socioeconomic disparities

社会经济差异
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:历史上婴儿死亡率很高,瑞典的医疗改革相继导致了一个强有力的,分散的全民儿童保健系统覆盖了97%以上的0-5岁人口。然而,卫生不平等已成为一个日益严重的问题,公共卫生法明确规定,应减少卫生不平等,导致各种政府举措。这项研究调查了中央儿童健康服务(CCHS)团队在2017年开始实施国家与地区之间的儿童健康服务无障碍协议期间的经验。该协议旨在提高儿童保健服务的可及性,特别是在社会经济困难地区,但是广泛陈述的指导方针和资金的短期性质引起了人们对其有效性的质疑。这项研究的目的是了解CCHC团队在实施《儿童健康服务无障碍协议》方面的经验,专注于投资决策,实施努力,以及有效使用资金的促进者和障碍。
    方法:CCHC团队被有目的地抽样,并通过电子邮件邀请进行访谈,对非受访者的随访。采访于2023年1月至10月进行,以数字方式进行,并与熟悉这些团队中协议执行情况的个人进行记录。两位作者都对成绩单进行了主题分析,应用布劳恩和克拉克的框架。参与者代表了瑞典不同医疗保健地区的横截面。
    结果:主题分析产生了三个主要主题:“容易来,轻松,\"强调资金的不确定性;\"我们应该做什么?\"表达对项目优先次序和合作伙伴合作的困境;和\"在沙子上建造城堡,“专注于员工保留和基础计划稳定性的挑战。各自的子主题解决了基金分配时机等问题,战略决策,以及实施扩展家访计划的实际困难,特别是与社会服务部门合作。
    结论:这项研究揭示了在瑞典不同地区实施《儿童保健服务无障碍协议》所面临的挑战。这些障碍突出表明,需要制定关于资金使用的精确准则,长期项目可持续性的稳定融资,和强有力的基础支持,以确保有效的专业间合作和基础设施发展,以公平地提供儿童保健服务。
    BACKGROUND: Historically marked by a high infant mortality rate, Sweden\'s healthcare reforms have successively led to a robust, decentralized universal child health system covering over 97% of the population 0-5 years. However, inequities in health have become an increasing problem and the public health law explicitly states that health inequities should be reduced, resulting in various government initiatives. This study examines the experiences of Central Child Health Services (CCHS) teams during the implementation of the Child Health Services Accessibility Agreement between the State and the regions starting in 2017. The agreement aimed to enhance child health service accessibility, especially in socio-economically disadvantaged areas, but broadly stated guidelines and the short-term nature of funding have raised questions about its effectiveness. The aim of this study was to understand the experiences of CCHC teams in implementing the Child Health Services Accessibility Agreement, focusing on investment decisions, implementation efforts, as well as facilitators and barriers to using the funds effectively.
    METHODS: CCHC teams were purposefully sampled and invited via email for interviews, with follow-ups for non-respondents. Conducted from January to October 2023, the interviews were held digitally and recorded with individuals familiar with the agreement\'s implementation within these teams. Both authors analyzed the transcripts thematically, applying Braun and Clarke\'s framework. Participants represented a cross-section of Sweden\'s varied healthcare regions.
