The surgical time for unilateral SEEG cases took an average 52 minutes (average 6.5 mins/lead, average 8 electrodes). Bilateral SEEG cases took an average 105 minutes (average 7.5 mins/lead, average 14 electrodes). In the SEEG population, there were no revised or unsuccessful seizure localizations. For biopsy, diagnostic tissue was obtained in 100% of cases. For LITT, fiber placement was adequate for ablation in 100% of cases. There were no cases of symptomatic or asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and no cases required repositioning or replacement of the laser fiber, electrode, or biopsy needle. One patient experienced transient cranial nerve III palsy following laser ablation that resolved in 10 weeks. A failure of communication between the robotic platform and the Stealth Autoguide as a station required the cancellation of 1 procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: The Medtronic Stealth Autoguide robot system is versatile across biopsy, SEEG, and laser ablation indications. Setup and surgical execution are efficient with a high degree of accuracy and consistency.

Stereotactic neurosurgery is a well-established surgical technique for navigation and guidance during treatment of intracranial pathologies. Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is an example of various neurosurgical conditions that can benefit from stereotactic neurosurgery. As a part of our ongoing work toward real-time MR-guided ICH evacuation, we aim to address an unmet clinical need for a skull-mounted frameless stereotactic aiming device that can be used with minimally invasive robotic systems for MR-guided interventions. In this paper, we present NICE-Aiming, a Neurosurgical, Interventional, Configurable device for Effective-Aiming in MR-guided robotic neurosurgical interventions. A kinematic model was developed and the system was used with a concentric tube robot (CTR) for ICH evacuation in (i) a skull phantom and (ii) in the first ever reported ex vivo CTR ICH evacuation using an ex vivo ovine head. The NICE-Aiming prototype provided a tip accuracy of 1.41±0.35 mm in free-space. In the MR-guided gel phantom experiment, the targeting accuracy was 2.07±0.42 mm and the residual hematoma volume was 12.87 mL (24.32% of the original volume). In the MR-guided ex vivo ovine head experiment, the targeting accuracy was 2.48±0.48 mm and the residual hematoma volume was 1.42 mL (25.08% of the original volume).

Purpose/Objective. Small-field measurement poses challenges. Although many high-resolution detectors are commercially available, the EPID for small-field dosimetry remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of EPID for small-field measurements and to derive tailored correction factors for precise small-field dosimetry verification.Material/Methods. Six high-resolution radiation detectors, including W2 and W1 plastic scintillators, Edge-detector, microSilicon, microDiamond and EPID were utilized. The output factors, depth doses and profiles, were measured for various beam energies (6 MV-FF, 6 MV-FFF, 10 MV-FF, and 10 MV-FFF) and field sizes (10 × 10 cm2, 5 × 5 cm2, 4 × 4 cm2, 3 × 3 cm2, 2 × 2 cm2, 1 × 1 cm2, 0.5 × 0.5 cm2) using a Varian Truebeam linear accelerator. During measurements, acrylic plates of appropriate depth were placed on the EPID, while a 3D water tank was used with five-point detectors. EPID measured data were compared with W2 plastic scintillator and measurements from other high-resolution detectors. The analysis included percentage deviations in output factors, differences in percentage for PDD and for the profiles, FWHM, maximum difference in the flat region, penumbra, and 1D gamma were analyzed. The output factor and depth dose ratios were fitted using exponential functions and fractional polynomial fitting in STATA 16.2, with W2 scintillator as reference, and corresponding formulae were obtained. The established correction factors were validated using two Truebeam machines.Results. When comparing EPID and W2-PSD across all field-sizes and energies, the deviation for output factors ranged from 1% to 15%. Depth doses, the percentage difference beyond dmax ranged from 1% to 19%. For profiles, maximum of 4% was observed in the 100%-80% region. The correction factor formulae were validated with two independent EPIDs and closely matched within 3%.Conclusion. EPID can effectively serve as small-field dosimetry verification tool with appropriate correction factors.