    RESULTS: Three main themes emerged from the thematic analysis: \"Easy come, easy go,\" highlighting funding uncertainties; \"What are we supposed to do?\" expressing dilemmas over project prioritization and partner collaboration; and \"Building castles on sand,\" focusing on the challenges of staff retention and foundational program stability. Respective subthemes addressed issues like fund allocation timing, strategic decision-making, and the practical difficulties of implementing extended home visiting programs, particularly in collaboration with social services.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study uncovered the challenges faced in implementing the Child Health Services Accessibility Agreement across different regions in Sweden. These obstacles underline the need for precise guidelines regarding the use of funds, stable financing for long-term project sustainability, and strong foundational support to ensure effective interprofessional collaboration and infrastructure development for equitable service delivery in child health services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:美国的医疗经济困难是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题。这项研究旨在评估南方与不同世代的美国成年人在医疗经济困难方面的非南方差异--婴儿潮一代(出生于1946年至1964年),X世代(生于1965年至1980年),以及千禧一代(出生于1981年至1996年)在平价医疗法案(ACA)前后的时期。
    方法:这项观察性研究利用了国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)的多个波数据,分为三个时期:ACA前(2011-2013),ii)后ACA(2015-2018),和iii)COVID-19大流行(2021-2022年)。拟合了多变量Logistic回归,分别为每个时期的每一代人,为了比较从南方到美国其他地区的医疗经济困难程度,和Karlson-Holm-Breen(KHB)分解用于分析健康保险覆盖是否存在中介影响。
    结果:居住在南方的成年人在所有三个时期都更有可能经历医疗经济困难。居住在南方与婴儿潮一代中医疗经济困难的可能性更高1.7至2.6%(pp),在Xers一代中,1.8到4.0pp,千禧一代为1.7至2.8页。在考虑了慢性合并症后,这种关系很牢固,社会人口统计学和社会经济属性,部分是通过医疗保险覆盖面的差异介导的。
    结论:医疗经济困难问题已经在南方几代人中根深蒂固,这部分归因于医疗保险覆盖面的地区差异。
    BACKGROUND: Medical financial hardship in the United States is a growing public health concern. This study aims to assess the south vs. non-south disparities in medical financial hardship among US adults of different generations - Boomers (born between 1946 and 1964), Generation X (born between 1965 and 1980), and the Millennials (born between 1981 and 1996) across periods pre- and post- Affordable Care Act (ACA).
    METHODS: This observational study utilizes data from multiple waves of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) split into three periods: pre-ACA (2011-2013), ii) post ACA (2015-2018), and iii) COVID-19 pandemic (2021-2022). Multivariable logistic regressions were fitted, separately for each generation in each period, to compare the extent of medical financial hardship among those from South to rest of the US, and Karlson-Holm-Breen (KHB) decomposition was applied to analyze whether there was a mediating impact of health insurance coverage.
    RESULTS: Adults living in the South were more likely to experience medical financial hardship in all three periods. Residing in the South was associated with 1.7 to 2.6% points (pp) higher probability of medical financial hardship among boomers, 1.8 to 4.0 pp among generation Xers, and 1.7 to 2.8 pp among millennials. The relationship was robust after accounting for chronic comorbidities, sociodemographic and socioeconomic attributes and was partially mediated through differences in health insurance coverage.
    CONCLUSIONS: The problem of medical financial hardship has been deeply rooted in the South across generations, which was partly attributable to the regional differences in health insurance coverage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于邻域劣势与视神经脊髓炎谱系障碍(NMOSD)结果之间的关系知之甚少。
    目的是确定邻里劣势对从症状发作到诊断和年度复发率(ARR)的时间的影响。
    通过区域剥夺指数(ADI)捕获了邻里劣势,一种经过验证的邻域水平劣势度量。负二项回归模型评估了ADI对诊断延迟(症状发作和诊断之间的3个月)和ARR的影响。
    共确定了158名NMOSD患者,其中大多数为白人(56.3%)和女性(89.9%),诊断时平均年龄为46岁.ADI没有显著影响诊断延迟的几率(比值比(OR)=0.99,p=0.26)。在单变量模型中,ADI与ARR无显著相关性(OR=1.004,p=0.29),但非白种人(OR=1.541,p=0.02)和免疫抑制治疗时间(ISTS;OR=0.994,p=0.03)。白人患者使用IST平均81%的随访期,与非白人患者的平均65%相比(p<0.01)。
    在NMOSD患者中,未观察到邻域水平劣势与诊断延迟或ARR之间的显着关系。非白人患者的ARR较高,这可能与较少的IST使用有关。
    UNASSIGNED: Little is known about the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective is to determine the impact of neighborhood disadvantage on time from symptom onset to diagnosis and annualized relapse rate (ARR).
    UNASSIGNED: Neighborhood disadvantage were captured with the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a validated measure of neighborhood-level disadvantage. Negative binomial regression models assessed the impact of ADI on diagnostic delay (⩾3 months between symptom onset and diagnosis) and ARR.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 158 NMOSD patients were identified, a majority of whom were White (56.3%) and female (89.9%) with a mean age of 46 years at diagnosis. The ADI did not significantly affect odds of diagnostic delay (odds ratio (OR) = 0.99, p = 0.26). In univariable models, the ADI was not significantly associated with ARR (OR = 1.004, p = 0.29), but non-White race (OR = 1.541, p = 0.02) and time on immunosuppressive therapies (ISTs; OR = 0.994, p = 0.03) were. White patients used IST for an average of 81% of the follow-up period, compared to an average of 65% for non-White patients (p < 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: No significant relationship between neighborhood-level disadvantage and diagnostic delay or ARR in NMOSD patients was observed. Non-White patients had a higher ARR, which may be related to less IST use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:脊索瘤是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,主要通过手术治疗。与种族和社会经济地位有关的差异,可能会影响患者的预后。这项研究旨在确定脊柱脊索瘤患者获得护理和生存的预后因素。
    方法:在2004年至2017年之间查询了NCDB数据库。构建Kaplan-Meier曲线以比较不同组之间的生存概率。基于种族和社会经济因素。
    结果:确定了1769例患者,87%是白人,5%西班牙裔,4%黑色,每个亚洲人。平均年龄为61.3岁。大多数患者在学术/研究中心接受治疗,生活在大都市地区,种族之间没有区别。Black患者没有接受手术的比例明显更高(p<0.001),种族之间的生存率没有统计学上的显着差异(p=0.97)。在其他政府保险的患者中观察到更高的生存概率(p<0.0001),在较高收入四分位数(p<0.0001)中,在大都市地区(p=0.023),在学术/研究中心(p<0.0001)。在没有保险的患者中,生存概率较低,在农村地区,和社区癌症项目(p<0.0001)。
    结论:这项研究强调了脊柱脊索瘤患者在获得手术干预方面的差异,尤其是黑人。它强调了保险状况和收入对获得手术护理的重大影响,并强调了生存率的地理和机构差异。解决社会经济差异对于促进神经外科手术结果的公平性至关重要。
    OBJECTIVE: Chordomas are rare malignant neoplasms primarily treated surgically. Disparities related to race and socioeconomic status, may affect patient outcomes. This study aims to identify prognostic factors for access to care and survival in patients with spinal chordomas.
    METHODS: The NCDB database was queried between the years 2004 and 2017. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to compare survival probabilities among different groups, based on race and socioeconomic determinents.
    RESULTS: 1769 patients were identified, with 87% being White, 5% Hispanic, 4% Black, and Asian each. The mean age was 61.3 years. Most patients received care at academic/research centers and lived in a large metropolitan area, with no difference between races. A significantly higher percentage of Black patients did not undergo surgery (p < 0.001), with no statistically significant difference in survival between races (p = 0.97). A higher survival probability was seen in patients with other government insurances (p < 0.0001), in higher income quartiles (p < 0.0001), in metropolitan areas (p = 0.023), and at an academic/research center (p < 0.0001). A lower survival probability was seen in patients who are uninsured, in rural areas, and at community cancer programs (p < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights disparities in access to surgical intervention for patients with spinal chordomas, especially among Black individuals. It emphasizes the significant impact of insurance status and income on access to surgical care and highlights geographical and institutional variations in survival rates. Addressing socioeconomic differences is crucial for fostering equity in neurosurgical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在法国,每年大约每百万儿童和20岁以下的年轻人中有8人开始肾脏替代疗法(KRT)。我们假设社会剥夺可能是儿童期肾衰竭的决定因素。这项研究的目的是根据社会剥夺水平估计法国小儿KRT的发生率。
    纳入2010年至2015年在法国大都市开始KRT的所有<20年的患者。数据来自KRT法国肾脏流行病学和信息网络(REIN)的法国综合注册中心。我们使用了一个经过验证的生态指数来评估社会剥夺,2011年法国版欧洲剥夺指数(EDI)。我们根据EDI的五分位数使用直接标准化和发病率比率使用泊松回归来估计年龄标准化发病率。
    我们纳入了672名肾衰竭儿童(58.6%为男性,30.7%患有肾小球或血管疾病,43.3%在11至17岁之间开始KRT)。38.8%来自最贫困的地区(EDI的五分之一)。年龄标准化发病率随着EDI的五分之一而增加,从最不贫困的五分之一人口中每年每百万儿童的5.45(95%置信区间[CI]=4.25-6.64)到最贫困的五分之一人口中的8.46(95%CI=7.41-9.51)(Q5与第一季度1.53倍;95%CI=1.18-2.01)。
    这项研究表明,即使在一个拥有全民医疗保健系统的国家,儿科KRT的发生率与社会剥夺之间有很强的关联,表明从KRT开始就出现了社会健康不平等.这项研究强调需要进一步研究慢性肾脏病(CKD)早期阶段的社会不平等。
    UNASSIGNED: Approximately 8 per million children and young adults aged < 20 years initiate kidney replacement therapy (KRT) per year in France. We hypothesize that social deprivation could be a determinant of childhood-onset kidney failure. The objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of pediatric KRT in France according to the level of social deprivation.