OBJECTIVE: Obtaining a definitive pathological diagnosis from brain tissue sampling was challenging due to the small, non-representative sample. This study introduced a novel syringe technique for brain biopsy aimed at enhancing diagnostic accuracy by obtaining core tissue samples that better represent the targeted tissue.
METHODS: The ten patients with atypical brain lesions underwent the syringe biopsy. After meticulous preoperative planning with neuronavigation, a minimally invasive approach was used: a 3 cm skin incision and a 14 mm burr hole were created. A modified 3-cc syringe was used to create negative pressure and cannulate the brain tissue. The desired sample size (24 cm³) was obtained by controlling the syringe depth and withdrawal. Medical records were reviewed to assess sample analysis results and any complications RESULTS: The syringe technique successfully yielded adequate tissue samples in 9 out of 10 patients. In one case, the desired tissue could not be retrieved and required a microsurgical approach for removal. In all ten cases, a correct diagnosis was made without significant complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary findings suggest that the syringe technique is both safe and effective for obtaining substantial volumes of brain tissue, facilitating accurate pathological evaluation in cases of complex neurological disorders.

BACKGROUND: Essential tremor is a neurological condition associated with movement disorder with more prevalence among adult group of population. The burden of essential tremor is peaking globally but with the advancement in the area of functional neurosurgery such as stereotactic thalamotomy, the quality of life of such patients can be improved drastically.
METHODS: This systemic review was conducted in accordance to the guidance of preferred Reporting items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis(PRISMA). Databases of \"PubMed\", \"Embase\", \"Web of Science\", \"Cinhal Plus\", and \"Scopus\" from inception till 2023 was undertaken. A combination of keywords, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), and search terms such as Search strategy for PubMed search was as follows: \"stereotactic thalamotomy\" AND \"essential tremor\".
RESULTS: This systematic review analyzed 9 studies with a total of 274 patients of essential tremor patients. Unilateral thalamotomy was carried out among 268 patients and bilateral thalamotomy in rest of the patients. Vim and Vom nucleus were the site of thalamotmy with ventral intermedius nucleus being the major one. Ten different types of clinical tremor rating scales were used to assess pre operative and post operative improvement in the tremor scales of the individual patients. Dysarthria and limb weakness was noted post operative complication in majority of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that stereotactic thalamotomy provided good functional outcome in patients of essential tremor who underwent unilateral thalamotomy compared to bilateral thalamotomy. The positive outcome outweighs the complications in such functional surgery.

BACKGROUND: With the ever-increasing requirements of accuracy and personalization of radiotherapy treatments, stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) on O-ring Halcyon radiotherapy system could potentially provide a fast, safe, and feasible treatment option.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the delivery of Halcyon VMAT plans for small targets.
METHODS: Well-defined VMAT-SRT plans were created on Halcyon radiotherapy system with the stacked and staggered dual-layer MLC design for the film measurement set-up and the target sizes and shapes designed to emulate the targets of the stereotactic treatments. The planar dose distributions were acquired with film measurements and compared to a current clinical reference dose calculation with AcurosXB (v18.0, Varian Medical Systems) and to Monte Carlo simulations. With the collapsed arc versions of the VMAT-SRT plans, the uncertainty in dose delivery due to the multileaf collimator (MLC) without the gantry rotation could be separated and analyzed.
RESULTS: The target size was mainly limited by the resolution originated from the design of the MLC leaves. The results of the collapsed arc versions of the plans show good consistency among measured, calculated, and simulated dose distributions. With the full VMAT plans, the agreement between calculated and simulated dose distributions was consistent with the collapsed arc versions. The measured dose distribution agreed with the calculated and simulated dose distributions within the target regions, but considerable local differences were observed in the margins of the target. The largest differences located in the steep gradient regions presumably originating from the deviation of the isocenter.
CONCLUSIONS: The potential of the Halcyon radiotherapy system for VMAT-SRT delivery was evaluated and the study revealed valuable insights on the machine characteristics with the delivery.