    UNASSIGNED: All patients < 20 years who initiated KRT from 2010 to 2015 in metropolitan France were included. Data were collected from the comprehensive French registry of KRT French Renal Epidemiology and Information network (REIN). We used a validated ecological index to assess social deprivation, the 2011 French version of the European Deprivation Index (EDI). We estimated the age standardized incidence rates according to the quintiles of EDI using direct standardization and incidence rate ratio using Poisson regression.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 672 children with kidney failure (58.6% males, 30.7% with glomerular or vascular disease, 43.3% starting KRT between 11 and 17 years). 38.8% were from the most deprived areas (quintile 5 of EDI). The age standardized incidence rate increased with quintile of EDI, from 5.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.25-6.64) per million children per year in the least deprived quintile to 8.46 (95% CI = 7.41-9.51) in the most deprived quintile of EDI (incidence rates ratio Q5 vs. Q1 1.53-fold; 95% CI = 1.18-2.01).
    UNASSIGNED: This study showed that even in a country with a universal health care system, there is a strong association between the incidence of pediatric KRT and social deprivation showing that social health inequalities appear from KRT initiation. This study highlights the need to look further into social inequalities in the earliest stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在COVID-19大流行期间,远程心理健康(TMH)是提供可获得的心理和行为健康(MBH)服务的可行方法。这项研究调查了密西西比州TMH利用的社会人口统计学差异及其对医疗保健资源利用(HCRU)和医疗支出的影响。利用2020年1月至2023年6月期间在密西西比大学医学中心及其附属站点的6787名成年患者,其中包括3065名获得TMH服务的患者,我们观察到TMH与非TMH队列之间的社会人口统计学差异.TMH队列更有可能更年轻,女性,白人/高加索人,使用医疗保险以外的付款方式,医疗补助,或者商业保险公司,居住在农村地区,与非TMH队列相比,家庭收入更高。调整社会人口因素,TMH利用与MBH相关的门诊就诊量增加了190%,MBH相关医疗支出增加17%,全因医疗支出下降12%(所有p<0.001)。在农村居民中,TMH利用率与MBH相关门诊量增加205%和全因医疗支出减少19%相关(均p<0.001)。这项研究强调了解决TMH服务中社会人口差异的重要性,以促进公平的医疗保健服务,同时减少整体医疗支出。
    During the COVID-19 pandemic, tele-mental health (TMH) was a viable approach for providing accessible mental and behavioral health (MBH) services. This study examines the sociodemographic disparities in TMH utilization and its effects on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and medical expenditures in Mississippi. Utilizing a cohort of 6787 insured adult patients at the University of Mississippi Medical Center and its affiliated sites between January 2020 and June 2023, including 3065 who accessed TMH services, we observed sociodemographic disparities between TMH and non-TMH cohorts. The TMH cohort was more likely to be younger, female, White/Caucasian, using payment methods other than Medicare, Medicaid, or commercial insurers, residing in rural areas, and with higher household income compared to the non-TMH cohort. Adjusting for sociodemographic factors, TMH utilization was associated with a 190% increase in MBH-related outpatient visits, a 17% increase in MBH-related medical expenditures, and a 12% decrease in all-cause medical expenditures (all p < 0.001). Among rural residents, TMH utilization was associated with a 205% increase in MBH-related outpatient visits and a 19% decrease in all-cause medical expenditures (both p < 0.001). This study underscores the importance of addressing sociodemographic disparities in TMH services to promote equitable healthcare access while reducing overall medical expenditures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社会经济地位(SES)与早产之间关联的可改变机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨早产与孕妇SES或妊娠期体重增加(GWG)之间的关系。以及GWG在调节早产SES差异中的作用。
    方法:数据来自一项以医院为基础的不同胎龄中国新生儿体格生长和发育调查的子研究。包括24至42周妊娠的单胎新生儿及其母亲。使用来自母亲问卷的信息,构建了父母教育和家庭年收入的复合SES。通过从分娩时的母体体重中扣除孕前体重来计算作为介质的GWG。采用Logistic回归模型探讨早产与SES或GWG的关系。进行了因果中介分析,以测量GWG对SES至早产途径的中介作用。
    结果:在控制了潜在的混杂因素后,每增加一公斤GWG,早产风险降低12.4%(OR=0.876,95CI:0.855-0.879),SES评分每增加一个单位,早产风险降低24%(OR=0.760,95CI:0.717-0.806).中介分析支持较高的SES和降低早产风险之间的显著关联,部分是通过较高的GWG,其中GWG介导的估计比例为13.04%(95CI:11.89-16.25)。当产妇教育表明社会经济地位时,GWG作为调解人也发挥了重要作用。父亲教育或家庭收入。GWG介导了SES对早产总影响的约11.03%(95%CI:8.56-18.25),高于中度早产(6.72%,95CI:2.72-31.52)和晚期早产(9.04%,95CI:5.24-24.04)。一系列的敏感性分析证实了兴趣关联的稳健性。
    结论:GWG增加和较高的社会经济地位与较低的早产风险密切相关。GWG调解早产中的社会经济差异,最明显的是早产。了解这一机制将有助于制定妇幼保健干预措施和政策。
    BACKGROUND: The modifiable mechanisms underlying the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and preterm birth remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between preterm birth and maternal SES or gestational weight gain (GWG), as well as the role of GWG in mediating SES disparities in preterm birth.
    METHODS: Data was from a hospital-based sub-study of physical growth and development survey for Chinese newborns with various gestational ages. Singleton newborns aged from 24 to 42weeks\' gestation and their mothers were included. Using information from maternal questionnaire, a composite SES was constructed with parental education and family annual income. GWG as mediator was calculated by deducting pre-pregnancy weight from maternal weight at delivery. Logistic regression model was adopted to investigate the association of preterm birth with SES or GWG. Causal mediation analysis was performed to measure mediating effect of GWG on the pathway from SES to preterm birth.
    RESULTS: After controlling for potential confounders, risk of preterm birth was reduced by 12.4% (OR = 0.876, 95%CI:0.855-0.879) for per one-kilogram increase of GWG, and risk of preterm birth was reduced by 24% (OR = 0.760, 95%CI: 0.717-0.806) for per one-unit increase of SES score. Mediation analysis supported a significant association between higher SES and decreased risk of preterm partly through higher GWG, in which estimated proportion mediated by GWG was 13.04% (95%CI: 11.89-16.25). GWG also played a significant role as a mediator when socioeconomic status was indicated by maternal education, paternal education or family income. GWG mediated approximately 11.03% (95% CI: 8.56-18.25) of the total effect of SES on very preterm birth, which was greater than that for moderate preterm birth (6.72%, 95%CI: 2.72-31.52) and late preterm birth (9.04%, 95%CI: 5.24-24.04). A series of sensitive analysis confirmed the robustness of association of interest.
    CONCLUSIONS: Increased GWG and higher socioeconomic status are strongly associated with a lower risk of preterm birth. GWG mediates socioeconomic disparities in preterm birth, most notably in very preterm birth. Understanding this mechanism will aid in the development of interventions and policy for maternal and child health care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:作者的目的是确定社会经济脆弱性是否与社区水氟化(CWF)有关。
    方法:作者使用美国人口普查局的数据创建了4个县级漏洞标记(非白人的百分比,西班牙裔或拉丁裔,低于联邦贫困线,高中以下教育),从华盛顿州卫生部获得县级CWF数据,并使用Spearman秩相关系数和Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验评估相关性。然后,作者采访了华盛顿的122名社区成员(2022年12月至2023年3月),并对采访数据进行了归纳分析。
    结果:县级非白人比例较高与CWF水平明显较高有关(Spearman等级相关系数,0.55;95%CI,0.29至0.82;P<.001),而县级贫困与显著较低的CWF相关(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数,-0.36;95%CI,-0.70至-0.03;P=.02)。高中学业与县级CWF无关。西班牙裔和拉丁美洲人的比例明显较大,居住在CWF较高的县(P<0.05)。从采访中,更多的参与者认为自来水比不健康健康,但41%的人喜忧参半。同样,更多的参与者认为CWF是可以接受的而不是不可接受的,35%的人表示喜忧参半。对自来水和CWF的负面看法在非白人参与者中更为普遍。
    结论:华盛顿种族和种族不同社区的人们似乎有更多的机会进入CWF,而低收入社区的人获得机会较差。
    结论:CWF是预防龋齿的重要人群水平策略。需要额外的工作来改善对CWF的访问,特别是低收入社区的人。
    BACKGROUND: The aim of the authors was to determine whether socioeconomic vulnerability is associated with community water fluoridation (CWF).
    METHODS: The authors used US Census Bureau data to create 4 county-level vulnerability markers (percentages non-White, Hispanic or Latino, below the federal poverty threshold, education below high school), obtained county-level CWF data from the Washington State Department of Health, and evaluated associations using Spearman rank correlation coefficient and the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. The authors then interviewed 122 community members in Washington (December 2022-March 2023) and analyzed the interview data inductively.
    RESULTS: A higher percentage of non-White people at the county level was associated with a significantly higher level of CWF (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.82; P < .001), whereas county-level poverty was associated with significantly lower CWF (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, -0.36; 95% CI, -0.70 to -0.03; P = .02). High school completion was not associated with county-level CWF. Significantly larger proportions of Hispanics and Latinos lived in counties with higher CWF (P < .05). From the interviews, more participants thought tap water was healthy than unhealthy, but 41% had mixed feelings. Similarly, more participants thought CWF was acceptable than unacceptable, with 35% reporting mixed feelings. Negative views about tap water and CWF were more common among non-White participants.
    CONCLUSIONS: People in racially and ethnically diverse communities in Washington appear to have greater access to CWF, whereas those in lower-income communities have poorer access.
    CONCLUSIONS: CWF is an important population-level strategy to prevent caries. Additional work is needed to improve access to CWF, especially for people from low-income communities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最新的指南(欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA))在急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的治疗中,都倾向于普拉格雷/替格瑞洛,而不是氯吡格雷。因此,我们试图调查在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的情况下接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者出院后,在我们的社区医院中使用了哪种P2Y12抑制剂。
    我们使用密歇根心血管联盟蓝十字蓝盾(BMC2)PCI注册,确定了2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间到底特律都会医院就诊的STEMI患者。主要结局是STEMI住院后出院当天处方P2Y12抑制剂的选择,和基线特征进行了比较,包括种族,性别和保险类型。
    从2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日,共有366名患者就诊于这两家底特律都会医院。与替格瑞洛或普拉格雷相比,女性和非白人患者更容易出院(比值比(OR):1.56,置信区间(CI):0.99-2.45,OR:1.43,CI:0.91-2.25),然而,没有达到统计学意义。没有私人保险的STEMI患者更有可能使用氯吡格雷出院(OR:1.83,CI:1.22-2.74),在我们的队列中确实达到了统计学意义。
    在这项评估BMC2注册的回顾性单中心研究中,我们证明了基于保险的处方模式在临床上存在显著差异,基于性别和种族的差距趋势。
    UNASSIGNED: The most recent guidelines (European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA)) all favor prasugrel/ticagrelor over clopidogrel in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We therefore sought to investigate which P2Y12 inhibitors were being prescribed in our community hospital setting upon discharge among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
    UNASSIGNED: We identified patients presenting to two Metro Detroit Michigan hospitals with STEMI between January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021 using the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) PCI registry. The primary outcome was the choice of P2Y12 inhibitor prescribed on day of discharge following hospitalization for STEMI, and baseline characteristics were compared including race, sex and type of insurance.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 366 patients presented to these two Metro Detroit hospitals from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Female and non-White patients were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel than ticagrelor or prasugrel (odds ratio (OR): 1.56, confidence interval (CI): 0.99 - 2.45, and OR: 1.43, CI: 0.91 - 2.25, respectively), however, did not reach statistical significance. Patients without private insurance presenting with STEMI were more likely to be discharged on clopidogrel (OR: 1.83, CI: 1.22 - 2.74), which did reach statistical significance in our cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective single-center study evaluating BMC2 registry, we demonstrate a clinically significant disparity in prescribing patterns based on insurance, with trends for disparity based on gender and ethnicity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:运动器材的成本不断上升,再加上社会经济差异,阻碍儿童参与体育活动。休闲设备图书馆(LEL)瑞典的一项独特服务,通过提供免费设备贷款来应对这一挑战。这项研究调查了为儿童和青少年在休闲时间从事体育活动的机会免费提供体育和娱乐设备的重要性。
    方法:利用2022年夏季的横断面调查,该研究基于427名7至25岁LEL用户的数据.用户特征(人口统计,社会经济地位,身体活动概况),分析了设备使用模式和感知意义。使用消费者品牌识别的概念对研究结果进行了讨论。
    结果:结果表明,LEL在性别方面达到了广泛而多样化的儿童和年轻人群体,年龄,社会经济地位,和身体活动概况。借来的设备,主要用于游戏和娱乐,作为儿童和青少年的重要资源,特别是,对于那些社会经济地位较低的人。LEL被所有用户组认为非常重要,大多数人强调其在促进休闲活动方面的重要性。
    结论:该研究表明,LEL的成功在于其可访问性以及用户对LEL品牌的认同。用户认为LEL是一种满足各种娱乐需求的服务,而不是运动,培养包容性。在各种类型的地区进行商店的本地化,结合高质量的产品,使来自不同社会经济领域的儿童和年轻人能够使用这项服务。LEL的成功取决于保持积极的品牌形象和促进娱乐导向的身份。存在加强与用户情感纽带的机会,加强品牌战略,并将LEL定位为包容性娱乐活动的宝贵资源。总之,这项研究强调了免费贷款服务的潜力,比如LEL,弥合促进儿童和年轻人体育活动的社会经济差距。
    BACKGROUND: The escalating costs of sports equipment, coupled with socioeconomic disparities, hinder children\'s participation in physical activities. The Leisure Equipment Library (LEL), a unique service in Sweden, addresses this challenge by providing free equipment lending. This study investigated the significance of providing free lending of sports and recreational equipment for children\'s and youth\'s opportunities to engage in physical activities during leisure time.
    METHODS: Utilizing a cross-sectional survey during the summer-2022 period, the study is based on data from 427 LEL users aged 7 to 25 years. User characteristics (demography, socioeconomic status, physical activity profiles), equipment usage patterns and perceived significance are also analyzed. The findings are discussed using the concept of consumer-brand identification.
    RESULTS: The results showed that LEL reaches a broad and diverse group of children and young people in terms of gender, age, socioeconomic status, and physical activity profile. The borrowed equipment, primarily used for play and recreation, serves as an essential resource for children and youths and, in particular, for those with low socioeconomic status. LEL is considered highly important by all user groups, with a majority emphasizing its significance in facilitating leisure activities.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests LEL\'s success lies in its accessibility and that users identify with the brand of LEL. Users perceive LEL as a service catering to various recreational needs rather than sports, fostering inclusivity. The localization of stores in various types of areas, combined with high-quality products, enable children and young people from different socioeconomic areas to use the service. LEL\'s success hinges on maintaining a positive brand image and promoting a recreation-oriented identity. Opportunities exist to strengthen emotional bonds with users, enhance branding strategies, and position LEL as a valuable resource for inclusive recreational activities. In conclusion, this study highlights the potential of free lending services, such as LEL, to bridge socioeconomic gaps in the promotion of physical activity among children and young people.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号